Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1003, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors, Per Request. Suggests Specific Wording Included in App B Be Replaced W/More General Summary of Principle Items to Be AddressedML20245F570 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Davis Besse |
---|
Issue date: |
08/01/1989 |
---|
From: |
Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
---|
To: |
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
---|
References |
---|
RTR-REGGD-01.XXX, RTR-REGGD-1.XXX, TASK-DG1003, TASK-RE 1696, NUDOCS 8908140414 |
Download: ML20245F570 (2) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20198L1911998-12-21021 December 1998 Submits Comments Re Proposed Rule to Revise 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20198L1361998-12-15015 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint of NPP ML20217J2161998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of nuclear-grade Activated Charcoal ML20217F5361998-03-25025 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20199J4651998-01-22022 January 1998 Comment Opposing Draft RG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. RG Unnecessary Based on Use of EPRI Guideline & Excellent Past History of Commercial Grade Items at DBNPS ML20148M6421997-06-17017 June 1997 Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems.Nrc Should Review Info Provided in Licensee 970130 Submittal & Remove Statements of Applicability to B&W Reactors from Suppl Before Final Form ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997 Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy ML20133B6941996-12-18018 December 1996 Submits Ordinance 850-96 Re Approval of Merger of Centerior & Oh Edison Into Firstenergy ML20132A8461996-12-0202 December 1996 Resolution 20-1996 Supporting Merger of Ohio Edison & Centerior Corp Under New Holding Company Called Firstenergy ML20134M6191996-10-28028 October 1996 Proclamation of Support by City of Sandusky,Oh Re Merger of Ohio Edison and Centerior Energy Corp ML20108D9571996-05-0303 May 1996 CEI Response to City of Cleveland 2.206 Petition.Nrc Should Deny Petition ML20097G5731996-02-13013 February 1996 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide ML20097B8721996-01-23023 January 1996 Petition of City of Cleveland,Oh for Expedited Issuance of Nov,Enforcement of License Conditions & Imposition of Appropriate Fines,Per 10CFR2.201,2.202,2.205 & 2.206 ML20101B5841996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement Or,In Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures.W/Certificate of Svc ML20097B8911996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement or in Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures ML20096E9781996-01-0808 January 1996 Comment on Proposed Suppl to GL 83-11, Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses in Support of Licensing Actions ML20087J3611995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20086M8241995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20083M8701995-05-10010 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactor ML20081C8841995-03-0303 March 1995 Comment Re NRC Proposed Generic Communication Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Util Ack NRC Efforts to Reduce Scope of GL 88-20,but Believes That Proposed Changes Still Overly Restrictive ML20077M5831995-01-0404 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20072K3611994-08-16016 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Plans for Storage of Sf at Davis Besse NPP ML20072K4411994-08-14014 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Storage of Nuclear Waste at Facility in Toledo,Oh ML20072K5261994-08-12012 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of Standardized NUHOMS Horizontal Modular Storage Sys to List of Approved Sf Storage Casks ML20072B1581994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 on List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks:Addition ML20029D8221994-04-19019 April 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Codes & Stds for Nuclear Power Plants;Subsection IWE & Subsection Iwl ML20062M4011993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20046A9561993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. ML20056C8951993-07-19019 July 1993 Order Extending Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of LBP-92-32.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 930720 ML20045F8321993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Concurs W/Proposed Rule in Reducing Random Testing Rate of Licensees to 50% & Disagrees W/ Maintaining Random Testing Rate of 100% for Vendors ML20044E2781993-05-13013 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial ML20044E1561993-04-29029 April 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re Frequency Change of Emergency Planning Exercises ML20127L8781993-01-19019 January 1993 Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NUMARC Re Draft Reg Guide DG-1020 ML20127A6171993-01-0606 January 1993 Order.* Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of Board Order LBP-92-32,dtd 921118,extended Until 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930106 ML20126D5801992-12-23023 December 1992 NRC Staff Answer in Response to Petitions for Review Filed by Oh Edison Co,Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co,Toledo Edison Co & City of Cleveland.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126F6501992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of City of Cleveland,Oh,Intervenor,In Opposition to Petitions for Review of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Petitioners Petitions for Review Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126D5171992-12-23023 December 1992 City of Brook Park Answer to Petitions for Review.* Opposes Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Based on Fact That ASLB Decision in proceeding,LBP-92-32,adequately Addressed Issues Raised in Petitions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5461992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & Toledo Edison Co to Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Commission Should Deny City of Cleveland Petition.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5781992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of American Municipal Power-OH,Inc in Opposition to Petitions for Review of Oh Edison Co & Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co/Toledo Edison Co.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D4761992-12-22022 December 1992 Alabama Electric Cooperative Answer to Applicants Petitions for Review.* Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5461992-12-10010 December 1992 Order.* Requests That Answers to Petition for Review Be Filed No Later than 921223.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 921210 ML20126A5751992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review LBP-92-32, 921118 Board Decision in Proceeding.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underpinning of Statute.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5871992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review ASLB 921118 decision,LBP-92-32.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underplanning of Statute.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126A7651992-11-18018 November 1992 Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* City of Cleveland Petition for Review Should Be Granted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20115E1771992-10-0808 October 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Mgt Directive 8.6,GL 92-05 ML20105C8971992-09-16016 September 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication Re Generic Ltr Concerning analog-to-digital Replacements Under 10CFR50.59 ML20114A8841992-08-17017 August 1992 Designation of City of Brook Park,Oh of Adopted Portions of Summary Disposition Pleadings.* Brook Park Not Advancing Any Addl Argument or Analysis in Connection W/Designation,Per 920806 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20099E1821992-07-28028 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 61 Re LLW Shipment Manifest Info & Reporting ML20099A4051992-07-17017 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licensees.Supports Rules ML20101R4831992-07-0808 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl 1998-03-27
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20198L1911998-12-21021 December 1998 Submits Comments Re Proposed Rule to Revise 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20198L1361998-12-15015 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint of NPP ML20217J2161998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of nuclear-grade Activated Charcoal ML20217F5361998-03-25025 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20199J4651998-01-22022 January 1998 Comment Opposing Draft RG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. RG Unnecessary Based on Use of EPRI Guideline & Excellent Past History of Commercial Grade Items at DBNPS ML20148M6421997-06-17017 June 1997 Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems.Nrc Should Review Info Provided in Licensee 970130 Submittal & Remove Statements of Applicability to B&W Reactors from Suppl Before Final Form ML20097G5731996-02-13013 February 1996 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide ML20096E9781996-01-0808 January 1996 Comment on Proposed Suppl to GL 83-11, Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses in Support of Licensing Actions ML20087J3611995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20086M8241995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20083M8701995-05-10010 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactor ML20081C8841995-03-0303 March 1995 Comment Re NRC Proposed Generic Communication Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Util Ack NRC Efforts to Reduce Scope of GL 88-20,but Believes That Proposed Changes Still Overly Restrictive ML20077M5831995-01-0404 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20072K3611994-08-16016 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Plans for Storage of Sf at Davis Besse NPP ML20072K4411994-08-14014 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Storage of Nuclear Waste at Facility in Toledo,Oh ML20072K5261994-08-12012 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of Standardized NUHOMS Horizontal Modular Storage Sys to List of Approved Sf Storage Casks ML20072B1581994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 on List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks:Addition ML20029D8221994-04-19019 April 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Codes & Stds for Nuclear Power Plants;Subsection IWE & Subsection Iwl ML20062M4011993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20046A9561993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. ML20045F8321993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Concurs W/Proposed Rule in Reducing Random Testing Rate of Licensees to 50% & Disagrees W/ Maintaining Random Testing Rate of 100% for Vendors ML20044E2781993-05-13013 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial ML20044E1561993-04-29029 April 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re Frequency Change of Emergency Planning Exercises ML20127L8781993-01-19019 January 1993 Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NUMARC Re Draft Reg Guide DG-1020 ML20115E1771992-10-0808 October 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Mgt Directive 8.6,GL 92-05 ML20105C8971992-09-16016 September 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication Re Generic Ltr Concerning analog-to-digital Replacements Under 10CFR50.59 ML20099E1821992-07-28028 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 61 Re LLW Shipment Manifest Info & Reporting ML20099A4051992-07-17017 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licensees.Supports Rules ML20101R4831992-07-0808 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl ML20101R4791992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1021, Selection,Design, Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Emergency Diesel Generator Units Used as Class IE Onsite Electric Power Sys & Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20101R6211992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Rule ML20096E7861992-05-13013 May 1992 Comments on Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20095K6501992-04-27027 April 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guides DG-8010, Criteria for Monitoring & Methods for Summation of Internal & External Occupational Doses, & DG-8011, Radiation Dose to Embryo/ Fetus ML20092D2861992-02-0303 February 1992 Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting ML20086T8431991-12-26026 December 1991 Comment on Draft Reg guides,DG-8003,DG-8004,DG-8005 & DG-8006.Proposed Rev to Reg Guide 8.25 Recommends Specific Air Sampling Practices Not Suited to Commercial Power Reactor Industry ML20077C3701991-05-10010 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery ML20077A9391991-04-29029 April 1991 Endorses NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Codes & Stds for Nuclear Power Plants ML20070T6121991-03-15015 March 1991 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1009, Std Format & Content of Technical Info for Applications to Renew Nuclear Power Plant OLs & Associated Draft Srp.Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20070D5901991-01-30030 January 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Secy 90-347 Re Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20066B3031990-12-21021 December 1990 Comment Endorsing NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Response Data Sys ML20058H4381990-10-19019 October 1990 Comment Conditionally Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Scope of Environ Effects Concerning License Renewal Process ML20055F4351990-07-0606 July 1990 Comments on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Util Agrees That Revising Update Frequency to Following Refueling Outages Would Provide More Timely Reflection of Facility than Current Requirement ML20012C7531990-03-12012 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Util Endorses NUMARC & Nubarg Comments ML19332G5191989-12-0101 December 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Strongly Supports NUMARC Position.Nrc Should Consider Possible Alternatives for Addressing Objectives of Policy Statement ML20245F5701989-08-0101 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1003, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors, Per Request. Suggests Specific Wording Included in App B Be Replaced W/More General Summary of Principle Items to Be Addressed ML20246N5491989-07-0606 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plants Structures,Sys & Components. Mod to Existing Regulations Would Not Provide Most Effective Course of Action ML20246C8021989-06-19019 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20235V5571989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports NUMARC Position on Proposed Rule ML20206C8451988-11-10010 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Testing.Concurs W/Commissioner Roberts That Behavioral Observation by Trained Supervisors Will Detect Drug Abuser W/Less Intrusion of Privacy than Random Testing 1998-03-27
[Table view] |
Text
. . , . .. . . . --- , - - - -- -
g' '
t . j *h 7 N
', TOLEDO
. %ms EDISON--
_ e., c.,.,
DONALD C. SHELTON VICO PraSident-Nuclear
[419] E49-2300 Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3
' Ser' ial Number.1696..
r . August-1, 1989 Regulatory Publications Branch
. Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services Office of Administration and Resources Management United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
. Washington, D.-C. 20555 Subj ect: . Draft Regulatory Guide - Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors Gentlemen:
'The subject draf t Regulatory Guide (RG) is intended to provide licensees of nuclear reactors guidance concerning methods acceptable to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff for complying with-the requirements of
.recent amendments to 10CFR50 regarding the amount of funds required for
~
decommissioning and funding methods. Public comments are being solicited on the draft RG. Toledo Edison appreciates the opportunity to comment.
Toledo Edison's comments relate to Appendix B of the Guide, '.' Recommended Vording:for Financial Assurance Instruments." Appendix B provides specific wording for the various types of financial instruments which may be used to comply with the rule. While the Guide refers to the language of these examples as recommended, it specifies.that licensees "should use the recommended wording." This vould seem to imply that use of the recommended language vill be considered mandatory. Toledo Edison is concerned that this veuld. reduce flexibility to use existing financial instruments which Previously have been established to comply with state public utilities
. commission decommissioning fund requirements and otherwise satisfy 10CFR50.75.
Toledo Edison suggests that the specific wording included in Appendix B for each type of financial instrument be replaced with a more general summary of the principle items to be addressed. g l 8908140414 g90001 Y I PDR ADDCK 05000346 I p
! p COM
. THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO, OHlO 43652
- __xu _ _. - - - _ _ - _ _
3 , , . .
., [hekstLNusber50-346-
^ e,,F - ti'Licin2o Numbar NPF-3 lih ;( Serial Number 169(,
H
.^ Page J~
i >
[
s Toledo' Edison also notes that the Appendix B." Recommended Vording for Trust M .' Fund and Standby Trust Agreements" incorporates a reporting. requirement which'
- is not required;by'the rule. Specifically, a trustee who ir likely.not a NRC licensee, wouldlbe required to. ft"mish annually to the _ NRC, a statement confirming the value of the trust fund. Toledo Edison believes that'this
^
report, if.~it is desired by the NRC,'should be required by rule, not regulatory guidance. Such a report should be required only of licensees.and not third party trustees.
If you have any. questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. R. W. Schrauder, Nuclear Licensing Manager, at (419) 249-2366.
Very.truly.yours, ,
s f
PVS/dlm cc2 .P. M. Byron, DB-1 NRC Senior Resident Inspector
A. B.. Davis, Regional Administrator, NRC Region III T. V.: Vambach, DB-1 NRC Senior Project Manager e
_._Amm ___m___.___U- _