ML20247J156

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Denies 890717 Appeal for Dh Grimsley 890609 Denial of FOIA Request for Documents 1-8 of App F.Records Continue to Be Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6)
ML20247J156
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/18/1989
From: Thompson H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Bauman L
GARDE, B.P.
References
FOIA-87-535, FOIA-89-A-23 NUDOCS 8909200206
Download: ML20247J156 (2)


Text

l 4-

[^

I

  1. p s.ascsou

'UmTED STATES o

'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

"%...../

SEP 18 IP89 l

Hs. Linda Bauman l

F0IA Coordinator IN RESPORSE REFER L

Law Offices of Billie Pirner Garde TO F01A-EbA-23 104 E. Wisconsin Avenue (F01A-87-535)

Appleton, WI 54911-4897

Dear Ms. Bauman:

This is in response to your letter dated July 17, 1989, ir. wtiich you appealed Mr. Donnie H. Grimsley's response dated June 9,1989. Mr. Grimsley's response denied portions of the records identified on Appendices F aM G subject to your Freedom of Information Act (F01A) request for copies of records related to Region IV.

This response will address the records identified on the teclosed copy of Appendix F, numbers I through 8, in which portions were withheld under FOIA Exemption 6.

Mr. Malsch's letter dated August 9,1989, responded regarding the records identified on Appendix G, numbers 1 through 5.

The Secretary of the Commission will respond under separate cover regarding t.he records identified on Appendix F, numbers 9 through 11.

Acting on your appeal, I have carefully reviewed the recore in this case and have determined that the previously withheld information will continue to be withheld from public disclosure. Therefore, your appeal is denied. The withheld portions of the records consist of names, addresses and other information the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarran+ed invasion of personal privacy. This information will contine to be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Exemption (6) of the FCIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6))

and 10 CFR 9.17(a)(6) of the Commission's regulations.

I ac unable to identify any legitimate public interest in the release of this inferr.ation which outweighs the privacy interests of the individuals.

This is a final agency decision on the eight records. As set forth in the F01A (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B)), judicial review of this decision is available in a district court of the United States in the district in urich you reside or have your principal place of business or in the District of Columbia.

Sincerely, 11th 1 Hu

. Thompson,

., De.< Executive Director Nuclear Mate ials Tety, 3afeguards and Operations Support

Enclosure:

Appendix F 8909200206 090918 N,bMA A-23 PDR

,Ai g-

~

Re: F01A-87-535 APPENDIX F RECOCS PARTIALLY WITHHELD NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AND EXEMPTION I 86-6 1.

Undated Domestic' Return Receipt. (1 page)

Ex. 6 I

2.

8/30/84 Letter to (deleted) from Ipp:llito.

(1 page) Ex. 6 3..

10/29/84 Telephone Conversation Record.

(1 page) Ex. 6 4

1/28/85 Letter to (deleted) from Noor.an.

l (1 page) Ex. S 5.

2/5/85 Domestic Return Receipt. (1 page)

Ex. 6 6.

5/7/85 Letter to (Deleted) from Noocan.

(1 page) Ex. 6.

7.

5/9/85 Letter to (Deleted) from Vincent S. Noonan.

(1 page)

Ex. 6 8.

5/14/85 Domestic Return Receipt. (1 page)

Ex. 6 I 85-11 9.

2/21/85 Memo for Chairman and Connissioners subject: Waterford 3 from Connelly,(1 page) Ex. 5 Allegations.

10.

2/28/85 Memo for Connelly from Chilk, subject: Review of Closed Cornission Meeting Transcript.

(1 page) Ex. 5 11.

3/7/85 Memo For The Record, from Chilk, subject: Staff Requirements - Discussion of Pending Investigation, 10:00 a.m.,

Tuesday, February 26, 1985, Commissioners' Conference Ro:n, D.C. Office (Closed--Ex. 5 atd 7) l 1

(Part I - 01 and ED0 Staff). (1 page)

)

Ex. 5 I

..