ML20245A388
| ML20245A388 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1987 |
| From: | Bizzak R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-#187-2882 OL, NUDOCS 8703250169 | |
| Download: ML20245A388 (78) | |
Text
%
.a Filed:
March 20,~1987 00CKETED
-USNRC d. MM 23 M1 :14 f0C i
vik'
^
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BRANC!i NUCLEAR ~ REGULATORY COMMISSION before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of
)
)
Locket Nos. 50-445-OL TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC
)
50-446-OL COMPANY et al.
)
)
(Application for an (Comanche Peak Steam Electric
)
Operating License)
Station, Units l'and 2)
)
)
ANSWERS TO BOARD'S 14 QUESTIONS (Memo; Proposed Memo of April'14, 1986)
Regarding Action Plan Results Report I.b.2 In accordance with the. Board's Memorandum; Proposed Memorandum and Order of April 14, 1986, the Applicants submit the answers of the Comanche Peak Response Team ("CPRT") to the 14 questions posed by the Board, with respect to the Results Report published by the CPRT in respect of CPRT Action Plan I.b.2, Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation.
l q' B70320 h
,s050gf 145 a
L
e-l Opening Request:
Produce copies of any CPRT-generated checklists
-that were used during the conduct of the action plan.
Response
The CPRT inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical-ventilation panels utilized inspection reports which are attached to CPRT~ Quality Instruction QI-OO4, "CPRT ACTION PLAN I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation; CPRT ACTION PLAN I.b.2 -
Flexible Conduit.to Cable Separation."
All of the questions below dealing.with checklists are answered with respect to this inspection procedure.
The CPRT also utilized checklists in the compilation of multi-train panels.
One of the actions requested.by the NRC was a reinspection ~of all panels that contain redundant conduits.
In order to determine the scope of this activity, it was necessary to identify all panels that contain more than one train.
To do this, the CPRT Electrical Review Team reviewed all Unit 1 electrical drawings to determine which panels contained cables from more than one train.
This list was then used by the CPRT to examine the multi-t,
l l
l l
l
s, train panels to determine where Servicair flex _had been used as a barrier.
The process that was used to compile the list of multi-train panels is described in the ISAP I.b.1 Working File,-in particular, Documents I.b.1-6B.009 and I,b.1-6B.011.
Since these checklists were only used to determine the scope of the multi-train panels and were not used in inspection activities to determine the acceptance or rejection of safety-related attributes, Questions 2 through 9 are not relevant to this review checklist.
Question:
1.
Describe the problem areas addressed in the report.
Prior to undertaking to address those areas through sampling, what did Applicants do to define the problem areas further?
How did'it believe the problems arose?
What did it discover about the QA/QC documentation for those areas?
How extensive did it believe the problems were?
Response
The original issue raised by the NRC-TRT involved exposed cables in the control room panels that were in contact with Servicair flex containing redundant cables.
This configuration was in violation of existing Project requirements, which specified a one-inch separation.
In addition, the NRC questioned the 1
i use of Servicair flexible metallic conduit as a barrier.
If Servicair flex could not:be shown to be a
_ barrier, a six-inch separation was to be: maintained,
~
which is the separation distance for two exposed cables.
Furthermore, the NRC stated that "TUEC shall also reinspect all remaining panels in the control room and other areas of the plant containing separate cables and cables within flexible conduit The first issue that was addressed was the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier.
This evaluation was required to determine-the appropriate separation _between an exposed cable and a cable in Servicair flex.
This task was performed in conjunction with the testing and analysis performed in Action Plan I.b.l.
The Results Report for I.b.2 describes the steps that were taken to demonstrate the adequacy of l
Servicair flex as a barrier.
Though it was assumed at the start of this action plan that Servicair flex was used only in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels, it became apparent that Servicair flex had been used in other electrical panels.
Rather than use sampling techniques, the Electrical Review Team examined all l
i l
l l
h
~
multi-train panels, i.e.,. panels that contain more than one electrical train.
These are the only panels that would have used Servicair flex as a barrier.
-The CPRT third-party examination of multi-train panels identified all cases where the final CPRT separation criteria for exposed cables and cables in Servicair flex had been violated.
In addition, although the NRC only addressed the case of an exposed cable and Servicair flex, the CPRT third-party found that other separation criteria were not being met in the control room panels.
The CPRT third-party did not determine a priori that QA/QC activities or any other activities were responsible for the identified-deviations.
This investigation of root causes was performed during.the implementation of Action Plan I.b.4.
The generic implication evaluation of the root causes to determine the extent to which other electrical panels could similarly be affected was also performed under Action Plan I.b.4.
Based on this evaluation, it was determined that a reinspection of all electrical panels i.
requiring separation between redundant cables should be t
-S-J
O s
- n 1
performed.
Question:
-2.
Provide any procedures or other internal documents that are necessary.to understand how
-the checklists should be interpreted or applied.
Response
As noted above, the inspection report used by the CPRT third-party inspectors during their inspection of the control boards and vertical ventilation panels was a part of Quality Instruction QI-004.
All revisions of
.this procedure are included in File I.b.1-3 of the ISAP I.b.1 Working File.
In addition, all background information used to develop'the criteria in the procedure are included in this file.
Question:
3.
[ Original acceptance checklists.
See Transcript of'the Pre-Hearing Conference of April 22, 1986, at 24,353-57.']
Response
The Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels were inspected shortly before the CPRT third-party inspection.
During the Project inspection, the procedure used was QI-QP-11.3-40, Revisions 19, 20 and 21, " Post Construction Inspection of Electrical Equipment and Raceways."
In addition,.$
3 O
in-process inspections had been previously performed in
\\
accordance with QI-QP-11.3-28, " Class 1E Cable Terminations."
As noted in the Results Report, preliminary, conservative inspection guidelines were used during the CPRT inspection.
This was done so as to provide an indication of the extent of potential modifications required for compliance with the final CPRT separation criteria.
In addition, the information obtained from this inspection was used in the testing and circuit evaluation performed to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as-a barrier.
The separation distances specified in the CPRT inspection guidelines were greater than or equal to the distances specified in the criteria in QI-QP-11.3-40 and QI-QP-ll.3-28.
Question:
4.
Explain the extent to which the checklists contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes to which Applicants are committed to conform.
Response
With one exception, the CPRT Inspection Report included a check of all physical separation attributes - -
J
m
^
1 required by'IEEE 384-1974, "IEEE Trial-Use Standard Criteria'for Separation of Class-1E Equipment and Circuits,"'and~ Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 1,
" Physical Independence of Electric Systems."
The one
~
exception is that the separation of cables, each enclosed ~in a vendor wireway, was not verified.
Since-the Project criteria at that time allowed two redundant-cables in metallic. conduits to touch, the metallic wireways used in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels are allowed to be in contact with
- one another.
Therefore, no inspection of separation between vendor wirebays was required.
Question:
5.-
(Answer question 5 only if the answer to question 4 is that the checklists do contain fewer attributes.)
Explain the engineering basis, if any, for believing that the asfety margin'for components (and the plant) has not been degraded by using checklists that contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes.
Response
See response to Question 4.
. Question:
6.
Set forth any changes in checklists while they were in use, including the dates of the changes.
! i l
I L
.J
Response
The following revisions were made to the CPRT inspection procedure QI-004:
Initial issue 1/18/85 Revision 1 2/18/85 Revision 2 2/26/86 Revision 3 3/6/85 Revision 4 3/12/85 Revision 4 of QI-004 was used for all control boards and vertical ventilation panels except control boards CP1-ECPRCB-01 thru -04, which were inspected to Revision 2 and control boards cpl-ECPRCB-05 and -07, which were inspected to Revision 3.
Since the first revision used in an actual inspection was Revision 2, changes made prior to Revinion 2 do not affect the inspections performed.
In addition, changes made subsequent to Revision 2 of the procedure do not affect the panels inspected to revisions earlier than Revision 4.
1.
Revision 3 changed the inspection method for missing barriers.
Rather than perform a paper trace to determine if documentation exists for the J
i
~ installation / reinstallation of missing barriers, the inspector was to determine whether or not the barrier is required for separation purposes.
In addition, changes were made in the way in which the Inspection Reports were to be completed-for control boards CP1-ECPROB-10 and -11 and the vertical ventilation panels (CPX-ECPRCV-01 and -03).
2.
Revision 4 provided additional clarification on the inspection criteria for control boards CP1-ECPRCB-10 and -11 and the vertical ventilation panels (CPX-ECPRCV-01 and -03).
Since control boards CP1-ECPRCB-10 and -11 and the vertical _ ventilation panels (CPX-ECPRCV-01 and -03) were inspected to Revision 4 of QI-004, the changes F4.d not affect the inspections performed to Revisions 2 and 3 of QI-004.
Question:
7.
Set forth the duration of training in the use of checklists and a summary of the content of that training, including field training or other practical training.
If the training has changed or retraining occurred, explain the reason for a
.the changes or retraining and' set forth changes-in duration or content.
Response
Classroom and field training were conducted for Revision 0 of QI-004.-
A 50-minute classroom session and a one-hour field course were held for inspectors.
Training was-performed for Revision 2 of QI-004, the first revision actually used in the inspection of the panels.
Revisions 3 and 4 contained minor changes that were addressed in formal discussions with the inspectors.
Question:
8.
Provide any information in Applicants' possession concerning the accuracy of use of the checklists (or the inter-observer reliability in using the checklists).
Were there any time periods in which checklists were used with questionable
. training or QA/QC supervision?
If applicable, are problems of inter-observer reliability addressed statistically?
Response
There is no information available concerning the accuracy of the use of the checklists or inter-observer reliability in using the checklists.
The subject inspections were conducted primarily in the first quarter of 1985; there were no time periods in which the checklists were used with questionable training or Mw
l QA/QC supervision.
All-inspectors were certified Level II or above in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1.
Question:
9.
Summarize all audits or supervisory reviews (including reviews by employees or consultants) of training or of use of the checklists.
Provide the factual basis for believing that the audit and review activity was adequate and that each concern of the audit and review teams has been resolved in a way that is consistent with the validity of conclusions.
Responses No ERC Corporate Audits or Supervisory Reviews were conducted which were directly related to the use of the checklists or training applicable to this action plan.
However, ERC Corporate Audits 85-01 and 85-03 and QA Surveillances 185-01 and III85-09 verified that ERC inspectors were qualified and certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1.
In addition, applicable ERC inspectors received classroom instruction and on-the-job training in the requirements of QI-004, which is the instruction which governed the reinspection effort.
Question:
10. -
Report any instances in which draft reports were modified in an important substantive way as the result of management action.
Be sure to explain any change that was objected to (including by an employee, supervisor or consultant) in writing or in a meeting in which at least one supervisory or management official or NRC employee was present.
Explain what the earlier drafts said and why they were modified.
Explain how dissenting views were resolved.
Response
Neither Mr. Bizzak (the Issue Coordinator) nor Mr. Mallanda (the Review Team Leader) could recall any substantive changes during the generation, review, and editing of the report resulting from management action.
Accordingly, our answer to this question is:
None.
Question.
11.
Set forth any unexpected difficulties that were encountered in completing the work of each task force and that would be helpful to the Board in understanding the process by which conclusions were reached.
How were each of there unexpected difficulties resolved?
Response
Several unexpected difficulties were encountered during the implementation of this action plan that resulted in delaying the completion of this action plan.
These difficulties can be categorized as 4
o
'l l
problems arising from the sequencing of tasks, technical problems, andrinterface problems.
~
The problems arising due to the sequencing of
' tasks were due in large part to the initial schedule developed'for the resolution of.the issue.
To accommodate this schedule. several related activities were performed simultaneously rather than sequentially, which resulted in extra effort.
The optimum approach would have been to determine the scope of the issue, i.e.,
where had Servicair flex been used; perform circuit evaluations of the panels where Servicair flex existed; conduct tests for those c.ases in which the circuit evaluation could not be used to demonstrate acceptability of flex as a barrier; issue criteria; and perform reinspections to the new criteria.
During the formulation of the action plan, the assumption was made that Servicair flex had been used only in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels.
The action plan tasks were then initially formulated to only address these panels.
Though the assumption that flex is only used in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels is true for the majority of the Servicair flex used, flex was later found in other panels.
This necessitated a new task to identify all multi-train panels and a subsequent examination of these panels to determine where Servicair flex had been used.
Circuit evaluations, testing, and inspections of the control boards were performed during the same time period.
Since criteria resulting from the circuit evaluation and testing were not finalized, the inspections utilized preliminary guidelines that were confusing.
Subsequent work had to be performed to determine if the findings against the preliminary guidelines were also violations of the final CPRT criteria.
The testing that was performed was based on a typical installation, but did not include a full range of current levels or the worst configuration.
Due to this, subsequent parametric computer analyses were required to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex.
The technical problems involved the testing and analyses performed for the Servicair flex.
As noted above, the initial test configuration selected was not for the worst case.
The subsequent time-history computer analyses took much longer to complete than :
anticipated.
In addition, it was found after the analyses were completed that an out-of-date version of the computer code had been used, which resulted in some of the analyses being redone.
The last area of difficulty involved the interface between the CPRT and the Project.
The interface was strained at times which resulted in an inefficient use of resources.
Disagreements on the need to perform certain activities, such as the identification of multi-train panels to determine where Servicair flex might have been used, resulted in the CPRT third-party performing these activities.
Rather than coordinate activities with the CPRT third-party, the Project placed its emphasis on resolving the issue along a parallel path using Wyle test data, which was not provided to the third-party.
The lack of emphasis on the completion of the CPRT action plan shown by the Project resulted in the CPRT third-party spending excessive time to close out the issues, especially where the Project's input was required.
However, none of the above items had an effect on the activities or results of this ISAP.
Question:
12.
Explain any ambiguities or open items left in the Results Report.
Response
Open items are addressed in Section 7.0, " Ongoing Activities," of the Results Report.
The results of these activities will be reported in a supplement to the Results Report.
Any potential ambiguities are addressed in the response to Question 14.
Question:
13.
Explain the extent to which there are actual or apparent conflicts of interest, including whether a worker or supervisor was reviewing or evaluating his own work or supervising any aspect of the review or evaluation of his own work or the work of those he previously supervised.
Response
To the best of our knowledge, no conflicts of interest exist.
Question:
14.
Examine the report to see that it adequately discloses the thinking and analysis used.
If the language is ambiguous or the discussion gives rise to obvious questions, resolve the ambiguities and anticipate and resolve the questions...
Response
There are three potential areas in the Results Report that could be confusing to someone not familiar with the' subject of the Action Plan:
- 1) the chronology of events;-2) the basis for the different types of
-inspections performed; and 3) the technical details of the analyses performed to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier.
Due to the simultaneous activities performed for several different, interrelated tasks, i.e.,
inspection of separation in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels, evaluation of circuits, and testing of Servicair flex, the chronology of events is difficult to follow.
This possible confusion was noted l
during the review of Revision O of the Results Report, and a chronology of events was added in Revision 1 to clarify the time phasing of the various activities.
During the implementation of the I,b.2 Action Plan, several different physical reviews of electrical panels were performed; some of these reviews utilized different criteria.
In addition, previous or future inspections of the panels were referenced in the Results Report.
The following summary of inspection m
p activities and the criteria used should provide a clearer understanding of the physical reviews performed:
Activity 1:
Post construction inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels.
Performed by:
TUGCO inspectors Date November 1984 - January 1985 Criteria used:
The " original" Project criteria in existence since November 1980.
Activity 2:
CPRT third-party inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels.
Performed by:
CPRT third-party inspectors Date February - April 1985 Criteria used:
Preliminary, conservative separation guidelines designed to envelope the
" final" CPRT criteria to be developed as a result of this action plan.
Activity 3:
TUGCO inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels to validate l
the CPRT findings and to provide a Project inspection to the
" final" CPRT criteria.
Performed by:
TUCCO inspectors l
Date:
October 1985 l
Criteria used:
The " final" CPRT separation i
criteria developed as a result l
of this action plan. 1 J
l I-Activity 4:
Examination of all multi-train r
panels other than the Unit 1
}.
control boards and vertical ventilation panels to determine where Servicair flex has been used as a barrier.
Performed by:
CPRT Electrical Review Team Date:
January, May, and June 1986 l
Criteria used:
The primary purpose of this i
examination was to determine where Servicair flex has been used as a separation barrier.
During the examination of multi-train panels, the Electrical Review Team noted several violations of the " final" CPRT separation criteria.
Activity 5:
Inspection of multi-train panels other than the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation i
panels to determine the validity of the findings noted by the Electrical Review Team and issue Nonconformance Reports (NCRs),
as appropriate.
l Perf rmed by:
TUGC0 inspectors l
Date:
July - September 1986 Criteria used:
The primary purpose of this examination was to validate the Electric 61 Review Team's findings and issue NCRs, as appropriate.
During this inspection several additional violations of the " final" CPRT separation criteria were noted.
Activity 6:
TUGCO inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels subsequent to the completion of all i m
~~ '~
"H,!.
^
^^
,,..,2 HAR 19 '97 15:15 4CDEW WW1/-hd-5051 W %'=. 4'd outstanding work items.
Forformed by:
TUSCO inspectors 3
Dates (Future)
Criteria used (Future)
The technical details of the heat transfer testing and analysis that wee performed to demonstrate the adequacy of servisair flen as a barrier are somewhat comples, but the report was prepared in such a way se as to present the legie used in a clear, atraightforward manner.
In addition, a report was prepared by the Riectrical Review Team (Document 1.h.1-45.014 of the ISAP !.h.1 Working File) that summarises 4
l the test and analyses results, starting with the basic principles of heat transfer.
Respectfully submitted, 1
A
^
Robert Wese r i
Aetten Plan I.h.2 Issue Coordinator f.
^ _
^t
^ -
Jpha J. JJellEnda E&eetri d 1 Review Team Leader The foregoing reopenses have been reviewed and are sensurred in by the CPRT Senior Review Team.
=21-l L
<J.15. - i COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE QI-004 4
3/12/85 1
of 3 PROCEDURE FOR:
CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY
'N DATE _3 //2/85 Evaluation Rdsearch Corp.
APPROVED BY:
Il. be-DATE 3
2,[Ff*
Evaluation search Corp.
APPROVED BY:
h DATE
/ 6 a
R.TE. E@:/Ipstrumepation
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 office meno, 1/15/85. W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel
" Inspection Attributes for Action Items 1.b.1 and I.b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office meno, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,823)
- 1.3 Office meno, 2/15/85. W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,854) 1.4 office meno, 3/05/85, M. B. Jones to J. Hansel 1.5 Office meno, 2/22/85m W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PUar0SE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization.
This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2.
2.2 The scope of this procedure is the cabling end wiring w'ithin selected control panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections is any interaction between safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wireway to vendor wireway (per Ref.
1.5).
NOTE:
The scope of this Quality Instruction may be expanded at the direction of the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
k J
QI-004 RVision 4
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports.
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref. 1.1) to verify that:
ACTIVITY 1 -Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit. DIT, or Unistrut F-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1, para. 3 and Ref. 1.5).
ACTIVITY 2 -Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.
1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3).
ACTIVITY 3 -Verify that wiring is separated in accordance with, Ref 1.1, para. 4, 5. Fig.1 and Table 1 of Ref.1.3.
ACTIVITY 4 -Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref. 1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3).
ACTIVITY 5 -The correct type barrier asterial is installed (Ref. 1.1, Note).
ACTIVITY 6 -Verify that " required" barriers are installed.
Note:
" Required" means either required by a design document, or indications that a barrier was installed but has been tenoved.
The inspector will state the location of missing barriers and whether or not a separation violation has been created by the barrier's absence.
4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality taspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefsel wiring (Ref. 1.1, para.
1 and Ref. 1.2).
4.3 DOCISIENTAT!uN 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2.
4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results and inspections for para. 4.1 on the IR (Attachments 2 and 3 as applicable). For para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefsel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR.
a
QI-004 R;visitnt 4 4.3 DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd) 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2, 3 and 4) shall be Y
completed in accordance with their respective completion instructions, as applicable. The inspector completing the report
' ! 'J shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number.
The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and l
completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed IR shall be submitted to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team
. '.eader for review and approval.
+
4.3.4 Per Reference 1.1, Para. 5, the inspection results of panels XCV-01 and XC7-03 will indicate that Section A/B criteria and inspections 7
d are not applicable. All sections of panels 1CB-10 and 11 will be ir,spected to C/D criteria and documented accordingly.
i
(
l i
i
/
f f
l-f N*
l i
\\
e b
(
l I
4 I
(
!r
~
..l J
46.w*
aarv. '
Al l Attelt.n 1 1 t< age 1 or 4 s
.e-e M
bJ 'k.=
I 1
1Il
-inun r covaar umi= *A-num C cene it TEFTEL OR
.h0N TEFIEL TEFIEL CASLE NON-rE711L cASLE DNITE4) cAaks DETAIL l A
~
TEFZEL $ NON-TEFZEL CA8LES
\\
J g*]-- (*b.
ll l
TaaN a-nun e..
CASLE CDu0Ulf mum A-CDMDUT DETAll 18 ALL TEFIEL CA8LES FIGURE i
(NOTE a)
TYplCAL SEPARATIOld DETAILS FOR-e f
t) ALL WIRiNe IN 1 CS 10 ( l G-il, AND CRCUIT5 LISTr.D L
IN TABLE 1.
- 2) NON-TEFEEL WIRINCiIN ALL CDMTROL ESLEDS AWD VER-p TICAL PNLS.
- 3) WIRius IN SECTIONS C AMO O 0F AMY CONTROL E01AD.,
I I
NOTES
- 4) FOR dBIEitAL uofES,SEE OW61325-E! 1702 02 NOTT.5 4.1 $ 4
- 2) ucT1;itCA3LE -Q amu::xci" R LAMPE0Y CASLES Aaia CDAtlAL CRT CASLES.
I
!) 0310u175 ARE RIG 10 OR FLillBLE.
- 4) EhCLollue Tuis CAaLE tu si.ExiaLE Ccuou;r mt,L n0T REDUCE SE;LMIAT'.3M SHOWW.
- 3) SEP& RATION 6:ST1EC15 SHMwN App (Y tu ALL Citic"! ales (li, NOMlIDW7lkL au3 vtKTICLL),
- 4) 1:3lTIONAL *E"1tLS aAE $NC'en4 Ok Omd. 21:1.!!.1701.;2, CETAIL 61 A TARU 41 C.
4
,.d!-Od4 REY.4 AT"TACHME'NT 1 PAGE 2.0F 4 3..
TA3*.I 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION
~
RATED.MORZ THAN 10 AMPS 1-C3,
Control Bd.-
Cable Cable Protsc-ive Devic-Device Train Nu:nber Tvoe Volts Ratincr & I.ccatic'
- X-55-3264 C
NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-Es-3450 C
NK129045 G36 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1AI 1-its-4250A A
EG138987 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-E5-4251A B
EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-C3.
1/1 - APSII A
EG138998 137 125vde 30A, SWGK IIAL 1/1 - ANSI 2 5
EG139032.
237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2.
075 Handsat Station C
IPA-CR30 Handsat Station C
IPA-CR29 075 1-C3 1-RS-4518A A
ES139466 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4519A B
EG139503 237 125vde 30A, SWGR LEA 2
)
1-C3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APRE1 A
EQ135550 137 125vde 30A, SWGR LEA 1 l
1/1 - APRE1 R
EG139586 23 7 125vde 30A, SWGR IIA 2 Handset Station '
C IPA-CD.29 075 Hanosat Station C
IPA-C328 075 C
IPA-CR23A 051 Hagaytatg y
1/1 - 1PCPX1 C
HK139458 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - 1PCPX2 C
NK139459 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 l
1/1 - IPCPX3 C
NK139460 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A3
[
1/1 - IPCPX4 C
NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 l
>U
,,,QI.004 REV 4,
'ATTACHMENs 1 f. -
PAGE 3 0F 4
,-(
- (-
i...'b
- ; ', f.4f::.
,.n.
.,e
.;. +
.TAst.E 1 (Continued)
. - [. b'_ '
.1 #,::
..f
%.t s
-).
- f.
I'l,f$ '
'. ;{... k .
' * ~
',1-CB
- T L 'N hp - h-
. s.; :/ s
.y-
/h Protective Device ei#
"(7Y.,TralN'Y.@I Cable.,.,,, i Type
...@ Ratina s Location;
. Cable It :. Control Rd '
..' Volts D? Device Number.9 ;.
i.
c'
.n... s. l,
.. p;t
- j-;.~. e.:.
. qpm :
.r.
~
' t-4 NK139535 036,,
120Vac 30A,StarterCsh.l
-)l1/1. ABCU
- C
- ~
t TBX-TRANCU-0 !,
1/1 - APCH1 A*
EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 i
1/1 - APCH2 5
.EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 7,,
1-CB,
see Nace 3 Handset Station C
IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station C,
IPA-CR36 075 1-C3,
l 1-EE-2111A/B C
NKI39357 035 15Vdc (2) IWF 11 Contzol aos "EE*
l I-EE-2112A/B C
NK139367' 035 157de (2) PWP IB Control Box *EE*
1-RS-2111C C
NK139358 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. Skr.1c
'l 1-HS-2112C C
'NK139368 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Ekr. 1D l!
1-ES-2111D/E.
C NKI39359 036 11Svde 20A Ckt. skr. 10 1-HS-2112D/E C
NK139369
,036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D 1-HS-3302 C
NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr.1D 1-ES-3299 C
NK139620 036 125Vde 10A Ckt. Ekr.1D-
~
1-CB (Nota 5) 1-HS-2225
,C NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C
NK139654 037 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-ES-2450A A
EGI38895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-HS-2451A B
EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-ES-1452r AA Aa138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr. LED 1-ES-2452G/3 AA A4138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr. IED 1-CS-10 j
Handsat 5tation.
C 1PA-CR36 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR36A 051 Handset Station C
IPA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 Hanaset Station C
IPA-CR37 075
- X-CV-01
- Handset Station C
IPA-CR31 075 g
.QI-004 REY. 4 ATTACH 4FNT 1 i
PAGE 4 0F 4
- c. :.2e
- m. r
?
.' ~
+
]
TAs.- 1 (Cen-inue.d)
.)
,-l. -:,
-. s.,
v.2,
~
t
- ~.
. q; o.
- a. :; :.# ' *! :
- -N Notess
.*2tdir h? :^
2.s:. '$nh i wr:
.e
. Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are (1) fuse ratings There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control (2) panel:
- 7 a) 120Vac,. 15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt.
125Vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. til b)
Detailed information for 15Vde power supply (See GE drawing
$125D443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available.
SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-EE-SPOS/P2500 wirine have not been reviewed.,
This wiring should be separated in (3) accordanca with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria.
All auto / manual contrc3. stations in Section B of CE-4,.5 and.6 (4) have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps.
r The following auto / manual cont =cl stations in C5-08 and. CE.
(5) have 26vde lama circuits fused at.15 amps.
'C3-08 C3-09
\\'
1-FK-510 1-PK-507 l
1-5K-509A 1-FK-520 1-5K-5098 1-rK-530 1-5K-509C 1-rK-540 1-rK-550 l
I.
~
l i
l i
I e
l 9
i r
l J
^ ' ' * " ' '
.QI-004. REY.4
'N UF COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 REY. Oand I.b.2 REY._ @
'fMDESCRIPTION: FLEXI8LE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT / CABLE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT ID h
DRAWING
_ REY.
'OCA's
~
~
INSPECTION CRITERIA PANEL SECTIONS A & B h
DCA's b PANEL SECTIONS C & D h
DCA's A w
INSPECTION RESULT 5 @
Ah8 C&D i
pq*
2 3
4 5
'f
.6 b
REMARKS:
l h
BADGENO.@
INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b
DATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL b
DATE b ERC Level III REVIEW AND APPROVAL h
DATE h Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L.
g
- QI-004 REY. 4 ATTACHMENT 2
. 1 NGE 2 os g
.,. > +.
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAN - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2
', ?
INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS
. ')
W
- 1..
.y
~.,Q
-(. -
. ~ :*
~
y
. s, y, _,
~-
kh?h' f. ~..i*.:.'.* < :..
'. -; t.Y. 4 N
)i *? h::-;,; :$
.s
.i l.
i.
k..
hN Y );h:
,t.fi i'0N $
8LOCx5:
,, ci,j,. =
- o \\.ff;,-.; :;c
.s 9
.. "r 1 -
7s.,
.. j.,..., g.,..
.q s
~ ; ;. WC.,
1.
Enter current revision level.
-Y 2.
Enter equipment ID. drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as requfrec 3.
Enter all applicable inspection criteria, including revision levels, specific detatis as aopropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading.
-4.
A.
Sign and date the appropriate block (SAT /UNSAT) of each Panel Section column for each inspection activity perfanned in that Panel Section 8.
If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the, appropriate Panel Section.
5.
A.
Document all deficiencies (UNSATS) in a brief, clear manner and organized in outline form.
Ex. _ Activity 1. Item 1 - (Deficiency description)
Item 2 - (Deficiency description)
B.
Enter applicable DCA's and any additional information necessary to clarify the inspection re: ults. Attachment 3 may be used if more space is required.
l 6.
Inspection signature, data and badge number.
l 7.
Approval signature and date of ERC Level III.
8.
Approval signature and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
t J
I
.QI-004 REV.4-
,. iACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF T
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM r.
')
INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT / CABLE SEPARATION - ACTION ITEM
. ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REY. m
' ~ ~ ' '
,M.lnt ig
- , T.'.
- ....s. ; ;f._sl
-...+... >,y -'
5 _
EQUIPMENT 10 M
DRAWING b
~
REV.
' ' r' REMARKS (cont'd)h h
.I f
i l
I I
l t
r-QI-004 REY.4 ATTACiflENT 4 Pags 1 of 1 SHEET OF
~
CPRT It;SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITDI I.b.1 REV._ b
,}
ACTION ITGi I.b.2 REV. (;,)
.h SUPPLEMENT SHEET y
INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 EQUIPMENT i b
SECTION W
'm o
DRAWING #
b REY.
h DCA's I4)
~
NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW.
- e
~
REMARKS:
l
\\
qI-004 REY 4 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 of 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b 2
-)
SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS.j; THE NUM8ERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED 8 LOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET. -
i 1.
Enter the current revision level.
2.
Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number.
3.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
4.
Enter all outstanding DCA's.
6.
List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section.
7.
Note any inspection comments.
~.
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE
& OO4 3
3/6/85 1 of 3 PROCEDURE FOR:
CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY:
dLs A 1*/
DATE 3/5/85 Evaluation Re e reh Corp.
DATE b (/ I 5 ~
APPROVED BY:
n/
4v
. valuation Research Corp.
APPROVED BY:
[
3 /S/K5'
_;w DATE R.T.L. Elec/Instrume 1.1 Office meno, 1/15/85 W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel
" Inspection Attributes for Action Items I b.1 and I.b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office meno, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,823) 1.3 Office memo, 2/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,854) 1.4 Office meno, 3/05/85, M. B. Jones to J. Hansel 1.5 Office meno, 2/22/85a W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization.
This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2.
2.2 The scope of this procedure is the cabling and wiring within selected control panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections is any interaction between safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wireway to vendor wireway (per Ref.
1.5).
NOTE:
The scope of this Quality Instruction may be expanded at the direction of the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES l
\\
Page 2 of 3
~
3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports.
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref. 1.1) to verify that:
ACTIVITY 1 -Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit, ENT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1, para. 3 and Ref. 1.5).
ACTIVITY 2 -Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.
1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3).
ACTIVITY 3 -Verify that wiring is separated in accordance with, Ref 1.1, para. 4, 5, Fig. I and Table 1 of Ref. 1.3.
-ACTIVITY 4 -Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum sepgration will be maintained (Ref. 1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3).
ACTIVITY 5 -The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref. 1.1, Note).
ACTIVITY 6 -Verify that " required" barriers are installed.
Note:
" Required" means either required by a design document, or indications that a barrier was installed but has been removed.
The inspector will state the location of nissing barriers and whether or not a separation violation has been created by the barrier's absence.
4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefsel wiring (Ref. 1.1, para.
I and Raf. 1.2).
4.3 DOCUMENTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs l
4.1 and 4.2.
4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results and inspections for para. 4.1 on the IR (Attachments 2 and 3, as applicable). For i
para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefsel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR.
Page 3 of 3
~
=
4.3 DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd) 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2, 3 and 4) shall be complaced in accordance with their respective completion instructions, as applicable. The inspector completing the report shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number. The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed IR shall be submittaa to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Teaa
' Leader for review and approval.
'4.3.4 All section a and b criteria blocks and inspection results blocks for panels ICB-10, ICB-11, XCV-01 and XCV-03 will be NA'd per Ref.
.4 1.1, para. 5.. All section c and d criteria and inspection results blocks shall be completed as appropriate.
.d; I
s
j yl-uus Nev. 3 ATTACHMEN.T 1 Page 1 Of 4 I
e.
s s' W l*l-.
I IIl
- inuN*s cavant ma N
- A*
Taasu ac' Ccu0us?
ftPitL Om NON TEFIEL TEFitL CAnti escu TE7itL CAsta DNrftd) casti DETall 1 A TEFIEL $ NON-TEFIEL CA8LES Jr)-- 4*t ll l
YnasN 8=
inuN *a..
CAsta CoWouiT Ta u M *A*
CDWOUIT DETAll 18 ALL TEFIEL CA8LES t.
FIGURE l
(NOTE a)
TYplCAL SEPMtATlou DETAILS FOR-a l'
I) ALL WIRING IN l*CS 10 ( l-CS II, AND CRCulTS LASTED
{
lu TABLE 1.
21 NON-TEFIEL WIRING IN ALL CONTROL SQUIDS ANO VER.
TICAL PNLS.
- 3) W4 RIMS IN SECTIONS C AMO O 0F ANY CONTit0L ECARD.,
NOTES
- 4) FORGEMGIAL uCTES,SEE Dwe 1325-E!*1702 02 NOTES 1,144
- 2) uct AFPUCAELE *D ANW::WCIA*CR LANPSOY CASLES AE0 CDAtlAL CRT CA8LES.
- 3) CDuculTS ARE RIGIO OR FLEXISLE.
- 4) ENCLossua THIS CARLE IN FLEXISLE CONOUlf #1LL NOT REQUCE SEPARAT'.QN SHOWM.
- 5) SEPLRATiou 6:ST1WCES SHOWN ApilLY tw ALL CI:itC:'!cuS (li, NORIZONTAL Au3 VERTICAL).
- 4) A031710NAL :E71LS ARE SHCW Ok Owd. 21 1.!! 17 1..2, CETill El A TdRU &l C.
'NI-004 REV 3 AT' TAC 19tE"NT 1 PAGE 2 0F 4 TA3~.I 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION RATED ltORI THAN 10 M4PS 1-C3.
Control Bd.-
Cable Cable Protsetive Device Device Train Number Tvee Volts Racine & Locacier
- K-ES-3164 C
NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-E3-3450 C
NK129045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-ES-4250A A
EG138987 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES -4251A B
EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2.
1-C3
- 1/L - APSIl A
EG138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1/1 - APSI2 5
EG139032 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2.
Handset Station C
IPA-CR30 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR29 075 1-CB-03.-
1-ES-4518A A
EG139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4519A B
EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 l
1-C3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APR31 A
EG135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR II.Al 1/1 - APRIZ 1
EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR IIA 2 Handset Station C
IPA-CP.29 075 Hanaset Station C
IPA-CR28 075 C
1PA-CR28A 051 ga g g tat g, y 1/1 - 1PCPX1 C
NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - 1PCPX2 C
NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - IPCPX3 C
NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 l-1/1 - IPCPX4 C
NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 l
- ' ' ^ '
+, -,,,,,, _.. _,, _ _
f i
,,,y:-"m utv.:3 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 3 0F 4.
T. u t.E 1 (Continued) 1-CB,
Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Type Volts Racine & Location 1/1 - AMCU C
NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter CE.,,
TBX-TRAHCU-0; 1/1 - APCH1 A'
EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 B
EG139338 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB See Note 3 Handset Station C
IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station C,
IPA-CR36 075 1-CB -
1 1-ES-2111A/B C
NKI39357 035 15Vdc (1') FWF 1A Control Box "ER" l
1-HS-2112A/B C
NK129367 035 15Vde (2) FWP la Control Box "ER" 1-HS-2111C
,C NK139358 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 10 1
1-HS-2112C C
NK139368 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-MS-2111D/E C
NK139359 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr. 1D,
1-HS-2112D/E C
NK139369 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.10 i
1-HS-3302 C
NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D,
I 1-HS-3299 C
NK139620 036 125Vdc 10A.Ckt. Bkr.-10; l
1-CE (Note 5) 1-HS-2225 C
NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C
NK139654 037 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A A
EG138895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-HS-2451A B
EG138949 231 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-RS-2452r AA AG138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED l 1-HS-2452G/H AA AG138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED 1-CS-10 Handset Station.
C IPA-CR36 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR36A 051 Handset Station C
1PA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 Handset Station C
IPA-CR37 075
- X-CV-01 Handset Station C
IPA-CR31 075 l
)
~.
,,QI-004 REV. 3 ATTACif4ENT 1 PAGE 4 0F 4 "A3*.I 1 (Conrinued)
Notes:
(1)
Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are fuse ratings (2)
There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control panel:
a) 120Vac,.15A circuit breaker in panelboard 1C2, Ckt. 97 h) 125vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. $12 Detailed information for 15vde power supply (See GE drawinct f
$125D443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available.
(3)
SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-H5-SPDS/P2500 Wirine have not been reviewed.
This wiring should be separated in accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria.
All auto / manual control stationa in Section B of CB-4, 5 and.6 (4) have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps.
The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and CB '
(5) have 26vde lama circuits fused at 15 amps.
'CB-08 C3-09 l-PK-507 1-rK-510 1-SK-509A 1-FK-520 1-5K-5095 1-rK-530 1-SK-509C 1-FK-540 1-FK-550 l
l
=
l l
1
~
l l
i l
i l
l
3 m,,m, - gg J
l CGHANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM
_ INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 REY. O and I.b.2 REV._ @
~
, ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONOUIT/ CABLE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT ID b
DRAWING (2)
REY. _ @
DCA's b
~
~
INSPECTION CRITERIA PANEL SECTIONS A & 8 h
i DCA's b PANEL SECTIONS C & D b
DCA's A INSPECTION RESULTS h A hB C&D ACT*
2 4
3
'l 4
5 I
6 4
REMARKS:
b INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b
DATE @
BADGE NO. @
REVIEW AND APPROVAL b
DATE b ERC Level III REVIEW AND APPROVAL h
DATE b Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L.
!j
QI,004 REY. 3 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 2 of 2 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS BLOCKS:
INSTRUCTION 1.
Enter current revision level.
2.
Enter equipment ID. drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as requirec 3.
Enter all appifcable inspection criteria. including revision levels, specific details as appropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading.
l 4.
A.
Sign and date the appropriate block (SAT /UNSAT) of each Panel Section column for each inspection activity performed in that Panel Section.
8.
If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the appropriate Panel Section.
5.
A.
Document all deficiencies (UNSATS) in a brief, clear manner and organized in outline fans.
Ex. Activity 1. Item 1 - (Deficiency description)
Item 2 - (Deficiency description)
B.
Enter applicable DCA's and any additional information necessary to clarify the inspection results. Attachment 3 may be used if more space is required.
6.
Inspection signature, date and badge number.
7.
Approval signature and date of ERC Level III.
8.
Approval signature and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
l
(
r
,---------,--p-,--,---,,--.--,---,.-,--,--~.,,r-.---,nn,,,en,,
QI-004 REV. 3 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONOUIT/ CABLE SEPARATION - ACTION ITEM ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REV. il v
EQUIPMENT ID h
h DRAWING REV.
REMARKS (cont'd)h h
4 i
a I.
l 4
4 W
o
- QI '004 REY. 3 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF CPRT It SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITE!! I.b.1 REY. O ACTION ITEli I b.2 REY. (;.)
SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 EQUIPMENT #
M SECTION (2')
DRAwIm #
CD REv.
(al DCA's (4 )
NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW.
O O
P G
REMARKS:
t 1 '
t
- l
- I i
w r,
-.-----.mm,
,m-.n.m--.e,n n,...,-.,
,,n,,..
,,,,,-,-,-e..m.._,
.-n,
,,--,,..e.--,.
m._,---,
,,n-..,,,,.,w--we e
QI-004 REV. 3 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 of k COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET.
1.
Enter the current revision level.
1 2.
Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number.
3.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
4.
Enter all outstanding DCA's.
6.
List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section.
7.
Note any inspection coments.
- l l
l l
l 1
+
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE 01-004 2
2/26/85 1
of 2 PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY:
b' DATE Al#6/f6 Evaluafio Res, rch Corporation APPROVED BY:
dr DATE 2. 26'. I r.
Evaluation Research Corporation APPROVED BY:
k
_!N DATE 2 26 Sf R.T.L.Sec/InstChmentagion
()
m J
1.0 REFERENCES
h 1.1 Office memo, 1/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel
" Inspection Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office memo, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,823) 1.3 Office memo, 2/15/85, W. I. Vocelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,854) 1.4 Office memo,1/17/85, W. I. Vogelsang to A. S. Hurbanek (CPP-17,746) 105 Office memo, 2/22/85, W. I. Vogelsano to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization.
This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2.
202 The scope of this procedure is the cabling and wiring within selected control 2-panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections i
is any interaction between safety related wiring and components and other safety related or non-safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wiring to vendor wireway (per Ref.1.5).
NOTE: The scope of this Quality Instruction may be expanded at the direction of the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES l
3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports.
The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and aporoval of the inspection reports.
[
QI-004'REV. 2 PAGE 2 of 2 a
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that:
ACTIVITY 1 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1, t
para. 3 and Ref. 1.5).
ACTIVITY 2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1. 3 ).
ACTIVITY 3 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para. 4 and 5 and Figure 1, Ref.1.3, Table 1 (Attachment 1).
ACTIVITY 4 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref.1.3).
ACTIVITY 5 - The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref.1.1, Note)..
ACTIVITY 6 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e.
brackets installed but no barriers, etc.), or if design drawings require barriers that are not installed, verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization (Ref.1.4).
ACTIVITY 7 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring installation / reinstallation of the barriers (Ref. 1.4).
4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefzel wiring (Ref.1.1, para,1 and Ref.1.2).
i.
4.3 DOCUMENTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perfonn activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2.
l 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para. 4.1 on l
the IR (Attachments 2 and 3, as applicable). For para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR.
4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2, 3 and.4) shall be completed in accordance with their respective completion instructions, as applicable. The inspector com-plating the report shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number. The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III.
The completed IR shall be submitted to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader for review and approval.
V
41-U94 stev. 2 ATTACHMEN.T 1
" Page 1 of 4
.e y..
~
.I ga k.a rL s
lll 4
".,c 7,.
- tamm*acasar main 'a*
Taasa eca causer Tartu em
.mou fastat tsra L case.a es0W-ftFIEL CaaLS DesTE4) caaLa t
DETAIL l A TEFIEL $ NON-TEFIEL CA8LES
-Jr)--W
~
e ll l
Taans'a*
Tnasu as*,
cASLE.
cDWouif raum A-cnueur DETAIL 18 i
j Au. TErzEt. castes FIGURE 1
(note a)
Tymcat sanutariou ocTuts Fon-e) An womme m I-cs-to ( t <s a, AND CRCUITS LISTED m imaLE S.
l e uen-TErtEL winnein Au comet scannS auavan-i t
T' Cat aS-a wouun mescnous e no o orany courner, acaan,
c J
.~
j.
NOTES 4 FOREllEDLNOTES,$1E OWS 2323 El.170102 NOTES 4.1 $ 4
- 2) WCT18PUCtaLE *D mutixCATC2 LAMPtor CAELES Asie CDAu&L CRT CASLES.
W CDelbalTS ARE RI640 OR FLEXISLE.
- 4) thCLOSne6 TIIIS CARLS IN FLEIISLE CONotilf #1LL NOT REDUCE SEDhEAT 3M SHOWN.
S) SEP&RATigu 6:STahGS SucWu App (y su att aztc:agg (ti, NOAltshlTAL Aus vtRTICAL).
41 AD3mostAL :E ALLS ail SNCW4 Ok Omd. 21:1.E!.i?:1.;2, CET M L M A TeiR U 44 C l
i
J
,.41-004 REY. 2 ATTAC19 TENT 1 PAGE 2 0F 4 TA3 E 1 CIRCUITS WITN PROTECTION i
RATED RORE THAN 10 AMPS 1-C3 i Control Bd.-
Cable Cable Protective Devic Device Train Number Tvoe Volts Racine & Locacic
- R-ES-3264 C
NE139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-Es-3450 C
NE129045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LA2 1-RS-4250A A
M138987 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 1 1-ES-4251A 3
EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAZ.
1-CE.
1/1 - APSIL A
N138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1/1 - APSI2 5
EG139031 237 125vde 30A, SWGR LEA 2.
075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR30 Handset Station C
IPA-CR29 075 1-cs 1-ES-4518A A
N139466 137 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4519A E
EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 I
1-c3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APRE1 A
N135550 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EAL I
1/1 - APRE1 R
EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 2 Handset Station C
1PA-CP.29 075 Hanoset Station C
IPA-CR28 075 C
IPA-CR20A 051 l
Haggtagg, 43 1/1 - 1PCPX1 C
NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - LPCPX2 C
NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C
NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 l
1/1 - IPCPX4 C
NR139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 l
\\
i l
w =mu a PAGE J OF 4
.'s
..' t
.4 TACLE 1 (Continu:d) 1-CB (
'. Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train... Number
,, Type Volts Racine s Locatier 1/1 - ANCU C
NE139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter Csh, TBX-TRANCU-d' 1/1 - APCH1 A*
EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 5
EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB.
See Note 3 Handset Station C
1PA-CR35 075 Handset Station C,
IPA-CR36 075 1-CE -
i 1-Es-2111A/B C
NEI39357 035 157dc (2) FNFIk l
Control sox *Ena 1-HK-2112A/B C
NE139367
- 035 15Vdc (2) PWP 13 Control Box "EH*
l 1-HS-2111C
,C NE139358 035 125vde 20A Ckt. Skr. ID*
i 1-HS-2112C C
BE139368 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. skr. 1D:
1-HS-2111D/E.
C NEI39359 036 125Vde 20A Ckt. Skr. 10:
1-RS-2112D/E C
WE139369
,,036 125Vdc 20 A Ckt. Bkr.1D*
1-H5-3302 C
NE139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D*
[l:
1-H5-3299 C
NE139620 036 125Vde 10A.Ckt Ekr. 1D*.
l l l 1-CB (Note 5) 1-HS-2225
,C NE139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWCR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C
NE139654 037.
125Vde 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A A
EGI38895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-HS-2451A B
EG138949 231 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-HS-2452F AA AG138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr.1E01 1-HS-2452G/H AA A4138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1EDI 1-CS-10 i
Handset Station.
C IPA-CR36 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR36A 051 l
Handset Station C
1PA-CR37 075 i
1-CB-11 l
Handset Station C
IPA-CR37 075 l
- X-CV-01 i Handset Station C
IPA-CR31 075 o
. Al-G04 R.EV. 2 dACEM 1 PME 4 0F 4 s
TA3* I 1_ (Cc..-inue,d)
.4..[b, g,.m,.
g.
, g.,
j Noees_:
- s..y:3 Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings.are (1) fuse ratings There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control (2) l panel a) 120Vac,4 15A circuit breaker in panelboard 1C1, Ckt. 97 b) 115hde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. pli Detailed information for 15vde power supply (See GE drawing
$125D443BE, 7.0. #CP-0005) not available.
SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-R5-5705/P2500 Kirine (3) have not been reviewed.
This wiring should be separated in accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria.
All auto / manual control stations in Section 3 of CB-4, 5 and.6 (4) have 16Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps.
The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and G '
~
(5) have 26vde lamo circuits fused a:t 15 emps.
'CB-08 C3-09 I
1-PK-507 1-FK-510 lj 1-5K-509A 1-FK-520 1-SK-5095 1-FK-530 1-5K-509C 1-FK-540 1-FK-550 e
B e
1 l
1 j
~
'N W
.QI-004 REY. 2
~
,y n
t s;h -
COMANCHE FEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS I,b.1 REY. O and I.b.2 REY._ (5)
- ITEM DESCRIPTION
- FLEKl3LE CON 00!T TO FLEXIBLE CONOUIT/CA8LE SEPARATION 7
!"t.
EQUIPMENT 10 M
ORAWING S
_ REY. _ M
,, m INSPECTION CRITERIA l
PANEL SECTIONS A 4 8' DCA's b l
PANEL SECTIONS C & O b
i i
CCA's A v
INSPECTION RESULTS @
AhB C< iD ACT*
[
1 2
- j-3 i
l' 4
f 5
6 I:ll 7
REMARK 5:
b l
i j
INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b
DATE h BADGEN0.@
l, REVIEW AND APPROVAL b
OATE b ERC Level III REVIEW AND APPROVAL b
DATE h Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L.
i l
')
- QI 004 REY. 2 ATTACHMENT 2 PMiE 2 a 2
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TENi - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS BLOCKS:
INSTRUCTION q
~-
1.
Enter current revision level.
I 2.
Enter equipment ID, drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as requiret 3.
Enter all appifcable inspection criteria, including revision levels, specific detail:
as appropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading.
4.
A.
Sign and date the appropriate block (SAT /UNSAT) of each panel Section column for each inspection activity performed in that Panel Section.
B.
If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the, appropriate Panel Section.
5.
A.
Document all deficiencies (UNSATS) in a brief, clear menner and organfied in outline form.
Ex. Activity 1. Item 1-(Deficiencydescription)
Item 2 - (Deficiency description) 8.
Enter applicable DCA's and any additional information necessary to clarify the inspection results. Attachment 3 may be used if more space is required.
6.
Inspection signature, date and badge number.
T 7.
Approval signature and date of ERC Level III.
8.
Approval signature and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader.
l l
l l
j l
l
.e
QI-004 REY. 2 TACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF -
i COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT / CABLE SEPARATION - ACTION ITE ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REV.m v
- 4 EQUIPMENT ID h
h DRAWING REY.
REMARKS (cont'd)h h
l l
s]
e,,,
- hldO4 AEV. '2 ATTAC41ENT 4 Paga 1 of 1 SHEET OF CPRT It SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I.b.1 REV. b ACTION ITEti I.b.2 REY. (..)
SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE 4.2 EQUIPMENT f b
SECTION ORm!= f REv.
m oC4.
m NON-TEFZEL WIR! m IS IDENTIFIED BELOW.
Q e
4 L
Q l
F l-1 I
l
r QI-004 REY. 2 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 of 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET.
1.
Enter the current revision level.
2.
Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number.
3.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
4.
Enter all outstanding DCA's.
6.
List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section.
7.
Note any inspection comments.
t
r 7, 3 0..L COMACNHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUED DATE PAGE QI-004 1
2/18/85 10F 2 PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION I EM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY:
/
DATE O2 /8 85 s
Evaluatfo es rch Corporation APPROVED BY:
?-
DATE
/#
e //fr.
Eval tion Research Corporation
{/
APPROVED BY:
NM k
k.
DATE 18 1465 R.1.L. El /Instruptatig C
1.0 REFERENCES
b V
i NT?sh,, [1 1.1 Office memo,1/15/85, W.I. Vogelsang to J.L. Hansel
" Inspection Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2".
(CPP17,721) 1.2 Office riemo, 2/1/85, W.I. Vogelsang to M.B. Jones (CPP 17,823) f l) 1.3 Office memo, 2/15/85. W.I. Vogelsang to M.B. Jones (CPP 17,854) lj 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the method by which to ensure that required separation is maintained within specific Main Control room pane'Is and that no separation barriers have been removed with-out authorization. This is in direct support of the CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2.
2.2 The scope of this Quality Instruction is to verify by inspection, that required separation is maintained and that no separation barriers have been removed without authorization.
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third part inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspec-tions and for completion of inspection reports.
The Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports.
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that:
ACTIVITY #1 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para 2 and Ref.1.3) 1 ACTIVITY #2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref.1.3) 1 J
QI-004 REV.1 p*:E 2 0F 2 4.1' (cont.)
ACTIVITY #3 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring
-is routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel-(Ref. 1.1, para 3).
NOTE: If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is not routed in rigid conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channels, N/A Activities 3 and 4 and complete Activity 5.
ACTIVITY #4 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 1 inch from safety related components (Ref. 1.1, para 3).
ACTIVITY #5 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1, para 3).
NOTE:. If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel, N/A Activity 5 and complete Activities 3 and 4.
ACTIVITY #6 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para 4 and 5 and Figure 1. Ref.1.3 Table 1 (ATTACitiENT 1) l NOTE: Inspector shall note the specific drawing and detail used for verifi-cation in the appropriate block of the I.R.
ACTIVITY #7 - The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref.1.1, Note).
ACTIVITY #8 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e. brackets installed but no tarriers, etc.), or if design t
drawings require barriers that are not installed, verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization.
ACTIVITY.#9 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring installtion/ reinstallation of the barrier (s).
l 4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefzel wiring (Ref.1.1, para 1 and Ref. 1.2) 4.3 DOCUMENTATION
.4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2.
4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para. 4.1 on the I.R. (Attachment 2). For para 4.2 the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 supplement sheet and attach the fann to the appropriate I.R.
4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2 and 4) shall be completed in accor-dance with Attachments 3 and 5, as applicable. The I.R. 's shall be re-viewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed I.R. shall be submitted to the Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader for review and approval.
4 J
e-QI-004 R;v. 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 4 j
u e vru I
IIl TRAIN *S' COWIWIT TRAIN'A' TRAIN 'C' COWoulf Tapitt on wow-Test EL Tera EL cAaLE NON*TEFIEL CASLE Osoftd)
CAaLE DETAIL 1A TEFZEL $ NON-TEFZEL CA8LES
- I ri--i 1 t--
i i i l TRAIN *S' TRAIN *S' CASLE coupu 7 TR AIN
- A' ccWouir DETAll iB ALL TEFIEL CABLES FIGURE i
(NOTE 2)
TYDICAL SEPlutATION DETAILS FOR-
- 1) ALL WIRIN6 IN 1 C810 ( l CS II. AND CIRCulTS LISTED IN TABLE 1
- 2) NON-TEFZEL WIRING IN ALL CONTROL 80AR05 AND VER-TICAL PNLS.
- 3) WIRING IN SECTIONS C AWO O OF ANY CONTROL SCARD.,
NOTES
- 1) FOR 6ENERAL NOTES,SEE Dwe 1323 El 1702 02 NOTES 3.144.
- 2) NOT APPUCiBLE *O AhwL'NCIATCR tAMPBor CABLES AND COAXIAL CRT CA8LES.
- 3) CON 00lTS ARE RIGIO OR FLEXtBLE
- 4) ENCLOSING THIS CABLE IN FLEXISLE CON 00lf #tt,L l
NOT REOUCE SEPARAT'ON SHOWN.
S) SEPARAflou 6:STigES SHOWN APDLY IN AI,L Cl2(C;0NS (IE, WORIIONTAL A40 VERTICAi.)
- 6) AD0i! ION AL ;E AILS ;41 SA:WW Ok :*d In3 E! i701.;1' CETill fel A TdRU si C i
-]
c.
QI-004 REY.1 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 0F 4
\\
TABLE 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION RATED.MORE THAN 10 AMPS 1-CB Control Bd.
Cable Cable Protective Device Dr.vice Train Number Tyce Volts Rating & Location K-ES-3264 C
NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-58-3450 C
NK119045 036 I25Vdc 30A, SWGR 113 1-ES-4250A A
E9138987 137 125Vde 30A, SNGR 1EA1 1-ES -4251A B
EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAZ 1-C3 1/1 - APSII A
E9138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGE.IEA1 1/1 - APSI2 B
EG139032 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2.
Handset Station C
IPA-CR30 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR29 075 1-cs-03 --
1-ES-4518A A
E0139466 137 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-ES-4519A B
EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 i
143 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APREL A
EG135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1/1 - APR52 B
EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 Handset Station C
IPA-CR29 075 Hanaset Station-C IPA-CR28 075 Hagegtatig C
IPA-CR28A 051 1/1 - LPCPX1 C
NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - iPCPX2 C
NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C
NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C
NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4
- )
E~-
]
QI-004 REV.1 ATTA ENT 1 PE3&4 TABLE I'(Continued) 1-CB Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Type Volts Racine &' Location 1/1 - AHCU C
NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter Cab, TBX-TRAHCU-0i 1/1 - APCH1 A'
EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR leal-1/1 - APCH2 B
EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB '
See Note 3 Handset Station C
IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR36 075 1-CB -
1-HS-2111A/R C
NKI39357 035 15Vdc
( 2') FWP 1A' Control. Bose,"ER*
I-RS-2112A/B C
NK139367 035 15Vde (2) FWP 18 Control Box "EH' 1-HS-2111C C
NK13S358 035 125vde 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D2-1-HS-2112C C
NK139368 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 102-l 1-HS-2111D/E C
NK139359 036 125vde 20A Ckt Bkr. 102-l 1-HS-2112D/E C
NK139369 036 125vda 20A Ckt. Skr.102-1-HS-3302 C
NK139366 037 125vde 20A Ckt Skr. 1D2-1-HS-3299 C
NK139620 036 125Vde 10A Ckt. Bkr.1D2-1-CB (Note 5) 1-HS-2225 C
NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A,. SWGR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C
NK139654 037 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A A
EGI38895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS-2451A B
EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-HS-2452F AA AG138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1EDL-1-RS-2452G/H AA AQ138622 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr. IED1-1-CS-10 I
Handset Station.
C 1PA-CR36 075 Handset Station C
IPA-CR36A 051 Handset Station C
1PA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 l
Handset Station C
IPA-CR37 075 l
X-CV-01 l
Handset Station C
IPA-CR31 075
~..-
LQI-904 REV.1 ATTACENENT 1 PAGE 4 0F 4 TABLE 1 (Continued)
)
Notes:
(1)
Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are fuse ratings (2)
There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control panelt a) 120Vac, 15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt. 67 b) 125Vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. til Detailed information for 15Vde power supply (See GE drawing
$125D443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available.
(3)
SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-HS-SPDS/P2500 Wirine have not been reviewed.
This wiringr should be separated in accordanca with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria.
(4)
All auto / manual control stations in Section B of CB-4, 5.and 6 have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps.
(5)
The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and CB '
have 26Vdc lamo circuits. fused at 15 amps.
CB-08 CB-09 1-PK-507 1-FK-510 1-SK-509A 1-FK-520 1-SK-5098 1-FK-530 1-SK-509C 1-FK-540 1-FK-550 SPM:see
.tj
e QI-004, REY. 1 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 10F A SHEET l 0F 1
C0HANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I.b.1 DRAFT b REY.
1 ACTION ITEM I.b.2 DRAFT
/T\\
REY.
v ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT SEPARATION AND FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO CA8LE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT #
ORAWING f b
REVISION DCA's M
INSPECTI0ff ATTRIBUTES - 4.1 SECTION/
ACT.1 ACT.2 ACT.3 ACT.4 ACT.5 ACT.6 DWG./
ACT.7 ACT.8 ACT.5 INSP. SIGN./
APPI PANEL 5
J 5 U 5 U S U 5 U 5
U DETAIL 5
U 5 U 5 U DATE DCA b
b M
9 1 h
- b. { 2)
O (k
k k
h_
d_8) l I
l h
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR S
DATE BADGE #
w REVIEW AND APPROVAL I2id DATE
~
Evaluation Rfsearch Corportation REVIEW AND APPROVAL DATE l
Electrical / Instrumentation R.T.L.
i D
c QI-004 hEV. 1 ATTACMENT 3 PAGE 1 0F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I,b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPONO TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE INSPECTION RECORD.
1.
Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item I.b.1.
2.
Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item I.b.2.
3.
Enter the Equipment or Panel ID number.
4.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
5.
Enter all outstanding DCA's against the drawing.
6.
Enter the appropriate Section or Panel ID.
7.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 1.
8.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 2.
9.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 3.
4 10.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 4.
(
11.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 5.
12.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or. UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 6.
13.
Enter drawing and detail used for Activity 6 verification.
14.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 7.
15.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 8.
16.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 9.
17.
Inspectors Signature and Date Inspection was performed.
18.
Enter applicable DCA's 19.
Describe unsatisfactory items and any other inspection comments.
20.
Inspection Signature, Date and Badge number.
21.
Approval Signature and Date of ERC Level III.
22.
Approval Signature and Date of R.T.L. Elec./ Instrumentation.
r 1QI-0,04 REV. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 PAGE 10F 1 CPRT INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I.b.1 DRAFT REV.
ACTION ITEM I,b.2 DRAFT REV.
SUPPLEMENT SHEET
' INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE '- 4.2 EQUIPMENT #
SECTION DRAWING #
REY.
DCA's-NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW.
REMARKS:
i I
i' '
l i
i o
6
QI-004 REV. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 0F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I,b.1 and I,b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT S 1.
Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item I.b.1.
2.-
Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item I.b.2 3.
Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number.
4.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
5.
Enter all outstanding DCA's 6.
List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section.
7.
Note any inspection connents.
o,
^
- v. ss. /
\\
r COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION NO.
REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE QI-004 0
1/18/85 1 0F 2 PROCEDURE FOR: Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation (I.b.1) and F1 xible Conduit to Cable Separation (I.b.2) g6 PREPARED BY:
d I [#E' d5ldl ATE
///1/[6 Eval tion Research Corporation APPROVED BY:
oM I. [Of4d/
OATE
/ 7C Tvaluati Re earch Corporation s
APPRCVED BY:
MI8h8V fb7k DATE R.T.L. Eld:/Insgegtation
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Office memo,1/15/85, W.I. Vogel rg j
3' 1 "In ip Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2'
,)h f,
2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE bE &
$11.
2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the method by which
to ensure that required separation is maintained within specified Main Control room panels and that no separation barriers have been removed with-out authorization. This is in direct support of the CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2.
2.2 The scope of this Quality Instruction is to verify by inspection, that required seoarction is maintained and that no separation barriers have been remor A without authorization.
3.0 RESP 0aSIBILITIES 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspec-tions and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports.
l 4.0 INSTRUCTION l
i 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that:
Activity #1 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para. 2).
Activity #2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para.2).
Activity #3 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel (Ref.1.1, para 3).
i
'QI-004 REV. 0
'PAGE 2 0F 2
' 4.1
- (cont. )
. NOTE:
'If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channels, N/A Activities 3 and 4 and complete Activity 5.
Activity #4 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring ~
routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 1 inch from safety related components (Ref. 1.1, para 3).
Activity #5 ' Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components. (Ref.1.1, para 3).
NOTE:
If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel, N/A Activity 5 and complete Activities 3 and 4.
Activity #6 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para 4 and 5. Table 1 and Figure 1 (Attachment 1)..
NOTE:
Inspector shall note the specific drawing and detail used for verift-cation in the appropriate block of the I.R.
Activity #7 - The correct type barrier material is installed. (Ref.1.1, Note).
Activity #8 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e. brackets installed but no barriers, etc.), or if design drawings require barriers that are not installed, verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization.
Activity #9 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring installation /reinsta11ation of the barrier (s).
4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify.all non-Tefzel wiring (Ref.1.1, para 1).
l 4.3 DOCUMENTATION i
4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2.
4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para 4.1 on the I.R. (Attachment 2).
For para 4.2, the Quality Inspectors 1
j shall identify non-Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 supplement sheet and l
attach the form to the appropriate I.R.
4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2 and 4) shall be completed in accor-dance with Attachments 3 and 5, as applicable. The I.R.'s shall be re-F viewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC l
Level III. The completed I.R. shall be submitted to the Electrical /Instru-l mentation Review Team Leader for review and approval.
I
.)
/
yl-vve nev. U ATTACHMENT 1 Pag 21 of 4 I
l l
W 6*
L J l*L--
1 II!
tamNea'tampf TRAIN'A' TRAIM 'C' CON 00tf ftPTEL OR won TEFIEL ftFIEL CA4tt Nose TEPIEL Catts (sooftel Casts DETAIL IA t
TEFIEL $ NON-TEFIEL CA8LES A (} y g L j
ll lI i
TRAIN *&*
TRMN
- S' CABLE COWOUlf TRMN*A*
1 Coueust
\\
DETAIL 18 ALL TEFIEL CABLES FIGURE t
(note a)
TYPICAL SEPMIATION DETAILS FOR-
- 1) ALL WIRING 1N 1*CS id"( l CS II. AND CIRCUITS LISTED IN TABLE 1.
- 2) NON-TEFIEL WIRINGIN ALL CONTROL 80ARDS ANOVER-TICAL PNLS.
- 3) WIRiise IN SECTIONS C ANO O 0F ANY CONTROL 80Mt0.,
NOTES
- 1) FOR GEllERAL HOTES,5dE Owe 2323 El IT02 02 NorES I.1 $ e.
- 1) NOT APPLIC18'.E m ANNL'WClATCR LAMPBOY CA8LES AND CDA11AL, CRT CASLES.
- 1) CON 0ulTS ARE RIGIO OR FLEXISLE
- 4) ENCLOSING'THl$ CAELE IN FLEXIBLE CCN0ulf #1LL NOT REDUCE SEPARATRN SHOWN.
S) SEPARATION dlSTAkCES SMcWN APD(Y tN ALL Cl1[ CONS (li, h0RIZONTAL ab3 '.ERTICAL,)
- 6) A001!10?4AL E71LS ARE SA;wN Ok 044 21:1 !! 47:1 *1, CETAIL &l A TdRU of C.
.. J
QI-004' REV. 0 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 4 TABLE 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION RATED.MORE THAN 10 AMPS 1-CB Control Bd.
Cable Cable Protective Device 4 Device Train Number Type Volts Rating & Locatior X-HS-3264 C
NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-HS -3 450 C
NK139045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-HS -4250A A
E9138987 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS -4251A B
EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB '
1/1 - APSIl A
E9138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APSI2 B
EG139032 237 125 Vile 30A, SWGR,1EA2 1-CB 1-HS-4518A A
E9139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS-4519A B
EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB (Note 4) 1/1 - APRH1 A
E9135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 l
1/1 - APRH2 B
EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB (Note 4) 1/1 - iPCPX1 C
NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - 1PCPX2 C
NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C
NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C
NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 P
I L
I QI-004 ~REV. 0 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 4 TABLE 1 (C ntinuCd) 1-CB Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Type Volts Ratincr & Location 1/1 - AHCU C
NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter Cab, TBX-TRANCU-01 1/1 - APCH1 A
E0139308 137 125Vdc M,
SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 B
EG139338 237 125Vdc
/, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB See-Note 3 1-CB-08 1-ES-2111A/B C
NK139357 035 15vde (2) FWP 1A Control Box "EH" 1-HS-2112A/B C
NK139367 035 15Vdc (2) FWP IB Control Box "EH" 1-HS-2111C C
NK139358 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-HS-2112C C
NK139368 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-HS-2111D/E C
NK139359 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-HS-2112D/E C
NK139369 036 125Vds 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-HS-3302 C
NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-HS-3299 C
NK139620 036 125Vdc 10A Ckt. Bkr. 1D 1-CB (Note 5) 1-HS-2225 C
NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, S GR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C
NK139654 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A-.
A E0138895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS-2451A B
EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-HS-2452F AA A0138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED 1-!!S-2 4 52G/H AA A0138622 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED e
f yt-uus KtV.O ATTACHMENT 1 Pag 2 4 of 4 TA8LE 1 (Continu:d) l Notes:
(1)
Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are fuse ratings (2)
There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control panels a) 120Vac, 15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt. 67 b) 125Vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. 412 Detailed information for 15Vdc power supply (See GE drawing
- 125D443BE, P.O. GCP-0005) not available.
(3)
SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-RS-SPDS/P2500 Wiring have not been reviewed.
This wiring should be separated in accordance with paragraph 3B of the inspection criteria.
(4)
All auto / manual control stations in Secti'on 3 of CB-4, 5 and 6
~
have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps.
(5)
The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and h-09 have 26Vdc lamo circuits fused at 15 amps.
CB-08 CB-09 1-PK-507 1-FK-510 1-3K-509A 1-FK-520 1-SK-5098 1-FK-530 1-SK-509C 1-FK-540 1-FK-550 SPM:see
r
-)
Qt-004. REVo O ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 10F o SHEET
_1_
0 F C0HANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM
!!1SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I,b.1 ORAFT b REV.
ACTION ITEM I.b.2 DRAFT m
REY.
v ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT SEPARATION AND FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO CABLE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT #
DRAWING f h
REVISION DCA's M
INSPECTI0ft ATTRIBUTES - 4.1 SECTION/
ACT.1 ACT.2 ACT.3 ACT.4 ACT.5 ACT.6 DWG./
ACT.7 ACT.8 ACT.5 INSP. SIGN./
APPL PANEL 5
3 5 U 5 U 5
U 5 U 5 U DETAIL 5 U 5
U 5 U DATE DCA'
@ T 8 8
R REMARKS:
h
\\
INSPECTOR S
DATE BADGE #
REVIEW All0 APPROVAL (20 DATE Evaluation Rtrsearch Corportation j
l REVIEW Afl0 APPROVAL DATE l
Electrical / Instrumentation R.T.L.
L a
(
QI-004
- REY.-0 ATTACHMENT 3 PAGE 10F 1 i
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE INSPECTION RECORD.
1.
Enter Draf t and/or Revision of Action Item I.b.1.
2.
Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item I,b.2.
3.
Enter the Equipment or Panel ID number.
4.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
5.
Enter all outstanding DCA's against the drawing.
6.
Enter the appropriate Section or Panel ID.
7.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTOPY for Activity 1.
8.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 2.
9.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 3.
10.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 4.
11.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 5.
12.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 6.
13.
Enter drawing and detail used for Activity 6 verification.
14.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 7.
15.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 8.
16.
Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 9.
17.
Inspectors Signature and Date Inspection was performed.
18.
Enter applicable DCA's 19.
Describe unsatisfactory items and any other inspection comments.
20.
Inspection Signature Date and Badge number.
21.
Approval Signature and Date of ERC Level III.
22.
Approval Signature and Date of R.T.L. Elec./ Instrumentation.
l a
f g!-004. REY.'O ATTACHMENT 4 PAGE 1 0F 1 CPRT INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM !.b.1 ORAFT REY.
ACTION ITEM !.b.2 DRAFT f'l REV.
v SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 EQUIPMENT #
SECTION h
DRAWING #
REY.
DCA's h
NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW.
V 7
2 REMARKS:
b
(
(
QI-004 REVo 0 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 0F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEE 1.
Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item I,b.1.
2.
Enter the Draft and/or Rey, of Action Item I.b.2 3.
Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number.
4.
Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number.
5.
Enter all outstanding DCA's 6.
List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section.
7.
Note any inspection comments.
- e 8
i a
_a
~
COLKETED USHHC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 17 MNt 23 N1 14 I,
R. K. Gad III, ont of the attorneys for the Applicants herein, hereby certify that on March 20, 1987, I h ds! M ihd[.of BRANCH the within document by mailing copies thereof, postage prepaid, to:
Peter B. Bloch, Esquire Mr. James E. Cummins Chairman Resident Inspector Administrative Judge Comanche Peak S.E.S.
Atomic Safety and Licensing c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory-Board Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory P.O.
Box 38 Commission Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Walter H. Jordan Ms. Billie Pirner Garde
' Administrative Judge Midwest Office 881 W. Outer Drive 3424 N. Marcos Lane Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Appleton, WI 54911 Chairman Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Lawrence J.
Chandler, Esquire Mrs. Juanita Ellis Office of the Executive President, CASE Legal Director 1426 S. Polk Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Dallas, Texas 75224 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 t
f Renea Hicks, Esquire Ellen Ginsberg, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Environmental Protection Division Board Panel P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Austin, Texas 78711 Washington, D.C.
20555 Anthony Roisman, Esquire Mr. Lanny A. Sinkin Executive Director Christic Institute Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 1324 North Capitol Street 2000 P Street, N.W.,
Suite 611 Washington, D.C.
20002 Washington, D.C.
20036 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom Mr. Robert D. Martin Administrative Judge Regional Administrator 1107 West Knapp Region IV Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 1000 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Arlington, Texas 76011 Elizabeth B. Johnson Geary S. Mizuno, Esq.
Administrative Judge Office of the Executive Oak Ridge National Laboratory Legal' Director P.O. Box X, Building 3500 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Washington, D.C.
20555 Nancy Williams Cygna Energy Services, Inc.
101 California Street
-Suite 1000 San Francisco, California 94111
(
)
-d4..
gt -
R. K. Gad IIf j
l f
h/4 y
l ll