ML20248M256
| ML20248M256 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/10/1998 |
| From: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248M243 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901298 99901298-98-01, 99901298-98-1, NUDOCS 9806150209 | |
| Download: ML20248M256 (1) | |
Text
,
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Nuclear Logistics incorporated Docket No.: 99901298 Fort Worth, Texas Report No.: 98-01 During an NRC inspection conducted on January 14-16, and March 2-6,1998, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:
10 CFR Part 21.21, " Notification of failure to comply or existence of a defect and its evaluation,"
requires in part that, (a) Each individual, corporation, partnership, dedicating entity, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall adopt appropriate procedures to: (1) Evaluate deviations and failures to comply to identify defects and failures to comply associated with 3
substantial safety hazards as soon as practicable, and, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) l of 9 21.21, in all cases within 60 days of discovery.
l
- Contrary to the above, NLI did not adopt a procedure to adequately ensure that identified deviations and failures to comply were evaluated. Procedure NLl-QUAL-08, which NLl adopted to implement the provisions of Part 21 did not discuss the aspects of evaluations of deviations and failures to comply that are delineated in Section 21.21(a) of 10 CFR Part 21. NLi also received a non-cited violation in NRC Report 99901298/96-01 for its failure to have adopted an appropriate procedure to implement the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21.. (Violation 99901298/98-l 01-01)
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement Vil).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Nuclear Logistics Incorporated, is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Chief, Quality Assurance, Vendor inspection and Maintenance Branch, Division of Reactor Controls and Human Factors, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, within 30 days of the date of the letter l
transmitting this Notice of Violation. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice I
of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or
- include previous docketed corresponded)ce, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the l
response time.
i' Dated at Rockville, Maryland -
this /CM ay of June 1998 j
d 9806150209 990610
~
PDR SA999 ENVNUCLO 99901298 PDR 7
Io
.