ML20365A092
| ML20365A092 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| MLML17164A381 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20365A092 (2) | |
Text
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: () c_ c:. 0 ~.\\<...
Date of Exam: '3/2/ )'/
Exam Level:
Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4, Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
- a. Grader
- 1o,A-i V"' 'I~ t l *z:.,.J,I 1. 'Z/4.ky I
I
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
t'Wlij N A1t I l(Lfl(
C.
NRC Chief Examiner (*) 0 9 o l\\').-..
Form ES-403-1 RO [d SRO Initials a
b C
,,-rv tf
~
,.JI (/,)r
/t/M oJ IA-
,s..J
'('
"f'i i' crJ-t tJ/A-
.4/ IA "1/,t
'-r1'v if' -
--rs f
~
- -r:r-J if' c:-i Date
'?{>/rt
~. °J-l'l 9/2-1} J<j/
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
,,f,;4llwfi.
- I /R,,-.,,t,S., {),\\W.. i l)., l,c;
{/
~
I
)
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 I
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: De..
C:.<.:> C ~
Date of Exam: r/1../,,- Exam Level:
Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
- a. Grader
~J.R U~lf<t_ I '£'-..,..u / ll--£
~
7
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
t./('(15 I?~ -1 fit11l. _
_ 11 ),.-
C.
NRC Chief Examiner (*) OLQ(D?'-
J I,11,,j{
- d.
NRC Supervisor (*)
Ro\\,ut.:S. ()(\\',~ ~ );/!.
I r 1/
Initials a
b C
"T.lv if
~
tJi ¢1,
'l' P/1t 1:fJ f-//A e--r
-,7..J 'f CIJ Jv(4
'N/fr f',.11 A
- 15 r,,/A
-1T tf
.,(4
---rr '('
~
Date
'l'/3/tY i *-f-r::,
2>/1, /;r i/v/U>~
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two indep~ndent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6