ML21182A019
| ML21182A019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/23/2021 |
| From: | Eugene Dacus, David Decker Office of Congressional Affairs |
| To: | US Government Accountability Office (GAO), US HR, Speaker of the House, US SEN, President |
| Doyle, Daniel | |
| References | |
| 10 CFR Part 52, AP1000, NRC-2020-0269, RIN 3150-AK56 | |
| Download: ML21182A019 (6) | |
Text
41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
- 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
- 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99
41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
- 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
- 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99
41217 Submis s i on of Fe d e ral Rule s Unde r the Co n g ressional Review Act President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
- 1. Name of Department or Agency 2. Subdivision or Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NMSS
- 3. Rule Title Extending the Duration of the AP1000 Design Certification
- 4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable) 3150-AK56
- 5. Major Rule Non-major Rule
- 6. Final Rule Other Direct Final Rule
- 7. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public com m ents? Yes No N/A
- 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or Routine and Frequent or Significant; or Informational/Adm inistrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
- 9. Effective Date (if applicable) 75 days after publication
- 10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided? Yes No Digitally signed by David L. Decker Submitted by: David L. Decker Date: 2021.09.20 11:20:23 -04'00' (signature)
Eugene Dacus Name: ___________________________________________
Director
Title:
Office of Congressional Affairs For Congressional Use Only:
Date Received:
Com m ittee of Jurisdiction:
11/09/99
41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
- 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
- 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99