ML20238F221
| ML20238F221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 09/11/1987 |
| From: | Brock M, Mceachern P HAMPTON, NH, SHAINES & MCEACHERN |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20238F189 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8709160032 | |
| Download: ML20238F221 (25) | |
Text
. - _ -. _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _.
- c
9 A
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the ATOMIC-SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
~In the Matter o'f
)
September 11, 1987
)
-PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF
)
Docket Nos. 50-443-OL
)
50-444-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al..
-)
'Off-site Emergenc'j
~(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
)-
Planning Issues
)
)
l-PREFILED TESTIMONY OF SERGEANT VICTOR DEMARCO AND DETECTIVE WILLIAM LALLY ON' BEHALF OF TOWN OF HAMPTON REGARDING IQH REVISED CONTENTIONS'III, IVa. V_I
.0.
Please. state your names, occupations and professional backgrounds.
A.
My name 'is Victor DeMarco.
I am 'a sergeant in the police department for the Town.of Hampton, New Hampshire.
My training has included instruction in traf fic and crowd control.
A summary of. my training record is attached. For 16 years, I have been employed by
-the Hampton Police Department. For the first 15 years I served as patrol sergeant, and was routinely involved in maintair.ing traf fic flow and keeping order among the tourist and beach population.
Presently, my duties and responsibilities concern instructing new officers-for the Town.
l l
8709160032 870911" PDR ADOCK 05000443 T
PDRe
y My: name is William Lally.
I am a detective in the police department for the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire.
My training has included instruction in traffic and crowd. control.
A summary. of my training' record is attached.
For 2 years, I was in charge.of the Department's street of ficers with primary responsibility for traffic 1
and crowd control in Hampton Beach.
Presently, I am a detective in the Hampton' Police Depar tment.
I am also President of the Hampton' Police ' Association, the union representing the full ~ time and
-seasonal, or "special", police of ficers, in the Department, with the
-exception of the Police Chief, and 2 Deputies.
.Q.
Please briefly explain the general organization and structure of the Town of Hampton Police Department.
A.
The Hampton Police Department employs 27 full-time police of ficers, excluding the Chief and 2 Deputies, 4 dispatchers, and1 5 support staff.
To be eligible f or a position as a full-time police officer with the department, an officer must successfully complete training at the State Police Academy, which includes training in all i
aspects of law enforcement.
Full-time police officers additionally must satisf actorily-complete the department's own training program, which generally includes instruction in traf fic and crowd ~ control specifically regarding these problems in Hampton Beach.
In addition to the 27 full-time police officers, the department employs approximately 50 special officers, who are hired on a seasonal basis, for approximately 12 weeks during the summer months.
Special police officers are only required to satisf actorily complete 2
L
>6 d
the department's training program.
Special of ficers are not r eq ui'r ed to complete training at the State-Police Academy.
Virtually all special of ficers have no prior law enforcement experience.
Many of these special officers may work at the Hampton Police Department for L
a month or two, and then leave to obtain f ull-time employment in police departments with other cities or towns.
The Hampton Police Department therefore has not been able to obtain, at any one time, a full complement of 60 special police officers, in view of the substantial turnover.
During the summer months, the police personnel on duty, depending on shift, may be summarized as follows:
Monday th rough Friday On/Off Duty On Duty Depending on Day 7:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m.:
2 f ull-tim e 3 detectives 9 special officers 2 prosecutors 2 dispatchers 1 Chief 4 support staff 2 Deputies 1 Training Officer 6 :0 0 p.m. to 11:0 0 p.m.: 3 full-time 10 special of ficers 2 dispatchers 2 detectives 11:0 0 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.: 3 f ull-time 7 special officers 2 dispatchers i
\\
l l
I 1
i
t l
i 1
1 Saturday 7:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m.:
2 full-time 6 special officers l
2 dispatchers i
1 detective 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.:
2 full-time 1.0 special officers 2 detectives 2:00 a.m.
to 7:00 a.m.:
6 special officers Sunday 7:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m.:
2 full-time 5 special officers 6:00 p.m.
to 11:00 p.m.:
2 full-time 5 special officers 2:00 a.m.
to 7:00 a.m.:
2 full-time 5 special officers of the 27 f ull-time police of ficers, only 1 lives in Hampton Beach.
Of the approximately 50 special police officers for the summer of 19 87, only approximately 5 lived in Hampton Beach, and 40 lived outside the Town of Hampton.
0 What is the purpose of this testimony?
A.
The purpose of this testimony is to address the Town of Hampton Contentions III, IV and VI.
Specifically, this testimony will concern whether the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency 8
Response Plan (NHRERP) provides adequate personnel, evacuation f
vehicles, and other resources to reasonably and safely evacuate the l
- town, including Hampton Beach, in the event of a radiological emergency and whether the NHRERP has properly calculated the time to complete this evacuation.
4 4
l
s
.s Our testimony is based upon our many years of experience with managing crowds and traffic in.Hampton Beach, and through^ut the Town, and upon our observation _ of traf fic patterns, problems, and
. driver behavior.
We have applied these years of observation and experience'in evaluating certain provisions of the NHRERP.
i
- 0.. Describe Hampton Beach,.its road system, and the' traffic
-normally encountered on a sunny, summer day.
A.
' The~ Town. of Hampto: is located less than two miles-from the Seabroch Lclear Power Plant.
The Town has approximately five (5) miles of coastline, most of which is comprised of the public Hampton Beach. Coastal Route 1 A, a two lane road, runs north / south, immediately adjacent to the beach.
Located directly across Route 1A f rom -the beach are numerous motels, condominiums, seasonal residences, souvenir shops, eating establishments, and other small businesses.
During the summer months, tens of thousands of residents, tourists, transients, beachgoers, and others seeking recreation crowd into Hampton Beach.
Extending West and South f rom the beach area, into the Towns of Hampton and Seabrook, lies an area of marsh or wetland where the nuclear plant is located.
The marsh essentially divides Hampton Beach from the main area of town, creating an island of beaches, summer - crowds, and traffic.
There are only a limited number of access roads from the beach, across the marsh, and into town.
In the i
event of an emergency at Seabrook, therefore, much of the evacuating
traf fic must proceed west toward, by, and beyond the power plant.
Many evacuees would be required to move closer towards a damaged reactor, the-very thing f rom - which ' they would be attempting to escape.
Additionally,.
road system' in Hampton Beach consists of the
'?
narrow one-way streets and two lane roads.
Even the principal access routes into Route 1A in the beach area, Routes 101C, 101E and 51, have only two lanes.
A single accident, breakdown, or stalled vehicle on one of the limited evacuation routes could freeze.a substantial portion of the evacuating traffic.
Vehicles within sight of the reactor would be unable to move.
In good weather, traffic is routinely bumper to bumper throughout Hampton Beach.
Typically, traffic must proceed at a slow,
. stop-and-go. pace.
Hampton-Beach is extremely congested.with pedestrians and vehicles in transit.
It is common for traffic exiting the beach to be backed up for 11/2 miles f rom the traffic light on Landing Road to Hampton Beach.
In addition to the pedestrian and vehicular traf fic, vehicles are parked throughout the area of Hampton Beach, both in formal parking spaces and curbside, in back yards, on the shoulders of roads, and otherwise anywhere that a vehicle can physically be
.placed.
During the summer months, therefore, Hampton Beach is a crowded and congested tourist resort, with pedestrians, beachgoers, moving and parked traffic.
Obviously, on sunny days the beach itself is crowded with tourists and residents.
6
)
}
}
~
i l
v.
Describe the principal? evacuation. routes f rom Hampton: Beach -
- under theLNHRERP.
l-A.
There are a limited number 'of two-lane access roads, princi-
. pally Routes 51,101C and 101E, connecting the beach with the main pa rt of Town.: Under. normal ' conditions, a vehicle in.Hampton Beach-lcan exit the' beach by. proceeding south down Route lA, across the.
~
.Hampton/Seabrook beach : bridge and into the Town of Seabrook.
Under the NHRERP, however,,this bridge will be blocked.off, thereby barring
-evacuation to the south.
(See..NHRERP Vol. 6, App. I-1).
-A' vehicle 1on'Hampton Beach may also leave the beach by
-proceedi'ng north'along Route l A, and turn lef t onto Highland Avenue or Church Street, which merge into Route 51,sheading west towards '
Town'. (See' NHRERP Vol.' 6, App. ' I-2).
At the -intersection with Route -
1 A, Church-Street is only approximately-8-10 f eet wide, bounded by walls on either-side..
A single' accident at this intersection would-block. evacuating traf fic from reaching ' Route 51, a ' principal
' evacuation' route under'the NHRERP.
Even under normal conditions, approximately 2-3 accidents occur at this intersection - each summer.
Following west on Church Street, evacuating traf fic merges 'into -
-Route 51.
Route 51, like Route 1A, is a two-lane road.
During the summer-months, beachgoers and transients typically park on the shoulders of 'both sides of Route 51, with parked vehicles extending back more than 1 mile'from the beach. 'The NHRERP relies on evacuees
.to push disabled vehicles onto the shoulders of roadways to keep the routes clear (see e.g.
NHRERP Vol.
6, pages 12-3, 12-4).
If a 7
i f
.' vehicle on Route.51 stalls out, runs out of gas, is involved in an
~
accident, or.is'otherwise disabled, however, there may be nowhere to push the vehicle to clear ~ the roadway, since the shoulders are y g already blocked with parked vehicles.
During an emergency, there is a clear. threat of increased. congestion, even gridlock, for vehicles evacuating the beach on Route'51.
Under the NHRERP,' vehicles that do not exit left onto Church
. Street, may proceed 'further north along Route lA bypassing 101E which apparently will' be blocked,' bearing west onto Route 101C or remain on lA north into the-Town of North Hampton.
Both of these roads are only two-lane-roads.
As with Route 51, these Routes are equally subject to traffic jams and gridlock.
In our experience, accidents, breakdowns,.or stalled vehicles in the Hampton Beach area roads occur on a daily basis during the summer months.
We would expect these problems to increase substantially during an evacuation, given the increased demand on the road system by all vehicles attempting to exit simultaneously.
O.
Under the NHRERP, persons evacuating from Hampton Beach are assigned to travel, along designated routes, to Manchester, New Hampshire.
Do you believe that those evacuating the beach will comply with this plan?
A.
No.
We believe it is unrealistic that those in evacuating vehicles will adhere to the evacuation Routes specified in the NHRERP.
People choose routes based on their knowledge of the roads.
Direction is not the onJy consideration; other characteristics, such 8
as congestion, the number of traffic lights and stop signs, and whether a road is f amiliar are also considered.
During an evacua-tion, people will have their own perceptions of the "best" routes out of the EPZ.
Unless their "best" rcutes happen to coincide with those specified in the NHRERP, people are likely to disregard the NHRERP routes in favor of their own.
For example, many people at Hampton Beach come f rom the south, including the Boston area.
The NHRERP would require these indivi-duals to proceed west, bypassing Interstate 95, and on towards l
Manchester. We believe, however, that a substantial majority of these l
l vehicles would ignore the route to Manchester, in favor of proceeding l
south on Interstate 95, heading towards their own homes, f amilies and l
l friends.
We would also point out that the NHRERP evacuation time estimates are based upon the unrealistic assumption that evacuees will fully comply with the evacuation routes specified in the NHRERP.
Since we do not believe this is likely to occur, we would anticipate a significant increase in the evacuation time estimates specified in the NHRERP.
Additionally, as police officers, we commonly observe that whenever traffic is congested, some motorists will disregard established traf fic patterns in an a t te mpt to avoid the congestion.
A common example of this occurs whenever traf fic is congested on Route 51 or Interstate 95.
Then, many motorists drive along the 9
l
l shoulders in an ef f ort to avoid delays.
This occurs even though it is unlawful to drive along the shoulders and despite the f act that motorists know that police of ficers routinely patrol and actively enforce infractions of this nature along these routes.
It is also common for motorists to avoid pre-established routes
'in order to " find their own way".
Examples include shortcutting through residential areas and shopping centers to avoid congested intersections.
Suffice it to say that whenever motorists perceive an advantage in taking a "dif f erent" route, they are likely to use it.
Thus, it is unrealistic to assume that evacuees will adhere to the evacuation routes prescribed in the NHRERP.
Q.
Doesn't the NHRERP establish mechanisms for controlling traffic and ensuring the evacuees adhere to prescribed evacuation routes?
A.
The NHRERP calls f or the Town of Hampton and state police to control traf fic in an attempt to "f acilitate" evacuees to adhere to prescribed routes, by using such techniques as blocked lanes, barricades, and cones.
In our opinion, these measures will still not enable state and local of ficials to " discourage" significant numbers of evacuees from deviating from the prescribed evacuation routes, who will seek alternative, familiar routes, leading home.
Nor will they prove successf ul in controlling traf fic and preventing congestion.
For example, under the NHRERP, access control points (ACPs) on the perimeter of the EPZ, and traf fic control points (TCPs) located 1
throughout the EPZ will be staffed by personnel, including the state 10 i
police and police from the Town of Hampton.
Even assuming the Town of Hampton were to participate fully in staffing an evacuation, typically only 15 available police officers are on duty during a single shif t during the summer months. Under the NHRERP, however, approximately 30 traffic control guides are needed to staff the TCPs within the Town of Hampton.
This does not include the additional staffing, even using the State's own estimates, required for i
Hampton's municipal security (6), EOC security (2), or EOC staf fing (4).
(See summary of Personnel Resource Assessment f or the NHRERP, August 19 87, Hampton Table 2.2-4).
Many eff-duty Hampton Police officers would have to be located, notified, and be able to maneuver through thousands of outgoing evacuation vehicles to reach Hampton Beach or otherwise staff the TCPs.
At at minimum, there would be substantial delay in acquiring this necessary staffing.
These delays are not accounted for in the evacuation time estimates in the NBRERP, which assumes, unrealistically, that all ACPs and TCPs would be fully staffed immediately upon notification of an emergency.
(See NHRERP Vol. 6,
- p. 10-7 0).
Additionally, although the State has indicated it will i
compensate with as many as twenty-eight state police to act as TCPs for Hampton, Troop A in Epping, with approximately thirty-five officers, is the only state police barracks in reasonable proximity to the EPZ.
Virtually all of these State Police Of ficers would be required to staf f the ACPs, with none lef t to compensate
- lr the lack 11
__--_--___________..-_N
.c of adequate local. staf fing fcr TCPs, both within Hampton, and the other sixteen: New Hampshire EPZ communities.
(See NHRERP Vol. 4B, Troop A Emergency. Response Procedures, Vol.
6, App. L).
The New Hampshire Civil Defense Director himself has stated that it will take an additional three to four hours before state police, beyond those available in Troop A, could be deployed in an emergency.
For all of these reasons, we do not believe that there will be adequate personnel to promptly implement the NHRERP, and that the evacuation time estimates contained in that plan are unreasonably low.
O.
Do you believe that the Department's 50 special of ficers would provide the additional personnel necessary to carry out the.
.NHRERP?
A.
No. As we testified, special officers have no police academy
' training, and therefore lack in depth instruction in traffic.and
. crowd control.. These special officers also lack expetience.
In 19 87, approximately 20% of the Department's special of ficers were new,' and another 50% in their second season.
Theref ore, 70% of the
'Depa r tm en t's special officers had less than 25 weeks of law enforcement experience.
Without direct supervision by full-time, experienced of ficers, it is not reasonable to expect these special officers, with limited experience, to maintain traffic flow of thousands of vehicles.
These officers would not be able to direct at least a reasonable percentage of evacuating vehicles along the routes prescribed in the NHRERP, when drivers may pref er alternative routes that lead more directly 12 L
1
liome or out of the EPZ.
During an emergency, however, the full-time-officers even if.available,. would be spread throughout the Town, and
- would be. unable to. meaningfully supervise the special of ficers. -
Even.if adequately trained, or if supervision were available, most special of ficere, 'for a given shif t, would be of f duty and not readily available for an emergency.
As we testified, in 19 87, 80% of the special of ficers did' not even live within Hampton and may have a tempora ry residence for the. summer.
Many of these' off duty-officers may be reached by phone, if at all, through friends.
Finally, even if contacted, the special officers could not maneuver through evacuating vehicles to reach many TCPs or other areas of need.
Even under normal conditions, during the summer months, it is common to take 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for an of ficer to travel f rom the western part of Town to Hampton Beach.
During an emergency, evacuation traf fic would likely prevent those of ficers travelling f rom out of town or the western part of Hampton f rom reaching the beach, the most critical area of need.
As we testified, this could j
eliminate up to 80% of the special officers.
O.
In your opinion, what other consequences would result f rom a lack of available personnel to immediately staff the TCPs in Hampton?
A.
In addition to a substantial increase in evacuation time, the likelihood of substantially increased traffic congestion, delays, accidents, blocked roads, and similar problems would be enhanced, if there were inadequate traf fic control guides to direct and route evacuation traffic.
l 13 L
1 J
o a
X 4
s i
6
'l
- Fo r. example, ' t raf fic control Post #D-HA-0 5, in Hampton,.at the.
. intersection'of Route 51, and Route 1 requires management by five ithout' a complete
- traf fic guides '(see' Volume 6 NHRERP, Appendix ll'.-
mor$ l'ikely that many-I complement of. traffic. guides, iti is even
\\
individuals, for-example, proceeding west.along Route 51 would elect to, enter'ontoLRoute l' South rather than proceed west as directed
' under the NHRERP.
A similar problem involves traf fic' control post # D-HA-02,.in Hampton, at the intersection of Routes 101C, 51, andfl95,'which
, appears to discourage vehicles proceeding south on.I95.
From our years of experience With traf fic control, however, we believe many
' drivers, including many Massachusetts residents, would insist on proceeding south-on I95.
These problems would'likely occur at inadequately staffed, or unstaffed, TCPs throughout'the Town.
O.
If all access contro1 ~ points and traffic control points were immediately staf fed as called for.in the NHRERP, do you believe that I
the drivers would evacuate along the routes prescribed under the NHRERP?
A '.
No.
In our experience," driver behavior is shaped by percep-tions of the traf fic directions being given.
When such directions are contrary to intended goals and, f rom a driver's perspective, are ill-advised, drivers may deliberately disobey whatever directions are given.
As we testified earlier, certain of the evacuation routes l
prescribed under the NHRERP will be perceived as contrary to the i
l' 14
l
)
I interests'of evacuees, and they will respond accordingly.
At best,
]
evacuees will argue with or attempt to persuade traffic guides that a mandated traf fic route is not the best way out of the EPZ.
This will cause traffic delays and congestion as traffic backs up behind upset I
drivers.
Without question, a substantial number cf evacuees will simply ignore the directions given by the traffic guides and travel along routes that they believe provide a more direct way out of the EPZ.
O.
Based upon the concerns you have expressed regarding the NHRERP, what conclusions have you made with respect to that traf fic control plan?
A.
In our opinion, the NHRERP traf fic control plan is inherently flawed.
It is a paper exercise and would not work.
Even assuming the NHRERP will prescribe the optimal evacuation routes for a particular evacuation, a substantial number of drivers likely would not agree.
In our experience, many drivers would deviate from the prescribed routes, which will cause additional delay presently not accounted f or in the evacuation time estimates under the NHRERP.
The NHRERP unrealistically assumes that all access control points and traffic control points will be immediately and fully staf f ed to implement that plan.
(See NHRERP Vol. 6 p.10-7 0).
This assumption is not realistic.
As we testified, even assuming a full l
complement of Hampton's of f-duty police of ficers could be notified, l.
f 15 l
f
many of these officers would encount'er substantial delay in attempting to reach the various traf fic control posts.
For example, officers. attempting to proceed down Route 51 towards Hampton Beach would be conf ronted with literally thousands of westbound vehicles.
-Even if an officer can reach Route 1A, even under normal conditions, it is of ten not. f easible to proceed in a police cruiser,. even with lights flashing, f rom one end of Hampton Beach to the other, due to traffic congestion.
For this reason, the Town of Hampton. has purchased several motorcycles, which have provided a reasonably reliable method to maneuver through the bumper-to-bumper traf fic.
None of these common and practical dif ficulties with reaching and staffing TCPs and ACPs is reasonably accounted for in the NHRERP.
The NHRERP also unreasonably assumes that evacuation vehicles, includin,g buses, will be able to enter the EPZ at between 40 and 50 miles per hour.
(See NHRERP Vol. 6 p. 11-20).
We believe these speeds are grossly overestimated, and are not realistic even under non-emergency conditions.
As we testified, tourists typically park on the shoulders on either side of Route 51 f rom the beach extending west along 51 f or more than 1 mile.
A single breakdown or stalled vehicle in this area would require other vehicles to proceed around and into the eastbound lane in an attempt to maneuver around the disabled vehicle.
We therefore see a high likelihood of high speed accidents between incoming emergency vehicles and the thousands of outgoing evacuating vehicles.
Similarly, other principal evacuation routes out of Hampton Beach, including Routes 1A and 101C, are only 16
.h two lane roads, of ten without adequate shoulders ' for drivers. to push
- aside disabled vehicles blocking the traffic flow.
We therefore n
believe,: and it has been our common experience, that such disabled.
Vehicles will-routinely.cause substantial delays, backups, even gridlock.
We would expect these conditions..t'o be magnified under emergency conditions.
The NHRERP assumption that all roads will remain " passable" C, ring an evacuation is not even accurate under normal traffic conditions. ~(See NHRERP Vo. 6 p.10-7 0).
O.
In-your opinion, are traffic accidents and automobile 1
l' breakdowns likely to occur _dur'ing an evacuation?
A.
Definitely.
The Town of Hampton has approximately.14 miles of roadway. In 19 86, the Town of Hampton Police Department responded to hundreds of accidents, breakdowns.and stalled vehicles within the Town.
Accidents and. breakdowns occur every day, and during the emergency atmosphere of an evacuation, the number and severity of these incidents would likely increase dramatically.
Of course,. it would not take. a major accident or breakdown to cause heavy conges-j.
tion and traf fic backups.
Following an accident, some drivers would
- be unable to move their vehicles f rom the traf fic lane, blacking traffic behind them.
This would cause other drivers to change lanes, blocking incoming traffic, and increase the chances of other r
l 17
)
i 1
- _. _ _ _ _. = _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _
accidents, including those involving inbound emergency vehicles.
Of
)
course, some accidente might result in injuries to drivers or passen-gers that are severe enough that continuing out of the EPZ would be impossible.
Other f actors would also slow traffic.
Even without accidents, breakdowns will occur.
For example, cars will run out of gas and will likely be abandoned.
In the heat of the summer, slow moving traf fic results in some vehicles overheating and stalling in traffic lanes.
Fog and heavy rain reduce traffic flow and can cause congestion.
l Winter storms, particularly snow or i'c e storms, also result in reducing traffic flow, causing congestion, as slow moving traf fic loses friction with road surfaces.
O.
Would the absence of shoulders on evacuation routes increase traffic congestion and delay traffic flow?
A.
Yes.
Most of the principal evacuation routes out of Hampton Beach, Routes 1A, 51, 101E and 101C have inadequate shoulders, or have shoulders which are routinely occupied by parked vehicles.
Most shoulders are not paved, and in reality, the " shoulders" along these routes are just strips of sand.
In certain areas, vehicles i
proceeding onto these shoulders could sink into the sand.
Thus many vehicle breakdowns or accidents would block a substantial part of the
- roadway, severely limiting traffic flow.
Along these
- roads, emergency vehicles would be severly hampered or even precluded f rom quickly responding to traffic accidents and other emergencies, since I
there would be no route of access not blocked by evacuating traf fic.
{
I l
18 l
L_________
'l Y
y j.'
r 1
1 O.
As a result 'of the problems and deficiencies that you have
- expressed regarding the traf fic control plan - for the NHRERP,. has the
. Town'of Hampton Police Department taken any' formal position.with-I
' respect'to this plan?.
- A.
-Yes..
On July 1, 1987, the Hampton Police Association voted unanimously that the NHRERP -is " totally unrealistic, ' unworkable, and-uns uppo'r tabl e".
This statement fairly summarizes the position of. all
.Hampton Police union' members regarding the NHRERF.
- 0.. Does.this. conclude your testimony?.
A.
Yes.
l Respectfully submitted, TOWN OF HAMPTON By Its - Attorneys SHAINES &
EACHERN Professi 1 As ciation By:-
aul McEachern N
I
-t Dated:
September
,-1987 B :
Matthew T. Brock l
1 l
l 19 t'
e
- page goes i
3AMPTON POLICE DEPARTMENT i
1AMPTON,'NEW HAMPSHIRE OFFICER:
De Marco. Victor R.
RANK:
Seroeant I
i INDIVIDUAL TRAINING RECORD:
DATE COURSE TITLE AGENCY l
J State Police 11/8/73 Sh Week Basic P.O. School i
'5/7178 Report Writing
- Trooper Davy Attorney Junkins S/10/78 Const. Law & Town Ordin.
_ /16/18 Prob. cause & Juv. Arrest Attorney Eldridge S
S/23/78 Communication Patrolman Cross i
S/2S178 Rules & Regulations Chief Picacci 6/6/78 Court & Ct. Prep.
Attorney Graper 6/8/78 Commun. Relat.
Dr. Call 6/13/78 Stress on P.O.
Dr. Seemans j
y/u//s 11/8/78 Patrolman & Part-time Juv. Of ficer's School State Police en- -
2/iA/79 Police Civil Liabilita Attorney Frasier
- S/3/79 Fingerprint 2 Trooper Shechey S/10/79 Fire Medic Role Chief Stickney S/1S/79 Coffect 6 Pres. of Evidence Captain Beaudoin S/24/79 Communitti Relations Chief Cronin F.F. Mackle S/29/79 First Aid CPR 6/1/79 Part-time Officer's School State Police 5lZ6/80
~
5/29/80 Officer's Survival School State Police j
)
FBI Special Agent Roaer Corke 6/6/80 civil liabilita 6/9/80 -
S&W Academy 6/13180 Firearm's Instructor School
$$hh0hhb~
Deadly Force / Officer Reaction S&W Academet
$bb1 S&W Armor's School SSW Academy
- Page 2***
.HAMPTON POLICE DEPARTMENT OE b"4CO' YdC#04 R' h1AMPTON,NEWHAMPSHIRE OFFICER:
RANK:
Seraeant i
i INDIVIDUAL TRAINING RECORD:
~
AGENCY DATE COURSE TITLE JV)s))6)~
10/14/81 Stress Manaaement State Police 2/2/82 Civil Liabilittj Seminar St. ate Police 9/82 S&W Advanced Armor's School State Police
~
State Police 9/27/82 F.B.I. Firearm's Inst. Course 12'/N / b t.
~
State Police Ii 82 Defensive Driving Course 12/10/82 Refresher Course: S&W Armor's School State Police
,9/6/84 Developing 6 Using Delegating Stzills State Police 11/26/84 -
- pgg igg S&W Chemical Agent School State Police 10/23/85 Three Year Firearm's inst. Cert.
State Police hbhhbhk Crowd ContAol & Chemical Aaents Souad leader St. ate Police ammmmmmmm=-
12/15186 NH Law Update State Police I
I i
w e
l
.' HAMPTON POLICE DEPARTMENT HAMPTON, NEW HAMP5 HIRE OFFICER.
Lally, William G.
RANK:
Detective INDIVIDUAL TRAINING RECORD:
DATE COURSE TITLE AGENCY 2/27/81 Full-Time Police Officer PSTC 2/81 PR-24 Certification PSTC 3/29/82 -
4/2/82
' Officer Survival School PSTC 4/2/82 Registered NRA Police Firearms Training Course NRA 11/8-10/82 Police Officer Stress PSTC
~11/29/82 -
12/5/82 Advanced Delensive Drivino PRTC 6/83 Sttess Management for Police PSTC S/23/84 Danaenous Motokean fo Gann s U.S: Marshat's Sonviep 9/4/84 Draf ting Af fidavits/ Warrants for Field Personnel PSTC 9/24-28/84 Sex Crime Investigation PSTC 10/25/84 NECA Narcotics N.E.0.A.
1/14-25/85 Drug Enforcement School PSTC 10/85 NECA Narce (cs N.E.0.A.
- y/70lg5 Composite identi-Kit School Identi-Kit Co., Inc.
S/86 NENE0A NarcotLes (Crack)
NE0A 8/86 Homicide School 9/86 Hostage Negotiations 12/18/86 Drug Enforcement Update 3chool PSTC 1/12-18/86 Police instructor School PSTC 4/2/87 DEA Task Force Conference DEA
]
r
.1
e
. b CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Matthew T.
Brock, one of the att Teys for the Town of Hampton
-herein, hereby certify that on September 1,
1987, I made service of the following document PREFILED TESTIMONY )F SERGEANT VICTOR DEMARCO AND DETECTIVE WILLIAM LALLY ON BEHALF OF 'OWN OF HAMPTON REGARDING TOH REVISED CONTENTIONS III, IV AND VI by depositing copies thereof in the United States Mail first class postage prepaid for delivery (or, where indicated,'by Express Mail, prepaid) addressed to:
- Helen Hoyt, Esq., Chairman
- Judge Gustave A. Linenberger, J c.
Atomic Safety and Li' censing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel East West Towers Building U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
4350 East West Highway East West Towers Building Bethesda, MD 20814 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814
- Dr. Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Panel Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
East West Towers Building Washington, DC 20555 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel
- Docketing and Service U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Mrs. Anne E.
Goodman William S. Lord, Selectman Board of Selectmen Town Hall 13-15 Newmarket Road Friend Street Durham, NH 03842 Amesbury, MA 01913 Jane Doughty Rep. Robarta C. Pevear Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Drinkwater Road j
5 Market Street Hampton Falls, NH 03844 I
Portsmouth, NH 03801
- Philip Ahrens, Esq.
- Thomas G. Dignan, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General George H.
Lewald, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General Kathryn A.
Selleck, Esq.
j State House Ropes & Gray j
Station 6 225 Franklin Street I
Augusta, ME 04333 Boston, MA 02110 j
l Robert A.
Backus, Esq.
- Sherwin E.
Turk, Esq.
Backus, Meyer & Solomon Office of the Exec. Legal Dir.
111 Lowell Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
I Manchester, NH 03105 Tenth Floor l
7735 Old Georgetown Road j
l Bethesda, MD 20814 l
1 2$ MAPLEWOOD AVENUE - P O. Hox 360. PORTSMOUTH. N H 0380s l
i i
d
- o Y
Mr. Angie.Machiros, Chairman H. Joseph Flynn, Esq.
l
- Board of Selectmen Office of General Counsel j
Newbury, MA 01950 Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency j
500 C Street, S.W.
- George Dana Bisbee, Es q.
Washington, DC 20472 Stephen:E. Merrill, Fcq.
Office of the Attorney General
- Carol S. Sneider, Esq.
State House Annex Donald S. Bronstein, Esq.
Concord, NH 03301 Allan R. Fierce, Esq.
Dept. of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place
{
Stanley W.
Knowles 19th Floor Board of Selectmen Boston, MA 02108
. P.O. Box 710
{
North Hampton, NH 03862 J.
P. Nadeau, Selectman Richard E.
Sullivan i
Selectmen's Office Mayor 10 Central Road City Hall Rye, NH 03870 Newburyport, MA 01950
/
Alfred V. Sargent, Chairman Senator Gordon J. Humphrey
]
Board of Selectmen U.S. Senate Town of Salisbury Washington, DC 20510 Salisbury, MA 01950 (Attn:
Tom Burack) 1 Michael Santosuosso, Chairman Allen Lampert Board of Selectmen Civil Defense Director-Jewell St., RFD 2 Town of Brentwood So. Hampton, NH 03827 Exeter, NH 03833 Richard A.
Hampe, Esq.
Gary W.
Holmes, Esq.
. Hampe and McNicholas Holmes and Ellis
' 35 Pleasant Street 47 Winnacunnet Road Concord, NH 03301 Hampton, NH 03842 William Armstrong Calvin A. Canney, City Manager
{
Civil Defense Director City Hall 10 Front Street 126 Daniel Street.
Exeter, NH 03833 Portsmouth, NH 03801
- Edward A.
Thomas Sandra Gavutis Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency Town of Kensington 442 J.W. McCormack (POCH)
RFD 1, Box 1154 Boston, MA 02109 East Kensington, NH 03827
. Charles P.
Graham, Esq.
- Diane Curran, Esq.
)
McKay, Murphy & GrabNa Andrea C. Ferster, Esq.
{
100 Main Street Harmon & Weiss j
Amesbury, MA 01913 Suite 430 j
2001 S Str at, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009-1125 2
)
1 5HAINES & McEACHERN
- PROFES$10NAL ASSOCIATION 25 MAPLEWOOD AVENUE. P O Box B60 PORT 6 MOUTH, N.M 03801 i
l
g.
.o.
Robert Carrigg, Chairman Senator Gordon J.
Humphrey
-Board of Selectmen One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Town Office
. Concord, NH 03301 Atlantic Avenue (Attn:
Herb Boynton)
J North Hampton, NH 03862
{
l Mr. Thomas H.
Powers, III Mr. Peter Matthews j
Town Manager Mayor Town of Exeter City Hall 10 Front Street Newburyport, MA 01950 j
l Exeter, NH 03833
)
Brentwood Board of Selectmen Judith H. Mizner, Esq.
RFD Dalton Road Silvergate, Gertner, Baker, Brentwood, NH 03833 Fine, Good & Mizner 88 Broad Street Boston, MA 02110 N
\\
Qh,k Matthew T.
Brock
- UPS NEXT. DAY AIR l
lj.
}
}
I I-3 SHAfNES & McEACHERN PatOFE5580NAL ASSOCIATION I
26 MApLEWOOD AVENUE p O Box 360 postTSMOUTH. N H 03fl01 I
l
__ _ a