ML20247Q089

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Second Rept of Parties & Request for Dismissal of Graterford Inmates Contention & Termination of Proceeding, Per ASLB 890602 Memorandum & Order.Document Notes That as of 890718,100 Employees Would Serve as Ambulance Drivers
ML20247Q089
Person / Time
Site: Limerick 
Issue date: 07/21/1989
From: Conner T
CONNER & WETTERHAHN, PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Harbour J, Kline J, Margulies M
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#389-8949 OL, NUDOCS 8908070041
Download: ML20247Q089 (5)


Text

r n. :-@:] '

..,s, E-l d ',[

@j@ g' F

,""n~

l

' t.Aw, o rricEs

{

iD; '

. CONNER Oc WETTERHAHN,' P.C.

00(fiH D I

17d7 PENN SYLVA NI A AVEN UE, N. W. i

UMN$

4 fraor a. cowws's,. n....

  • ^ 8.HI N G TO N. D. C. 2 0 0 06 i

L nmamm or, warrzamimw -

3==== s m=====

.~89 :JUL 25 P4 :02 l

l wtLe w. wicuots

-q q 0na'wMAND O.BBCNNORFER i

')

,Z 0 Fila ^

t* * " 3-3500 -

1 s

l W

' DOCMi di UA I

+

N<.4 f B A A CABLE ADS.MS' ATOMLAW w

fJuly,21,'1989 ijp s

y;

l n

Morton-B;^Margulies, Chairman

' Jerry. Harbour

,f Atomic Safety.and Licensing Atomic' Safety and t

Licensing Board Panel-7 BoardyPaneli U.~S.

Nuclear Regulatory.

, yU

'U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory

-Commission' Commission

-Washington,yD.C. L20555 Washington, D.C.

.20555 0

m.

.: Jerry l R. < Kline -

..)

" Atomic. Safety' and: Licensing 6

'tBoard PanelL j

s

.U.!S.'Nucler Regulatory Li Commission' j

Washington, D.C.

L20355-lu In the Matter of

'l Philadelphia Electric Company 5I

o

...(Limerick' Generating Station, Units 1 and 2)'

Docket Nos. 50-352-OL and 50-353-OL 5

Gentlemen:

i

'l

,.. Pursuant to' the Licensing Board's

" Memorandum and i

Order." dated June 2, 19fi9, concerning the. stipulation in the j

captioned -proceeding for purposes'of resolving the conten-tion of'the Graterford inmates without the need for a formal I

hearing, I am transmitting the "Second Report of the Parties l

and Request.for Dismissal of the Graterford Inmates' Conten-l m

b tion and Termination of the Proceeding" dated today.

is

. This document notes that as of July 18,

1989, one i

hundred employees of the Department of Corrections who would serve as bus-and-ambulance drivers in an actual radiological

) _

emergency have completed their training.

1 h

4 accordingly, the parties hereby request that the Board p

and terminate the proceeding, as provided 'in the

{

4

. dismiss Board's Memorandum and Order.

j l

l Each. party's counsel has advised me that he will affix his signature and forward it to the Board today.

They will q)3 D

L1 h..

p In turn,-I-will assemble all six also forward a' copy to me.

signature.pages to a revised copy.of the report and request for. dismissal-.and forward it to the Board.

Sincerely, y

. /,9f2

. 'JL > tll)

?-

Troy B$?j p Conner, Jr.

Counsel for the. Licensee

. Enclosure cc: Service List l

i

~. - -. - -. - _. _ _ _ _ _

.s

i n'

[in.

3:

O

' UNI'ILL STATES-OF AMERICAL NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'~

Befo're' the Atomic Safety and" Licensing Board

..L Do'cket Nos. 50-352-In the Matter of-

')

50-353

)

)

,Ph'iladelphia Electric Company

)

(Limerick Generating. Station,

-)

8 9 -5 8 7-0 3-OL' -R..

. Units'1:andJ2):

-)

. ASLBP ' No'. -

SECOND. REPORT OF.THE PARTIES AND.

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF THE GRATERFORD-9.:

INMATES' CONTENTION AND TERMINATION

'OF'THE PROCEEDING

.By Memorandum and' Order-' dated June 2, 1989,-the Atomic Safetyl and' Licensing' Board ~ (Licensing Board or Board) accepted ! and approved the Stipulation of the parties and

. interested Commonwealth and federal agencies with, respect to the' remaining contention of the inmates of the State Correc-tional ' Institution at Graterford, except insofar as the Stipulatio'n provided for the termination and dismissal of the proceeding.

.The Licensing Board stated that it would retain' control over dismissal of the proceeding and 5:ould act at the request of the parties when the Board was sat-

.isfied that the requirements for dismissal were met.

The Board-further stated that it would terminate this proceeding at the request of the parties when it was satisfied that the requirements for doing so had been met.

Specifically, the Board stated that it would have no

\\

hesitancy about passing upon a request by the parties for 1

l

y

.c W

h,

w.

s

,.m.-

xny

. 2:.

]-d, M

' dismissal'~ and ? termination of the. proceeding when 75 ofLthe-kw the' condition provided for-in the-

- drivers:had been~ trained, Stipulation'.

TheE. Licensing Board ~ therefore directed. the parties ' to

,~

submit.at the end 'of' 30 ' days a. progress; report specifying

!thefstepsLalready taken to' implement the requirements oflthe 9

Stipulation andia" schedule-for completing'the remainder.

In

' accordance with this directive, counsel for' Philadelphia Electric 1 Company (PECO), for itself and on behalf of the

other.' parties, submitted'the first report of the parties.to the Licensing Board on June 3 0,- 1989.

At that ~ time,. the parties 1 reported that. arrangements had been made among the Pennsylvania -Department of Corrections, the Pennsylvania

' Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) and Schneider Engineers-to schedule and hold driver training sessions at various

-locations.

As of the time of the first report, a total of 44 Department personnel had completed their training.

As' anticipated, additional training sessions have been held since that time.

As of July 18, 1989, a total of 100 employees of the Department of Corrections who would serve as bus - and ambulance drivers in an actual radiological emergency have completed their training.

Accordingly, the

.present number of trained employees meets the requirements.

of the revised Radiological Emergency Response Plan for the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, which calls for 66-trained-drivers and an additional 34 in reserve.

7..

m%'

p W-3--

li!

LAs presiously reported:toLthe Board,lthe Department'is'

,4

.now' preparing' changes _to.its Radiological Emergency Response 1

. Plan.-. Revisions' pertinent to training will be reviewed ~by the-inmates' counsel and' technical consultant 'upon_ the n

n, anticipate _'d' availability of.the-revisions in August 1989.

On.the basis of the foregoing, the parties agree'and stipulate that the - remaining contention.of the Graterford

. inmates may now be. dismissed and the proceeding be' fore this

~

Licensing Board _ terminated. -

The Licensing ' Board is: hereby -

'requ'ested to enter an Order accordingly.

m Michael B.

Hirsch,.Esq.

Mark-J. Goodwin, Esq.-

Counsel for Federal Counsel for Pennsylvania Emergency Management Emergency Management ~ Agency Agency-

/td"71B. G.O 6 87

_ Angus R. Love, Esq.

Troy B./ Conner, Jr., EsgE Counsel.for Graterford Counsel'for Philadelphia Inmates Electric. Company Theodore G. Otto, III, Esq.

Joseph Rutberg, Esq.

Counsel for Pennsylvania

' Counsel for United States Department of Corrections Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff

' ~

Dated:

__ __