ML20245J403

Notice of Violation from Insp on 890201-28.Violation Noted: Inoperable Fire Barrier,Failure to Lock Valve in Accordance W/Procedure & Failure to Update Drawing

ML20245J403
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	05/01/1989
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245J388	List: ML20245J384 ML20245J403 ML20245J425
References
50-482-89-05, 50-482-89-5, NUDOCS 8905040121
Download: ML20245J403 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

i l

{

, . 1

. i

)

A_PPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Docket: 50-482 Wolf Creek Generating Station License: NPF-42 During an NRC inspection conducted February 1-28, 1989, three violations of NRC requirements were identified. The violations involved an inoperable fire barrier, failure to lock a valve in accordance with procedure, and failure to update a drawing. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violations are listed below:

A. Inoperable Fire Barrier TS 6.8.1 requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained for, among other things, the fire protection program.

Procedure ADM 13-103, Revision 5, " Fire Protection: Impairment Control,"

implements procedures for impaired fire protection equipment including degraded fire barriers. ADM 13-103, Section 4, requires that fire protection impairment control permit forms be prepared for all fire protection system impairments and that entries be made in the fire protection impairment control log for the impairments.

Contrary to the above, on February 25, 1989, the NRC inspector identified an open, unsealed, 3/4-inch conduit located between Room 1326 (Fire Area A-14) and Room 1329 (Fire Area A-33) for which no fire impairment had been issued.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplements)(482/8905-01)

B. Failure to Lock a Valve in Accordance With Procedure TS 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established including the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Revision 2, dated February 1978. Appendix A of RG 1.33 states that equipment control (e.g., locking and tagging) should be covered by written procedures. Checklist A of AL-120, Revision 11,"

Auxiliary Feedwater Normal Lineup," requires, in part, that the handwheel to the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater (TDAFW) Pump Discharge Isolation Valve AL HV-012 be lockwired in the neutral position.

Contrary to the above, on February 8,1989, the NRC inspectors observed that AL HV-012 was not lockwired in the neutral position.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplements)(482/8905-02) g%u 35N2 l a

L-______-_______________ _

1 m

C. _ Failure to Update Drawing 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, i procedures, or' drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instruction, procedures, or. drawings. Licensee Administrative Procedure ADM 01-042, Revision 9, " Plant Modification Request Implementation," Step 5;4.5, requires color coding applicable control room drawings to indicate implementation progress, if a plant modification requestL(PMR) is partially implemented.

Contrary to the above, on February 28, 1989, the NRC inspector determined that Drawing M-12AL01(Q) was not color coded (" redlined") to reflect field implementation and partial closeout of PMR 00264 in December 1986.

This is a Seherity Level IV violation. (Supplement I) (482/8905-03)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if ddmitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlington, Texas this / g day of h ,

1989 C

l l

l 4

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .