|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24009A0372023-12-13013 December 2023
Comment (2) of Bruce Montgomery on Draft DUWP-ISG-02, Radiological Survey and Dose Modeling of the Subsurface to Support License Termination
ML23353A2442023-12-13013 December 2023
Comment (2) of Bruce Montgomery on Interim Staff Guidance on Subsurface Investigations, Radiological Survey and Dose Modeling of the Subsurface to Support License Termination
ML23348A0732023-12-11011 December 2023
Comment (2) of Charlotte Shields on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Physical Security Event Notifications, Reports, and Records
ML23348A0772023-12-11011 December 2023
Comment (1) of Charlotte Shields on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Preemption Authority, Enhanced Weapons Authority, and Firearms Background Checks
ML23349A0442023-12-11011 December 2023
Comment (1) of Charlotte Shields on Draft Regulatory Guide: Suspicious Activity Reports
ML23326A1172023-11-21021 November 2023
Comment (1) of Alan Campbell on Proposed Revision to Standard Review Plan Branch Technical Position 7-19, Guidance for Evaluation of Defense-In-Depth and Diversity to Address Common-Cause Failure Due to Latent Design Defects in Digital Safe
ML23326A0312023-11-17017 November 2023
Comment (2) of Kati R. Austgen on Draft Regulatory Guide: General Site Suitability Criteria for Nuclear Power Stations
ML23284A3892023-10-10010 October 2023
Comment (8) of Ben Holtzman on Guidance for a Technology-Inclusive Content of Application Methodology to Inform the Licensing Basis and Content of Applications for Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Advanced Reactors
ML23270B9552023-09-27027 September 2023
Comment (2) of Stewart Yuen on Proposed Revision to Standard Review Plan Section 15.0, Introduction - Transient and Accident Analyses
ML23242A0412023-08-25025 August 2023
Comment (2) of Brett Titus on Behalf of NEI on Draft NUREG: Revision to Subsequent License Renewal Guidance Documents, and Supplement to Associated Technical Bases Document
ML23236A5292023-08-21021 August 2023
Comment (6) of Bruce S. Montgomery on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Use of the Decommissioning Trust Fund During Operations for Major Radioactive Component Disposal
ML23256A1122023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (3) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1132023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1152023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1162023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (1) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1192023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1202023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications-Roadmap
ML23256A1222023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (5) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1232023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23256A1252023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applicationsroadmap
ML23234A0392023-08-10010 August 2023
Comment (4) of Ben Holtzman on Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applications - Roadmap
ML23181A0292023-06-29029 June 2023
Comment (2) of Rod Mccullum on Draft Regulatory Guide: Weather-Related Administrative Controls at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
ML23174A0492023-06-16016 June 2023
Comment (2) of Ben Holtzman on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Interim Staff Guidance: Review of Risk-Informed, Technology Inclusive Advanced Reactor Applicationsroadmap
ML23158A2162023-06-0202 June 2023
Comment (2) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Guidelines for Lightning Protection for Production and Utilization Facilities
ML23159A2472023-05-22022 May 2023
Comment (4) of William Gross on Perimeter Intrusion Alarm Systems
ML23143A1982023-05-18018 May 2023
Comment (1) of Richard Mogavero on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Draft Regulatory Guide: Cybersecurity Event Notifications
ML23130A2082023-05-0808 May 2023
Comment (9) of Mark A. Richter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Material Compatibility for Non-Light Water Reactors
ML23115A0152023-04-0707 April 2023
Comment (1) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants
ML23089A0012023-03-28028 March 2023
OMB 3150-0035, NEI Comment on 10 CFR Part 21 Information Collection Renewal 2023
ML23094A0632023-03-28028 March 2023
NRC-2022-0145- NEI Official Comment Attachment on 10 CFR Part 21 Information Collection Renewal
ML23115A0172023-03-23023 March 2023
Comment (3) of Alan Campbell on Draft Regulatory Guide: Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants
ML23074A0472023-03-14014 March 2023
Comment (2) of A. J. Clore on Perimeter Intrusion Alarm Systems
ML22354A2422022-12-19019 December 2022
Comment (4) of Thomas Basso on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Performance-Based Containment Leak Test Program
ML23005A2412022-12-16016 December 2022
Comment (1) of Janet R. Schlueter on Report on Waste Burial Charges: Changes in Decommissioning Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level Waste Burial Facilities
ML22244A1732022-08-31031 August 2022
Comment (1) of Tony Brown on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Industry Comments on Draft Appendices to NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 5, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ML22242A0302022-08-29029 August 2022
Comment (1) of Victoria K. Anderson on High Energy Arcing Fault Hazard Frequency and Consequence Modeling
ML22231B0532022-08-19019 August 2022
Comment (6) of James E. Slider on Nrc'S Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Artificial Intelligence Strategic Plan
ML22230A0402022-08-15015 August 2022
Comment (4) of William R. Gross on Behalf of NEI on Update of Facility Security Clearance
ML22224A1942022-08-12012 August 2022
Comment (1) of William R. Gross on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute on Personnel Access Authorization Requirements for Non-Immigrant Foreign Nationals Working at Nuclear Power Plants
ML22174A0722022-06-21021 June 2022
Comment (11) of Frances A. Pimentel on Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Plants
ML22174A3422022-06-21021 June 2022
Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Level 3 PRA Project Documentation (Volume 3x)
ML22165A2082022-06-13013 June 2022
Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Draft Research Information Letter Reports Determining the Zone of Influence for High Energy Arcing Faults Using Fire Dynamics Simulator, and Predicting High Energy Arcing Fault Zones of Influence for
ML22145A2992022-05-23023 May 2022
Comment (2) of Victoria K. Anderson on Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Advanced Non-Light Water Reactor Risk-Informed Activities
ML22152A0632022-05-23023 May 2022
Comment (1) of Kati R. Austgen on Safety Review of Light-Water Reactor Construction Permit Applications
ML22124A0812022-05-0202 May 2022
Comment (3) of Richard Mogavero on Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML22124A0792022-05-0202 May 2022
Comment (2) of Richard Mogavero on Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors
2023-09-27
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Meraj Rahimi, Michael Eudy, As of: 9/15/20 11:28 AM Dawnmathews Received: September 14, 2020 Kalathiveettil, Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Kyle Song, Jeanne Johnston, Tracking No. kf2-t21k-0xo9 Holly Cruz, Mary Neely Comments Due: September 14, 2020 Submission Type: Web Comment (24)
Publication Date: 8/14/2020 Docket: NRC-2020-0171 CITATION 85 FR 49685 Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation Comment On: NRC-2020-0171-0001 Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation Document: NRC-2020-0171-DRAFT-0025 Comment on FR Doc # 2020-17763 Submitter Information Email: sjv@nei.org Organization: Nuclear Energy Institute General Comment Industry Comments on Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) 1363, Draft Revision 4 to RG 1.105, Setpoints for Safety Related Instrumentation; 85 FR 49685; Docket ID NRC-2020-0171 Attachments 9-14-2020_NEI Comments on DG-1363 with attachment https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064848579f9&format=xml&showorig=false 09/15/2020
STEPHEN J. VAUGHN Senior Project Manager, Engineering and Risk 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.8163 sjv@nei.org nei.org September 14, 2020 Office of Administration Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Industry Comments on Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) 1363, Draft Revision 4 to RG 1.105, Setpoints for Safety Related Instrumentation; 85 FR 49685; Docket ID NRC-2020-0171 Project Number: 689 Submitted via regulations.gov
Dear Ms. Jennifer Borges:
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 1, on behalf of its members, submits the following comments on DG-1363, Draft Revision 4 to RG 1.105, Setpoints for Safety Related Instrumentation. We greatly appreciate the effort to revise RG 1.105 by endorsing the ANSI/ISA 67.04.01-2018 Standard without exceptions and appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft revision. We are considering an industry workshop to ensure practitioners have a better understanding of the RG 1.105 revision and its impact on the maintenance of instrument setpoints. If initial plans for a workshop are developed, we will reach out to the NRC for participation.
Please contact me at sjv@nei.org and (202) 739-8163 if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely, Stephen Vaughn 1
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is responsible for establishing unified policy on behalf of its members relating to matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEIs members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect and engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations involved in the nuclear energy industry.
Ms. Jennifer Borges September 14, 2020 Page 2 Attachment NEI Comments on DG-1363 c: Ms. Jeanne Johnston, NRR Ms. Dawnmathews Kalathiveettil, NRR Mr. Michael Eudy, RES
NEI Comments on DG-1363 Affected Section Comment/Basis Recommendation
- 1. Section B.1 ANSI/ISA S67.04-2018 should be ANSI/ISA S67.04.01- Change ANSI/ISA S67.04-2018 to ANSI/ISA 2018 S67.04.01-2018.
- 2. Section B.2.1 First sentence. The term anticipated conditions is not Change the term anticipated conditions with commonly used and causes confusion. The term accident conditions. Consider other events that accident conditions is a more appropriate term because would rely on safety-related systems and/or any of the non-normal conditions are not anticipated. components (e.g., Anticipated Operational Occurrences (AOOs)).
- 3. Section B.2.2.1 Paragraph 3 reaffirms the NRC staffs approval of Option B State that Option A of TSTF-493 is still a viable of TSTF-493, Revision 4 but there is no mention path.
throughout the DG-1363 of Option A of TSTF-493, Revision 4.
- 4. Section B.2.2.3 This section refers to drift as though is mentioned in the Clarify the language to address the inconsistency.
footnote under 4.6 of the standard; however the footnote in the standard only mentions test acceptance criteria and TLU.
- 5. Section B.2.2.5 The term (Performance Acceptance Criteria) should be Change the term (Performance Acceptance (Performance Test Acceptance Criteria) Criteria) to (Performance Test Acceptance Criteria).
1