ML20238F419
| ML20238F419 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom, Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1998 |
| From: | Geoffrey Edwards PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9809030353 | |
| Download: ML20238F419 (23) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ttition Eupport DepartmInt 10CFR26.71(d)
=
PECO NUCLEAR reco eme.c-965 Chesterbrook Boulevard A U' nit of PECO Energy Wayne. PA 19 @ 7-6691 August 24,1998 Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 50-352 50-353 License Nos. DPR-44 DPR-56 NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data for the Period January 1998 through June 1998
Dear Sir / Madam:
As required by 10CFR26.71(d), this letter submits the performance data for PECO Energy's Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Program for the period January 1998 through June 1998. The data for our Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, and Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 a id 2, sites are provided in Attachments 1 and 2. Data for our Corporate Office and PECO Nuclear Headquarters specimen collection sites (i.e.,2301 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, and 965 Chesterbrook Boulevard, Wayne, PA, respectively) are provided in.
The data are reported on the January 1992 revision of the FFD Performance Data form provided by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), formerly the Nuclear Management and Resources Council j
- (NUMARC), and include the following.
/
Drugs tested for and cut-off levels.
N Workforce population tested.
/
Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, for-cause, random, follow-up, and other types of tests).
Substances identified.
9809030353 980824 PDR ADOCK 05000277 i
R PDR l
t
August 24,1998 Paga 2 Attachments 1,2, and 3 also include the following.
A summary of management actions.
Analysis of the data and appropriate actions that have been taken.
Random testing rate.
During this period, there was one significant event reported to the NRC in accordance with 10CFR26.73. Additionalinformation regarding this event is contained in Attachment 1.
If you have any questions or require additionalinformation, please contact us.
Very truly yours, b
Garrett D. Edwards Director-Licensing Attachments cc:
H. J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC (w/ attachments)
A. C. McMurtray, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS (w/ attachments)
A. L. Burritt, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS (w/ attachments) l i
j i
l
ATTACHMENT 1 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 i.
1 Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data l
January 1998 through June 1998 i
I l
l.
e Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 PECO ENERGY COMPANY JUNE 30, 1998-comoany a uenr4 Ending 1
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Locanon DAVID M. SARLEY (215) 841-5703 Con:2c Name Phone (inctuce area ccee)
CutoMs: Screen / Confirmation n (ng'ml)
O Appendix A te 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 f 15 Amphetamines 1000 500 j
f Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine
- 25 / 25
/
Opiates 300 / 300 Alechol(% BAC) 0.04 f
Testing Results Long-Term Short-Term Ucensee Employees Centractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with I Unescorted Access 2213 1194 E
Categories -
Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 32 0
217 2
[
Post accident 4
0 4-0 0
h Observed behavior 2
0 0
0 Random 244 0
126 0
'1 l
Follow up 8
0 21 0
Other.
4 0
1 0
Total 294 0
369 2
REV.1/92
4 3
2 1
lats s e uT 0
o 0
fe o l
t I
4 lo s
h e
o c
lc 0
o 0
n A
a ts
-ye b
c n O
6i u
6d 0
o 0
E S
h 5c P
c if i
s c
e e h n e
pi 0
o 0
p mm S
Af a e
ro e
O O
f se O
t s
a 0
o 0
t lp se O
T e
e v
n i
ia 0
1 1
t c
i o
s C
oP an d
a e
u j
0 1
1 m
ira r
M ifno s
s r
ro C
s o
t e
tc c
f e
a a
o y
r tr o
tn n
n lp o
o w
m C
C E
o m
m d
'e r
r e
e e
k s
T-T-
a n
0 t
l r
e e
n o
t a
c r
o h
o iL L
S T
B
l Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station January-June 1998 i
1 1.
- Initiatives Taken The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted during the period by PECO Energy Company's drug sniffing canine teams as well as investigations and interviews used to confirm information about lilicit activities at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS).
1
- a.. January 9,1998 - Notified that a contractor granted unescorted access had tested positive for cocaine. Unescorted access was denied.
- b. January 10,1998 - Notified by Site Security that a member of the general public was detained by a Pennsylvania Fish Commission Deputy due to possession of suspected marijuana within the owner controlled area. Individual was advised that he is not to return to PECO Enerav property.
l March 3,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
c.
Contractor admitted 1995 arrest for possession of drug paraphernalia as well as past drug use (1995). Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
d.
May 15,1998 - An individual requesting to remain anonymous alleged that an employee and a non-nuclear employee were involved in drug distribution and use. On May 27,1998, Corporate Security performed a canine sweep of the Administration Building Chemistry Laboratory; Pearl Building Chemistry Laboratory and Count Room; Chemistry Technician's Office; and, two vehicles assigned to the Chemistry Department. Fourteen (14) activation's were noted. Two (2) forensic samples, (i.e., cotton swabs of a piece of plexiglass and a glass vile) were obtained from the count room and delivered for forensic laboratory analysis. On June 16,1998, Corporate Security received notification that the presence of cocaine was detected in the glass vial. On June 16,1998, the nuclear employee was interviewed. The employee denied illegal drug use. On June 17,1998, the non-nuclear employee was interviewed. The employee also denied illegal drug use. For-cause testing of the individuals was negative. In an attempt to ascertain the responsible party and origin of the tainted vial, Corporate Security conducted 36 follow-up interviews with employees and vendor personnel assigned to the Chemistry area. No additional information was developed, June 4,1998 - Notified by Site Security that the remains of a suspected marijuana cigarette e.
were found in the Unit 3 fan room,195' elevation. The suspected contraband was delivered for forensic laboratory analysis. On June 5,1998, Corporate Security performed a canine sweep of the 195' elevation fan room area. One (1) activation was noted in the vicinity where the suspected contraband was discovered. On June 8,1998, notification was received that the partially charred, hand rolled cigarette contained marijuana. The origin of the marijuana and the responsible party is unknown.
f.
June 8,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
Contractor admitted 1994 drug related distribution charge as well as past drug use.
Contractor provided proof of rehabilitation. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
i' L
g.
June 26,1998 - Follow-up team sweep of the second floor, Pearl Building Chemistry storage area, HVAC room, and the second floor of the Administration Building Chemistry Storage area. Six (6) activation's noted. No forensic samples taken.
11.
Manaaement Actions l
{
Curing the period, two (2) contractor employees tested positive on pre-access tests at PBAPS.
Unescorted access was denied the contractor employees.
Ill.
Events Reported Under 10 CFR 26.73 There was one (1) significant FFD event reported by PBAPS during the period. The event involved the June 8,1998, discovery of a suspected illegal drug within the protected area. The substance was submitted for forensic laboratory analysis which identified the substance as marijuana.
IV.
Audits / Inspections No audit or inspections were carried out during the period.
V.
Random Testina Rate PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50% The " average number with unescorted access" includes personnel granted unescorted access at both PBAPS and Limerick Generating Station (LGS).
VI.
Additional information I
Actions Taken based uoon Unconfirmed On-site Screenina PECO Energy has elected to temporarily suspend access for individuals as permitted by 10 CFR 26.24(d).
During the previous 6-month reporting period (i.e., July - December 1997),80% of the specimens which were presumptive positive for cocaine as a result of preliminary on-site screening tests were subsequently reported as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The confirmation rate for marijuana was 90% Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 26.24(d) actions could only be taken during this reporting period on specimens which were presumptive positive for marijuana.
During the current reporting period, fourteen (14) specimens were reported as presumptive positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening at the PBAPS and LGS. Eleven (11) of those specimens screened positive and were confirmed as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. One (1) specimen which was reported as presumptive positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening was reported as adulterated. The Medical Review Officer verified the twelve (12) specimens as positive. No action was taken based upon an unconfirmed presumptive l
positive test for marijuana since all specimens were collected for pre-access testing. Ten (10) l other specimens submitted directly to the HHS-certified laboratory for special processing due to dilution, suspected adulteration or tampering, were also reported and verified as positive by the Medical Review Officer.
l r
l j
During the current reporting period, ten (10) specimens were reported as presumptive positive for cocaine as a result of on-site screening at the PBAPS and LGS. All ten (10) of those specimens screened positive and were confirmed as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer verified the ten (10) specimens as positive. No actions could be taken in accordance with 10 CFR 26.24(d) because the confirmation rate for specimens which were presumptive positive for cocaine during the previous 6-month reporting period was less than 85%.
Additionally, one (1) specimen reported as negative as a result of on-site screening and subsequently forwarded to the HHS-certified laboratory as a negative quality control in accordance with Appendix A,2.8 (b), was screened and confirmed as positive for cocaine by the HHS-certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer verified the specimen as positive.
Investigation into the processing of the specimen revealed that the on-site screening of the specimen indicated that the absorbance rate for the on-site screening was 461. The absorbance rate for the calibrator was 464. Therefore, the specimen was reported as negative. The specimen was analyzed by routine standard operating screening procedures at the HHS-certified laboratory with a result of 0.030 micrograms benzoylecgonine (cocaine)/mi urine. This value is exactly at the reporting cutoff of 300 ng/mt. Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry testing of the specimen yielded a result of 199 ng/ml, which is above the 150 ng/ml cutoff, and is therefore considered a positive result.
Reviews of all on-site testing facility and HHS-certified laboratory quality assurance / quality control samples for screening and confirmatory runs were acceptable. No evidence of any error, either random or determinate, in either the on-site screening or in the HHS-certified laboratory testing was identified.
Reduced Marijuana Cut-off Level During the period, there was one (1) confirmed positive test for marijuana at PBAPS. It is estimated that the specimen would not have tested positive using the 100 ng/ml immunoassay cut-off level.
t 1
r i
I 1
l i
l'
\\
ATTACHMENT 2 4
1 Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data January 1998 through June 1998 i
i l
I a
I
{
Fitness for Duty Program l-Performance Data l
Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 J
l l
l PECO ENERGY COMPANY JUNE 30, 1998 M ca7 6 Monr.s Endng LIMERICK GENERATING STATION Locason DAVID M. SARLEY (215) 841-5703 Con:ac: Name P%ne Onea von We)
Cuteff s: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)
O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 f 500 f
Cccaine 300 / 150 Phencyc!! dine 25 / 25
/
Opiates 300 / 300 Alechol(% EAC) 0.04 f
Testing Results Long-Term Short-Term Ucensee Employees Centracter Personnel Centractor Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access I.
22h3 1194 5
Categories Tested Poshive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 136 1
1,694 30 n
si Post accident 37
'O 50 1
0 C
g ObseNed behavior 3
0 9
2 Random 270 2
171 0
Follow-up 31 0
58 1
Other 7
0 2
0 Total 484 3
1,984 34 0
REV.1/92
!I il 1
!l I
li l
1
!il 1\\\\lIl1{
1 A
0 4
5 no i
t 4
u
't i
ts bus 3
fo ss t e nl ep 2
d m i a cs n
i e t
oa wg 1
t or sr eu d s u
lat lh s
ct se ni uT 0
3 3
I w fe o lF t lo s
h e
o c
lc 1
5 6
n A
a ts
-ye b
c n u
ni ed 0
0 0
i S
hlPc c
if i
- s c
e e e
h n pi i
p mm 0
0 0
S Afa r
o f
s e
t s
a 0
1 t
i 1
s p
e O
Te e
v n
i ia 1
t c
2 3
i o
1 1
s C
oP an d
a e
u 6
7 j
m i
1 1
1 ra r
M ifno s
s r
r C
s o
o t
e tc c
f e
o y
a a
r r
o t
tn n
l n
p o
o w
m C
C E
o m
m d
e r
r e
e e
k s
T-T-
a n
t o
r l
e e
n o
t a
c r
o h
o iL L
S T
B
\\
Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Limerick Generating Station January-June 1998 1.
Initiatives Taken The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted during the period by PECO Energy Company's drug sniffing canine teams as well as investigations and interviews used to confirm information about illicit activities at Limerick Generating Station (LGS).
- a. January 19,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
Information received indicated the contractor was involved in recent drug usage. During the interview, additional information was developed regarding recent drug use. Unescorted access was denied.
b.
March 6,1998 - An investigation was initiated based on the detection of a contractor attempting to introduce alcoholic beverages into the Protected Area. The contractor was interviewed regarding the two (2) bottles of beer that were discovered in his personal belongings. The contractor admitted that he and another contractor had brought alcohol onto plant property. The other contractor was interviewed and confirmed that the alcohol was intentionally brought on site, but was not intended to be brought into the Protected Area. A consensual search of the vehicle used by the contractors revealed an empty alcoholic beverage container. Unescorted access was terminated for both contractors, c.
March 8,1998 - An investigation was initiated based on the detection of a contractor attempting to introduce alcoholic beverages into the Protected Area. The contractor was interviewed and provided an explanation related to a can of beer being found in his personal belongings. A consensual search of the contractors vehicle revealed no other alcoholic beverage. The contractors unescorted access was continued.
d.
March 8,1998 - Contractor submitted an adulterated urine sample during pre-access processing. The contractor was requested to retum to the site for a Security interview, but failed to report. Unescorted access was denied.
e.
March 14,1998 - For-cause interview of contractor who tested positive for alcohol on pre-access screening. Cor. tractor admitted to consuming alcohol the night before with another contractor. The second contractor, who was also involved in pre-access processing, submitted to a for-cause test with negative results. Unescorted access was denied the contractor who tested positive.
f.
March 15,1998 - An investigation was initiated based upon an allegation that three (3) contractors, one (1) who was positively identified, had consumed alcohol off-site during the lunch period and then returned to the site. The allegation was determined to be credible and the identified contractor submitted to for-cause testing. The test indicated a detectable level of alcoholless than.04%BrAC. The contractor was interviewed and refused to answer questions related to his consumption of alcohol and denied knowledge of the identity of the other two (2) contractors. Through further investigation the identity of the other two (2) contractors was established. The investigation confirmed their presence, along with the first cor, tractor, in a local bar during the lunch period, that alcohol had been consumed, and that the three (3) contractors then returned to the site. The other two (2) contractors were interviewed and, in written statements, denied alcohol consumption during the lunch period and any knowledge of the first contractors alcohol consumption. All three contractors were denied unescorted access.
{
i i
I L_________
j
- g.. March 16,1998 - For-cause interview of contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interWw the contractor disclosed previous substance abuse and mental health treatment. Also disclosed were several arrests, including some drug related charges. The contractor also acknowledged current use of prescription medication. The contractor was referred for psychological evaluation. The evaluation concluded that the contractor was unsuitable at this time for unescorted access. Unescorted access was denied.
h.
March 16,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor acknowledged recent positive substance test (cocaine) at another employment and additional recent use of cocaine. Unescorted access was denied.
- i. March 16,1998 - An investigation was initiated based upon a suspected marijuana cigarette found within the Protected Area. Field testing of the suspected contraband was negative.
Forensic laboratory analysis was also conducted and reported that no controlled substances were present in the specimen.
J.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who tested positive for alcohol on pre-access screening. The contractor admitted consuming alcohol prior to the test. Unescorted access was denied.
k.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who submitted a suspicious sample for pre-access drug screening. The contractor admitted submitting a surrogate urine sample from another contractor in an attempt to elude detection of recent drug use. The contractor identified the individual who supplied him with the surrogate urine sample. Attempts to interview the supplier of the surrogate urine sample were unsuccessful as the individual did not retum to the site. Unescorted access was denied to both individuals.
l.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor admitted two recent DUI convictions and several past convictions, some of which were drug related. The contractor denied having been in any drug or alcohol treatment program. Unescorted access was denied.
- m. March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor disclosed a recent DUI conviction and completion of related alcohol treatment in February,1998. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
n.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor disclosed a July,1997 DUI conviction and recent completion of an alcohol awareness program. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
o.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor disclosed an April,1996 drug paraphemalia conviction.
Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
p.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor disclosed a March,1997 DUI charge and completion of an l
alcohol awareness program. Contractor submMed to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
J
q.
March 17,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
.During the interview, the contractor disclosed a 1986 Federal conviction for delivery of Methamphetamine. The conviction resulted in confinement for one (1) year, three (3) years special parole, and five (5) years probation. The contractor admitted to being the ' middleman' for deliveries from the laboratory. The contractor completed Federal Court supervision in 1995. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
March 17,1998 - An investigation was initiated based upon an allegation that an individual r.
l was observed driving erratically and urinating on site property. Local police were notified, the individual was located on site in his vehicle. The individual was placed in custody. The individual refused alcohol testing and was charged with DUI and related offenses. The individual was subsequently identified as a former contractor. The individuals access had been terminated Drlor to the incident.
March 18,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
s.
During the interview, the contractor admitted to two (2) previous DUI charges and an additional current pending DUI charge. Unescorted access was denied,
- t. ' March 18,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the cornractor disclosed five (5) DUI convictions between 1976 and 1991. The contractor also disclosed that he was denied access in February,1998 at another nuclear facility for failure to disclose the DUI charges. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
- u. March 19,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor admitted to a pending DUI charge. Unescorted access was denied.
v.
March 19,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor identified as supplying an adulterated urine sample for pre-access screening. The contractor admitted adulterating the sample with a commercially available product in an attempt to elude detection of recent drug use.
Unescorted access was denied,
- w. March 19,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor admitted to past arrests on alcohol and drug related charges. The contractor disclosed additional past problems with drugs and alcohol and also admitted to drug use after completing rehabilitation. Unescorted access was denied.
x.
March 20,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor admitted a recent DUI charge which is pending court action. The contractor admitted to being a recovering alcoholic and stated that the recent DUI charge was an isolated episode of drinking. Unescorted access was denied, y.
March 20,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who submitted suspicious documentation of alleged drug treatment. The contractor admitted to attempting to mislead by submitting a document from a relative purporting it to be a comprehensive drug evaluation.
Ur.' escorted access was denied.
I 1
l l
I
March 20,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
z.
.During the interview, the contractor disclosed a June 13,1994, conviction for possession of l
crack cocaine and a history of drug usage. The contractor provided documentation that he I
had successfully completed an in-patient substance abuse program. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement, aa. March 22,1998 - Random drug dog sweep of contractor work trailers. Results: Five (5 )
activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
bb. March 23,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview, the contractor disclosed an October 26,1997, DUI charge which was reduced after completion of an alcohol awareness program. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
cc. March 24,1998 - Random drug dog sweep of work control centers. Results: Four (4) activations. No drugs or forensic samples taken.
dd. March 24,1998 - For-cause interview of contractor attempting to gain unescorted access. As a result of the contractors admitted recent drug conviction. During the interview additional information was developed regarding a recent employment drug test failure and recent drug usage. Unescorted access was denied.
ee. March 24,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who submitted an adulterated urine sample for pre-access screening. The contractor admitted to adulterating the urine sample with a commercially available product in an attempt to elude detection of recent drug use.
Unescorted access was denied.
ff. March 24,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed three (3) arrests, i.e., theft (1984), assault (1989), and DUI (1996), while in the military Contractor submitted to demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
gg. March 25,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access regarding pending criminal charges related to drugs. Unescorted access was denied.
hh, March 25,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who tested positive for alcohol on pre-access screening. The contractor admitted consuming alcohol with other contractors prior to the test. Unescorted access was denied.
ii. March 25,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who tested positive for alcohol on pre-access screening. The contractor admitted consuming alcohol prior to the test. No alcohol was found during a consensual search of the contractor's personal vehicle. Unescorted access was denied.
jj. March 25,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed a November,1997 DUI conviction. The contractor also provided documentation relating to a substance abuse evaluation conducted following the incident. Contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
f kk. March 26,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
.The contractor admitted that he failed to properly disclose several arrests, four (4) of which included drug related charges. Unescorted access was denied.
11. March 26,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed that he had failed to properly disclose arrests for theft (1987), resisting arrest (1991), and assault (1992), during pre-screening on September 18,1997 at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS). Upon verification that all charges were either dropped or dismissed, the contractor sdhmitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
mm. March 26,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed that he was denied access at PBAPS in 1996 for failing to disclose two arrests, i.e., shoplifting (1984) and DUI (1995). The contractor disclosed that he is currently on parole until November,1998 for the DUI conviction. The contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
nn. March 27,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor admitted that he failed to properly disclose several arrests, three of which included drug related charges. Unescorted access was denied.
oo. March 27,1998 - For-cause interview of an applicant for employment who submitted a suspicious urine sample for pre-access / pre-employment drug screening. The applicant admitted submitting a surrogate urine sample obtained from another individual, who he identified, in an attempt to elude detection of recent drug use. Employment and unescorted access was denied.
pp. March 27,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor disclosed three (3) DUI and one (1) drug distribution conviction. Contractor disclosed current alcohol treatment. Unescorted access was denied.
qq. March 30,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor admitted to a previous positive drug test at a nuclear facility, a previous arrest for possession of cocaine, and recent drug use. Unescorted access was denied.
rr. March 30,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor who tested positive for alcohol during pre-access screening. The contractor admitted drinking alcohol the night before the test. No alcohol was found during a consensual search of the contractor's personal vehicle.
Unescorted access was denied, ss. March 30,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor admitted to failing to properly disclose a drug related conviction. Unescorted access was denied.
tt. March 30,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed three DUI arrests between 1992 and 1994.The l
contractor acknowledged a problem with alcohol and current involvement with Alcoholics Anonymous. The contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
uu. March 30,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the intentiew the contractor disclosed a March 19,1997, DUI arrest which was subsequently dismissed and other alcohol related arrests in the 1980s. The contractor acknowledged current involvement in counseling to support his abstinence from alcohol. The contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
- w. March 31,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor admitted to failing to properly disclose arrests, one of which was for the sale of cocaine. Unescorted access was denied.
1 l
ww. April 1,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
The contractor admitted to three past DUI convictions. The contractor also acknowledged another alcohol related offense for which a probationary sentence is currently being served.
l The contractor indicated that he had received alcohol related education on several occasions.
Unescorted access was_ denied.
xx. April 1,1998 - For-cause interview of an applicant for employment who had been identified as supplying a surrogate urine sample to another applicant attempting to elude detection on a pre-access / pre-employment drug screening. The individual admitted to supplying the surrogate urine sample Employment and unescorted access was denied, yy. April 1,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed a June,1997 drug related arrest involving possession of drug paraphernalia. The contractor denied any further use of illegal drugs. The l
contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
zz. April 6,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed a January 18,1998, DUI arrest. The charge was reduced to a reckless driving charge and a fine was paid. The contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
aaa. April 6,1998 - For-cause interview of a contractor attempting to gain unescorted access.
During the interview the contractor disclosed a 1983 conviction for negligent homicide resulting from an automobile accident, and a December 12,1996, positive for-cause alcohol test at another nuclear facility. The contractor provided documentation of an alcohol abuse evaluation. The evaluation was reviewed by the Fitness-for-Duty Program Manager, who recommended access be granted with specific stipulations. The contractor submitted to a demand psychological interview and was granted unescorted access with accelerated unannounced testing requirement.
bbb. M ay 15,1998 - Random drug dog sweep of work management centers, Site Services Building, and a contractor break area. Results: No activation's. No drugs or forensic samples taken.
11.
Manaaement Actions 1
During the period, thirty-four (34) contractor employees (i.e., thirty (30) pre-access, two (2) for-cause, one (1) post-accident, and one (1) follow-up) tested positive at LGS. Unescorted access was denied the thirty-four (34) contractor employees.
j During the period, three (3) PECO employees (i.e., one (1) pre-access and two (2) random) tested positive at LGS. Unescorted access was denied and the employees were referred to the Employee Assistance Program.
lit.
Events Reported Under 10 CFR 26.73 During the period there were no significant FFD events reported by telephone under 10 CFR 26.73 by LGS.
IV.
Audits / Inspections No audit or inspections were carried out during the period.
V.
Random Testina Rate PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50% The " average number with unescorted access" includes personnel granted unescorted access at both LGS and PBAPS.
VI.
Additional information Actions Taken based upon Unconfirmed On-site Screenina PECO Energy has elected to temporarily suspend access for individuals as permitted by 10 CFR 26.24(d).
During the previous 6-month reporting period (i.e., July - December 1997),80% of the specimens which were presumptive positive for cocaine as a result of preliminary on-site screening tests were subsequently reported as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The confirmation rate for marijuana was 90% Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 26.24(d) actions could only be taken during this reporting period on specimens which were presumptive positive for marijuana.
During the current reporting period, fourteen (14) specimens were reported as presumptive positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening at LGS and PBAPS. Eleven (11) of those specimens screened positive and were confirmed as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory.
One (1) specimen which was reported as presumptive positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening was reported as adulterated. The Medical Review Officer verified the twelve (12) specimens as positive. No action was taken based upon an unconfirmed presumptive positive test for marijuana since all specimens were collected for pre-access testing. Ten (10) other specimens submitted directly to the HHS-certified laboratory for special processing due to dilution, suspected adulteration or tampering, were also reported and verified as positive by the Medical Review Officer.
I
During the current reporting period, ten (10) specimens were reported as presumptive positive for cocaine as a result of on-site screening at LGS and PBAPS. All ten (10) of those specimens screened positive and were confirmed as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer verified the ten (10) specimens as positive. No actions could be taken in accordance with 10 CFR 26.24(d) because the confirmation rate for specimens which were presumptive positive for cocaine during the previous 6-month reporting period was less than 85%
~ Additionally, one (1) specimen reported as negative as a result of on-site screening and subsequently forwarded to the HHS-certified laboratory as a negative quality control in accordance with Appendix A,2.8 (b), was screened and confirmed as positive for cocaine by the HHS-certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer verified the specimen as positive.
Investigation into the processing of the specimen revealed that the on-site screening of the specimen indicated that the absorbance rate for the on-site screening was 461. The absorbance rate for the calibrator was 464. Therefore, the specimen was reported as negative. The specimen was analyzed by routine standard operating screening procedures at the HHS-certified laboratory with a result of 0.030 micrograms benzoylecgonine (cocaine)/ml urine. This value is exactly at the reporting cutoff of 300 ng/mi. Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry testing of the specimen yielded a result of 199 ng/ml, which is above the 150 ng/ml cutoff, and is therefore considered a positive result.
Reviews of all on-site testing facility and HHS-certified laboratory quality assurance / quality control samples for screening and confirmatory runs were acceptable. No evidence of any error, either random or determinate, in either the on-site screening or in the HHS-certified laboratory testing was identified.
Reduced Marijuana Cut-off Level During the period, twenty (20) specimens were confirmed positive for marijuana at LGS. It is estimated that none of the specimens would have tested positive using the 100 ng/ml immunosesay cut-offlevel.
l-l ATTACHMENT 3 Corporate and PECO Nuclear Headquarters Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data January 1998 through June 1998 l
-p
~
Fitness for Duty Program l
Performance Data
{
Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 i
i l
l I
PECO ENERGY COMPANY JUNE 30, 1998 c eca7 s Lbnr.s Ending CORPORATE AND PECO NUCLEAR HEADQUARTERS Loca:en DAVID M. SARLEY (215) 841-5703 con x.N ee Phone (inc:uce area c:x:e)
Cutoff s: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)
C Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500
/
Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25
/
Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% EAC) 0.04
/
Testing Results Long-Term
~
Short-Term Ucensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with
{-
Unescorted Access 2213 1194 Categories Tested Poshive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 11 0
1 0
.I, Post accident 3
0 0
0 0
h Obse Ned behavior 0
0 0
0 Random 52 0
5 0
Follow-up 12 0
1 0
l Other 2
0 0
0 Total l
80 0
7 0
l REV.1/92
)
i i
iiI1l l
- Iil\\;\\i A
0 5
e 4
3 2
1 tat s s e uT 0
0 0
f 4
e o l
t I
lo s
h e
o c
c 0
0 0
n lA a
ts
-ye b
c n
=
ni u
ed 0
0 0
S hE Pc c
i f
i
- s c
e e e
h n pi 0
0 0
p mm S
Ata r
o f
se s
a 0
0 0
t l
s p
e O
T e
e v
n i
i a
0 0
0 t
c i
o s
C oP an d
a e
u j
m i
0 0
0 ra r
M ifno s
s r
r C
s o
o t
e tc c
f e_
a a
o y
t t
r r
o n
n n
lp o
o w
m C
C o
E m
m d
e r
r e
e e
k s
T-T-
a n
t g
r e
e n
o la r
c o
h t
o iL L
S T
B lt{
1,
,ItI
Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Corporate and PECO Nuclear Headquarters January-June 1998 l.
Initiatives Taken No specific security actions were conducted at the Corporata or PECO Nuclear Headquarters during the period.
II.
Manaaement Actions There were no positive tests identified during the period.
Ill.
Events Reported Under 10 CFR 26.73 There were no events reported during the period.
IV.
Audits / Inspections No audit or inspections were carried out during the period.
V.
Random Testina Rate PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50%. The " average number with unescorted access" includes personnel granted unescorted access at both PBAPS and LGS.
VI.
Additional information Actions Taken based upon Unconfirmed On-site Screening Specimens collected at the Corporate and PECO Nuclear Group Headquarters are forwarded directly to the HHS-certified laboratory for testing. On-site screening is not conducted.
Reduced Marijuana Cut-off Level There were no positive tests for marijuana during the period.
l