ML22033A095

NRC-2022-000039 - Resp 1 - Final, Released Records

ML22033A095
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/31/2022
From:	NRC/OCIO
To:
Shared Package
ML22033A093	List: ML22033A094 ML22033A095
References
FOIA, NRC-2022-000039
Download: ML22033A095 (15)

Text

October 9, 2018

U.S. NRC Region IV Texas Health Resources Tower 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Attention: Jesse M. Rollins, Sen ior Allegation Coord inator

Subject:

Response to Allegation RIV-2018 -A -0083 San Onofre Nuclear Generat ing Station, Units 2 and 3

Reference : Letter, G. Michael Vasquez (USNRC) to Tom Palmisano (SCE), dated September 12, 2018

Your letter of September 12, 2018 (Reference) notified Southern California Edison Company (SCE~ that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had rec eived information about certain activities at the San Onofre Nucle a r Generat ing Station (SONGS). Your letter requested that SCE evaluate the information contained in the enclosure to the letter and submit the results of the evaluation to the NRC.

(b)(4)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemen te, CA 92674-0 128 (b)(4). (b)(7)(C)

(b)(4). (b)(7)(C)

CONflDENTIAL

CONFl01iNTIAL VV 11.7 rT Tl f l

• n-1 1 (b)(4), (b)(?)(C)

Issue 1:

'The NRC has received information that contractors at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station hav e not received adequate training on a Safety Conscious Work Env ironment. "

Findings 1 :

(b)(4), (b )(7)(C)

C Q N F I D E PJ T I A L (b) (4) vv 1thhbid ilurri public discluswe m 1l'.le1 18 SFR iJ. 300

Enclosure 1 e S Id F I Q E M I f A 1 Response to Alfegation RIV-2018 -A-0083 Page3

Additional Inform ation Re q uested

In addition to a response to the Issue described above, the NRC requested responses to five specific requests. The requests and SCE' s responses follow.

A. Provide Southern Califo rn ia Edison Com p an y p olicy reg ardin g Safety Conscious Work Environment.

B. Describe how Southern California Edison Safe ty Conscious Work Environment policy addresses contractors such as H oltec.

(b)(4)

C ON F I B E Pd T I A L (b) (4)

'.AJiO~f;ielel fre1'¥1 public disclosm e w 1de1 IO CJ!!P\\ 2.390 e O l<J pi I O E i<J I I A L Page 5 Response to Allegation RIV-2018-A-0083

(b)(4)

C. Did Southern California Edison Company prov ide Safety Conscious Work Env iron ment training to its contractor, Ho ltec? If so, provide records documentin g the training attendance b y Holtec pe rsonnel r )(4)

C tJPl fr I bl b Pl I I A b (b) (4)

'o'v5 itl 111old Fi 0111 public Jisclosa1 a m 1Ja1 1 e OFR !.nee Q ~J F I Q E ~* T I a b. Page 7 Response to Allegation RIV -2018 -A-0083 (b)(4)

D. Does Southern California Edison Com pan y whistle-blower protection p ro g ram a pp ly to contractors, such as Holtec?

(b )(4)

E. How does Southern Ca lifornia Edison Com pan y make its workers and contractors aware of NRC protected activities, such as raising safety concerns?

(b )(4)

C Q~l la I Q e N T I A b (b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)