ML21105A024

NRC-2021-000055 - Resp 3 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed

ML21105A024
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/12/2021
From:	NRC/OCIO
To:
Shared Package
ML21105A022	List: ML21105A023 ML21105A024
References
FOIA, NRC-2021-000055
Download: ML21105A024 (2)

Text

l(b)(?)(C)

From:

Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:41 PM To:  !(b)(?)(C) I Cc: Armstrong, Aaron; NRC Allegation; Crutchley, Julie; Petrosino, Joseph; Crane, Samantha; Rasmussen, Richard

Subject:

Fw: Inspection Issues 1-page attachment is being Attachments: DWG043203_SHT_1_REV_A_FPD_Eng_326E.tif withheld in its entirety under FO IA exemption 4/proprietary information Hello (b)(?)(C)

Third email l(b)(?)(C)

---

Forwarded Messa e -----

From: (b)(?)(C)

To: (b}(7)(C)

Sent: ues ay, une ,

Subject:

Fw: Inspection Issues This part is a good example of the failure of Flowserve's QA/QC system. This part was inspected and accepted as meeting print. Some issues were written up on NCR 12384.

The truth of the matter per NRC irules the part should have lhad an NCR written against the drawing because MANY of the engineering requirements CANNOT be inspected and/or verified. This condition REQUIRES rejection. Yet Flowserve accepted the part without identifying the engineering requirements that were not met or verified. This is not allowed.

(b)(4)