ML20245K499
| ML20245K499 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/27/1989 |
| From: | Edgeworth P, Rodehall T NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (FORMERLY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245K491 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1222-9, CON-NRC-02-87-004, CON-NRC-2-87-4 NUDOCS 8907050146 | |
| Download: ML20245K499 (7) | |
Text
AMENDMENT OF sot lCITATION/ MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT.
l3 j
2-
~~~~~
7 1.2/ AMUNOMENT/MOOsf eCAT 80N NO.
- 3. EFFCCTavE DAT E-
- 4. wCQUs5s T 40N/PUxCHA5E REW. NO.
5.PROJECY NO.(gr a, _3sej.
0 Thirty Six (36) 6/y)/#'/
NMS-87-004 c'td 4/13/89 cogg.
LAOM NenCRC m rusaumAn<in coggj.
l
- 6. issUCo uv.
\\
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
Division of Contracts & Property Management
-Washington, D.C.
20555 i
8, N AMC AND ADOHC55 OF CONT H AC 10f t (N... sitcci, C aly 6(.lf.Ad fl,' C.d(/
(/)
9A, AMONOMCNI~ OF SOLeCeTAT 80N NO.
Science' Applications International Corporation Environmental Technology Group-i
""^**'""'#"
1710 Goodridge Drive, MS G-6-1 Mc ean, VA 22102 loa. MOOtt SCAT 4ON OF CON T h4C1/OR OCH L
NO.
j, X
NRC-02-87-004.
nou.DATCDisErs m f ng 10/10/86 CODE lFACluTY CODE 11.THis ITEM ONLY APPLIESTO AMENOMENTSOF SJpCITATiONS.
is extended.,
is not em i
The above numt>sred solicitation is amended as set forth in atem 148. The hour and date specified for reaint of Offers tended.
g Of fers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended.by one of the follo copies of the arnendment: (bl By ackr.owledging receipt of rSis amendment on each copy of the offer 3
(al Oy compteting atems 8 and I5. and returning submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram whicts includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YO MENT TO DE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO Tite H IN FsEJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this aceendment you desire to change an offer already submitted,such change may be crude by tetter, provided each telegram or letier rnakes reference to the solicitation end this amendenent, and is reaived prior to the opening hour a
- 12. ACCoun14NG AND APPROPRB AlaQN DAT A fif wouired)
(
l B&R No.: 950-19-03-02 FIN No.: L1222-9 Obliaat9-t1 8.non nn
- 13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODll'ICATIONS OF' CONTRACTS / ORDERS, IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT / ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED lt!! ITEM 14 V3 N' NECS"On"o"C'n rIO N SSlYo'E *"*"^"' '"
'*### ""'"*'"*# '"' '"^"" * *
' '" # "[' "'
" ' " ' " ' ' ' " * * ^ " ' " ^
^
O. THC.ADOvC NuueCRED CONT R ACT/OROCst IS MODtF4CO TO' REFCCCT THC ADM
.ppr prisri.e d.fc. cic.) SET FOftTH IN ITCM 34 PUR$UANT TO THE AU1 HORITY OF FAR 43.103(t4 I
C.3 H45 SUDPLLMEN1 AL AG HLf. MENT R$ CNT C84CO INTO I'UR5U ANT T O AUT HOHIT Y OF Paragraph G.1 of the contrac.t am,,d oaraaraoh G.10 nf tho tnntrart X
1.. - -.,,...,-..
.........r
.r E. IMPORTANT Contractor O is oot. 8is<eaeircatosieinisooComenteaareto<o
- 2
. Copies 10 the issuing Of fice.
2
- u. OtsCnws,0N Or AucNO-Cu ri-OO,r,CA1,0N <O,s...r a sr vCr. uni. >.<.sina.. ius.s-e..s.<u.ri.nu.nr ua..uus m.uar sm ia iste.s This modification definitizes Task Order No.19 " Review of Pacific Sierra Nuclear Associates Ventilated Storage Cask System Topical Report" and provides additional funding under the i
contract.
9 1.
Pursuant to paragraph G.10, Task Orders, the contractor is authorized to perform Task Order No.19 in accordance with the contractor's proposal dated April 26, 1989, as revised by changed pges faxed on 6/8/89, and by telecon on June R1989, between Barbara Meehan, NRC, and Tom Rodehau, SAIC, wherein it was agreed to reduce indirect overheads from $78,998 to $78,356; G&A fro.m $15,991 to $15,867, Subcontractor from -
t
$24,856 to $20,641, M&S from $497 to $413, Other Direct Costs from $16,245 to $15,729.
i:
i Cm,,,. a,ngjgggg,12j,p,Mg,UdgyAjg,fthMgMW,c6 9Lhk..no. -e i-uu so.a
.-o. n u..
36A. HAMC AND T e TLC Or CONE 84ACl eNG OrreCCH (Typt.r Frea81 15 A. 8 4 AM4,,, AND 141 LC 08 isGNCs4 (Type.s p.ent/
THOAW 3 00DEHAu
& a m % u m c G e u ror,vc P ul J. Edgeworth ISO. C ON I Et nC 7 064 0+ # C OH I *sC. O AI C 58CN Li > 30 0. Urecr[O 51 10s Os-AwCsatC A 3 4,C. O A T C 5e G N LO I
,,.i.,,..,......M...g.o
% 9 /n,. ny [ b,5.....N, [
1,bw1 ko4 hkGN
. g,C...
O,,.,
STANDAHO FORM 30 sitCV.10-8 31 l
NSN *S40-o n-3 52 a070 30305 Petsc.itacd tsy CSA P84EveOu$ Cost EON Ur4U$AOLC r Aa < e Cramo 8907050146 890627 I
PDR CONTR
___; E g M -@7Hg@4 PNU
4,
'1 s
NRC-02-87-004 Modification No. 36 Page 2 of 2 Task Order 19 shall be in effect from the date shown in block 3 of the SF30 through October 10, 1989. The total cost ceiling of this task is
$212,746.00 of which $195,180.00 presents the total estimated cost and s
$17,566.00 represents the fixed fee.
individuals are considered to be essential to the succ J.
The followin U-performance.f this task order:
D.Prelewicz,S.Katsenelenbogen,D.fjfy,/
j INg A
Miynarczyk,*:&l Wimpey, J. Stokley, T. Albert, S. Mirsky, R.
r'4/t7h Stevers, A. Istar, 0.-Stahl.
The contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the-effort under the task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.1, Key Personnel.
2.
Under Section G - Contract Administration Data, Paragraph G.1, Contract Ceiling Amount, the second sentence is revisad.to read" "The amount of funds available for performance underthis contract is
$1,681,100.00."
It is estimated that the amount of $146,000.00 currently obligated will, cover performance of this task order through August 30, 1989.
NOTICE OF INCREMENTAL FUNDING Sufficient funds are not presently available to cover the totality of ' work required pursuant to this Task Order over its entire period of performance.
The balance of funds will be obligated by m' modification to this Task ~ Order, up to the~ full estimated amount subject to the availability of. funds. While it is the Government's intention to.
incrementally fund this. Task Order up to its' full estimated amount.over.its full period of performance, at no time will the Government reimburse the Contractor for costs incurred in excess of the then applicable level. of obligation.
At any time during the performance of this-Task Order, any work perforrned and cost incurred by the Contractor in excess of.this applicable level of obligation are accomplished at the sole risk of the Contractor.
Clause 52.232-22 " Limitation of-Funds" shall supersede Clause 52.232-20
" Limitation of Costs" until such time as this Task' Order is fully funded.
'All other terms and conditions, including:the eiling' amount of
$2,100.000.00, remain the same.
(
I SAIC TASK'19.50W TASK DESCRIPTION FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE REVIEW 0F PACIFIC SIERRA NUCLEAR ASSOCIATES VENTILATED STORAGE CASK SYSTEM TOPICAL REPORT TASK N0. 019 FIN L12229-
1.0 BACKGROUND
Pacific. Sierra Nuclear Associates (PSN) has submitted a Topical Report (TR)'for review for a ventilated storage cask (VSC) independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI)' design.
2.0 WORK REQUIRED This task is to provide assistance to the NRC in the safety, review'of the ISFSI
- design TR submitted by PSN.. The scope of the-review is prin6ipally based on 10 CFR Part 72. The review is a multidisciplinary activity culminating in written record that will clearly demonstrate the applicant's compliance with the requirements = and criteria.specified in'10 CFR Part 72.
The requirements of 10 CFR Part 72 will dictate the overall scope of the review. All evaluations performed by the Contractor'should be based upon fulfilling specific requirements and criteria established in Subparts.E and-F of 10 CFR Part 72. Within Division 3 Regulatory Guides there are applicable' methods acceptable to the NRC for implementing some 10 CFR Part 72 Requirements and criteria.
If adopted by.the applicant these. regulatory guides can be used to qualify discrete review areas.
Enclosed is the table of contents for the VSC ISFSI TR. For this task,' the contractor is not responsible for the review of Safeguards, Quality Assurance, Emergency Planning and Administration sections, but is responsible for all remaining areas.
The scope of this task does not include any participation ir a public hearing nor any additional' review effort that could evolve from such participation.
l l-2.1 STAFFING The principal investigators represent the technical expertise provided by the Contractor and provide' technical continuity during the entire review process.
They.should have professional credentials in the technical areas. assigned to them that will qualify them as expert witnesses for testifying at public hearings.
They should have a clear understanding of the depth of. review generally required by the NRC and specifically required by the type of activity proposed by the applicant for the disciplines they represent.
(
(
~_
i SAIC TASK' 19 S0W
' i In areas that can be best accomplished by less experienced personnel, the principal investigators may act as overseers, providing contractor quality control to task activities.
The reviewers will be responsible for a timely technical revice of discrete areas within the entire review effort.
Reviews van be performed by any qualified support staff member, but may be performed by a principal investigator or even by the project manager.
The reviewers who perform the actual work shall provide detailed' technical records of the methods used to evaluate all aspects of their areas of responsibility. Upon completion of an evaluation, the reviewer or responsible
]
principal investigator will distill this record to suitable documentation fbr l
inclusion in NRC reports.
l f
f 2.2 SCHEDULE The following schedule is based on estimates of time intervals to accomplish
)
steps in the review process through the NRC documentation st' ate. However, the J
overall schedule is dependent on the applicant's response to NRC requcsts for information and any outstanding concerns.
N J
Task Start-up and Coordination Meetings 2 weeks I
Complete Requests for Additional Information 6 weeks Complete Evaluation, Identifying Outstanding Concerns 6 weeks Complete Final Evaluation 6 weeks Discrete areas within task activity should be treated on the individual 4'
reviewer level.
If a discrete area of review is satisfied by the initial j
submittal from the applicant, its final evaluation and documentation should be completed in the early stages of the review and should not wait for the review steps required for a more difficult area.
3.0 Task Report Deliverables i
Two types of reports are required; reports on discrete areas of review and monthly reports identifying the overall progress of the task.
For each discrete review area, the Contractor shall provide details of the review l
method, requests for information in a form suitable to transmit to the l
applicant, and documentation summarizing the evaluation and findings suitable to include in NRC reports.
The last of these shall be submitted in draf t and final form.
Monthly reports shall be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions il I
of the basic contract.
^
(
- ~..
SAIC TASK 19 S6W 4.0 Travel It is expected that there will be monthly coordination meetings between the Contractor and ifRC staff throughout the duration of the task. This should be readily accommodated because of the proximity of the Contractor's offices and i4RC offices in Rockville, fiaryland.
If during the review process an area of review requires technical discussions between the Contractor and the applicant, the Contractor may be requested to attend meetings with the applicant.
It is anticipated this could involve three meetings at flRC's offices in Rockville, liaryland.
5.0 f1RC Furnished liaterials The flRC will furnish the Contractor copies of documents docketed under Project tio. 11-53.
6.0 Completion Date The desired completion date for this technical assistance tdsk is October 10, 1989.
If required, a separate task order will be initiated to utilize selected reviewers from this task in public hearings associated with this licensing action.
7.0 Technical Direction i
Keh Chun Leu is designated the litiSS Project 14anager. Technical instructions
)
may be issued from time to time during the duration of this. task. Technical 1
instructions shall not constitute new assignments of work or changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance.
Directions for changes in scope of work, cost, or period of performance will be
~g coordinated through the tiMSS Project Officer.
8.0 Level of Effort j
U The level of effort estimated to be needed to complete this task is 1 staff year.
Enclosures:
1.
TR Table of Contents F
i
(
(
\\
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1-1 1-3 1.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STORAGE C/SK.
1.3 IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS AND CONTRACTORS.........
1 18 1-18 1.4 GENERIC CASK AIUlAYS 1-18 1.5 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA.
2.0 PRINCIPAL DESIGN CRTI11RIA 2-1 2.1 IRRADIATED FUEL TO BE STORED.
2.2 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 21 AND NATURAL PHENOMENA.....................,
29 2.3 SAFETY PROTECTION SYSTEMS....
2.4 DECOMMISSIONING CONSIDERATIONS................
2-15 3.0 STRUCIURAL EVALUATION 3.1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN 3-1 3.2 WEIGHTS AND CENTERS OF GRAVITY................
32
~
3.3 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATF7TALS........
3-2 32 3.4 GENERAL STANDARDS FOR CASKS..
1 3-44 3.5 FUEL RODS............
4.0 THERMAL LWALUATION 4.1 D I S C U SS IO N.........................................
4-1 4-3 4.2
SUMMARY
OF THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS 4-3 4.3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF COMPONENTS.......
4.4 THERMAL EVALUATION FOR NORMAL STORAGE CONDITIONS.
4-7 5.0 SIIIELDING EVALUATION 5.1 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS....
5-1 5.2 SOURCE SPECIFICATION......................
5-1
5.3 DESCRIPTION
OF THE RADIAL AND AXIAL SHIELDING MODELS 5-4 SHIELDING EVALUATION..
59 6.0 CRITICALITY EVALUKITON 6-1 6.1 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS........
61 l
6.2 CASK FUEL LOADING..
i 6.3 MODEL SPECIFICATION 61 d4 CRITICALITY CALCULATION METHODOLOGY.
64 65 CRITICAL llENCHMARK EXPERIMENTS.
64 iii I
(
.(.-
q
' 7.0 CONFINEMENT t..'
7.1 CONFINEMENT BOUNDARY.............................. 1 7.'1 -
7 CO EMENT 1 QUI FOR IIYP AL A CIDEhh 7
-]
CONDFFIONS...................... -................
RO OPERNITNG PROCEDURES
-l
- ]
~ 8.1 PROCEDURES FOR LOADING THE CASK.......
81 J
8 )
8.2 PROCEDURES FOR UNLOADING THE CASK.........
8.3 PREPARATION OF A CASK FOR ON-SITE TRANSPORT......
8-5,'
8 8.4 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA......
4 9.0 ACCEL'rANCE TESTS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
)
9 9.1 ACCEPTANCE TESTS -.........................
9.2 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM '................
92 10.0 RADIAHON' PROTECTION l
10.1 ENSURING THAT OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURES ARE-10 1 AS LOW AS IS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE (ALARA) 10.2 RADIATION PROTECTION DESIGN FEATURES r;......
10-2 10.3 ESTIMATED ON-SITE COLLECTIVE DOSE ASSESSMENT 10 2 11.0 ACCIDENT ANALYSES 11.1 OFF-NORMAL OPERATIONS...............
11-1 11.2 ACCIDENTS.......................
11-9 12.0 ' OPERATING CONTROIS AND LIMrIS ia 12.1 PROPOSED OPERATINu CONTROLS AND LIMITS...
12-1 12.1 DEVEI.OPMENT OF OPERATING CONTROLS AND LIMITS L12-2
)
ll 13.0 QUALrrY ASSURANCE
14.0 REFERENCES
i VOLUME II (PROPRIETARY) i APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS
. APPENDIX 2 SPECIFICATIONS I
APPENDIX 3 FUEL REGION TIIERMAL CONDUCTIVITY APPENDIX 4 COMPlTIT:.R PROGRAM INPUT AND OUTPUT APPENDIX S OA PROGRAM i
APPENDIX 6 PROPRIIsrARY PAGES FROM VOLUME I i
Ii II
- I iv I
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _