ML20247N496
| ML20247N496 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1989 |
| From: | Creel G BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612 NUDOCS 8908030023 | |
| Download: ML20247N496 (2) | |
Text
..
t BALTI M ORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER.P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 GEORGE C. CRECL vice passiota, Nuctran [Ntstow (300 teO-d e $fh -
July 26,1989 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Document Control Desk
SUBJECT:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Picat Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Revision to Commitment Made for NUR EG-0612
REFERENCE:
(a) Phase Two Report to NUREG 0612, dated March 1,1982 Gentlemere in Reference (a), we submitted our phase two report providing information requested by NUREG-0612,
- Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants." Our submittal defined
" hot" spent fuel as fuel which was removed from the reactor during a refueling (fuel shuffle) and for 45 days after the completion of that shuffle, was considered to be "ho t."
Additionally, we stated that mechanical stops would be installed to prohibit the spent fuel cask handling crane trolley from approaching closer than 25 feet to
" hot" spent fuel.
Our definition of " hot" spent fuel was conservative based on Figure 2.1 - 1 in NUREG-0612. It limited offsite dose to less than one-fourth of the 10 CFR 100 limits.
The definition of " hot" spent fuel should be ht.,ed on time after the shutdown of the plant and not time after removal of the last assembly from the reactor vessel. We feel the use of this definition will lircit the offsite dose to less than one-fourth of the 10 CFR 100 ilmits.
We intend to clarify our commitment to the NUREG more extensively in the future, but as an immediate action, are clarifying our definition of " hot" spent fuel to mean fuel which has resided in the core of a plant, shutdown within the last 45 days. We would appreciate notification of your concurrence with this clarification so that work which is being delayed due to the existing definition may proceed.
jfN B900030023 890726 f d)
ADOCK ON)%7 p
?DR P
n Document Control Desk e
July 26,1989 i
Page 2 Should you have any further questians regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours, a
f GCC/MDM/dtm cc:
D. A. Brune, Esquire J.
E.
Silberg, Esquire R. A.Capra, NRC S. A.McNeil,NRC W. T. Russell, NRC H. Eichenholz/V L. Pritchett, NRC T. Magette, DNR 1
1 l
l
.;