ML20245L819

Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1989 for Haddam Neck Plant

ML20245L819
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	07/31/1989
From:	Miller D, Wall K CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8908220326
Download: ML20245L819 (10)

Text

n__.

.s b

I CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC ' POWER COMPANY i

HADDAM NECK PLANT -

RR#1

• BOX 127E

• EAST HAMPTON, CT 06424-9341 August 15, 1989 Re:

Technical Specification 6.9.1d Docket No. 50-213 U.- S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Sir:

In accordance with reporting requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1d, the Connecticut Yankee Haddam Neck Plant Monthly Operating Report 89-07, covering operations for the period

~

July 1,1989 to July 31, 1989 is hereby forwarded.

Very Truly yours,

~

/

Donald B. Miller, Jr.

Station Superintendent DBM/mdw cc:

(1)

Regional Administrator, Region 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 (2)

John T. Shediosky

/p Sr. Resident Inspector Connecticut Yankee g

kgge2gggggggg[,gg33

)

- - - - _ - - - - 9

,q

,f.

v' >..

'}'

j$ '

A&.

4

_.s;

-(

m ;.

ff%g ':/y..

Connecticut lYankee Atomic. Power Company s

1. C &

4 1Haddam Neck Plant, 4

v<

4. -

Haddam,.: Connecticut-F 5

r, j _

l'

. c w.

lk;'l

\\.

m"f 1:v

;f" s

e:

l-

_Il 4-i i=4

\\'

i,

.g.

l f..

k 4

o Monthly Operating Report No. 89-07 For The Month of 4

July 1989 C

E._

l.1.-.

u

s'

' Plant Operations 'Summarv - July. 1989 The' followingjis a _ summary of Plant Operations for July,1989.

The plant: was operated at 100% power until July 9 at 0025 hours2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br />,

. when-power.was reduced to 65% power for. a routine _ turbine valve test. : At 0310 hours0.00359 days <br />0.0861 hours <br />5.125661e-4 weeks <br />1.17955e-4 months <br />, the test was successfully completed and a load increase. was started.

By 1020 hours0.0118 days <br />0.283 hours <br />0.00169 weeks <br />3.8811e-4 months <br />, the plant was at 100% power.

On July 23' at 2135 ' hours, the plant reached the end of core life and coastdown was started.

On July 24 at 0837 hours0.00969 days <br />0.233 hours <br />0.00138 weeks <br />3.184785e-4 months <br />, while attempting to open the #4 turbine governor control valve, the control valve opened suddenly, causing a short duration steam flow transient.

Power was reduced to 90% and turbine load was' stabilized.

By 0856 hours0.00991 days <br />0.238 hours <br />0.00142 weeks <br />3.25708e-4 months <br />, the #4 governor valve was verified to be operating satisfactorily and a load increase was

- started.

By 0947 hours0.011 days <br />0.263 hours <br />0.00157 weeks <br />3.603335e-4 months <br />, the. plant was at 100% power.

- The plant continued to operate at 100% power for the remainder of the. month.

l l

.3 l

l

bll-i.

b

)

j

^

S' Y

t

.t0 - T h

1EE

.TDF

.UIA

.AVSR

.CO-I

.ERRA w

RFOP

. P TE OCR

'L T.A

.A EG

. INRN CE I

E K R' R PAOU

. STFD NOT IN TE CVN' AEO RI EPT V

I IOI

TTk, C

P

.E N E RER RK

.OA~

.CT'

~

N'.N

,O

.O

. I TET CFA EAR FSE F

P E

O 9

8

/

6 TLU SER NO ITCNU

.F LAM E S

U A

C C

&1

~

e o

h n

t e

T el r 9

N rb of 8 E

aaf o9 M

N t

1 O

E O

er sh O

.TRP r omt y SOM e p e nl Y

O h et ou e

. S ~~ C T ri mJ l

7t!l!

lL!

l9t

~

S N

I O

T IEE TDF UIA AVSR CO~ I ERRA a

RPOP TE P'OCR LTA-A

.EG m

INRN CE I

EKRR PAOU

' STFD N'

OT IN TE CVN AEORI EPT V

I IOT TTE C

P,

ENE RER RK OA CT N

N

'O O

I TET CFA EAR FSE F

P E

.O 9

. 8

/

T 8

LUSE R

N O

IT CN e

UF c

L na A

e

. M E n

S t

U n

A i

C a

M sme t h9 oit 8 n

n9 T

eo1 N

el m E

rb M

N aae y E

O thl O

T'R P ert u 6

SOM r o J

Y O

e pr S

C h eof T rf o

((I;ll it l

i l

ll L

pg,L l

.1 p,, ~

.-1

g., 'f.

,r 9.,'

"}

-]

_ ~ i AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL a

, DOCKET NO._

50-213 e:,

n.

Conn. Yankee UNIT Haddam Neck DATE ~ August 15, 1989~

~~i4 L COMPLETED BY ' K.' C. Wall ~

TELEPHONE (203) 267 3654--

MONTH: july 1989 4

DAY '-

' AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL

-DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL l(MWe-Net).

(MWe-Net) 1 562--

17 565-

,~2L

-56'1 18

.565 31

'558-19 564-4-

559 20 564.

'5' 559 21 563 6

561 22 562

'7 562 23 562 8.

562

'24 556 9-521 25-552 10' 560-26 543 11' -

561-

-27 532' 12

~562-28 532 13.

sso 29 543

- 14' '

564 30 547 15f 564 31 547

-16.

564

-INSTRUCTIONS On:this_ format, list the< average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day

~

.in the reporting month.

Complete the nearest whole megawatt.

-1 (9/77) j 1

J

~~ ~-~ - ~ '

m.

c x

w.

77 -

l Jr l 1

2

(.'

CONNECTICUT YANKEE REACTOR COOLANT DATA l MONTH. JULY 1989 1

' REACTOR COOLANT. ANALYSIS MINIMUM AVERAGE MAXIMUM

~....................................................................

PH 0 25 DEGREES C-6.91E+00 1 8.00E+00 :

9.36E+00'.

CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS/CM)

. 3.68E+00 7.20E+00 :

1.17E+01 :

CHLORIDES (PPM)

<5.00E-02 : <5 00E-02 :-<5.00E-02 :-

DISSOLVED-0XYGEN (PPB)

<5.00E+00 : <5.00E+00

<5.00E+00

-BORON!(PPM)

- 2.00E+00 :

2.42E+01 :

6.50E+01 :

LITHIUML(PPM).

2.05E-01 :

4.08E-01 7.24E-01':

TOTALLGAMMA ACT.'(UC/ML) 7.73E-01 :

1.01E+00

.'1.61E+00L:

. IODINE-131 ACT. (UC/ML) 2.32E-02 : '3.25E-02':

9.73E-02 t' e

I-131/I-133 RATIO 2.55E+00'

-3.02E+00 :

4.51E+00

! CRUD (M3/ LITER)

<1.00E-02 : <1.00E-02 : <1.00E-02 TRITIUM (UC/ML)-

4.18E-01 :

6.25E 8.47E-01 :

HYDROGEN'(CC/KG) 2.15E+01 :

2.67E+01 3.04E+01-:

).

AERATED LIQUID WASTE PROCESSED (GALLONS):

1.27E+05 WASTE LIGUID PROCESSED THROUGH BORON RECOVERY (GALLONS)*

1.89E+05.

AVERAGE PRIMARY LEAK RATE (GALLONS PER MINUTE):

3.86E-01 PRIMARY TO SECONDARY LEAK RATE (GALLONS PER MINUTE):

1.22E-03 l

l l

1.

l :.

I

= _ _ _ - _

j i +

3_

*:t;

.g f

NRC OPERATING STATUS REPORT Haddam Neck.

?1. Docket: 50-213-

, 2.' Reporting Period: 07/89.. Outage + Dn-line Hours:

0.0 + 744.0 = 744.0

-3.'utitity Contacts-J. Stanford (203) 267-3635

' 4. Licensed Thernet Power (MWt):. 1825 c5. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): 667 x 0.9 = 600.3 (6. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): 582 4

7. Maximum Dependable capacity (Grose MWe)

591.8 -

8. Maximum Dependable capacity (Wet MWe): 565

9. If changes occur above since test report, reasons are: NONE

10. Power level to which restricted, if any (Net MWe): N/A-

. 11. Reasons for restriction,.lf any: N/A MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE CUMULATIVE

-- 12. Report period hours:

744.0 5,087.0 189,191.0

13. Hours reactor critical:

744.0 5,087.0 157,453.0 14.--Reactor reserve shutdown hours:

0.0 0.0 1,285.0 15." Hours generator on-line:

744.0 5,087.0 151,315.6

'16. Unit reserve shutdown hours:

0.0 0.0 398.0

17. Gross thermat' energy generated sMWtH):

1,351,483.0 8,111,154.0 261,511,715.0 *

18. Gross electrical energy generatul (MWeH):

434,057.0 2,693,294.0 85,664,505.0

• 19.' Net electrical' energy generated (MWeH):

413,683.6 2,559,522.2 81,426,002.0 *

20. Unit service factor:

100.0 100.0 80.0

21. Unit aval1abitity factor:

1'>0.0 100.0

80.2

22. Unit capacity factor using MDC nets 98.4 89.1 78.5

23. Unit capacity factor using DER net:

95.5 86.5 74.0

24. Unit forced outage rate:

0.0 0.0 5.6

. e

25. Forced outage hours:

0.0 0.0 8,975.6

.26. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type,date, duration): Refueling, 09/02/89, 56 days.

4 1

27. If currently shutdown, estimated startup date: N/A

• Cunulative values f rom the first criticality (07/24/67). (The remaining cumulative values are from the first date of commercial operation, 01/01/68).

.', f - I k _ i u_. _

.__.._,_.c..

[.-

tf 3W m ni D(

M DC m tr 3w 44 3 D DC &

O r "

CC nM n

0 r

C

.- au

.s C

nM m

van ey ag

,e c n=

mp g

m e

,e m

m o o m)NN m

4 n

g g U"

M "V

O N,

g g

H Q tr Mw 3U 3..

g p

.o og w tr D(

q m I M D( O sc V Op fO n

n y

O %

- MW O

N M

o te e*

Df O e M.3p M M

g 3

tr D( $M 8

- tr O

zt 1p M on q

M M O

W Z

Z C te C Df O

'c N M tr M

'c q %

2 CO O

3tll M 3W m :::

g g

q

• = M er Df c

• 3 ag M C D

<Z M

H HM

• G O tr M

MM.

• 3 mn C MM MM^

M

$$y e

u m tr m bh' h

fC 3H C>

D(

4m O

N M

O O O

I"(

N Bmv N 3 B on m 3U m N

H edoC 5E 7 5 tnenopmoC

~*g

~5

• • D D E M

.C C

C C Dt O O 3 F *2

• m mC n er % 3>C C I I I I 2-Nw>

a edoC g

metsyS o

4 H'

CC tet st; wH

=

W M7

==>

cp 00

'" M

.m.

,.r W

rotcaeR s.

3 nwoD

^

h gnittuhS fo dohteM

C

.[.

m o

c l

E T

E

~

it nosaeR 5

z 2

m C

M a

m

.~9 iw w

c v

m a

w

.a

=>

=

+

iM C

m m

m a

m a

O W

p--

)sruoH(

e*

s+

o Zc N

o?

x' noitaruD M

M n

e ne n

m n

ot m

• > n M

l nH ne e

C te n n

an m u. < m w

n

..r o

D< -

epyT m

xur i

m m

ne-n ws m a e

a mm n =

M

• r 3

m C c m..C e

D< nn n s e - c

• r.-, n

• • C

• r Q*

m3 m

w C C C R m R E C C C

• m M C.C C

2-3f

.rl c. D C

• f GM

%%MC>O 4

m i 1 e e I 1 1 C

Cll > 21 C C M M O N

.C C

w C

.C.C Cco C

m *=

2 C n m 1U l

Refueline Information Reauest r

4 1.

Name of facility Haddam Neck 2.

Scheduled date for next refueling shutdown.

September 2,1989 3.

Scheduled date for restan following refueling.

November 3,1989 4.

(a)

Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

Yes (b)

If answer is yes, what, in general, will these be?

Incorporate the guidance provided in the NRC Generic Letter 88-16. The Generic Leter addresses removing cycle specific parameters from Technical Specifications and transferring them to the technical repon supponing cycle operation.

(c)

If answer is no, has the reload fuel design and core configuration been reviewed by your Plant Safety Review Committee to determine whether any unreviewed safety questions are associated with the core reload (Ref.10 CFR section 50.59)?

n/a (d)

If no such review has taken place, when is it scheduled?

n/a 5.

Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting infonnation.

July 28,1989 6.

Imponant licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g., new or different l

fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in fuel design, new operating procedums.

j No 7.

The number of fuel assemblies (a) in the core and (b) in the spent fuel storage pool.

(a) 157 (b) 653 8.

The present licensed spent fuel pool storage capacity and the size of any increase in licensed storage capacity that has been requested or is planned, in number cf fuel assemblies.

I168 9.

The projected date of the last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity.

1996

_ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _