ML21096A182
ML21096A182 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 04/08/2021 |
From: | Chang Y, Dejesus-Segarra J, Jing Xing NRC/RES/DRA/HFRB |
To: | |
Xing, Jang - 301 415 2410 | |
Shared Package | |
ML21096A176 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML21096A182 (19) | |
Text
IDHEAS-ECA Jing Xing, Y. James Chang, Jonathan DeJesus Segarra, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented by Y. James Chang to the public meeting on IDHEAS April-08-2021
IDHEAS-ECA
- Developed based on IDHEAS-G for event condition assessments of the significance determination process
- Applicable to all NRCs risk-informed applications, including FLEX actions
- Has a software tool to calculate HEPs
- Data basis is documented in IDHEAS-DATA 2
From IDHEAS-G to IDHEAS-ECA IDHEAS-G IDHEAS-ECA Qualitative analysis guidance Same Cognitive Failure Mode (CFM): Only use the top level - 5 CFMs
- 5 categories
- Each category has three levels of detail Performance Influencing Factors (PIF): - Keep all PIFs and attributes
- 20 PIFs - Combine some PIFs and
- Each PIF has multiple attributes (PIF Attribute) attributes Estimate Human Error Probabilities (HEP): HEP quantification model 3 approaches to estimate HEPs 3
HEP Quantification Model Time available
=
CFM 1 Critical
= , ,
task 1 CFM 2 Critical = , ,
CFM 3 task 2 Critical = , ,
CFM 4 task 3 Pc is the probabilistic sum of its Critical Tasks HEP.
A Critical Tasks HEP is the probabilistic sum of its CFMs HEPs. 4
- Provide base HEP
- Provide weights (W) to modify the base HEP
= 1+ 1
=1 =1
- Where
- N is the number of the CFMs PIF Attributes with base HEP effects
- M is the number of the CFMs PIF Attributes with HEP modifier effects
IDHEAS-ECA Software Demo 6
SACADA (Scenario Authoring, Characterization and Debriefing Application)
Y. James Chang, Lawrence Criscione U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented by Y. James Chang in the public meeting on IDHEAS April-08-2021
Background
- Was developed with STPNOC to
- Improve operator simulator training
- provide human reliability data
- A software tool for plant instructors to develop simulation scenarios, debrief crew performance, and generate reports
- Benefits for simulator training
- ACAD Objective 3.2 - Managers are engaged in training activities through monitoring and oversight to provide feedback and direction
- ACAD Objective 3.3 - Personnel performance and feedback during training are used to evaluate and modify training programs
- Reduce workload in developing new scenarios
- Provide human reliability data for IDHEAS development
- Now in Revision 2, for simulator training and Job Performance Measures 3
Author Simulation Scenarios
- 6. Generate debrief scenarios
- 1. Scenario
- 2. Malfunction
- 3. Element
- 4. Characterize Context
- 5. Collect Time Data
Debriefing Screen Debrief Crew Performance
- 3. NRC Taxonomy
- 2. INPO 1. Comment field Taxonomy
INPOs Operator Fundamentals -
Teamwork Issues
Debriefing 27
Crew Performance Report (1/2)
Crew Performance Report (2/2)
Generate Reports Human Reliability Data (Human Centered, Context-Similarity Based)
Job Performance Measures Become SACADA Users
- The NRC welcomes nuclear power plants to use SACADA
- Contacts:
- Y. James Chang (James.Chang@nrc.gov)
- Sean Peters (Sean.Peters@nrc.gov) 19