ML20307A159
| ML20307A159 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Consolidated Interim Storage Facility |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2020 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 85FR27447 | |
| Download: ML20307A159 (3) | |
Text
From:
Kate Kenner <faunesiegel@gmail.com>
Sent:
Sunday, November 1, 2020 4:49 PM To:
WCS_CISFEIS Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] No nuclear waste in Texas
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Dear NRC Commissioners and Staff,
Interim Storage Projects application to store radioactive waste in Texas would bring in 40,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors around the country.
The plan would target a Latinx community with deadly nuclear waste. Stored waste would be at risk from earthquakes, sinkholes, temperature extremes, wildfires, intense storms and flooding.
Consolidated interim storage is an illegal approach that does not solve our nuclear waste problem. With this proposal, the NRC has ignored expert testimony, local opposition, and tens of thousands of written and oral comments.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is deficient because it fails to:
- Account for disproportionate impacts to low-income communities of color (environmental justice communities) in the American Southwest and along transport routes.
- Details transportation routes and consider nationwide risk to millions of Americans along transport routes.
- Consider the risk of leaks, sabotage or transportation accidents.
- Include a plan to repackage leaking waste casks and a plan to move waste when required.
- Complete the required alternatives analysis by considering Hardened Onsite Storage Systems (HOSS) as an alternative to Consolidated Interim Storage.
- Consider past nuclear waste accidents that have cost hundreds of millions to billions of dollars to clean up.
- Detail cumulative impacts of the proposed facility and nearby sites on workers, local people, and the environment.
- Analyze potential for groundwater contamination.
We are an allegedly intelligent species but how smart can we be that we have made materials that can cause such devastating destruction and death and have to be encased and buried? Once again it is people with little power-poor and of colder who will bear the brunt of this. If it is that safe put it in a high income neighborhood. Such racism and irresponsibility must end. The people of West Texas do not want the waste and to be exploited and exposed to such toxins. It is time to end the manufacturing of nuclear products and thus waste because it is toxic, potentially lethal if leaks or accidents occur, and makes the people there vulnerable but in the end it makes everyone so as well.----
I oppose Consolidated Interim Storage at this and other sites. The DEIS fails to adequately analyze environmental and cumulative impacts and the socioeconomic risks of the proposed radioactive waste storage application. The NRC should protect public health and safety, the
economy and the environment, by halting the application process and denying the license for Consolidated Interim Storage.
Sincerely, Kate Kenner 3539 Weatherhead Hollow Rd Guilford, VT 05301
Federal Register Notice:
85FR27447 Comment Number:
9093 Mail Envelope Properties (debc5c12-af0c-41f5-9fad-4790fb8b8825)
Subject:
[External_Sender] No nuclear waste in Texas Sent Date:
11/1/2020 4:49:07 PM Received Date:
11/1/2020 4:49:09 PM From:
Kate Kenner Created By:
faunesiegel@gmail.com Recipients:
Post Office:
salsalabs.org Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2794 11/1/2020 4:49:09 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: