ML20307A704

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (9290) E-mail Regarding ISP-CISF Draft EIS
ML20307A704
Person / Time
Site: Consolidated Interim Storage Facility
Issue date: 10/31/2020
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
NRC/NMSS/DREFS
NRC/NMSS/DREFS
References
85FR27447
Download: ML20307A704 (2)


Text

From:

Robert Walsh <bobwalshhome@gmail.com>

Sent:

Saturday, October 31, 2020 11:52 AM To:

WCS_CISFEIS Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender] Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS),

Docket No. 72-1050; NRC-2016-0231

Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission (TX CIS),

To the NRC:

The NRC has not adequately considered the environmental impacts of transporting nuclear waste to and from the proposed Interim Storage Partners (ISP) high level waste storage site in Texas--

neither in the cask certification processes nor this draft environmental impact statement. This shortfall is even worse for hotter "high burn up" irradiated fuel which was not considered in most analyses.

Thousands of intensely radioactive shipments, over decades, would travel through most of the states, a vast majority of Congressional districts, mostly by train but also by road and barge on vital waterways. The impacts are not "small." The reports used to make this conclusion are wrong and must be replaced. They underestimate the probability of serious accidents especially for rail freight and fires.

I object to these unnecessary risks and ask NRC to reject the ISP license application.

Sincerely, Robert Walsh 20157 Pacifica Cupertino, CA 95014 408-875-3529

Federal Register Notice:

85FR27447 Comment Number:

9290 Mail Envelope Properties (656fbb4f-282f-4c36-b79f-2a4bfbc19bbc)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), Docket No.

72-1050; NRC-2016-0231 Sent Date:

10/31/2020 11:51:49 AM Received Date:

10/31/2020 11:51:53 AM From:

Robert Walsh Created By:

bobwalshhome@gmail.com Recipients:

Post Office:

salsalabs.org Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1037 10/31/2020 11:51:53 AM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: