ML21096A182
| ML21096A182 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/08/2021 |
| From: | Chang Y, Dejesus-Segarra J, Jing Xing NRC/RES/DRA/HFRB |
| To: | |
| Xing, Jang - 301 415 2410 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML21096A176 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML21096A182 (19) | |
Text
IDHEAS-ECA Jing Xing, Y. James Chang, Jonathan DeJesus Segarra, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented by Y. James Chang to the public meeting on IDHEAS April-08-2021
IDHEAS-ECA
- Developed based on IDHEAS-G for event condition assessments of the significance determination process
- Applicable to all NRCs risk-informed applications, including FLEX actions
- Has a software tool to calculate HEPs
- Data basis is documented in IDHEAS-DATA 2
From IDHEAS-G to IDHEAS-ECA IDHEAS-G IDHEAS-ECA Qualitative analysis guidance Same Cognitive Failure Mode (CFM):
5 categories Each category has three levels of detail Only use the top level - 5 CFMs Performance Influencing Factors (PIF):
20 PIFs Each PIF has multiple attributes (PIF Attribute)
- Keep all PIFs and attributes
- Combine some PIFs and attributes Estimate Human Error Probabilities (HEP):
3 approaches to estimate HEPs HEP quantification model 3
HEP Quantification Model CFM 1 Critical task 1 CFM 2 CFM 4 PIF attributes PIF attributes Critical task 2 Critical task 3
=,,
=,,
=,,
=,,
=,,
=,,
=,,
=,,
Time required
Time available HEP HEP
=
=
4 Pc is the probabilistic sum of its Critical Tasks HEP.
A Critical Tasks HEP is the probabilistic sum of its CFMs HEPs.
- Provide base HEP
- Provide weights (W) to modify the base HEP
- Where N is the number of the CFMs PIF Attributes with base HEP effects M is the number of the CFMs PIF Attributes with HEP modifier effects A minimum base is applied when there is no base PIF for a CFM, 5
=
=1 1 + 1
=1
1
IDHEAS-ECA Software Demo 6
SACADA (Scenario Authoring, Characterization and Debriefing Application)
Y. James Chang, Lawrence Criscione U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented by Y. James Chang in the public meeting on IDHEAS April-08-2021
=
Background===
Was developed with STPNOC to
- Improve operator simulator training
- provide human reliability data A software tool for plant instructors to develop simulation scenarios, debrief crew performance, and generate reports Benefits for simulator training
- ACAD Objective 3.2 - Managers are engaged in training activities through monitoring and oversight to provide feedback and direction
- ACAD Objective 3.3 - Personnel performance and feedback during training are used to evaluate and modify training programs
- Reduce workload in developing new scenarios Provide human reliability data for IDHEAS development Now in Revision 2, for simulator training and Job Performance Measures 3
Author Simulation Scenarios
- 2. Malfunction
- 3. Element
- 4. Characterize Context
- 5. Collect Time Data
- 6. Generate debrief scenarios
- 1. Scenario
Debriefing Screen
Debrief Crew Performance
- 1. Comment field
- 2. INPO Taxonomy
- 3. NRC Taxonomy
INPOs Operator Fundamentals -
Teamwork Issues
Debriefing 27
Crew Performance Report (1/2)
Crew Performance Report (2/2)
Generate Reports
Human Reliability Data (Human Centered, Context-Similarity Based)
Become SACADA Users
- The NRC welcomes nuclear power plants to use SACADA
- Contacts:
- Y. James Chang (James.Chang@nrc.gov)
- Sean Peters (Sean.Peters@nrc.gov) 19