ML20247D979

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 15000038/98-01 on 980309.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Safety Activities
ML20247D979
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/30/1998
From: Costello F, Reber E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247D966 List:
References
15000038-98-01, 15000038-98-1, NUDOCS 9805180166
Download: ML20247D979 (7)


See also: IR 015000038/1998001

Text

_

, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _

'

.. ,

i

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I '

Docket No.: 150-00038 '

1

RI License No.: 3D-065-01 )

!

Report No.: 98-001

l

Licensee: Thielsch Engineering, Inc.

'

Facility: Bridgeport Resco

Location: Bridgeport, Connecticut

Date: March 9,1998

Inspector

Eric H. Reber

~

-  %

'

date /

)0

/

[ I

Health Physicist

l

Approved by: fa A

F ncis M. Costello, Chief

b 3d /#9

[/ date

clear Material; Safety Branch 3

l

<

"

REG 10ill

9805180166 980403

PDR STPRQ ESQRI

PDR

- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

___ __ - - _ _ _ - - - - - --

e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thielsch Engineering, Inc.

NRC Inspection Report 150-00038/98-001

An announced inspection, limited to a review of radiographic operations performed by

Thielsch Engineering, Inc. on February 27,1998 at Bridgeport Resco was conducted on

March 9,1998. Two apparent violations for 1.) failure to keep unauthorized individuals

out of the restricsed area; and 2.) failure to file NRC Form-241, " Report of Proposed

Activities in Non-Agreement States," prior to engaging in activities in a Non-Agreement

State were identified.

-2- 150-00038/98-001

___

_

REPORT DETAILS

1. Background

RI License No. 3D-065-01 authorizes Thielsch Engineering, Inc. (licensee), in part, to

perform radiography at temporary jobsites in the State of Rhode Island. On February

27,1998, the licensee used an Amersham Model 660B radiography camera (S/N B2301) l

with a 27.6 Ciiridium-192 source to perform radiography at Bridgeport Resco, a co-

generation facility, in Bridgeport, Connecticut.' The licensee's radiographer and

engineering assistant were at the site performing radiography. During a three minute  ;

'

exposure, an unauthorized Resco employee was inside the restricted area.

On February 28,1998, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection

(CTDEP) was conducting an inspection regarding an unrelated matter at Bridgeport

Resco when they were informed of the incident. On March 2,1998, the CTDEP

informed NRC Region I that the licensee had performed radiography at Bridgeport

Resco, and that an unauthorized individual was inside the restricted area when the

radiography source was exposed. On March 9,1998, two Region I inspectors reviewed

the incident.

II. Control of Restricted Area

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's control of the restricted area established ren

February 27,1998 at Bridgeport Resco for compliance with NRC requirements.

b. Obsen/ations and Findinas

On February 27,1998, Thielsch performed radiography on the attemperator above the

superheater penthouse on the 9* level of Boiler #3 at Bridgeport Resco. The 9" level

is the uppermost level of the facility. Thielsch planned to establish a restricted area on

the 7",8* and 9" levels of the facility. Two stairways lead to the 9* level. The

radiographer, engineering assistant, and a Resco employee cleared the 9* level,

including the superheater pmthouse, of personnel. The Resco employee and the  ;

licensee's engineering assistant then cleared the 8* level, and then the 7*. As they

'

proceeded, they placed yellow and magenta ropes and restricted area caution signs at

elevator openings on the 9*,8*, and 7* levels. Ropes and signs were also placed

across the stairways at the 6* level. Approximately 45 minutes passed after the

restricted area was established. Prior to exposing the 27.E Ci iridium-192 source, an

announcement that radiography was to be performed was made over the facility's

public address system. After the restricted area was established, a Bridgeport Resco

,

'

employee, without the knowledge of the Thielsch radiographer, entered the

superheater penthouse on the 9" level, an area below where the source would be

exposed. While the source was expose 1, the Bridgeport Resco employee exited the

superheater penthouse through the access hatch and was seen by the radiographer.

The source was retracted immediately.

-3- 150-00038/98-001

.

,

.

c. Conclusions

Thielsch is required by their license to " Confirm that no unauthorized personnel are

within boundaries of restricted area" during and after radiographic exposures and this

did not happen. The licensee's procedures also require that "No unauthorized

personnel shall be allowed within the restricted area."

!

Condition 19 of RI License No. 3D-065-01 requires that licensed material be

possessed and used in accordance with statements, representations and procedures

contained in Radiation Safety Manual NDT-41, Revision 15.  !

l

'

Item 7.2 of this manual requires that "No unauthorized personnel shall be allowed ,

I within the restricted area." ltem 7.5 of this manual requires that licensee personnel will i

confirm that no unauthorized personnel are within the boundaries of the restricted area

during and after radiographic exposures.

l The finding that, on February 27,1998, unauthorized personnel were allowed within

! the restricted area and licensee personnel did not confirm that no unauthorized

I personnel were within the boundaries of the restricted area during and after

radiographic exposures is an apparent violation of Condition 19 of RI License No.

3D-065-01.

Ill. Dose Estimate

1

a. Inspection Scooe

The inspectors reviewed the dose estimate performed by the licensee for the Resco

employee that was present in the restricted area when the radiography source was

exposed. ,

b. Observations and Findinas

Later in the day on February 27,1998, the radiographer arranged the 27.6 Cl l

Iridium-192 source as it had been when the Resco_ employee was exposed and i

measured dose rates where the employee had been during the exposure. The

' measured dose rates were as follows:

Access Hatch <2 mR/hr

l Resco Employee work area <0.5 mR/hr

l

'

Employee's path of travel

from work area to Access Hatch 1 mR/hr

Exposure directly under source 4 mR/hr

All dose rates appear reasonable considering source strength, distance and the fact

that a 8.3 hajivalue layer collimator was used with the beam pointed away from

-4- 150-00038/98-001

. ______ _ ____- _ __ _ _ _ - _ __ -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

l ;' .

?

!

I

'

where the Resco employee was working. These measurements could not be

repeated during the inspection because the boiler was in operation.

The source had been exposed for 2.5 minutes when the Resco employee was

discovered. The Resco employee spent approximate!y 1 minute at the work area

and 1.5 minutes traveling from his work area to the access hatch. The licensee

estimated a total dose of 0.005 millirem for the Resco employee. This estimate

,

appears to be conservative, and, at the very least, the dose estimate would not

approach the dose limit for members of the public (100 mR/yr).

c. Conclusions

The licensee's dose estimate is conservative. Dose limits for individual members of

the public were not exceeded.

IV. Training

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the training of the radiographer for compliance with NRC

requirements.

! b. Observations and Findies

The radiographer involved received 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of radiation safety training and 80

hours of radiography training when working for a previous employer. He had 120

hours of classroom radiography training with another previous employer. The

radiographer also received training regarding equipment and procedures specific to

the licensee. He was tested by the licensee and received a composite score of

92.55%. The written portion of the exam included general radiation safety questions

as well as questions specific to radiography. The radiographer was also required to

demonstrate the proper use of radiography equipment. He received annual

retraining on January 2,1998 and passed an examination with a score of 96%.

The radiographer stated that he has always been instructed to keep people out of

the restricted area.

c, Conclusions

The radiographer involved in this incident was trained in accordance with NRC

requirements.

1

IV. Reciprocity

a. Inspection Scooe

l

-5- 150-00038/98-001 ,

I

i-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ . - - - . - _ - - - _ _ - - - - _ - - - -

j

. , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _

, ,

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's authorization to perform radiography on

February 27,1998 at Bridgeport Resco in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

b. Observations and Findinas

l

On February 27,1998, Thielsch performed radiography at Bridgeport Resco with a

27.6 curie iridium-192 source, but did not file an NRC Form-241, " Report of Proposed

Activities in Non-Agreement States," prior to commencing work. The Thielsch

employee responsible for filing such forms stated that he believed Connecticut was an

agreement state and therefore, did not require a Form-241 to be filed. The licensee I,

filed an NRC Form-241 on March 4,1998 after being informed that the form was

recuired.

c. Conclusions

10 CFR 30.3 requires in relevant part, that no person shall possess or use byproduct

material except as authorized by a specific or general license issued by the NRC.

10 CFR 150.20(a) provides, in part, that any person who holds a specific license frem

an Agreement State is granted an NRC general license to conduct the same activity in

non-Agreement States subject to the provisions of 10 CFR 150.20(b).

10 CFR 150.20(b)(1) requires, in part, that any person engaging in activities in non-

Agreement States shall, at least 3 days before engaging in each such activity, file 4  ;

copies of NRC Form-241," Report of Proposed Activities in Non-Agreement States", 1

with the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office.

The finding that, on February 27,1998, Thielsch Engineering, Inc., a licensee of

Rhode Island, used 27.6 Ci of iridium-192 in Bridgeport, Connecticut, a non-Agreement

State, without a specific license issued by the NRC and without filing Form-241 with

the NRC is an apparent violation.

VI. Management Meetings

Preliminary results of the surveys were discussed with Bruce MacLure, the licensee's

Laboratory Supervisor at the conclusion of the inspection.

<

-6- 150-00038/98-001

___ ________- -___- ____

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

'

.

4

l

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Licensee

Bruce MacLure, Laboratory Services Supervisor, Thielsch

! Stephan Goodyear, Radiographer, Thielsch

Bob Duhamer, Radiographer, Thielsch

l

Bridaeport Resco

Tom Maillet, Operations Manager, Resco

Robert Cushing, Control Room Operator, Resco

State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection

Mike Firsick, Radiation Control Physicist

l

l

l

1

i  !

l  !

l

i

!

l

l l

l \

l

,

-7- 150-00038/98-001 l

1

l

i

!