ML20247E484

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amend 75 to License DPR-75,deleting Criterion That Requires Expanding Sample If Measured Drag Force of Mechanical Snubbers Exceeds Previously Measured Drag Force by More than 50%
ML20247E484
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 07/20/1989
From: Butler W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20247E486 List:
References
NUDOCS 8907260197
Download: ML20247E484 (4)


Text

_______._

[%g "%q kj UNITED STATES g

NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COINMISSION c.:

7.

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%...../

i PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET N0. 50-311 SALEM GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 75 License No. DPR-75 1.

The Nuclear-Regulatory Comission (the Comission or the NRC) has found that:

A.-

The application for amendment filed by the Public Service Electric &

Gas Company, Philadelphia Electric Company,- Delmarva Power and Light Company and Atlantic City Electric Company (the licensees) dated May 5, 1989 complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Comission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Comission; C.

There is reasonable assurance: (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; D.

The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements have be n satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifica-tions as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-75 is hereby amended to read as follows:

j J

8907260197 s9o72o DR

.p ADOCK 0500o33j i

Poc J

1

. 4 (2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 75, are hereby incorporated in the

. license.

The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3.

This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance tn be implemented within 45 days of the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION N o A 7c? B t L Walter R. Butler, Director Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

July 20, 1989 i

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 75' FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-75 00CKET NO.-50-311 Revise Appendix A as follows:

Remove Page Insert Page 3/4 7-25 3/4 7-25 l

\\

3 I

PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

In addition to the regular sample, snubbers which failed the previous functional test shal_ be retested during the next test period. If a spare snubber has been installed in place of a failed snubber, then both the failed snubber (if it is repaired and installed in another position) and the spare snubber shall be retested. Test results of these snubbers may not be included for the

.re-sampling.

If any snubber selected for functional testing either fails to lockup or fails to move, i.e.

frozen in place, the cause will be evaluated and if caused by manufacturer or design. deficiency all' snubbers of the same design subject to the same defect shall be functionally tested. This testing requirement shall be independent of the requirements stated above for snubbers not meeting the i

functional test acceptance criteria.

For the snubber (s) found inoperable, an engineering evaluation shall be performed on the components which are supported by the snubber (s). The purpose of this engineering evaluation shall be to determine if the components supported by the snubber (s) were adversely affected by the inoperability of the snubber (s) in order to ensure that the supported component remains capable of meeting the designed service.

d.

Hydraulic Snubbers Functional Test Acrept.ance Criteria The hydraulic snubber functional tesc shall verify that:

1.

Activation (restraining action) is achieved within the specified range of velocity or acceleration in both tension and compression.

2.

Snubber bleed, or release rate, where required, is within the specified range in compression or tension. For snubbers specifically required to not displace under continuous load, the ability of the snubber to withstand load without displacement shall be verified.

Mechanical Snubbers Fyne,tional Accep,tance Criteria l

e.

the mechanical snubber functional test shall verify that:

1.

The force that initiates free movement of the snubber rod in either tensicn or compression is less than the specified maximum drag force.

2.

Activation (restraining action) is achieved within the specified range of velocity or acceleration in both tension and compression.

SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 7-25 Amendment No. 75

.)