ML20249B811
| ML20249B811 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1998 |
| From: | Ting P NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | John Miller UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORP. (USEC) |
| References | |
| 70-7001-97-208, EA-98-342, NUDOCS 9806240250 | |
| Download: ML20249B811 (2) | |
Text
_ _.
S"o ug y=~
4 UNITED STATES E
NUCLEAR FIEGULATORY COMMISSION If WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
+
June 19, 1998 EA 98-342 Mr. J. II. Miller Vice President - Production United States Enrichment Corporation Two Democracy Center 6903 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20817 SUBJEC f: RESPONSE TO PADUCAll INSPECTION REPORT 70-7001/97-208
Dear Mr. Miller:
This ref ers to your December 29 1997, response to the Notice of Violation (NOVs) and the s
Notice of Deviation (NOD) transmitted to you by our letter dated November 28,1997, with Inspection Report 70-7001/97-208. We have examined your response and found that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We will examine the implementation of your corrective actions during future inspections.
In your response, you denied the deviation 97-208-01. Your denial to the deviation was on the basis that "There is no requirement to obtain NRC concurrence for a change to a commitment of the type referenced in the NOD." You further indicated that your commitment revision process is based on the Nuclear Energy Institute's Guidance Document," Guideline for Managing NRC Commitments" which has been endorsed by the NRC and which allows the licensee to proceed with a change if the NRC is "... as soon as practicable after the change is approved by licensee management, but before any committed completion date."
Based on your response of December 29,1997, we have concluded that the findings issued in the inspection Report 97-208 were valid and occurred as stated. We agree, however, that there was no requirement to obtain NRC concurrence prior to changing the subject commitment.
/
Accordingly, the deviation is hereby rescinded. In this case, your representations in your letter of p
December 29,1997, will be taken as your commitments to resolve the deficiency.
/
70 b Id
.a b a d
~~
9906240250 990619 "-
PDR ADOCK 07007000 C
PDR; gy
i 1
2 s
The rescinded deviation is an example of a failure to make timely notification of changes to commitments, a topic that was most recently discussed at the May 15,1998, Senior Management Meeting between USEC and the NRC. We appreciate your cooperation in making reliable commitments and providing timely notification of changes.
Sincerely,
)
f I
/
a Philip 'ing,Chich Operations Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS Docket 70-7001 Certificate No. GDP-1 cc: Mr. Iloward Pulley, General Manager Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant l
p
{
L
N W&a_ hyg.
i June 19, 1998 l
N 2
.y The rescinded deviation is an example of a failure to make timely notification of changes to commitments, a topic that was most recently discussed at the May 15,1998, Senior Management Meeting between USEC and the NRC. We appreciate your cooperation in making reliable commitments and providing timely notification of changes.
Sincerely, Original signed by Philip Ting Philip Ting, Chief Operations Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS Docket 70-7001 Certificate No. GDP-1 cc: Mr. Iloward Pulley, General Manager Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File 70-7001 AFCOB r/f >
Milorn, FSPB PDR, LDPR FCSS r/f Case File NMSS r/f RPierson, FSPB KO'Brien, Rlli PIliland, Rill PPatel, FSPB DOCUMENT NAME Morcy:a:\\padresp.gdp
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE OFC FCOB FCOB FCOB FCOB E
NAME PIlarich DMorey*
WTrypidski PJ[I DATE
/ /98 6/18/98 8 /1/98
/ M/98 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY
- P. Ililand, Rlli, and Enforcement concurred by email 6/18/98