ML20248J652
| ML20248J652 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1989 |
| From: | Zimmerman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248J648 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-89-04, 50-312-89-4, NUDOCS 8904140499 | |
| Download: ML20248J652 (2) | |
Text
-
E APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District Docket No. 50-312 i
Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-54 14440' Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 i
During an NRC inspection conducted on January-14 through March 3, 1989, l
violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the l
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:
I A.
10 CFR, Part 50, Appendix B, states, in part:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."
1.
Rancho Seco Administrative Procedure (RSAP) 0703, Revision 0, SUPPLIER DISPOSITION REQUEST (SDR), Section 5.2, Review and Processing of Supplier Proposed Changes, states, in part:
"5.2.7 If the item being evaluated is for a Work Request (WR) (replacement part) an ECN is required."
i Contrary. to the above, an ECN was not initiated for a replacement part, a' rebuilt goveraor, for Auxiliary Feed Pump '(P-318), which was installed on January 31, 1989 in response to SDR #88-26893-304.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
2.
Aux. Feed Pump Turbine (Terry Turbine) Operation and Maintenance Manual (MS.06-57),Section IV
" Starting", states, in part:
...Open the throttle valve gradually to increase turbine speed, checking the speed frequently with a speed indicator; j
and as the turbine approaches full speed, the governor should come into action smoothly and partially close the governor valve to control the speed. When the governor apparently has control, continue to open the throttle valve slowly.
This should not increase the speed.
Now, fully open the throttle valve, and the turbine is ready for load...."
and Section 2, states in part:
"Before making any adjustment to an operating gover5or on a prime mover, check that the overspeed shutdown system is operating properly."
Contrary to the above, on January 31, 1989:
1 8904140499 890331 i
ADOCK0500g2 DR l
. i Maintenance Work Request, MWR 0145212D-0, which controlled the post-maintenance testing of the Terry Turbine, did not contain these applicable instructions for performing the test.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
3.
Rancho Seco Quality Manual (RSQM),Section XI, Revision 3, " Test Control" states, in part:
"4.3 Test Procedures and Instructions, shall be reviewed by the applicable organizations for technical content."
Contrary to the above, on January 31, 1989 MWR 01452120-0 was not reviewed by the applicable organization (Plant Performance Engineering) for technical content prior to performance of the test.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, The Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Anthony D'Angelo, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM4ISSION
%P w Divisio{fsherma Q, eting Director Roy P.
n of Reactor Safety and Projects Dated at Walnut Creek California this 3Ff day of Ma/bh1989
_