ML20246G015

Supplemental Joint Affidavit of Gc Minor & Sc Sholly Re Events of 890622 During Low Power Testing at Seabrook Unit 1.* Concludes That Multiple Violations of 10CFR50,App B Identified.Related Info Encl.W/Certificate of Svc

ML20246G015
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	08/28/1989
From:	George Minor, Sholly S MHB TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES
To:
Shared Package
ML20246F967	List: ML20246F965 ML20246G015
References
OL, NUDOCS 8908310199
Download: ML20246G015 (31)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_;__-_ L 08/28/89 13:54 C408 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL ~~~ MASSACHUSETTS AC @ 002 l: l f 28 August 1989 I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7 BEFORE THE COMMISSION in the matter of PGLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. 50-444-OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) (I.aw Power Operation) SUPPLEMENTALJOINT AFFIDAVIT OF GREGORY C. MINOR AND STEVEN C. SHOLLY REGARDING THE EVENTS OF 22 JUhT> 1.989 DURING IAW POWER TESTING AT SEABROOK UNIT 1 I, Gregory C. Minor, do make oath and say: 1. My name is Gregory C. Minor. I am a Vice President of MHB Technica! Associates. My business address is 1723 Hamilton Avenue, Suite K. San Jose, California 95125. I received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1960 and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University in 1966. 2. I have over twenty-5ve years of experience in the design, development, research, start-up testing, and management of nuclear reactor systems. From 1960-1976, I worked for General Electric Company in the design, development, and testing of safety and control systems for nuclear plants. As part of these activities, I was responsible for system check out and preparation of pre-operational test procedures for a nuclear research reactor. My responsibilities j? 890832o199 89082e PDR ADDCK 05000443 G PDR

08/28/89 13:55 C408 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC 2 003 l 1 included equipment and systems design, as well as management of a large engineering group l responsible for new control room design. These new designs required the detailed evaluation of the technical and ergonometric factors necessary to ensure that operations data presented to operators would provide them with the information necessary to make the proper decisions for safe operation. 3. For the past thirteen years, I have been a independent technical consultant. In that capacity, I have participated in a variety of studies addressing nuclear facility economic, management, and safety issues for various organizations, including the Department of Energy /Sandia National Laboratories, the Swed'sh Government, and the of5ces cf several states' Attorneys General. I am currently a consultant on several nuclear plant cases in which design, management, and compliance with existing regulations are being investigated. 4 I am a member of the Nuclear Power Plant Standards Cormnittee for the Instrument Society of America. Also, I participated in a Peer Review Group of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Three Mile Island Special Inquiry Group. Further details of my qualifications and professional experience are summarized in my S;pement of Professionni OunHGeations, which is appended to this affidavit as Attachment I. I, Steven C. Sholly, do make oath and say: 5. My name is Steven C. Sholly. Since September 1985, I have been employed as an Associate Consultant by MHB Technical Associates,1723 Hamilton Avenue, Suite K. San Jose, California 95125. I have previously been employed by the Union of Concerned Scientists as a Technical Research Associate and Risk Analyst from February 1981 to September 1985, and by the Tnree Mile Island Public Interest Resource Center as a Research Coordinator and Project Director from January 1980 to January 1981. I alou have non-nuclear experience in the 2-

08/28.'89 '13:56' C408'266 7149. MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC @ 004 's.I wastewater treatment and science education fields from September 1975 to January 1980. I received ~a B.S. in Education, with a major in Earth and Space Science and a minor in Environmental Education, from Shippensburg State College (now Shippensburg University), Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, in 1975. 6. For the last nine and a half years,11: ave been engaged in analyzing technical e nuclear safety, management, design, construction, and regulatory issuet,, and providing technical advice to state and local governments (including the States of California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Maine, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, and Suffolk County, New York) and independent organhations on these issues. I have presented expert testimony concerning these issues in a number of state jurisdictions, as well as before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in the Indian Point Special Investigation and the Catawba operating license review. I have also presented expert testimony before the United States Congress and before the SizewellInquiry (United Kingdom). I have previously served as principal investigator for monitoring of startup testing and low power operations for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station for the New York Consumer Protection Board. Further details of my experience and qualifications are contained in my St=tement of Profeninnal Ounlifications. which is appended to this affidavit as Attachment 2. DISCUSSION 7. On 21 July 1989, we transmitted an affidavit to the Office of the Attorney General, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which was subsequently filed on that date as Attachment A to " Interveners' Motion to Admit Contention, or, in the Alternative, to Reopen the Record, and Request for Hearing". That affidavit set fonh our understanding of the events of 22 June 1999 based. on information available as of that date. In that affidavit, we concluded that the failure of the operators to manually trip the reactor when the 17% pressurizer level criterion was reached violated 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V. ~3-

'08/28/89- -23:56 G408.2667149 MHB TECHN1 CAL ~~~ MASSACHUSETTS'AC 2005 8. On 22 August 1989, we received a copy of the NRC staffs " Augmented Inspection Team"(AIT) report on the events of 22 June 1989 (NRC Inspection Report 50-443/8992). Our review of this AIT inspection report indicates that the r eport provides significant new information concerning the events of 22 June 1989. Accordingly, herein we supplement out 21 July 1989 affidavit. Below, based on the staffs AIT report, we identify several additional vioistions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, which occurred during and prior to the Natural Circulation Test conducted at Seabrook Unit 1 on 22 June 1939. 9. The AIT inspection report indicates that a prerequisite for the Natural Circulation Test (1-ST-22) was not met in that while the test procedure required the plant staff to confirm the availability of the steam dump system prior to initiating the test, in fact there was an open work order (WR87 WOO 5592) for post maintenance stroke testing of steam dump valve MS-PV-3011 (the valve which failed open during the event). Significantly, the AIT inspection report states for the first time that this stroke test had no1 been performed and the work order had not been closed out, and that the Natural Circulation Test prerequisite (prerequisite 3.6.7) was " signed of' -- indicating that the stroke test had been performed when in fact it had un1 been performed. [Sg, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 14 and Enclosure 2] (Note that this is in contrast with the applicants' evaluation with states that the prerequisite was "sutisfied"; sec, Enclosure 4 to NYN-89086, 30.) Accordingly, the Natural Circulation Test should not have taken place until the test prerequisites were met. Instead, the natural circulation test was conducted and the failure of MS-PV 3011 during the performance of the test initiated the transient which occurred during the conduct of the test. This represents a violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI (which specifically requires that test procedures include provisions for assuring that all prerequisites for a test have been met), and Criterion V (which specifically requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings appropriate to the circumstances 4

08/28/89 13I57 G 408 266'7149 MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC @ 006 and that the activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings). - 10. Post event investigation revealed that MS PV 3011 failed to operate properly due to mechanical binding. For the first time, the AIT inspection repkt states that there was also binding found in valve MS-PV-3019, reather steam dump valve, and that post-event testing of all steam dump valves showed binding, scored stems, h,ose linkage, or tight linkage in seven of the tselve steam dump valves. The AIT teport concluded, "in general, the history of steam dump valve system work orders indicates that there is a valve maintenance or design problem." (See, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 14] This is a violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, which requires that significant conditions adverse to quality be identified and corrected, and that the cause of the condition be determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. The adverse performance history of the steam dump valves represents, in our opinion, a "s/gnificant condition adverse to quality" in general due to the safety function performed by the steam dump valves (,tec, ParaBraph 11, ig(zg), and specifically for the Natural Circulation Test due to its reliance on adequate performance by the steam dump valves. 11. The steam dump valves perform a safety function in that the steam dump valves are part of the steam dump control system which is designed to accept a 50 percent loss of net load without tripping the reactor. [Sce, Seabrook FSAR, Section 7.7.1.8) This system performs an important safety function in that it reduces the rate of challenges to the reactor protection system and other systems which might be called upon to respond following a reactor trip. Thus, the staff's conclusion that there is a " valve maintenance or design problem" with the steam dump valves is safety significant for full power operation. It is also safety significant for the Natural Circulation Test which depends on the steam dump valves for proper operadon in order to carry out the test (hence the test prerequisite requiring the operability of the steam dump valves). Accordingly, the question of whether there is a valve maintenance or design problem with the steam dump valves, 5-

08/28/89 13:58 G40S 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC @ 007 and implementation of appropriate corrective actions, must be resolved before resumin operation. 12. The NRC staff's AIT report provides the first clear Indication that the specific training provided to the operators on the Natural Circulation Test was inadequate in several respects. (This is entirely aparable from the question of whether the operators were adequ trained in the necessi+y for procedural adherence, which they clearly were not.) Specifica AIT report indicates that the operators v.ere last trained on the Seabrook simulator on the Natural Circulation Test on April /May 1986 -- approximately three and a nalf years ago (an notwithstanding an NRC staff recommendation conceming the need for additional simulator training before conducting start-up tests; tre, NRC Inspection Report 8815, at 8). The staff also noted that classroom training was provioed in September / October 1988 as part of the licensed i operator requalification program, however the entim startup testing program was covered in a four-hour course. [Sce, AITInspection Report 89-82, at 17] It is worth noting that there are sorne 50 startup tests described in Chapter 14 of the Seabrook FSAR: this works out to an average o about 5 minutes instruction per startup test for the cited four-hour requalification training lecture This cannot be concluded to have been an adequate " refresher" training on the Natural Circulation Test, particularly considering that it took place nearly a year before the Natural Circulation Test was actually conducted. Moreover, as the AIT report noted, the fact that the natural circulation test simulator training had been performed three years before the test was to be carried out, the fact that the classroom requalification training was almost a year old at the time the test was to be carried out, and the fact that the operators on shift on the morning of the event had not routinely worked together as a crew should have provided added incentive to ensure that the operators received some refresber training and a thorough briefing prior to commencing the test. [Sec, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 21] E - -- _ --_ -

08/28/89 13:58 C408 266 7149 MHD TECHNICAL ~~~ MASSACHUSETTS AG @ 008 { l l 13. The NRC staff's AIT inspection report indicates for the first time that the pre test briefing provided to the shift crew was inadequate. Specifically, the staff noted that the j Operations Management Manual for Seabrook requires that briefings on plant evolutions { involving many individuals or involving complex evolutions should be performed as a crew, not on an individual basis. This was not done. Moreover, the AIT report notes that one of the Control i Room Operators and the Shift Supervisor were never even briefed individually on the test. (Sec, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 18) These circumstances represent a violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, which requires that the quality assurance program provide for indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained. 14. The AIT report provides further support for our conclusion that the operators deliberately disregarded the test criterion for manually tripping the reactor. The AIT report points out that the operators were trained that procedural adherence is required with deviations allowed only after procedure changes have been made or in the case of the emergency response procedures by invoking 10 CFR 50.54(x). Training Department personnel told the AITinspectors that the operators are trained to comply with all approved station procedures, regardless of I whether they are operations procedures, administrative procedures, or test procedures. They l further told the AIT inspectors that the control room operators are instructed to advise the Unit Shift Supervisor when and if the reactor trip criteria are approached and/or exceeded, and to trip the reactor unless directed otherwise by the Unit Shift Supervisor. (Ice, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 17-18} Since the USS did not direct the operators not to trip the reactor, the Control l Room Operators should have proceeded to manually trip the reactor in compliance with the test 'l procedure and their training. The NRC's regulations, the plant Technical Specifications, the plant procedures, and the operators' training all mandate procedural compliance. Moreover, the I operators knew and informed the Unit Shift Supervisor that the manual trip criterion was being approached and subsequently was exceeded, and certain personnel were also informed of this by f _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _

08/28/89' 13:59 G408 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC @ 009 l NRC personnel present in the control room during the Natural Circulation Test. When the reactor was finally tripped, it was apparently for an entirely different reason than the fact that the 17% pressurizer level manual trip criterion had been exceeded. The AIT report states, "The operating crew did not comply with an explicit procedural requirement to manually trip the reactor even though they were fully aware that the established trip criterion had been exceeded. The CROs i shouH have recommended to the USS that the reactor be inpped before level exceeded the 17% pressurizer level criterion." [See, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 21] We continue to view this failure to adhere to procedurcs as safety significant. 1 15. The AIT report indicates for the first time that an operator who was designated as the STA performed the' EOP control board manipulations during recovery from the transient. [Sss, AIT Inspection Report 89 82, at 20 and 21] This is inconsistent with the significant role played by an STA. The AIT report noted, "If the EOP recovery had been extended, the inspectors were uncertain whether this operator would have beenfree toperform his STA responsibilities." [Sec, AITInspection Report 89-82, at 20] 16. The staff AIT report also concludes, for the first time, that the Shift Supervisor's level of awareness, knowledge, and involvement in the shift evolution durmg the test "*cs not commensurate with the significance and complexity of this test" The AIT report consinues, "Thefact that the natural circulation test is one of thefirst evolutionsperformed with a criticalreactor and the fact that the test involves abnormal operating conditions should have been sufficient to raise the SS's levelofawareness and involvement." [R, at 21-22) In addition, the AITinspection report indicates that Shift Supervisor had not been briefed on the conduct of the Natural Circulation Test, and did not have a copy of the test procedure available to him during the test. [E,at18] These l circumstances violate 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, in that the Shift Supervisor was not l sufficiently informed to exercise the quality functions of promptly identifying and correcting i conditions adverse to quality during the conduct of the Natural Circulation Test (by assuming 8

~. 08/28/89' 14iOO C 408 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL ~~~ MASSACHUSETTS AG @ 010 command of the control room and/or ordering the shutdown of the reactor), and in that the Shift Technical Advisor was not available to perform the independent quality function of evaluating operations and providing advice to the shift crew. 17. The failures in performance of personnel, as demonstrated during and prior to the events of 22 June 1989, are safety significant. Our view is consistent with the AIT report which concluded that the following aspects of the performance of licensee personnel were "suferv significant": the failure of the operating crew to trip the reactor when required by the test procedure; the failure of test group perwnnel to recommend tripping the reactor; the failure of management present in the control room to exercise their responsibilities despite the fact that the p: ant was being operated under a Technical Specification Special Test Exempticn; and the " apparent willingness" of management to proceed with testing following the 22 June 1989 event without first completing a thorough review and causal factor assessment. In addition, the staff concluded that the operational practice exhibited by the personnel in the control room was " unacceptable". [Seg, AIT Inspection Report 89-82, at 29-30) 18. In conclusion, muldple violations of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, have been identified during the performance of the Natural Circulation Test and the time period leading up to the conduct of the test. l i 9-J

~'08/28/89 14iO1 - G408 266 7149 MHB TECHNICAL --- MASSACHUSETTS AC @ ell. AFFIRMATION Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 28th day of August 1989. yW Gregory C. Mino/ v Steven C. Sholly L 1 l l 10-e_,

l ATTACHMENT 1 Statement of Professional Qualifications Gregory C. Minor f. JUL 22 'G5 13:56 orw aam a - -- ~--

( PROFF"80NAL QUAT fFlfATfONS OF GB pr.ORY C MINOR GREGORY C.heNOR MMB Toshaled Associates 1723 Hamasas Assues Seks K San Jose, CaRfornia 95125 (408) 266 2716 EXEEEEtK3 in to Paasswr y;,..p. ' . Mme T- ' - ' -- t. h r#' o'n

• T

. 4 and energy consultant to state, federal, and private orgmairada== and ladividuals. Maior estivities include studies of safety and risk involved la caergy generation, provuhas 1 technical consaking to legislative, regulatory, public and penate groups and sapet wheems in behalf of state orgnaimations and citisess' groups. Was co editor of a aritigos of the Reactor Safety Stedy (WASH 1400) for ths Valon of Concerned Seestists and co author of a risk ) analysis of s.edish reemors for the swedish smery e = '= served on ths Peer Review Group of the NRC/DG Spenallageiry Group (Rogovia ca==h). Assively incohed la the Nesleer Power Finst Standards Comunktes work for the lastranset somety of America (IM). 1972 - 1976 u -- - - - +_w ' c-2 a t=_- -==. v= - -- s_ c=;,1 ns ce:_.,_ p.i..., e - _, g - c., g p ,-_3 Managed a design and development group of thirty four enginasts and suppost personnel designag systems for use in the measurement, control and operation of socieer reactors. lavahad coordia=ria= with other reamer design organiantions, the Nacisar Ragulatory e and memers, both o.oriens and da.- eir menia incinded coordinating and snanaging and design and i ',. eat of control sysians, safety systems, and now control comespts for use on the mest generation of roasters. The positica included " *'* y for standards appiscable to coetrol and instrumentation, as well as the design of short-term solutlass to Sold problems. De En ripliaar inwohed incinded aisetrical and me-chemical engineering, seisuuc design and process computer control /programmas, and equipament qu.i.r 1970 1971 . - - cr_e _ a s o . B- :--- G-al wn ee cannanv. Nort.. F= a Dhisina. AspJane.Caldormia Managed a group of seven engineers and two support personnelin the design and preparation of the detailed system drawings and control documents rehting to safety and emergency systems for nuclear reactors. Responsibility required coordination with other desaga 1 i f Jut z i e s i. : c': .:c g 23 3 7 3,3 3 y,;,g g, og;

~ 4 orgamientions and internation with the casamer's engineering persaans!, a weg as reg Peepumal. 1963 - 1910 . r. _ w _ _. _ _, c _ _ _ g,. .r--." sr - n-A ww e a u y

w. for the design of speedic control and instr== aearia= sysises for nuclear La.ad dange responsibdity for various sobeyness of lastrumentation used to renators.

messere asutrom Gus in dra reactor during startup and intermodiese power operation. Performed lead system design fumaion in the design of a maior system for measuring the power generated is anclear ressors. Other r_, - ^'W locluded on site c6schout and testies of a complete reactor control system at as capenmental reactor in the Southwest. Rossived potest for Nuclear Power Monitoring System. 1960 1963 ) g _ _ m, _ m _ _.__3 e __ g p% c,____.__ 3,______.,.,,,,o_ % CaEnraia. and Annona Relating assignments la a variety of disciplines. Eaginear, tsamor maintennaec and lastrument design, KE and D reactors, Hanford, Washington, ciremt design and equipment==i+===a coordantion. Desip engineer, Microneve Department, Palo Alto, Californie, Work on design of cavity coupiers for Microwave Traveling Wave Tubes (rWT). Design eagneer, Computer P,-^- - -^ Phoemis, Arizona. Design of core enving ciremtry. Design eagnost, Atonde Power Egalpment Depnetment, San Joas, Califerala. orcet 4.ega and anniyms. Design easianer, Spoos Systems Department, Santa Barbara, California. Prepared control portion of satellite proposal Techmeal Staff - Technical Military Flamaing Operation. (TEMPO), Santa Barbara, California. Picpare analyses of missile eschampas. l 1 During this period, completed three-year General Electric program of encasive education la advanced engineering principles of higher mathe=atics, probability nad analysis. Also commpleted couress in Kepser Tregoe, Effective Piseestation, Management Training Program, j and various teshaicalsom* mars. 1 1 b 2 i.

1 EDUCAT10N University of CaBfornia'at Berksley, BSEE,1960. Adsessed course in Engineering three year curricalma, General Einaric Company,1963 Standard University, MSEE,1966. - HONOR 4 AND 4tSOC2ATIONS Tau Beta Pi *f - -Q Honorary Society Co-holder of U.S. Patest No. 3,565 700,' Nuclear Reactor Power Monitoring System,' February,1971. Messber: Aanericas,AMa for the Advancement of Science. Mannber: Naclear Power Plant Standards c==ietee, Instrument haary c.f Anserica. runs icArinNR AND NTIMOg 1. G. C. Minor, S. E. Moore, ' Control Rod Signal Multiplexing,' IEEE Transamioas on Nuclear Saianas, Vol NS 19, February 1972. j 2.

• G. C. Minor, W. G. Milan, "An Inteysted ControlRoosi syntess for a Nacisar Power Plant,"

' NEDO 106Se, preemsted at laserssocaal Nuclear ladustries Fair and Technical Meetings, omober,1972, Basis, $wheerland. 3. h aboos article was also published la the German Technical Massaise, NT, March,1973. 4 Testanomy of G. C Minor, D. G.Bridumbaugh, and R. B. Hubbard before the Joint e"'- on Atomic EmerEr, Hearing held February 18,19%, and publinbod by the Union of Concerned % Cambrkies, M-%ena. 5. Testianomy of G. C Minor, D. G. Brkleabaugh, and R. B. Hubbard before the California State Assembly r=='utes on Resources, Land Use, and Eacrgy, March 8,19M. 6. Testianomy of G. C Minor and R. B. Hubbard before the Caufornia Stae Senate Comunittee on Public Utilities, Transit, and Emergy, March 23,1976. 7. Teethmany of G. C Minor regarding the Grafcatheinfeld Nuclear Flant, March16 17, 1977 Warteess, Gersnamy. 8. Testlanomy of G. C Minor before the Cluff Lake Board of laquiry, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, September 21,1977. 3-f. n u.33 :.: : ci ' .:cs IEE M 49 F ME. 004

m 9. N at E af. " - T-m - w A Rd_- d the Nac a -- -- itudv W A S M. 16 (NURBG.75/014). H. Kandall, et al, edited by O. C. Minor and R. 8. Habbard for the Union atCannarned te=atiefa Aegist,1971. g m u 'M

• M P ^

--^ M M B T m M g Janaery, IFIB. (Putdished by Swedah Deparement ofladastry as Dosammet Del 1FR1) 11. Testlanomy by O. C Minor before the Wmonesia Public Servios Commission. February 13,19 1 - af e= '- L = - - Tk-Ic.2- "1b and %m. i I

12. -

Testhmony by G. C Manor before the Cahfornia Lagislatus Assemblyem==='a= Renonreas, land Use, and Energy, AB 3108, AprE 26,1978, Sawamento, California. on 13. Prenestation by G. C. Mmor before the Federal Ministry for Rancarch and Tee.hoology (BMFT), Meeting on Reactor Safety Research, Sd--M " - r---w is n- ' -m August 21, and September 1,1975, Bona, Germany. 14. Testianomy of G. C. Minor, D. G. Brideabnegh, and R. F. Hubbard, before the Atostic Sadsty and IJeessing Board, September 25,1978, in the matter of Black Fox Nuclear Power Station Construction Perank Henrisp, Tulsa, r%Inha== 15. Tastimony of G. C. Minor ASIA Hearings Related to TMI.2 Accident, Rancho Seco Power Plant, on behalf of Friends of the Earth, tar **=h= 13,1979. 16. Testimesy of O. C. Minor before the Midnigan State tagislature, Spock' Joint en==le*= on Nuclear Emergy, t--8' of Three ""- ' '- ' P "-- far Naala-* Power P'==^: la 'j unhing, one ts,1979. 17. A Crie&*=8 View of M*-"==

• ' 7, by G. C. Minor, paper prescated to the Amberican A=aciadaa for the Advanomancet of Scianas, Symposium ca Nacicar Reactor safety, Jassary 7, 1900, San Presdnoo, CaElornia.

13, m m^ : at u an '='. af N=' - Poner ?- paper i.;M at Forset on Swedish Nuclear Retarendues, *r--i'-.-h Soeden, March 1,1900. 19, s,. __ __ _ y,_. _ _ p. __ c_ ____,_a_ __ %,m MHB Technical hen, W 1900, prepared for the Minassota Panuria= Control Assocy, RoseviGe, MN. 20. Testlancey of G. C. Manor and D. G. Bridenbaagh before the New York State Public Servke en..

n. th= ' Ne '= = "' a P=-

" * ^ ' ' la the matter of Long laland Lighting Company Tensporary Rate Canc, case iP 27D4 September 22,1980. Direct testlanomy of Done O. Brideabeugh and Gregory C. Minor bafore the New York State 21. PabEc Sardes ra==inata=, r s =, p , c2_ __ ='r ; Rd ; af e' - * -- Nn * -- PaaerStation Caqsg and Schadena. in the matter of Long laland laghting Cosapany Temporary Rate Case, Case Numsber 277/4, September 29,1980. 21. T- -d ""- FA crird-- . MHB Technical Associates, January,1981, prepared for and available from the Swedah Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, Swedea. 4 - [, a.

23. Tamimomy of G. C. Minor and D. G. BrWeebegh before the New Jersey Board of Putdie Udlities,0 _e-Crank igno n ^ " - rs== ' '= ^'= in tbs matter of the Pedtion of Jcrasy Central Power and light Company for approval of an increase in the rates for electr serviss and agostment clause and factor for such service, OAL Docaet No. FUC 351HO commt Nes. ap.als, arMas, February 19,19g1. 24 Testbassy of G. C Minor and D.G. Brideabeugh as FORV's and Premadaar Hansars Distdo Canyes Operadag IJeemas hearing before ASLB, la the mattar of Paulne Gas and Elearic Company (Diablo Campn Nucisar Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50 275 04 $0-3504 January 11,1982. 25. .Testimesy of G. C. Maar and R. B. Hubbard ca Emerammer Banpanna Flammina. Diablo G spm Operating IJoense hearing before ASLB, Docket Nos. 50 275 01,30 323 01, Ja M.1982. 26. E^ ^ T-^ =d -==A **- '- F="=e CMae P'-- It # - -;. MHB Technical Assodstas, PAwi 1982, prepared for and available freus the Swedah Nuclear Power Inspemorate, l Stoskholm, Sweden. 27. Testimony of G. C. Minor, R. B. Hubbard, M. W. Goldsudth, S. J. Haracod as behalf of 1 SaBak County, before the Atomic Safety and IJoensing Board, in the matter of Lang Inland lighting Company, Shoreham Nacinar Power Stasion, Unit 1, regarding ca===sian 73, & e=- a= a e -==a-Dodet No.30 322 OL April 13,19g2. 28. Testimony of G. C. Mmmor and D. G. F-1 4 on behalf of Suffot County, before the Atomic Safety and uoensing Board. in th m.eter oflang Island ughting Compesy, shareham Nuclear Poeur Station, Unit 1. regarding ~ ""

1. ~

~-- R F C =5 Yalurlallata, Docket so. 30322 01, April 13,19g2. 29. Testianomy of G. C. Minor and R. B. Hobberd on behnif of Sanok Commy, before the Atomic Safety and usensing Board, in the maner of tong 1.iaed ughting ca-p y, shoreham Nucinar Power Stados, Unit 1, recordag - - em e-M " soc c= = i post. 4mdant Manitoring. Docket No. S322 01, May 2$,19g2. 30. Testimony of G. C. Maar and D. G. Bridsabaugh om behalf of Sadok County, before the Atomic Safety and 13cansmag Board,la the maner of Lees Island ushtas Compesy, Shoreham Nucl6er Poemt Station, Unit 1, regarding t=8'4 r=='v c===~~= 2:L ERV Test 7 e- -- Docket No.5322 OI, May25,19g2. 3L Testimoey of G. C. Minor and D. G. Bridsabaugh ce behalf of Suffok Count *', before the Atomic Safety and lleensing Board, in the matter of Long Island Lighting Compauy, Sharakam Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, regardag 8 ' '= af SRV ro"-_- Docket No. $0 322 01, Jana 14,1982, 32. Teethmaar of G. C. Minor on behalf of Suffok County, before the Atonde Safety and IJcasaing Board,in the matter oflang Island ughting Compsey, Shorehaat Nudear Pcoer ttatta= Unit 1, regardig Baviramastal Omaldication. Docket No. 50 322 01, January 18,1983. 33. Testanooy of O. C. Minor and D. O. Bridenbaugh before the Pennsykamia Public Utility Commission, on behalf of the Office of Consmaer Advocatr, R**- *- the em of 1 5-1 Jut at es 24 c3 aos 2EE M49 W E.005

c__ g._ u _ c._ ,,m a,,;g = IJ$s, Duchet No. R-822189, March 18,1933. Unit L Re: Pennsyhenia Power and R Suppleansatal testimony of G. C. Minor, R. B. Hubbard, and M. W. Gatdamirk om behalf of sus 4 Causty, before the Atomic Safety and IJcensing Board, la the matter of laag Island % Caespany, S,horeham Nuclear Power Stados, Unit 1, regarding Sadaty plannification m_ ge,.. 75). Docket No.30 322, March 23,19g3. 35. Verbal testimony before the District Court Judge la the ease of Sierra Club et. at vs. DOE regenhas the Ocam up of Uranium MiB Tailings. Joas 20,1933. g m___ w...

p.., _ e....___.P

-1 M Tm hm June,19El, Prepared for and availabic trama the Swedish Nacisar Power laspeaorate, Stockholm, Sweden. 37. 4 E- '+ Pa - **-*= n = =: =a t w E " -'= MHB Technical ? -- ' ^ , June,1933, prepared for and available from the Swedish Noclear Power r - -- A Starkhak Swedea. 38. Testimony of G. C. Minor, P. C. Finlayson, and E. P. Radford before the Atomic Saisty and 11raaming Board, in the Matter of long Island IJohting Compuy, Shoreham Nuclear Poner Staden, Unit 1, regarding m 7- = P'-^' - E+=a r -- w r--- te--h as. 21_D and 2LM1 Docket No. S322-OL 3, Novensber 18,1983. 39. Testimacey of G. C. Minor, Sisswen T Power Station Public Inqt ry, Proof of Evidanne i Ramaniina taistv Immuns. Desember.1983. Tendanomy of D. G. Bridesbaugh,1 M. Danioison, R. B. Habbard and G. C Minor before the 40. State of New York Public Servks a ' ". PSC Case No. 27563, in the matter of Long l !aland IJghdag r%= pay Proceeding to 1-- the e af the " '-- Madang Gammenting FacDity - han IL as behalf of County of SuNok, February 10,1984 1 Testimony of Prod C. Finleynaa, Gregory C Minor aM Edward P. Radford before the Atomic 41. Salsty and 13an==iar Board, la the Master of Lang Island IJghsing Company, Shoreham Nuclear Power Stados, Unit 1, on behalf of Sufolk County Regarding e- - , pi- . e _ _ fComanadna 611 Docket No. 50 322 OL March 21,1934. 42. Testimony of G. Deamis Eloy, C John Smith, Grupory C Minor and Dale G. Brideabaugh before the Atende Safety and ljeamslag Board, la the naamar of Imag Island Lighnag company, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Uak 1, reparthag EMD Dianal Qepgratqrs and 20 MW Gag IngWag, Docket No. 30 3230L March 21,1984. 43. Revised Tusdmony of Gregory C Minor before the Atosaic Safety and Licensing Board, la the matter aflasg laland llighting Company, Shoreham Nuclear Poser $!stion Unit 1, ce behalf of sus 4 Osuusyregarding 8-- _ = P'-

• =.-.. " #

4 (r%'ar:aa as w nat Docket No.2 32241, July 30,1984. Teatimosy of Dr. Christian Meyer, Dr. Jose Roesset, and Gregory C. Minor before the Atomic 44 Safety and IJcensing Board, in the matter of Imag Island IJohting Company, Shoreham Nudcar Power Station Unit 1, on behalf of Suffolk County, regarding low Pw F=+= b CanthilPina of AC Power Snurema Docket No. 50-322 OL, Ju.'y 1984. 6-j f. JUL 21

• E n 14 : fa4

~

4 1 45. Surrebemal Testimony of Dale O. Bridsabaugh, Lyme M. Danielson, lushant 3. Habterd, and Oregory C Minor, Before the New York Suse Pubbe servise e-- ' ' = PSC Case No. 27565, Shareham Neclear Station.14mg Islead IJghting Company, as behalf of SeSolk County and New Yesk State Comesraer Prossaios Board, renardlag " "-- d the ea* at the Shanaham lBasimar Gemaratine Facility. October 4,1904. 4. Direst Testissomy of Dale O. Brissebaugh, Lynn M. Denisboa and Gregory C Minor as behalf of Masseshmastes Attorney Osmeral, DPU 84145, betur. the ww-.= t ; _ -- of PubEc Utiless, regarding &' -- of :-- hr M - '--- em au ex ' ?'_^ Camammy for Sambraak Un' i Novimmber 23,1984,84 pgs. d 47. Direct Testiesoay of Dale G. Brklembeagh, Lyma M. Danieleos and Gregory C Minor on behalf of Maine Public Utiuties ra===*ta= Staff regarding E' = af e== of ' " '- Unie 1 -l Docket No. 84113, December 21,1984. 46. Direct Testimsomy of Dels G. Bridenbeugh and Gregory C Minor os behalf of secolk County } ,% < __,_ _ ___ _, e- -i e 7 _ t,t Docket No. 50-322-OL, Jammary 25, 1985. 49. Dhess Testissesy of Dale G. Bridenbessh, Lynn M. Danielson, and Oregory C. Minor on behalf of the Verssout Department of Public Servies, PSB Desket No. 5030, regarding tradanad c _. v=-e - r_. = c_ "= c-* far ' ' l i November u,1985. 50. Snrrebuttal testimony of Gregory C. Minor or behalf of the Vermont P ;1 - -^ of PubEe Servios, PSB Docket No. 5030, Pr '-- af e== ! vr= - ? " - ?.:_* c__e = ca-ht.3ealEnoka December 13,1985. $L Direct Teatissomy of Dans O. Bridsebaugh, Oregory C Minor, Lyna K. Fries, and Steven C. l ShoDy on behalf of State of Commestiat E:;r- -" of Pubbe Utility Control Prosecutonal Dhesion and DMsion of Consumer Commsel repnhag the Prudenap of Espam&tarna na Mginana Unit 1 Docket No. 834743, February la,19e6. 52. Direct Testissesy of Dels O. Bridenbeugh and Gregory C. Minor os behalf of Massachusetts i Attorney Oeaeral regarding the W' - af S __ hr Naar W ' ' 7-- C2 far "^ SaalEDGLMaka Docket Nos. ER45446000, ER45 647000, February 21,1906. 53. Direct Testimesy of Oregory C Minor on behalf of the Prosecerorial Division of CDPUC resenhag e'2' ca====:a-W'- = for Mulsanna Unit 1 Docket No. ER45 72M01 March 19,1986. 54. Direct Testinsosy of Dale O. Bridenbeugh and Gregory C. Minor os behalf of Massachusetts Attorney Oomeral reganling WWPea e=-----h & '- - for ph Unit i Docket No. 85 210, Marek 19,1906, 55. Direct Tamissey of Dalc O. Bf'- ' ' ) and Oregory C. Minor ce behalf of Massachusetts Attorney Osmeral regenting WMWPa's P-=*cial C _c' rWas and r' ' ___' Pasetal Additionsm Millstame Upit 1 Docket No. 85 270, March 19,1986. 7 2 JUL 21 '59 14: 0 .208 265 7149 PME.005

56. Rebuttal Testboey of Dale G. Bdecabaugh and Gregory C Minor on behalf of u.a-,h..n, W General regarding Rh*J n New w a -J Poemr r=-- >>"- ' cd 1 Docka i Nos. ER45446@1, ER45447001, April 2,1996. 57 Direa Techmony of Dale G. L N and Gregory C. Minor on behalf of 5 tats of Matae Stst af Pubts UtEties Pa'==la iam regarding Csagr' "= ?. af "~ ~ = Unit 1 la the sumar of Maine Power Company Proposed Iscrease la Ames, Donket No. g5 212, AprS 21, 1986. se, r-- a- - g is, c =_ tj,_4 3_ ' =r for N=har S- - =.7 ' - far the tr-s, af mz Xgsk, prepared for the State of New York Coasmaer Protection Board, by MHB Techucal Associates, Jane 1906. 59. Direst Testinomy of Dale G. Bddenbeuch and Orspory C. Minor on behalf of the Vermont Departammt of Pubuc Service, regarding Pr=d-- of r~e tw r= 1 I V._ =t 7 "_: e m. '.= Corporation for Mllistane i Docket No. $132, Angest 25,1906. 40. Serrabattal Testianooy of Gregory C. Minor in the =.neer of Jersey Coatral Power and ught rampany, regardag TMI Rantant ard Parfarnianne Imamathms. (Oral testimony), OAL DockW No. PUC 193945, SPU Dockst No.13A51116, September 11,1906. 61. Serrobuttal Testissony of Gregory C Mher ce behalf of State af Vermont Departmaar of PubEc Servies, regarding CVP1/NU r= -- cb & '- # ' toumm Unir i Dogggg No.5132, November 6,1936. i 62. Direst Testimony of Oregory C. Minor and Lysa K. Price on behalf of State of Vermont t ;r t of Public Serwoe, regarding &'- 2 at w= " - es for ea=a t Docket No. $132, Desember 31,1906. 63. Dired Testimooy of Gregory C Maar on behalf of SuBolk Couary, before the Atonde Sedery sad Uconsing Board, concerning - ' ?. Ad= n - - - '" - - (r~' =^>s ELM), in the matter of Imag Isisad Lightag Company, Shoreham Nudear Power Statha, Unit 1 Dochst No.30-322 01,5, February 27,19g7. 64. Direct Taalma=y of Gregory C Minor et. al. on behalf of the State of New York and Suffolk Comany,before the Atomic Sassey and 1;uensing naard, regarding The Senne of the Emaramacy

- ~ s

- rc -

mr u a un in the matter oflangIsland ushting Company, Shercham Nacinar Fooer Station, Unit 1, Docket No. 50322-01,$, April 6,19g7. 65. Direct T=tima=y of Gregory C. Minor regardag = = P'~ ' - * = = b t'e='a a - Manharing and Decontaminating. Shoreham Docket 50 322 OL 3 (Emergency Planmag), April 13,1987. Testimony of Oregory C. Minor, stema C. SboUy ot. at on behalf of Suffolk Conary, regarihag 66. I n erv = - ' = c-- . ps" - m- '- before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board,la a the assbar of imag Island Lightag Company, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Unit 1, Docket No. 30 3D OLES, AprE 13,1987 67. Rebuttal Testimony of Gregory C. Minor and Stevea C Shouy on behalf of Suffolk County regarding iJf fYYa Rae *:aa r+ ara, (3,6,n.1 o T= ' a=v of 12wis G. Hn1=43), la the t 8-ff. JUL 21 '23 14: 05 408 EEE 7143 N GE.003

~ master oflang lained 1Jghting Company, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unk 1, Docket No. 535Gr3,May 27,1987 68. Direst Testimmer of Dale G. Bridenbaugh and Gregory C Minor ce behalf of Mamnachusens Amarasy Osmeral, bekas the Fodoral Emery Regulatory Quamission, regardlag Canal Elamk c- -.&ae a--% u.ar 2 e-- - ^ - _a Docket No. naas. ?oscos Juk31,1987. ep. Direm Testimoor of Dane c. BehW and oresory C Minor before the Penneyhemia Public Utility 0

• '=. Regarding '_

V "= Unir 1 1979 O== Docket No.1 79tn0314 OCA Stateesset No. 2, Aagust 31,1987. 10. oral eastbosy of Gregory C Minor Bdore the rh* ranation Contro: Board on behar of Reed Caster Comunuairy Unit School District No. 255-U, re: Brandanad Cantaa Fond Scytessbar 8,1908, Case PCB 87 209. 71. Tesamony of Oregory C Minor in the U. S. Distria Court, Brooklyn, New York, *7 =t+: 31, 19 3,re:t w -avd= w a f n M at at Cass CV 87 646. 72, cm

• M B - -: * ' ^

. asw Rc-- Issess 5,10, and 24 prepared by MHB Technical Maa 4=*as for The Ohio State Universey Nacisar Engineering Program Espert Review Panel, Public Utitty Comianission of Ohio, October 1988. 73. Direst Testimony and Eskibits of Dale 0,2""T. Gregory C Minor and Steven C ShoDy on BehaN of Massachusetts Department of the Attoracy General Re: Pugria Nuclear Power Station, Ismannaation af P11erim Omaar. DPU 08 25, Noveanber 30,1988. 74. Sappisanastal Testimony of Dane G. lt"~ ' i Gregory C Minor and Steves C ShoDy as Behalf of )d-- a Department of the Astorney Oescrat, Re: P9eriet Nuclear Power Station,' d E L. C== =- DFU 88 28, January 20,1909, Rahibst AG 2. ^ 75. Testisaany of Oregory C Minor, U. S. D6 strict court, Brook % New York, February 3,1989, re: rw-*v af - ' a = 1 n m er mL Cass 87 CIV. 646 (IsW). 76. Surrebestal Testianony of Dale O. Eridesheagh, Gregory C Minor and Steven C shoDy on BehaN of u=== art=== eta Department of the Attoracy General, Re: PEgrim Nacisar Poser Station,in-*:--daa af hrim one== DFU 85 28, February 13,1989, Eskibit AG 74. 77 Surrebettal T% of Dale G. Bridsabeagh, Gregory C Minor and Steven C shouy on Behalf of Massachusetts Department of the Attorney General. Re: Pilgrina Nuclear Fower Stataos, lamatigatina of Pilarim Ontapa. DPU 85 28, February 17,1999, Eskibit AG-93. 9-f. JUL 21 *S9 14: 05 409 265 7149 PAGE.010

i ATTACHMENT 2 Statement of Professional Qualifications ( Steven C. Sholly j s-1

PkomruMMAL QUAR Mr1 CATIONS OFmVEN c slant 1 y STTVEN C.BIOLLY MHS Teduismi Amosistes 1125 Hambles Assene Sehe K SanJose, California 95125 (dos)206 2716 arrmanca Septamiber1985 PRESENT w. -m,a,.,.._ gw,,, es. __3 Aamodses is ensry enesultseg Brun that speciahams in technical and ecomaanic -==*a of seargy prodmaios facihties, espedally seclear, for local, state, and federal gn=ramsats and prween orp s h MHB is autensively inwohed is regnistory prossedmy' and the preparatina af steens and reports. Camdes research, write reports, panidpate la disonery preens is resdmory g " ;. denio, w=a y d einer documsans for regnimary proceediay, and respond to cEsat inquiries. Olents hows included: Stass of California, Stats of Near York, Stase of Elmois. February 1981 Seposeber1985 . _,a..e- - . uu a c - wm -- EC. Ramesseh assesiste and thk analyst for public interest group based la c~ *- ";. 53 ^ - r's that speciaksas in esamining the imipset of edvanced technologies on society, principaByin the areas of arms control and amargr. Teshmical work loenned on anclear power plant salsey, with emphasis on probablasdc risk -d radioinglemt amorpacy plaseing and,. . and seneric seistyissues. rhe resserd, prepared repons and medies, pernsipsed is *% proceedisy besars the U.S. Naciner Raguisery e

• • n amenoped tesimony, analysed NRC rule.mahng proposals and drat reports and prepared comments thereas, and responded to ingeiries from aposson, the seneral public, and the me64. Participated as a member of the Paesi on ACR$ E5eahemess (1985), the Panel on Regulatory Uses of Probabitstic Risk Assessment (Fear Review of NUREG-1850; 1984),

Iseted Observer to NRC Post Reviour meetiset on the saures term -* (Rho 2104; 19851984), and the ' '; ' __ Advisory Cossaktse on Neelser Risk for the Noelear Risk Tank Perse of the NationalNatia= cfInsurmace fa==iania=*rs (1984). I 1 1 f. JUL'21 '89-14: 07 409 IE6 7149 PAGE.011

~ Jammary1900-Jammary1931 _. __ m _ a.. e c___ _.. _.m , %._, __,_. _ _ m p,,,,a,, Casaur.Manidergt Poemsvhmaia Presided admislaraths diresian and esordianted research preiens for a public inairest yomp based in Harrides, Pennsylvania, =~ed around insmas reland to the Dree Mus Isined Nadser Power Piner Prepared Emedraising proposals, traded propens of U.S. Nadmar megeistory e ' ':-. U.s. Depmiment of Easesy, and c,enerai Puhuc utames ammune comoerning cleasap of Droe Mils Island Unit 2 and preparation for restart of nroe Mae Island Unit 1, and moeitered developesents re'ated to eenergemey planning, the t'anacial health of General Public Utuities, and NRC relemuking actions related to nree Mile IdanA July 1978-January 1900 m.. _, - _. _ _, w _ -e _.__,,_._._,_.-,_.yw,

n. u_,u Authenty Marsher. Pannedvanna Chief Eioingical Process Operator at a 2.5 aluion gnBoa per day tertiary, anivated sledge, west eser tremamme plant. *--

i for biologicat presen - $ -4 and control, ' sladas esalpais of physical, eL=kat and biological test nauks, process Said and mass Soir a managessent, micro bioingical analysis of activated aludes, and malate-mam af desaned process loss for impet into state and federal reports on treatmeet prosess and eEmant quality. Resolved certisse:Los from the Commoewaakh cf Pansylvania as a wastewater treatment plant operator. Member of Water FoBusios. Cmtrol A=aart-ta= of"-- 7 - *. Central Senios,1930. July 1977-July 1978 w- - Tr -- % o . =__ _ > or t -- - r - = ;- Wastewater treetssent plant operator at 2.0 aniben snuam por day aaaandary, masivated shedge, wastewater traan=*=r plast. Personned tanks as assiemed by supervisors, ladading simple phyncal and chemical tests on wastewater streams, = mima-and operstma of plant equipanant, and meistenance of the oo5edios system. Septomaber1976-June 1977 e *- - _ i 1 -. we,n e_=a _+=' n- _: e. HnL T - - Q c Taught Earth and Specs Sdemos at ainth grade level. Developed and impicewated new eourse materials as piste toccomics, envircassental geology, and space scenace. Served as Assistaat Coach of the distrks gymnastka team. September 197$ = Jes ip76 e' - y- * - -. cmLL Area C4 -C.R C# * - P-Taught Earth and Space Science and Enviran=*atal Science at mistb grade level. Developed and impicmented new course materials on plate tectomia, environacatal geology, r.oise pollution, water pollution, and energy. Served as Advisor to the Science Projeas Omb. 2-i me-i - i si

L 1 EDUCA't10N-B.S., Edeneden, asiors in Earth and space Science and General Scismos, annor in EnvirannastalN=eh C *-- State Couage,% t., Pennsylvania,1975. Gradeems amareewerk in land Use Plasming, shippcenburg State Counge, Shippeas Peumplianie,1m.19m. PUR12 CAT 10NE:

1. _

h . Mercebi lateasities from Newspaper Reports,'imap' of gam" Vd. 25, Im. 2. W - -- d A m 1 ' -- '- ^ A --- - ^ d E- - ' - F far Three un. r i ' N='= s Paner Plaat. Three Mile Jaland Public laterest Resource Center, Hamsburg, P-- Jammary 1981. 'l 3. A "M B

• an# CF- - d the a~M ' c--

~.B " " '8-- ' Ega, Union of C--_ /. Ed.; G ia, prepared for Rocidend Comary Emergnacy Pleaning ~ Personnel and the Chairman of the County 1segislatore, Wahington, D.C., Anguet 17,1981. 4 hF % for a 7._r 73 A* u t' - - P. La tha ? - WC. Pmhwev m ar - - Pan =r " C Union d Consomsd Scientists, Critient Mass Emery Proges, Nuclear Informatica and Rosoures Servies, Environmental Action, and New York Public la-terest Reneerd Grcap, Washingtes, D.C., Augnet 27,1981.

• 5.

Tales of commereed seiends, Iac, r'a====e= ce Notice of Proposed Reisuseking, Amendment to 10 CPR 50, Appendie E, Session IV.D.3,* Union of Comeermed Scisashss, Washiagica, D.C, Osober 21,1981.

• 6.

rhe Evoladon of Emergency Pissaing Ruhs," in % f^ ?- ' r " - A *ih on the d the 1 " - P, :-e - ' - - - P - rm h me, m, Um d Commerand Sesenses (Washugsaa, D.C.) and New York Pubhc Interest Research Group Yost, NY),1981. 7. " Union of Comeermed Sciensists Comassets, Propoecd Rule,10 CPR Part 50, Emergsacy Flamaing and Preparedness: Esercises, ClariAameia= of n. ' ' ' -. 46 P.R. 61134,' Union of Commersed Scinatists, Washiasson, D.C, Jemmary 15,19s2. * { 8. Tamrima=y of Robert D. PoEard and Steven C. Shouy before the Suh===lre== ca Energy an the Baviremesset, Committee as laterior and lasular Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, Mi&Esseum,T-- --/ ' March 29,1982, available from the Union of Comeerned Scientists. 9. " Union of Comeermed helate Detailed Comments on Petition for RnlammHar by Citanes's Task Paran, "n ri Planning,10 CPR Pans 50 and 70, Docket No. PRM 50 31, 47 P.R. 12639,* Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, D.C., May 24,1982. 10. Supplements to the Testimony of Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq., General Counsel, Union of Concerned W':-M.before the Subcommittee on Energy Comaervation and Power, Committee on Energy 1 \\

• S*

E .JUL 21 *GS 14: 06 408_266 7169 NCs-

and Commeros, UA House of Represcatathes, Union of Commerned %=*i=*= Washiagica, D.C, Ausset M,1982. 11. Tesdessy of Steven C Shouy, Union of Comoerned ta==i=*=. Washington, D.C, os behalf of the New York P6Ec Interest Reseerd Group, lac, before the Spesial e-= art-on Medaar Poser Saddy of the Assamibly of the State of New York, hennags om lagislash Oversight of the EmesguuyRadleingic7., :'- - Aa, Qapter M, Laws of 1981, $_7 E 2,1981. 12. acessenets en 'Drea r.. - r to Phial zeenamental st==ce Reisted to constromiam and opereenom of such me n eder Reanor Piant', Docket No. Ess7, Union of Commeraad Scientists, Washingsaa, D.C, September 13,1982.

• 13.

Unks of Concerned $dessists Comments on wport to the Couny c= '- :.', by the A d,isory en..ie., on a -" -t smerscacy Plan for Colmabia commer, Panasylinaia,- Unica of Coaccreed Scientists, Washington, D.C, September 15,1982. 14. = > > 7 w- ; ; Piemmies for Nede.r Reamor % pr ad o xernemersi. t Oas===*ald Congrees, Rotterdass, Mc Netherlands, Union of Conseraed 63 =r= = Washington, D.C, October 8,1982. 15. "Nedmar Raastor Accidsat e 7 = Impr.cari.== for Radiological Emergency Planning,* pressened to the Chissa's Advisory fa== lee-to Review Rocidaad Comery's Own Nuclear Eveamation and 7. y'~ - Plan and Oomeral Disesar Preparedesas Plan, Union of Commersed Saisudsen, Washington, D.C. November 19,1982. 16. Testimony of Steven C ShoBy befors the h8 aa--i tes ce Oversight and lavestigations, ch on laterior and lasalar A5 sirs, U.S. Haase of Representatives, Washington, D.C, Union of Commersed $ dentists, Desember 13,1981, 17. Testissesy of Gordon R. 'th-raam and Steven C. Shop as r==3=ta= Question Two, y Comesations 2.1(a) and 2.1(d) Union of Comesraad Scisadets and New York Pubbe l Ramssrek Grosy, before abs UA Nedner Regulatory fa==ivaEa= Atossic Sedsry and !Jamesing Board,in the Matter of Consolidseed Edinos Compsey of New York (Indian Point Unit 2) and the Poser Authersy of the Stam of New York (ladian Point Unit 3), Dodet Nos. 5247 SP and 5206.SP, Demeber 28,122.

• 14.

Testimony of Steven C Shop on the Consegneases of Ameidents at fadian Point (c==E=laa y Onsados One and Board Quesdom LL Union of Comeermed Sdentists and New York Pub 1sterost m.= ch Group, before the UA Nedser *. * -- y Commission Atonde Safety and I ta=== int Board, in tbs Matter of Emmaalidated Edison Company of Near York (ladian Point U3 2) and the Power Authority of the Stats of New York (Indian Point Unit 3), Docket Nos. S2='7 SP and S206.SP, Pobruary 7,1983, as corromed February 16,19tl. ' 19. Testimony of Steven C. Shop on Commission Ot=arian Five Union of Concerned bi==elata y and New Yark Public Interest Raseerd Oroup, before the US Nuclear Regulatory Ph Atemde Salsey and IJoensing Board, in the Matter of Faamalida**d Edisca Compsaraf New York (Indian Point Unit 2) and the Power Authority of the State of New York (Indian Point Unk 3), Docket Nos. S247 SP and 5286.SP, March 22,1983.

• 20.

' Nuclear Reector W=' and Accidcat Consegosaces. Plauang for the Worst," Union of Concerned Scientists, Washingloa, D.C., preacated at Critical Mass '83, March 26,1983. 4 f. 'JUL 21 '69 14: 0$ 40S ZEE 7149 FME. 014 )

c 21. Testimony of Stoma C. Shop on Emergency Planning and n:, ' w at Commercial y Nasinar Poner Flaats, Union of Conserand Sdendets, Washangton, D.C, before the w--a=*== on Nacicar Regulados, P--le*= os Environment and Pabue Works, U.S. Semag AprE 15,1983, (with ' Union of Concerned Scicadets' Response to Questions for the Record tem Seestar Alma K. Simpeaa,' Staes C Shady and Mkheel E. Padsa), 22. "PRA: What can k Ronny Yell Us About Public Risk ham Nedmar Asaklaats?

• Unica of Comeerned na:=wwa Washington, D.C, presamtation to the leth Ammaal Messias, Seasaast Anti-PoEution Laages, May4,1981.

23. "Probabilistic Risk Aa e====w The laspaa of Uncertalmi== on Radiological Emergency Plasming and P..

e- - ='

.* Union of Concerned Soo4 Washlagton, D.C, Juss 28,1981. 24.

• • ==pa== to GAO Quesdets on NRC's Une of PRA,' Union of Concerned $dutwa WS ;s D.C. October 6,1983, anack=*=r to letter deced October 6,1983, kom Samos C Sho8y to John E. Bagnolo (G/.0, Washingsaa, D.C.).

25. N af --- - J E =* na n"*

• 1 F--

-- n -- ? Cdmiduales, Union of Concerned Se=== rima, Washington, D.C., Deeensbar 22, 1983, attadamant to laatst dated hae===har 22,1983, fross $ssues C ShoBy to NRC r==3=da==e James E. A-le**== 26. Samewc5 T Public laquiry, Proof of Evidense on: ***='v w w. u--- i.a a-- of_ths.SimmaILFWR. Gordon Thosapson, wkk sopporums evulence by Steven shouy, os behalf of the Town and Country Plemming.M ^ '-, February 1994, including Aanes G,'A review of Probabilistic Rink Ammiysis and ks Apphandon to the Staewe5 PwR Semen Shony and oordon Thompson, (Aaget 11,1983), and Anam 0, "Emergemey Plemming is the UK and the US: A Comparisca,* Steven ShoBy and Gordos Thompson (Omober 24,1983). 27. Testimony of Steven C. Shony as Emergsacy Plaaming ea=*==da= Number Elevan, Union of Consarmed te&==ime, Washisaton, D.C, on behalf of the Pahmetto Alliance and the Carches Environmental Study Oroep, before the U.S. Neelaar Regalatory ca==&=ia= Atomac Safety and1Jonesing Board,is the Matter of Duke Poner a-pa=y, et. al. (Catansba Nuclear Station, r Unita 1 and 2), Dodat Nos 30 413 and M14, AprE 16,1994.

• Risk Indiretors nenevent to Assessing Nacicer Accident unbey Pr=&==C la PraHaimary 2s.

a=< to the ' ' " ' m P=" to b NAlc t'='- n:=k Tank h Deceanbar 11,1984, Samon C. SheDy, Union of Concerned Saastists, Wasbagton, D.C.

s.

Union of Comenrand Sciendets' and Nacisar Infor=wlam and Resource Swvic(s Joint Comments on NRC's Proposal to Bar frosa Ucsanlag Proceedags the Consideration of Earthquake E8ects as Emergseey Plasming,* Union of Comeermed Scisedsts and Nacisar ladonameles and Resource Service, Washington, D.C, Diane Curran and E0ys R. Weiss (with input hem Steves C Shouy). Febraary 28,1985.

• 30.

"Smere Aasident Source Tenas: A Presentation to the e "=3 on the Status of a Review of the NRC's Source Tena Reassessment Stady by the Union of Commersed Scioatists,' Union of Concerned Scientists, Washlagton, D.C, April 3,1985.

• l 5-1 JUL y.1 *69 14: 1 i

____________------------{___________ W lAS-7 Id

1. O'

i 31. " Severe Aandent Sowes Twas for Light Wate Nuclear Power Plants: A PreseNados to the IRinais t -- ~ of Nuclear Safety on the Status of a Review of the NRC's Source Term n-

== me Study (ffRS) by the Union of Concerned Scaestata? Union of Coseerned Soisselsh, Wa Nacios, D.C, May 13,1M5. j g m.-- w _c sa, g,s, e_ _. s -m w.m as the Mac==~ T=, a - r_ _ mune IRE Usina of Coseerned ad.er. data, Cambridge, Massacheneas, Steven C. Shady sat Gordon Thompson, Jemmary 1986. 33. Direa Testbaomy of Dale G. Bridsabaugh, Oropory C Mknor, Lynn R. Prics, and Stevea C ShoDy as bebnif of State of ra=== alar Depamment of Public Utuiry Control, Prosecutenal Desissoa and Dhuion of Comeumer Comanal, regarthag the prudemoe of W%ees on Millstone Unit M.Pobruary it,126. 34. t.pr.w.o.a of the Chernobyl4 Accident for Nuclear Emergsacy Plandag for the State of New York, propered for the State af New York Consumer Protestion Board, by MHB Technical ? _ ' n.Jens 1906. 1$. nas,, ar y_ =n y+ c=_: *- - -., w. e c. a p's at e -. y - - - r-Ear the V_ =e Y" - N=' - r- - P'-Z prepend for New Eagland Coalition on Nasisar PoEmios, Inc., December 16,1986. 36. Adidevit of Stoma C $hoEy before the Atoude Safety and Uemmeing Board, la the matter of Pubhc Service Compesy of New Hampshire, a al., regardm2 Seabrook Stados Units 1 and 2 os eite Emwssocy Plamalag Issues, Docket Nos. D443 0L & SG 444 01, January 23,1987. 37. Direct Testimony of Richard B. Hubbard and Steven C Sho8y on behalf of CaBiornia Public Utgities. P . regarding Diablo Canyon Rate Case, PG&E's Pailure to Estabbah Its f'a==*=I Desigs QA Program, Appikation Nos. 84 06-014 asi 85 06425, Eskibit No.10,935, Mara,1987. 3s. Testanomy of oregory c Minor, stevia c shou w. al. on behalf of sesolk Commy, resseding r LILCO's Reception Centers (Pleaning Basis), before the Atonde Safety and f tanasing Board,la the anatter of Long Island LJghtang Counpany, Shorehasa Nuclear Power Statica Unit 1. Docket No.50 322cL 3, Apr213,1987. 39. Rebuttal Testimony of Gregory C Mm' or and Steven C ShoNy se behalf of Sufolk Coasty resenhag LILCO's Reception Centers (Addressing Testimony of Lewis G. Hulman), Dochet No.S322 OL.3, May 27,1987. 40. Rmisw of a-lan*=A Aspects of NUREG 1150, 'Raactor Risk Referease Dae===ar

• prepared for the IEinois Depamoest of Nuclear Safety by MHB Techakal Associates, September 1987.

Direst Tsushmany of Richard B. Hubbard and Steven C Ebouy on behalf of the Pennsylvania 41. 05as of Caesamer Adecate, before the Pennsylvania Public Utility ra==i.=taa, Evatustaan of Beaver Valey Unit 2 Plant Costs, OCA Statement 6, Docket No. R.870651 October 23,1987. 42 Plas! Daaa t C==Laa* F.eea n AN=e'ia-the ew d n--war Vallev Fw tr=sian Unh 1 prei.a for Peass,L A OtSce of Consumer Advocate, by MHB Techascal Amociates, OCA Exhibit 6A. October 1987. + E. JUL 21 '89 12: 10

~ .9 43, &a n-_ ~.- - ym. 3 & c,., or _a van E EdMt 64,Onteber1987guepsed for Psamptvaam OSes of F-fi =. b c=>___ unk i a 44. 9errebunal Tumhussy of Richard B. Hubbard and smen C shony heder Pdes UWhy Camusinion, on bekaK at the Pennsyhenia omae of c W 810661. Desember 7,1987.reemdes Beelmeston af Beaver Vaasy U Ad.ones, 45. Teshnomy on Diablo Casyon Rats Csee, Daniya Omaller Ansaram Tamina y of Rishard B. Hubbwd and Steven C Shony, on behaK e uttal UtDides ch tiAsian of Rasspsyer Advosases, Appliennes Nos. 3446414 an c a:5, Em No. M,dfo, September 1988. 46. Testianomy em Diablo Campon Reis r=. " et GA *~ ' '~ ,,a . _ g, g y_, 1 '- ^ F "-- ^~ And Nar I and II, Suppiamental and Rebuttal Tesimesy of Riehard B. Hubba As A u-~ - ^ hat Volumes bebet of abs CaWornia Public Utaisies Cosemisios, DMsion af Ra o y en AppEcation Nos. 8646414 and 8548015. EnhMt No.16,650, September 198 47. Assonisess for Tbs Ohio State Unroerssty Nucle n ca Puhte Udhry Coussaission of Ohio, October 1988.

assi, 48.

Dweet Teminnemyand 8'm of Dele O. Bridsabeagh, Oregory C Mino on Behalf of S*-- Stasion,1sventhetion of Pilgrim Outap, DFU 3628, November 30,1 or 49. Seppicasatal Tesdmony of Dale G. Bridsabeugh, Grupry C Minor and S Behar of Messesbasetts Deparuneet of the Attorasy General, Re: o y on stasion,1svestipsdom of PEgru Oatsen, DPU 45 28 Jamesry 20,1989, Eah r 50. Bebat of Mases& mesas Department of abs Atto Station, Investigation of Pdgrim Outags, DPU N.2% Pobruary 13,1999, Es ur 51. ~ Surrebuttal Testianomy of Dels G. Bridsabesch, Gregory C Mino Behnt of "^^- ~^ lavestigation of Pilyiss Outage, DFU 86 28, Pobruary 17,1989. E st. 'a w + em r n san-w " unn w.-. w w w-e Seeurity Stades,Pubruary1989.Radiatominal Emmarymmer R=.c.;x P -- sar r asaurae and Aveliable from the U.S. Nuclear Rega!atory P= 2--% Public Documcar R H Street, N.W., Washlaggon, D.C. y, f.

---

- ~- - - ~ ~ - - _ _, _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ - - - - - - - " ^

3--,. m v. --v-- - - - - - - -re-.--- -m----p-n- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - --- - - - - - -r-- - -------w-s / 4 3 b a ~,)'.: 'l 9 * 'g "'d ( }. '[ i 9 g { 3 ^.'1' c.a' I L J 4 ' f.-',, f' I 1,. _ ,'d, ,r ) L W 4 5 <1. + [ t s h 1 l i 'I ') ) '- ___"L_____ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - -- ^'^^^- ^ ~ .m

( Ji,, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ur NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 89 AUS 29 P4 :17 Before the Administrative. Judges: gg MXe l Ivan W. Smith, Chairman I" Dr. Richard F. Cole Kenneth A. McCollom ) In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL ) 50-444-OL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ) (Off-Site EP) OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, _E_T _AL. ) ) (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) August 28, 1989 ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, John Traficonte, hereby certify that on August 28, 19o9, I made service of the within INTERVENERS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADD BASES TO LOW POWER TESTING CONTENTION FILED ON JULY 21, 1989 AND TO ADMIT FURTHER CONTENTIONS ARISING FROM LOW POWER TESTING EVENTS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO REOPEN THE RECORD AND SECOND REQUEST FOR HEARING by Federal Express as indicated by (*), and by first class mall on August 29, 1989 to:

• Ivan W.

Smith, Chairman

• Kenneth A. McCollom Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 1107 W.

Knapp St. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Stillwater, OK 74075 Commission East West Towers Building

• Docketing and Service 4350 East West Highway U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Betnesda, MD 20814 Commission Washington, DC 20555
• Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety & L' censing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 l

l l L__ __ - _ _ j

l l

• Robert R. Pierce, Esq.
• Thomas G. Dignan, Jr.,

Esq. Atomic Safety & Licensing'Bna d Katherine Selleck, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory. Commission Ropes & Gray East West Towers Building One International Place 4350 East West Highway Boston, MA 02110 Bethesda MD 20814 H. Joseph Flynn, Esq.

• Sherwin E.

Turk, Esq. Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of General Counsel "ommission Federal Emergency Management Office of the General 'Caunsel Agency 15th Floor 500 C Street, S.W.: 11555 Rockville Pike Washington, DC 20472 Rockville, MD 20852 Atomic Safety & Licensing Robert A. Backus, Esq. Appeal Board Backus, Meyer & Solomon Um S.' Nuclear Regulatory 116 Lowell Street Commission P.O. Box 516 Washington, DC 20555 Manchester, NH 03106 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Jane Doughty U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Washington, DC 20555 5 Market Street Portsmouth, NH 03801 Charles P. Graham, Esq. Barbara St. Andre, Esq. Murphy & Graham Kopelman & Paige, P.C. 33 Low Street 77 Franklin Street Newburyport, MA 01950 Boston, MA 02110 Judith H. Mizner, Esq. R. Scott Hill-Whilton, Esq. 79 State Street Lagoulis, Hill-Whilton 2nd Floor & Rotondi Newburyport, MA 01950 79 State Street Newburyport, MA 01950 Dianne Curran, Esq. Ashod N. Amirian, Esq. Harmon, Curran, & Torsley 145 South Main Street Suite 430 P.O. Box 38 2001 S Street, N.W. Bradford, MA 01835 Washington, DC 20008 Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Senator Gordon J. Humphruf U.S. Senate One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Washington, DC 20510 Concord, NH 03301 (Attn: Tom Burack) (Attn: Herb Boynton)

b John P. Arnold, Attorney General ,Phillip Ahrens, Esq. Office of the Attar a "eneral Assistant Attorney General 25 Capitol Street Department of the Attorney Concord, NH 0 301 General Augusta, ME 04333 William S. Lord Board of Selectmen Town Hall - Friend Street Amesbury, MA 01913 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUEETT5 JAMES M. SHANNON ATTORNEY GENERAL j I ohn Traf rconte / hlef, Nuclear Safety Unit Department of the Attorney General One Ashburton Pl?ce Boston, MA 02108-1698 (617) 727-2200 DATED: August 28, 1989 l I}}