ML20309A347
| ML20309A347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Consolidated Interim Storage Facility |
| Issue date: | 11/02/2020 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 85FR27447 | |
| Download: ML20309A347 (2) | |
Text
From:
Marilyn Mathis Spaulding <warbletoo@aol.com>
Sent:
Monday, November 2, 2020 8:38 PM To:
WCS_CISFEIS Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID: NRC-2016-0231-0342 I am extremely concerned that companies are applying to transport nuclear waste on Union Pacific rail lines from nuclear plants east of here, across north Texas, where I live, to proposed sites in Texas and New Mexico. This was previously applied for in 2014. The difference between 2014 and now is that in 2014 they wanted to transport the waste on highways - now they want to use railroads. The best solution for nuclear waste is HOSS (Hardened On-Site Storage). It makes no sense to move this material across the country from where the waste was generated. Especially when the current regulations allow the waste to be stored where generated for 60 years.
No one wants nuclear waste in their state. I get that. However, Texas and New Mexico have been singled out (because of open space? And low regulations?) for this more than most. I urge the NRC not to approve of this transport.
Sincerely, Marilyn Mathis Dallas, Texas
Federal Register Notice:
85FR27447 Comment Number:
10159 Mail Envelope Properties (1895359016.1585005.1604367469248)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID: NRC-2016-0231-0342 Sent Date:
11/2/2020 8:37:49 PM Received Date:
11/2/2020 8:37:58 PM From:
Marilyn Mathis Spaulding Created By:
warbletoo@aol.com Recipients:
Post Office:
mail.yahoo.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 936 11/2/2020 8:37:58 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: