ML20247H554

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/89-14. Corrective Actions:Stop Order on Fuel Movement Issued & Action Plan Generated on 890908 to Address Broader Issues

ML20247H554
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	09/01/1989
From:	Keuter D SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:	Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
AGM-NUC-89-096, AGM-NUC-89-96, NUDOCS 8909200017
Download: ML20247H554 (8)

Text

y7m y --- -

J.  ;% ldf pi~ e- ,

,  :'(

45' )SMUD-SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTIUTY DISTRICT O 6201 S Street. P.O. Box 15830. Sacramento CA 95852-1830,(9103 452-3211

[rc AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART OF CAltFORNIA iy m

AGM/NUC 89-096 7, u)

(M September 1, 1989 'M

~_ rn

~A C$

< ?>2.

U. S. . Nuclear Regulatory Commission 'v-

.:- o n c o Attn: J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator -

Region V . -

1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 C#

. Walnut Creek, CA- 94596 DocketNo. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station License-No. DPR-54 DISTRICT COMMITMENTS IN RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION 89-14 -

EMERGENCY PLANNING

Dear Mr. Martin:

1 During the exit aeeting held on September 1, 1989, between representatives of your staff and the Rancho Seco staff, four

. potential violations were-identified relative to the Rancho Seco Emergency Plan. As was noted by Jim Shetler, our Deputy Assistant General Manager, Nuclear, District management is extremely concerned about the implications of the readiness of the~ Emergency Response Organization (ERO) based upon your inspection findings. I want to reiterate our commitment that protection of the public health and safety is the primary concern of'the Rancho Seco organization.

To demonstrate our commitment and to assure rapid response to the concerns raised in the subject inspection, the District commits to the following actions:

1.- For the ten essential positions that currently show no qualified persons in place, we will immediately identify at least one person who can be qualified by procedure or initiate necessary training to bring qualifications current.

The. District will notify the NRC Resident Inspector by 1300 hours0.015 days <br />0.361 hours <br />0.00215 weeks <br />4.9465e-4 months <br /> on Saturday, September 2, 1989, of our ability to complete this action or our schedule for completion. The intent is to assure qualified ERO positions are in place as soon as possible.

h O

RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION D 14440 Twin Cities Road, Herald, CA 95638-9799;(209) 3334935 b -_ __ _ _ ._- ~ !

.;% * ? y-m4 N ,. . +

J. B. Martin AGM/NUC 89-096 2.. Provide an-updated ERO callout list identifying by name who is qualified for each position. Those personnel who are assigned to a position, but are not yet qualified for that position, will be clearly identified. This will assure that the properly qualified personnel will be called out in response to an emergency situation. The updated callout list will be issued by September 2,-1989.

3. .The Manager, Nuclear Quality and Safety has issued a Stop Work Order on fuel movement to prevent any movement of fuel until we have verified that there is an adequately qualified ERO staff. (See attached)

4. In order to properly document the issues identified by the potential violations from your inspection, foer Potential Deviations from Quality (PDQs) have been issued. We will use these PDQs to ensure that the inspection issues are properly evaluated and dispositioned. (See attached)

5. The Manager, Nuclear Quality and Safety has initiated a surveillance on our controlled copies of the Emergency Plan m and implementing procedures to determine if there is a wider concern about proper maintenance and updating of emergency manuals. This surveillance will be completed by September 2, 1989. In addition, Quality has been requested to broaden this surveillance to address the issue of any generic concern on controlled manual updates.

6. An action plan will be generated by September 8, 1989 to address the broader issues from your inspection and the District's corrective actions to resolve them.

At this time I again want to reiterate the District's commitment to meeting the requirements of our license and assuring the health and safety of the public. We take the issues raised in this inspection seriously and intend to correct any deficiencies as rapidly as we can.

Sincerely, Ild x -

Dan R. Keuter Assistant General Manager Nuclear Attachments cc: M. Virgilio, NRC, Washington, DC A. D'Angelo, NRC, Rancho Seco Document Control Desk, Washington, DC L____--____

I

p ,

STOP WORK ORDER PAGE 1 OF2 SWO NO. 89-02 REV. 0

@ EFFECTIVE DATE/ RIME:9-1-89, 4:30.pn b ADDRESSEE: J. Shetler h DISCUSSED WITH.J. Shetler h SCOPEOFACTIVITYSTOPPED: Any movement of fuel naterials in the spent fuel g pool, removal of the Reactor Vessel Head, or any operational mode change.

REASON FOR STOPPAGE:

NRCInspectionoftheRanchoS&coEmergencyPlanning@

Program, during the week of 8-28-89, revealed deficiencies in the training and qualification records of plant personnel assigned to the Emergency Response Organization (ERO). The deficiencies indicate the ERO may not be staffed with personnel capable of irtplementing the plant's emergency plan.

Refere.nce PDQs89-641, 89-642,89-643, 89-644.

SCOPE OF LIMITED WORK AUTHORIZATION AND ANY CONDITIONS IMPOSED:

NONE.

CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED TO LIFT SWO: Demonstrate the the Emergency @

Response Organization is staffed with adequately trained / qualified personnel and that a plan is in place to assure proper staffing of the ERO will continue.

5 AGM NUCLEARQUALITY&IND. SAFETY h ACKNOWLEDOEMENTBYADDRESSEE @

ds

" ~

wr1 0fAbd 1Nn

/ DA

' TE DATE

[

ADM-064 Rev.3 (RSAP-0102)

[, . ..

k,1 .

STOP WORK ORDER '

PAOE 2 OF2 SWO NO. 89-02 REV. O RESPONSE: CAUSE: g

~

REMEDIAL CORRECUVE ACTION g COMPLETION COMMTTMENTDATE ACT5ON TO PREVENTRECURRENCE g~

AOM/DATE RESPONE EVALUATION: h CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED QUAUTY ENGINEER /DATE FOLLOW UP CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED E NO Lir nNO SWO RESPONSE ACCEETED AND LIFTED g

AGM, NUCLEAR QUAUTY & IND. SAFE 1Y/ DATE FOLLOW UP CORRECTION ACDON VERIFICATION: g FOLLOW UP CORRECDON ACTION VERIFIED AND EVALUATED AS EFFECTIVE:

OUAUTY ENG!bTER/DATE ADM464 Rev.3 (RSAP4102)

3 t : , .. '

',j, . POTENTIAL DEVIATION FROM QUAUTY FORM PAat i Or_

(INSTRUCVONS FOR INITIATING THl$ FORM ON REVERSE SOE) PDQ# M-W/

, 1. CAR OF OCCUIUEENCE: I/ TlWE OF OCCUfutENCE: EN gj REV# M '

2. DAM OF IDENTFICA10N:  !/U DME OF CENERCADON*

3. SS NOTIMED: %Y CN 4. EME OF NODRCA10N:

M S. SS NAWD I

8. SYSTEW:. Ub 7. EQUIPMENT ID: NM S. EQUIPMENT NAWO S. QUAUTY CLASS: -

1

10. PROBLEM DESCRIP10N: )

g IS Sa the ames of Drills ud Emercises. The semiannual D Drill has'not r been pertermed eines Octaher 3, 1988. The . Tune 1989 s-i-1 W

< Drill was esamstad. This is a violatica of TW 6.8.1 &a that Z pseendere WIP-5618 referenees the Drille and Buereise Esmeal ukink requires that a semiarmaal D Drill he seeducted.

I5 11. A5500ATED 07. WR OR QTHER DOCUMENTS:

12. AFFECTED ORAWINGS'

14. ORONATOR NAW* dA Mt#f e EXP.

13. P.O./ CON 1RACT:

8/~107 kAE.STP M 9 $

ORaNATOR SoNuuRe 406 4,' -

DEPT: L/2mI* DAu: ,

9 /~f7

15. EQUPMENT OPERATES IN PRESENT CONMOURA10N (FOR CONFl8URA10N DISOGEPANCES): QY UN SUPERVISOR NAMC I bdA/b EXT! 4N/T WAA.STOP: S SUPERMSOR SONATU L Ibh*8E DAM: M sn

~

u i/'

18. POTENTIALLY REPORTAB[COMON: OY EN PURSUANT TO: TS 4.E I

17. TECN SPEC MOLADON: lgT DN OPERA 8LE: O Y ON WNA

.lUSTIFY 1F NO LER REQUIRED:jj'askMrF.AM Il r$ mIA, ha h)bT If' f M #TA m 9 '

8 F

b

15. SS NAWO SS SONATURD DATO T1Mc Pu

19. PRIORITY: D0 CY ON m 20. DUE DATE/DEPARTWENT ASSGNED:

Z

/ / //

h -// TECHNICAL SERVICES TRAINING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Iy / /

/ /

/ /

00CUWENT CONTROL dAINTENJaCE SECURITY

/ /

/ /

/ /

WCDiMCATIONS WATERIAL WCWT UCENSNG

/ /

/ /

/ /

CHEMfSTRY OPERATIONS OTHER

/ / INFORMATION SYSTEWS / / RAD PROTECTION $

21. OPS DEPT WGR SGNATURL DATE ADM-129 REV 8 (RSAP-1308)

l PAGEiOr_  !

f POTENTIAL DEMATlON FROM QUAUTY FORM PDQ#F/-@ A f (INSTRUCT 0NS FOR INITIATING THIS FORW ON REV#,d REVERSE SOE)

,. oAM Or OCCo 0D %,/s b EOrOCCU,Re.m > &>

2. DAM OF IDENTIFICA10N:

4 // /M EME OF 10ENDFICATICN* N'

4. EME OF NOTIFICADON: iI S. SS NAME: I

3. $$ NOTIFIED: 9Y S. SYSTEM: 7. EQUtPMENT 10: M/

S. QUAUTY CLASS:

8. EQUIPMENT NAMD.

10. PROSLEW DESCRIl VON:

e Two controlled EnerTea0Y Plane aru". EF Ib In the area c't EF unintenance. in the Energency Preparedness offices W Z$ementing Procedures sets recent

<' were ^cheeked and teend to be out of data in that the most

u ann a met in the manuale.

l8

11. AS500ATED DCP, WR OR OD4ER DOCUMENTS:

13. P.O./ CON 1RACT:

A/A

12. AFFECTED ORAWINCS:

Aw/ [hdPh _ EXT: #E7 WESTOP 8 2$

14. CRIGNATOR NAMr.

- DEPT: I /* # DAlt:

!O ORIQNATOR SoliATURE: y

15. EQUIPMENT OPDMTES IN SENT CON QURA10N (FOR CONFIGURA10NNI OfSGIEPANG CN EXT: dO/7 MAR.STOP:

SUPERMSOR NAME:

MPvS LC DATE: _  !/ '

N U  !/

SUPERMSOR SONATUa // ~7 )

PURSUANT YO: T I b.I.l

18. POTENTIALLY REPORTA8LE CONDITION: 0Y EN OPERA 8LD OY ON ENA

17. TECH SPEC MOLATION: W ON Of AT aaa d Odna#IstJTtAEw* Tf utM JUSTIFY IF NO LER REQUIRED:

u) Sa e c <* c's e ATLA __ A ret Oat-ivao] n a M et z i 5

8 _

AM

18. SS NAME:

TIMD PM DATE:

SS S@lATURD DO OY ON

19. PRIORITY:

g y) 20. DUE DATE/DEPARTWENT ASS *NED:

/ / - TRAINING / / DMRONMENTAL PROTECTION

/ / TECHNICAL SERVICES

/ / / / CHEMISTRY y / / DOCUMENT CONTROL MODIFICATIONS IZ $ / /

/ /

/ /

MAINTENAPvCE SECURITY INFORMATION SYSEMS

__ _ / / WATERIAL MCWT

/ l_ UCENSNG

/ / RAD PROTECTION

/ /

/ /

OPERATIONS OTHER I

D ATD _.

21. OPS DEPT MGR SCNATURD ADM-129 REV 8 (RSAP-1308)

J/

, ace 1 0r_._

~ {

POTENTIAL DEVIATION FROM QUAUTY FORM PF-693 f PDQ#

(INSTRUCTIONS FOR INIDADNG THIS FORM ON PEviERSE S10E)

REV# 6 '

1. DATE OF OCCURRDCD  ! / N TlWE OF OCCURRatv- I00

/ f / Ml T;WE OF IDENDACADON _.7 0

2. DATE OF IDENTIACATON:

S. $$ NAME: ,

3. SS NOT1 RED: SY ON 4. T!WE OF NOTIACATION:

6. SYSTEM: 7. EQUIPWENT 10:

-- 9. QUAUTY CLASS:

6. EQUIPMENT NAME:

10. PROOLEM DESCRIPTION:

The Emo is comprised of 375 personnel 1% p Z

In the

,z_H, ^

area (including 44 of ERO 142 Training.and licensed (434) are not non-lioenned qualified in operators).

eocordance 14 of 80 ERO personnel were not qualified in accordance with IFIP-5600. This is a violation of TS 4.8.1 in that procedure EPIP-5400 Training was not edequately implemented.

with Cf these 375 EPIP-5400.

(3 18 11. ASSOCIATED DCP. WR OR OTHER DOCUWENTS:_

12. AFFECTED DRAWINGS *

54. ORiomTOR NAWe All-Aw/, . ext:

13. P.O./ CONTRACT:

4707 uAn.sTCe: # 9 1

• DEPT: D ATO -.

ORONATOR SGNATURD '

/ OY ON

15. EOLMPWENT OPERATES IN PRESENT CONAGURATION 44/3' uutsTOP: (FOR CO Exn SuPERwSOR NAue 1 L. /~~w/k SUPERMSOR SONA1URQ m M NM DATC

! /'

/

1. Y ()

PUR$UANT TO: TI le. I. /

16. POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE CONDITION: OY GN gi OPERABLC OY ON ENA

17. TECH SPEC VIOLAllON: IFf CN ,

• l JUSTIFY IF NO LER REQUIRED:

if.E &ar eout af AM a4 e L TfAa Asav #4lkWr '

M O

n Z

f' < ~

N a.

l l

O

16. SS NAMC Pu DATE: TlWE:

SS SGNATURO DO OY ON

19. PRIORITP.

20. DUE DATE/DEPARTWENT ASSGNED; vm 2 / / TRAINING

/ / ENV!RONWENTAL PROTECTON

/ / TECHNICAL SERVICES

/ / WOOIRCATIONS

/ / CHEutSTRY

/ / . DOCUMENT CONTROL

[ / / OPERATIONS

__/ / - WATERIAL WCWT k / / MAINTENANCE

/ / UCENSNG

/ / OTHER _

/ / SECURITY  ?

/ / / / RAD PROTECTION INFORMATION SYSTEMS D ATE: -

21. OPS DEPT WGR SCNATURO ADM-129 REV 8 (RSAP-1306)

~, .

POTENTIAL DEVIATION FROM QUAUTY FORM wx 1 Or_

(INSTRUCTIONS FOR INITIATING THIS FORM ON REVERSE SIDE) PDQ# U-6W

1. .c4Tt Or OCCuRRENcc 9/ I/IinuE Or OCCuRRENct: 2bo E N

2. DATE OF IOmTinCATON: /I /I VME OF IDENEMCATION- W

3. SS NOTIRED: $Y ON 4.11ME OF NOTIACATION: S. SS NAWQ 7. A

6. SYSTEu: A 7. EOUIPMENT ID: b

5. EQUIPMENT NA!JC S. QUAUTY CLASS.

10. PROCLEM DESCRIPTION:

IgO In the area of Emo Maintenance. Persannel were added to the ERO statfing roster who rare not qualified for the aosigned FR0 position.

Qualification is in accordance with EFIP-5600.

personnel were not qualified in tocordance with EFIP-5600. Ten of 16 of 80 ERO Q the 19 essential positions have no one qualified (in accordance with ggZ EFIP-5600). This includes eight persocnal in the TSC. This is a violation of TS 6.8.1 in that procedu.e EITP-5600 Training was t.ct adequately implemented.

Ig 11. ASSOCATED DCP. WR OR OTHER DOCUWENTS:

12. AFFECTED DRAWNCS-N

13. P.O./ CONTRACT:

14. ORIGINATOR NAWr. ase L Exn 4 7 o ? .A,t3TO , EL ORIGINATOR SGNATURD ,

DEPT:- [/ M/N,4)A1O .

f "5. COUIPMENT OPERATES IN pRESENTpAQURATION (FOR CONMOURATION DISCREPANCIES): OY SUPERMSOR NAWQ J , b L VWN L EXT: MY/3 MAE VgP: A9 [

SUPERVlSOR SGNATURQ N SCC OATO /

//' R V /(

18. POTENTIALLY REPORTA8LE CONDbik)N: O Y EH PURSUANT TO: Y 5 [a . I . I

17. TECH SPEC VIOLATION: %Y ON O O Y O N QNA OIm!ATkDell &gA84: Md mA * % T $ thA AJ O'r v apav A bt,

. JUSTIFY IF NO LEA REQUIRED: '

h m

Z b

D.

18. SS NAWQ g

DATO TIWe Pu SS SONATURD

19. PRIORITY: DO OY ON

k. m 20. DUE DATE/ DEPARTMENT ASSCHED:

2

/ / TECHNICAL SERVICES / / TRAINING // ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

//

y / / DOCUWENT CONTROL / / WODIRCATIONS CHEMtSTRY

/ / //

{ gs //

/ /

MAINTENANCE

/ /

MATERIAL WCWT

//

OPERATIONS

[

SECURITY uCENSNc OTNER

/ / INFORMATION SYSTEMS

/ / RAD PRO 1ECTION

21. OPS DEPT MGR SGNATURD DATL ADM-129 REV 8 (RSAP-1306)

_-__- -