ML20247H911

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 89-08, Erosion/Corrosion- Induced Pipe Wall Thinning. Administrative Procedure, Defining Erosion/Corrosion Monitoring Activities,Issued on 890220 & NUMARC Recommendations Adopted
ML20247H911
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  
Issue date: 07/24/1989
From: Parker T
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-89-08, GL-89-8, NUDOCS 8907310175
Download: ML20247H911 (4)


Text

_ _ _ _

M i

Northem States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 554011927 Telephone (612) 330-5500 i

July 24, 1989 j

Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j

y_S Nuclear Regul.atory Commission Attn: : Document} Control l Desk' Wa'shington DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR-42 l

50-306 DPR-60 1

Response to Generic Letter 89-08 Erosion / Corrosion-Induced Pine Wall Thinninn Attached is our response to Generic Letter 89-08, " Erosion / Corrosion-Induced Pipe Wall Thinning," for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.

Please contact us if you have any questions related to our response, i

/

Thomas arker lianager Nuclear Support Services

{

cc: Regional Administrator, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC Resident Inspector, NRC G Charnoff Attachments: Affidavit Response to Generic Letter 89-08 i

l l

8907310175 990724 kl PDR ADOCK 0S000282 P

PNV

\\

'D

-I

+

.i

~.

i UNITED STATES NUCLEAR 'REGUIATORY COMMISSION 1

1 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY l

' PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NOS. 50-282 50-306 RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 89-08 1

Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, with this letter.is

']

submitting confirmation that a erosion / corrosion monitoring program exists as j

described in our re'sponse to Generic Letter'89-08 dated July 24,- 1989..

This letter and attachment contain no restricted or other.' defense information.

]

,q NORTHERN STATES POWER' COMPANY l

4 i.

I E7, Thomas M Parker Manager Nuclear Support Services.

i on this 07 day of I

'b before me a notary public in and forsaidCounty,personallyahpearedThomasMParker,ManagerNuclear. Support Services, and being first duly sworn acknowledged that he.is' authorized to execute this document on behalf of Northern States Power Company,.that he knows the contents thereof, and that to the best of his howledge, information, and belief the statements made in it are true and that it is not-l interposed for delay.

1

(,

\\as 6L CL !

, (~ iL((?ll

_i

.I a mWWWWVWWW Ns MARCIA'K taCORE E

NOTARY PUBLIC--WNNESOTA h

HENNEPIN COUNTY l

My Commission Expres Sept 24.1993($

www:::::::::::.wws+wwvwsvm I

i m

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT i

Attachment i

Response to Generic Letter 89-08 Erosion /Corrision-Induced Pine Wall Thinning REQUIRED ACTION Provide assurances that a program, consisting of systematic measures to ensure erosion / corrosion does not lead to degradation of single phase and two phase high-energy carbon steel systems has been implemented. Your response should j

include information on whether or not you have implemented or intend to I

implement a long term erosion / corrosion monitoring program that provides j

assurances that procedures or administrative controls are in place to assure j

that the NUMARC program or another equally effective program is implemented and the structural integrity of all high-energy (two phase as well as single phase) carbon steel systems is maintained.

RESPONSE

A program for monitoring wall thinning on single phase and two phase high

)

energy carbon steel piping is in place at the Prairie Island Nuclear Cenerating Plant. There are a number of activities associated with this monitoring program.

These activities are described below:

Administrative Controls

]

Corporate Administrative Control Directives, N1ACDs, define requirements for the Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program. Revision 2 of N1ACD 9.4 was issued July 15, 1988.

This revision describes requirements and responsibilities for Erosion / Corrosion Inspection.

On-site activities for the erosion / corrosion work ate performed in accordance with Section D73 of the Plant Operations Manual.

Erosion / Corrosion inspections were performed prior to the adoption of the formal administrative controls.

These inspections were governed by communications between the plant staff and the Materials and Special Processes (M&SP) section of the Production Plant Maintenance Department, and use of the Plant Operations l

Manual, D-Section.

An administrative procedure defining Erosion / Corrosion monitoring activities was issued February 20, 1989 by the Materials and Special Processes.

I i

e 4

I Attachment Page 2 of 2 Procedures i

Procedures are being developed to:

1 l

1.

Determine the scope of inspection.

2.

Select inspection location from the scope of 1 above.

I 3.

Perform inspections.

l 4.

Report inspection results.

J 5.

Analyze inspection results.

l 1

These procedures describe activities already being performed.

The procedures are scheduled to be issued by September 1, 1989.

EpMARC Procram The NUMARC program contains three recommendations:

1.

Analysis and baseline inspection.

2.

Determine extent of any thinning, repair and replace as needed.

3.

Perform repeat inspections and other corrective actions.

)

I Our program has and will continue to conform to the these recommendations.

Both the NUMARC recommendations and NUREG-1344 make reference to ths EPRI CHEC program without offering specific recommendations to use the CHEC computer program. NSPs experience with the CHEC program has not been favorable. NSP has discontinued use of CHEC.

,-j Encineerine Activitie:

I A number of engineering activities are underway to mitigate the effects of Erosion / Corrosion.

1 1.

When appropriate, materials less susceptible to Erosion / Corrosion are used in place of carbon steel.

Carbon steel extraction piping at Prairie Island is being replaced with stainless steel.

o 2.

Backing rings are deleted from joints which are replaced due to Erosion / Corrosion.

3.

Accuracy and repeatability of various UT techniques are being investigated.

4.

Methods of selecting susceptible locations are being investigated.

$