ML20297A546
| ML20297A546 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Consolidated Interim Storage Facility |
| Issue date: | 10/13/2020 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 85FR27447 | |
| Download: ML20297A546 (3) | |
Text
From:
Mark Feldman <happeevegan@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:51 PM To:
WCS_CISFEIS Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] No nuclear waste in Texas
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Dear NRC Commissioners and Staff,
Interim Storage Projects application to store radioactive waste in Texas would bring in 40,000 TONS OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL FROM NUCLEAR FUEL FROM NUCLEAR REACTORS FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY.
The plan WOULD TARGET A LATINX COMMUNITY WITH DEADLY NUCLEAR WASTE. STORED WASTE WOULD BE AT RISK FROM earthquakes, sinkholes, temperature extremes, wildfires, intense storms and flooding.
Consolidated interim storage is AN ILLEGAL APPROACH that DOES NOT SOLVE OUR NUCLEAR WASTE PROBLEM. With this proposal, the NRC has HAS IGNORED EXPERT TESTIMONY, LOCAL opposition, and tens of 1000'S of WRITTEN and ORAL COMMENTS.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement IS VERY DEFICIENT BECAUSE IT FAILS TO:
- ACCOUNT FOR disproportionate impacts to low-income communities of color (environmental justice communities) in the American Southwest and along transport routes.
- DETAILED transportation routes and consider nationwide RISK TO MILLIONS of Americans along transport routes.
- CONSIDER THE RISK OF leaks, sabotage or transportation accidents.
- INLUDE A PLAN repackage leaking waste casks and a plan TO MOVE waste when required.
- COMPLETE THE REQUIRED alternatives analysis BY CONSIDERING Hardened Onsite Storage Systems (HOSS) as an alternative to Consolidated Interim Storage.
- CONSIDER PAST nuclear waste accidents that HAVE COST cost hundreds of MILLIONS TO BILLIONS of dollars to clean up.
- DETAIL CUMULATIVE impacts of the proposed facility and nearby sites on workers, local people, and the environment.
- ANALYZE POTENIAL FOR groundwater contamination.
I STRONGLY OPPOSE Consolidated Interim Storage AT THIS & OTHER SITES. The DEIS FAILS TO ADEQUATELY ANALYZE environmental and cumulative IMPACTS and the socioeconomic risks of the proposed radioactive waste storage application. The NRC MUST PROTECT public health and safety, THE economy and THE environment, BY IMMEDIATELY HALTING THE APPLICATION PROCESS and DENYING THE LICENSE FOR Consolidated Interim Storage.
Sincerely, Mark Feldman
137 Winchester Dr Santa Rosa, CA 95401
Federal Register Notice:
85FR27447 Comment Number:
5834 Mail Envelope Properties (43673bb1-842e-4d14-9a76-fa436c69c5d6)
Subject:
[External_Sender] No nuclear waste in Texas Sent Date:
10/13/2020 2:51:22 PM Received Date:
10/13/2020 2:51:23 PM From:
Mark Feldman Created By:
happeevegan@gmail.com Recipients:
Post Office:
salsalabs.org Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2128 10/13/2020 2:51:23 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: