ML21040A336

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Graded Approach to Communication (IAEA)
ML21040A336
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/09/2021
From: Daniel Merzke
NRC/NRR/DRO/IRAB
To:
Daniel Merzke NRR/DRO/IRAB, 4251457
References
Download: ML21040A336 (14)


Text

Graded Approach in Communication and Consultation Dan Merzke U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Communication Stakeholders:

  • The general public
  • National government
  • State or provincial government
  • Local government
  • Licensees
  • Nuclear industry
  • International counterparts
  • Media
  • Radiation workers
  • Activist groups
  • Civic groups 2

Communication Communication Tools:

  • Press releases
  • Social media
  • News media (newspapers, television, radio)
  • Internet
  • Public meetings
  • Inspection reports
  • Documents for public comment
  • Community outreach
  • Information seminars or conferences
  • Regulator generic communications 3

Communication Communicating with Stakeholders on Licensee Performance - Annual local public meetings for all reactor licensees to discuss performance 4

Communication Step 1: Identify Stakeholder Involvement

- The purpose of these annual meetings is to meet with the public to discuss licensee operating performance during previous year.

- Public

- Licensee

- Media

- Local government officials

- Activists 5

Communication Step 2: Determine which factors are applicable

- Public interest (historical and current)- primary factor

- Operating performance - if notably declining, interest increases

- Perceived safety significance of any recent events

- Timeliness - confidence in regulator 6

Communication Step 3: Integrate the applicable factors into the decision-making process (determine appropriate communications tools, who delivers message, and timing)

- IMC 0305, Operating Reactors Assessment Program, describes graded approach for annual perf. meetings.

- Communication activities are dictated by the Action Matrix.

7

Action Matrix 8

Communication Tools (type of public meeting)

  • Formal public meeting with licensee
  • Poster board session
  • Round-table meeting
  • Webinar 9

Communication The most appropriate meeting type will be determined by consensus at the annual internal end-of-cycle assessment meeting. The primary consideration will be historical public interest. Where interest is low, the meeting will generally be informal. Where interest is high, a more formal meeting will be held, with possible use of facilitators.

10

Communication Second most important factor is licensee performance.

Guidance specifies that more formal public meetings should be considered for licensees in Columns 3 or 4 of the Action Matrix.

11

Communication Who delivers the message:

  • Action Matrix dictates level of regulator management involvement. The further to the right in the Matrix (declining performance), the higher level of management is expected to be present.

12

Communication Timing:

  • IMC 0305 provides guidance on timing of annual public meetings.

- Column 1 or 2 plants - anytime during the year to get greatest public participation

- Column 3 or 4 plants - meeting should be held within 16 weeks of the end of the assessment period. Higher stakeholder interest expected due to declining performance.

13

14 Questions