ML20269A329
| ML20269A329 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | HI-STORE |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2020 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 85FR16150 | |
| Download: ML20269A329 (3) | |
Text
From:
Protecting NM From All Things Nuclear
<protectnewmexico@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, September 22, 2020 11:34 PM To:
Holtec-CISFEIS Resource Cc:
anthonyalbidrez@outlook.com
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comment
Dear NRC Staff,
The following comments were transcribed from the video recording of the Peoples Hearing held by the Nuclear Issues Study Group on Wednesday, September 16, 2020 (Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfCBsXCQyOU). These written comments are being submitted with the consent of the commenters. The transcription was made possible by the work of the Nuclear Issues Study Group volunteers.
Comment sent on behalf of:
ANTHONY ALBIDREZ Sorry for the lateness of the comment. I've been kind of just debating on joining you guys, but probably the only reporter here if there is any, Im not too sure. I just wanted to, kind of, make a statement on the consensus that I've kind of drawn, is that, of the EIS, which is the only comment that I'm going to make, is that's why I've been debating on it, and that is that low risk is too much, and I think that that's been the majority consensus by activists, the public from across the state. I just wanted to say that the press coverage of this entire issue has been weak. It has been not in-depth and it has been framing the whole story from a official standpoint and not from the people. This I think, a lot of the issues that a lot of the speakers tonight have brought up are the inaccessibility of the issue, and if there was in-depth investigation done by any reporters then they would have disclosed that there's been discussion with Holtec between the Eddy Lea Energy Alliance as early as March 13, 2012 during a closed meeting, a regular meeting by the group that owns the land that they're going to auction off to Holtec, where they made presenters, which were mostly contracted nuclear waste companies sign confidentiality agreements. So even from as early as even 2006, this land has been probably prepared for a nuclear waste facility in some some sort since 2006, and the conversation has been going on now for about ten years. I think that it's been pretty quiet, as all of you guys would probably agree. Some, some statements I think that Diane made were by, were, kind of, projected from an individual named Nick Maxwell who I guess claims to be an independent journalist down south, would always enter the NRC meetings really, you know, strongly but a lot of his points through my research have been, his allegations have been mostly true. So yeah, so that's why I just wanted to, I think that it's important for the record that this conversation is as old as 2006 and it's been a pretty long battle that you guys have obviously been participating in. So you guys have all been inspiring, and I think that this forum has been more
protecting of the public and the environment than the NRCs process as well. Thank you.
Nuclear Issues Study Group www.fb.com/NuclearIssuesStudyGroup
Federal Register Notice:
85FR16150 Comment Number:
4617 Mail Envelope Properties (1875C345-2525-44D9-9E7C-707F2537555A)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comment Sent Date:
9/22/2020 11:34:16 PM Received Date:
9/22/2020 11:34:25 PM From:
Protecting NM From All Things Nuclear Created By:
protectnewmexico@gmail.com Recipients:
Post Office:
gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2829 9/22/2020 11:34:25 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: