ML20245L262
| ML20245L262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/09/1989 |
| From: | Malloy M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245L266 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908220057 | |
| Download: ML20245L262 (4) | |
Text
- g /*'
No UNITED STATES
,,, p' c+
n NUCLEAR REGULATOFW COMMISSION
,j
,y WASHINGTON, D. C. 2055b
~!
...../
August 9, 1989 Docket hos. 50-445 and 50-446 APPLICANT: Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric)
FACILITY:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING ON AUGUST 1, 1989 - COMANCHE PEAK OPERATION! QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
'On August 1, 1989, the NRC staff met with representatives of TU Electric in Rockville, Maryland to discuss the applicant's proposed responses tc the staff's July 11, 1989 request for additional information on the Comanche Peak operations quality assurance (QA) program. Tbc meeting notice with a copy of the staff's request for information as the agenda and the list of meeting at-tendees are provided as Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively, to this summary.
TU Electric provided a handout (Enclosure 3) which contains its draft responses to each of the staff's 19 questions. The staff and applicant discussed the responses ar!d a preliminary agreement on the acceptability of the draft responses was reached for all but two of the questions. The agreed-to resoluti-- for each question is annotated in Enclosure 3 following the TU Electric draft response.
TU Electric will formally respond as shown in the draft response and provije an advance FSAR amendment to incorporate agreed-to changes.
The questions (18d ar.d 16f) for which resolutions were not reached at this meeting both pertain to the scope of the QA program shown in FSAR Table 17A-1.
These appear on pages 21 through 23 of Enclosure 3.
Question 18d requires ad-ditional research and review by the applicant and 18f requires further staff review. The staff and applicant expect to reach agreement on responses to these questions during a telephone conference call by mid-August 1969.
Following the initial discussion of the agenda items, staff caucused to research several items brought up during the discussions.
Following the breek, the staff reported on the results of its caucus. TU Electric provided additional ex-planation on how it intends to respond to Question 16. Af terwards, Mr. Spraul read his draft safety evaluation to gain assurance from the applicant that it correctly characterizes the QA program described in the FSAR.
It was noted t n the applicant's July 25, 1989 advance FSAR amendment submittai (TXX-89489) on FSAR Section 13.1, affects various titles used in Mr. Spraul's safety evaluation.*
- On August 4, 1959 the undersigned project manager was advised by the applicant that it is reviewing FSAR Chapter 17 for necessary revisions resulting from the changes provided in TXX-89489, and that it will provide necessary revisions as part of the upcoming formal response to the staff's QA questions discussed in this meeting.
Q Y gSS88s8188jk 6
A
n- ::. ;
- 'Li k
L.
Summary of Meeting on B/1/89 '
c TU Electric agreed it could furnish its formal responses to the questions by the L end of August 1989 to permit Mr. Spraul sufficient time to finalize.his safety l
evaluation.
9 r
Melinda Mall 6y, Project nager Comanche Peak Project Division i
Office of Nuclear _ Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
l 1.
Meeting Notir.e and Agenda L
.2.
List of Attendees 4
l' 3.
Draft Responses to QA Questions cc.: See next page i
l i
l i
e i
I l
t
-4 :.
August 9, 1989
_, a:L Sunnary of. Meeting on 8/1/89
- 2.-
1T3 Electric agreed it could furnish its formal responses to the questions by the end of August 1989 to permit Mr. Spraul sufficient time to finalize his safety evaluation.
/s/
Melinda Malloy.. Project Manager Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation t.nclosures:
1.
Meeting Notice and Agenc'a
'2.
List of Attendees
-3.
Draft Responses to QA Questions cc:.See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket Fil NRC PDR Local PDR ADSP Reading CPPD Reading DCrutchfield TQuay CGrimes PMcKee
.JLyons.
RWarnick
'JHWilson-MMa11oy
-MFields CHale-JRoe AGody
-FHawkins JSpraul OGC JPartlow i
EJordan-BGrimes/JZwolinski CVandenburgh ACRS(10)
CPP AD:CPPD RR malloy:cm MFi ds JHWilso
'08/cf/89 08///89 08//[/89 0Fct
\\
_________________1_
4
- t 4
I' cc:
Asst. Director for Inspec. Programs Roger D. Walker Comanche Peak Project Division Manager, Nuclear Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Texas Utilities Electric Company P. O. Box 1029 400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81 Granbury, Texas 76048 Dallas, Texas 75201 Regional Administrator, Region IV Texas Utilities Electric Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Bethesda Licensing 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 3 Metro Center, Suite 610 Arlington, Texas 76011 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Ms. Billie Pirner Garde, Esq.
William A. Burchette, Esq.
Garde Law Office Counsel for Tex-La Electric 104 East Wisconsin Avenue Cooperative of Texas Appleton, Wisconsin 54911 Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, D.C.
20007 Mrs. Juanita Ellis, President GDS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Citizens Association for Sound Energy Suite 720 1426 South Polk 1850 Parkway Place Dallas, Texas 75224 Marietta, Gecrgia 30067-8237 E. F. Ottney Jack R. Newman P. O. Box 1777 Newman & Holtzinger Glen Rose, Texas 76043 1615 L Street, NW Suite.1000 Washington, DC 20036 Mr. W. J. Cahill, Jr.
Chief, Texas Bureau of Radiation Control
. Executive Vice President, Nuclear Texas Department of Health Texas Utilities Electric Company 1100 West 49th Street 400 No. Olive Street, L.B. 31 Austin, Texas 78756 Dallas, Texas 75201 Honorable George Crump County Judge Glen Rose, Texas 76043
_