ML20247L380
| ML20247L380 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 05/19/1998 |
| From: | Dugger C ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20013J464 | List: |
| References | |
| W3F1-98-0100, W3F1-98-100, NUDOCS 9805220387 | |
| Download: ML20247L380 (38) | |
Text
._
y Entergy Operations, Inc.
/
Kdiona LA 70060-0751 Tel 504 739 6660 Charles M. Dugger c
s, dent. owares W3F1-98-0100 A4.05 PR ENCLOSURES 2 AND 3 CONTAIN PROPRIETARY INFORMATION May 19,1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Additional information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF-38-193 Gentlemen:
By letters dated March 27,1997 and supplemented by letters dated April 3,1997, July 21,1997, October 23,1997, November 13,1997, December 12,1997, January 21,1998, January 29,1998, March 23,1998 and May 1,1998, Waterford 3 proposed to amend Operating License NPF-38 to increase spent fuel storage capacity and increase the maximum fuel enrichment. The purpose of this submittal is to provide the additional structural assessment information requested by the NRC in an NRC/Entergy/Holtec telecon held on April 30.1998 regarding the spent fuel reracking effort and to submit errata change pages for Holtec International Report HI-971628, which was included in the March 27,1997 submittal. contains the tipover evaluation of a single isolated Holtec rack during the reracking installation process. contains user instruction pages from the DYNARACK user's manual and also contains DYNARACK execution instructions. contains the DYNARACK software and simulation input files necessary to perform the Holtec single rack tipover check simulations. This information is
\\k 43UOb1 CIA 1, q p E +c f s o v,
\\
\\ @ Vf u
i hh h$YB2 I
b Ob0 P
Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF-38-193 W3F1-98-0100 Page 2 May 19,1998 presented in Enclosure 3 as three 3.5" diskettes. contains supplemental displacement data for the Holtec rack tipover check simulations in all three orthogonal directions. contains two conceptual sketches of the fuel handling offset tool, which will be used to access the perimeter rack locations. contains errata corrections to Holtec International Report HI-971628 (submitted March 27,1997). These corrections represent the culmination of an Entergy review of the Holtec structural evaluation documentation. The changes involved clarification of the kinematic acceptance criteria, in Section 6.6.1.
on page 6-16, to demonstrate that an isolated rack would not tipover and four corrected displacement values on page 6-16. The changes do not represent any change in the conclusions discussed in the report.
The information in this submittal does not affect the previously provided determination of no significant hazards.
Please note that Enclosures 2 and 3 contain information that is considered proprietary pursuant to 10CFR2.790. In this regard, Entergy requests that these enclosures be withheld from public viewing. Please note that the respective Holtec affidavits pursuant to 10CFR2.790 are included with the enclosures, i
Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF-38-193 W3F1-98-0100 l
Page 3 May 19,1998 Should you have any questions or comments concerning this request, please contact Roy Prados at (504) 739-6632.
Very truly yours,
)
C.M. Dugger Vice President, Operations Waterford 3 CMD/RWP/rtk
Enclosures:
Affidavit Enclosures 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 (w/ Enclosures) cc:
E.W. Merschoff, NRC Region IV C.P. Patel, NRC-NRR (w/o Enclosures) cc:
J. Smith N.S. Reynolds NRC Resident inspectors Office Administrator Radiation Protection Division (State of Louisiana)
American Nuclear insurers
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the matter of
)
]
)
Entergy Operations, incorporated
)
Docket No. 50-382 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station
)
AFFIDAVIT Charles Marshall Dugger, being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says that he is Vice President Operations - Waterford 3 of Entergy Operations, incorporated; that he is duly authorized to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the attached Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF-38-193; that he is familiar with the content thereof; and that the matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
(-)~l~//k'ku&['s
/)
I aA -
Charles Marshall Dugger dV Vice President Operations - Waterford 3 STATE OF LOUISIANA
)
) ss PARISH OF ST. CHARLES
)
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the Parish and State I
above named this
-C O day of o r <-
.1998.
(
lW O
C 91 r <
Notary Public My Commission expires a' A}/.
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 I, Scott H. Pellet, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:
(1)
I am the Project Manager for Holtec International and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.
(2)
The information sought to be withheld is contained in the instruction sheets excerpted from the DYNARACK user's manual, included with enclosure 2 of the attached " Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF 38-193." The entire content of these pages is identified as being proprietary.
(3)
In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner, Holtec International relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom ofInformation Act ("FOIA"),5 USC Sec. 552(b)(4) and the Trade Secrets Act,18 USC Sec.1905, and NRC regulations 10CFR Part 9.17(a)(4),
2.790(a)(4), and 2.790(b)(1) for " trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" (Exemption 4).
The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought is all " confidential commercial information", and some portions also qualify under the narrower definition of " trade secret", within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Project v.
Nuclear Reguintory Commission, 975F2d871 (DC Cir.1992), and Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704F2d1280 (DC Cir.1983).
(4)
Some examples of categories of information which fit into the definition of proprietary information are:
Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including a.
supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by Holtec's competitors without license from Holtec International constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies; 1
l l
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 l
i b.
Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product.
Information which reveals cost or price information, production, capacities, c.
budget levels, or commercial strategies of Holtec International, its customers, or its suppliers; d.
Information which reveals aspects of past, present, or future Holtec International customer-funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Holtec International; e.
Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.
The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 4.a,4.b,4.d, and 4.e, above.
(5)
The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence.
The information (including that compiled from many sources) is of a sort customarily held in confidence by Holtec International, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by Holtec International. No public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties, including any required transmittals to the NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
Its initial designation as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in paragraphs (6) and (7) following.
(6)
Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge. Access to such documents within Holtec International is limited on a "need to know" basis.
2
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 (7)
The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist or other equivalent authority, by the manager of the cognizant marketing function (or his designee), and by the legal Operation, for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside Holtec International are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements.
(8)
The information classified as proprietary was developed and compiled by Holtec International at a significant cost to Holtec International. This information is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed tdstorical data and analytical results not available elsewhere. This information would provide other parties, including competitors, with information from Holtec International's technical database and the results of evaluations performed using codes developed by Holtec International. Release of this information would improve a competitor's position without the competitor having to expend similar resources for the development of the database. A substantial effort has been expended by Holtec International to develop this information.
(9)
Public. disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to Holtec International's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of Holtec International's comprehensive spent fuel storage technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology, and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process.
The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by Holtec International.
The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.
3
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 Holtec International's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the Holtec International experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.
1 The value of this information to Holtec International would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive Holtec International of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing these very valuable analytical l
tools.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
)
)
ss:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON
)
j Scott H. Pellet, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
l That he has read the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.
i Executed at Marlton, New Jersey, this 8th day of May 1998.
(
Scott H. Pellet Holtec International day of Ny Subscribed and sworn before me this
,1998.
N h
i' ARIA C. PEPE i
4 NOTARY PU;UO OF NEW JERSEY M/ Comm!ssion Expires AprJ 25,2000
ENCLOSURE 1 1
1 L______
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 l
I, Scott H. Pellet, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:
(1)
I am the Project Manager for Holtec International and have been delegated the function of reviewing the infonnation described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.
(2)
The information sought to be withheld is contained in the 3.5" floppy disks included with enclosure 3 of the attached " Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NPF 38-193." These disks contain DYNARCK software and input and output files associated with the Waterford Licensing Amendment Application. The entire content of these disks is identified as be'mg proprietary.
(3)
In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner, Holtec International relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 USC Sec. 552(b)(4) and the Trade Secrets Act,18 USC Sec.1905, and NRC regulations 10CFR Part 9.17(a)(4),
2.790(a)(4), and 2.790(b)(1) for " trade secrets and commercial or fm' ancial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" (Exemption 4).
The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought is all " confidential commercial information", and some portions also qualify under the narrower definition of " trade secret", within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critien1 Mau Energy Proiect v.
Nuclear RegnIntnry Commission,975F2d871 (DC Cir.1992), and Public Citi7en Health Research Group v. FDA,704F2d1280 (DC Cir.1983).
(4)
Some examples of categories of information which fit into the definition of proprietary information are:
a.
Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by Holtec's competitors without license from Holtec International constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies; I
1
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 b.
Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product.
c.
Information which reveals cost or price information, production, capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Holtec International, its customers, or its suppliers; d.
Information which reveals aspects of past, present, or future Holtec International customer-funded development plans and programs of potential conunercial value to Holtec International; e.
Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.
The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 4.a,4.b,4.d, and 4.e, above.
(5)
The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence.
The information (including that compiled from many sources) is of a sort customarily held in confidence by Holtec International, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by Holtec International. No public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties, including any required transmittals to the NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
Its initial designation as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in paragraphs (6) and (7) following.
(6)
Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, the person most likely to be acquainted with the value l
and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge. Access to such documents within Holtec International is limited on a "need to know" basis.
2
AFMDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 (7)
The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist or other equivalent authority, by the manager of the cognizant marketing function (or his designee), and by the legal Operation, for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside Holtec International are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate I
need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements.
9 (8)
The information classified as proprietary was developed and compiled by Holtec International at a significant cost to Holtec International. This information is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed historical data and analytical results not available elsewhere. This information would provide other parties, including competitors, with information from Holtec International's technical database and the results of evaluations performed using codes developed by Holtec International. Release of this information would improve a competitor's position without the competitor having to expend similar resources for the development of the database. A substantial effort has been expended by Holtec International to develop this information.
(9)
Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to Holtec International's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of Holtec International's comprehensive spent fuel storage technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the l
technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical l
methodology, and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process.
l The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by Holtec International.
The precise vslue of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the l
correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.
I 3
(-
I AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10CFR2.790 Holtec International's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the Holtec International experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.
The value of this information to Holtec International would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive Holtec International of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing these very valuable analytical tools.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
)
)
ss:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON
)
l Scott H. Pellet, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he has read the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.
Executed at NIarlton, New Jersey, this 8th day of May 1998.
Scott H. Pellet Holtec International Subscribed and sworn before me this day of N%
,1998.
l V '
t 8, ARIA C. PEPE NOTARY PUEUO OF ION JERSEY My Comm!ssion Expirca April 25,2000 4
Enclosura 1 to W3F1-98-0100 ENCLOSURE 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NPF 38-193 HOLTEC RACK TIPOVER EVALUATION The evaluations performed to address rack tipover are briefly discussed in the first paragraph of Section 6.1 a:1d Section 6.6.1.a of the Holtec International Report Hl-971628 (submitted on March 27,1997). This check is performed to establish kinematic stability of a single rack within the pool. A single isolated (with no fluid coupling) rack is considered to represent the bounding condition for the interim configurations which would be experienced during the reracking process. The tipover checks were performed for both the Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) and the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) under various fuel loading conditions. The applied acceptance criteria are taken from Appendix D to SRP 3.8.4, Section (6) and SRP 3.8.5, Section (5).
The Holtec rack cbsen for tipover analysis was a 10x11 cell rack located in the Spent Fuel Pool (SFP). This rack was chosen because:
Neither the Cask Storage Pit racks nor the Refueling Canal racks will be loaded with e
fuel until the entire assemblage of racks in that particular location are installed.
Therefore, adjacent racks and walls will preclude tipover of loaded racks in these two pool areas.
The 10x11 cell rack represents the largest aspect (length / width) ratio of all SFP racks. The other SFP racks are square (10x10 and 11x11).
Summary results are shown on pages 4 and 5 of this enclosure.
Several conservatism are included in this tipover analysis. Some of these conservatism are:
- 1. An increased value (1600 lb. X 121/110 = 1760 lb.) has been assumed for the fuel assembly weight to take into account the additional mass that would be present for the 11X11 cell rack. The actual fuel assembly weight is slightly less than 1600 pounds.
- 2. The tipover analysis was performed for a single isolated Holtec rack with no fluid coupling (100" gap assumed in all directions to nearest wall surface). This is conservative since a rack with loaded fuel will never be located within the pool without having at least one adjacent surface with a small fluid gap (either rack or wall), resulting in fluid coupling on that side.
- 3. This tipover analysis incorporated multipliers of 1.1 for SSE and 1.5 for OBE for all three orthogonal direction time history accelerograms. A more realistic approach would be to apply the earthquakes without any multipliers and compare the ratio of
f Enclosura 1 to W3F1-98-0100 Page 2 of 21 limiting displacements to computed displacements with the 1.1 and 1.5 acceptable safety factor values for SSE and OBE, respectively. For example, note that the limiting displacement for tipover of a fuel rack is the displacement of the top of the rack relative to the bottom of the rack equal to the maximum span between pedestals. A relative displacement of this magnitude would cause the rack centroid to reach the envelope of the pedestals.
t The simulations performed represent those expected to be the bounding cases from the possible cases or conditions, and are chosen based on experience. The number of
- simulations and variations in parameters are chosen with the intent to produce the greatest displacements.
i In order to tip over, the centroid of the rack would have to displace sufficiently to be l
placed above the pedestal location. Based on the Holtec rack pedestal locations, overturning would require the displacement to exceed a value of approximately 39.1",
not accounting for the additional width provided by half the pedestal diameter. By ignoring the movement at the bottom of the rack, the maximum top of rack displacement of 7,77"(Run 3, table on page 4) can be roughly converted into a rack centroid displacement by dividing by two to give approximately 3.9". This would provide a factor of safety of approximately 10. Therefore, a Holtec rack overturning from a seismic event during the short installation period is not possible.
Summary results are provided from the tipover simu;ations performed for the Holtec racks. The conditions for these simulations are conservatively chosen to maximize the displacements which would occur under the unlikely situation of a SSE event taking place during the rack installation phase. The corresponding loads and stress factors are also conservatively reported for the conditions of a single isolated rack.
The normal design conditions for the completely installed racks provide significant fluid coupling between racks. The displacements, stress factors, and pedestal loads presented in the simulations described in this enclosure do not include fluid coupling on any of the four sides of the rack. The earthquake multipliers (1.1 for SSE and 1.5 for OBE) are also conservative conditions used in this analysis. The maximum stress factors and pedestal loads for the normal storage conditions (subsequent to the installation process with all racks in place) were provided in Sections 6.8 and 6.9 of Holtec International Report HI-971628. (Note: Also see Enclosure 6 of this submittal.)
The results from the normal condition evaluation are themselves conservative, due to the use of the heavy fuel assembly weight assumed, (See section 6.3.1 of Holtec Intemational Report HI-971628).
The displacements, stress factors, and pedestal loads presented in the simulations described in this enclosure are not appropriate to apply to the normal storage design basis configuration. The normal design conditions provide significant fluid coupling between racks, which is deliberately removed for the tipover checks to produce conservative displacements. This modeling practice also results in conservative pedestal loads and stress factors. The stress factors in these single rack simulations t
1 i
Enclosura 1 to l
W3F1-98-0100 Page 3 of 21 are all based on normal stress allowables. Therefore, the SSE stress factors are conservative by a factor of 2. The additional earthquake multipliers (1.1 for SSE and 1.5 for OBE) are also too conservative to apply for the design basis conditions. The maximum stress factors and pedestal loads for the normal storage conditions
. (subsequent to the installation process with all racks in place) were provided in Sections 6.8 and 6.9 of Holtec Intemational Report HI-971628.
The attached summary tables represent the maximum values that will occur at some point throughout the entire duration of the simulation. The maximum values for horizontal and vertical displacements result from a survey (at every time step) of all four corners of the spent fuel rack (at top and bottom) and from tracking the maximum absolute value of the displacements. Only the final maximum values are reported in the attached summary tables. The maximum displacement values will not necessarily occur at the same time instants. Therefore, the maximum displacements reported in this enclosure should not be used to establish the geometrical position of the rack at any particular time instant or to compare against simple rigid body motion computations.
The displacement results presented in this enclosure correspond to updated single simulations performed for a time-history duration of 20 seconds to be consistent with the Whole Pool Multi-Rack (WPMR) simulations. Results discussed during the telecon of April 30,1998, indicated a maximum displacement of approximate!y 5.12 inches.
These earlier results were based on simulations performed for shorter duration earthquakes. The correction of the earthquake duration to maintain consistency with the duration of the WPMR simulations resulted in some displacements which are larger than those discussed earlier. As may be seen in the following tables, the maximum displacements in all of the simulations remain less than the displacement required for tipover (approximately 39.1"). Therefore, sufficient margin against tipover is available.
0 eo p
h a Cm 84 n
e e t
t s
r u
r s
eeg i
f r n
r r e 9
og a t
es e X
t t
y me e o1 gva 8
5 4
8 6
9 2
6 X
n e e eh d lcFa op 2
5 4
9 6
6 5
0 8
l.
eh h p
2 g
cio t
n3 Pig 1
3 0
1 0
3 1
1 Y
mhe aht t
t n
EW ki A
eic lped t
cw R
cwn ishe t
a l
i ao n
rl e
A l
t cfo m
7 8
4 6
6 4
3 0
L pa s dt c l
t st,
k ale 1
6 5
3 6
2 6
4 8
E i
s) e e
2 ch g d e *".
c) 0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
U e
a3 at e lt d
rt oh lp) l
(
F f n n ae t
c pC oes H n iss e
wi De h
i E
1 4
6 1
1 1
9 T
eheT m mi t
h r
n ed mnc u
.vt L o
o n e ui Y
7 1
9 4
8 2
7 3
gi d
2 7
5 2
2 2
2 n
omtoO t
3 n
t ri ei im(
t oad H
b n
v o
is gO e
h o a
is nmn(
eh o x
u t
r r p M
n ei i ht c o
e xds imant sF t
f )
)
r im 4
e 7
7
(
9 2
7 7
6 t t u
s dmo arO n u X
4 2
7 1
8 6
8 2
d p p o
m pC o s 2
4 7
2 3
7 3
2 t es u t
r o
7 g
it lc o
ohe o u p2 a
n r
u ht u
i ms0 r
l n
l sso n ixde m e e
et cio t
a nh is is h
h n(
a mat etnlu d
d t
t r
E h e
e g
gme n
n emim eFf,o t
g d
d d
d
)
)
)
)
S f n
a a
e e
1 1
2 2
h Ok o
o c e s t
S o e
o o
d d
la laa ce scc
(
(
(
(
d L
L a
a e e e
e l
e 3 a
t t
t t
h L
la la n
n n
n d
dpah a
a o
ly ly o o o o o
o 1
L L
r eipt e 2. e sl h
le n
n ly ly e
t r0 e e e
e c
cdsm y g u
o o
lu lu e e e
e e
h b u F
g g F F
S S S S la lpZl a
i h rt 1 do wfof d o ia a
p r
o i
f r
D D
a e h e
e et d
",d e
c t n
inhs e 7e s u
Tet
- 7. i a 6
i n
d l
l dcea 7 ab o s g
g. pt sbe f
n in r
t r e k
o i
dcl x p g d
t i
iaae i oh s a nn ich O 2
8 2
8 2
8 2
8 iv*.
t
)
v k
le p e o F sf d 0 i r c d
i e ct o
c 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 9
et r alu b e f ir C y
yhe e r
t r
a e eF r n f
(
s n r t t s o
aoaf vw ee e.
y(
C h r g
ninoes e mn r
t t
e ig s g ph t ii f
ar ei n
oh cm t
ma aoao e
t s
e do impmt i m pf au ms r
ki et oolpr t
ul at 1
1 1
1 1,
1 1
1 y c yh n e t
se c
laiv c
sb o a 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 babt e t
a acd a
L d
daml ipet et F
r t
o p
t h y e e e s n yh s r
h edci t
et ma int in Tn e ad mi.a s
rl i
om c
memr pla e
t it r
r u s m
mn E E E E E E E E et ecic cisg g r
a f
el.ah n a s e S S S
S S S S S t
i du iv e s eE S S S S
S S S S e ot cdt r e o l
iy S
d d
2 e b pT m t r
t r 3
sZv ais e
c o k
kt
.uf a s cecne ot d nt ar r
r o
t s a
aeh w ylaies xe r u r r
t vf s
mTt at c oo ec r
f f
emn e o oe.
e o ie o lcf c e emzdfoo s
or i
f i r r r
nf 2
8 2
8 2
8 2
8 la nlal rap ut 0 D F
I I
I Y
l h E h pl Tsoes a Re 1
I I
F X X l
Y a inh ur c
i t
n t
s s d
r s
l o
i onoie. e hmof lt dt r
up s
n )th mat e t i t ee d d snv dment u oi rh ie e e t
cen e ca emomh diu gT n
lpivpmt l
i v
u 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 iwn.
R p o pi a edxt nr n
ar a xl ce anoe i s p
apatimi it o
d d
n melspc e "4 lo it
- a s a d
o sp 8n c loa sole oll aie h o
f u eLfiLAbd rT6ca l
t ea h v o
Te N1.
23 4.
l l'
e oBg h a en 0
p e e ho r85 Oa t
n f
r u
p i
r t i oga it s9 e e X
4 6
9 6
8 e
ind hg
. 4 1
5 X
n e t
y o1 gt n 2
na cFayw 2
7 6
1 7
8 5
0 eh h "7 o e l
i Z
I.
t 1
1 0
1 0
0 0
1 t
c n3Pb lo Y
mh 5.F in EW e
dl A
eic 3
t m
Or eo R
cwn i Ce t
s a l is t
cf n
ue e
A lpa t
1 st,
nt e dh m
1 5
5 2
1 2
0 8
L ot e
Z 5
7 2
4 3
3 2
4 E
is) e sd e
de".
mh o c) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U r n a (3 pi d
lae e gt lp)
F
)d ic pC chid ss e e De h
r i
e t
E a
e udi h
)
r 4
T eheT lp et c sv mc
.vt L h
1 6
7 0
3 6
(
9 n
ist e m
Y 9
9 6
0 7
6 9
1 oo u
lcp im
'(
5 2
n omtoO dt lg r
1 1
2 2
1 1
a e H
k hn o
n x
,3 is i u gO s
ct ee a
nmn at s M
r isa n
eii(
r ni e
xds m
imant f en h s u
o mio t
e 0
2 9
9 9
7 8
9 i
dmo f l X
7 4
1 5
2 2
3 5
d p p mui t
o b 2
1 t
1 2
2 1
3 1
tr es u o gd a
g ohe o t r n 1 t n
r t
ao 2 y ht r
sso n o
r h a lo g
e et cio be c i
hF u m h
h n (t a hsO t
et d
d t
t e nlu o m e
e t
rC t
g gme rh u g
d d
d d
)
)
)
)
t s ir.
a a
e e
1 1
2 2
n n emim sa o2 p
o o
d d
lao oc
(
(
(
(
e s e p0 4 r d
L L
a a
e l
t t
e e
e laa 1 o a
r t
l ce eu e s
o ly ly o
o o
o o
o L
L n
n n
n d
dpah hs h s s L
la la sl eipt wdt e
e e
e e
e e le n
n ly ly g c u
o o
lu lu e
e e
e c
cdsm
,nr a o F
g g F F
S S S S a
a do afo i
1 p r e
e lp lpZl r
9 p
D D
af 5.F c
,k e -
e e et d t
inhs e 3Oa e s s o in Tet isCr
(
l l
dc p
g g. pt c
t e
ea k 2.h s
n i k n
r f
le e o
id dcl x a0 h
f b
t T
nn iaae r r o iv*.
)
v a
eo F ir o
d d
ic t
ich O 2
8 2
8 2
8 2
8 i0 e
ef e c
y n f i C 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 9
et r h ds r
y yh e e a
f r t
r o
eF r n
(
rt f e a i o
aoaf vw on b mt C
a ninoes i a.
t pa mlu iiig s g ph t obt n hg t
n ua aoao e
of i t
t s v s
mpmt i m e
om e
r ki et h s e
do i
r at 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 y c yh n e t lt t u he o
nt c
c t u babt e a
as er t
a 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 v
L r
t e
mo d
daml emv F
p t
oip e e e s nr eo rt nhnedci e ect t ie ad f
imemr pl mh as k
rl dc c
t lpin r u a
ef t
e a mn E E E E E E E E it r
s a
sa et ecic. c t
i oig r
e B B B B
B B
B B
t c
s ac eE O O O O O O O O e ot cdt ela l
d iv e o l
r r
a r e S
d d
2ebpa esc y
t 3
sZv ai iht t
xl k
kt eo cecne ot d pT e eH a
aehwryl y f
r r u r at. a aw s
mTt at sgs r
r f
f e
ie ol oe emninf o
.s osio s n nf 2
o 2
8 2
8 2
8 l
cf c e emzimr i
f lt a
ut D
I F
I X Y Y a nlal ih ue Re I
Iv F
l X
I l
l hE h pl inhurTuo n
rTso sh t t et id s
r c t
dt
.e h'.ea onoie r r i t n vf o
n )thmo gf d d dment uio e n
e e t
ie r v s
i dl u cen mc oi iwn n
lpi p m temo ief t
loo u
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
v R
p o pi a ed i
a xr loa ar a xl ce adlsv it r
p apat m er o e f lu d
dmel r
s spospemt e
a s a nn hm
- sole ol aie h aoo l
i i
Ts elf LAbdrTscc to N1 23 4.
Enck)sure 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 6 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.id2 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D.
and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y: 29.1, 32.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
$ Revision:
3.47 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
151868.3 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
132121.2 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
26414.0 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
467.6 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
2.4666 2.7088 Baseplate corner:
2.3931 1.6829 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.021
.015
.144
.170
.203
.237
.016 Support pedestal:
.123
.033
.039
.036
.137
.145
.036 l
l l
I
Ern:Josure 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 7 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.id8 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y: 29.1, 32.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8 SRevision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov S
$ Revision:
2.5
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov S
$ Revision:
3.37 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
208227.4 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
135774.4 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
66090.5 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
412.9 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction t
Top corner:
4.2710 7.1388 Baseplate corner:
1.4344 1.1335 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.027
.029
.206
.186
.266
.309
.034 Support pedestal:
.126
.091
.092
.098
.182
.197
.086 l
Enclosune 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 8 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.if2 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (1bs.)
Fuel Loading: 110 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
. 0,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
)
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
SRevision:
2.5 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
Li'NAMIC IMPACT LOADS (1bs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
318459.6 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
234884.3 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
46938.4 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
356.2 (5) Maximum rack-to-wal; impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) IMximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
7.7735 5.9598 Baseplate corner:
6.8425 5.3911 I
MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS j
i Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.051
.035
.259
.264
.426
.492
.033 Support pedestal:
.218
.058
.053
.054
.238
.250
.057 i
l j
l to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 9 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.if8 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading: 110 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
. 0,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
324027.2 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
245049.3 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
111959.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
571.1 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
2.1919 2.4079 Baseplate corner:
.0978
.0879 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.054
.057
.255
.260
.437
.506
.053 Support pedestal:
.228
.140
.144
.130
.273
.292
.155
f Enck)sune 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 10 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I D.: dholtec.ix2 Seismic Loadir.g: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:-21.8,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2 SRevision:
3.47 S
SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov S SRevision:
2.5 S
SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov S SRevision:
3.37 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov S DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
154112.9 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
130222.9 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
26026.4 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
369.0 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
I Location:
X-direction Y-direction t
Top corner:
3.8159 3.8042 Baseplate corner:
3.7017 3.6388 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress _ actor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.022
.017
.134
.158
.204
.239
.016 Support pedestal:
.121
.029
.035
.032
.139
.147
.033 l
l l
I l
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 11 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.ix8 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:-21.8,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.foy $
$ Revision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
181863.0 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
129478.1 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
77986.5 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
535.3 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
7.6707 2.2096 Baseplate corner:
1.1456
.9373 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.034
.040
.180
.176
.269
.314
.042 Support pedestal:
.120
.104
.113
.112
.197
.218
.105 i
I l
Enck)sure 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 12 of 21 i
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.iy2 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
. 0, 24.0 (in.)
l Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2 i
$ Revision:
3.47 l
SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
j SRevision:
2.5 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov S
$ Revision:
3.37 $
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
190534.1 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
131758.6 I
(3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
26343.8 l
(4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
360.7 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
3.8651 2.7148 Baseplate corner:
2.7242 2.6882 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 l
I Above baseplate:
.031
.018
.180
.132
.236
.277
.017 Support pedestal:
.122
.033
.039
.035
.139
.147
.037 l
1 L - _ - __ _
i l
l Enclosuna 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 13 of 21 1
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.iy8 Seismic Loading: 1.1 x SSE Fuel Assembly I.D.
and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (1bs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
.0, 24.0 (in.)
i Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 S
SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
172131.9 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
138973.9 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
69397.3 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
519.C (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
2.2555 2.3947 Baseplate corner:
.5479
.4724 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.02b
.040
.172
.160
.219
.256
.033 Support pedestal:
.129
.081
.101
.087
.190
.207
.094 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 14 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.id2 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y: 29.1, 32.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
160599.5 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
126426.4 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
25187.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
304.3 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 i
i (7) Ma::imum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
1.7040 1.9145 Baseplate corner:
1.3127
.7255 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.023
.017
.184
.153
.198
.232
.016 Support pedestal:
.117
.031
.037
.033
.134
.142
.034 l
l 1
l E
_J
1 to W3F1-98-0100 l
l Page 15 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULT 3 OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.id8 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D.
and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (1bs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y: 29.1, 32.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47
)
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
q
$ Revision:
2.5 l
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37
{
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
j DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
I (1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
141655.8 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
128371.3 d
(3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
63391.3 I
(4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
318.9 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 f
(8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 l
MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
J l
Location:
X-direction Y-direction l
(
Top corner:
2.4185 1.8628 l
Baseplate corner:
1.6680 1.3684 j
i MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS I
l Stress factor:
R1 B2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 l
Above baseplate:
.016
.024
.165
.169
.238
.279
.026 Support pedestal:
.119
.083
.073
.089
.171
.189
.068 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ to VV3F1-98;-0100 Page 16 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.if2 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading: 110 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
.0,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37 $
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (1bs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
309912.4 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
198289.7 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
39657.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
301.5 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
2.1927 2.6674 Baseplate corner:
1.2687 2.2807 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.048
.032
.239
.227
.351
.409
.031 Support pedestal:
.184
.042
.050
.039
.192
.201
.054 l
l s
l to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 17 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.if8 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (1bs.)
Fuel Loading: 110 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
. 0,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynasi.fov S SRevision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov S l
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
280729.6 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
241962.2 f
(3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
117173.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
337.7 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
1.5867 1.9950 Baseplate corner:
.0853
.0935 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.042
.038
.266
.244
.425
.497
.044 Support pedestal:
.225
.158
.115
.146
.278
.306
.123
Enclosune 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 18 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.ix2 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:-21.8,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
$ Revision:
3.47 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
$ Revision:
3.37 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (1bs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
155162,0 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
107568.4 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
21344.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
300.0 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0
)
(6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximun. rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
3.2880 1.7304 Baseplate corner:
3.0394 1.7228 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.019
.016
.124
.163
.213
.249
.017 Support pedestal:
.100
.023
.030
.025
.113
.120
.028 l
i j
, to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 19 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.ix8 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:-21.8,
.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47 S
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov S
$ Revision:
2.5 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov $
SRevision:
3.37 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov S i
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
194772.8 1
(2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
132586.9 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
68579.8 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
356.0
]
(5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
1.2711 1.6620 Baseplate corner:
.5974
.4443 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS i
l
\\
Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.026
.028
.150
.187
.280
.325
.034 I
Support pedestal:
.123
.091
.102
.098
.169
.188
.095 l
l l
Enclosune 1 to VV3F1-98-0100 l
Page 20 of 21
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: Holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.iy2 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (1bs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
.0, 24.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.2
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov S
$ Revision:
3.37
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (1bs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
165838.0 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
115673.6 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
21519.9 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
345.9 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0 MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction I
Top corner:
2.3792 3.5864 Baseplate corner:
1.6273 3.5694 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS j
Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.024
.016
.160
.126
.185
.216
.019 Support pedestal:
.107
.029
.032
.033
.109
.115
.030 I
I l
l Enclosure i to VV3F1-98-0100 Page 21 of 21 l
SUMMARY
RESULTS OF 3-D SINGLE RACK ANALYSIS FOR RACK MODULE: holtec Holtec Run I.D.: dholtec.ly8 Seismic Loading: 1.5 x OBE Fuel Assembly I.D. and Weight:
Intact Fuel;;
1760.0 (lbs.)
Fuel Loading:
55 cells loaded; Fuel centroid X,Y:
. 0, 24.0 (in.)
Coefficient of friction at the bottom of support pedestal: 0.8
$ Revision:
3.47
$Logfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynam0.fov $
$ Revision:
2.5 S
SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas1.fov S
$ Revision:
3.37 SLogfile:
C:/ racks /dynam0/dynas2.fov $
DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS (lbs.)
(1) Maximum total vertical pedestal load:
158922.2 (2) Maximum vertical load in any single pedestal:
132153,7 (3) Maximum shear load in any single pedestal:
61610.2 (4) Maximum fuel-cell impact at one local position:
359.0 (5) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at baseplate:
.0 (6) Maximum rack-to-wall impact at rack top:
.0 (7) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at baseplate:
.0 (8) Maximum rack-to-rack impact at rack top:
.0
~~
MAXIMUM CORNER DISPLACEMENTS (in.)
Location:
X-direction Y-direction Top corner:
1.5895 2.1933 Baseplate corner:
.6516
.5308 MAXIMUM STRESS FACTORS Stress factor:
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Above baseplate:
.020
.030
.191
.136
.248
.289
.032 r
Support pedestal:
.123
.079
.092
.085
.169
.184
.086 l
t
(
l t
(
ENCLOSURE 4 t
P
' to W3F1-98-0100 Page 1 of 3 ENCLOSURE 4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NPF 38-193 SUPPLEMENTAL DISPLACEMENT DATA FOR SELECTED SIMULATIONS The displacements in all three orthogonal directions at all four top and all four bottom corners of the rack with the greatest horizontal displacement were requested. The following table includes this data for three selected Holtec rack tipover check simulations.
The comprehensive reporting of displacements are provided for Run 3 (IF2), which simulates a fully loaded rack with 0.2 coefficient of friction (COF), since this run results in the largest absolute displacement of any simulation. A sketch of the top and bottom rack plan views are also provided for this simulation. The sketch shows the initial position of the rack before the beginning of the simulation and an overlay of the displaced position of the rack at the instant in time when the maximum displacement occurs. This first simulation was executed for a 20 second duration event, to be consistent with the analyses performed for the entire assemblage of racks in the Whole Pool Multi-Rack runs.
As stated in Enclosure 1, the 0.2 COF loads do not control because the relative displacement of the top of the rack is smaller than for the 0.8 COF case once the bottom displacement is considered. Therefore, a second simulation was performed for the case with the second highest maximum absolute displacement, which was the 0.8 COF condition, half loaded in the X-direction, Run 6 (IX8). This simulation was also executed for a 20 second duration event.
The third simulation (Run 6a) is performed with the same parameters as the second simulation, but was executed for a shorter duration, as discussed in Enclosure 1.
e2 40 3 00 0 r8 520 2
u e
9 s
g
)
o1 a 1(
lcFP k
n3 c
EW a
1 81 6 5 7 21 3 R
7 862 1
23 30 1 400 f
620 3
3 0
o s
re m
dn o
1 9 3 64 6 260 a
C 6
2 3
450 840 360 s
m 63 30 002 n
o o
t i
t to a
B lu m
29 2 94 6 2 68 940 460 4.5 9 is 1
0 5
0 02 k
53 20 ca r
e h
t 7
6 28 553
- 6. 7 0 1 0. 9 l
fo 4
843 40 9
52 2 l
620 7
0 a
r
)
o 1
f
(
e k
88 m.
8 7
c 752
- 8. 740.
2 0.99 3
a e a
3 742 0
42 sg R
720 6
1 ea fo h p t
g s
e n r
r e
iaw m
79 4 8 97 824 so s
2
- 8. 1 1 olo h
233 rl o
2 720 e
C 73 6
1 3 41 0 t
f a
c o
gh i
p ne n
T it n
in se o n
59 3 7
22 6 d
820 6.9 8 1 3. 6 gr ig e
e 1
1 4 v
1 inu 63 7
1 3 51 0 r ig ef e
r b
e a
mh t
s f n ut t
oe nn n
nm i
e r
oe en m
ic XYZ XYZ XYZ mw e
t o
c ca o
el ch lp a
r p s
is Di e e s
D h
Ta i
r D
r i
8 8
e f
2 itn F
X X
e I
I I
d I
- s n
e a
t u
3 6
o 6
R N
1 2
_ to W3F1-98-0100 Page 3 of 3 u
- q. ________________,
I l
1i i
l h
i 1
1 I
1 i
i i
I l
l
=
X i
I I
i l
t I
i t
l 8
1 1
I I
1
'J___ _____________i
[g PLM F RE 17
INITIN. POSlilk MXlRM 015PU(E0 POSIT 3 i
i l
1 1
1 1
1 1
i i
l 1
i i
i l
i i
l i
1 i
i l
1 1
1 1
1 e
i I
l i
I 1
'7t________________m' i
PLAN F R C E T E i
l WATERRFD 3 RTEC RACK TIP00 DECK l
SIRATS: RLL RACK: 0.2 CEFFICIENT T FRICTim i
3 l
l
I I
J l
ENCLOSURE 5 i
C._
to W3F1-98-0100 Page 1 of 3 ENCLOSURE 5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NPF 38-193 FUEL HANDLING OFFSET TOOL SKETCHES The following pages contain sketches of the offset tool to be fabricated and installed temporarily to access the perimeter rack locations. The first sketch provides an elevation view of the tower, which will ride on the existing Spent Fuel Handling Machine (SFHM) Bridge. The tower has a similar design to the existing SFHM. The second sketch provides an isometric view of the fuel grapple.
I e
o to W3F1-98-0100 Page 2 of 3 I
1 t!d re-Mi st i
L4 Tomer Heist 13ee llose ii 120 125 s
M
'lli l
Itast tien i
I l
Ilote:
- 1. lesist. ret shoun. sill be a hesk to-heek meet reted for 6 tens. aquersted wie pendent ever TM l
li heist will teve e lasilt-in lead tell to senet the Poist poner of f in case of everleed er underleed. This food cell es prey arsuble ellowing cut of f linets to natch IF T
P"' '' " '(**' " '****"*"-
69--
-4 6
E4.15 I
ll Mint edi.~
Settiens e
i I
Pech Point on I
tiignrent Shoft i
I
\\- <
e, 1-n2
- reseI, crecei.
Asse%ly (see 2103 ELEVATION VIEW J
to W3F1-98-0100 Page 3 of 3 O
l 1
e, l
1
/
(h s
g
/
l g)WN-
- 3 N
x ISOVE"3IC VIP
-