ML20245C533

Staff Requirements Memo Re 890413 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Rockville,Md Re SECY-89-089, Effectiveness Review of Final Initial Decision - Disposal of Accident-Generated Water at TMI-2

ML20245C533
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	04/21/1989
From:	Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:	Parler W NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M890413C, NUDOCS 8904270198
Download: ML20245C533 (1)

Text

_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. _ _ _ _ _. . ._ _ _ _ _ _ .

3 *p UNITED STATES IN RESPONSE, PLEASE-

[(\

g ..

g

,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 REFER TO: M890413C

• o[ ' April 21, 1989 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM FOR: William C. Parler, General Counsel FROM: [gfa:5L muel J. Chilk, Secretary

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION AND VOTE, 3:30 P.M., THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 1989, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

1. SECY-89-089 - Effectiveness Review of Final Initial Decision - Disposal of Accident-Generated Water at TMI-2 The Commission, by a 5-0 vote,* approved an order which finds that the Licensing Board decision granting General Public Utilities application for an operating license amendment that would delete prohibitions on disposal of the accident-generated water should be made immediately effective.

(Subsequently, on April 13, 1989, the Secretary the signed order.)

cc: Chairman Zech Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Carr Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Curtiss EDO GPA R - Advance CS - P1-24 i

l

• Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. j 5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a " majority vote of the members present." j Commissioner Carr was not present when this item was affirmed.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 4-0 in favor of the decision. Commissioner Carr, however, had previously indicated that he would approve this paper and had he been .

)

present he would have affirmed his prior vote. * ((3 8904270198 890421 3 i

PDR 10CFR p PT9.7 PDC