ML20245C368
| ML20245C368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1989 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245C366 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8904270136 | |
| Download: ML20245C368 (2) | |
Text
,,,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. - - - - - - - -. _. _ _ _ _ _, - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
g
,,,[*
,[p2 Rf C jo.,
UNITED STATES.
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7;
- E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20666
\\...+)
a SAFETY' EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED T0.AMEhDMENT.NO. 91.70 FACILITY.0PERATING. LICENSE NO..NPF-6
- ARKANSAS. POWER AND LIGHT. COMPANY
' ARKANSAS NUCLEAR.ONE.. UNIT.NO. 2
_ DOCKET NO. 50 368 INTRODUCTION By letter dated November 17, 1986, January 13 and April 5,1989. Arkansas t
Power and Light Company (AP&L or the licensee) requested amendments tu the TechnicalSpecifications(TSs)appendedtoFacilityOperatingLicenseNo.
NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2).
The proposed amendment would incorporate reporting requirements affected by 10 CFR Part 50, Sections 50.72 and 50.73, pursuant to Generic letter No. 83-43 dated December 1983. Section 50.72 modifies the immediate notification requirements for operating r.uclear power reactors and Section 50.73 provides for a revised Licensee Event Report System.
EVALUATION
~
This amendment recuest whs reviewed against the staff positices containeo in Generic Letter 83-43 and was foured to be in conformance with that guidance.
Appropriate changes in the " Administrative Control", and " Definitions" sections were s.ade as well as in those sections of the Technical Specifications which address reporting requirements affected by the 10 CFR Sections 50.72 and 50.73 revisions. Since the amendment incorporates the NRC provided guidance, in compliance with the revised regulations, and since it makes changes which are administrative in nature, we find the amendment to be acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL. CONSIDERATION The amendment involves a change in ths installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes in recordkeeping, reporting and administrative procedures and requirements. The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the assunts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant l
increase in ir.dividual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures. The Conanission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideratfor and there has been no public comment on categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22sc)(9) y criteria for such finding. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibilit and (10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental is. pact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the assindment.
8904270136 890418 PDR ADOCK 05000368 P
o
- CONCLUSION The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the will not be endangered by operation ir, the proposed manner, and (2) public such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Connission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the connon defense and security or to the health ar.d safety of the public.
Date: April 18, 1989 Principal Contributor: Chester Poslusny Jr.
I l
i, i
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.