ML20238F112
| ML20238F112 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1987 |
| From: | White S TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8709150386 | |
| Download: ML20238F112 (2) | |
Text
m
- i jj TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY-CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37401.
6N 38A Lookout Place-August 24, 1987 WS 16 h.I.1'?
@S $$ f 32$
l
/
Mr. -James Keppler,: Director
(:
Office of Special Projects
~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West Highway-EWH 322-Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Dear Mr. Keppler:
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 8.-1987 MEETING HITH THE TENNESSEE
?
VALLEY. AUTHORITY.
During my review of.the subject 1 transcript,;I noticed some significant omissions of my words during the discussion of the scope'of the independent verification ~ program. 'For the record, enclosed is a marked-up page 28 of the-transcript which more clearly states what was said at the July 8,-1987 meeting.
Very truly yours.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY A
fi Manager of Nuclear Power j
Enclosure l
I i
L-G709150386 070824 M
{DR ADOCK 05000327 PDR J
1 An Equal Opportunity Employer
-Q
t[.:
28 6
4 1-So, we are'not going out of our way to ~ avoid
((
2L things which.have been overviewed by TVA, particularly..
3-MR. WHITE:' I don't know how that fits in with k)OurcgK l e t te r, Mr. Keppler, now.
4 5
MR. KEPPLER:
I wouldn't accept the remarks 6
that was just made exactly, because I think it is not our
- 7 intent to dwell on areas that you have spent time on.
8 MR. EBNETER:
.You have done calculations in-9 civil areas.
' The team will have to review that 10 calculation to the extent to verify the validity of it
~
11 and the assumptions used in making that and the accuracy-12 of the final calculation.
They may not have to redo the 13 calc, but they have to lock at the calc and verify 'it.
14 MR. WHITE:
I just want to make sure that --
from your letter 15 can I make a try at this to sayAthat the verification 16
. effort is going to focus on areas not directly covered by 17 our other eff orts and should minimize redoing work 18 already perf ormed by TVA.
your 19 I think that was that intent, and I just want 20 to make sure that hasn't changed from what you said.
21
M R. EBNETER:
We will have to do what we i
j 22 have to do to verify the design.
Those comments were f or 23 your benefit to minimize the impact on your staff.
It's i
24 nothing to do with my staff.
They will do whatever they 25 have to do to do the verification.
It will involve eM1Te Re,oR m e,eenc u e1s e m a n a c s. 77a
. -,