ML20254A090

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rhode Island Quarterly Monitoring Call Summary
ML20254A090
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/11/2020
From: Michelle Beardsley, Catalano J, Dundulis B, Randy Erickson, Monica Ford, Farrah Gaskins, Olsen J, Kevin Williams
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, NRC Region 1, NRC Region 4, State of RI
To:
References
Download: ML20254A090 (5)


Text

RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH QUARTERLY MONITORING CONFERENCE CALL August 11, 2020 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attendees Rhode Island Department of Health Attendees Monica Ford, Region I Jennifer Olsen-Armstrong, Chief, Center for Health Facilities Regulation Kevin Williams, Region I Joseph Catalano, Chief of Management Services Randy Erickson, Region IV Bill Dundulis, Risk Assessment Toxicologist Farrah Gaskins, Region I Michelle Beardsley, NMSS BACKGROUND The Rhode Island Agreement State Program (the Program) has experienced challenges maintaining an adequate and compatible program since 2011. In 2011, based on findings presented by the IMPEP team, a Management Review Board (MRB) found Rhode Island adequate to protect public health and safety, but needs improvement and compatible with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) program and subsequently placed the Program on Monitoring. In 2016, as a result of the IMPEP teams findings, the MRB again found the Program adequate to protect public health and safety, but needs improvement, and compatible with the NRCs program. Additionally, the MRB directed that the Program continue to be on Monitoring, that quarterly calls between the Rhode Island Department of Health and NRC staffs be conducted, and that two periodic meetings take place one at approximately 12 months and the other at approximately 30 months from the date of the 2016 IMPEP review. The first periodic meeting was held with the Program on March 9, 2017 (ML17095A297) and the second periodic meeting was held on September 17, 2018 (ML18291A582). An MRB held after the second periodic meeting discussed whether or not the Program should be removed from Monitoring based on corrective actions taken and improved program performance. While the MRB agree that the Program had improved, since a sustained period of improved performance had not yet been demonstrated, the MRB ultimately decided that the Program should continue on Monitoring and that the next IMPEP review should be held as scheduled in fiscal year 2020. [Note: Due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) the IMPEP review previously scheduled for July 2020 has been tentatively rescheduled to fiscal year 2021 (December 2020).]

DISCUSSION OF PROGRAM STATUS Technical Staffing and Training (2016 IMPEP finding: Satisfactory but needs improvement)

The Program is comprised of four technical staff members, a program supervisor, and a chief (who is the Programs Radiation Control Program Director (RCPD)). The total effort allocated to support the Program is approximately 1.42 full-time equivalents (FTE). Since the 2016 IMPEP review the Program has lost one technical staff member (January 2017), the program supervisor on two separate occasions (March 2019 and March 2020) and the chief (March 2019). The technical staff position was filled in April 2017, the program supervisor was filled in September 2019 (before becoming vacant again in March 2020), and the chief position was filled in July 2019. In March of 2020 the newly appointed program supervisor left to take a job in another State. Due to the COVID-19 PHE, which started to escalate around the time of the program supervisors departure, the Program has been unable to post the position and is unsure when they will get approval to post the position.

2 The Program has a training and qualification manual compatible with the NRCs Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 1248. Staff going through the qualification process have been assigned a training and qualification journal to complete. One technical staff person is currently working on becoming a qualified license reviewer (this individual is already a qualified inspector). During previous calls, the Program stated that technical staff are completing refresher training; however, it has not been officially tracked. The Program has started work on a method to document each individuals refresher training and ensure that all qualified staff are meeting the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> every 24 months requirement, however it is not yet complete. The Program stated that once staff return to the Office on a more routine basis this will be able to be completed.

The 2016 MRB generated one recommendation for this performance indicator. The recommendation and its status are listed below.

Recommendation 1: The MRB recommends that the program management take measures to ensure proper documentation of inspection tracking dates and ensure the Rhode Island Agreement State Programs licensing and inspection files are complete.

Status: To address the first part of the recommendation, the program supervisor in place at the time of the 2016 IMPEP review placed a white board in their office and populated it with information pertaining to all of the Programs Priority 1, 2, and 3 licensees (which are separated by Priority and color coded).

This could be accomplished since there are approximately 20 Priority 1, 2, and 3 licensees regulated by the Program. The white board shows the last inspection completed and the next inspection due as well as the expiration date of the license. This keeps the information prominently displayed and can be easily consulted should a question about inspection due dates arise. The Program solely used this system through the end of calendar year 2019. During the February 2020 call, the Program stated that all of the information contained on the white board had been moved to the tracking system that is already in use by the Rhode Island Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The Program stated that this effort is still a work in progress and that although the data has been populated it still needs to be reviewed. In the meantime, the Program is still maintaining the white board in the supervisors office and also maintains an excel spreadsheet on a shared drive to track inspections.

To address the second part of the recommendation, the Program originally trained two administrative support staff to support filing efforts and ensure the licensing and inspection files were complete. At the time of the January 2019 call, these staff worked with the Program for approximately one hour each day. Additional time was approved as needed including time working on Saturdays. During the June 2019 call the Program stated that they mainly rely on one administrative assistant who dedicates about

.5 FTE of their time to the Program. The Program stated that this is an appropriate amount of support and that licensing and inspection filing is being completed. There have been no changes to the efforts to address this recommendation since the May 2020 quarterly monitoring call.

Status of the Materials Inspection Program (2016 IMPEP finding: Unsatisfactory) and Technical Quality of Inspections (2016 IMPEP finding: Satisfactory)

During the 2016 IMPEP review, the team determined that 11 of 41 Priority 1, 2, 3, and initial inspections had been completed overdue resulting in 27 percent of inspections being completed overdue. The Program has since made inspections a focus area and has completed all Priority 1, 2, and 3 inspections in accordance with their assigned inspection frequencies. As of this call the Programs ability to perform inspections has not been affected by restrictions put in place due to the COVID-19 PHE.

3 Two new licenses have been issued since the last IMPEP review. The Program stated that one of the initial licensees has not possessed material since the license was issued over two years ago. The Program has visited the licensee several times and is working with the licensee to understand when operations may begin. The last onsite visit was around March 2020. The Program is aware of the regulation that states that a licensee will begin decommissioning if no work occurs within 24 months (RI equivalent to 10 CFR 30.36(d)) and is taking this into consideration going forward. (No change from October 2019 call.)

The Program has continued to be attentive to reciprocity inspections. Staff completed two inspections of five candidate licensees in calendar year 2016 (40%); two inspections of six candidate licensees in calendar year 2017 (33%); three inspections of four candidate licensees in calendar year 2018 (75%),

and four inspections of nine candidate licensees in calendar year 2019 (44%). The Program has not performed any reciprocity inspections in calendar year 2020 as of this call, however believes that they should be able to complete the two inspections needed to meet the 20 percent goal before the end of the year. Supervisory accompaniments of all qualified inspection staff were completed in calendar years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. A discussion on the revisions to IMC 2800 occurred during the call.

The Program was made aware of the changes to reciprocity inspections and how those would impact the Program. The Program staff stated that they would look at the revisions to the IMC and make changes to their reciprocity inspection process as appropriate. Lastly, the Program stated that most inspection findings were being issued within 30 days of the inspection exit.

The 2016 IMPEP team kept open one recommendation from the 2011 IMPEP review for the performance indicator Status of Materials Inspection Program. The recommendation along with its status are listed below.

Recommendation 2: The team recommends that the State take appropriate measures to conduct priority 1, 2, and 3 inspections and initial inspections in accordance with the inspection priority in IMC 2800.

Status: Since the 2016 IMPEP review, the Program has made inspections a focus area. All Priority 1, 2, and 3 inspections have been completed in accordance with the assigned inspection Priority listed in the NRCs IMC 2800. Two new licenses requiring an initial inspection were issued since the 2016 IMPEP review. Staff has completed one initial inspection but for this licensee, since no material is present, will need to continue to do a follow-up initial inspection within 12 months. The second new license was issued during the summer of 2019 and the initial inspection is being planned (not to exceed 12 months from the date of license issuance). This licensee is an out-of-state industrial radiography licensee and has not performed work in Rhode Island since obtaining a specific license. (No change since the May 2020 quarterly monitoring call.)

Technical Quality of Licensing (2016 IMPEP finding: Satisfactory)

The Program has approximately 42 specific licensees. The Program takes all received licensing actions and places them in a computer tracking system and assigns them a log number. This database is very generic and does not contain any security-related information.

All licensing actions received are worked on by qualified staff. Once the work on each incoming action is complete, the action undergoes a concurrence review by a senior staffer. Normally licenses are signed by either the program supervisor or chief, however due to turnover in these two positions, senior staff have also been signing the licenses. All renewals are current and there is no backlog of renewal actions. At the time of this call one renewal action was in house. The review of the renewal is

2 complete and it is in the process of being issued. All other licensing actions that have been received (amendments, initials, terminations) have been completed. Licenses are on a 10-year renewal cycle.

Staff is aware of the continuing revisions to the NRCs NUREG 1556 series and plans to update licensing guidance as appropriate. The one exception is NUREG 1556 Volume 9. The Program stated that it would need to wait for its regulations to be updated before it could implement changes to its equivalent guidance.

The MRB for the 2016 IMPEP review generated one recommendation for this performance indicator.

The recommendation along with its status are as follows.

Recommendation 3: The MRB recommends that program management develop and implement an action plan to reduce the licensing renewal backlog.

Status: The Programs management and staff worked together to complete the backlogged renewals.

The Program is aware of the need to complete renewals in a timely manner and will ensure timely completion of renewal actions received going forward. There is no backlog of renewal applications at this time. The Program has one renewal in house that has been completed and is in the process of being issued.

Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities (2016 IMPEP finding: Satisfactory)

The Program is aware of the need to maintain an effective response to incidents and allegations. The Program uses a system called Aspen Complaints Tracking System (ACTS). Incidents are quickly reviewed for their effect on public health and safety and staff is dispatched to perform onsite investigations when necessary. The Program communicates reportable incidents to the NRCs Headquarters Operations Center as appropriate. The Program has received one reportable event since the 2016 IMPEP review. This event involved a Gammaknife and met the criteria to be considered an abnormal occurrence. No allegations have been received since the previous review.

The Program stated that a formal procedure for incident and allegation response did not previously exist. The NRCs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards State Agreements procedure SA-200, Compatibility Categories and Health and Safety Identification for NRC Regulations and Other Program Elements, lists procedures that pertain to response to events and allegations as a compatibility category C. Compatibility category C means a program element, the essential objectives of which should be adopted by the State to avoid conflicts, duplications or gaps. The manner in which the essential objectives are addressed need not be the same as NRC, provided the essential objectives are met. At the time of the June 2019 call, the Program was provided with a copy of the Allegations procedure used by the NRCs Headquarters Operations Officers to use as a template. The Program has completed a draft procedure and it is currently with legal staff for review.

Compatibility Requirements (2016 IMPEP finding: Satisfactory)

In 2016 Rhode Island enacted state statute 42-35-5 into its General Laws. This statute required the Program to recodify all of its rules into a new format as described by the Rules and Regulations Formatting and Filing Manual by no later than December 31, 2018 or it would not be able to enforce against them. The Program stated that it met the timeline and its amended regulations went into effect on January 1, 2019. The NRC comments on the final regulations will be addressed by the Program along with changes associated with Regulations Amendment Tracking Sheet IDs 2018-1 and 2018-2 later this year. The Program stated that it was hopeful all comments would be addressed and finalized before the end of calendar year 2020, however it is waiting to receive the approval to be able to move

2 forward regulations that are not related to COVID-19. Once the approval is received the process should take 8-10 weeks before the regulations are finalized.

The Programs regulations are subject to sunset requirements. The Program must refile their regulations every five years. The Program last completed a refiling in January 2017. The next refiling is scheduled for 2022.

Conclusion The Program continues to improve and has acted on the recommendations that were made during the 2016 IMPEP review. The Program has one vacancy, which is the program supervisor position. This position has been vacant since March 2020. The position is stalled in the budget office for COVID related reasons. Once restrictions are lifted the Program hopes to be able to post and fill the position.

The Program has made inspection timeliness a priority and has performed no inspections overdue since the last IMPEP review. Additionally, the Program completed all of its backlogged licensing renewals that were discussed in the recommendation from the 2016 IMPEP review, had one license renewal in house which is in progress, and had no licensing backlog at the time of this call.

Next Quarterly Call:

None (unless the IMPEP gets rescheduled)

Next IMPEP:

Rhode Islands next IMPEP review was originally scheduled for July 13-16, 2020. However, due to restrictions put in place in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, the inspector accompaniments scheduled for June 2020 were not able to be accomplished. Therefore, the Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards management decided that the IMPEP review should be rescheduled. The inspector accompaniments have been rescheduled for October 2020 and the IMPEP review has been rescheduled for December 7-11, 2020.