ML20268C304
| ML20268C304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | HI-STORE |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2020 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 85FR16150 | |
| Download: ML20268C304 (3) | |
Text
From:
Mary Hostak <angelostak17@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:27 PM To:
Holtec-CISFEIS Resource Cc:
Caverly, Jill; Imboden, Stacey
Subject:
[External_Sender] Holtec "interim" waste disposal project I, Mary Hostak, agree with Sasha Pyle and here are my comments per Ms. Pyle:
From: Sasha Pyle <sasha@visiblearts.com>
Subject:
Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 public comment Date: September 22, 2020 at 10:29:05 AM MDT To: Holtec-CISFEIS@nrc.gov Cc: jill.caverly@nrc.gov, Stacey.Imboden@nrc.gov Public comment re: Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 Sept. 22, 2020 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the H New Mexico has long hosted toxic industrial and military experiments that have taken a breathtak poorly-conceived, politically expedient waste disposal project that neither addresses safe disposal I am particularly galled by the flawed concept of interim storage that depends on some entity in government agency, corporate interest, or collaboration between the two to honor this plan. Instea not the throwaway lands, the sacrifice zone, the poor state that will say yes to any toxic experimen that tired argument to be trotted out again.)
The DEIS should, to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, hav materials practices. As citizens, we have educated ourselves about: the Rio Puerco tailings spill; T problems never addressed nor their ruined lands compensated for; contemporary (and inevitable fu up into the trees in the canyons surrounding Los Alamos and released as airborne contamination d Base and the Mixed Waste Landfill into the aquifer which serves Albuquerque, our most populou fracking operations being used for dust control on roads that people unknowingly drive over, ad The DEIS should have fully investigated the risks of rail transportation of the waste from spent fu terrorism, or weather events. The damage to our environment, wildlife, cultural resources and eco Why should New Mexicans be singled out for this abuse to our health and our precious resources?
pretensesnamely the unprovable assurance that it will be removed at some later datewould de environmental decisions.
Do the letters NRC stand for Nuclear Rubberstamp Cronies? Or do you take your job descriptions design like that proposed for Holtec? While everyday Americans are struggling to survive and wo requirements were not met by the shoddy DEIS that you offered the public.
I know for a fact that you have received well over a dozen comments from the exemplary non-pro Environmental Impact Statement. I have read those comments, and done a great deal of additional consideration to the comments submitted by Beyond Nuclear, Southwest Research and Informatio other groups working in the public interest on nuclear issues. The number of NGOs working on th cultural resources, and future posed by transporting and storing spent-fuel-rod waste here.
I will close with an excerpt from Beyond Nuclears excellent comments:
Finally, under current U.S. law, this project is illegal. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as A (commercial irradiated nuclear fuel) until a permanent geologic repository is operating. So the fed Legally, the license cannot be issued until a permanent repository is operating.
Deny this license. Its time to defer to the current thinking of most informed nuclear scientists: tha across the country to an unsound facility.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sasha Pyle Santa Fe NM 505-988-9210 sasha@visiblearts.com Begin forwarded message:
From: Sasha Pyle <sasha@visiblearts.com>
Subject:
Re: BACK ME UP!! Fwd: Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 public comment Date: September 22, 2020 2:15:06 PM EDT To: Tourandokht Strick <touris@earthlink.net>
Thank you!
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Sep 22, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Tourandokht Strick <touris@earthlink.net> wrote:
I will do this some time today. Should I send it to other people too?
Federal Register Notice:
85FR16150 Comment Number:
4486 Mail Envelope Properties (CAAJcRhMT_2RRFjSFbSWhOE-Vwbbo_TB-dK_ESeJzAstYUN6wTw)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Holtec "interim" waste disposal project Sent Date:
9/22/2020 5:27:09 PM Received Date:
9/22/2020 5:27:46 PM From:
Mary Hostak Created By:
angelostak17@gmail.com Recipients:
Post Office:
mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 6412 9/22/2020 5:27:46 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: