ML20246A277
| ML20246A277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1989 |
| From: | Randy Erickson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Zwolinski J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8905080219 | |
| Download: ML20246A277 (2) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
t l
Docket No. 50-440 May 3, 1989
]
l i
MEMORANDUM FOR:
John A. Zwolinski, Acting Branch Chief l
Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch j
Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation l
q 4
FROM:
Robert A. Erickson, Chief l
Reactor Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards
SUBJECT:
SALP' ASSESSMENT PERIODS PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (5/1/88 - 5/30/89)
In accordance with your memorandum of April 1,1989, subject as above, our SALP input for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant is provided in the enclosed assessment.
'fw,wt ehod b'r ph4 A WMen Robert A. Erickson, Chief Reactor Safeguards Branch l
Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards i
Enclosure:
As stated J
cc:
T. Colburn, NRR, 1
R. Ingram, NRR CONTACT:
R. B. Manili, NRR x20940 Distribution RSGB r/f DRIS r/f PDR l
RErickson LBush RManili CBuracker(2)
Case File i
FDocket"Fils?50f440
+
{0' (PERRY SALP ASSESSMENT) i i
0FC
- RSGB:NRR
- RSGB:NRR
- RSGB:NRR
- RSGB:NRR
- RSGB NAME :CBuracker:bj
- RBMani i
- LLBush
- RDube
- RAE son BATE"!~5/ E /55~" " "!5/E /55 " ~~"~!5fE 25h" ~~~~!5/ 755"" " ~~!57~ /55 "~ " "!'" ~ "~" " ~~
~E 8905080219 890503 Pt
{DR ADOCK 05000440 1'
PDC 7
j l
ENCLOSURE SALP ASSESSMENT FACILITY NAHE: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Summary of Review / Inspection Activities During this rating period, the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) recently went through a refueling outage in which the security department identified, prior to the outage, a security concern that would require compensatory posts for a period of approximately 2 months.
In addition, a site visit by RSGB is being scheduled for the end of May 1989 to look at a Region III concern involving the temporary interface barrier between Units 1 and 2.
Narrative Discussion of Licensee Performance Reactor Safeguards Branch This security department has always been very up front with the NRC in identifying actions that may impact on the overall security system.
An example would be the refueling outage in February 1989 that presented a problem with the fuel handling building which serves both units. Since Unit 2 is still in a construction 1
stage, part of the safety related ventilation system will require armed com-I pensatory posts in the Unit 2 area during the process of moving the fuel from the Unit I reactor to the fuel pool. The licensee notified Region III, who in turn contacted RSGB, so that the situation could be resolved. The licensee did go to the Region III offices with pictures and drawings in hand to work out how security would provide adequate security measures during this period of time.
l Regarding the upcoming site visit in May 1989, Regico III has expressed concerns l
with the temporary interface barrier between the operating unit and the. construction I
unit.
In a conference call between the utility, Region III and RSGB, the utility attempted to determine what they will be required to do if Unit 2.should either be delayed for a number of years or permanently mothballed.
The RSGB licensing reviewer and Region III inspector will meet at the site to determine what actions, if anything, will be required to improve detection and assessment along the i
interface barrier.
RER Findings An RER is scheduled for Perry the week of September 11-15, 1989. Any findings.
j will be addressed in the next rating period.
Author: R. B. Manili, NRR Date:
liay 3,1989
- _ _ - _ _ -