ML20247G890
| ML20247G890 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 04/25/1989 |
| From: | Dillman D WASHINGTON STATE UNIV., PULLMAN, WA |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-MAG-079B, OL-I-MAG-79B, NUDOCS 8905310100 | |
| Download: ML20247G890 (66) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:n- '~ . ~ - - ~. _ _ _ _ _ _. [ [. m..j.* 9-- i (
- ged m
/ cct grig february 21, 1989 ?.- T9 MAY 23' P4 :21.. APPENDIX
- .y Testimony _of D'r.
Don Dillman regardi Ihh fNi 7 ) In the Matter of PUBLIC SERVICE CO. ~ NUCLEAR REGut.ATORY COMMISSION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE,~et al. puvyot-No g g ~^- Officia! ${Lbh- ,4 (Seabrook Station) Docket th. _AL h f Docket Nos. 50-443-OL b tt: nder cf / LT 50-444-OL l' rp;ni;rl:9 eNt _ (gist _ __ _ REC 3VE D._._ REjtciED.c2O /d 3 3 tr. mnx _.t., Yd &T}.__ _ DME 1 Reprie. -s n! '<y. en t l a I' { 8905310100 890425 l aDocx omg3h] l L
- De w.
m,a _.3
c o - 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS l h ~ A. Don A. Dillman: Biographical Sketch..................... 1 B. Memorandum to G. Gram, J. Crafts, V. Everett, and G. Wil_lant from Millie Munroe dated November 18, 1987'regarding Special Needs Survey...................... 21 C. Letter.to Special Needs Advocate from Millie Munroe, Special Population Coordinator to the Offsite Emergency Response Organization dated September 14, 1987 with accompanying poster..............'22 D '. -Memorandum on survey results labelled "Millie Munroe..... 24 E. Special Needs Survey Data................................ 27 F. Memorandum to M..Hawkins, J.
- Franks, J.
Hart and T. Cotter from George Willant and Sheila Hertel dated February 11, 1988 regarding Mass Special Needs Survey with handwritten note............... 35 G. Special Needs Survey Verification Form.................. 37' H. Emergency Preparedness Project Questionnaire............ 40 I. Seabrook EPZ Project for Mass. Residents l Availability of Evacuation Assistance Final Counts....... 42 J. Seabrook Emergency Preparedness Project Executive Summary dated November 12, 1987................ 43 K. Letter to International Survey Research, Attention John Haskin from Ray E. Weber, Impell Project Manager dated May 26, 1987....................... 55 L. Letter to Mass. Resident from Terry L. Harpster, Director of Emergency Preparedness, Public Service of New Hampshire......................................... 56 M. Excerpts from Applicants' Response to MAG's 2nd Sofk SPMheOInterrogatoriestotheApplicantson iested November 1, 1988.............................. 58 3 e I
Biographical Sketch 5* 00N A. DILLMAN Director, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC) . Professor, Departments of Sociology and Rural Sociology Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164-4014 (509) 335 1511 Don A. Dillman received his B.S. in Agronomy (1964), M.S. . (1966), and his Ph.D. in Sociology (1969), all from lowa State University, Ames Iowa. He then joined Washington State University as an Assistant Professor in September 1969. In 1970, Oillman became the founding director of the Washington State University Social Research Center's Public Opinion Laboratory, the first university-based telephone social research laboratory in the western United States, a position he held until 1973. He served as Chair of the Department of Rural Sociology from 1973 to 1981. During 1978, he was Acting Community Resource Development Program Leader for the Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, and in 1984-85 was Acting Chair of the Department of Child and Family Studies. From 1980-83, Dillman was a Fellow in the Kellogg Foundation's National Fellowship Program. He was elected 1983-84 President of the Rural Sociological Society, a national professional organization with members from throughout the United States and 40 other countries. Oillman received the Rural Sociological Societys 1983 Certificate for Outstanding Service for co-editing the book, Rural Society in the United States: Issues for the 1980's. Dillman is author of Mail and Telechone Surveys: American Housino Dream: The Total Desion Method and co-author of Beyond the Accommodation to the 1980's. In addition, he has authored more than 90 other publications. Dillman has an ective research program which blends efforts to improve survey research methouc with the study of issues affecting rural America. Current projects concern impacts of information technologies on people and institutions and the adoption of no-till agriculture by farmers. Other projects focus on the improvement of data collected by sail, telephone, and face-to-face interviews. He has served as an investigator on more than 20 grants and contracts worth S3.5 million. In 1985, and ain in 1987, Dillman was Guest Professor at the German Center for Survey Me 'and Analysis in Manheim, West Germany, and has also lectured in
- England,
, and The Netherlands. He presented the 1985 Distinguished Faculty at Washington State University. In 1987 he was elected a Fellow of the Ane Association for the Advancement of Science. A member of the USDA Rural Development Advisory Council, Oillman belongs to six professional associations, including the American Sociological Association, the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the American Association of Housing Educators, and the World Future Society. Oillman was appointed Director of the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center in February 1986. His administrative responsibilities include Washington { State University's survey research facility which conducts approximately 20 surveys each year. l [ June 1988) ATTACHMENT A -/-
e', .] L ,7 MS January :1989-VITA l q Don A.-Oillman 1 A. ADDRESSES-j ~0ffice: Egg: R Social and Economic Sciences SW 705 Mies Street Research Center Pullman, Washington .133-_ Wilson Hall -Telephone: (509) 334-1141 Wash _ington State University Pullman, Washington 99164-4014 L -Telephone::(509) 33S-1511 PERSONAL-DATA-B . Bi rth :.. October 24, 1941 Marital.Sta'tus: Married November 25, 1964 to Joye Jolly Son: Andrew Scott, born July 8, 1968 4 i -Daughter: Melody Lynne, born July 25, 1970 Soc. Sec. No.: 485-50-1354-1 C. EDUCATION B.S.: .1964, Iowa State University M.S.: 1966, Iowc State University Ph D.: 1969, Iowa State University Major: _ Sociology Minor: Political Science D. : PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 1986-Present' Director, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center; Professor, Departments of Sociology and Rural Sociology, Washington State University i 4 A 1984-19g Acting Chair, Department of Child and Family Studies, Washington State University 1978-1986 Professor, Department of Sociology; Research and Extension Sociologist, Department of Rural Sociology, Washington State University 1978 Acting Community Resource Development Program Leader, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University 1 i i
- 2 _____.____ -
e l-f PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS: (continued): 1973-1981 Chair,. Department of Rural Sociology, Washington State-University 1973-1978 _ Associate Professor, Department of Sociology; Associate Rural Sociologist, Department of Rural Sociology, Washington State University 1970-Present Graduate Faculty, Washington State University 1970-1973 Coordinator, Social Research Center's Public Opinion Laboratory, Washington State University 1969-1973 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology; Assistant Rural Sociologist, Department of Rural Sociology, Washington State University 1967-1969 Research Associate, Iowa State University; Associate Director for evaluat's, study of the Iowa Comprehensive Alcoholism Project 1964-1967 Research Assistant, Iowa State University 1961-1962 Trainee, Cooperative Extension Service, Mt. Pleasant and Atlantic, Iowa E.. AWARDS. HONORS. AND SPECIAL APPOINTMENTS 1980-1983 Fellow, Kellogg National Fellowship Program 1983 Co-Winner, Certificate for Outstanding Service to the Rural Sociological Society (of America) 1983-1984 President, Rural Sociological Society (of America) 1985 Washington State University Distinguished Faculty Address 1985, 1987 Guest Professor, ZUMA /Zentrum Fur Umfragen Methoden Und Analysen (Center for Survey Methods and Analysis), Mannheim, West Germany ) +; i 1987 Elected Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of l 3 Science }- 1987-1989 USDA National Rural Development Advisory Council { 1988 Instructor, 41st Summer Institute, Survey Research Techniques, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor l 1 2 l l .s -
m j[,J hy " F.= RESEARCH AND POLICY INTERESTS
- ALthree-pronged research program is maintained which focuses on'l) the improvement of survey research methods; 2) the. diffusion of new technologies; and.3) the impacts of information technologies on rural people and. organizations.
These research thrusts are frequently linked Land each-is complimented by policy interests in the application of research results. ' Publication efforts are. oriented towards appropriate policy as.well as research audiences, and are' frequently multidisciplinary .in nature. x; - G. PUBLICATIONS Books: 1. Dillman, Don A.. 1978. Mail and Teleohone Surveys: The Total Desian Method..New York: Wiley-Interscience. 375 pp. 2. Dillman, Don A. and Daryl J. Hobbs, eds. 1982. Rural Society fn 1hg h U.S.: Issues for the 1980s. Boulder, C0: Westview Press. vu pp. Hard and soft cover editions published simultaneously.) 3. Tremblay, Kenneth R., Jr. and Don A, Dillman. 1983. Beyond the .American Housina Dream: Accommodation to the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: University Press of. America. 157 pp. (Hard and soft cover editions published simultaneously.) Other Publications: 1. Beal, George M., Gerald E. Klonglan, Paul Yarbrough, Joe M. Bohlen, and Don A.'Dillman. 1967. System Linkaaes Amona Women's Organizations. Iowa State University, Ames, IA: Rural Sociology Report No. 42. 155 pp. 2. Klonglan,LGerald E., Don A. Dillman, Joel S. Wright, and George M. Beal. 1969. Aaency Interaction Patterns and Community Alcoholism Services. Iowa State University, Ames, IA: Sociology Report No. 73. 302 pp. 3. Kle W an, Gerald E., Joel S. Wright, and Don A. Dillman. 1969. " lisa Services: Client Characteristics and Treatment-Cutecme. 3 : State University, Ames, IA: Sociology Report No. 74. 271 pp. 4. Klonglan, Gerald E., Marjory M. Mortvedt, Don A. Dillman, and Joe M. Bohlen. 1969. Poverty and Alcoholism in Families. Iowa State University, Ames, IA: Sociology Report No. 72. 461 pp. 5.- Klonglan, Gerald E. and Don A. Dillman. 1969. Iowa comprehensive Alcoholism Pro.iect Research Summaries. Iowa State University, Ames, IA: Sociology Report No. 76. 104 pp. 3 - -- Y ~-- ~
o 6 0ther Publications: (continued) 6. Dillman, Don A. 1971. " Review of Woodruff: A Study in Community Decision-Making." Rural Socioloav 36(2):237-238. 7. Dillman, Don A. 1971. Public Values and Concerns of Washinotom Resi~ dents. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 748 (December). 8. Dillman, Don A. 1972. " Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response for Large Samples of the General Public." Public 00 inion Quarterly 35(3):254-257. 9. Dillman, Don A. and James A. Christenson. 1972. "The Public Value for Pollution Control." Pp. 237-256-in William R. Burch, Jr., et al.,-Social Behavior. Natural Resources and the Environment. New York: Harper and Row. 10. Dillman, Don A. and Russell P. Dobash. 1972. Preferences for ~ Community Livino and Their Implications for Pooulation Redistribution. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 764 (November). 11. Dillman, Don A. 1973. Pooulation Distribution Policy and Peoole's Attitudes: Current Knowledae and Needed Research. Prepared for Urban Land and Institute under grant from United States Department-of Housing and Urban Development. 77 pp. 12. Klonglan, Gerald E., Benjamin Yep, Charles L. Mulford, and Don A. Dillman. 1973. "A Survey of the Theory and Practice of Interorganizational Relations." Pp. 331-362 in Voluntary Action Research, edited by David Horton Smith. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company (Lexington Books). 13. Dillman, Don A. and James A. Christenson. 1974. "Towards the Assessment of Public Values." Public Ooinion Ouarteriv 38(2):206-221. 14. Dillman, Don A. and James H. Frey. 1974. "The Contribution of Personalization to Mail Questionnaire Response as an Element of a Previously. Tested Method." Journal of Apolied Psycholoav 543):297-301. 15. Di1 men, Don A., James A. Christenson, E. H. Carpenter, and Ralph Bvweks. 1974. " Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four-State Comparison." American Sociological Review 39:744-756. 16. Christenson, James A. and Don A. Dillman. 1974. " Predictors of Conc _ern for Law and Order: A Path Analysis." Social Indicators Research 1:217-288. 4 -g.
4. Other Publications: (continued) 17. Dillman, Don A. 1975. "Research Implications of Western Migration." Western Wire 1(2):2. 18. Dillman, Don A. and James A. Christenson..1975. "The Public Value for Air Pollution Control." Cornell Journal of Social Relations 10:73-95. 19. Wardwell, John M. and Don A. Dillman. 1975. Alternatives for Washinoton. Volume VI. Public Communication and Survey Phase Results. 285 pp. Dillm'an, Don A., Jean Gorton Gallegos, and James H. Frey. 20. 1976. " Decreasing Refusal Rates for Telephone Interviews." Public Ooinion Ouarterly 50(1):66-78. 21. Carlson, John E., Maurice E. McLeod, and Don A. Dillman. 1976. Farmers' Attitudes Toward Soil Erosion and Related Farm Problems in the Palouse Area of Northern Idaho and Eastern Washinoton. Progress Report No. 196 (September). 10 pp. 22. Dunlap, Riley E. and Don A. Dillman. 1976. " Decline in Public Support for Environmental Protection: Evidence from a 1970-1974 Panel Study." Rural Sociolooy 41(3):383-390. Reprinted in Armand L. Mauss and Julie Camile Wolfe, This Land of Promises: The Rise and Fall of Social Problems in America. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1977. 23. Dillman, Don A. and Kenneth R. 1 emblay, Jr. 1977. "The Quality of Life in Rural America." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 429:115-129. 24. Dillman, Don A. 1977. "Our New Tools Need Not Be Used in the Same Old Way." Journal of Community Development Society 8(1):32-43. (An expanded version is published in National Conference on Non-Metropolitan Community Services Research. Committee Print of Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, United States Senate, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 259-275.) 25. Dillman, Joye J., Kenneth R. Tremblay, Jr., and Don A. Dillman. 1977. " Energy Policies Directed at the Home: Which Ones Will People Accept?" Housino Educators' Journal 4:2-13. 26. Tremblay, Kenneth R., Jr., and Don A. Dillman. 1977. "Research Ethics: Emerging Concerns from the Increased Use of Mail and Telephone Survey Methods." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 5(1):64-89. 5 .c.
w 9-.- Other Publications: (continued) 27. Tremblay, Kenneth R. Jr., Don A. Dillman, and Joye J. Dillman. 1977. Housino Satisfactions and Preferences of Washincton Residents: A 1977 Statewide Survey. College of Agriculture Research Center, Circular No. 605. 16 pp. 28. Tremblay, Kenneth R. Jr., Joye J. Dillman, and Don A. Dillman. I 1978. Toward a Socioloav of Housina: A Workina Biblioaraohv. Monticello, IL: Council of Planning Librarians, Exchange Bibliography 1485. 29. Dillman, Don A., John E. Carlson, and William R. Lassey. 1978. The influence of Absentee Landowners on use of Erosion Control Practices by Palouse Farmers. College of Agriculture Research Center, Circular No. 607. 13 pp. 30. Dillman, Don'A. 1978. "A Chairperson's Response to Ad Hoc Committee on Unemployed Rural Sociology Doctorates." Newsline (publication of Rural Sociological Society) 6:9-11. 31. Dillman, Don A. 1979. "Down a One-Way Road: The Disappearance of Rural Values in America." Pp. 1-8 in The American Heritaae and the Rural Community, edited.by Donald H. Bishop. Washington State University Publications. 32. Dunlap, Riley E., Kent D. Van Liere, and Don A. Dillman. 1979. " Decline in Public Concern with Environmental Quality: A Defense of the Evidence." Rural Socioloav 44:204-212. 33. Fernandez, Richard and Don A. Dillman. 1979. "The Influence of Community Attachment on Geographic Mobility." Rural Socioloav 44:345-360. 34. Dillman, Don A., Kenneth, R. Tremblay, Jr., and Joye J. Dillman. 1979. " Influence of Housing Norms and Personal Characteristics on Stated Housing Preferences." Housina and Society 6(1):2-19. 35. Dillman, Don A. 1979. " Residential Preferences, Quality of Life, and the Population Turnaround." American Journal of Agricultural Ecapanics 61(5):960-966.
- 36..Tr
, Kenneth R. Jr., Don A. Dillman, and Kent Van Liere. 1980. tionship Between Community Size Preferences and Housing Preferences." Rural Socioloav 44:509-519. 37. Marans, Robert and Don A. Dillman. 1980. The Ouality of Life in Rural America: An Analysis of Survey Data from Four Studies. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: Research Report Series. 110 pp. 6 2
Other Publications: (continued) ~ 38. Dillman, Don A. 1980. " Citizens' Preferences and Concern About Growth and Its Management." Pp. 34-40 in Raoid Community Growth: Is It Manaceable?, edited by Ronald C. Faas. Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 39. Howell, Robert E. and Don A. Dillman. 1980. "Needs Assessment Surveys: Potentials, Pragmatics, and Pitfalls." In Dorothy Z. Price and Joye J. Dillman, Proceedings of the 19th Annugl Kittern Recional Home Manacement Family Economics Educators' Conference, Department of Child and Family Studies, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
- 40. Dillman, Don A.
1980. "After Mount St. Helens: Seven Gray Days in May." Lewiston Mornino Tribune, May 17, Section 0:3-4. (Complete version available as Department of Rural Sociology mimeo, Washingtor. State University. 37pp.) 41. Tremblay, Kenneth R. Jr., Charles L. Schwartz, and Don A. Dillman. 1981. " Understanding the Boom Town Problem: Value Conflict Between Oldtimers and Newcomers." thiman Services in the Rural Environment 6(1):11-15. 42. Dillman, Don A. 1981. " Rural Sociological Research: The Next Ten Years." The Rural Sociologist 1(4):209-220.
- 43. Dillman, Don A.
1981. " Whores, Sex Education, Clawing Sycophantism, and Rural Sociology: A Reply to Nyberg." The Rural Sociologist 1(6):400-402. 44. Dillman, Don A., Patricia A. Tripple, Carole J. Makela, Joye J. Dillman, and LaRae B. Chatelain. 1981. "A Western States Perspective on Public Policy for Energy Conservation." Housino and Society 8(2):80-92. 45. Tremblay, Kenneth R. Jr., Don A. Dillman, and Joye J. Dillman. 1981. " Acceptable Housing Alternatives." $p Challence 12(5):25-27.
- 46. Carlson, John E., Don A. Dillman, and William R. Lassey.
1981. The Farmar and Erosion: Factors influencing the Use of Control P s:tices. University of Idaho College of Agriculture Bulletin No. 60F,: April. 11 pp.
- 47. Dillman, Don A., Mark Frederickson, B. Ray Horn, Nicholas Lovrich, Geraldine Plater, and Bruce Throckmorton.
1981. Priorities for Rural Improvement. Report of the Needs Assessment Study Group, Partnership for Rural Improvement, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 23 pp. 7 J q i -Y
p Other Publications:'(continued) ~ 48. Hobbs, Daryl J. and Don A. Dillman. 1982. "Research for Rural America." Pp. 1-9 in Rural Socioloov'in the U.S.: Issues for.1ha 19803, edited by Don A. Dillman and Daryl J. Hobbs. Boulder, C0: Westview Press. 49. Dillman, Don A. and Daryl J. Hobbs. 1982. " Issues for the 1980s." Pp. 414-420 in Rural Society in the U.S.- Issues for the 1980s, edited by Don A. Dillman and Daryl J. Hobbs. Boulder, 00: Westview Press. 50. Dillman, Don A., Joye J. Dillman, and Michael L. Schwalbe. 1982. " Strength of Housing Norms and Willingness to Accept Housing Alternatives." Housino and Society (Special Issue: Proceedings of the 1980 Annual Conference):123-132. 51. Dillman, Don A. and John E. Carlson. 1982. " Influence of Absentee Landlords on Erosion Control Practices." Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37(1):37-41. 52. Dillman, Don A., Kenneth R. Tremblay, Jr., and Joye J. Dillman. 1982. " Mobile Homes: Should Small Town Policies Change?" Small Towns 12(4):18-22.
- 53. 01denstadt, Dennis L., Robert E. Allan, George W. Bruehl, Don A.
Dillman, Edgar L. Michalson, Robert L. Papendick, and Donald J. Rydrych. 1982. " Solutions to Environmental and Economic Problems (STEEP): A New Model for Applied Research." Science, 217(3):904-909.
- 54. Makela, Carole J., LaRae B. Chatelain, Don A. Dillman, Joye J.
Dillman, and Patricia A. Tripple. 1982. Enerov Directions for the United States: A Western Perspective. Western Rural Development Center, Publication No. 13. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 55. Carlson, John E. and Don A. Dillman. 1983. " Influence of Kinship Arrangements on Farmer Innovativeness." Rural Socioloov 48(2):183-200. 56. Tremblay, Kenneth R. Jr., Florence S. Walker, and Don A. Dillman.
- 19. Chapter 2, "The Quality of Life Experienced by Rural Fellies." Pp. 26-40 in Family Servigs:
Issues and Oooortunities in P= t - erary Rural America, edited by Raymond T. Coward and Wil"1am M. Smith. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 57. Dillman, Don A. 1983. " Rural North America in the Information Society." The Rural Sociologist 3(5):345-357. l \\ e l 1 1 \\ q. i
k Other Publications: (continued) 58. Dillman, Don A. 1983. " Mail and Self-Administered Surveys." Chapter 10, pp. 359-377, in Handbook of Survey Research, edited by 1 Peter H. Rossi, James D. Wright and Andy B. Anderson. New York: Academic Press. 1 l
- 59. -Dillman Don A., Michael L. Schwalbe, and James F. Short, Jr.
1983. { " Communication Behavior and Social Impacts Following the May 18, i 1980, Eruption of Mount St. Helens." Pp. 191-198 in Mount St. 1 Helens. One Year later, edited by S. A. C. Keller. Cheney, WA: Eastern Washington University Press. 60. 9illman, Don A., Eugene A. Rosa, and Joye J. Dillman, 1983. " Life-I style and Home Energy Conservation in the United States: The Poor Accept Lifestyle Cutbacks While the Rich Invest in Conservation." Journal of Economic Psycholoav 3:299-315. 61. Dillman, Don A. 1983. "How A National Rural Policy Can Help Resolve Rural Problems." The Rural Sociologist 3(6):379-383. 62. Dillman, Don A., Joye J. Dillman, and Carole J. Makela. 1984. Pp. 49-64. "The Importance of Adhering to Details of the Total Design Method (TDM) for Mail Surveys." In Source Book 22, New Directions for Proaram Evaluation, edited by Daniel C. Lockhart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 63. Rosa, Eugene, A., Marvin Olsen, and Don A. Dillman. 1984. " Nuclear Power and the Public." Pp. 69-93 in Public Reactions to Nuclear Power: Are There Critical Masses?, edited by William R. Freudenburg and Eugene A. Rosa. Boulder, 00: Westview Press. 64. Dillman, Don A. 1985. "The Social Impacts of Information Technologies in Rural North America." Rural Socioloav 50(1):1-26. 65. Olsen, Marvin E., Eugene A. Rosa, Riley E. Dunlap, Robert E. Howell, and Don A. Dillman. 1985. "Public Opinion Versus Government Policy on National Energy' Issues." Pp. 189-210 in Research in Political Socioloav. Volume 1, edited by Richard G. Braungart. 7 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 66. Jones, Joann C., Don A. Dillman, LaRae B. Chatelain, Don A. Anderson, O m Iams, and Mary Ann Anderson. 1985. " Energy Directione Two Vers later: A Visual Presentation." A slide tape report of research results from Regional Research Project W-159, University of Idaho, School of Home Economics, Moscow, D. 67. Dillman, Don A. 1985. " Factors Influencing the Adoption of No-Till l Agriculture." Pp. 96-107 in Dave Higgins, Proceedings, 1985 No-Till Farming Crop Production Seminar. Yielder Drill Company, Spokane, Washington. (Also in 8th Annual Proceedings of Zero-Tillage Workshop, Manitoba-North Dakota Zero-Tillage Farmers i l Association, pp. 7-30,1986). l 9 l l to - C-_ __ _ _ _ - _ _ - - -
.g s L CW Other Publications: (continued). Carlson,I ohn E., Don A. Dillman,~ Donald-M. Beck,~and C. Ellen C 68.' J . Law' =n. 1985.' Early Adooters and Non Users of No-lill in the F M / Northwest. Final Report to USDA-SCS, Cooperative Agreement 50 nbl-177 Department of Agricultural Economics. University of Idaho,: Moscow,-10. '69. Dillman, Don A. 1985. "You Have Been Randomly-Selected... Survey Methods for the Information Age." 52nd Distin Address, Washington State University, Pullman,guished Faculty-' WA.-. Department of Rural Sociology mimeo and slide set; also on. video tape from KWSU-TV,; Pullman,. WA. 70. Dillman, Don A. 1986. " Social Issues Impacting Agriculture and Rural Areas as We Approach the 21st Century." Pp. 19-31.in.N_gg Dimensions in Rural Policvi 'Buildino Uoon Our Heritaae, edited by Ronald C.-Wimberly, Dale Jahr, and Jerry Johnson. U.S. Government P Printing Office, Washington, D.C. An earlier version is published -in' Issuer Facina Agriculture and Implications for Land Grant Colleaes of Agriculture, edited by Larry Whiting. Farm Foundation. Oakbrook, Illinois. 71. Hirschb'urg, Peter L., Don A. Dillman, and Sandra Ball-Rokeach. 1986. " Media System Dependency Theory: Responses to the Eruption of Mount,St_. Helens." Pp. 117-126 in Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach and-Muriel G. Cantor, Media. Audience. and Social Structure. Beverly Hills,-CA: Sage Publications. 72.: Carlson, ' John E. and Don A. Dillman'. 1986. "Early Adopters and Non' users of No-Till in the Pacific Northwest: A Comparison." In Conservina Soil, edited by Stephen B. and Ted L. Napier. Soil Conservation Society. of America, Ankeny, Iowa. 73. Dillman, Don A..1986. " Cooperative Extension in the Twenty-First-Century." The Rural Sociologist 6(2):102-119. Condensed version ' reprinted in Internaks Interchange, University of Illinois, Champagne-Urbana. 74. Dillman, Don A. and Donald M. Beck. 1986. "The Past is not the Future:. Urban Quality of Life as We Approach the 21st Century." W Resources 3(3):43-47. u Di %, formation Technology: 75. Don A. cnd Jurg Gerber. 1986. " Sociological Implications of In A Bibliography of Recent Publications." Council of P1anning Librarians, Chicago, IL. 32 pp. 76. Dillman, Joye J. and Don A. Dillman. 1987. " Private Outside Space as a Factor in Housing Acceptability." Housina and Society 14(1):20-29. 10 l I -II-
w. iw. Other Publications: (continued) 77. Dillman, Don A., Donald M. Beck, and Jonn E. Carlson. 1987. " Factors Influencing the Diffusion of No-Till Agriculture in the l i Pacific Northwest." Pp. 343-364 in Lloyd Elliot, STEEP - Soil _ Conservation Concepts and Accomplishments. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press. 78.Carlson, John E., Don A. Dillman, and Dale Boresma. 1987. " Ten Year Change in Attitudes Toward Soil Erosion." Pp. 333-341 in Lloyd Elliot, STEEP - Soil Conservation Conceots and Accomplishments. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press. 79. Dillman, Don A., Lesli Peterson Scott, and John Allen. 1987. Telecommunications in Washinoton: A Statewide Survey. Technical Report, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center. Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 43 pp. 80. Dillman, Don A. 1987. " Farm Research Needs Public Investment." (Editorial in) The Seattle Times. January 31, p. A-13. 81. Carlson, John E., Don A. Dillman, and C. Ellen Lamiman. 1987. The Present and Future Use of No-Till. Research Bulletin No. 140. University of Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station. 15 pp. 82. Dillman, Don A. 1987. Chapter 11: " Elements of Success." Pp. 188-209 in Donald Johnson, et al., Needs Assessment: Theory and Methods. Ames, Iowa: lowa State University Press. 83. Anderson, MaryAnn, Donna lams, Joann C. Jones, LaRae B. Chatelain, Don A. Dillman, and Donald A. Anderson. 1987. Enerav Directions for the United States: A Western Perspective. 1991-1983. Western Regional Research Publications No. 014. University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. Laramie, Wyoming. 71 pp. 84. Dillman, Don A., Joye J. Dillman, Kenneth R. Tremblay, Jr., and Michael A. Schwalbe. In press. " Housing Norms, Personal Characteristics and Stated Housing Preferences." In Social Asoects of Housina: Research Issues and Oooortunities, edited by Kenneth R. Tremblay, Jr. and Suzanne Lindamood. Hayworth Press. (Camposite ar:d updated version of two previously published a icles: Housino and Society 6(1):2-29, and 6(4):123-132.) 85. Dillman, Don A. 1988. "The Social Environment of Agriculture and Rural Areas." In Agriculture and Rural Areas Acoroachina the 21st Century: Challenaes for Agricultural Economists, edited by James Hildreth, et al. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, pp. 61-81. 11 - a. -
w f + Other Publications: (continued)
- 86. Dillman, Don A. and Donald M. Beck.
1988. Information Technologies .and Rural Development in the 1990s. Journal of State Government. 61(1) January / February: 29-38. (Earlier version in The Rural Great P1ains~of the Future. Great P1ains Agricultural Council Publication 125, pp. 185-210. Lincoln, Nebraska). '87.-Dillmail, Don A. and John Tarnai. 1988. " Administrative I! sues in Mixed Mode Surveys." In Robert Groves, et al.. Telephone Survev Methodoloav. New York: John Wiley Co., pp. 509-528. 88. Dillman, Don A., Carl R. Engle, James S. Long, and C. Ellen Lamiman. In press. "Others' Influencing Others." Journal of Extension. 89. Carlson, John E. and Don A. Dillman. 1988.. "The ~ Influence of Farmers' Mechanical Skill on. the Development and Adoption of 'a New Agricultural Practice." Rural Socioloav 53(2):235-245, 90. Dilln.an, Don A. Forthcoming. Information Technology in Agriculture: the United States Experience in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technoloav in Agriculture Food and Rural Development. Commission of the European Communities. Brussells, ' Belgium. 91. Dillman, Don A.,-Angela Mertig, and Todd Rockwood. 1988. Results of the Sorina 1988 Washinaton State Poll. Technical Report 88-10, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Pullman, Washington. 92. Dillman, Don A., Donald M. Beck, and John Allen. In press. " Rural Barriers to Job Creation Remain Even in Information Age." Rural Development Perspectives. (Earlier version published in Proceedings of the 1988 Washinaton Utilities and Transportation Commission Roundtable on Telecommunications Reaulatory Policy, Olympia, Washington, 1988). H. GRANTS AND CONTRACTS 1972 The' State Committee for a New Tax Policy; $3,000. Statewide Survey: Attitudes Toward a Proposed State Income Tax. 1974 Washington State Office of Planning and Fiscal Management; $48,000 (with John M. Wardwell). Alternatives for y Washington: Goals for the State of Washington. o y 1976-1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation; $947,000 (with others). Collaboration and Integration in Rural Planning and Development; the Partnership for Rural Improvement. Chairperson of Site Visit and (later) Advisory Committee for i i securing and implementing grant. Washington State University Representative to Inter-Institutional Regional Coordinating Committee which administered the grant. Chairperson, 1979-1980. 12
., ( GRANTS AND CONTRACTS: (continued) 1976-Present~ United States Department of Agriculture; $190,100. Solutions to Environmental and Economic Problems (STEEP); Factors influencing acceptance of soil erosion control practices in the Pacific Northwest, (Annual awards for 13 years.) 1979-1980 Western Rural Development Center; $44,500 (with' Robert Mason, Oregon State University). "The Use of Face-to-Face, Telephone, and Mail Surveys in Needs Assessment Efforts." 1980 Washington State University Graduate School, Office of International Development; $2,000. Travel to Fifth World Congress o.f Rural Sociology under Title XII AID Institutional Strengthening Grant. 1980-1981 United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative Agreement; $5,000 (with Daryl J. Hobbs, University of Missouri). Preparation of monograph, Rural Society in the U.S.: Issues for the 1980s. 1980-1982 National Science Foundation; $14,416 (with James F. Short, Jr.). Social Impacts of Mount St. Helens' Eruption. 1980-1983 .W. K. Kellogg Foundation; $30,000. Kellogg National Fellowship Program. 1980-1983 W. K. Kellogg Foundation; f 79,000 ~(with o'thus).
- Renewal, Partnership for Rural Improvement; Chairperson of Regional Coordinating Committee which administered grant, 1980-1981.
1981-1982 Washington State University Graduate School, Office International Development; $10,000 (with Don Messerschmidt, Linda Stone, and Take Tsuratani).. Development of interdisciplinary course on Human Issues in International Development. q 1983-1985 United States Soil Conservation Service; $60,000 (with John E. Carlson, University of Idaho). Innovation of No-Till Agr.iculture in ths Pacific Northwest. 1985 Farm Foundation; $4,000 (to assemble and chair Task Force). Travel for preparation of white paper on Impact of Current Agricultural Crisis on Future of the American Family Farm. l l 1986 Washington State Local Government Study Comission; $15,000. Statewide Survey of Citizen Opinions on Local Government. 1986 Washington State Legislature Joint Select Comittee on Telecommunications; $29,792. Statewide survey of telecomuni".ation needs of Washington residents. 13 -n-
GRANTS AND CONTRACTS: (continued) ^ 1987 Washington Institute for Public Policy Research; $2,250. Seminar on survey methods for committee staffs of Washington State Legislature. 1987 Washington State Department of Agriculture, Employment Security and Washington State University Cooperative Extension; $7,000. Farm Crisis survey of Washington wheat growers. 1987 Yakima Valley College. Agricultural Employee Education Needs Assessment; $8,180. Yakima County assessment _of farmers and agricultural businesses. 1987 Impact Assessment, Inc.; $54,882 (with Riley Dunlap). Socioeconomic Impacts of a Potential High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at the Hanford Site, Washington. 1987 Washington Institute for Public Policy, Phases I and II; $91,000 (with John Tarnai, Irving Tallman, and Ernst Stromsdorfer). Washington Longitudinal Study on Welfare Dependency. 1987-89 Washington State University Graduate School; $5,000 (with John Pierce, Scott Long, Duane Leigh, and Alex Tan). Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Establishment of State-of-the-State Survey. 1988 Washington State Traffic Safety Commission; $22,413 (with John Tarnai). Seatbelt Use Surveys. 1988 Washington Department of Social and Health Services; $15,000 (with John Tarnai). State-wide survey of licensed daycare providers, l 1988-1989 Washington Institute for Public Policy; $1,000,209 (with John Tarnai and Ernst Stromsdorfer). Washington State Family Independence Study. 1988-1989 United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative Agreement; $12,500. Research Opportunities for Faculty of 1890 Land-Grant Colleges and Universities. p 1988-1995E Northwest Area Foundation; $159,312 (with Douglas Young, David Bezdicek, John Carlson, Baird Miller, and David Mulla). Barriers to Low-Input Agricu.'ture: Implications for Policy, Extension, and Research. I 14 i -ir -
I. INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE 1963 International Farm Youth Exchange Delegate to Poland (six months). 1978 AID team to Eastern Islands of Indonesia to write long-term agreement between Washington State University and Association of Eight Eastern Islands Universities.(one month). 1978-Fifth World Congress for Rural Sociology, Mexico City, Mexico. 1983 Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. 1983 Kellogg Foundation Study Seminar, Colombia, Sout!1 America (two weeks). 1985, 1987 Guest Professor, German Center for Survey Research and Analysis, Mannheim, West Germany (summer). 1987 International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology, Charlotte, North Carolina. 1988 Information Technology in Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Conference, Dublin, Ireland. J. CONSULTING ASSIGNMENTS 1972 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Planning and the Urban Land Institute. Washington, D.C. 1974-1975 Office of Program Planning and Fiscal Management.
- Olympia, WA.
1975 Washington State Office of the Governor. Olympia, WA. 1975-1976 Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Portland, OR. 1976-1977 Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 1977 Farm Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C. 1978-1979. U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. 1979 Department of Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. -1979 Savings Institution Marketing Society of America, Chicago, IL. 1979-1981 A.C. Nielson Company, Northbrook, IL. 1979-1983 Western Region USDA Cooperative State Research Service Regional Project, W-159 1982 The Burke Company, Cincinnati, OH. 15 l - Ic -
'l J CONSULTING ASSIGNMENTS: (continued) ~ 1982 U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR. 1983-1984 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 1984 AT&T Communications, Basking Ridge, NJ. 1984 Institute for Policy Research, University of Wyoming. I 1984-1985 U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C. 1985 Policy Research Corporation, Chicago, IL. 1985 Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR. ( 1985 National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. I 1985 Texas Department of Human Resources, Austin, TX. 1985-1986 Alaska Public Employees Association, Juneau, AK. 1985-1987 Energy Resource Consultants and State of Colorado, Denver, C0. 1986 USDA-1890 Regional Research Project-4. 1986 Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 1986 The Burke Company, Cincinnati, OH. 1987 University of Guam Cooperative Extension, UOG Station, Guam. 1987 Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL. 1987 National Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA. 1988 University of Texas, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Austin, TX. 1988 RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc., Boulder, CO. 1988-1989 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Regional Office of Inspector General, Atlanta, Georgia. K. OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES 1. Professional Meetina Presentations: Fifty scientific papers; arganized and/or chaired twenty-eight sessions. 2. Committees and Boards of Professional Associations: Publications Comittee, Resolutions Comittee, Membership Comittee, Program Comittee, Constitution Comittee (Chair), Publications Comittee (Chair), and Nominations Comittee of Rural Sociological Society; Program Comittee and Publications Comittee of Pacific ' sociological Association; Membership Comittee and Program Comittee of American Association for Public Opinion Research; Comunity Section Liaison Committee; Environmental Sociology Section Council, American Sociological Association. Editorial Board, Public Ooinion Quarteriv. 3. Referee and Editorial Responsibilities: Editorial Board, Public Ooinion Quarterly, 1983-1987; referee for manuscripts submitted to American Sociological Review, Rural Socioloav, Sociological Ouarterly, Social Science Research, Housino and Society, Social Forces, Canadian Journal of Socioloov, Evaluation and Procram i Plannino, Socioloav and Social Research, Public Ooinion Quarterly, Democraohv, Pacific Sociological Review, Urban Affairs Quarterly, Social Science Ouarterly, Journal of Leisure Research, Journal of 16 G-
OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: (continued) Soil and Water Conservation, Land Economics, Social Science Journal, Human Organization, Sociological Inouiry, DLQ.wth and Chance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Sociological Methods and Research, Housino and Society, Annual Review of Socioloav, Journal of Official Statistics; research proposals submitted to Competitive Grants Program of,the National Science Foundation, United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute for Mental Health, Western Rural Development Center, and Canadian Social Research Council. 4. Soecial Review Panels: USDA Cooperative State Research Service Reviews of Departments of Rural Sociology at University of Wisconsin, Cornell University, Iowa State University, North Carolina State University, University of Kentucky, and Montana State University; National Institute for Mental Health research proposal review. 5. University Addresses and Invited Seminars: Eastern Washington University (1972); Brigham Young University (1974); Utah State University (1974); Iowa State University (1975); Western Washington University (1976); Portland State University (1976); University of Idaho (1979); University of Arizona (1980); University of Nevada (1980); University of Wyoming (1980); University of Kentucky (1980); University of Wisconsin (1980); University oi' Georgia (1981); The Pennsylvania State University (1981, 1984); Universities of Mannheim and Heidelberg (joint, 1985); Texas A&M University (1983); Cornell University (1984, 1986); University of Leyden (The Netherlands) (1985); Free University and University of Amsterdam (joint,1985); Oregon Health Sciences University (1985); University of Missouri (1986, 1988); University of Guam (1987); University of Washington (1987); City University of London (1987); University of Louisville (1987); University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (1988); and Marshall University (1988). 6. Keynote and Other Ma.ior Invited Addresses: M. E. John Invited Lecture, The Pennsylvania State University (1984); National Conservation Tillage Conference (iso 4); North Central Region Agricultural Deans and Directors Conference on Issues Facing Agriculture (1985); American Association of Housing Educators (1985); National Community Resource Development Program Leaders Workshop e (1985); Washington Planning Association (1985); American Agricultural Eco p ics Association Conference on the 21st Century (1985); Cornell University Biennial Extension Conference (1986); University of Guam Annual Extension Conference (1987); Expert Seminar on Survey Methods, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1987); European Conference on Mail and Telephone Survey Methods, Mannheim, West Germany (1987); Economic and Social Research Council Postal Survey Seminar, London, Englard (1987); Washington State University All-Faculty Extension Conference I (1987); State Councils of Government Jobs, Education and Technology Conference (1987); Great Plains Agricultural Conference (1987); North Dakota Rural Health Conference (1988); Small Community Revitalization 17 - g.
h( l W OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: (continued)' y Forum (1988); The Ireland Agricultural Institute Information s E LTechnology Conference-(1988); USDA Rural Intercity. Transportation ' Utah' Rural,Eco)nomic Summit (1988); and National Agricu Natural Resources Program Leaders Workshop-(1988). 7. Survey Seminars. Courses. and Workshoos: Distinguished Trainer, two-day seminar, 0hio Department of Mental Health (1984).. Seminar leader for.. intensive USDA-CSRS sponsored one-week. workshop on improvement of survey research skills for 30-faculty:from the "1890" Land-grant Colleges and Universities (1984).- Application of the Total Design ~ Method to the Dutch and German-situations sponsored by the German. Center for Survey Methods and Analysis (1985). ' Washington' State Legislative Committee. Staffs (1987); American Statistical. Association. Tutorial (1987); American Hospital Association (1987); Council for Advancement:and. Support of Higher Education (1987); Center for Health Research'(1987); U.S. General Accounting ~0ffice (1988); College of Educatiun. Distinguished Scholar Fund, Marshall University (1988); Department of Community' Development, University of Missouri (1988); Inspector General's Office,.U.S. Department of Socialz and Health Services (1988). 8. Legislative Testimony: Washington Joint Select Committee on Telecommunications (1985, 1987); Washington House Committee on Agriculture and Rural Affairs (1987); Washington House Committee on Economic Development (1987);-U.S. Senate Committae.on Small Business (1988). 9. Faculty Associate for Visitina Fulbriaht Scholars: Anton Nederhof, from. the University of Leyden, The Netherlands (1982); Edith DeLeeuw from the Free University, The Netherlands (1987). 10. Board Responsibilities: Western Region Social Research Advisory Committee-(1973-1976, Chair 1975); Western' Rural Development Center Advisory Committee (1973-Present, Chair 1982); Partnership for Rural . improvement Regional Coordinating Committee (1976 1981, Chair 1976-1977); State Board of Directors Family-Community-Leadership (1980-1983, = Secretary 1982); USDA National Rural Development Advisory. Council (1986-1988); Northwest Policy Center (1988); and Seattle Heahh Group Cooperative (1988). 11. Graduat'eStudentCommitteesChaired: Six (6) Masters of Arts and sixteen (16) Doctors of Philosophy. 18 i -pr.
L.- MEMBERSHIPS Professional American ~ Association for Public Opinion Research American Association for the Advancement of Science American Association of Housing Educators American Sociological Association Rural Sociological.' Society i World Future. Society . i Honorary: Phi Kappa Phi Alpha Kappa Delta Gamma Sigma. Delta Alpha Zeqa f 1 I i 19 u. 4
p ' = - ~ ~ ' ' ' _,. - - - - - ~ - - jf w v.- i M!!NDRANDLH h p T: ' O. 3ra
- 7. Everett J. " rafts
- 3. '4111an:
~ FRCN: Mi' lie Munree ' A~E: !!ovetter '3,
- 87-
SUBJECT:
IPEC:AL NIE05 S"RVEY 'he Special Needs Survey f:r Massachusetts is finished. My imedia e-L encern is the hearing i= aired. ?escondents did not indicate tr.e type of 1 :cair ::ent or to wrat extent they were affected..'A ne=d.: <new if the person is "hard of hearing", " deaf", or "hearint imoaired". '4e coviously need to ask cre cuestions to assess t"eir needs. A' " Hearing-I.caired Survev" needs to be done. A ouestionaire should be mailed to these in:'.viduals.
- n view of the colitical cli. ate and a chance of a coor resocese f :~.
individuals to NHY. I will sugrest having the Survey mailed back : ne of these deaf organizations.. '" hey will in turn rive it to ' Y.
- A sti;:end wouldn't hurt either).
~his would be consistant 'with New Hampshire's effort.
- will be contacting several deaf organizations for. inout into this task.
D.E. A.F., Inc., Massachusetts Association for the Deaf, and Massachusetts Comission for the Deaf. or/620 ATTACHMENT B -A/- _ __=_-_ __-
Public SeMee of New %.4 ao i ~ New HamDSnire Yankee Division i -{ Septe=ber 13, 1987 l l Oear I;ecial "eeds Advocate. The enclosed poster has been designed by New Hampshire Yankee to help eva-luate Spec:.al Needs and Elderly populations for e=ergency preparedness at Sea:r:ck Station. Io=e handicapped and elderly individuals have specialized needs and we . would lide to assist them in making their needs known. This infor:ation will also assist e=ergency personnel during man-made disasters such as industrial accidents, chemical spills or a natural disaster such as hurri: anes, tornadoes, and fl ods. Please display this poster in a highly visible space. We would also appre-ciate the s:all black and white copy included in any newsletter as a public servi:e to these individuals. ) Thank you for your cooperation. !f you should have any questions regarding the enclosed infor=ation, please contact =e at 1-603-474-9521 extension 3804 l Sincerely, 77(lLblG. .uwLa_ Millie A. Munroe Offsite Emergency Response Organization Special Population Coordinator f i
- This mailing was assembled by Greater Newburyport Opportunities Workshop.
ATTACEMENT C - AA -
s no e d i nd ta on lu e a e p mr o s b'e o p yc e s r a f m o d u e:ab mwn Nl e u i o n c s r e o n n r er a u k o me i em c rh nAMop l pi e o0 s yl 0 ad n c e t na n apeegn 0' 3 ed l i y r y a /, e c lr c e n me d e em 0 e ic g a 2 r n ee y y n l a c l r r s h mr pf f e u u o u a I o "n i o nbb ny N i.iC7 t s yo wi S ei e e Ts e4 vt l v v ea no r a e a en
- c ut s
SNSh L o a2 e s i ak .t t' m e t e a go n0 e e i3 m n o P 0 ^s l r v i n0 r b t a o2b n c f i 0 u c i 7 n a t d S a i n r4 8 r e y e2 e o h r d h Hk c O o ui0 t t t s r s0 r n iei ob n8 u 1 of O (' es pwcI r n o nwye l lal f r a o uNiacc u u Yt G e o egb pey r n t s o s oiws at i ee c h w e s rl a po e YlmbNWipt u n i l q s, o ai ee c r e ol I h udi l wt eeo ow f e r y h e Nfo f ww I i I
w-c' ,.z.,i_ s .-3, t t i -;c t s w
- J f--
~ I 1 ',3, ...';.~. f - ft.,ji,q.,' 3 ,. ; ;., ; ; ; ;, : g ;. j, 7_. g y.; . ;.5 t ,.t
- ?
-Te
- ) - S 's 9Y
,h'*,4() [ f $ :.' *g j,,j .} y*, {-l* .~.. t., ..r. ........s. 3. s -,1. 4,..,...,3...,... ) 4-.. 4..a. ....t. s..s. - 1' 1 4
- 3..
.3
- .... +....
.g.... .g..'. a y... 3....-..., ;.,...,., + 3.23-...... .I.-,,r....g a.., ? ,i.....2.., ..A6. -4.- ..a. i. .J ......ss... ,1.=,. J, s. ...,a., . i i.... .3 2.: a, a e d 2.- =.. ..._....3. =.'..-. a n.. a g ' s* =. '....# o....a..*.* n... 3 pe:p.e :.e :. :a n. : k.ow as
- ....s
.. eaves : hem vu,nurable :s : ize. u .:,.,.,,....,.aaa..n........ye.., ,..n.,.v 5,.. a u s e. u.,..y
- ... a s
..s a..
- e :
- alled 12 households personal'y :o verify informa:ica.on the
's ;:ve v
- .:ss Aces:ury. All-12 con:a::s were pleased : hat I called.
They ve;e :'.ea:'y pressed with our effer:s. ?so people s:sted : hey were an:i iea::::k :.: thev :ommended us for " caring enough to call." .g .+ Telephone' con:act is :i=e consuming and tedious.
- However, i
resul:s .:g..: :e wor:h :he ef fort: 9 mge
- s..
ATTACHMENT D M-i_ _ _ _ - - - - - _ -
4. e
- e.'@ '
e - =.. *,.-. ...:t ,,1 -a.. = *
- s..
.g , s .=. e 3., *.... 0 4 3 .= '. ....e,. ..e. *.13.. a. , 3,. .e. y a.. 4.,. 4. ......m..a..
- ,a...
4.... .... 44 ..a. .,.a. 91. .3.. ..e ....d...J J. 3 ;.
- s....,
3 .a._... -2.a, .. J,. a.....
- a.. s.
2.A.. s..... 2 4.....-. 2. ...4..,.a. a.... .a 3. 3 .,J 4.,. j ...u.s .4.3 .... 3 2. l 4 I l i ..gg.s.4 ,a. .n 23 3La. s..4.. s p. g g. 4 "2
- 2... 43 t
2 w.3 o g. .u.. r,...g 3..... 3 3 a.a.!. 34..,. 3.......f 4.,. v......aC .e.3S.,,,.... .2 ,........a.. .ev.. .. a, a. d .3..-....#. - s.. .e -=.por..as w.' .en. ~'. ; s .a 1 . : ma: ema:i:':. possiole. Th e same num e r was us'ed in following repor:s. .'e 5.sve no verification on mailing dates. (y.eter d's) ?rcoi f ...or. i, 4; ..s. I i - :3R should send BTRY all remaining questionairs. They are pre-a.,. 14.. 3... 4 3. ..g. i ele I 23. 7.
pm,,,
- r-wm'-
' ~ i [ ..p. : e-1 ( k i.* ' I .1,..... 6. ...a v. <..:i:.. e 2 ..3 ...,,2 3,....3 .p. .p...,.
- 3.
.pg.
- m..,y, J
J...... ...42 .s 4- .s . a. 3. f ..,..i4 .z.....(
- a....._....
> 4., ......,.s....... 1., .,,.3.. ...3.... .,3g... .. 3.:.g .3 u2. ..a.. g ...a.:.,.a ..a. 1g.:.,. .,a 8 ..,,..:..~.,.y
- 3
.u.a s s. ....e.. 3. .....a 3.,. .: 4.,... 3.ssk.is essev..ia.' as... ...,,.,..,...;,,s.....e. w,..g ..a, , 3 3.e ,~,v.., ,x,,....., .. s ,a hes:;,:as i:: Survey need to be snor: concise, clear and disigned :: ./ ex: 2:: :er:.nen: i..fo rma tion fo r e.e rge ncy p.1anning purposes. 3 a ssL/301.3 4j i ' 34 - _m .m. ' - - - - ' ^ - - - - - - ' - - - _m -_m.
m '},, 1 (0 '.,. ' 'd s .., g;:.q; t - _:q : y bi 8 -[ - i .,f v: .
- n..a,-- 6......y-p
) U' U J- - nse-* . O. ;, ;, -,- - "33 3 ,33..;. n. ;. %
- ^.-:.09":2:3:..** :*- aess:a 9ats a
~M;*s*Ae' - ; -j.;;;;er3;e
- ,3
,'7L54r '03'a'-a ~ 30 '3: Ore s s e s 3jy
- -0 34*t':3 a t ir "e s::. Oe'* t t :4't- '
- 3*- sa.ts 1-0,594;1 si..
ta. alf eats ~33 7 ",IA L ' 7,137 -oysera":s c - 1 -l 6 3 f =0UserCI:5. ^ *.tes:Ur'/,' M353 5Cnuse t ts ,o 400 Sero'OS witn ro resconcents 3,510 l :. 'HouSen01:s;urwilling.50. Coo 0er3te 2d 'ousencies aitn cac accresses m 4.11 Housencics with aescenscents witn impairments'- 165 "YJ l Housenoids witn r.o ucat rments 1,281 TOTAL 5.421 Housenoles ~ o t:a'n'" total housenolcs. 12,508 n 7eo
- wn-: T tal :cusenolds :with rasonocents 2,395
'7aol ewn t:tal housenolds with impairments 406 t
- - Two ::wri t0tal.hobseholds with bad ' addresses 954 TWo t:wn total'housenolds with no respondents 8,189-Two tcan t:tal rousenolds: With no impairments
'2,989 e ,t [ .' )[>.
- jg' '
4 0 C/CC2393.1 ATTACHMENT E. ??-_-__.___--------_---_-_-----_------------
)- ~ $, ,.e 's -'===. ....,..?
- ~ * * ' * =
...a se', e ' w O .'N.. J - C, ;; j ' AC*e*,w*.'.a :--a .. es J f ,e a a. 3 = e a. a. a. m e e ( 3 r .a .d...
- a ae
.,,ty ..e. e s. e. *=. .. =. =. = ew..m g a. g .ma y .e. g e e. a..=, .a g= ..=mgsses .a.4 e. .u.. 4.-.3 s*- a..a.s .a,.,.. .a g... .,.. 3 3 p..a a. m
- 3
.* 2.1 ~0TAL 5,42' 4 4 5 l 1 i i I i C/CC2393.2 I ~ 5Y '" L _ __-
7--- t tj _ e - a .. !.,/.1 s - 1.... . m. c..-.a.i. t. . 1 c...,. :. /,...:.. ..,,-a .w. . 3..+....... 2.......n.3 .a .s,.,.. .....,.3.. 3 .a ( .....s... ...a 3 3... 53 3 2 .. s....,. 3,,... 3,, 3.,.. 33.... 2 3... ..a ..33....a . 23 1 1 -l ~OTAL 5,421 l l l I I i j 1 I i, l i 1 i i I i I I C/CC2393.2 .. p
_;~__--- n' i .e:.:..... S :pij g y . +: .- --....S ........y, " ss,0,ay33 73 -- s : v- -
- -. e..-
i f -;ase : ' ; 4.3 .--.n.s a. .~. .-.-a...., .s.. -0239":':3 a-
- s: 3:c esses
,f) se:}:3 n ta es:; ;ents..'-- ; :3 - e;.s -:.se : :s -- o,- a'--=...s 3,373 -.~u 4 .e s4 ~- f h ' ,9
- ., 4 4,-
g C/CC2393.5 I -- Sa - l l
.e e. ..;......../ y ..d 3... g _: s. =.., Lm. g u.g e -.3 < : '. m.. ~1 (. ....... q c. ~... u., e. : i. - ..,.a. .'.,..,..,,. 2... g. y.3 .a 3 .a... .....,.3.. a %39" J3 n*** 3 0 3'Qf"eSS95
- *1
\\. 5.......g .... c a. -. <. .a ,3.. 3..... 3 .,,. 1 ..u.. .D. d. O. .E g% O M .E O -$90 Og.. 9 W. SW% g g . wdM = y eQr C/CC2393.6 -3/ - l i w,., _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. 1 1
t e. 1 .b l . P O '.. *.. 00 3 L.r y :st CU52HOLC5 '.E.3URY, 135 A CHUS ETT3 -:.:t 0!cs at:- -: - escencents
- 39
..a,... ~...;.. a., 33 ...a...,i....... .e c.. ....,33,.3 .,3 ....n. 3.... ..a. ,.n.3 a3....,
- s i - -
- a.. a 5
...,,n,. ..a 3,. ...a 7CTAL 1,573 / p,,.-g 4 YY9 1 C/CC2393.7 1 1 l l h - $1 --
r i +- '3LE 3.3-1 I f*AXIM'.'M Evac;'a7 *:;0 ::FU' AT.ON cen< L 'd0u s e nO
- c s Ser.anent
- coy
- s t 0.-
o 3;rvev
- es* ents
- ts'
.;g. -a e --.- 2 e e.j 9 r ames:;ry 5,421 14,258
- ?,359 we--
3: 1,390 4,420 6,073 West *:enoury 1,167 3,296 a,630 TOTA. 21,974 30,066 Host Commun' v Of Beveriv Saliscury 3,373 6,726 18,919 Newourycort 7,187 16,414 23,481 Newoury 1,673 S,479 10,476 TOTAL 28,519 52,875 07aL waSPACutSETTS EPZ 20,211 50,593 82,944 NOTES: 1 Numoers are cerived from the Seabrook Station Evacuation Time Study and Traffic wanagement Plan Update, August 12, 1986, KLO Associates, Inc. and from the_c spapiled through the aerial survey of seacoast ereas in Massacnuse ~ New Hampshire conducted July 18, 1987 by Avis Airmap of Braintree, husetts. These figures are subject to update as part of tne continuous planning process. 2. Peak occulation total reflects summer, midweek data. 3. Evacuation is conducted on a municipality-ey-municipality basis. 1 of 1 Revision 0 C/CC2393.9 -3 5_.
R. i .l *
- e. p c.
.. L,.. = - 5 e.: R,/ c.Y -.,,J a- .u. s.,. e -
- ...,., 4
,,,,Se.. a ..-.S=.... i: c__ i ' s
- -as::r.:e :s
-: se :
- ,32;
+ ' sea: i:s -a-
- ::cerste 105 "s9 esc sc:resses
-:.se : 2,351 -cuse ics <. 9 ese:n=ents witn " :st-ents 2,57 -:_se : ' : <. - -
- 4 cair :ents 2.
- 5 TOTAL 20,211 i
4 + 4'f=. 44 ,4 ..)f** u m, 9 I i l 1 l l l C/CC2393.3 i -w
m
- S-MEMORANDUM MM-
[ I I 70: a. -;as ;.5 g F:ANAS - : - 5: /)M
- t\\
p. 5 =Res:
- 2:::r
- . x, s-5:.:
5: 5. -c;, OATE: 3 55.:' A A v 65 M V V SLB.lE07 -
- AS5aC:-LSET 5 SFE:~a. '.!!:5 SURVEY SU ne 5:ecta: Nee:s Survey ::ne ':P " essa:nusetts crocuceo 05? res:Orce9ts nno nc ca e: : ey nac an im airmen-e.g. sign:. nearing, m:o113:y; ar.
may ec.,:re s:ecial attention ey : e w C. 1004 O' : ese res::nses sn:c*: ce ve- "*e cy teieonone contact so : a: : eta
- e:
in :rta: n can ce :::airec on :Pe s:e:i
- neecs of eacn inciv : cal.
7 e :.r. d cese of ; ts ver' dica ten is :::
- e: ermine tre tyces of assistance ano ecutoment whien may ce recuarec
- y tre rescencent (e.g. amou'.ance, cus, aneelenair van, ese: tai o: ' :a-.
2. Orovice tne most efficie*1: allecation of corsonnel anc rescurces in tre NHY ORO, ano: 3. to fulfill tne requirements of ;EMA Guicance Memorandum - 24 Attacnec is memo is tne crecesec Survey Verification Form, anten onene staff wcul to verify tne 653 res::nses. It is estimatec eacn :eiecnone cai* w111 .roxiestely 20 mtng es, not including necessary :all nacks cue to cusy si etc. Basec en :nis assumotion, it wouic :a<e acoreximately 327 work hours to complete tne vert'tcation. This oces not inci.ce ene time to recruit anc : rain eersonnel 4 to maxe :ne cnone calls or the tiae :: sacervise tneir efforts. It snould a*so ce notec :nat :ne majority of tnese :nene calls will neec to ce mace adter worn nours in cr:er to reacn :eooie wnen : ey are at home. 1 .*SS2322 ATTACHMENT F gg-
e ana.etes *: ce ce e 91 ee 5 aa: 5 06:0 cerf:-* - S acr< 3.: a e- ::es '- .9eeC :: Ce9'n-l* ter*5 cf an0 ::e$ : e aork. :eeare:ree-5 a* -- as acu.: s;;;es. 1 .:- :e ex s: ; staff Setters :r :5NH velar:ee s : stre: :y .,rv 3:394 r ex s-095.': ants. 9 s et :: s acvantage:us in : a: acu': :e
- s-g d#
C*S: f ?0**Ve anc fairIV eBSy :: :: r *na:! Snc 5.cervise. -taever, -s 0 0 -: c' v'*-* 55 a c: te: v' 5:=r: ace. an cr v :. i :---:*-
- e r:Nn v.s::mer ers ce :e. : ner.
e 5:.an age s - a: - ey se:.:: e els/ !O :*3 - s :e - ey Cel' a'
- : e geae.*3: :. i : :3 :- 3'
- ssss, e - s3c'.Br:3;e is :*a:
3;3 - *3y *:: e v ewee 35 an ::;e:-.e 3::r:3: a ...,.g.,.... 1 .3,. 3. -3.e a L:s ce 'sarvey '--. - 3 ee :y '.- Stad' r ex s:
- : s.':3 :s.
- .?: e:e : e :e'e:n:ne ve- ' :2: :-
is e- :: is acvar:3;e:.s 3-a-
- .:s :e f - ac.aic :e v =wec as ::;e:: ve a :::aining s.rvey
-d:r a: :e
- e5.'is c' e " Ore ver #
03** - aCL
- e e"Ce1Ve SS n:.e t'*!:*e.
3 0.' ce * :e tra e
- te.e : 5.See 3 S*S1 ar met.900
-et-esen :- ': tae Ne 25 3 -en
- s.
e
- ss:vants;e is - s
- - s e:a:c
- ui: :e mere expers ve :
- emer:
- nan v::* zing in-ncese e :::yees ar:
d ny e u e a s.:s:3nt 3: s ar:.: ed'or:
- e searcn f:
a ' - an ne
- ::eS5**g Of :- ::SaI5 an:.r:r3Se Orcers.
.n -*'****-* BS t: aren *: 59 u'
- e - e. ae,.ee.t trat it net:5 : e c molete cy
- e exercise 5: **at trere
- 5 an LO-::-cate '*S: Cf SceCiai ee S *:V La's at - e -3vern 1: 5: aging A.en.
- r 300 -
n,
- e felicw-uc cncre ver ' :3 t;-
S r.c u ' 00 One 55 500n 85 Oc5s'C'e 3d e tre rescenses nave een *e:gr e: a-- 'e ne s. sey 5 ' es
- e "es :c:e-is n Os.
ne survey aas ::m:'e:e:
- e - Nevetter 387.
- n
- e :: ::mele e :nis ac,v :) ae acu'.: a re:iate 1: if ycu acu:: ev en ne er::csee me:necclegy anc crevi:e.s at:n your ::mments anc sugges 3:es r re ces aay :: oreceec.
e f? 5 melair cc. *. N. 3:uener
- . wunree c.- n34.
4.- w f& '
r - \\ s -'
- SPECIAL NEEDS SURVEY VERIFICATION FORM L
~ ~:ME : !! :" ::NTA07: eference a
- sge :
1 -el*:.
- s at neme? ~5is is New -amesn e <anket t: serl d
- vest - nai e you suom$ttec fer Emergency P'aay *nformat*
- n :n - e Emergenc o ver dy :re -formation on tre Questionnaire?ning.
- o you nave a few v mutes
.er dy Name.anc scelling) Of smoairec 3es10ent*31 100ress
- a11' g accress :: 8 Ot d'erent)
- s t.e imcairec t seasonal res1:ent?
- f yes, anten montns?
Teleonene Numcer(s) 1.ge t ,cas.ec 1rciv1aual d Gencer 3. Name d ai;ercResponcer c lationsnio with impaired e ! aller /Pesconcer telepnene No(s) Mailing Address j? 4 De of isqpeirments: Hearing Eye (elind) Empnysema Dialysts Mentally Retarded /Ill Wheel Chair Beoridden Seizure Disorcer g Walker / Cane ~ b Other Life Support Heart Patient Describe Descrice: Comments on Imoairment: C/LK2808 ATTACHME!Q G
3. /ce :d ~ .t'e-Sustatning Eculoment: tnx *jpe seso rater .: con..ng; uraisse fpe Resotrator f_ I*ectrically Operatec 4esotrator (Chest) ~ setion Macntne ( umo) i L_ t -emocialysis Ecuipment !<ioney Macntre)
- ^.t e rm i t ten t Positive 8 essure m
icecial Air Concitaoner (4eason: esotestor Ly
- <ygen Other,
- lease :escr :e:
Coes - e ecuicment nave a cacKuo cower source? (ce s
- s - e ecuiement I
- Ortsoie?
i i 5. Oces tne 'moairec rave any :ecial Gescr ce: . : ansocrtation requirements? an t.e impairec sit ao at all for a snort perioc? 1 "s tne recuireo transportation Eccessiple to the impai ed? "f o, anat r/pe of transportation is necessary?,_ 1 i
- of cece'e s: transcort Coes anyone in the nousenold crimarily speak a language other Descrice:
tnan Englisn? 3.
- s soecial notification requirec cue to hearing impeirment?
Or other roesent dow you be contacted in an emergency? NeigfGSr? Telechone? 3__
- s there a responsible person living in the household who could ass the imcaired in an emergency?
Names Is there a close ns.:gnbor who could essist the impeired in an em y Name: i I C/LK2802.1 - 3r-
.4' [..;g_ .1. .:oes - e 'mostrec nave m otner :roolem t st ae reec to: xcow aoout?
- Thanx fou sery muen for your t*me.
'ou may ce contactec o i . 31rections,to your ouse er any otner matters trat may comence;again to c'arity e c:nt'actec in an actual emergency, to confirm your atecs ano arrange d:- uo. /ou will also 38fe. *3nSDort, a5 FeQuired. your Manns again and Have a Nice Cay! r f.. l I. l i: 6 i ' ~4
- 'h_:,,~EO
- k,h,.l?
f C/LK2808.2 -y
i ?.. Emergency Preparedness Project Questionnaire Is anyone 'in your household impaired to the degree that they would require 1. essistance during an evacuation? Yes -No if you answered "NO", please refo!d and real this card using the instructions given on the reverse. side. Thank you for your assistance. you answered "YES", please supply the following information:
- 2. Name(s) of impaired.
Type of impairment (s): Check all that apply) person (s): Hearing Sight Wheel-Confined Other* Impaired Impaired chair to bed b,,% 7-
- 1f "other," please specify the nature of the impairment (s).
Jelephone number: s. Home: Work: ATTACHMENT H 'Va-
1 0
- 4. If your name or address on the mailing label is incorrect, please give the correct I
information: Name Address City State Zip i
- 5. If the person completing this card is not the addressee, please provide the following information about yourself:
Name Address City State Zip Telephone number - Home: Work: Your relationship to addressee: l
- 6. Should we have to verity any of this information, when would be the best time to call?
Please fold and seal this questionnaire using the glue strip provided. Be certain that the business reply face is on the outside when returning questionnaire. No postage is { necessary. j ) Ap-No POSTA M% NECESSA
- '"As,
I{"!M'- IF MAILE I IN THE - UNITED sT, BUSINESS REPLY Mall rwun ru ns nawr e nm onc e m POSTAGt WEL M pac SV AD04SSEli m l Emergency Preparedness Project Post Omco Box 11095 es-mme Chicago, filinois 60611 8""" i susemsme 1 1 "'~
. g. 3., SEABROCE EPZ PROJECT FOR NASSACEUSETTS RESI ~ AVAILAS'ILITY OF EVACUATION ASSISTANCE FINAL COUNTS NUMBER PERCENT CAN GET ASSISTANCE YES 259 46.1% NO 303 53.9% N AL 562 loo,og 1 E 'h
- i. 2 4
ATTACHMENT I - h --
+ r- . ;4.v ...- s . ) /'y..s t.
- 4. :
...w: .; n i !, ?- // / e i O 7 i ;. r' SEABROOK EMERGkNCY PREPAREDNESS--PROJECT EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
.e a i J 4,, i. f c 1 h lT 1: .I 1 o!; l... I. l l 3 l l ~ ATTACHMENT J J -vs - l 1
i SEABROOK EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROJECT EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I. PURPOSE International Survey Research Corp. was engaged by the Impell Corp. to conduct the Special Needs Survey for Massachusetts residents within the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone surrounding the Seabrook nuclear power generating station. The purpose of the. survey was to identify persons living in non-institutional residences who are physically impaired to the degree that they would require assistance in the event of an emergency evacuation. To be licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the plant have a plan in place which would provide for the orderly must evacuation of all residents in the Zone should an emergency arise. The information collected by ISR would be used by the. planners in determining how physically impaired residents would be removed from the area. II. METHODOLOGY Work on the project began in early 1987 with the design of a questionnaire by ISR. Drawing upon questionnaires used success-fully in similar pecjects for other facilities, ISR applied its expertise in instrument design to make the questionnaire as easy to understand and complete as possible. These steps include using large typefaces and international symbology for impairments. The instrument was constructed as a self-mailing document; after completion, it could be folded, sealed,.and returned to ISR via postage paid business reply mail. (See Exhibit A). The recipient'was first asked whether there were any persons in the household who were impaired to the degree that they would require assistance i the event of an evacuation. If "Yes", further informat requested regarding tha impaired person (sl: the natu 4Mk impairment (s), corrected address and telephone numbers ho'usehold (and respondent, if not the addressee,) and the an.to contact.the respondent if other information was need ' question on whether there was someone in the household without impairments who could ass - in an emergency was added at the request of the planners. .ru cespondent was then asked to fold, seal, and return the questionnaire to ISR. If the recipient responded "No" to the first question, he/she was instructed to seal and return the questionnaire. A cover letter was provided by Public Service of New Hampshire for inclusion with the questionnaires. The letter, signed by l - it-L.
Mr. Terry Harpster of PSNH. stated the purpose of the survey and urged all recipients to respond. Both pieces - questionnaire and cover letter - were inserted in envelopes with International Survey Research as the return address and the message "IMPORTANT QUESTIONNAIRE ENCLOSED" prominently displayed. The target population consisted of residents in eight Massachusetts 'tcwns: Amesoury, Byfield: :te r r ima c, Newbury, Newburyport. West Newbury, Salisbury, and Salisbury Beach. At the outset it was estimated that 17,000 households existed in this area. ISR was to be furnished with three sets of mailing labels, along with a computer tape containing the names and addresses of targeted house-holds. ISR was subsequently informed that there would be only one set of mailing labels and no computer tape, and that some 19,000 households would be surveyed. On May 13, ISR received the labels. A manual count was taken, and 21,137 labels were found. The labels for all towns except Merrimac were drawn from utility billing records, and some attempt had been made to remove non-residential addresses. The Merrimac labels were allegedly drawn from voter registration rolls, and had only l'ast ISR questioned the use of voter registrations as they would names. probably be incomplete, but were informed that no other alternative. existed. The Merrimac labels were examined and 74 obvious duplicates removed. ISR arranged to have the labels keyed onto a computer tape. During the keying process, 20 labels were deleted due to insufficient address or duplication. This left 21,042 valid addresses. Impell representatives were notified of the unexpectedly large number. ISR was directed to send questionnaires to all addresses. While the labels were teing sorted out, ISR developed the software to administer and track the survey process. Two databases were designed to supply the cequired information. One, called MAIL HASTER, would contain one record for every household. This record would have the names and addresses as supplied by Impell, as well as a response code. When the database was loaded with the keyed names and addresses, every household record was assigned a unique j six digit identification number. The first digit represented the recipient's. town, and the last digi t was a " chock digit". (A check i digit la ted bv adding and subtracting combinations of the first It allows the ID number to be validated, preventing five di the we ord feca being updated due to a data entry error.) v The MAIL'NhSTER was used to generate mailing labels and track j responses. When the first set of labels were produced, the response code on every record was set to 'l'. As questionnaires were returned, { the response codes were updated as follows: '2' = No impairment; '3' = Impairment; '4' = Returned for bad address. When a questionnaire was received indicating impaired persons in a household, the data from that questionnaire was placed in a second database, called IMPAIRMENT. This file would be the source for all reports on impaired individuals. I I l
- c. vi -
F y + -3 On Friday,-June 26th, ISR received word from Impell to mail out [' the questionnaires immediately. The mailing took place on Monday, I June 29. Within several days ISR began to receive large numbers of envelopes returned for bad addresses. These were spot-checked against the a~ddresses provided by Impe11 and were found to be i correct. Impell representatives were notified, but could offer no explanation. As questionnaires were returned to ISR the responses were keyed and the databases updated. On July 13.and again on July 17. response i counts were computed and forwarded to Impell. By early August questionnaire returns had slowed considerably, and the second mailing was planned. Returns to this point were as follows: Impairments indicated 405 No impairments indicated 2,930 Returned for bad address 2,374 Invalid response
- 332 5,636
- Blank or defaced questionnaire.
The second mailing was originally intended to go only to the house-holds which did not respond to the first mailing. However, the unexpectedly large return for bad addresses (11% of the total sent) was still a concern. There was some speculation that because the area encompassed many vacation / resort properties the population might be fairly transient. To thwart that possibility, it was decided to add a line to the address label under the name that would read "CA CURRENT RESIDENT" and include the bad address locations in the second mailing. Another minor change was to exclude from the second mailing those who returned questionnaires uncompleted but with comments stating opposition to the Seabrook facility and the survey process. A list of persons who responded in that manner directly to the facility was forwarded to ISR and combined with those received by ISR. A total of 109 names were deleted from the second mailing. (Many more questionnaires were returned with negative remarks, but had all identi ng information obliterated or removed.) The seco ling was sent out on August 14 to 17,599 hous7 holds. Once aga .large nusher of questionnaires were returned for bad 1 3 addresses Jobgh not quite as many as before. All of these came from the sam 6 addresses as the first mailing. On September 9, an interim report on responses through August 28 was sent out at the request of Impe11. By mid-Septe'aber the return rate had diminished to a trickle. The collection period was cutoff on September 18, with 4,270 questionnaires returned. Responses to the second mailing were: 272 with impairments, 2134 with no impairments, 1746 bad addresses, and 118 others (blank or defaced questionnaires, with a few duplicates from people who responded too late to the first mailing to be excluded from the second.) yG -
-4 [* A final set of reports was sent out on September 23. (See Exhibit B for statistiqa1 summaries.) The total returns from the project w . ere: Impairments indicated 653 No impairments indicated 4,093 Returned for bad address 2,374 Invalid or no response 13,122 21,042 III. CONCLUSIONS The fact that over 26% of surveyed households returned valid question-naires should be considered quite good, considering the nature of the project and the controversial environment in which it was j conducted. Two areas of concern remain: the extraordinarily high return for bad addresses (11.3%) and the potentially incomplete Merrimac addresses. Both issues could impact the outcome of -the study. The only valid conclusion that can be safely made is that 653 house-holds in the area surveyed indicated the presence of one or more physically impaired persons, and that 4,893 households indicated -no impaired persons. There is no way to ascertain whether the people 4 who responded to the survey were representative of the population as a whole; thus it would be improper to infer or make assumptions about the non-respondents based on the data collected. 1 f Air' $l. I-1 99
- ~ - - - - -,. - - - i 9 3 e O T' EXHIBIT A SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE ~ i 4. I .p. a j .. )._ ,i -W-
f y, 1 L d l Emergency Preparedness Questionnaire For Massachusetts Residents
- 1. Is anyone in your household impaired to the degree that they would require assistance during an evacuation?
Yes-No if you answered "NO", please refold and seal this questionnaire using the instructions given on the reverse side. Thank you for your assistance. if you answered "YES", please supply the following additional information:
- 2. Name(s) of impaired Type of impairment (s): (Check all that apply) person (s) in your household:
Hearing Sight Whee 6-ConAnod Other* l Name Impaired Impaired chair to bed w-J 1 = 1 1
- lf "other," please specify the nature of the impairment (s).
j [
- 3. Are there other members of your household that do not have at:
-pairment who could assist the impaired in an emergency? Yes No au~~,-
,q 9 .g e o O EXHIBIT S FINAL STATISTICAL SUMMARIES l t i h '5 s.# -- 8 j s t -p
~l
- v., * -
SEABROOK EPZ PROJECT FOR. MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS l i i TYPES OF IMPAIRMENTS BY RESPONDENT HOUSEHOLD FINAL COUNTS j NUMBER PERCENT NEARING IMPAIRED NO 446 68.3% YES 207 31.7% 7#k i 112 i TOTAL 653 100.0% jj o { SIG8T IMPAIRED S NO 481 7').7%
- 3 S
YES 172 26.3% TOTAL 653 1rj0.0g WHEELCHAIR ~ NO-543 83.2% YES 110 16.8% TOTAL 653 100.0% CONFINED TO BED NO 618 94.6% YES 35 5.4% TOTAL 653 100.0% OTBER NO 262 40.1% YES 391 39.9% V:e TOTAL 653 100.0% %ey I a i l -n-
..r ~ ~ SEABROOK EPZ PROJECT FOR MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS IMPAIRED PERSONS PER RESPONDENT HOUSE 50LD FINAL COUNTS NUMBER PERCENT IMPAIRED PERSONS NONE LISTED 18 2.8% 1 PERSON-547 83.8% 2 PERSONS 71 10.9% 3 PERSONS '12 1.8% 4 PERSONS 5 .8% l 1 TOTAL 653 100.0% i 1 4 I l I l l ~ l l 1 I l
- T i
s-i ____---_------------an---- -5
p. SEASIOOR'EFE PZ2 JECT FO3 MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS j AVAILABILITY OF EVACUATION ASSISTANCE { j FINAL COUNTS I NUMBER PERCENT 4 CAN GET ASSISTANCE YES 259 46.1% { NO 303 53.9% 'l TOTAL 562 100.0% t' ~gs -CS -
4 , O. ,e.. a i t e Ik >l 4 4 e csi:y P. I ) l' I-b Y' l
) /s' .r conP5 Anon May 26~, 1967 1630-009-NY-003 ) l International Survey Research 303 East Ohio Street Chicago, Illinois 60611 ATTENTION: John Haskin i Centlemen: As discussed'in our telecon of 5/21/87, attached is the approved version of the special needs survey and cover letter. Please proceed with the actions necessary to print and prepare the survey. When New Hampshire Yankee gives us the go-ahead, we will notify you to mail the surveys. If you have'any questions, please feel free to contact me at 603-474-9521 ext. 2730. Very truly rs, E h Impe11 Projoet Menegar REN/oc
- l Enclosure " It l:
itC l cci W. Mereens R. Seiter 1 1 i l 225 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD
- MELVILLL NEW YORK 11747*(516)420 3200 ATTACHMENT K
.ca.
j, i..J ' E.J D k Putse Servios etNew HampsNro New Hampshire Yankee Olvision l l l
Dear Massachusetts Resident:
f The enclosed survey.is being conducted to identify both physically impaired and non-impaired residents in your area. The information will be used by local and state emergency eenagement agencies and Public Service of New Hampshire in the event of'an emergency to provide assistance to our physically impaired neighbors. Should a disaster occur such as a tornado, hurricane, earthquake or nuclear emergency, residents with physical disabilities would receive special evacuation assistance. It is just as important to identify households without impaired family members. In planning for an emergency, local agencies will benefit from information on all households regardless of the somber's physical status Please take a few minutes to complete the questionnaire. . thanking you.for your assistance, we have enclosed a small gift as a tokenAs a w of our appreciation. Sincerely, ~ l k ' s'lL ' f \\ Terry L 01 Preparedness 1g '5&,_ *.' { l I i ATTACHMENT L -(4.- pa w m ~ - _ _ - -
d' _f'*+ T- - i j i 1 2 i l l L a 1 4 ) Emergency Preparedness Questionnaire For Massachusetts Residents l
- 1. Is anyone in your household impaired to the degree that they would require assistance during an evscuation?
4 Yes No if you answered "NO", please refeld and seal this questionnaire using the instructions given on the reverse side. Thank you for your assistance. If you answered YES", please supply the following additional information: 1
- 2. Name(s) of impaired Type of impairment (s): (Check all that apply) person (s) in your household:
Hearing Sight Wheel-Confined Other' l Name ,lg Impaired chair to bed 1 <!1M ~ xp:~ p
- If "other," please specify the nature of the impairment (s).
- rno IppInd f
- 3. Are there other members of your household that do not have an impairment who could assist in an smorgency?
q j 2 Wm N
~1 Annlicants' Rammensa The care and supervision of individual patients / residents in hospitals and special facilities remains the responsibility of the facility administrators. Interrogatory No. 39 ' Identify the person (s) in NNY's ORO who is most knowledgeable about the SPMC's plans and procedures for those persons in the Massachusetts EPE who any have special notification, evacuation or other needs. Annlicants' Rennense Applicants incorporate herein their response to interrogatory No. 29. Interrocaterv No. 40 Expla~in the meaning of the priority codes assigned to each special needs individual listed in Appendix M, and explain how these codes will be used. Annlicants' Rannensa Friority codes indicate the order in which to call special needs individuals and are based upon the type of need and transportation requirement. .g Interrogatory No. 41 ex ' the last special ne+ts survey conducted and when 6 that the next one will be conducted? How i frequent y will such surveys be conducted? &gg'licants' saanensa q The last special needs survey was conducted during the period June 1987 to September 1987. The manner in which the ATTACHMENT M -cc- ........................d
4 l t Special Needs List will be kept updated is discussed in the sPMc,.section 3.6.c special Population /Special' Facilities. Interroaaterv No. 42 Regarding the last special needs survey, identify the-persons or organization (s) that conducted the survey, and state how many surveys were mailed out and how many completed survey were (sic) returned? Amelicanta' Rannonae The last Special Needs Survey was done by International Survey Research Corporation. Initially, 21,042 surveys were sailed. A second sailing of 17,599 surveys was performed, for a total of 38,641 surveys. A total of 653 completed responses identified households with impaired individuals. Interroaaterv No. 43 Do you have any information concerning whether upon receipt of.the Special Needs Survey there were special needs individuals who refused to complete the survey, completed it I with factually incorrect information'and returned it, and/or turned in their surveys to advocacy groups. If so, please describe this information and identify any and all documents which concern such events and/or indicate that such things may have happened. ,7 - f Anelicanta e namne m e have no information regarding special needs individuals who may have completed and returned the servey with factually incorrect information or turned their surveys over to advocacy groups. NNY possesses approximately 12 letters and two documented phone calls indicating an unwillingness of some 59-
z I individuals to complete the survey form. These documents will be produced. The initial survey mailings produced preliminary findings that there were 653 households which indicated they had one or more individuals with impairments. This information was subject to verification efforts in the spring of 1988 which resulted in the confirmation of 352 impaired individuals. The difference between these two numbers reflect those surveys where it was found that the responder required further clarification of the information requested. Interroaaterv No. 44 Section 3.7.2 (f) of the SPMC (p. 3.7-3) indicates that a Special Needs Poster was distributed in the fall of 1987 to various advocacy groups in the six Massachusetts EPZ municipalities as well as agencias surrounding the EPZ. Please identify these advocacy groups and agencies by name and address. Anniiennts* Rannonna The computerized mailing list used for the distribution of the speci 1 Needs Poster to advocacy groups contains the names g approximately 380 such organizations (including some dup 1 . entrees). Applicants will produce this document. Interrogatory No. 45 Appendix M, p. M-17 (Amendment 4), indicates the number of mobility-impaired people with special transportation needs:. (a) for each town; and (b) the total number of such people in all six towns. The sua of the numbers set forth for each town, however, is substantially less than the number given as the total. Please account for this discrepancy (sic) and state the correct numbers for each town and the total. ~29- -L'-
-1 l ~. - s*' l Annlicants' Ramnense The discrepancy is due to administrative and arithmetical error. The numbers for each town are: Amesbury - 67, Merrimac - 33, Newbury - 27, salisbury - 53, Newburyport - 132, West Newbury - 8. The total is 320. l Intarrmantory No. as Appendix M, p. M-17 (Amendment 5), Note C indicates that the sources for the data on the mobility-impaired population were a special needs survey by International survey Research company, "by personal knowledge and references," and through i a special needs hotline. Regarding these sources: (a) Where is International survey Research Company located, and who was the person there who was principally responsible for conducting the survey; (b) state how many mobility-impaired persons were identified through each of these three sources; (c) Describe what efforts were taken, if any, to verify the information about those with mobility impairments obtained from these three sources. Annlicants' Ramnense i a) International Survey Research (IsR) is located in Chiango, Illinois. John Moskin and Gary Berger of ISR 4 incipally responsible for overseeing the conduct I special Needs survey. b) Applicants incorporate herein their response to interrogatory No. 47. Contacts through the special Needs Motline and "by personal knowledge and references
- confirmed data already gathered by the special Needs survey. j
- g..
c) See" response to (b) above. Interroaaterv No. 47 Identify all the sources useo to obtain the names, addresses, and other information about persons in the-Massachusetts EPZ with sensory impairments and persons with mental /eactional impairments and state how many persons were , identified through each of these sources. For each such (sic) also describe what efforte were taken, if any
- sources,
.to verify the information acquired about those with sensory, impairments obtained from that source. Annlicants' Raanenae The Special Needs Survey conducted by mail from June to September, 1987 by International Survey Research Corporation of chicago, IL, utilized utility customer billing records for Amesbury, Newbury, Newburyport, West Newbury, salisbury, Byfield and salisbury Beach. Voter registration lists were-used for the survey in the Town of Merrimac. The survey efforts identified 653 households where those responding indicated one or more people with impairments resided. In May, 1988, a telephone survey was undertaken to verify the information on the survey questionnaire. Where survey p ers could not be contacted or declined to the original information on the survey e questianesire was retained as valid. The result of this verification was the identification of 352 individuals with impairments that required special notification and/or transportation during an emergency. -es -
s* Interrogatory No. 48 Do you have any intention to change the methods used to identify persons in the Massachusetts EPZ with special needs?. If so, please describe these changes. Annlicants' Rennense No. Interroastery Ma. 49 How many unredacted copies of the special needs population listings contained ih Appendix M exist, who has them, and what steps have been taken to assure the security of this information? Amelicants' Ramnensa In total 33 unredacted copies of Appendix M have been issued by NNY. The list below identifies the. individuals or ORO positions holding / assigned a copy or copies. Access to the information is controlled by EP and Community Relations Procedure 90700 entitled " Proprietary Information Handling." A copy of the procedure will be made available for inspection. The only copy not subject to the above controls is that in asion of Judge saith of the Atomic Safety and Li Beerd. HOLDER A. Callendrello C.H. Heckscher Robert McCormack (15 Copies) Ropes & Gray, Mr. Thomas Dignan to
[j k
- ., s i
I l i Judge Ivan W. Smith e Charlotte Provencher Copies maintained at ORO EOC per Procedure 90700 for: Bus Company Liaison Evacuation Support Coordinator Radiological Health Advisor Special Population Coordinator Assistant Reception Center Coordinator Copies maintained at ORO Staging Area per Procedure 90700 for: Evacuation Support Dispatcher (4) Monitoring / Decontamination Leader (3) Staging Area 14ader Interrogatory No. 50 Are the original Special Needs Surveys that were returned still being maintained? If so, who has them, where are they located, and what steps have been taken to assure the security of this information? Anniiennts' Baenense The original Special Needs Survey forms and two computer prin are under the control of NNY and are locked in a I' stor within the owner's on-site controlled area. Only one individual has the key to this locked area. While the survey forms and co 4 uter printouts were in the possession of International Survey Research Corporation,.. -W-.
7 l l they were kept in locked areas on the company's premises when 1 not being used or reviewed by ISR personnel. Interroaaterv No. 51 From the_ time the Special Needs Surveys were returned, for each step in the process of collecting the completed surveys,. analyzing them, compiling the data, and producing the special population listings contained in Appendix M, state: (a) How many people had access to the acquired information j (b) Whether copies were made of the surveys of the ) information acquired; and j (c) What steps were taken to assure the security of the acquired information. i Amelicants' Rannonse a) The number of people with access to the special Needs survey data varied depending on the internal use being i made of the survey results, but is estimated at 20-25 individuals. Access was limited to those NNY personnel directly involved with the analysis,. verification and j processing of the data for use in developing the SPMC. The holders of 33 unredacted copies of the SPMC have to the information. b) its were made of the original computer printout of the special Needs survey results for use in the verification process. c) Applicants incorporate herein their response to interrogatory No. 50..gf_ j
r 4 dC J I h recatory No. 52 ~ what.date [ sic) gathering efforts, if any, have you or your agents undertaken to identify individuals willing and capable of assisting handicapped persens in the Massachusetts EPZ in the event of a radiological' energency at Seabrook Station? Amelicants' Rennensa I Other than recruitment of ORO personnel for this purpose, no additional drea gathering efforts have been undertaken. I Interrogatory No. By Describe any and all steps,oif any, your (sic) or your agents have taken to have persons with handicaps, their familien, and/or agencies serving or advocating for the handicapped review the SPMC's plans and procedures for protecting persons with handicaps. Describe the result of this review process and identify any and all communications i and other documents you and your agents have which concern this revitw process. annlicants' mannentm No sach review process has been undertaken. Interreanterv No. 54 the NNY ORO found an siternate location for the s apart from the one at 145 Nater Street in H , Nh? If so, iaentify the location selected. Amelieants' Raamanna A s'inulated mock-up in Sales, New Hampshire was used in the Juns 28 - 29, 1988 Exercise, but NNY does not consider this to be an alternate location. l __ l
Jo* Acelicapts' Reneense j Applicants.will produce any documents responsive to thi i i s request. .f \\ -Reauests Nos. 16(i) and (i) made after January.1,All correspondence and other records of comm i 1987, and which refer to ' contain information relevant to emergency. respo,nse planning pertain tc or for s~ radiological emergency at Seabrook engage in such planning, or the.assessmen,t of responseor the refusal to each of the following: capability, between New Hampshire Yanke and 1. individuals in the Massachusetts EPZ who are transportation assistance in the event of atrans radiological emergency at seabrook Station; j j. individuals in the Massachusetts Ep2 who have or may have sensory impairments, movement impairments or mental / emotional impairments, and org and individuals who assist such persons.anizations Amelicants' Rennensa. . As of December 21, 1988, Applicants have identified 502 special needs individuals who may need transportation and/or some other form of assistance. of those individuals, 139 are ) hearing impaired, 106 are sight impaired. { The remaining 257 individuals have some form of mobility impairment
- .g w.
l l l ~ - /(8 -}}