ML20245D882

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lake Creel Survey Summary Rept,1982 - 1986
ML20245D882
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Pallo M
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20245D782 List:
References
NUDOCS 8905010213
Download: ML20245D882 (68)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ - _ _ _ _ .

Attachment E l

Clinton Lake 1 Creel Survey Summary Report 1982 - 1986 s e f

C , ._ .)

prepared by ILUN0/3 POWER COMPANY Environmental Affairs Dept.

Field Biology Laboratory 1988

[gP:nsi f::f:Q.

h.

lt

{?

j _ . .-

CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY

SUMMARY

REPORT 1982-1986 Prepared by M. Stephen Pallo Illinois Power Company Environmental Affairs Department Field Biology Laboratory 1988 i

l l

i s

1 l

l l

1

- o

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Title iii LIST OF F1GURES................................................

l iv LIST OF TABLES.................................................. i 1

INTRODUCTION.................................................... ]

HETHODS AND MATERIALS...........................................

I 4

Sampling Schedule..........................................

4 >

Sampling Seetions.......................................... l

\

6 i Data Co11ection............................................  !

I Da ta Exp an sion and Pr ecision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4

7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..........................................

7 Angler Effort................................ .............

11 l Trip Length................................................  !

(

l 11 Angler littrvest.............................................

....... 16 White crappie...................................... q Blueg111................................................... 25 25 Black bu11 head.............................................

25 Black crappie..............................................

Largemouth bass........................................ ... 32 4 1

-)

32 Experimental SpJ t F1sh.................................... l l

35 Other Species..............................................

35 i

SUMMARY

AND CON CLU SION S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s

..........,.................. 38 REFERENCES C1TED......,...........

40 APPENDICES............................ ......................... ,

1 l

l l  !

1 1

11  !

i h"----____.__m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _

L .a e 1

1' L

LIST 0F FIGURES Number Caption Page

1. Map of Clinton' Lake, Illinois indicating public access boat' ramps and creel survey sampling sections used from 1982-1986...............................................- 2 2 Total annual angler effort, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986............................................... 9 3 Monthly angler effort by boat. anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986..................................... 13 j 4; Estimated monthly harvest of fish by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... 19 x

r' I

E I

s 111

1 l

', LIST OF TABLES j i

Number Title Page 1 Selected hydrological features of Clinton Lake, near Clinton, I111nois....................................... 3 2 Number of days sampled on weekends (including major holidays) and weekdays during the creel survey, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... 5 4

I 3 Coefficient of variation (CV) for angler effort,  ;

Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... 8

{

4 Estimated angler effort (hours / hectare) on weekends and weekdays, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986......... 10 l

5 Mean annual fishing pressure on several lakes in Illinois and surrounding states......................... 12 6 Monthly estimates of angler effort (hours / hectare)

Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... 14 7 Mean angler trip length at several selected Illinois .

1akes................................................... 15 8 Monthly estimates of the number of fishes harvested,  ;

95% confidence interval (CI), and percent coefficient of '

variation (CV) for boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986............................................... 17 9 Estimated annual harvest of fishes by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... la 3

1 10 Catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPE) and number of fishes harvested per hectare and per acre for several Illinois 1akes................................................... 20 I

) 11 Selected catch statistics for white crappie, caught by boat anglere. Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986......... 22 i l

12 Number per hectare (and acre) and pounds per acre of white crappie harvested from several Illinois lakes. ... . 23 15 Monthly estimates of the number of white crappie l harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-198(...................... ..... .................. 24 14 Selected catch statistics for bluegill harvented by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.............. 26 15 Estimated catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPE) and catch per hectare for bluegill from several lakes compared with Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986....................... 27 iv

I

, LIST OF TABLES

. Number Title Pg 16 Selected catch statistics for black bullhead harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986......... 28 17 Mean annual catch-per-unit-of-ef fort of black bullhead f rom seve ral Illinois 1ake s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 18 Selected catch statistics for black crappie harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986......... 30 19 Mean annual catch-per-unit-of-effort of black crappie from several Illinois 1akes............................. 31 20 Selected catch statisti,-s for largemouth bass harvested or released by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986............................................... 33 21 Estimated catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPE) and catch per hectare for largemouth bass from several lakes compared with Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.................. 34 i

V

INTRODUCTION Illinois Power Company (IPC) conducted a creel survey on Clinton Lake from 1978 through 1986 to assess fishing activities. This report summarizes creel data from 1982 through 1986. Angler interview data were statistically expanded to provide estimates of fishing activities, such as number and species of fishes harvested and released, time spent fishing, etc.

The sport fish community of Clinton Lake included several species common to central Illinois lakes: largemouth bass, bluegill, white crappie, black bullhead, and channel catfish. Several experimental sport fishes were stocked to assess their adaptability to a cooling lake and to diversify the fishery. These fishes were walleye, hybrid striped bass (striped bass x white bass), and tiger muskellunge (muskellunge x northern pike) (Smithson and Kurzawski 1982).

Description of Clinton Lake Clinton Lake (Figure 1) was constructed in central Illinois by IPC to provide cooling water for Clinton Power Station. The lake was formed by a dam downstream from the confluence of Salt Creek and North Fork. Normal pool was attained in May 1978. This resulted in a 1,981 hectare (4,895 acre) roughly V-shaped impoundment (Table 1). Average depth is 4.75 m I

(15.6 f t) and most of the 209 km (130 mi) of shoreliste is wooded. Most of l the timber was removed before filling, except in areas that became large l

Coves.

METHODS AND MATE 21ALS Stratified and non-uniform techniques were incorporated into a i

multiple access area creel survey to yield unbiased estimates of angling l effort and harvest (Malvestuto et al.1978; Malvestuto 1983). Creel 1

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

i a e e e o s a 1 (

i

. * (.

e kl e -

m N 3 2o g

e

< si 25 i

\1 EA T

M *# i 1 "a

\N US m@ a S ~s

g. -

t .

$> k c4 at -

40

- 48 e

Av' 63

. i f'1%

s

~

\

u >,

t oi. )

t is 8

@ l' s \

) e \

sz' t 1 &

g

  • \'

l

)

2

_ . . _ _ _ _ _ __ )

3 1:

t j .

Table 1. ' Selected hydrological features of Clinton Lake, near Clinton, Illinois, i

l^

1,'

Parameter.- Metric English Surface area '1,981 ha 4,895 a Average depth 4.6 m 15.2 ft Maximum depth 13.7 m 45 ft Shoreline' length 209 km 130 mi Storage capacity 9.15 x 10 73 m 74,200 acre-ft Watershed 2- 2 766.6.km 296 mi Shoreline development 13.2' 13.2 Normal pool elevation 210 m 690 ft i

.Iangth of-North Fork arm' 12.8 km 8 mi Length of Salt Creek arm 25.6 km 16 mi n

I 1

o f

3 i j

t effort was adjusted to account for temporal and spatial changes in fishing activities. The creel survey methods were statistically based to provide reliable estimates of expanded data (Carlander et al.1958) so the information could be used to assess fish management techniques. Precision of the estimates were statistically analyzed for accuracy.

Sampling Schedule Creel effort was equally divided between weekdays and weekends

.(included holidays) (Table 2) to reflect angling effort for Clinton Lake (Kurzawski 1984) and to provide reliabin estimates of harvest (Malvestuto 1983). Weekday samples were uniformly distributed among eligible days and weekend samples were randomly distributed.

One eight hour shift, randomly chosen, was sampled on each sampling day. Each eight hour shift was divided into two or three consecutive nonoverlapping sampling units, depending on the average number of daylight

hours. For example, when daylight averaged near 10 to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, two sampling units each four hours long were established; when daylight averaged near 14 to 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />, three sampling units each four hours long were established. When three sampling units were established, two consecutive units were randomly chosen, thus an early and late shif t resulted.

The number of sampling days per month was determined from anticipated angler effort. Several winter months were not sampled (Table

2) because sporadic fishing pressure provided statistically unreliable results (Kurzewski 1984).

,Sangling Sections The lake was divided into four or five sections to obtain representative samples of fishing ef fort and harvest (Figure 1). Five 4

Table 2 Number of days' sampled on weekends (including major holidays) and weekdays during the creel survey, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

,1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Total WE' WD .WE WD WE WD WE WD WE. WD WE WD JAN 2 4 3 .3 4 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 FEB 4 4 ~3 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 9 10 MAR 3 4 4 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 10 11 APR- 7 7 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 33 35 MAY 8 8 8 7 8 8 8' 8 8 8 40 39 JUN :8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 40 40

'JUL 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 5 5 32 32' AUG 6- 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 24 24 SEP- 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 5 4 4 27 26

-0CT 6 6 5 4 6 6 5 5 5 5 27 26 NOV 3 3 4 2 2 2 0- 0 0 0 9 7 DEC 3 3' 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 j

I q

l

' WE a we ekend 2

WD = weekday 1

1 5-

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _.- - - _ ___ _ _ _ ___- _ m

m L

sections were originally chosen but due to lack of use at Section 5, it h

L was merged with. Section 4. One section was sampled per scheduled day. The number of sampling days assigned to each section was determined from relative fishing effort probabilities calculated from previous creel surveys (adjusted for the deletion of a sampling section)' (Kurzawski 1984).

Sampling probabilities were: Section 1, 0.08; Section 2, 0.33; Section 3, 0.34; and Section 4,.0.25. Lake sections were uniformly assigned to sampling days.

Data Collection Sampling consisted of boat and bank angler interviews and counts.

Boat anglers were interviewed at boat ramps, i.e., completed fishing trips; bank anglers were interviewed while fishing, i.e., incomplete fishing trips. Data collected during angler interviews included number of anglers, time spent fishing, and the number of each fish species released and ha rve sted, Catch and release data included the number of fish larger and smaller than the legal size limits when applicable. Total lengths were recorded from a representative sample of harvested fishes.

An " instantaneous" count of englers was made by boat in *he section twice each day. The counting period was chosen by dividing each sampling unit into three equal, non-overlapping time intervals. One interval was randomly selected from each unit with selections adjusted to avoid angler counts on consecutive intervals. Angler counts were generally made within

one hour, i.e., instantaneous as suggested by Neuhold and Lu (1957).

During severe weather, methods were modified and angling activity was assessed by counting boat trailers parked at the access areas. During January through March and November 1984, angler counts were taken lakewide by truck or snowmobile because angling effort was low, boat ramps were 6

closed, or ice covered the. lake.

Data Expansion and P p ision Expansion of angler. interview and count data followed formulas from Malvestuto et al. (1978) and was similar to a previous survey (Kurzawski 1984). Effort, harvest, and release data were calculated for each month surveyed and summed for annual totals.

Precision of monthly effort and harvest estimates were evaluated by using 95% confidence intervals (CI) and coefficient of variations (CV).

The variance associated with each estimate was used to calculate CI and CV (Malvestuto et al. 1978). Confidence intervals were calculated using a t-statistic. The CV was used to provide a measure of precision associated with an estimate,'i.e., as CV or CI decreases, precision increases.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Angler Effort Effort of bank and boat anglers was combined without an effect on precision of effort estimates because of randomized creel sampling. The precision (CV) of monthly effort estimates was best from April through October (Table 3). Malvestuto et al. (1978) also found effort estimates to be most precise from April through October. A CV of less than 20%

indicated effort estimates were reliable.

Monthly effort estimates were summed to provide annual effort estimates. Annual angling effort (hours /hactare) on Clinton Lake was consistent during 1982 through 1984; effort increased considerably from 1984 through 1986 (Figure 2). Increased effort by boat anglers on weekends accounted for the majority of this increase (Table 4). Increased effort in i

.1985 and 1986 reflects more success at harvesting fish, primarily white {

j. crappie. Bank effort was low because of limited access to shoreline areas.  !

1 l

l J

7

(..

I ~

Table 3 Coefficient of. variation (CV) for angler ef fort, Clinton

> Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 JAN 41 28 45 -- --

FEB 30 28 47 -- --

MAR 22 52 61 - --

APR 12 20 IC 15 13 MAY 5 14 12 4 8 JUN 9 10 6 6 7 JUL' 10 11 7 8 20 t

'AUG. 10 9 13 18 17 i

SEP 7 15 11 10 10 OCT 15 19 15 17 12 <

f NOV 30 22 82 -- --

DEC 61 -- -- --

l

" Creel. survey not conducted. ,

l 1

8

270-

-660 263 (650) 260-

-640 250- -620 600 240-

-580 230-m 0 560 m W

<0 '

~ 220-g -540 8 s

_c W N

m 210- -520 $

O 5 E O

.c -500 "

v 200- -

L s O g -480 g 4 190- g W -460 g U

L ~

G 180-

~

-440 $

C

$ C 170- -420 169 (417) 160-

-380 150 150-(371) i 360 140 Numbers in parentheses 140- 138 are nours acre (346) 340

)

130 . , , , , 320 1982 1983 1964 1985 1986 Figure 2. Total annual angler effort, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

9

Table 4 Estimated angling effort (hours / hectare) on weekends and weekdays, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

Weekend Weekday Total Boat Bank Total Boat Bank Total Boat Bank Total 1982 67 16 83 50 14 64 119 31 150 1983 65 9 74 54 12 66 118 21 140 1984 58 15 73 51 14 65 109 28 138 1985 76 23 100 50 19 69 127 42 169 1986 118 27 144 99 19 118 217 46 263 1982-1986 sean 95 76 172 1

10

The five-year mean effort for Clinton Lake (172 hours0.00199 days <br />0.0478 hours <br />2.843915e-4 weeks <br />6.5446e-5 months <br /> / hectare) was considerably greater than the mean annual pressure from a nationwide sample of 103 reservoirs (76 hours8.796296e-4 days <br />0.0211 hours <br />1.256614e-4 weeks <br />2.8918e-5 months <br /> / hectare) (Jenkins and Morais 1971) and for many other reservoirs (Table 5).

Angling ef fort was generally greatest during May and June with a decreasing trend for other months (Figure 3; Table 6). Similar trends in angling effort have been consistently reported (Malvestuto et al.1978, 1979; McNurney and Dreier 1981; Degan et al.1982; Baker 1983). Creater angling effort during May and June coincides with increased catch of crappie and the beginning of the summer vacation season.

Weekends (including major holidays) comprised 55% of the mean annual estimated effort, thus the assumption that effort would be divided equally between weekends and weekdays was valid.

Trip Length Mean trip length for Clinton Lake anglers was consistent (range of 4.4 to 4.9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br />) and generally exceeded the trip length for several other Illinois reservoirs (Table 7). Angler trip length tended to increase from 1932 through 1986, probably due in part to the increase catch of white crappie.

Angler Harvest The Clinton Lake access area creel survey resulted in a substantial bias towards boat anglers, therefore harvest estimates were tabulated separately. This sampling bias was not unwarranted because boat anglers expend considerable effort fishing on Clinton Lake. Bank anglers are also restricted from fishing many areas of Clinton Lake due to lack of convenient access. For these reasons only boat harvest estimates will be discussed, however bank harvest data are presented in the Appendix.

11

Table 5 Mean annual fishing pressure on several lakes in Illinois and surrounding states.

Hours / Hours /

Lake, State hectare acre Reference Clinton Lake, IL 172 70 This report Lake Springfield, IL 100 41 Heidenger et al.1984 Sangchris Lake, IL 167 68 McNurney and Frakes 1979 Sangchris Lake, IL (1987) 216 87 IDOC 1988 Sangchris Lake, IL (1984) 132 54 IDOC 1988 Rend Lake, IL 40 16 Heidenger et al. 1984 Newton Lake, IL 211 85 Bruce 1988 Coffeen Lake IL 142 57 IDOC 1988 Lake Shelbyville IL 110 45 IDOC 1988 Baldwin Lake, IL 94 38 IDOC 1988 Carlyle Reservoir, IL 18 7 IDOC 1988 Heidecke Lake, IL 189 77 IDOC 1988 Selected reservoirs, NC, SC 8-191 (range) 3-77 Baker 1983 Sinclair, GA 133 54 Baker 1983 Cherokee, TN 60 24 Baker 1983 Dale Hollow, TN 36 15 Baker 1983 West Point Reservoir, GA 7 3 Malvestuto et al. 1983 Cutfoot Sioux, MN 140 57 Osborn and Schupp 1985 Nationwide Sample 76 31 Jenkins and Morais 1971 12

-O

-m

-G Q m

-' m

.n m

-E

-G e

-O co cn H

-m I I

-a m y en I -, m, m

-, m m

-C l C

-a m H

H

-o .

Q

-In y n

1

-C g.

CO C

-n & O

-, m y e4

-C O

-c ,

M

. k 0

I-o w C

-m 4

~C sJ m

-, m 8

@ .o

-, m h

.a

-e

-C (O 0

-o

- tA y

-" cu  !?

-7 CO c

-, ~ p l a

- l~

~

g "

h$

n E

~

g (sano4-JeI6 ue) jao333 Ieloi H LLe

~ - - - . - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _

Table 6 Monthly estimates of angler ef fort (hours / hectare),

Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Mean APR 19 14 14 22 Si 24 MAY 31 34 36 49 82 46 JUN 27 36 25 28 38 31 JUL 20 15 19 18 20 18 AUG 20 11 15 18 24 18 SEP 11 11 12 17 21 14 OCT 13 11 11 15 25 15 14

Table 7 Mean angler trip length at several selected Illinois lakes.

Mean Trip Length Lake Year (hours)

Clinton Lake 1982 4.4 1983 4.6 1984 NC" 1985 4.7 1986 4.9 Clinton Lake 1982-1986 4.7 b

Baldwin Lake 1979 3.7 Carlyle Reservoir 1966 3.7 1967 4.4 1968 4.9 Heidecke Lake 1981 4.7 1982 3.8 1984 4.9 1985 3.9 Heidecke Lake 1981-1985 4.3 Lake Shelbyville 1972 3.9 "Not calculated Data except for Clinton Lake from IDOC 1988.

15

Precision of boat harvest estimates was generally best (i.e., CV less than 30%) from April through October for all years (Table 8). In several instances, CV exceeded 30%, and the 95% CI's were large. These less precise harvest estimates occurred in April (1982 and 1983) and August (1984 and 1985) when catch of white crappie was low and generally sporadic.

Total estimated harvest by boat anglers increased each year (Table 9) due to the increased harvest of white crappie. Harvest in 1986 during any month creeled (except August) was greater than the total harvest for 1982.

Harvest in May 1986 was also greater than the annual estimated harvest for 1983 or 1984. April, May, and June were typically the months that anglers harvested the most fish (Figure 4). Harvest generally declined during the summer months and increased somewhat in the fall.

Annual catch-per-unit-of-ef fort (CPE) increased steadily from 1982 through 1985 and leveled off in 1986 for boat anglers. Clinton Lake CPE for fish harvested generally exceeded values for a national sample (0.85, Jenkins and Morais 1971) and for several other reservoirs in Illinois (Table 10).

Harvest per hectare can also be used to compare the fisheries of dif ferent lakes. Rarvest from Clinton Lake was low in 1982 when compared to other lakes (Table 10); however, from 1983 through 1986 harvest was generally greater than other Illinois reservoirs. In 1985, the Clinton Lake harvest far exceeded other lake's harvest primarily due to harvest of white crappie.

White crappie White crappie were the primary fish harvested by boat anglers (94% of the total) (Table 9). Annual harvest increased in each successive year 16

1 3 9 8 6 2 4 0, 0, 0, 9, 6, 0, 8, 1 6 6 2 8 2 1 5 6C 3 4 1 4 2 5 1 8 1 1 9

1 t 1 2 6 6 2 2 0 9 s 3 2 2 1 0 5 6 7

. e 4, 9, 0, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0, 6 v 8 r 7 4 5 8 1 8 0 7 9 a 9 1 3 4 3 4 5 2 d1 H 2 5 n-a2 8

,9 V - - 8 8 0 8 0 0 8 - -

) 1 I

C - - - 2 2 2 5 2 2 - -

C ,

( s 2 6 1 8 8 4 2 i 1 0 5 5 7 3 6 l o I 9, 2, 3, 4, 1, 9, 1, aa 5C

- 2 8 ! 6 1 2 5 0 4 1 r1 9 3 3 1 4 1 1 e1 1 t 1 n t " 5 1 0 8 1 5 8 8 i ,

s 1 2 5 2 9 5 3 - 9 e e ek ca v

r

- 9 4, 4, 8

9, 8

6, 8

2, 4

1, 2

9, 6

7, 8

nL a 5 8 2 3 3 1 6 e H 1 3 d n io f t nn 0 0 2 5 8 5 8 7 1 4 1 oi V 8 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 0 cl C 1 C

5 , 0 0 3 2 0 4 0 1 1 0 6 9 s 6 1 5 8 3 7 7 0 6

,re 4C I 6 7, 9, 0, 9, 7, 3, 8, 2, dl 8 1 7 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 eg 9 2 1 1 1 2 t n 1 s a e t 0 0 2 0 9 0 6 9 7 6 0 9 vt s 9 4 4 3 6 2 4 5 9 9 ra e 2 0, 8, 9, 1, 0, 3, 9, 8, 4, ao v hb r 4 9 8 7 2 9 4 5 2 a 1 5 3 2 2 8 sr H 1 eo hf s

i) V 4 0 6 2 9 2 9 7 5 1 0 -

f V C 8 4 3 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 -

C f(

o 4 0 4 4 9 7 3 9 1 0 0 n 8 6 0 4 6 5 3 9 7 9 ro I 4 3 5, 6, 8, 3, 2, 5, 5, 4, ei 3C bt 81 7 7 0 6 2 2 6 0 ma ui 9

1 1 2 1 1 nr a t 9 0 3 3 0 0 4 2 5 3 2 1 ev s 0 1 6 4 1 8 9 9 4 3 - 8 h e 2 3 0, 8, 0, 6, 4, 1, 6, 8, - 2, tf v -

o r 0 2 4 9 3 3 6 8 9 f a 1 4 4 1 3 ot H 1 n

se ei t c V O 0 0 4 5 1 3 9 5 7 4 2 ai C 6 6 1 2 2 2 2 2 8 8 d mf e if t t e O 0 1 2 3 6 5 2 0 2 4 2 c

_ s o I 4 7 1 1 4 2 9 1 2 3 u ec 2 C 0, 6, 9, 4, 0, 9, 0, 3, 4 d 81 n yt 9 2 2 2 1 3 1 6 1 o l n 1 c h e t c t 0 0 3 3 6 7 4 0 6 3 0 1 3 t nr s 2 5 5 9 4 1 5 1 7 9 1 o oe e 4, 2, 2, 8, 5, 4, 6, 5 1 2, n Mp v r 1 8 6 2 4 3 9 7 g

_ a 3 n 8 H i l

e l p l a m b N B R R Y. N L G P T V C t a a A E A P V U U U E C O E o S

_ T J F M A I J J A S O N D T

  • O jI j

Table 9 Estimated annual harvest of fishes by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

Species 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Total  %

a Tiger muskellunge 140 49 0 168 107 464 Common carp 1,384 899 518 849 1,550 5,200 --

Bigmouth buffalo 0 0 12 0 0 12 --

Black bullhead 1,924 1,782 482 1,920 8,416 14,524 1 Yellow bullhead 327 85 30 80 0 522 --

Channel Catfish 613 786 469 749 3,029 5,646 --

Flathead catfish 17 0 0 0 0 17 --

Hybrid striped bas 175 25 156 249 673 1,278 --

Lepomis sp. 0 0 0 0 234 234 --

Green sunfish 101 849 502 385 239 2,076 --

Bluegill 4,437 1,704 1,503 5,794 11,828 25,266 2 Hybrid sunfish 6 0 32 0 0 38 --

Smallmouth bass 0 0 0 0 28 28 --

Largemouth bass 2,366 1,553 261 1,403 408 5,991 --

White crappie 24,323 129,509 177,553 354,524 495,311 1,181,220 94 Black crappie 135 1,259 819 2,420 3,670 8,303 1 Walleye 1,099 702 142 142 1,512 3,597 --

! Freshwater drum 166 79 20 115 74 454 --

TOTAL 37,213 139,281 182,499 368,798 527,079 1,254,870 "Less than 1%

18

l1l!l!

0

.S

.A 6 .

8 6

.J 8 9 9 1 1

.J -

2

.N 8 9

.A 1 s

i 0 o n

.S i l

.A l 5 I 8

.J 9 ,

1 e

.J k a

.N L

.A n

o t

n i

0 l C

.S ,

s

,A 4 r 8 e

,J l 9 g

.J 1 n a

.M t a

.A o b

y 0

b h

.S s i

.A f 3

8 f

.J 9 o

.J 1 t s

.N e vr

.A a h

y

) 0 l h

t

.S n o

- .A 2 m

.J 8 d 9 e

.J 1 t a

D- .M

.A i

E m

t s

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 0

0 0

8 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 e 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 r u

g OW m*[mI rm.' 4O tmO.$z

. i F

G

!l!l !l l' ,'

Table 10 Catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPE) and number of fishes harvested per hectare and per acre for several Illinois lakes.

Number /

Lake Year (s) CPE" hectare Reference b 19 (8)" This report Clinton Lake 1982 0.16 1983 0.59 70 (28) 1984 0.84 92 (37) 1985 1.47 186 (75) 1986 1.23 266 (108)

Clinton Lake 1982-1986 0.92 127 (51)

Newton Lake 1987 0.75 127 (51) Bruce 1988 Rend Lake 1979 1.06 43 (17) Heidinger et al.1984 Lake Springfield' 1979-1982 0.50 50 (20) tIeidinger et al. 1984 Coffeen Lake 1987 0.42 59 (24) IDOC 1988 Lake Sangchris 1987 0.44 95 (38) IDOC 1987 1984 0.38 50 (20) IDOC 1987 1973-1975 0.41 89 (36) McNurney & Dreier 1981 Lake Shelbyville 1987 0.41 45 (18) IDOC 1988 Baldwin Lake 1979 0.57 54 (22) IDOC 1988 Carlyle Reservoir 1967-1968 1.06 19 (8) IDOC 1988 11eidecke Lake 1981-1985 0.21 40 (16) IDOC 1988 Crab Orchard Lake 1978 1.26 105 (43) USFWS 1978 National average --- 0.85 63 (26) Jenkins & Morais 1971 humberoffishharvestedperanglerhour Boat englers only Number per acre 20

particularly with increases in 1983, 1985, and 1986. This increase in harvest occurred for two reasons: angler effort increased (Figure 2), and crappie from several strong year classes were attaining sizes that would be acceptable to anglers (Pallo 1987; Lutterbie, 1988). In 1983 and 1985 crappie from the 1979 and 1980 year classes likely made up a considerable N

portion of the harvest. In 1986, crappie from the 1984 year class were large enough to contribute substantially to the fishery.

Angler effort declined slightly from 1982 through 1983, yet CPE (number / hour) increased (Table 11). In 1985, effort increased but harvest 2

increased even more, resulting in a much greater CPE. However, in 1986 CPE declined slightly because harvest did not increase in proportion to effort.

Good year classes of white crappie were produced in 1984, 1985, 1986, and 1987 (Pallo 1987; Lutterbie 1988) and these year classes should sustain the fishery for several years.

Annual boat angler harvest of crapple increased from 12/ hectare in 1982 to 250/ hectare in 1986 (Table 12). Harvest of white crappie at other Illinois reservoirs was much less, except for Newton Lake in 1987 (230/ hectare; Table 12).

Most white crappie were harvested in April and May (57% in total; Table 13). During any given year, most crappie were usually harvested in May; exceptions were in October 1982 and June 1983.

Mean total length of harvested crappie tended to increase from 1982 through 1986 and leveled off at 8.9" (227 mm) (Table 11). The percent of

~

crappie greater than 9" in length generally increased from a low of 27% in 1982 to 61% in 1986. There mean TL's were in the preferred length category (Gablehouse 1984). Anglers kept 20% of the crappie caught in 1982; in ,

1985 and 1986 anglers kept 50% of the crappie caught. Total biomans of 21

Table 11 Selected catch 6tatfstics for white crappie, caught by boat englers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

Species Catch statistics 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 White crappie Number harvested 24,323 129,509 177,253 354,524 495,311 Total effort (hours) 235,244 234,425 216,206 251,250 429,402 CPE" (number / hour) 0.1 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.2 Number / hectare 12.3 65.4 89.6 179.0 250.0 Number / acre 5.0 26.5 36.3 72.5 101.2 Mean TL (mm) 211 221 218 227 227 Mean TL (inches) 8.3 8.7 8.6 8.9 8.9 Percent harvested greater than 230 mm (9 inches) 27 40 36 45 61 Founds / acre 2.0 9.7 11.9 25.3 37.2 Percent of total catch released 79 71 63 50 51 a

l Catch per unit of effort Total length 22

l-l f ..

f' L

Table 12 - Number per hectare (and acre) and pounds per acre of white crappie harvested from several Illinois lakes.

l- Number / Pounda/

Lake. Year hectare acre Reference l

l Clinton Lake

  • 1982 12 (5) 2.0 This report 1983 65 (26) ~ 9.7 1984- 90 (36) 11.9 l

l 1985 179 (72) 25.3 1986 250 (101) 37.2 Clinton Lake 1982-1986 119 (48) 17.2 Lake Springfield 1979 6 (2) 0.7 Heidinger et al. 1984 1980 32 (13) 3.4 Heidinger et al.1984 1981 25 (10) 3.5 Heidinger et al. 1984 1982 5 (2) 0.1 Heidinger et al. 1984 Coffeen Lake 1987 99 (40) 1.4 IDOC 1988 Lake Sangchris 1984 17 (7) 1.1 IDOC 1988 Lake Sangchris 1987- 2 (1) 1.2 IDOC 1988 Newton Lake 1987 230 (93) 21.3 Bruce 1988 Lake Shelbyville 1987 20 (8) 3.5 IDOC 1988 Rend Lake 1979 8 (3) 1.2 Heidinger et al. 1984 1980 6' (2) 0.6 Heidinger et al.1984 1981 10 (4) 1.1 Heidinger et al. 1984 1982 11 (4) 1.2 Heidinger et al. 1984 Boat anglers only Number per acre 23

Table.13 Month 1y' estimates of- the number of white crappie harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois 1982-1986, 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Total.  %

  • b JAN O 209 0- -- --- 209 tr 0 0- 0 --- --- 0 0 FEB.

MAR 0 280 292 -- -- 572 tr APR 1,217 9,788 13,924 58,331 93,959 177,219 15 l

MAY 4,973 40,391 59,263 185,216 204,174 494,017 42 1,335 40,486 37,294 25,750 26,072 130,937 11 JUN JUL 1,124 8,036 6,035 6,272 43,106 64,573 5 AUG 2,769 2,337 1,766 31,725 28,813 67,410 6 SEP 2,848 2,628 28,902 31,080 48,635 114,093 10 9,296 16,544 24,232 16,150 50,552 116,774 10 OCT 570 8,810 5,845 --- --- 15,225 1 NOV' 191 --- --- -- --- 191 tr

'DEC TOTAL 24,323 129,509 177,553 354,524 495,311 1,181,220

" Harvest not estimated trace (i.e., less than 1%)

24

harvested crappie also increased annually from 2.0 pounds / acre in 1982 to l' 37.2 pounds / acre in 1986. The 1985 and 1986 harvests were considerahiy greater than other Illinois lakes (Table 12).

L Bluegill Bluegill were the second most harvested fish (2% of total) by boat anglers, (Table 9). Harvest generally declined from 1982 through 1984, then increased considerably in 1985 and 1986 (Table 14). Mean total length of bluegill was small, i.e. less than the preferred size category of Cablehouse (1984). Annual boat angler harvest for Clinton Lake was well within the range of harvest rates (number per hour and number per hectare) for other Illinois lakes (Table 15).

Black bullhead Blach L 11 head was the third most harvested fish (1% of total) by boat anglers (Table 9). Harvest (i.e., total numbers, CPE, and number per hectare) was similar during 1982 and 1983, declined in 1984, then greatly increased through 1986 (Table 16). Bullhead harvest in Clinton Lake was greater than in Rend Lake and Lake Springfield but less than in several other large Illinois lakes (Table 17). Black bullhead may be considered an incidental harvest species particularly in large lakes as few anglers sought them in Lake Springfield and Rend Lake (Heidinger 1984). I Black crappie Black crappie was the fourth most harvested fish (1% of total) by boat ,

-l anglers (Table 9). Harvest was low in 1982 through 1984, then increased in i 1985 and 1986 (Table 18). Black crappie harvested in Clinton Lake was greater than in Lake Springfield but less than in several large Illinois lakes (Table 19).

25

i i

i i

l l

l

~

l Table 14 Selected catch statistics for bluegill harvested by 1 boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986. {

Species Catch statistics 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Bluegill Number harvested 4,437 1,704 1,503 5,794 11,828 Total effort (hours) 235,244 234,425 216,206 251,250 429,402 CPE" (number / hour) 0.019 0.007 0.007 0.023 0.028 Number / hectare 2.2 0.9 0.8 2.9 6.0 Number / acre 0.9 0.4 0.3 1.2 2.4 Mean TLb (mm) 151 153 149 168 162 Hean TL (inches) 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.6 6.4 a

catch-per-unit-of-effort Total length 26

__ ___ ___-________________ - _ _ a

t-l.

! Table 15 Estimated catch per-unit-of-effort (CPE) and catch per hectara for bluegill from several lakes compared with Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

Number /

Lake Year CPE" hectare Re ference b 2.2 (0.9)# This report Clinton Lake, IL 1982 0.019 1983 .0.007 0.9 (0.4) 1984 0.007 0.8 (0.3) 1985 0.023 2.9 (1.2) 1986 0.028 6.0 (2.4)

Cof feen Lake, IL 1987 0.050 7.1 (2.9) IDOC 1988 Sangchris Lake, IL 1987 0.080 17.2 (7.0) IDOC 1988 1984. 0.005 0.7 (0.3) IDOC 1988 1973-1975 0.100 23.5 (9.5) McNurney & Dreier 1981 Lake Shelbyville,. IL 1987 0.060 6.7 (2.7) McNurney &- Dreier 1981 s

Rend Lake, IL 1979-1982 0.658 16.1 (6.5) Heidinger et al. 1984

. Lake Springfield, IL 1979-1982-0.018 6.0 (2.4) Heidinger et al.1984 Newton Lake, IL 1987 0.005 0.8 (0.3) Bruce 1988 Thomas Hill, MO 1968-1972 0.017 0.8 (0.3) Hanson 1974

. " Number of fish harvested per. angler hour Boat anglers only

" Number per acre 27 i

4 i

? Table .'16FSelected catch 'statistica for black bullhead harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

-Species. . .

' Catch statistics 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 i;

Black bullhead -

Number harvosted- 1,924 1,792 482 2 1,920 8,416

!' Total effort' (hours) 235,244 234,425 216,206 251,250 429,402 CPE" (number / hour) 10.008 0.007 0.002 0.007 0.019-Number / hectare 1.0 0.9 0.2 1.0 4.2 Number / acre 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.7 J

r i

y I 5 f

L; i

28

l l

l 3

I Table 17 Hean annual catch-per-unit-of-effort of black bullhead from several Illinois lakes.

Mean annual Lake Year CPE" Reference Clinton Lake- 1982-1986 .009 This report Rend Lake 1979-1982 .004 HeidinEer et al.1984 Lake Springfield 1979-1982 .004 Heidinger et al. 1984 CarlyJe Reservoir 1967-1968 .415 IDOC, 1988 Heidecke Lake 1981-1982 1984-1985 0.091 IDOC, 1988 ,

1 Lake . Shelbyville 1972 .015 IDOC, 1988 Lake Sangchris 1973-1974 0.075 McNurney and Dreier 1981

" Catch-per-unit-of-effort i

1 1

29

1 l'

l l Table 18 Selected catch statis0ics for black crappie harvested by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986 Species Catch statistics 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Black crappie Number harvested 135 1,259 819 2,420 3,670 <

Total effort (hours) 235,244 234,425 216,206 251,250 429,402 CPE" (number / hours) 0.001 0.005 0.004 0.010 0.009 Number / hectare 0.07 0.64 0.41 1.22 1.85 Number / acre 0.03 0.26 0.17 0.49 0.75 "Ca tch-p er-unit-o f-e f fort 30

i 1

I 1

l Table 19 Mean annual catch-per-unit-of-effort of black crappie from ,

several Illinois lakes. l l

i i

Mean annual Lake Year CPE" Reference Clinton Lake 1982-1986 0.006 This report Rand Lake 1979-1982 0.030 Heidinger et al.1984 Lake Springfield 1979-1982 0.002 Heidinger et al.1984 Baldwin Lake 1979 0.009 IDOC 1988 Lake of Egypt 1982 0.260 IDOC 1988 Heidecke Lake 1981 0.012 IDOC 1988-

" Catch-per-unit-of-effort 31

Largemouth bass Largemouth bass were the fifth most harvested fish by boat anglers j

(Table 9). Harvest generally declined from 1982 through 1986. Anglers were most successful at catching bass during several summer months, however l August proved to be the best month overall (Table 20). Annual CPE of bass harvested by boat anglers generally declined except for 1985. Harvest per hectare was best in 1982 (Table 20). Harvest per hectare and CPE vere much However, less than other Illinois lakes or a natioral mean (Table 21).

harvest rates were probably lowered due to catch and release fishing.

Clinton Lake anglers released 46 to 85% of the legal size (potentially harvestable) bass. In other studies voluntary release of more than 10% of the legal size fish can change the interpretation of harvest data (Clark 1983).

Experimental Sport Fish Harvest of experimental sport fishes, i.e. walleye, hybrid striped bass, and tiger muskellunge was low (Table 9). Populations of these fishes are maintained by stocking as significant reproduction is not expected.

The low occurrence of these fish in the creel lowered the precision of harvest estimates, therefore only a qualitative discussion will follow.

Among these experimental fish, walleye were harvested most often.

Harvest of walleye declined from 1982 through 1985 then increased in 1986 (Table 9). Walleye were more available for harvest in 1982 because of the extremely good year class from the original stocking of the lake in 1978.

Less harvest from 1983 through 1985 reflects weaker year classes and harvest from previous years. Increased harvest in 1986 reflects stronger year classes for 1983 and 1984.

Harvest of hybrid striped bass was low but increased in 1986 (Table 32

Tab 1'e 20 Selected catch statistics for largemouth bass harvested

, or r'eleased by boat anglers, Clinton Lake, Illinois,

.1982-1986.

Species

' Catch statistics 1987 1983 1984 1985 1986 Largemouth bass Number harvested 2,366 1,553 261 1,403- 408' L Total effort (hours) 235,240 234,425 216,206 251,250 429,402

.CPE" (number / hour) 0.010 0.007 0.001 0.006 0.002 Number / hectare 1.19 0.78 0.13 0.78 0.21 Number / acre 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 Mean TLb (mm). 389 400 391 420 396 Mean TL (inches) 15.3 15.7 15.4 16.5 15.6 Best month

  • Aug Jul Sep Aug/Sep Aug Percent of total catch released 88 88 98 92 98 Percent of legal size released 46 66 77 57 85 b

Catch-per-unit-of-effort Total length "As determined by CPE for all sizes of fish caught

)

I I

I l

I 33 1

l l

Table 21 Estimated catch-per-unit-of-ef fort (CPE) and catch per hectare for largemouth bass from several lakes compared with Clinton Lake, Illinois, 1982-1986.

Number / j Lake Year CPE" hectare Reference b 1.19 (0.5)* This report Clinton Lake, IL 1982 0.010 1983 0.007 0.78 (0.3) 1984 0.001 0.13 (0.1) 1985 0.006 0.78 (0.3) 1986 0.002 0.21 (0.1)

Coffeen Lake, IL 1987 0.12 16.99 (6.9) IDOC 1988 Sangchris Lake, IL 1987 0.08 17.25 (7.0) 1D00 1988 1984 0.034 4.49 (1.8) IDOC 1988 1973-1975 0.078 14.77 (6.0) McNurney & Dreier 1981 Newton Lake, IL 1987 0.027 4.56 (1.8) Bruce 1988 Rend Lake, IL 1979-1982 0.032 0.95 (0.4) Heidinger et al. 1984 Lake Springfield, IL 1979-1982 0.013 1.10 (0.4) Heidinger et al. 1984 Thomas Hill, MO 1968-1971 0.20 8.59 (3.5) Hanson 1974 National mean --- 0.17 --- Holbrook 1975 j Number of fish harvested per angler hour b

Boat anglers only Number per acre J l

i i

l l

34

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - - .- - - I

, a h

9). -This harvest increase was attributed to a good 1983 year class which became legal size in.1986.

Tiger muskellunge were stocked to provide a trophy fish for anglers, f'

therefore ' harvest was expected to be low (Table 9). One line class world record was established in 1985 from Clinton Lake (National Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame 1985).

Other Species Harvest of other species was low (Table 9). Harvest was rather constant for common carp, green sunfish, and freshwater drum. Harvest tended to increase for channel catfish. Harvest of other species was incidental.

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS Data (angler effort and fish harvest) derived from the Clinton Lake creel survey were statistically reliable particularly during April through October.

Fishing pressure on Clinton Lake was twice the national average and exceeded most other large reservoirs in Illinois. Fishing pressure for Clinton Lake was relatively low from 1982 through 1984, then increased substantially through 1986 due to the increased harvest of white crappie.

. Ihe. effort was about equally distributed between weekdays and weekends and was greatest during May and June. Similar distributions of effort are commonly reported for other lakes.

Total estimated harvest by boat anglers increased each year, with substantial increases in 1985 and 1986. The CPE from 1984 through 1986 equalled or exceeded the national average and was greater than most other large Illinois reservoirs. The five-year mean CPE and number of fish harvested per hectare from Clinton Lake also exceeded data from other large 35

l l l t

Illinois reservoirs. Mean trip length on Clinton Lake was similar to other l large Illinois reservoirs.

1 White crappie (94%), bluegill (2%), black crappie (1%), and black bullhead (1%) were the primary fishes (i.e., greater than 1%) harvested by boat anglers. Walleye, hybrid striped bass, and tiger muskellunge, i.e., i the experimental species, were not harvested extensively; however, if strong year classes are maintained harvest should increase.

White crappie comprised the majority of the harvested fish. White  !

crappie CPE increased from 1982 through 1985, then slightly declined in 1986. Harvest in terms of size (mean total length) increased from 1982 through 1986 and so did the number of pounds per hectare. Mean harvest by I

weight was more than most other Illinois reservoirs. Most crappie were harvested in April and May. Substantial numbers of fish smaller than anglers preferred were released.

Bluegill were the second most harvested fish. Harvest declined from 1982 through 1984, then increased in 1985 and 1986 when fish size was more acceptable to anglers. Bluegill harvest was within the ranges of other Illinois reservoirs.

Harvest of black bullhead and black crappie was low, however, harvest was similar to other large Illinois lakes.

Harvest of largemouth baas could have been much greater as considerable percentages (46 to 85%) of legal sited bass were released.

The CPE snd harvest per hectare was much less than for other Illinois lakes or a national mean. Overall, August was the best month to catch largemouth bass at Clinton Lake.

36

Walleye and hybrid striped bass were the most harvested of the experimental species. The best harvest of these fish occurred in 1986 and harvest may increase with continued good stockings.

l 37

REFERENCES CITED Baker, B. K. 1983. 1981-1982 creel survey of Lake Norman, North Carolina. Research report PES /83-33. Duke Power Company, Huntersville, North Carolina.

Bruce, D. S. 1988. Newton Lake, Illinois, creel summaries.

Central Illinois Public Service Company, Springfield,1111nof s.

Carlander, K. D., C. J. Dicostanzo, and R. J. Jessen. 1958. Sampling problems in creel census. Progressive Fish-Cultv-ist 20:73-81.

Clark, R. D., Jr. 1983. Potential effects of voluntary catch and release of fish on recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3:306-314.

Degan, D. J., R. D. Harrell, S. R. Johnson, and L. E. Miller. 1982.

1979-1980 creel survey of Lake Wylie, North Carolina / South Carolina. Research Report EL/82-15. Duke Power Company, Huntersville, North Carolina.

Gablehouse, D. W., Jr. 1984. A length-categorization system to assess fish stocks. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4:273-285.

Hanson, W. D. 1974. The fishery of a Missouri reservoir receiving thermal effluent. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 27:722-734.

Heidinger, R. C. , B. L. Tetzlaff, W. M. Lewis, J. N. Ptoeckel, and J. R. Finke. 1984. Project completion report - Illinois striped bass project. Federal Aid Project F-26-R. Illinois Department of Conservation and Southern Illinois University-Carbondale.

Holbrook, J. A., II. 1975. Bass fishing tournaments. Pages 408-415 in R. H. Stroud and H. Clepper, editort. Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, D. C.

Illinois Department of Conservation (IDOC). 1988. Creel survey results. F-69-R Project. Division of Fisheries, Springfield, Illinois.

Jenkins, R. M., and D. I. Morais. 1971. Reservoir sport fishing effort and harvest in relation to environmental variables.

Pages 371-384 in G. Hall, editor. Reservoir fisheries and limnology. American Fisheries Society Special Publication No. 8, Washington, D. C.

Kurzawski, K. F. 1984. Clinten Lake creel survey 1982-1983. Illinois Power Company, Decatur, Illinois.

38

1 i

Lutterbie, G. W. 1988. The white crappie population of Clinton Lake, j Illinois, 1982 through 1987. Illinois Department of Conservation, j Division of Fisheries, Gibson City, Illinois.

Malvestuto, S. P. 1983. Sampling the recreational fishery. Pages 397-419 in L. A. Nielsen and D. L. Johnson, editors. Fisheries i techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

Malvestuto, S. P., W. D. Davies, and W. L. Shelton. 1979. Predicting the precision of creel survey estimates of fishing effort by use 1 of climatic variables. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108:43-45.

McNurney, J. M. , and M. Frakes. 1979. Recreational creel survey at Lake Sangchris: a midwestern cooling lake, 1975-1976. Pages 6-1--6-39 in Evaluation of a cooling lake fishery, Vol. III.

Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.

McNurney, J. M., and H. Dreier. 1981. Lake Sangchris creel survey:

1973-1975. Pages 594-614 in R. W. Larimore and J. A. Tranquilli, editors. The Lake Sangchris study: case history of an Illinois cooling lake. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 32(4).

National Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame. 1985. The Splash.

Hawyard, Wisconsin.

Osborn, T. C., und D. H. Schupp. 1985. Long term changes in the Lake Winnibigoshish walleye sport fishery. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Section of Fisheries, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Pallo, M. S. 1987. Clinton Power Station environmental monitoring program preoperational biological report 1978-1986. Volume 4, Fisheries. Illinois Power Company, Decatur, Illinois.

Smithson, J. A., and K. F. Kurzawski. 1962. Clinton Power Station environmental monitoring program biological report. May 1978-November 1980. Volume 2, Fisheries. Illinois Power Company, Decatur, Illinois.

USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1978. Creel data for Crab Orchard Lake, Illinois. Carterv111e, Illinois.

I I

39

i h-1 I

J l

1 APPENDICES 40

l

[-

Appendix 1. -Monthly summaries of estimated hours expended, numbers of fishes harvested (kept), and numbers of fishes caught and i released by anglers, Clinton Lake, 1984.

1 ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY  :

ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT  ;

FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION j CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY l APRIL 1984 EFFORT

SUMMARY

l BOAT BANK TOTALS  !

HOURS HOURS HOURS /HA 1 i

DAY TYPE

, WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 16320 3103 19423 9.81 WEEKDAY 5806 2847 8653 4.37 TOTALS 22126 5950 28076 14.18 ESTIMATED KEPT -

ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TI'PE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT COMMON CARP 0 0.00 0.000 - 105 0.05 0.005 BOAT' BLACK BULLHEAD 0 0.00 0.000 - 12 0.01 0.001 BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 171 0.09 0.008 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 13924 7.03 0.629 - 16540 8.35 0.748 BOAT BLACK CRAPPIE 116 0.06 0.005 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT WALLEYE O 0.00 0.000 - 15 0.01 0.001

---BOAT TOTALS--- 14040 7.09 0.635 - 16843 8.50 0.761 BANK LARGEMOUTH BASS 0 0.00 0.000 -

198 0.10 0.033 BANK WHITE CRAPPIE 1782 0.90 0.299 -

16622 8.39 2.794 i

---BANK TOTALS--- 1782 0.90 0.299 - 16820 8.49 2.827 TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 15822 7.99 0.564 33663 16.99 1.199 41

Appendix 1. Continued ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY MAY 1984 EFFORT SUKHARY BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS /HA DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 27808 '5828 33636 16.98 WEEKDAY 33004 3985 36989 18.67 TOTALS 60812 9813 70625 35.65 ESTIMATED KEPT -

ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 7 0.00 0.000 - 3318 1.67 0.005 BOAT BLUEGILL 265 0.13 0.004 - 1631 0.82 0.027 BOAT GREEN SUNFISH 41 0.02 0.001 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT ROCK BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 11 0.01 0.000 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 59263 29.92 0.975 - 121009 61.08 1.990 BOAT BLACK CRAPPIE 187 0.09 0.003 - 49 0.02 0.001 BOAT STRIPER X WHITE BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 22 0.01 0.000 BOAT CARP O 0.00 0.000 - 104 0.05 0.002 BOAT FLATHEAT CATFISH 0 0.00 0.000 - 7 0.00 0.000 BOAT BLACK BULLHEAD 86 0.04 0.001 - 332 0.17 0.005

---BOAT TOTALS--- 59849 30.21 0.984 - 126483 63.85 2.080 BANK BLUEGILL 0 0.00 0.000 - 33 0.02 0.003 BANK WHITE CRAPPIE 3806 1.92 0.388 - 61787 31.19 6.296 BANK BLACK BULLHEAD 471 0.24 0.048 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK FRESEWATER DRUM 135 0.07 0.014 - 0 0.00 0.000

---BANK TOTALS--- 4412 2.23 0.450 - 61820 31.21 6.300 TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 64261 32.44 0.910 - 188303 95.05 2.666 42

I l

i Appendix 1. Continued j i

ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY l ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT l FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY j JUNE 1984 EFFORT

SUMMARY

BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS /Hp DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 23879 5022 28901 14.59 WEEKDAY 15684 5518 21202 10.71 J

TOTALS 39563 10540 50103 25.30 ESTIMATED KEPT - ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 23 0.01 0.001 - 1424 0.72 0.036 BOAT SMALLMOUTH BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 15 0.01 0.000 BOAT BLUEGILL 558 0.28 0.014 - 1434 0.72 0.036 BOAT GREEN SUNFISH 239 0.12 0.006 - 49 0.02 0.001 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 37294 18.83 0.943 - 91611 46.24 2.316 BOAT BLACK CRAPPIE 141 0.07 0.004 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT STRIPER X WHITE BASS 110 0.06 0.003 - 23 0.01 0.001 BOAT WALLEYE 96 0.05 0.002 - 156 0.08 0.004 BOAT CARP 247 0.12 0.006 - 285 0.14 0.007 BOAT CHANNEL CATFISH 96 0.05 0.002 - 153 0.08 0.004 BOAT BLACK BULLHEAD 96 0.05 0.002 - 574 0.29 0.015 BOAT YELLOW BULLHEAD 30 0.02 0.001 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT FRESHWATER DRUM 0 0.00 0.000 - 87 0.04 0.002

---BOAT TOTALS--- 38930 19.65 0.984 - 95811 48.36 2.422 RANK LARGEMOUTH HASS 43 0.02 0.004 - 421 0.21 0.040 BANK BLUEGILL 652 0.33 0.062 - 97 0.05 0.009 BANK GREEN SUNFISH 217 0.11 0.021 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK WHITE CRAPPIE 5713 2.86 0.542 - 6975 3.52 0.662 BANK CARP 0 0.00 0.000 - 375 0.19 0.036 BANK CHANNEL CATFISH 1596 0.81 0.151 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK FLATHEAD CATFISH 65 0.03 0.006 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK BLACK BULLHEAD 108 0.05 0.010 - 408 0.21 0.039 RANK FRESHWATER DRUM 87 0.04 0.008 - 97 0.05 0.009 BANK SHORTHEAD REDHORSE 87 0.04 0.008 - 0 0.00 0.000

---BANK TOTALS--- 8568 4.33 0.813 - 8373 4.23 0.794 l

....... . .. -- -=....................

TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 47498 23.98 0.948 - 104184 52.59 2.079 43

Appendix 1. Continued ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY JULY 1984 EFFORT

SUMMARY

BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS /HA DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 13212 4596 17808 8.99 WEEKDAY 14701 4405 19106 9.64 TOTALS 27913 9001 36914 18.63 ESTIMATED KEPT -

ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 90 0.05 0.003 - 1678 0.85 0.060 BOAT BLUEGILL 329 0.17 0.012 - 3257 1.64 0.117 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 6035 3.05 0.216 - 6963 3.51 0.249 BOAT WALLEYE O 0.00 0.000 - 45 0.02 0.002 BOAT TIGER MUSKIE O 0.00 0.000 - 44 0.02 0.002 BOAT CARP 60 0.03 0.002 - 1469 0.74 0.053 BOAT CHANNEL CATFISH 332 0.17 0.012 - 191 0.10 0.007 BOAT BLACK BULLHEAD 300 0.15 0.011 - 2451 1.24 0.088 BOAT FRESHWATER DRUM 20 0.01 0.001 - 78 0.04 0.033

---BOAT TOTALS--- 7166 3.62 0.257 - 16176 8.17 0.580 BANK LARGEMOUTH BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 50 0.03 0.006 BANK BLUEGILL 2041 1.03 0.227 - 437 0.22 0.049 BANK CREEN SUNFISH 50 0.03 0.006 - 1319 0.67 0.147 l

BANK ROCK BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 50 0.03 0.006 BANK WHITE CRAPPIE 4876 2.46 0.542 - 4498 2.27 0.500 BANK BLACK CRAPPIE 2076 1.05 0.231 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK CARP 276 0.14 0.031 - 50 0.03 0.006 BANK CHANNEL CATFISH 0 0.00 0.000 - 50 0.03 0.006 BANK FRESHWATER DRUM 310 0.16 0.034 - 234 0.12 0.026

---BANK TOTALS--- 9629 4.86 1.070 - 6688 3.38 0.743 TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 16795 8.48 0.455 - 22864 11.54 0.619 44

l j

i Appendix 1. Continued 1

ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION 1 CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY AUGUST 1984 EFFORT SUHMARY BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS /HA DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 12667 3574 16241 8.19 WEEKDAY 9561 4521 14082 7.11 TOTALS 22228 8095 30323 15.30 ESTIMATED KEPT -

ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 41 0.02 0.002 - 1234 0.62 0.056 BOAT BLUEGILL 199 0.10 0.009 - 5487 2.77 0.247 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 1766 0.89 0.079 - 10182 5.14 0.458 l

BOAT STRIPER X WHITE BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 44 0.02 0.002 BOAT TIGER HUSKIE O 0.00 0.000 - 18 0.01 0.001 BOAT CARP 0 0.00 0.000 - 206 0.10 0.009 BOAT CHANNEL CATFISH 23 0.01 0.001 - 100 0.05 0.004 BOAT BLACK BULLHEAD 0 0.00 0.000 - 994 0.05 0.045

---BOAT TOTALS--- 2029 1.02 0.091 - 18265 9.22 0.822 BANK BLUEGILL 0 0.00 0.000 - 939 0.47 0.116 l 658 0.33 0.081 - 3190 1.61 0.394

! BANK WHITE CRAPPIE BANK BLACK CRAPPIE 126 0.06 0.016 - 0 0.00 0.000 BANK STRIPER X WHITE BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 177 0.09 0.022 BANK CARP 142 0.07 0.018 - 102 0.05 0.013 BANK BLACK BULLHEAD 190 0.10 0.023 - 1241 0.61 0.153

---BANK TOTALS--- 1116 0.56 0.138 - 5649 2.85 0.698 TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 3145 1.59 0.104 - 23914 12.07 0.789 45

Appendix 1. Continued ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION' CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY SEPTEMBER 1984 EFPORT

SUMMARY

BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS- /HA DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY- 12590 2095 14685 ~7.42

. WEEKDAY' 7681 1956 9637 4.87 TOTALS 20271 4051 24322 12.29 ESTIMATED KEPT - ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW' TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA. CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 79 0.04 0.004 - 2146 1.08 0.106 BOAT. BLUEGILL 141 0.07 l0.007 - 551 0.28 0.027 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 28902 14.59 1.426 - 17556 8.86 0.866 BOAT- BLACK CRAPPIE 83 0.04 0.004 - 0 0.00 0.000-BOAT STRIPER X WHITE BASS 46 0.02- 0.002 - 598 0.30 0.030 BOAT WALLEYE 46 0.02. 0.002 - 101 0.05 0.005 BOAT 'LEPOMIS HYBRID 32 0.02 0.002 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT CARP O 0.00- 0.000 - 367 0.19 0.018 BOAT- CHANNEL CATFISH 18 0.01 0.001 - 6 0.00- 0.000 BOAT- BLACK BULLHEAD 0 0.00 0.000 - 135 0.07 0.007

' BOAT FRESHWATER DRUM 0 0.00 0.000 - 50 0.03 0.002

---BOAT TOTALS--- 29347 14.81 1.448 - 21510 10.86 1.061 BANK- LARGEMOUTH BASS 682 0.34 0.168 - 341 0.17 0.084 BANK- BLUEGILL 0 0.00 0.000 - 650 0.33 0.160 BANK- WHITE CRAPPIE 2460 1.24 0.607 - 325 0.16 0.080

l. BANK CARP 157 0.08 0.039 - 52 0.03 0.013 BANK BLACK BULLHEAD 39 0.02 0.010 - 325 0.16 0.080

---BANK TOTALS--- 3338 1.69 0.824 - 1693 0.85 0.418 TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 32685 16.50 1.344 - 23203 11.71 0.954

' 46

l Appendix 1. -Continued ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT FIELD BIOLOGY SECTION CLINTON LAKE CREEL SURVEY OCTOBER 1984 EFFORT

SUMMARY

BOAT BANK TOTALS HOURS HOURS HOURS /HA DAY TYPE WEEKEND / HOLIDAY 5704 1837 7541 3.81

. WEEKDAY 11710 2015 13725 6.93 TOTALS 17414 3852 21266 10.74 ESTIMATED KEPT -

ESTIMATED RELEASED INTERVIEW TYPE SPECIES NUMBERS / HA CPE RELEASED / HA CPE BOAT LARGEMOUTH BASS 21 0.01 0.001 - 882 0.45 0.051 BOAT SMALIMOUTH BASS 0 0.00- 0.000 - , 10 0.01 0.001 B04T BLUEGILL 0 0.00 0.000 - 327 0.17 0.019 BOAT GREEN SUNFISH 222 0.11 0.013 - 222 0.11 0.013 BOAT WHITE CRAPPIE 24232 1 23 1.392 - 27419 13.84 1.575 BOAT BLACK CRAPPIE 269 0.14 0.015 - 0 0.00 0.000 BOAT STPIPER X WHITE BASS 0 0.00. 0.000 - 782 0.39 0.045

BOAT WALLEYE O 0.00 0.000 - 21 0.01 0.001 BOAT CARP 200 0.10 0.011 - 57 0.03- 0.003 BOAT BIGMOUTH BUFFALO 12 0.01 0.001 - 16 0.01' O.001 BOAT CHANNEL CATFISH 0 0.00 0.000 - 36 0.02. 0.002 BOAT BLACK BULLHEAD' 0 0.00 0.000 - 32 0.02 0.002 BOAT' FRESHWATER DRUM 0 0.00 0.000 - 10 0.01 0.001

--BOAT TOTALS---- 24956 12.60 1.433 - 29814 15.05 1.712 BANK WHITE CRAPPIE 2766 1.40 0.718 - 5668 2.86 1.471

' BANK STRIPER X WHITE BASS 0 0.00 0.000 - 177 0.09 0.046

---BANK TOTALS---

2766 1.40 0.728 - 5845 2.95 1.517

' TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 27722 13.99 1.304 - 35659 18.00 1.677 47

Appendix 2. Monthly summaries of estimated hours expended, numbers of fishes harvested (kept), and numbers of fishes caught and released by anglers, Clinton Lake, 1985.

tt: C 5 :.ra C: east thW18 stthfsL asfalF5 Of*a4Tnskt FitLC E!CLCGT SECT!:4 CL161Ch Last CREIL SutVtf APall 1985 EFFCRT SunnaPT 3Ca1 gama TOTALS MCU55 MCUR$ NOLR5 / Na Daf TT7E witKENO I HOLICaf 21247 67d1  !!001 16.66 WttaCAT 1!352 59i1 21313 10.76 TOTALS 41599 12722 54321 27.42 817198TE0 afPf [!T!P ATIC R tL E a l! C

...................n....e.............. ..........

INTity3tv TTpt 5ptC!!$ hLugla! / ka Cpt *ptLEs5EC / Ma Cpt sosi TICla muSEELLUNCE C 0.0C 0.0C0

  • 46 C.02 0.CC1 504T Copa:N Ca48 15! 0.Cf 0.004 49' O.25 0.C12 434T 6LaCa BULL 4140 20t 0.1C 0.0C5
  • 1a63 C.74 0.C15 Scat (nauw!L CATF15n C 0.CC 0.CCD
  • 102 0.05 0.CC2 80af MitR10 STRIPT 0 $455 C 0.CC 0.0CS
  • 29 C.C1 0.C01 8347 CettN SU48!5M 91 0.C5 0.0C2
  • 121 C. 06 0.CC3 B3af SLUTCILL 612 0.31 0.01 5
  • 2192 1.11 0.Cf3 90af SasLLPCUTH 8455 C 0.CC 0.0C0
  • 10 0. 01 0.CCC 6?af La:GluCuTH 8455 95 0.C5 0.CC2 ** 1C95 0.55 0.C26 8047 WHI T E C eaP'If 72691 16.69 1.747 6t?44 34.50 1.443 3:41 SLatt CtaP71t 22e 0.11 0.0C5
  • O 0.00 0.0C0 stat maLLITI C C.CC 0.0C0 ** 146 0.07 0.CC4 Sca? FatSMwaTEa D'Um 3C C.C2 0.CC1 79 0. 04 0.CC2

..... s pa t TcTaLS**-- FISH TCTALS 74113 27.41 1.7t2

  • 74125 37.42 1.712 sawa 6LaCa tuLLM!aD 1574 0.78 0.124 1!41 C.78 0.121 56%s Cettw guy,gsw g 3.c; 0,ct?
  • iigs C.66 0.102 Baht tLUtitLL  ! 0.C C.CC;
  • itse' C.!2 0.CF2 sans :T! Cia.oie e o.::

0.o:3

- 525 e.27

.... ..e.....

C 41 l ......a.. T:7,ts.... ,n , T:,atl i S T4 3 79 c.12 4 - .434 2.22 '

0. u .

, 73 fat au a m i,5 ' nhF,im--titi"-hiir- ii.n--~th; 1

48

L

~

Appendix 2.? Continued ILL th*15 P0uta ConP ANT ENtitchPth14L APPales Ol'ARTuthT P!fLt 910 LOGY SECTION CL1h10h LAtt CPEIL Sutvif MAT.1985 EPPC89 $UrnART test B A NE TOTALS MCuss MCut5 M0Uss /MA 947 TTPE uttKtwo # N0L10af 44424 151CD 59728 30.15 t

stra0AY ' 2E103 10031 3tt34 19.25 TOTALS 72731 25131 97862 49.40 187!mstt0 REPT

...................+............Ll.as.t.o..... EST1P8ff0 st . .

- INTIPvitW TYPt SPEC!t$. hLPSt85 # M4 CPE *RELES$fC / NA CPt 80AT, TIEER WU5EtLLUNGE C 0.00 0.0C0

  • 117 0. 04 0.CC2 seat r -Cornom CAar 305 0.15 0.0C4
  • 1136 05? 0.C16

. 3047- stack SULLMtAD 253 . 0.13 0.0C3

  • 1910 0.94 0.026 80AT : ftLLCW SULLMia0 33 0.02 0.0C0
  • 4 0 . 00 0.0C0 804T CH ANNEL CATP 3SN 13 0.01 0.0C0
  • 479 0. 24 0.CCF 0047 '

MTtRIO STEIPED SASS C L.00 0.0C0

  • 259 0.13 0.CC4 90AT 68 t E N SUNP!5M SC 0.03 0.0C1
  • 225 0.11 0.CC3

, BOAT- GLutGILL. 2136 1.08 '0.029

  • 3Ct1 1 52 0.041 SOAT SMaLLMCUTM BASS C 0.CC 0.0C0
  • 15 0. C1 0.CCO SOA1 LasstMCUTM 8455 17 0.01 0.0C0
  • 4466 2 54 0.Cd4 30AT WHITE CeAPPIE 185214 13.50 2.547
  • 171143 86.00 2.384 8047 . BLACE CR APPit 328 0.17 0.0C5
  • 0 . 0 00 0.0C0 8047' ~ WALLETE 2C 0.01 0.0C0
  • 1155 0.58 0.016 BOAT. PetSMWafia paw 4 SC 0.C3 0.OC1 * .54 0.03 0.CCI

...**s0AT 70T AL5*. PISH TCT4LS ifE421 15.11 2.591

  • 194175 93.37 2.543 AANE 6ttEN Suet $M 201 0.10 0.0C8
  • 0 0. 00 0.CCO BANE StutCILL 100' O.51 0.040
  • 2732 1.13 0.~e9 SANE LaRGIMCUT,' sa55 E 0.C0 0.0C0
  • 201 0.10 0.0Cf SANE WMitt Cta'rtt 5142 2.60 0.2C5
  • 1?16 0.46 0.C!?

&aNE WALL E TE C 0

....... ..0 .0.C .. 0C.0

.. *.....201 .C .10 .0 C.C.t .

..... sana TOTALS...., P!!M TCTAL$ (347 3.2C 0.253

  • 3150 1.99 0.157

~~

~ % it

~ ~~~

TCTAL ALL ANGLlas 32 9 Uf5~~" U.U " "~ .13 49

=.--- = _ _ _ - - . _ _ . . __

I I

Appendix 2. Continued ILLIhCIS POWER COMPANT tht!R0hrinf aL APP A!8 5 OtPaRTMthT P!!LC t!DLOGT SECTION CL3hich Last CettL $0tVET JUNE 1985 (PPCAT $UMMatt SCAT SANK TOTAL $

MOU85 moues M0085 /HA DAT 1TPE WEtatko / MOL10af 22586 123t2 3497C 17.65 uteE0AV 1617 117t4 21401 10.80 TOTALS 32205 24144 5d371 28.45 f1TIP8780 EtPT tSitpait s

thitaritW TTPE

............ .. ...................0 afLE.A$.t.C.....

SPEC 1f1 WLPlf83 / ka CPt *RELis$tt / Ma CPE 80AT TIGtt MU5atLLumGt C 0.00 0.0C0

  • 19 0. 01 0.0C1 80af CDPM0k CARP 11C 0.06 0.0C3
  • 308 0.16 0.010 00AT StaCE B ULLu t a 0 17 0.01 0.0C1 943 0.48 0.C29

' 80a7 CHANhtL CATPI$M 135 0.C7 0.0C4

  • 289 C.15 0.CC9 SDAT MTtRIO $f21720 SASS 102 0.05 0.0C3
  • 249 0.13 0.CC8 8047 ROCE $455 C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 135 0.07 0.CC4 80a7 GRitu SUNPISM 244 0.12 0.0C8
  • 210 0.11 0.CC7 804T SLUtGILL 176C 0.09 0.035
  • 3784 1 . 91 0.117 00AT LA85tPCUTH 6 AS$ - 6C 0.03 0.0C2
  • 1403 0 . 71 0.C44 SOAT WHITE CAAPP18 2575C 13.00 0.800
  • 45C82 22.76 1.4C0 3047 staCE CtAPPIE 737 0.17 0.023
  • 0 0. 00 0.CCO DOAT mALLETt 0 0.00 0.000
  • TCP 0.36 0.022 B SAT PRE 3MWaffe OtuM 35 0.02 0.0C1
  • 261 0.13 0.0C8

.. i L *****SDAT TOTAL 5---- P15M TOTALS 2895C 14.41 0.519 * $3391 26. 95 1.658 An Baha COPMeh CatP C 0.00 0.CCO

  • E53 0.43 0.C?5 SANK SLacs IULLMEAD C 0.CC 0.0C0
  • 4376 2. 21 0.121 Baht cms 4 Nit C ATP15M 534 0.27 0.022
  • 321 C.16 0.C13 satt 6tttN suspisM 191 0 10 0.CCS
  • 161 C. 05 0.0C7 sahn SLtf GILL 733 0.37 0.030
  • O 0.00 0.CC0 Bahn LasstMCUTH tall C 0.CC 0.0CC
  • 482 C.24 0.C20 Baha WHITE CaaPp3E 1012 4.58 0.37e
  • 25232 1 2.74 1.C64 Sans Pat $whafte DeU=

.......C 0.C0 0.0C0 *

  • E03 C . 41 0.Cf3

t a g s T O T A L S** -- PISH TCTAL5 1C54C 5.32 0.436

  • 3222t 16.27 1 334

~~~~

TOTAL ALL aNGLt#5 ~~~3I9k'~~1093 0 C1 ~ ~ tEi 5"~ ' 'I3.I2 "~ ~~ ~ I. !19 50

Appendix 2. Continued Ittih023 posta C0atant (NV100hPthTAL APFAIRS DEPaeTMthf P!tLO RICLOGY SECTION CLik10h Last CatfL Steftf JULY 1985 EPPCRT Summaaf SCAT t a kt TOTALS N0ues nouns NOUPS IHA DAY TTPt WEfttwo / nOL10A1 9412 3153 12765 6.44 utttCAT 12595 Sete 18221 9.20 TOTALS 22207 8779 3C984 15.64 flf!paTeo EEPT * ($f 2P Af t0 ptL f a$t o

............ .. . .. +.......... .. .. ......

ShTt#WitW TYPE SPECIES NU#8tt$ / HA CPE *atL885tC / NA CPt 8347 TIste muSEELLUNGt C 0.00 0.0C0

  • 89 0. 04 0.OC4 SDAT ConMDb CatP 173 0.09 0.0C6
  • 422 0 . 21 0.019 BOAT StsnCUTM SUP9ALO C 0.0C 0.0C0
  • 8 0. 00 0.CCO BOAT SLACE tutLMEAD 30f 0.16 0.014
  • 1C27 0.51 0.045 80AT TELLOW SULLMIA0 0 0.00 0.0C0
  • 4 0.00 0.000 8047 CMAWNtL CATPISM 255 0.13 0.011
  • 712 0 . 34 0.032 804T ptst!O STt!PIO B AS$ 4 0.00 0.0C0
  • f40 0.42 0.038 DOAT SLUEGILL 938 0.47 0.042
  • 2C59 1. 04 0.C93 8047 LaeGen0UTH SASS 249 0.13 0.011
  • 2C74 1 05 0.C93 SOAT apelf t Ca APPIE 5377 2.71 0.242
  • 3756 1.90 0.140 BOAT SLACE CRAPPIE 89 0.04 0.004 0 0.00 0.0C0 00AT WALLEft C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 123 0.06 0.006 SOAT Fat 5nuaTea Deum 0 0.C0 0.0C0
  • 291 0.15 0.013

---=*BCAT TOTAL 5=- ~ P!$N TOT ALS 7393 3.73 0.333

  • 11385 5. 75 0.513 tant eLACE OuLLMtto 125 0.04 0.014
  • sie 0. 46 0.1C4 BANK CHANNEL CATP!$4 114 0.C4 0.313
  • 487 0.35 0.07c SANE WTit20 $fAIP10 sass C 0.00 C.3CD
  • 114 0.04 0.C13 Satt SLUtG2LL C 0.C0 C.0C0
  • 861 0.53 0.112 sahn ww2ft CRAPPIE C 0.C0 C.0C 0
  • 4 67 0. 35 0.C7f SAWK FatSMha'ta Deum C 0.CC C.0C0
  • 114 0.06 0.011

. ....latt TOTALS.*~ FI 5M TCTALS 239 0.12 0.027

  • 3489 1. 77 0.389 f~ ~~~~ ~~ ~

~~

TOTAL ALL ANGLtes f~t ~E A A~ ~ ~ ~~ I. 1~~ . t0 I

1 51 1 1

i p 4 Appendix 2. Continued f.,,.:m m n u u n m,.t ,

PIELC BIDLOGT SECTION CLibf 06 LAtt CettL SutTET August 1985 EPPtRT SUMastf.

I SCAT BANE TOTALS MOUA5 Mouts M0085 / MA DAT TTPE WitEIND # N001087 12301 2981 15282 7.71 bite 0av 19003 2350 21353 10.78 TOTAL 5 31304 S331 36635 18.49 ISTIN87t0 EfPT ISTEPeft0 eE t a tt e

............ .. . .. 4. ....... .. ......

INTERVIEW TYPE SPIC 185 gunstES / Ma CPt *RELlostC # M4 CPE TICit musstLLUNGE 153 0.08 0.0C5

  • O 0. 00 0.CCD 8047 0. 09 0.005 80af Corn 0N CatP O 0.00 0.0CD
  • 170

' 3 0a f SLACK SULLHiAC 1104 0.56 0.035

  • 724 0 . 37 0.023 O 0.00 0.0C0
  • 17 0 . 01 0.0C1 Boaf TELLOW SULLMt AO 0.C22 80A T CMahutt CATPISM 102 0.05 0.0C3 ** dB7 0 . 35 00ef Mf B810 ST4!Pf D SASS 118 0.06 0.0C4 1870 0. 94 0.040 SOCE 8455 0 0.00 0.0C0
  • 33 0. 02 0.0C1 80AT 0.Cao DOAT .StutGILL 133 0.07 0.0C4
  • 2C51 1. 04 80a7 LARGEMOUTM SA55 80 5 0.41 0.026
  • 2730 1 . 38 0.087 80s7 WMITt Ca APPIE 21725 16.01 1.013
  • 27T89 14. 05 0.8f8 GLACE CRAPPIE 6d 0.03 0. 0C 2
  • O 0. 00 0.0C0 t-50af 0.012 50AT uaLLEft 85 0.04 0.0C3
  • 384 C.19 PatSMwaffe ORun 0.00 0.0C0
  • 150 0. 06 0.CCS 804T ......C . ... . . ... a. .... -.. ......

34291 17.31 1.095

  • 34f13 1 8 . 48 1.170

* 80AT Tof at s--- PISH TOTALS SANE CDPMSN CetP e 55 0.03 0.01 0

  • 55 0.03 0.010 eLACE tuLLMEAD 11C 0.06 0.021
  • O 0.00 0.0C0 taka 0.CC0 esht TELLCW suLLMtaD 55. O.C3 0.010
  • 0 C. 00 27f 0.14 0.052
  • O C. 03 0.CCC SaAs Gattk SUN #35M 0.C47 Saka 6Lu! GILL 11C 0.C6 0.021
  • 250 C.13 LafGtMCUTM B&55 C 0.00 3.0C0
  • 70 0. 04 0.013 Sant 0.0C0 gant WHIT! CtaPPIE SS 0.C3 0.010 ** C C . 00 sahs ftt1rsafta OtuM 11C 0.C6 0.021 0 0.03 0.CCO 771 0.38 0.145
  • 375 C.19 C.070

sant TOT AL S a= == P!5M TCTALS Y~70~~~~ 0 . I ~~~ U li'~ ~U .6I~~~~~ .01

~~

+ TOTAL ALL ANGLfts 52

Appendix 2. Continued ILLikCIS Pogfa COMPAhv thv!achPfhTAL APPa!R5 OtPARTMthf P2fLC SIOLOGT SECTIDW CL1h10h LAAE C#tfL SLRvff stPTEMste 19s5 iPPCtf SUMM A RT Stat t a nt 10TALS MCuts MCut$ Moues #MA DAT TTPE

'~- u t tt f uD / McL10 A T 23170 32C' 24379 13.32  !

usesCAT $480 1343 70A3 3.56 TOTALS 28850 A$72 33A22 16.98 f STINSTto E EPT ESTIPATED SE fA$f0 INTE*t!fW TTPt . SPECit$ hLF8tt! /MA CPE **tLEastC / MA C PI 804T CopMON CAar 25 0.01 0. 0 C 1

  • 267 0.13 0.0C9 SCAT BLACK SULLM E AD 0 0.00 0.0C0
  • 37 0. 02 0.CC1 B CA T -TELLOW SULLMfA0 A7 0.02 0.0C2
  • 0 0. 00 0.0C3

. 50if CMANhtL CATP!ln 201 0.10 0. 0 C 7

  • 91 0. 05 0.0C3 404T ' NT9eto STRIPED BASS 2A 0.01 0. 0 C 1
  • 1725 0. 87 0.0d3 43AT. BLutCILL 12 0.01 0.0C0 * #8A 0. A5 0.C31 SOAY LAsGEMCUTH 845$ 178 0.09 0.0C6
  • 3182 1 . 61 0.110 BOAT WMITE CeaPPIE 3108C 15.49 1.077
  • 19171 10.08 0.492 SCAT SLACE CtAPPIE 574 0.29 0.020
  • O 0. 00 0.0C0 SOAT WALLtTt 12 0.01 0.0C0
  • 116 0 . 06 0.CCA SOAT <2 f 5MW ATER OnuM C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 190 0.10 0.0C7

... .. . ... a. .... ..- . ...

          • SC AT TOT AL5**= ' P15H TOT ALS 32155 16.21 1.115
  • 24463 .1 3 . 16 ., 0,917

~ ~~

TOTAL'ALL ANGLtts 32 to 23~ ~ I ~ ~~ U 3~~ l 3. 34 II.

1 1

53

l l

L Appendix 2. Continued .;

I l

ILLIh315 Ponte Come ANT tht!PDhP f kT AL APP AISS Of p ART >thf P! TLC $1DLOGY SECTION CL!hT06 LAtt Cof f L SURVtf CCTotte 1985 EPPCRT SUMMART SCAT S A bt TOTALS Mouti MOURS M0bt1 /MA DAT TTPE WitEtuo / N0L10AT 11364 1598 12934 6.53 WEtt047 14607 1749 16354 8.25 TOTALS 25953 3337 2129C 14.78 1

l l

Elfluaftp Kfpf

  • tlf!PAff0 #BLEAlto

.......... .. . ....e.......... .. ......

INTIPr!!W 777E SPfC3f5 htPSEt1 / MA CPE *stLEA5ft / MA Cut a BAT TICER nU1EfLLueGE 15 0.01 0.0C1

  • O O. 00 0.CCO BOAT Comm04 CAar 93 0.04 0.0C3
  • e6 0.03 0.005 30AT' OUILLSACE C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 25 0 . 05 0.001 80AT BLACE SULLMEA0 5t 0.02 0.001
  • 19 0. 01 0.C01 SOAT MTet!O STalPt0 8153 C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 377 0.19 0.015 8047 ROCE BAS $ 0 0.00 0.0C0
  • 1612 0. 01 0.042 50AT &afEN SUwP!5M C' O.00 0.0C0
  • 10 0 . 01 0.0C0

'SDAT BLUfGILL 138 0.07 0.0C5

  • 1755 0. 89 0.048 BOAT LanGEMOUTH B A15 C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 995 0.50 0.C38 e DAT WHITE C A APPIt 1415C 8.15 0.422
  • 20461 14.37 1.097 BOAT DLACE CRAPP!t 491 0.25 0 019
  • 0 0. 00 0.0C0 SDAT WALLETE 25 0.01 (.001
  • 93 0 . 05 0.0C4

====- 8 0 A T 10f at$ == == P15M TOTALS 14939 8.53 e 433

  • 33413 1 6 . 57 1.287 BANE- WTra!O Sf a!Pt0 5455 0 0.00 0.0C0
  • 3133 1.58 0.959 BANE WHITE CR APP!t 0 0.00 0.000
  • 319 0.16 0.Cf6

.... . ... . . ... a....... .. ......

84WI TO T AL 5---- PISH TOTALS C 0.00 0.0C0

  • 3452 1 . 74 1.C14 3 A f 3~ ~ ~ ~iE. 1 ~~ ~1.I3

~ ~ ~

TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 6 3t S E~ ~~ 6 5 ~

54

{

i

. 1 i

l' Appendix 3. . Monthly summaries.of estimated hours expended,

~

numbers of fishes harvested (kept), and numbers )

of fishes caught and released by anglers, Clinton Lake, 1986.

I 2LL14ti$ C'84%T

- tnV3 436p t NT PCW18 aL ap pa IS(3 El' Atleth?

P2tLO SIOLCCT SEC13G4 CLia10N Latt Cetit 5terIT tretL.iett EFF087 SU4PART 908T takt 10TALS MOU85 6tual MOU'S / Ma CAT TTPt bElftNO 2 MCLICat $360C 12114 6571f 3}.18 6tiscaf 32383 4420 3e803 -18 58 101eLS 45983 18518 1C2521 51 7e flf1 pat 10 Et#9 E Instet at

............... ...... ......ST.. . . ... . ...t.i a....

llt.....

IWittvite TYPE 5*tCit5 huttf#$ # MA Cet *a:Least0 t ma Cet 8081 TICit puSEELLUNGE 107 0.C5 C.CC1 +7 0.05 0.CC1 6081 C0rm34 CAR 8 3C 0.C2 0.C C C

  • eC1 C.3C O.C ( 7 toaf Stata SULL>tA0 1915 0.5e O.C13
  • 238 0.12 0.C ( 2 40A1 C48hwfL C41815k 13 0.C1 0.0C L
  • 55 0.03 0.CC1 Scal Mfr810 STRIFtD 8455 152 0.Cf C.CC2
  • 955 0.48 0.C11 test Lt
  • 0m ! $ $P. 215 C.11 0.CC!
  • O 0.CC 0.C(C o 2 05 80A1. SLutG1LL 73C 0.37 0.0C1
  • 4C57 0.047 8081- SmaLtmoutn ta11 C 0. C C 0.0C 0
  • 24 0.C1 0.C(C 8081 LatGr*CUTM ta55 61 C.C3 C.0C1
  • 6Coe 2.C3 0.047 Scal WHITE Cearf3t 47058 47.43 1.053
  • 9CC15 d5.44 1.C47 SSA1 SL A CE C84*f31 1C08 0.51 C.C12
  • 36 0.C2 0.C(C 8041 waLLt TE . 34 0.C2 0.CCO
  • 1CT4 0.54 0.C 12 e6 0.C ( 1 8081 F8t14batta stum C 0.CC C.C C D *

... . ...... =....... .....2 0.0

..=.*8081 701aLS.... P!$u TOTall 97431 49.1t 1.123

  • 1*1227 S t .i t 1.117 Sabs 'Comm3h Catt C 0.CC 0. C C D
  • 569 0.2f 0.C f 3 Sant piteID Sieltt3 lass C 0.CC 0.CCG
  • 54' O.2t C.C f 3

' t ant Gatts $UN835H C 0.CC C.CCL

  • 24e C.12 0.C T!

taks LLLti1LL C 0.CC C.C C S * #fet 4.88 0.Ste esas La:GioCut> ta15 C 0.CC C.C CC * $47 C.28 C.C12 esta reps *.a'!8 Ctus $at 0.2f C.C?!

  • O 0.CC 0.C(C

.. 5 4A E T Tats..** '35% TCTALt 568 C.2P C.C?3

  • 1158a 5.*! C.7(C 13tal ELL aktLla1 ciaa: 60.at C.s 5 112'11 !s.*! 1.1(C t- 55 L
y. -

f

i!

V i i

l Appendix 3. ' Continued  ;

l i

14L16(15 PCWE8 CCesa%v thvi83het =T AL af ra ga s (t e ssisth7 P!tLD RIOLCGT S E C11 PN CL5hT3h Latt CettL Sktvet pay 1986 greDef SuqPapf

$0af 58WE TOT EL S NOLR5 > CUSS >0045 / Ma Cav TTPE bilatWL # NCLICat 4845C 14722 33172 41.98 begaCaf ,deG91 1?9C' 80000 4C.38 TOTALS 134 $ 41 2t431 163172 SI.36 1571*af tC se tt E

.. . .. . . ... ... .. .. . .. . .. . . ....S T. .I .".81 t C ..

..... e t t.f .a l l t. . .. . .

NLWlt85 # Na C#f *etLfals0 / Ma CF3 INTf8V13. TTpt 5'tCIt5 0.34 0.C C 5 Seal TICla pulstLLUNGt C 0.CC 3.CC3

  • 710 302 0.15 0.CC 2
  • 1C19 0.52 C.CCf 83A1 Cop *3h Casp SLaCa avLLet&O 3C5t 1.54 0.C23
  • ette 3.08 0.0 A 5 6041 0.0C2
  • 303 0.15 0.CC2 00a1 CMangtL Catt!5e 139 0.16

- Miteto 31ejsto Sall 187 0.C4 0.CC1

  • 4037 2.04 0.C!C 8061 0.CC 0.CCO
  • 21 0.01 0.CCC ROCE sa55 C 80af 18 0.C1 0.CCC
  • 0 0.0C 0.CCC 6041 LEPO425 SP. 0.44 0.C s e

' Ettt4 5U4F314 19e 0.1C 0.CC1 * #72 E041 0.C a s

  • 7s3e 4.01 0.C !
  • 5088 SLutGILL 3829 1.93 10e O.C6 0.C01
  • 6224 4.15 0.C t1 8081 LafGt>CUTH ta55 102.4 1.5CE 83a1 Wa!TE Ctapple 2C4174 103.1 1.51t
  • 202950 2255 f.14 0.C17
  • 721 D.38 C.C C 5

.5041 DLaCE Coastli 0.CC4

  • 6137 3.1C 0.C 4 e 8041 vaLLift off 0.24

...014 74 0.C4 C .C C 2 Fat 5guafts Caum ..C .C.C.1 **... 320 it . t:41. ....... ... . ... .. ......

214'92 104.5 1.5EF

  • 234281 12C.4 1 716

== --- 8 0 81 T O T AL 5 -* ** F15M TCTALS C 0.CC O.CCD

  • 43C 0.!! 0.C 15 6468 Comm3h Cae7 C.CCC
  • 209 O.1C C.CC7 sans sLact autL& tac C 0.CC 2151 1.C4 0.015
  • 860 0.41 C .C ! C 6aka (mah4tL Caittle 0.CC 0.CCO
  • 52 0.0! C.CC2 Pass metett sTelsto esf 5 C C.CCC
  • StS* 2,9f C .i t t tasa caff% S u'. F 2 t M C 0.CC C 0.CC C.CCC
  • 755 0.?F C .C i e takt t LL t G1L L C.CC;
  • 113a6 5.7! C.!le tarctmCufe tast C 0.CC 6ake 3290 1.44 C.115
  • 1757 0.13 0.Ct1 taas- k.!TE C8aFF18 0.CC;
  • 204 0.1C C.C C 7 -

Fe Subsfes (tum C 3.CC fans ....... ...... ...... *....... ...... ......

SASC 2.74 0.15;

  • 2112; 10.14 C.7A5

.. . t a t s . ) C t a t t.* ** 'Isw TCtats ~ *

  • total ALL a h G L t a l' 22Ca?I 111.3 **I.3II~ ~ ~ I'C II'* *~13I* e*** *
  • 1.5II 56

r 1

n I m-I t

' Appendix 3. Continued i

i ILL1hC15 F tut s Ct*8 a%T thyl836mittat as*4165 treastetkt FIELD st0LCGT 5tCf 3 3N l

CLikf 06 tale Ca ttL 5teytt Jt et 19f t i

I'8Ctf lumosat SC81 SANs 1074L5 NOLe5 >CUA5 Mpual / Ma Cat TYPE tilstWD / MCL10st 26733 E943 45676 21.C5 tris 0AY 232C8 eC20 29428 14.86 TOTALS $9941 15183 75104 37.91 e571paffC KEPT

e. I ..... ..

..S t i m a t .e t s..t.....

L..f a ll s .. ..

INTERVith 1788 5ptCgt5 typetal / MA CPt *stLis5tC / MA Cet E!!!AFC SM8C 0.CC 0.CCC

  • 29 0.01 0.CCC Scal C 0.CCC
  • 63 0.03 0.CC1 5081 T14f4 PU5sttLUust C 0.CC S ca t . CDPm0N Ca*7 117 0.C4 0.CC2
  • 902 0 4d 0.C15 9081 SL 8 CE SULLega0 2371' 1. 2C 0.C40
  • 3144 1.51 0.C!2.

CMahmtL Colf!5e 14C4 0.71 C.023

  • 78? 0.4C O.C 13 3041 0.52 0.C 17 B081 MTfe!0 5taisto tals tot 0.Cf 0.CC2
  • 1023 Gattu SUN'35M 41 .0.C2 0.0C1
  • F6 0.04 0.CC1 80A1 2.5d 0.CIS 8041 SLWIGILL 4131 2.01 C.C(9
  • 5081 S paLLa CUT H fA55 2f 0.C1 0.CCC
  • 28 0.01 0.C C C 5041 1.eC 0.Cf3 30A1 La'Ge>CUTM fall its 0.Cd 0.CC2
  • 3164 kw!Tt C4AsF3t 26C72 13.14 0.435
  • 57242 IB.9C 0 92?

8081 1.04 0.C!4 sost wattive 597 0.3C C.010

  • 2C51 per3Mhafte taum C O.CC 0.0C0
  • 338 0.17 0.Ctd B0st ....... ...... ...... *....... ...... ......

FI 54 TCTAL5 35C2f 17.6 f 0.5fa

  • 73943 17.32 1.I!4

.. 50a1 TCTaLS.~.*

C0pach CAef C 0.CC C.CCC

  • 938 0.47 0.Cd2 tahs 1.53 C.159 B&kt O L A CE SULL> tac 41 7 0.21 0.Ci n ** 3C26 Casku tt C 81* ISM 521 0.2f 0.C34 1?& 0.C5 C.CC7 taks 1Ce C.05 C.CC7 Sant Lf80415 58 C 0.CC C.CC C
  • Gt8t= SU%8114 C C.CC O.CC3
  • 11'6 3.55 C.C17 Baas 3.41 C.edt esta ELL 4 GILL *?! O.4P C.Cf3
  • 6te4 S e aLLeC uY a tall C C.CC C.CCC
  • 711 C.3d C.Cd7 taas O.Cd C.CCI e&64 Lsr$1. UT* !all C C.CC C.CCC **  ??'

balti C8 ass jt  !??? 1.41 C.244 2347f 11.*! 1.?dP tats 0.CC C.CCC

  • 1C3t 0.57 C. Cit take h1LL*vt C 1251 0.41 C.Ct!

taga r:C5= batts tauw C 3.CC C.CC L * ......

ff'C 2.*d 0.??4

  • 35712 18.54 2.513

.. . essa TClatt.... s!$w it?AL1 1?tet att anstar$

-- I!it;--* 2 5~i"~~ ~~ C iti"*~iiiii!"~~~5%~ii'~ ~~~i".iii

)

57

l Appendix 3. Continued ILL!N35 *0Wl8 CLyr ag, tuvie04mtN'AL AP8&Its ?t'att=fut eget0 g! OLOGY SECT!Du CLINTON Last CettL SuevFT JULY 1*ge 587041 Stmwaev B O AT SawE TOTAL5 MOUE 5 Wogal MOU45 / Ma C AT TYPE tilstND / N0LSDaf 10T95 S110 15805 f.03 titsCav 20993 3077 24070 .12.15 TOTAL 5 31788 0187 39eF5 2C.18

  • E IsagtC ettlastr EST1maffD Et*T

............... ........e.....ST.....................

thtfevite TTpt 58 t t it 5 uuM9tt5 # MA C88

  • RELf Ast0 # NA C*t 8:47 Cop 43u Caep 407 0.31 0.010
  • 245 0.12 0.0C6 seat SL a C4 SULLefa0 1213 0.e1 0.C3'
  • 3**e 2.02 0.924 8281 CaAv4tL CATFilm 805 0.41 0.021
  • 0 0.0C - 0.CCC sost MTee10 Sve3Pt0 e655 0 0.OC O.000 ** 600 0.3C 0.015 43at SLUI52LL 245F 1.24 C.C7? 2306 1.17 0.072 804T LeeGlucuTM fA55 C 0.00 0.0C S
  • 90' O.46 0.02*

99a1 v41TI C# A* Plt 43106 21.76 1.35'

  • 27571 13.92 0.P47 esat watLI TI - 127 0.06 0.CCA
  • 25 0.01 C.OC1 4*AT f#tS4Watta ceUn 0 0.0C 0.000
  • eis 0 31 0

.. 01*

. .... ... . ...... =....... ...... ...

.-- = 6 0 41 T D T a L S- .. P!5M TOTALS 4831d 24.39 1.920

  • 34272 18 11 1.141 44314 24.39 1.520 36272 18.31 1.141 TOTAL ALL ANGLit$

L 58

l i

i l

l Appendix 3. Continued TLLIbOIS POWee Comp ANT ENVIR0hrthT8L APP AIRS Of raaf athT P3 TLC t! OLOGY SECTION CLth10h LAtt CettL SLevtf AUGUST 1996 EPPCRT SU8WI Af f BCA1 Sant TOTALS MCUS$ MC UR S M0485 / MA CAT TTPt UEMitc # MOLICAT 2C212 4761 25003 12.42 WINEAT T5499 3435 22894 11.55 ESTIN8T ED REPT ESTIP ATED etLI A$f D

. .... . .. .....-e. . . -. - -. ...

INTERVIEW TTPE SPEC 3t$ NUPSIES / MA CPI *PELieltC / MA CPI SDAT TIsta NuSAELLUN$t C O.00 0.0C0

  • 63 0. 03 0.002 SOAT CDPMON CARP 447 0.24 0.012
  • 1374 0 . 49 0.C35 BOAT eLACs sutLMEAD 628 0.32 0.016 ** E33 0.42 0.021 S OA T CMSNhtL CATPISM 43t 0.22 0.011 196 0 . 30 0.015 SOAT MT0810 STRIPio 8415 17d 0.09 0.004
  • 1447 0 . 73 0.036 S OA T GettW SUNPISM C 0.00 0.0c0
  • 55 0. 03 0.001 80AT eLutstLL 345 0.17 0. 0 C 9
  • 3550 1 .79 0.029 SOAT LAREf p0UTH S&$5 83 0.04 0.0C2
  • 3f44 1.M 0.057 SOAT WHITE Ct&PPIE 20813 14.54 0.726
  • 25528 1 5. 11 0.754 BOAT DLACE CRAPPIE 323 0.14 0.0C8
  • 0 0. 00 0.0C0 BOAT WALLtit 229 0.12 0.0Ce
  • 257 0.13 0.0C6 804T PRI5MWatte DaUn 0.00 511 0 36 0 013

. C. . 0 0.C.0

          • S O A T TOT AL S *.- PISH TOTALS 31502 15.90 0.794
  • 42458 21.43 1.070

' Babe GttEN SUuP!5M C 0.00 0.0C0

  • 233 0.12 0.028 takt eLutCILL 2844 1.44 0.346
  • 0 0. 00 0.CCO B&4E LARGtpCUTM 8455 C 0.00 00C0* 467 0. 26 0

.. C57

.---- s akE TOT AL $--== P!5M TCT ALS 2644 0 700 C.35 0.Cf5

.. .. . 1. 44.. .. 346. . . . .

TOT AL, ALL ANGLets 34344 17.34 0.717 43155 21.79 0.9C1 59

l' l

v.

1 l -'

L.

l ...

l i

Appendix 3. Continued I

)

i EstlehkhfIk}f$k$fekoth!afath?

PIELC O!DLDET SECTION CL16106 Latt CettL SWtVtf SEPTEM9t R 1986 (FPCaf summary Stat samt TOTAL $

MCUel MOURS N0085 # M4 SAT 1TPt NiettN8 1 McL10af 2C099 5045 25104 12.60 WesteaY 14104 2416 1452C 8.34 1874LS 34165 7481 41624 21.02 stT!ast re EEPT tlfleeffe GELeatto

. ....... -..... e. .. .......- ......

INTERVItW YYPE SPE C 188 NWatt91 # M4 CPI *stLlastC / NA CPt scat Ospues CaaP 27 0.01 0.0C1

  • 233 0.12 0.0C7 BOAT OLSCE SWLLuts0 27 0.01 0.0C1
  • O 0. 00 0.CCD t ha t CMematL CaTP!5M S1 0.03 0.0C1
  • O 0. 00 0.0C0 SDAT ' NTea!O STRIPT 0 S&$$ C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 1348 0. 68 0.C39 80a t ' BLutSILL 27 ' O.01 0.0C1
  • 375 0.19 0.C11 404T LasstnOUTM SA55 35 0.02 0. 0C 1
  • 3211 1 . 62 0.Cl4 scaf untTE CeaPPtt 48615 24.55 1.424
  • 4C551 20.47 1.1ft 404T ALaCR C8&PPIE 48 0.02 0.001
  • O 0. 00 0.0C3 SOAT thtLETE C' O.00 0.0C0
  • 151 0. 00 0.0C4 80AT PRESNeaTER OtWN O 0.00 0.OCO
  • 169 0. 09 0.0C5

.. .. . ... =. - - .. ......

80 AT 70T aL 8 ==== FISH TOTAL 5

  • 48052 24.66 1.431
  • 4eC38 23.24 1.348 Sant BLutCfLL 251 0.13 0.034
  • 251 0.13 0.C34 Baht MMif t C A APP i t $179 2.61 D.492
  • 2358 1.19 0.315 Samt BLACE CaAPPIE 134f 0.48 0.180
  • O 0. 00 0.0C0 samt Petsnustta Deum 251 0.13 0.034
  • O 0. 00 0.0C0

===== 6 &N E T OT AL S ---- FI8N 10faLS 7025 3.55 0.940

  • 2409 1 . 52 0.349

~ ~~

~E

~~

TOTAL ALL ANGLERS 5 i 2 3 It fi'7~~ " 2I. .14 60

_I.

c.

s.

r-

Appendix 3. Continued ILL3bC15 POwit C0stANT fWW3P0&Pfb1AL ApsAIRS DtpaRTathT FItLC IIDLOCT SECTION CLT6106 L Att Cp!f L SL4Wtf CCTOSER 1986 IPPCtf SpamART SCA1 Seht TOTALS MCUf$ NOUR$ MOLf1 #MA

.DAT TYPE WitEtWD / ts0LICAV 2 !1 49 2312 25461 12.86 titEECAT 2C215 A0(4 2427S 12.25

- TOTALS 43364 6374 4574C 35.11

  • 8571P Af f0 agL eastC 33ftmAffC EtPT ......

SPECIE S IILp 5t S 3 / MA CPI *stLiastC # MA Cft INTEAVItu TYPE 0.C10 3 0A T CoPmon CatP C 0.00 0. 0C 0

  • A13 C. 21 ALACE SULLME AD C 0.00 0.CCD
  • 167 0.19 0.0C8 SOAT 80AT CManutL CATP21M 9 0.00 0.0C0
  • O 0. 00 0.000 SOAT sertt10 STRIPT 0 SASS 9 0.00 0.0CD
  • t85 0.45 0.020 SLLEGELL ns 0.16 0.DC7
  • 157e 0. 90 0.036 SOA1 0.C73 8047 LasstMCUTN SASS C 0.00 0.0C0
  • 3186 1 . 61 MMITE CeAPPIt SC$52 25.52 1.166
  • 71C21 35.85 1.632

'80AT 0.00 0.0C0 SDAT ALACE CEAP 83E 37 0.02 0.'JC1

  • 0 45 0.C 2 p CC1
  • 36 0. 02 0.CC1 9047 mALLETt 0.1F O.CC8 8047 PetsMuafft Opus C 0.00 d.0C0
  • 237 3C9CC 25.72 1.175
  • 77t23 49.28 1.F13

...-. 3 04 T T O T AL S =* = F35M TOT AL5 LABCIMCUTW G A$$ C 0.00 0.CC0

  • 278 0.14 0.C44 s AME WHITE CRA**It 7631 3.95 1.157
  • 11186 5 . 65 1.754 sans 7 40 same aLACE CrAPPJE ..... 98 ..0 .. . 0 .12 4 .*. ... . . 0 . 0.C0 .- .0 C.C.0
5. 79 1 798

8 8 4: TOTALS *- - P15M TCTALS f ai.t.

... .. A.25

.. . . 1 3 2 0. *. 114 64 total Att A=sLens ~7DF-~1Ut"~1 TW~~ inn ~' U.U ~~ ~~ ~i.f si l

61

Attechnent E 0-600580 LO 4-8 8 (10-0 5)

ILLINDIS POWER 00MPANY CLINTON POnL9 $1 ATaON. P.O. 80x 678 CLINTON. ILLINOIS 61727 October 6, 1988 Michael W. Conlin, Chief Division of Fisherics Illinois Department of Conservation 600 N. Grand Avenue West Springfield, Illinois 62706

Dear Mr. Conlin:

RE: ' Clinton Lake Creel Survey Summary Report Enclosed are the copies of the above These referenced reports are report which summarizes data from 1982 to 1986.

being submitted as per our agreement in the Clinton Lake Master Management Plan. We hope this information will be useful to your staff.

We are still collecting creel data for the two year operational period (1987-1988). That data will be submitted to.you in 1989 and will complete our commitment to conduct ,

creel surveys on Clinton Lake.

o If you have any questions on the report or need additional copies, please let me know.

Sincerely,

/// [

James A. Smithson /

Supervisor, Field Biology JAS/gw J Enclosure /

cc: G. W. Lutterbie, IDOC w/ attachments

)

T. E. Kieler, IDOC w/ attachments J. L. Robinson, A-17, w/o attachments

  • bec: N. D. Lienemann, F-14, w/o attachments S. P. Hall, V-920, w/o attachments D. Wilson, V-920, w/o attachments

,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20245D882&oldid=3169348"