ML20308A743

Ile Form ES-301-4

ML20308A743
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	07/13/2020
From:	Chuck Zoia Operations Branch III
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML19121A251	List: ML20308A743 ML20308A746 ML20308A750 ML20309A920 ML20309A949 ML20309A955 ML20309A960
References
50-237/20-01, 50-249/20-01 50-237/OL-20, 50-249/OL-20
Download: ML20308A743 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Dresden Date of Exam: 618/2020 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Operating Test No.: 2020-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c*

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of seNice,

~ hH CPJ but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

?p) Mt1 ~

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenano*wtien it is to be Initialed

~

the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event f1t1 CPJ the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermOdynamlcs.

~

H-1 lc'.'.:0

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete

~ f1M p;;

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~

HH lc?z;;

Cues are given.

7.

The simulator mOdellng is not alt8'ed.

~

hM IC?0

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator performance

~

deficiencies or deviations from the ref8'enced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional MH I~

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

~

11'1 1eq

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the

~

111 CPJ form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable

!li> hl1 P-o/

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum m.mber of transients and events specified

~ l'1M CPJ on Form ES-301 *5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified crilical tasks across scenarios, when

._, Mf1 [Cz;;

possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~ 11n CPJ Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section 0.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions afte< EOP entry (1-2)

'X I 2 / 2

~ 1111 Cq

2.

Abnormal events (2-4)

YO 4 1~3

• w-, ~

3.

Major transients ( 1-2)

X I 2 / 1 J!i3. Mh CZ7J

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)

X' 1 I 2 l$ /1M CZ7J

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with subStantive actions (2. 1 per scenario X I 2 / 1

~ Mtt lc?z;;

set)

6.

Preidentified critical task$ (2. 2)

X I 4 t jt 5

~ Mtf? CPj

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.