ML20246E717

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Approval of Design Revs to ATWS Mitigation Sys by 891101 in Order to Support Installation During Byron Unit 1 Refueling Outage Scheduled to Begin in Jan 1990
ML20246E717
Person / Time
Site: Byron, Braidwood, 05000000
Issue date: 08/16/1989
From: Chrzanowski R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Murley T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
0234T, 234T, NUDOCS 8908290270
Download: ML20246E717 (2)


Text

.- -.

E 5

, Comm:nw cith Edison -.

,[

( f,'_',

- 72 West Adams Street, Chicago, tilinois.

tal,.3 s

\\

Address Reply tr: Tost Dilice BM67~-

h.,

' Chicago, Illinois 50690. 0767 s

August '16, ~ 1989.-

p i

-Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Director..

. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

0;S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Hashington, DC.20555 ff

Subject:

Byron: Station Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station Units 1 and.2 10 CFR 50.62 ATHS' Rule NRC Docket Nos. 50-454/455 and 50-45.5L4M.

Reference:

(a) February 15, 1989, letter from S. C. Hunsader to T. E. Murley (b) June 30, 1989, letter from L. N. Olshan:to T. J. Kovach (c) July 18, 1989, letter from S. P. Sands to T. J. Kovach

Dear Dr. Murley:

In references (b) and (c) Commonwealth Edison. received approval of

.the Byron and Braidwood Stations design for the ATHS Mitigation System.

required to satisfy'the requirements of 10 CFR 50.62.

During'the performance of the human-factors engineering reviews required in.the Safety Evaluation-Reports, four items were identified for revision to the design that was

submitted in reference (a).

The Attachment to this letter contains a description of the proposed revisions to the design.

Commonwealth Edison requests approval of the. design revisions to the ATHS Mitigation' System by November 1,1989, in order to support the

. installation of the system during-the Byron Unit I next refueling: outage scheduled to begin in January 1990.

Please direct any questions regarding this matter to this office.

Very truly yours, SMW 89082%$$$$$$$5A R. A Chrzanowsk DR PDC Nuclear Licensing Administrator cc:

Byron Resident Irspector g[

Braidwood Resideat Inspector L

i I S. P. Sands

'.rtR L. N. Olshan NRR Region III 07fice Office of Nr: lear facility Safety - IDNS 0234T:2 L

f&

e 4,

yuC-V ATTACHMENT Reauested Revisions to Anoroved ATWS Mitication' System (AM U Desian for Byron /Braidwood Stations 1.

Present design derives all-four steam generator level inputs from.

one channel, RPS Channel ISG Level.

Revised design would derive 2 steam generator level inputs from-channel 1 and 2 steam generator levels from Channel 2.. This change would eliminate the possibility of a unit trip from the.AMS for any possible loss of steam generator level input to AMS'from a single l-RPS channel.

Isolation and segregation of inputs would be maintained in accordance with the present approved design. This change.is desired to improve AMS reliability against false L

actuations.

2.

Present design incorporates Main Control Room Annunciators which annunciate "AMS Inoperable" and "24VDC P/S Failure". The revised design would combine the inputs to these annunciators into a single annunciator "AMS Trouble" with each of the inputs "AMS Inoperable" and "24VDC Power Supply Failure" providing a sequence of events recorder message. This change results from human factors. review of the system design.

3.

Present design includes main control board indicator lights for "AMS Initiated " and "AMS in Test".

Revised design would eliminate both of these indicators. The "AMS Initiated" indicator is redundant because there is an "AMS Initiated" Annunciator.

The "AMS In Test" indication will be added as an input to the "AMS Trouble" annunciator with a separate sequence of events recorder message for "AMS in Test".

This change results from human factors review of the system design.

4.

Present design arms the AMS at 40% power. Revised design would reduce the arming setpoint to 30%.

This would permit the arming permissive light in the Main Control Board to conform to the dark board concept. Arming at the lower power level is in a conservative direction. This change results from human factors review of the system design.

__