ML20246N005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion to Admit Reply to Applicant & Staff Responses to Intervenors Motion to Admit Contention or in Alternative to Reopen Record & Request for Hearing.* Due to Issues Being New & Not Previously Addressed,Responses Should Be Admitted
ML20246N005
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/1989
From: Brock M
MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20246N008 List:
References
CON-#389-9132 OL, NUDOCS 8909080016
Download: ML20246N005 (2)


Text

- - -

(( ' ' '

g e

~

s j

< pliil v%

j p

~

l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA L

gy -5 P3 32 i

t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t

1 hjk.[

o-ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

)

Before the Administrative Judges:

l l

l l

Ivan W.

Smith, Chairman Dr. Richard F.

Cole Kenneth'A. McCollom i

L l

1

)'

In the Matter of.

-)

Docket Nos. 50-443-OL

)

50-444-OL OF.NEW HAMPSHIRE, EI AL.

)

l PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY

)

(Off-Site EP) l

)

ll (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)

)

September 1, 1989

)

'l MOTION TO.ADMTT REPLY TO APPLICANTS' AND STAFF'S RESPONSES l

TO INTERVENERS' MOTION TO ADMIT CONTENTION OR IN THE l

ALTERNATIVE TO REOPEN THE RECORD AHD REQUEST FOR HEARING l

l l

i.

l Now comes Mass AG, SAPL, and NECNP (hereinafter

" Interveners"), and move this Board to accept and admit.the Il reply, filed herewith, to the responses of the Staff and l

l Applicants to INTERVENERS' MOTION TO ADMIT CONTENTION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO REOPEN THE RECORD AND REQUEST FOR HEARING, dated

)

July 21, 1989.

(" Motion").

In support hereof, Interveners j

i L

state:

l 1.

The Motion, with incorporated Contention, raises t-significant issues as to Applicants' incompetence to conform to i

89090B0016 h0.) 443 PDR ADOCK PDR pf7

m

'[

if

procedures, regulatory requirements, and industry standards'for l-safe management and operation; l-

' ;2.

In this proceeding, Interveners'have traditionally

'been' afforded the' opportunity to reply to Applicants' and L

Staff's responses to' contentions; 3.

Both Applicants and' Staff have raised new issues not-addressed in the July.21 Motion, including that this Board-should make new. law by. extending the " fundamental flaw" standard for exercise contentions to Interveners' contention that concerns defects in Applicants'~ low power operations; i

4.

The' Reply will assist the Board by providing a more l'

complete record for decison; 5.

The Staff response, following= Applicants', was not received by Mass AG until August 22.

This reply therefore has been filed as promptly as reasonably possible.

Respectfully submitted, JAMES M.

SHANNON ATTORNEY GENERAL I

)1\\,3 N4 s

ML t

~

katthew T.

Brock

~

Assistant Attorney General Nuclear Safety Unit One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2200..

l l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _