ML20246G939

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises of No Comments Re Review of Proposed Regulations, Administrative Code 64-5 Sent on 980212.Regulations Reviewed by Comparison to Equivalent NRC Regulations in 10CFR19,20, 30,34,35 & 61
ML20246G939
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/12/1998
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Passetti W
FLORIDA, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20246G946 List:
References
SP-96-027, SP-96-27, NUDOCS 9803250102
Download: ML20246G939 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _. _______ - _

~_o MAR 12 94 Mr. William A. Passetti Chief, Bureau of Radiological Control Florida Department of Health 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700

Dear Mr. Passetti:

As requested, we have reviewed the proposed regulations, Administrative Code,64-5, sent to us in a letter dated February 12,1998. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 19,20,30,34,35 and 61.

As a result of our review, we have no comments. Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulation.

However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted without significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Internal Procedure B.7.

We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" regulations be provided to us for review. As requested in All Agreement States Letter SP-96-027, *Reauest to Hiahliaht Chanaes to Aareement State Regulations Submitted to NRC for Compatibility Review" (March 1,1996), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.

If you have any questions regarding the comments, the compatibility and health and safety categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact me or Dr. Stephen

't N. Salomon at (301) 415-2326 or by INTERNET: SNS@NRC. GOV.

L, g,

t, 3 Sincerely, F;

OriginalSigned By:

1i PAULH.LOHAUS O

Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director I

Office of State Programs 1

0 C 1 a._ ;

L k

Distribution:

k DIR RF(8S-51)

RBlanton SSalomon DCD (SP06)

' SDroggitis LBolling KHsueh PDR (YES_f_, NO

)

g RWoodruff, Ril Kschneider, ASPO BUsilton l

Florida File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SNS\\ FLORIDA.S Tt receive a cop r of thle document, Indicate in the box: "C" = (g ut attachment / enclosure "E" = Cop r with attachment /enciqsure "N" = No copy OFFIC5 OSPFID OS%l OGC OSfg l

l NAME SNSalomon:kk PHLohj us FXCameron RLBanFad' DATE

,,02pS8T SE/98 03/10/98 03/ M /98 9903250102 980312

~

OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-6 PDR STPRG ESGF L

4 9

Mr. William A. Passetti Chief, Bureau of Radiological Control l

Florida Department of Health l

1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700

Dear Mr. Passetti:

As requested, we have reviewed the proposed regulations, Administr ive Code,64-5, sent to us in a letter dated February 12,1998. The regulations were rev' by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 19,20,30,34,35 a

$1.

As a result of our review, we have no comments. Please note tt)at we have limited our review to

. regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. ynder our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and hea.lth and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a re%w of the final State regulation.

However, we have determined that if your proposed regulapns were adopted without significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and afety categories established in OSP Internal Procedure B.7.

We request that when the proposed reguistions are a pted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" regulations be provided }6 us for review. As requested in All Agreement States Letter SP-96-027, "Recuest to Hichlicht Chances to Aareement State Regulations Submitted to NRC for Compatibility Review" (March 1,1996), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.

If you have any questions regarding the comme /

nts, the compatibility and health and safety categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact me or Dr. Stephen N. Salomon at (301) 415-2326 or by INTERNET: SNS@NRC. GOV.

Sincerely,

/

/

Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director

/

Office of State Programs I

l i

l

/'

. Distribution:

/

DlR RF(8S-51)

RBlanton SSalomon DCD (SP06)

SDroggitis LBollitig KHsueh PDR (YES_f._ NO

)

RWoodruff, Ril Ksch'neider, ASPO BUsilton Florida File

' @[ ettechment/

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SNS\\ FLORIDA.S

. Tm receive e cop ' of his document, Indicate in me bou: "C" s a Copy we ettechmenuenclosure

'W' = No copy OFFICE OSP $TD l' OSM $l (k3Cl _J OSP:D l

l NAME SNSalomon:kk / -

PHLohllus FXCameron RLBangart DATE 02@98 /

W/98 03//J98 03/

/98

./

OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-6

oRsE gk UNITED STATES 3

=

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20066 0001 49.....,o March 12, 1998 l

Mr. William A. Passetti, Chief Bureau of Radiological Control Florida Department of Health 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700

Dear Mr. Passetti:

As requested, we have reviewed the proposed regulations, Administrative Code,64-5, sent to us in a letter dated February 12,1998. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 19,20,30,34,35 and 61.

As a result of our review, we have no comments. Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulation.

However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted without significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Intemal Procedure B.7.

We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" tabulations be provided to us for review. As requested in All Agreement States Letter SP-96-027, "Recuest to Hiahliaht Chanaes to Aareement State Regulations Submitted to NRC for Compatibility Review" (March 1,1996), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.

If you have any questions regarding the comments, the compatibility and health and safety categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact me or Dr. Stephen N. Salomon at (301) 415-2326 or by INTERNET: SNS@NRC. GOV.

Sin rely, f

W! %

Paul H. Lohaus, De Dir ctor Office of State Programs

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _