ML20252A088
ML20252A088 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 09/03/2020 |
From: | Jennifer Dudek Acquisition Management Division |
To: | |
References | |
31310019C0011 | |
Download: ML20252A088 (20) | |
Text
31310019C0011 P00001 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 11545 Rockville Pike; M/S: T-10A12 Rockville, MD 20852 Telephone Number: (301) 415-1649 Email: David.Stroup@nrc.gov
- 6. Clause I.3 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS. (JAN 2019) is updated to the following:
I.3 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS. (AUG 2020)
(a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items:
(1) 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements (JAN 2017) (section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions)).
(2) 52.204-23, Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities (JUL 2018) (Section 1634 of Pub. L. 115-91).
(3) 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. (AUG 2020) (Section 889(a)(1)(A) of Pub. L. 115-232).
(4) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (NOV 2015).
(5) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553).
(6) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004)
(Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note)).
(b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (Contracting Officer check as appropriate.)
[X] (1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (JUN 2020), with Alternate I (OCT 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4704 and 10 U.S.C.
2402).
[X] (2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (JUN 2020) (41 U.S.C. 3509).
4
31310019C0011 P00001
[ ] (3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (JUN 2010) (Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.)
[ ] (4) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (JUN 2020) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
(5) (Reserved)
[ ] (6) 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements (OCT 2016)
(Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C).
[ ] (7) 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (OCT 2016) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C).
[X] (8) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (JUN 2020) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
[ ] (9) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (OCT 2018) (41 U.S.C. 2313).
[ ] (10) (Reserved)
[ ] (11)(i) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole Source Award (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 657a).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-3.
[ ] (12)(i) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (MAR 2020) (if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-4.
[ ] (13) (Reserved)
[ ] (14)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (MAR 2020)
(15 U.S.C. 644).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-6.
[ ] (15)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-7.
[ ] (16) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (OCT 2018) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)).
[ ] (17)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (JUN 2020) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)).
5
31310019C0011 P00001
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2016) of 52.219-9.
[ ] (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2016) of 52.219-9.
[ ] (iv) Alternate III (JUN 2020) of 52.219-9.
[ ] (v) Alternate IV (JUN 2020) of 52.219-9.
[ ] (18)(i) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-13.
[ ] (19) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C.
637(a)(14)).
[ ] (20) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan (JAN 1999)
(15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)).
[ ] (21) 52.219-27, Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 657f).
[ ] (22)(i) 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (MAY 2020) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2020) of 52.219-28.
[ ] (23) 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB)
Concerns (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
[ ] (24) 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
[ ] (25) 52.219-32, Orders Issued Directly Under Small Business Reserves (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).
[ ] (26) 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule (MAR 2020) (15 U.S.C.
637(a)(17)).
[X] (27) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (JUN 2003) (E.O. 11755).
[X] (28) 52.222-19, Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (JAN 2020) (E.O. 13126).
[X] (29) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (APR 2015).
[X] (30)(i) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (SEP 2016) (E.O. 11246).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (FEB 1999) of 52.222-26.
[X] (31)(i) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
6
31310019C0011 P00001
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (JUL 2014) of 52.222-35.
[X] (32)(i) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (JUN 2020) (29 U.S.C. 793).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (JUL 2014) of 52.222-36.
[ ] (33) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
[ ] (34) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (DEC 2010) (E.O. 13496).
[X] (35)(i) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (JAN 2019) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAR 2015) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
[ ] (36) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (OCT 2015). (E. O.
12989). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items or certain other types of commercial items as prescribed in 22.1803.)
[ ] (37)(i) 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-Designated Items (MAY 2008) (42 U.S.C.
6962(c)(3)(A)(ii)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.)
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAY 2008) of 52.223-9 (42 U.S.C.
6962(i)(2)(C)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.)
[ ] (38) 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons (JUN 2016) (E.O. 13693).
[ ] (39) 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners (JUN 2016) (E.O. 13693).
[ ] (40)(i) 52.223-13, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Imaging Equipment (JUN 2014) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (OCT 2015) of 52.223-13.
[ ] (41)(i) 52.223-14, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Televisions (JUN 2014) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).
(ii) Alternate I (JUN 2014) of 52.223-14.
[ ] (42) 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products (MAY 2020) (42 U.S.C. 8259b).
[ ] (43)(i) 52.223-16, Acquisition of EPEAT-Registered Personal Computer Products (OCT 2015) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).
7
31310019C0011 P00001
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (JUN 2014) of 52.223-16.
[X] (44) 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (JUN 2020) (E.O. 13513).
[ ] (45) 52.223-20, Aerosols (JUN 2016) (E.O. 13693).
[ ] (46) 52.223-21, Foams (JUN 2016) (E.O. 13693).
[ ] (47)(i) 52.224-3, Privacy Training (JAN 2017) (5 U.S.C. 552a).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2017) of 52.224-3.
[ ] (48) 52.225-1, Buy American-Supplies (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83).
[ ] (49)(i) 52.225-3, Buy American-Free Trade Agreements-Israeli Trade Act (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83, 19 U.S.C. 3301 note, 19 U.S.C.
2112 note, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note, 19 U.S.C. 4001 note, Pub. L. 103-182, 108-77, 108-78, 108-286, 108-302, 109-53, 109-169, 109-283, 110-138, 112-41, 112-42, and 112-43.
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (MAY 2014) of 52.225-3.
[ ] (iii) Alternate II (MAY 2014) of 52.225-3.
[ ] (iv) Alternate III (MAY 2014) of 52.225-3.
[ ] (50) 52.225-5, Trade Agreements (OCT 2019) (19 U.S.C. 2501, et seq., 19 U.S.C. 3301 note).
[X] (51) 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (JUN 2008) (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).
[ ] (52) 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States (OCT 2016) (Section 862, as amended, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008; 10 U.S.C. 2302 Note).
[ ] (53) 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside (NOV 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150).
[ ] (54) 52.226-5, Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area (NOV 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150).
[ ] (55) 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements (JUN 2020).
[ ] (56) 52.232-29, Terms for Financing of Purchases of Commercial Items (FEB 2002) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)).
[ ] (57) 52.232-30, Installment Payments for Commercial Items (JAN 2017) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)).
8
31310019C0011 P00001
[X] (58) 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-System for Award Management (OCT 2018) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
[ ] (59) 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer - Other than System for Award Management (JUL 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
[ ] (60) 52.232-36, Payment by Third Party (MAY 2014) (31 U.S.C. 3332).
[ ] (61) 52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards (AUG 1996) (5 U.S.C.
552a).
[ ] (62) 52.242-5, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (JAN 2017)(15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13)).
[ ] (63)(i) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (FEB 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx. 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C.
2631).
[ ] (ii) Alternate I (APR 2003) of 52.247-64.
[ ] (iii) Alternate II (FEB 2006) of 52.247-64.
(c) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (c),
applicable to commercial services, that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (Contracting Officer check as appropriate.)
[ ] (1) 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (AUG 2018) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
[ ] (2) 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires (MAY 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
[ ] (3) 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards-Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts) (AUG 2018) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
[ ] (4) 52.222-44, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards-Price Adjustment (MAY 2014) (29 U.S.C 206 and 41 U.S.C.
chapter 67).
[ ] (5) 52.222-51, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment-Requirements (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
[ ] (6) 52.222-53, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Certain Services-Requirements (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
[ ] (7) 52.222-55, Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 (DEC 2015).
9
31310019C0011 P00001
[ ] (8) 52.222-62, Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 (JAN 2017) (E.O. 13706).
[ ] (9) 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations (JUN 2020) (42 U.S.C. 1792).
(d) Comptroller General Examination of Record. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of this paragraph (d) if this contract was awarded using other than sealed bid, is in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in FAR 2.101, on the date of award of this contract, and does not contain the clause at 52.215-2, Audit and Records - Negotiation.
(1) The Comptroller General of the United States, or an authorized representative of the Comptroller General, shall have access to and right to examine any of the Contractor's directly pertinent records involving transactions related to this contract.
(2) The Contractor shall make available at its offices at all reasonable times the records, materials, and other evidence for examination, audit, or reproduction, until 3 years after final payment under this contract or for any shorter period specified in FAR Subpart 4.7, Contractor Records Retention, of the other clauses of this contract. If this contract is completely or partially terminated, the records relating to the work terminated shall be made available for 3 years after any resulting final termination settlement. Records relating to appeals under the disputes clause or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this contract shall be made available until such appeals, litigation, or claims are finally resolved.
(3) As used in this clause, records include books, documents, accounting procedures and practices, and other data, regardless of type and regardless of form. This does not require the Contractor to create or maintain any record that the Contractor does not maintain in the ordinary course of business or pursuant to a provision of law.
(e)(1) Notwithstanding the requirements of the clauses in paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
and (d) of this clause, the Contractor is not required to flow down any FAR clause, other than those in this paragraph (e)(1) of this paragraph in a subcontract for commercial items. Unless otherwise indicated below, the extent of the flow down shall be as required by the clause-(i) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (JUN 2020) (41 U.S.C. 3509).
(ii) 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements (JAN 2017) (section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions)).
10
31310019C0011 P00001 (iii) 52.204-23, Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities (JUL 2018) (Section 1634 of Pub. L. 115-91).
(iv) 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. (AUG 2020) (Section 889(a)(1)(A) of Pub. L. 115-232).
(v) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (OCT 2018)
(15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)), in all subcontracts that offer further subcontracting opportunities. If the subcontract (except subcontracts to small business concerns) exceeds the applicable threshold specified in FAR 19.702(a) on the date of subcontract award, the subcontractor must include 52.219-8 in lower tier subcontracts that offer subcontracting opportunities.
(vi) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (APR 2015).
(vii) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (SEP 2016) (E.O. 11246).
(viii) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
(ix) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (JUN 2020) (29 U.S.C. 793).
(x) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (JUN 2020) (38 U.S.C. 4212).
(xi) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (DEC 2010) (E.O. 13496). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (f) of FAR clause 52.222-40.
(xii) 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (AUG 2018) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
(xiii) [X] (A) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (JAN 2019) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
[ ] (B) Alternate I (MAR 2015) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C.
chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
(xiv) 52.222-51, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment-Requirements (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
(xv) 52.222-53, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Certain Services-Requirements (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67).
11
31310019C0011 P00001 (xvi) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (OCT 2015) (E.
O. 12989).
(xvii) 52.222-55, Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 (DEC 2015).
(xviii) 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 (JAN 2017) (E.O. 13706).
(xix)(A) 52.224-3, Privacy Training (JAN 2017) (5 U.S.C. 552a).
(B) Alternate I (JAN 2017) of 52.224-3.
(xx) 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States (OCT 2016) (Section 862, as amended, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008; 10 U.S.C. 2302 Note).
(xxi) 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations (JUN 2020) (42 U.S.C. 1792). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (e) of FAR clause 52.226-6.
(xxii) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (FEB 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx. 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C. 2631). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (d) of FAR clause 52.247-64.
(2) While not required, the Contractor May include in its subcontracts for commercial items a minimal number of additional clauses necessary to satisfy its contractual obligations.
(End of clause)
All other terms and conditions of the contract remain the same.
12
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 MODIFIED DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT C.1 Title of Project Technical services related to decrement curve testing at a high power electrical testing facility.
C.2 Background High Energy Arcing Faults (HEAFs) have the potential to cause extensive damage to the failed electrical component and distribution system along with adjacent equipment and cables within the zone of influence. The significant energy released during a HEAF event can act as an ignition source to other components. By better understanding the HEAF event hazard through testing, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) can advance the state of knowledge and support developing a model to adequately evaluate this hazard in performance-based applications.
Starting in 2013, an NRC sponsored test program was conducted to obtain data to support HEAF risk model advancements (NRC-HQ-13-C-04-0012). Results from this testing and subsequent review of nuclear power plant operating experience identified several instances where the apparent damage from HEAF events involving aluminum exceeded that of existing hazard models. As such, the NRC initiated an internal generic issue program in 2016. As part of this program the NRC is assessing any risk impacts through testing and hazard model refinement.
In 2018, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) published a report (EPRI 3002011923) documenting various plant configurations where HEAF can occur. One of the identified areas involves unit connected designs where there is no main generator breaker to clear the fault and the fault will persist until the generator excitation field collapses. Since there is no other isolation between the unit auxiliary transformers (UAT) /
switchgear bus and the main generator, the fault continued to be fed for the duration of the generator coast down until the voltage collapsed sufficiently to the point where the arc could no longer be sustained and extinguished. Reported cases of generator fed fault have typically been on the order of 4 to 8 seconds. There have been at least 8 known events, and likely several more, which makes this scenario realistic with probability of future events. Given the majority of nuclear power plants have this design and the potential for extend duration faults and thus large energy release, the NRC needs data via HEAF test using similar conditions, commonly referred to as generator decrement.
NRC has been (NRC-HQ-13-C-04-0012) and is currently under contract (NRC-HQ-60-15-C-0004) with KEMA Powertest LLC to perform HEAF tests that support resolution of the generic issue and a follow-on international effort (Phase II Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD] program). However, to ensure that the testing is representative for the specific scenarios involving generator decrement the NRC needs to perform testing with an energy source that mimics plant configurations. Since this is a first of a kind approach that differs from standard arc flash and HEAF testing practices where super excitation is used to maintain a constant energy source, specialized knowledge, skills, and tools are needed to ensure that the high power electrical testing facility is capable of performing the desired testing. This type of analysis is outside the scope of existing contract with KEMA Powertest LLC.
C.3 Objective The objective of this contract is to perform studies, simulations, and validation to determine if a high power testing facility is capable of replicating the decaying energy profile of a tripped plant generator from its prime mover.
13
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 If it is determined that the high power testing facility is capable to perform this decrement testing, then facility modification (Contract Option) and testing will be performed to fulfil the testing needs. Testing will be performed on medium voltage electrical distribution equipment. If it is determined that the high power testing facility is not capable to perform this decrement testing, then the testing shall proceed following standard HEAF testing protocol at a lower voltage and longer duration that provides a similar total energy delivered to that of a generator fed HEAF decrement event.
C.4 Scope of Work/Tasks The contractor shall provide all resources necessary to accomplish the tasks and deliverables described in this Statement of Work (SOW). The contractor shall provide technical services to determine the feasibility of performing actual HEAF testing using a generator decrement energy source. Following the feasibility study, the contractor shall perform the tests at a high power testing facility.
The high power testing facility (i.e., the facility) is defined as an independent, short circuit test facility accredited to the American Association of Laboratory Accreditation ISO 17025 and capable of providing at least 50 megajoules (MJ) of electrical energy to the test specimen.
The contractor shall perform the following Tasks:
Task 1: Energy delivery simulation modeling Under this task, the contractor shall:
- 1. Develop a simulation model using standard industry practices and techniques for the facility equipment that would be used for full scale testing (Tasks 5 and 6).
- 2. Validate the developed model with the facility test results and make adjustment to simulation model as needed. The validation shall follow industry practices and identify simulation modeling bias and uncertainty. The simulation modeling parameters and parameter ranges spanning the test parameter requirements in Task 5 and 6 shall also be identified and documented in the finds.
- 3. Compare the facility capabilities (simulations) with nuclear power plant (NPP) generating station unit connected fault characteristics.
- a. The NRC will acquire and provide to the contractor the NPP system characteristics directly from plants or via its collaborative research partners (Electric Power Research Institutes [EPRI]).
- 4. Compare the facility simulation model results to plant electrical distribution characteristics at the medium voltage bus level on the low side of the UAT.
- 5. Document the findings from this task in a letter report.
Task 2: Energy delivery system modification analysis Based on the results from Task 1, the contractor shall determine the capabilities of the facility to provide energy delivery profile similar to a nuclear power plant generator fed faults (generator decrement curve). A facility energy delivery decrement within 20 percent of the total integrated energy over the decay duration as compared to nuclear power plant generator fed HEAFs is considered acceptable. Information on nuclear power plant generator decrement curve can be found on the EPRI website and publicly available EPRI report 3002011923. This effort is broken down into the following sub-tasks.
Task 2.1: Generator Feasibility Study Under this sub-task, a feasibility study shall be performed to determine if the Laboratory Generator can provide a power delivery profile like a nuclear power plant generator fed fault (generator decrement curve). The deliverable for this subtask shall be a Letter Report documenting the feasibility of the Laboratory Generator to provide the power delivery profile. [Complete]
14
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Task 2.2: Detailed Engineering Evaluation Under this sub-task, a detailed engineering evaluation of the facility shall be performed to determine if the laboratory ancillary systems (e.g., excitation, excitation controls, etc.) along with the generator (Task 2.1) are capable of providing power delivery decrement within 20 percent of the total integrated energy over the decay duration as compared to the reference nuclear power plant generator curve provided as part of Task 1. This sub-task shall include information collection, testing requirement confirmation, review of existing plant and testing equipment capability.
The deliverables for this sub-task shall be:
- 1) a technical report on testing requirements. This report will include:
- Type and ratings of equipment to be tested (voltage and current);
- Testing parameters to be considered (test system voltage before and estimated Generator voltage during test, maximum frequency drop allowed, Fault Arcing Current profile); and
- Characteristics of the arc during the test execution (confirmation of model used in Task 1 and Task 2.1)
- 2) a Letter Report containing the detailed engineering evaluation and estimation of level of effort required to complete Task 4.1. An order of magnitude estimate is defined as a high-level list of modifications, testing (if any) & deliverables (list of documents to be provided within the scope of Task 4.1).
In details, this Letter Report will include:
- The description of the implemented model (the model developed during Task 1 and Task 2.1 will be converted to an ATP - Alternative Transient Program- model)
- The outcome of model validation compared to KEMA Test Reports (wave-shape comparison)
- Simulation results showing the laboratory capability with reference to the testing requirements defined in deliverable 1).
- If any, the description of the modifications required to reach the testing requirement defined in deliverable 1). This description will include the new equipment and systems needed, defining the type of work to be implemented: e.g. the regulating range in terms of voltage and current of the excitation system (if any); the energy capability of the new equipment to be replaced (if any); the reactance range of the new current limiting reactors (if any).
- A budgetary evaluation of the upgraded system components.
Information on the existing Laboratory station equipment will be used as input data. This information will regard both the original design ratings and the limitations and problems that are currently encountered in the performance of the tests including the operational aspects that need to be taken into account in the subsequent design activities.
More detailed specifications of the upgraded parts will be provided during Task 4.1, if approved by the Client All of the above will be based on the following information to be provided by the NRC prior to initiation of Task 2.2 above: Type and ratings of equipment to be tested (voltage and current);
Testing parameters to be considered (test system voltage before and estimated Generator voltage during test, maximum frequency drop allowed, Fault Arcing Current profile);
Characteristics of the arc during the test execution.
Task 2.3: Scaled model validation tests (Optional Task 1) *(Note: If work for this optional task is to be authorized, it shall be authorized by mutual agreement of the parties by execution of a bilateral modification to the contract.)
Under this task, if NO modifications are required to the testing facility, the laboratory shall perform a set of scaled HEAF tests in order to validate the model results. The contractor shall support the Client in the definition 15
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 of this set of tests and during their execution on site. On site activities will be scheduled subject to availability of contractor staff and COVID-19 restrictions. The deliverable of this sub-task shall be a report of test, including an assessment of the delivered power profile to that specified in the reference nuclear power plant generator curve provided as part of Task 1.
Task 3: NRC technical meeting support Under this task, the contractor shall support NRC meetings with its stakeholders to communicate the analytical work completed in Tasks 1 and 2. The level of effort is not expected to exceed three (3) staff for three (3) full working days.
Task 4: Facility Engineering Design and Modification Under this task, if the results of sub-ask 2.2 determine the facility is capable of providing an acceptable energy delivery profile, but requires facility modification to do so, then the contractor shall perform the following Tasks if exercised by the NRC.
Task 4.1: Engineering Design Specification (Optional Task 2) *(Note: If work for this optional task is to be authorized, it shall be authorized by mutual agreement of the parties by execution of a bilateral modification to the contract.)
Under this sub-task the contractor shall perform a detailed engineering design specification to implement the analysis developed in sub-task 2.2. The deliverable for this sub-task shall be a detailed engineering specification including drawings, calculations, Bills of Material, estimates, etc. suitable to estimate a cost estimate of facility modification.
This task is an option and not part of the base contract.
Task 4.2: Facility Modification (Optional Task 3) *(Note: If work for this optional task is to be authorized, it shall be authorized by mutual agreement of the parties by execution of a bilateral modification to the contract.)
The contractor shall modify its facility to mimic a generator fed energy decrement HEAF event. Documentation of the final as designed and as built modification shall be provided to the NRC COR. Post-modification power system delivery confirmation test(s) shall be performed, and results provided to the NRC COR.
This task is an option and not part of the base contract.
Task 5: Full scale decrement testing Under this task, the contractor shall perform four (4) medium voltage decrement curve tests at the facility.
If completion of Task 2 determines that testing to mimic a generator fed decrement curve is not feasible, this testing shall proceed following standard HEAF testing protocol at a lower voltage and longer duration that provides a similar total energy delivered to that of a generator fed HEAF decrement event. The actual test parameters shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC COR prior to performing the tests. The voltage levels will be medium voltage between 4,000 and 7,200 Vac at a nominal start frequency of 60 hertz. It is expected that the duration of the arc test will be a minimum 6 seconds.
Preparations for the testing will require the use of a climate controlled and environmentally protected work space large enough to house all test equipment and sufficient work area to stage scientific instrumentation.
The size of the anticipated equipment will be up two (2), three vertical section medium voltage switchgear, or a two (2) 12 foot section of medium voltage non-segregate phase bus duct. Duration of use will be 12 days with 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> access.
16
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 NRCs electrical contractor (Brendan Stanton, Inc. [BSI]; NRC-HQ-60-17-C-0008) will deliver the test equipment to the facility and assist with installation of the test equipment into test cell. The test facility shall connect the equipment to the test facilities power supply. The NRC will also have Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on site prior to, during, and after, the test series to install scientific measurement devices and photometric equipment to capture data for the NRC from these experiments.
All testing shall be documented in a test report that includes the facility configurations and characteristics, pre-and post-test observations, and electrical and pressure data plots. In addition, the electronic data files, including voltage, current, pressure, duration, temperature, from each experiment shall be provided to the NRC COR.
Task 6: Additional full scale decrement testing (Optional Task 4) *(If work for this optional task is to be authorized, it shall be authorized by the Contracting Officer by contract modification,)
Under this task, two (2) additional full scale decrement testing shall be performed by the contractor. The actual test parameters shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC COR prior to performing the tests. The voltage levels will be medium voltage between 4,000 and 7,200 Vac at a nominal start frequency of 60 hertz. It is expected that the duration of the arc test will be a minimum 6 seconds.
Preparations for the testing will require the use of a climate controlled and environmentally protected work space large enough to house all test equipment and sufficient work area to stage scientific instrumentation.
The size of the anticipated equipment will be up two (2), three vertical section medium voltage switchgear, or a two (2) 12 foot section of medium voltage non-segregate phase bus duct. Duration of use will be 6 days with 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> access.
NRCs electrical contractor (BSI, NRC-HQ-60-17-C-0008) will deliver the test equipment to the facility and assist with installation of the test equipment into test cell. The test facility shall connect the equipment to the test facilities power supply. The NRC will also have SNL and NIST on site prior to, during, and after, the test series to install scientific measurement devices and photometric equipment to capture data for the NRC from these experiments.
All testing shall be documented in a test report that includes the facility configurations and characteristics, pre-and post-test observations, and electrical and pressure data plots. In addition, the electronic data files, including voltage, current, pressure, duration, temperature, from each experiment shall be provided to the NRC COR.
At this time, the need for the two additional the extent of facility modification is unknown and will only be determined subsequent to completion of Task 2. Therefore, this task is an option and not part of the base contract.
C.5 Reporting Requirements C.5.1 Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR)
The contractor shall provide a Monthly Letter Status Report which consists of a technical progress report and financial status report for months when work is performed (MLSR template attached). This report will be used by the Government to assess the adequacy of the resources proposed by the contractor to accomplish the work contained in this SOW and provide status of contractor progress in achieving tasks and producing deliverables. The report shall include contract/order summary information, work completed during the specified period, milestone schedule information, problem resolution, travel plans, and staff hour summary.
17
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 C.5.2 Final Report The contractor shall provide a final report summarizing the work performed and the results and conclusions under this contract/order.
C.6 List of Deliverables Deliverables of this contract are identified in the following table.
Section # Task Deliverable Due Date Format Submit to C.4 1 Simulation 4 months after Word or PDF CO/COR modeling project initiation findings report C.4 2.1 Report of 2 months after Word or PDF CO/COR generator completion of feasibility Task 1.
C.4 2.2 Report on 1 months after Word or PDF CO/COR testing contract requirement modification C.4 2.2 Report on 4 months after Word or PDF CO/COR detailed contract engineering modification evaluation C.4 2.3 Scaled test 4 months after Word or PDF CO/COR report exercise of Option by both parties C.4 4.1 Final 4 months after Word or PDF CO/COR modification exercise of design Option by both document parties C.4 4.2 Facility 4 months after Word or PDF CO/COR Modification exercise of Option by both parties C.4 5 Test Report 6 weeks Word or PDF CO/COR following completion of testing C.4 5 Electronic Data 6 weeks Data file CO/COR Files following (DAT, SID, completion of XML, .xls, testing etc).
C.4 6 Test Report 6 weeks Word or PDF CO/COR following completion of testing C.4 6 Electronic Data 6 weeks Data file CO/COR Files following (DAT, SID, completion of XML, .xls, testing etc).
18
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 C.5.1 Monthly Letter 20 th of the P P Word CO/COR MLSR Status Report following month Document C.5.2 Final Report 30 days prior to Word COR Final contract Document Report expiration C.7 Required Materials, Facilities, Hardware/Software The contractor shall provide the following facilities:
- 1) Task 5 - testing facility
- 2) Task 5 - equipment assembly area
- 3) Task 6 - testing facility
- 4) Task 6 - equipment assembly area C.8 Release of Publications Any documents generated by the contractor under this contract/order shall not be released for publication or dissemination without CO and COR prior written approval.
C.9 Place of Performance The work to be performed under this contract/order will be primarily performed at the contractors facility.
C.10 Recognized Holidays N/A C.11 Hours of Operation N/A C.12 Certification and License Requirements The facility shall be ISO 17025 certified.
C.13 Key Personnel and Qualification Requirements The following positions have been designated as key personnel:
- 1. Power systems modeling expert - a degree in engineering with the knowledge and ability to perform the analytical tasks described in this statement of work.
- 2. Test engineer - a degree in engineering with knowledge and ability to perform testing described in the statement of work.
C.14 Contractor Travel It is expected that one (1), three (3) person, three (3) day trip to NRC HQ in Rockville, MD will be needed to communicate the findings from Tasks 1 and 2.
19
31310019C0011 P00001 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Contractor will be authorized travel expenses consistent with the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) and the limitation of funds specified in the travel line item of this contract/order. All travel requires prior written Government approval from the CO, unless otherwise delegated to the COR.
C.15 Data Rights The NRC shall have unlimited rights to and ownership of all deliverables provided under this contract/order, including reports, recommendations, briefings, work plans and all other deliverables. All documents and materials, to include the source codes of any software, produced under this contract/order are the property of the Government with all rights and privileges of ownership/copyright belonging exclusively to the Government.
These documents and materials may not be used or sold by the contractor without prior written authorization from the CO. All materials supplied to the Government shall be the sole property of the Government and may not be used for any other purpose. This right does not abrogate any other Government rights.
C.16 Incremental Development for Software N/A C.17 Section 508 - Information and Communication Technology Accessibility N/A C.18 Applicable Publications (Current Editions)
N/A 20