ML20238D056
| ML20238D056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1987 |
| From: | Levin H, Mortgat C TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-#188-5241 OL, NUDOCS 8801040077 | |
| Download: ML20238D056 (73) | |
Text
5241 DOCKETED I
Filed:
December 2$3Mf987
- S7 00: 28 P1 :35 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,vFFlcE c; gg,, g,
l OCHE7 before the n t ;g7.
j ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-445-OL
)
50-446-OL TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING
)
COMPANY et al.
)
)
(Application for an (Comanche Peak Steam Electric
)
Operating License)
Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
ANSWERS TO BOARD'S 14 QUESTIONS (Memo; Proposed Memo of April 14, 1986)
Recardina Action Plan Results Report I.c In accordance with the Board's Memorandum; Proposed Memo-randum and Order of April 14, 1986, the Applicants submit the answers of the Comanche Peak Response Team ("CPRT") to the 14 questions posed by the Board, with respect to the Results Report published by the CPRT in respect of CPRT Action Plan I.c,
" Electrical Conduit Supports."
Openina Recuest:
Produce copies of any CPRT-generated checklists that were used during the conduct of the action plan.
Response
The only CPRT-generated checklist used in implementation of this Action Plan is provided in Attachment 1, " Train
'C' Conduit Support Calculations Review Checklist (Revision 0)."
This was a 8801040077 87122B
{DR ADOCK05000g5
'SCO
c limited-purpose checklist used just twice in the third-party review of Train C conduit support calculations related to proce-4 dure development.
Use of checklists was discontinued, and sub-
]
sequent revie'ws were documented by Technical Memoranda prepared in accordance with Civil / Structural / Mechanical Work Instructions.
Implementation review checklists were also prepared for overview of the implementation of the Train C program.
These are not included in this response, as they were not used to support the conclusions reached in the Results Report.
The responsibility for implementation overview has been transferred to the TU Electric QA Technical Audit Program.
Question No. 1:
1.
Describe the problem areas addressed in the report.
Prior to undertaking to address those areas through sampling, what did Applicants do to define the problem areas further?
How did it believe the problems arose?
What did'it dis-cover about the QA/QC documentation for those areas?
How extensive did it believe the problems were?
Response
The problem area addressed in this ISAP was to verify that Train C (non-safety-related) supports and anchorages for conduit 2 inches or less in diameter will maintain their structural integ'rity during a safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) or, assuming that failure occurs, (1) verify that they will not adversely affect the function of safety-related components or cause injury to occupants of the control room or (2) specify installation of passive seismic restraints to prevent collapse in the event of - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -
i support failure so as to preclude unacceptable interactions with safety-related components.
Unit 1 Train C conduit greater than 2 inches in diameter is within_the scope of the Systems Interaction Program (previ-ously referred to as the Damage Study Program) and ISAP II.d, I
and Unit 2 Train C conduit greater than 2 inches in diameter was designed to the same criteria as Trains A and B.
Sample analyses were performed by the Project in the initial phase of the investigation.
Utilizing the selected analytical approach, the seismic capability of about 1.8% of the supports in the sample could not be confirmed.
Although demon-strating seismic adequacy with a more refined analytica?
approach and/or testing might have been possible, the Preject elected to demonstrate seismic adequacy through a 100% seismic interaction review / qualification program, which was developed by Impell and evaluated by the third party.
This program consisted of a multi-level screening process, the details of which are presented in the ISAP I.c Results Report.
The issue arose because in the original design evaluation the assumption was made that conduit 2 inches or less in diame-ter was inherently capable of withstanding seismic loads such that adverse interactions with safety-related items would not occur.
The NRC TRT was unable to find documented justification for this assumption.
The lack of documentation justifying seismic adequacy of conduit supports was known to apply to all Train C conduit 2 inches and less in diameter.
The third party did not review QA/QC documentation as part of this Action Plan.
Question No. 2:
2.
Provide any procedures or other internal documents that are necessary to understand how the checklists should be inter-preted or applied.
Response
The checklist form used for ISAP I.c was developed follow-ing the guidance provided in Design Adequacy Program (DAP) procedures.
The following DAP procedures (Attachments 2 and 3) served as guidance for its development and use:
DAP-4, Preparation of Checklists DAP-5, Review of Calculations, Evaluations and Other Implementing Documents Ouestion No. 3:
3.
Explain any deviation of checklists from the inspection report documents initially used in inspecting the same attributes.
Resoonse:
The checklist used in this ISAP contained design-related attributes and so is not comparable to QC inspection report documents, which are related to physical inspection attributes.
To our knowledge, no previous design-related documents exist that would provide a meaningful comparison to the checklist used.
Question No. 4:
4.
Explain'the extent to which the checklists contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes to which Applicants are committed to conform.
4 J
d a
Response
The checklist contained the attributes necessary to confirm compliance with the codes and standards applicable to the specific calculations being reviewed.
l Ouestion No. 5:
j S.
(Answer Question 5 oniv if the answer to Question 4 is that the checklists do contain fewer attributes.)
Explain the engineering basis, if any, for believing that the safety margin for components (and the plant) has not been degraded by using checklists that contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes.
Response
This question is not applicable by reason of the response to question 4.
Question No. 6:
6.
Set forth any changes in checklists while they were in use, including the dates of the changes.
Response
No changes were made to the checklist while it was in use.
Question No. 7:
7.
Set forth the duration of training in the use of checklists and a summary of the content of that training, including field training or other practical training.
If the train-ing has changed or retraining occurred, explain the reason for the changes or retraining and set forth changes in duration or content.
Response
The checklist was developed following the guidance of DAP l
procedures and was used by experienced engineers who worked under the direction of the Issue Coordinator.
These individuals were trained in use of the checklist through discussions with the Issue Coordinator and assignments to read the DAP procedures f __
listed in the response to question 2.
No retraining or changes to the training program occurred during implementation of this ISAP.
Ouestion No. 8:
8.
Provide any information in Applicants' possession concern-ing the accuracy of use of the checklists (or the inter-observer reliability in using the checklists).
Were there any time periods in which checklists were used with questionable training or QA/QC supervision?
If applicable, are problems of inter-observer reliability addressed statistically?
Response
The two applications of the checklist were performed and checked by experienced and qualified engineers and are therefore believed to be accurate.
No time periods of questionable train-ing or supervision were involved.
Inter-observer reliability is not applicable to this action plan.
Question No. 9:
9.
Summarize all audits or supervisory reviews (including reviews by employees or consultants) of training or of use of the checklists.
Provide the factual basis for believing that the audit and review activity was adequate and that each concern of the audit and review teams has been resolved in a way that is consistent with the validity of conclusions.
Response
No audits were performed regarding the two applications of the checklist.
Question No. 10:
10.
Report any instances in which draft reports were modified in an important substantive way as the result of management action.
Be sure to explain any change that was objected to (including by an employee, supervisor, or consultant) in writing or in a meeting in which at least one supervisory or management official or NRC employee was present.
-S-
I:
Explain what the earlier drafts said and why they were modified.
Explain how dissenting views were resolved.
Response:-
No substantive modifications were made to the Results Report as a result of management action.
Question No. 11:
1 11.
Set forth any unexpected difficulties that were encountered in completing the work of each task force and that would be helpful to the Board in understanding the process by which conclusions were reached.
How were each of these un-expected difficulties resolved?
Response
As previously mentioned, early in the sample analyses of conduit runs, determination was made to resolve the ISAP concerns through a 100% seismic interaction review / qualification program rather than a sampling-based rpogram.
Question No. 12:
12.
Explain any ambiguities or open items in the Results Report.
Response
To the best of our knowledge, no ambiguities or open items exist in the Results Report.
Implementation of the seismic interaction review / qualification program for Train C conduit by Impell Corporation is ongoing, with overview by the TU Electric QA Technical Audit Program.
Question No. 13:
13.
Explain the extent to which there are actual or apparent conflicts of interest, including whether a worker or super-visor was reviewing or evaluating his own work or supervis-ing any aspect of the review or evaluation of his own work or the work of those be previously supervised.
1 1 i
l l
l 1
1
i l
Response
No known actual or apparent conflicts of interest were associated with implementation of this Action Plan.
Neither Impell Corporation nor third-party personnel were associated with the original design work.
Question No. 14:
14.
Examine the report to see that it adequately discloses the thinking and analysis used.
If the language is ambiguous or the discussion gives rise to obvious questions, resolve the ambiguities an* anticipate and resolve the questions.
ResDonse:
The Issue Coordinator and others who aided in the prepara-tion and approval of the Results Report have reviewed and I
checked the report for clarity and believe that no ambiguities exist.
Respectfully submitted,
\\
vJV
\\
CY F. civ a gan i
Action Plan I.c Issue Coordinator
/
d
->/1 i
~
HT T.' Levin
'V j
Review Team Leader
)
The CPRT Senior Review Team has reviewed the foregoing responses and concurs in them.
- I l 1
CN Ts
'E E
n.
E T T T YC E
A A A RT D D D O
- M 4
TA CT A
M FO SN
- C I
TS
- A
)
AE 0
SY
-. T T'
V N
E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP I
AA I
C LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
sr e
e e
e y
eo l.
r r
r s r
N l
ip at u
u u i u
O nr tp ur d
d d
d "c. I ia dru t o e
e e i e
T e
ees cp t
c c s c n c
1A R L
dl; mp ap lr n
o n o ie o ie o L E R A ecd roe u slo i
r i r
h r rh r Po W E V s
e orh es eap p
p lt p et p
Ao E K O uec f pt h
t p
se s e -
a t.
SL I
C R E
rn r '
te aru ih-n ih n ih n ah n E P T
sae etf h
IA V l
P U
r r pco st cos.
teg teg rteg mteg C E if l hi l
hi eihi ihi l
R C A B
ene e
e
.d ds ahts ahts twts twts tof srs sf nret it e i t
e a e
l e
T I
R R
ei e i rn uo i ei r rifd rifd m ef d oefd O
T mtr oo bla ewo e wo co bco P
T aa nci nt nmpp t e
t e tn e n e rl r o s oh oup aest a est last nast P
A U
auo i en ig i nut mcna m cna odna odna S
pc the.
ti t
sn noi noi b r oi i r oi ld atms ae ag e t ai r gai r oi r t oi r T
nae l
ir lw l orn rdsp ndsp rcsp ccsp gcn u gd e u-ul oo o ri o i ri o o ci o e ci o I
U i i cn b cf c ad p povr d ovr havr navr D
sef lidm ll ltnm pcop l cop c op n op N
eh e asne ae aaeo ucrp e crp nnrp onrp O
Dtd C
Cuam Cs Ccvc S a pa W apa Ai pa Ci pa "C
1 N
BB 2
3 4
5 6
7 I
IM A
RU 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 R
TN 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 T
TA N
l t
SP a
r II r
o
/R MC e
p n
u G
S ID T
7 N
2 E
M f
U s
o C
W r
O EA e
1 D
IE t
VR ne a
W EA Rm g
E R
ia e
I sr P
V ea E
DP R
OU CN
___ T
. J E E E
_ D T T T YC A A N RN D D D O-M TA CN A-FU M
SR l
C ls AE
)
A 0
H_ Y U
V N
.E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP II LAA C
UF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
g n
n t
R l
si s
i s e
nr n
a eu e
s p
n s r wo o
N t n id i
udm e
i e i u op O
bw tn t
na t
t d
he d
t oo dro dr d al a
sa l
e m sR e
- c. I T
c d eec ee e c oi i oi a c u i s 1A R rol roe roe ret ipp l pp rh r i 8l ub enk mp mp mn nrr
.rr ieo m9l n a I
L.
E R A i
W E V ria orh o rl oii o
a o et p x e t
P A, E K O otw f pt f pt ftu ser ier t
atp ct g SL I
C R E
ca r
r rrd ihp rh p ah n mhm ah n IA V E P T
md etf etf een tp.
etp.
mtg gI gl P
U srl pco
- C E l
A B
eoe e
l pco.
ppo l
ae t
ae ii si sit R C e
oc ah r ah r pws eef1 ee u sfi srs srss sr iteu mteu a e swo0 sw o T
I R
R unf i rn i rne i p1 rihd ihd red u 0 u r
i oo oox 0
ewte xwte tc l2 l
O T
P T
n e nci n ci o nt t
c o c sne nl 3
nl e P
A o" h o s o sb ocss a ef o B ef o at oi25 oil U
itt i en i en i enp mcor cor dda if 0 ifb S
tl the then t roa n
p nn p nri t
e t
a aim atm atmo arir tas oas aor atl0 at c T
l uoh l
i l
ii l ost idnn idnn cp lib 1 li l
ubr c u gd u gd t ucns urog trog pco uua2 uud U
cf t
cn cn c c e d oii coii mar cdT0 cdl D
l s e
lid lidn l emd ncss ncss a p l n l n e N
aAdk asn asnu ahin ocie u ci e l np aonI aoi O
C" e s Cua C u aj Ctda C a vd Javd Cia C ciP Ccf C
"C E
BB 8
2 3
4 5
6 8
1 7
I It1 A
RU 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
R TN T
T 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
A N
/s SP tg II in
/R ui MC dt ES nt TE oi ID CF T
7 N
2 E
M f
U c
C W
O EA 2
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P VE R
OU CN E E E T T T YC A A A RR C
D D D O~
l"A N
(N A-FD 4
SR v
I C)
TS AE
% O SY d
W.E V
NO R
I)TE k (T CL EB S
SA L
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
l TP l
AA C
LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
nn l
y nef s
e sr N
r h
ido g
d na s
t pl o a e
O a
e e
o e
g er mve
- c. I t
i h
is h
n ha ans t r d f o l
fi s i n T
l u t
l s t
t n t
fi t e dru.
a e a
1A R L
abl n
an n
ao
,ot p e lt o tt ii L E R A ui aso ua so ni s) t sn eu ui l s a.
P o W E V t r cei t pl e i it rDti rw 7 rhl c r u c A u E K O ctidt csadt ba.
e(hf eo.
ota l
c l
joo S L I
C R E a tuc a nuc mld d g
dd) a v
a a
li IA V lE P
T
)
rlu
)il u oue idi,
its Er cl m s C E l
A B ev vnt evunt ln nowr s nh e eSfn d n.
e
- r P U se ecr s ed c r ccc saet suq sSog a
r It a R C T
I si is sitis dae ol o t osF s i
nig h n o R
R ut n n
uti n
acr c epn c
(
uenp a gn t
o p i
O T
a edo a gd o o e dh p e
e hom hii
- i pi P
T nv enc.
nvnnc.
l ef natu m nf s ntia rp f tu[
P A
or wa s oroa s he oe sh oad o td yom o as U
i e t fe i el fe dtr idg c isa i ra j,
a l
S t s esoc t s soc n t
n, a
t o
t ocr r
d n un a nb t n annt n any atit t atl afi e a e o co T
l o rta l oerta il l cdi t lc l
fh eh%
il I
uc isocr uceocr s r ueuu a uee u ei g U
c n pee c wpee dda crld crk cuti ee s ce/
t3 s ad D
l r a pf l l rt pfl aee l rcnd lra ll sh t m re i sd N
ao pufo a o e uf o osl aon o n aou aau oo os m na i
O C( sset C(bset Luc C ci c a Ccq Cvja NSf u O ib a C
"C E
1 N
BB 1
1 1
1 I
I 1
2 l
t 3
A RU 3
3 2
3 3
3 1
R TN T
T 1
1 2
2 2
2 A
2
~
~
t l
N a
d t
EO a
n UI o
e ST L
m SF l
en II a
l mo
/R r
a ers MC e
m rid ES n
r tva TE e
o xno ID G
N EEL TN 7
E 2
s M
n U
o C
W e
O EA n
t d i D
IE a a 3
VR n
a W
EA s i g
E R-ddb I
i aam P
VE moo LC R
I E
I I
CN E E E T T T YC A A A RE D D D O-I'A CN A-FU j;N I
IS JY E
)
O V
N E
O R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP lE TP l
AA C
L
! F t
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
c st s s s ss i rd cd N
n n nd m od e a e
y es O
eo e
eoo s aro h
f e
t I
hl r hih iS Jl ty i he u /
n cAT t t t ttt eSnd l
l thb n
tn R
L n s ae sRe e
h ed rnr a
ti o
ro t l E R A sn snm Sh el st eh e oia u r r i oi p
W E V ri g ri s
t sb ribt n e
qsef t t
ps awe K O eb n ebn ee na ew i
ndl yd o t a
pn gL I
C R E
dmi dmg nhd o c d ota i ec h ai a
t ued i ok:
i oi i t n pl ist at rs cwsn nn sm A V E P T
1 C E I
P U
sc rd scs b
asi se hb eue il no n eo i
I R C A B
n oe n e mr ep ns sto t
r h a oi g iidd T
od ws odd o ed r p on n i sa w" c ti rt n
I R
R ca u
ca ch o a co gh s rn a s oa at O
T o c oc thd pici cos ss,n e r
n P
T nli e s nli s
nit er ns su in.
ng id t ute l
A o
t r g o t
q oeene oe se etod o eb rgrn P
i i gsa e i gs:
e i mih i r y s c ai e i tl m g oi oo S
t n a F
t nad F t y bt t
rd a nct c t rb o n pt ppp ail s +
ail e t
abCmo ac aec aian aoaci pn pm T
l w ed D l wps U Qo li rn tfl e l pt w uo uo l
I uo o
uo u u sC c o um tit pl u r u ppt o ScSc I
I cl nh cl n cd t
csibs elce cuesl D
ll et
)
llee
)
l aee lib mr c alf l scrl
)
)
N aoh e 1
a oh r 1
a ohh y ae roo cuae a coo a b O
Cf w m
(
Cfwa
(
Cl ttl Cs acw A qc r Caawf C
(
(
"C E
DB 2
3 1
4 1
2 I
l I
l A
RU 4
4 4
4 1
1 1
R TN T
T 2
2 2
2 3
3 A
N n
EO o
i UI t
ST a
SP l
n II a
i
/R r
HC db ES nm e
TE oo n
LC e
ID G
T 7
N n
2 E
do M
ni f
U eat e
C W
c a O
EA nnc 4
D IE aii Vl t rf t
2 W
EA pei g
E R
etl I
c cia P
V cru E
I AcQ t
OU CN ME E E T T T YC A A A RN D D D O~
TA M
CN A~
FO M
SN I
Ts C )
6E JY 0
~.
M Y
N E
O R
I)
(
TE h
CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP H
AA C
LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
e e
s g
lhe e.
r N
s e
nn l
t etd t h ta O
,n n c oi a
ae o a t9 a-i I
ea sno n cw
/
s css htrC h
6 hs c.
sp d oi a f y o n tn i nd t se t r-t ei)
T A,
R I
rs ait re ib nl o ro taa s
pC e0 pv8 1
E R A e s ot a et l
ol i
oi s rpor t
sl S
s p.
sa t
P W E V vlll ap li at o t
ps l esl o i e adI e
I eh wE A
K O sai ri ou urdf a pnd i v u
t reA tdD t s S L I
C R E
nna nec td qoe t
uen a ens d aui a e a
E P
T ait gli n
pses nnsma t
,s ge s n ctf e ciS cl IA V I
P U
rd ei et no r palie eo i el ricno i cih ifW iehe C E I
A B
t ud s cr oc o ub t t iidd R C d aesroc d ul t diA d e t
t e ca i f s u rtn s nveoi nra nl nt T
I R
R
,i e d ap tf sfb oaat esei sdftf ituf i af i s l gg co s ai oi r
nil gd n ao sqo uo O
T P
T anat cc u n
r t utet aa uatcr n
n q nd P
A coriiirrr of yn t r gr n ri r t riier odes o
s oe U
il ou mmot e iotot oiooeroituml e iern i
en i mdI S
t hd sstsb t
iia pf p p p e h g d s eb tI ao.
t ro t r rd c niienm anrt pnpmot c nd ni c m aI i
a ai aoi T
enno eesou l oaan uouoran onoecu l oss) l s
lff e VaACSSICN uilrg S cS c pm AL aCSaN urei9 u si u i
l U
c ti ei c
pv6 cdv cdlt D
)
1 l a md s
)
)
))
))
)
l t a o9 ll o ll a
N c dei g a cii e a b cd ef g a oh r1 a er ao u
O
(
Ci s sd
(
(
((
((
(
C h s p( C wp C c q
C "C
BB 3
2 1
3 l
IM A
RU 1
2 2
2 R
TN T
T 3
3 3
3 A
/R sd HC en ES da TE ot ID CS T
O N
I EM 0
U 0
C W
O EA S
D IE VR 2
W EA E
E R
C I
7E V
R
CN E E E T T T Y 'C A A A RT D D D O I A' C'T AFO Si t I
TS
)
6E 0
S_ Y V
N E
O R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
l TP l
AA C
L1F 1
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
a d
s s
i gt d en d
e g
t e na t -
s r on e f o nh snn N
ap ii am e e l
emi fi as
- nei O
ha t
r he o
t amof lt i
nehd c, T I
th gone t msd i t eci la sl orwa yA R L
s nnet s
r aeet al eet cc o s i vi sl essc crrs uuhva nsl L E R A pU W E V el s si r e e rd e g u qctlt tie t e uegc t etov1 rasJ l
as o sc gC E K O SL I
C R E
ae o
atshl1 o
sa sve ntsi E P T
ct sdsn cs tae f n'r e IA V I
P U
is s eg i nevp i er r ino sers tc e nem C E I
A B
d esvi dd gm m s ra oef gt ecti R C ndrdl s nei eI deu phii orse r
I r
i et oae i msch artr.
pttsd de s R
io T
l shvd reit e oacoa u nee.
pe P
T nl t
n od t h
l a
t s,
ed s n
l g l
A oon ee1 of sd t sf sa gd us o3b n P
i ir gmh1 i eae etund enie e i3ei t
i te tdhl en l nno si ltv t
wr S
at s c p alteci b e ai t ot yb sl aaoe l oeidm l o x
anmts h sl aea l
ld T
uhd teI uc, gen wo ae t e rwtv urli I
U c
se c sn e o ph d t t ao ceas l re ace l rritv l mtn r
el ee ld n
D N
aohlxh aoesoi l oi e y o ylihh aino O
Cft cet Cfhung Acwmb Fb cntt C si c C
"C E
If 2
3 4
5 1
N BB 1
A RU 3
3 3
3 3
t TN i
3 3
3 3
3 T
TA N
n iEO do ni tI at a 5T ai SP smr II
/R sre MC eot rfi ES t er TE SDC 1D T
7 N
E 2
lt f
U o
C W
O EA 6
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P V
E H
OU CN E E E RY I
T T T Y
A A A D D D O
TA Cil AFi li S f I'
)
JY 0
V N
E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP l
AA i
L C
lF W
lCI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
R r
s yh'r r
d o s st c se e
d p d e ei e ed n
d N
p e
p oe rf h r etn o
O
. i un n
u nhh t awu huei dn v
- c. I ni i
sitt. ss t
tbi s
nn o T
1A R n ea e -
rc in s
ao r
a l
L E R A syht ssmni sf t a sr e
i p
el t nn ei ir ronf rt e r
ht PU W E V AC E K O in og ise e e eu eth p
ti gt f nh ci f yh d t dsnn dat m
gd ni SL I
C R E i n t s
ilt ei iroa i
o nn iu E P T
IA V l
P U l
iae l a nr sopm. sngc eo cd C E l
A B
ae wtd a nhi c nt m s n gn l c an R C uu a
uata ocoen oiif ro T
I R
R qged1 q itn cact o csr o
ey bc c
1 yw n g f
ai ee vry i
O T
nt nl e nt oi n
gl t ndd s
i a al e P
T P
A oa anp oiecs orooa o i o
tdwoh U
ifd am. jlc e i olid i gsi cnsrt t
r I c ti n ad t
avn t nn t:
euee S
ayos i atat ast e aio as f od t y T
lb cd e r l cd al l rnt m l wc rr f bi ab u c oh e uurdl uocom uo e E SL l
ct ahtt cdo e ct no cl n sb U
l r t
i l
cd p l cr c lle sm
)
))
D N
aun enr a yc n m aaooe aoh ee a bc C pI mi c CbaaI Cffdr Cfw nm
(
((
O C
"C E
I1 6
7 8
N EB 1
A rut 3
3 3
4 t
TN I
3 3
3 3
T TA N
SP t s II rr
/R oe MC pb ES pm TE ue ID SM T
7 N
E 2
l l
f U
e C
W O
EA 7
D IE Vl t
2 W
EA g
E R
c I
P V
E R
1
- lil'I I
i f
8
/
80
/
T 7
NR EE 0
MB MM OU O
.ve T.
R N
E E E 4
3 T T T YG I
A A A R H E.
D D D 0
S 1A t
CH S
M
/
AF U C
M SN r
I C
IS f
AE i
l k.)0 SY I.V NO h.. E R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
IC L
UF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
se N
en hl sl e.
ro u
O ig ie eflt ee t a eeb s
on hra l
c, T f n etl go r t e bo t pw I
l icg n no i
i i
yA R mo l
l sl y
ten rsep st e.
rs sol L E R A rk l sy Sa eeve ri z
er rcl pU W E V gC E K O ec tar s
v uiR ecnes to.
e a 3L I
C R E
du c a eCe al g diopr at dd E P T
ib esd iSl a l i ri a e u s iee gA V l
P U
s ren lib svsl sttrb lde sch C E l
A B
nt rco pA u e re nnctm ans nat.
R C os oac p o shep oeu e vas or s T
I R
R ci cre afd u tb m. ccrnm e e cbns w
bs o
gmI1 cto rr noe O
T nt n n o nne 0 nes n nat nu r P
T o
osr ost oemf-o nso oes o et P
A U
ieo.
if it ir o1 ifeei ih if gs t o ti t n4 ttt 5 toccs tsg ton S
a af ys ae
. ssu10 a ns a n a ag l t li rr l m2s i r - ltoae lti ltln T
uc utne ue.e ndte0 uctrr ucr u cfi l
ll ce cnmb c r8 c elsl1 ce ep cea ce d
.Ni lf l ei m li1 a l eib2 lf el m i
l re lfnn af adre au.r aina0 afuoo aih afoe O
Ce Ci pm C q1b C yU Tf C ed t c Cds C elb C
"C E
BB 2 -
3 4
5 6
7 8
IM I
A RU 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
R TN 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
T TA N
EO UI
- T SP II
7 N
2 EM f
U o
C W
O EA F
8 D
IE 2
VR e.
W EA l
U g
E R
c I
P V
A E
R R
E I
l' llll
!ljIl<
NR EE l&B k
M OU P
CN U
T MRA E E E T T T YC l
A A R3 O
M l
D D TA CT A
H Fo Sif H
I-C TS AE EME
)
0 JY V
NO R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
L C
l F W
lCI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
y a
d e
f s
e r e
h r
. i h
e m
td t
eo n 1
e.
s c
'r N
e t
d e
u l ee e
lf of0 O
h e ene h
l h
t m
olhf h
s
,I io t ni pI r t
n a
'a s tl i
bl t o t
,T t
1 A R L
ot s u o n o
n o
f we c25 L E R A s
r st s
o sb i
srrs so ou e. 0 pU W E V rne ti c rn g c r
m e en r
ll n3 gC E K O eep o a eo n
ed ttpo es.
l a n.0 3L I
C R E dl o nhf d
i s d
e s
ao i dns av o4 i or cu i s r i i
z k
uhss. ion c
2 1
E P
T gA V
l P
U sh p sin.
st a x sig C E l
A B
c.
l ei) sio sp n0 n
eh a s nc esa n sn R
C e
a r pv9 nti eido#
otn owmn oe bd o ri hs voao6 oat sl ei T
I R
R cl o d o
cf nl c er ce efh r9 ct c us ttt O
T oi efi f
eea va.
c s p1 oe l c r
P T
nbt nsot ne t
p n oes nn ns
(
nrn nd oe o
P A
o c ot a o e ei s o bn on onl e o n onbS p
i i f e i nd g
rl cn i f o
it i oal e if o ia e
U i
t os tton t n c gn o t
oni t s ti rbd t oc t
tnR S
a auie ni:
nnii a
ot ai atuao a at uo l t r l rt m l
ws oart l t c ld l ctcC l td l u r l
T uce ut nm uoe C P u cse u ueci uce uo tdl I
U ceb csio cll c een ce cnulC cem cl se e
NI lf m iioc llg
)
)
lfl n l g l n r pS lf s lli s p
ef e nnl e aon a b afoo ad aot pI afi au na m O
Cem CUvr Cf a
(
(
C eh c Ce CcsaA C ep Cp fibI C
"C F.
Tft UE 0
1 N
9 2
1 1
1 3
4 1
I l 11 iH A
RU 6
4 5
6 1-5 5
5 R
TN 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 T
TA N
s s
Eu n
n Ul o
e ST s
i stl SP t
t t u t
rd c II rr c
/R o ee ot e
MC ptn ps n
ES pl n pi n
TE u oo un o ID SBC SUC T
7 N
2 E
M f
U o
C W
O EA 1E 9
D VR e
W EA g
E R
a I
P VE R
oU
, CN E E E
~
T T T YC 8
A A A RU D U D O"
"(l AFD Sli I
IS
)
AE 0
S_ Y V
N
-E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
S A.
1 N l' l
K OL C
IP E
TP l
AA i
C LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
I R
e e
g e
t d
t i dt d
d s s N
a n
n a s nl e
l s e n
i l a le o
i O
d y,a o e
ed e e o eo r
n i t e, r
- c. T n,b hl w
n t
h I
pn vtd
- nt rn pn t e kd t t 1A R L
oi eue nucoi oiIf. pt w
n cl e u
l r
l ot e pd r
lti u s
o i el sc L E R A PU W E V pn enll stnpa pneal r rn hwg rr AC E K O po pel o ennuo popust eo s
t n ee SL I
C R E ai mh ub d e o sl aiml s
d d
fa dd tI wp unc tI a,i is a
l o i n IA V lE P
T P
U sa t
l o yr sa vtn st o a r su C E l
A B
euhadu c pd b o e uh e uU nc l
ina n s
R C sqti er nme s qt o
oe roe od r
T I
R R
ueirnt i otd n u ei nl n.
cf c s ei n cl e
O T
weis cl ee wel o f:
intt sb P
T nn tbi.
n ori nn hu s nes rrnah nw m
P A
oo eimnn odbit o o e w pr i i n unn ii c aon o n t eul t o
e ti c r oU o U
i go nt ug !f m t t ncc i t ot qr o t t n ad ei t ni et ecn to S
ac a
nt alueoi acaieht ait casl e a t
l nd n go c l
r r gt l ad r n s c l wc cpaal lt r T
ur r gn e urt ii nrrei e uoe E BC uc o I
ce oii pn casntd e e o tb e n cl n ce p U
l t cstin ei e n n l t ci m d n ll n
)
))
if p D
l N
ao cenl o ahnhoo ancroio aoo a bc nf u O
Cl ad u s c C sU w c c CI accsc Cf c
(
((
Ue s C
"C E
1R UE 2
4 3
N llB 1
1 2
I ll 6
7 7
A RU 6
6 R
TN 3
3 3
3 3
T TA N
s EO n
UI o
t Il rd c oee fti pd n HC ES pl n TE
- s eo ID SWC 7
T 2
N E
f M
o UC W
0 O
EA 1
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P VE t
I
tt UU CN TbE E E T T T YC A A A RN D D D O~
TA C1 AF0 S3 M)0 I
Ts 6E JY UE V
N O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP l
AA lC Ll F l
W CI E
L(
A I
V C
E 0
R s
o r
n t
N e
rsn r3 o
o r
O at g o
l ieh i
h o ee bn eeli hf ic s
t t
f uh
- c. T w
n a sI e n
a n e w s o
I gh o,s co t n t
c i
dtr ai 1A R l
odi r-d ay s h
e s e se tno L E R A l e r edk t
rn t
m d sl rr nil PU W E V l n e vnil ne eo gh e n s e eb s o o e f
C R E ait aawl af d ntrso gr r a th c mt E P T
ai ke a is epiei nauwrc sd nl IA V l
P U st r se p
ss st reucs ihtoenneeea C E l
R C A B
en c
eli m e
nc td qn n ed s cl s ailb m r so sitI sf oe s eae t a ul n omeu T
I R
R uc n usi uo cf tRtt e o e r ai ndh e c t O
T g
nl n f:
en s rl gt oe ac-P T
nsi neIi nr nen t egid c a sd rjiddl eg l
os s ot oo o g e m nd e ncr eesl e e pt n P
f.
i e e
J rd.
it i ci rdi k oiorct nsl c ii U
S trd teoen tc tns cecec clh e u s a tl u th p at atf ni aa aie nb a ga c chd u peidl cp l sl l a ir lf l wd o m pd rf ynt el x n r e o r o T
u l
umsae u uo CESEC o C A oR cEidRb a t I
H cd e
cidtt ct clt 5
p l tnni ll lll
)
))
)
)
)
il ll i
ae e
alaor ao aoo ah cd e fg h 1
J t
0 Cwl C ul cc Cb Cfb
(
((
(
(
(
C "C
2 3
1 N
BB IM I
A RU 7
8 8
8 R
TN 3
3 3
3 T
T A
N t
l EO UI o
ST sD t
SP rr II
/R oo NC ph ES pc TE un ID SA T
7 N
2 EM f
U e
C W
O EA 1
IE 1
l VR W
EA 2
E R
g I
z V
P E
R
,i ll iI1,1, l'1) t' f
/
80 T
/
!!R 7
EE 0
MB k
Mt t
OU O
.ve 7
R N
E E E 4
T T T YC 3
A A A RT G
1 D D D 0
S 1A M
C3 S
A
/
F0 C
M)0 P
i 1
t ME i
l JY 1
V N
iE O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP l
AA i
L C
lF l
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
e t
y t
ns fns l
a ete N
i i'r a
g a
l mt v y
O c
t sz n
u p
ooo rn ese n
di c, I ti n
ntt e mbb oa pl r esan T
-gA R
L mns n e icn;g n.
f s u ddna L E R A oeu g v
auan sr f
ht iaig pU W E V ch ni eine obi r od e yd o n tcc o r gC E K O ssos h ggst c y eh e c l o a oia yl e o.
gL I
C R E
s tie t
ialcfr d ci a rh eh nhf l
s gA V E P T
kdltd eseoaop i nlf etst.
wu.
a"th n a r e gl C E P
U cnoa sverb sapr peu s s l
n l
R C A B
e ab ul eld c osd n pu om rt eeas entiv h
ql sa nk t t n oeas r eel osmn li co T
I R
R c nk e e uvlii ca ch pehh o du o crsar O
T oi p
l wd e tre httb fi pt f p P
T niwnm n e e ok af y n
at nt o ntot ntirp P
A o nK oI o t pt oft onee o g k ol-a oomea l
i ni
. i nm il oi iihr i snei i ond iost i
t eitna tiIat l
t sc t ei gw tbon tFnnr S
attcii ar il eei.
nd n a s yak a ie a" aio T
l l a r l pe rflhb n ieoo i
l sf r-l rtm l
r f
l udlrne u oh elitio uctc ueioi uoam ustn ceieet crtt s
xi cu li cr chl o ce an ldrht l
D l n tvi l p ienret ldee ci l coc itd o
N ai n ni r a pn rh e ol c anuh adunl a ni e nI noi O
Ch oi gc Caicttff a Cidt C aJaI Cavr Ciatt l
C "C
5 6
7 8
N 1l 1
1l I
A 5t 8
8 8
8 8
9 F
R 1N T
T 3
3 3
3 3
3 A
/R ot e HC p'e t ES pb a TE uml ID SEP 7
T 2
NE l
f l
o UC W
2 O
EA F
D IE 1
2 VR 1
2 W
EA 0
g E
R c
I P
V A
E RE R
I lll\\
MM OU CN T
U E E E RW C
T T T Y
a A A A O
D D D M
IA FIl N
AFU Sf i
I' TS 6E
)
0 S_ Y
.V N
E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I.
C NI I
K OL C
IP l
TP E
l AA lL; C
lI W
CI E
LT I
A V
C E
ii i<
i<
e eo eo t
yg R
sw n en r s
tl tl i
f n se N
eod o wo.e.
e.
als al u
e iiir O
sl e s
t ep ts cae ca ed r c t yl r l
est 0snr u
i n hn:
a e t tt
- c. I i
o e d
e bt ns3ti o dfl df s t on d
w pA l
T m
nfd a N n i n n ph noa noe cg n
IA R I
n i
o s e p oS e c i v i r s i o
,d nfit L E R A r
PU W E V i
l n em iS md n e
et rns l
sa t t ae s
AC E K O h
t tf n c e c3 rd l ns l n d d tf a
n u s s
o chd t - eea ycs ycs eoe s dh oi en nt o
SL I
C R E E
P T
o, c no n a ad u2id n ree rex is no ed d um IA V I
P U i
e o ttdd3ueo arr aro stx e rn s n C E I
A B t n e nn i s t e e 2 qb i eet eeb nco nn ha e o xf s R C ae r oost iabr ems lfs lf o eb oos t
o c o T
I l
l t a
pitc d m
.ren ce cen.
l R
cf pl t
, d
,b ua mtna t e yc a
rt o
T ro fn mtn
,s cl s oce mn tegnp n/i n/id neo oce sg n t no P
T ipt ceng u e ei pn e x oeu oet e o i can en oioia P
A n
c t onsmcl cSi-ie i cd i
ccs i gt ro ci U
ui t i
cd e de i n gaI atd auo at'u ain at mlt s ncl cw t rn trnu t nc denit tdt ai S
ef a t m y u n j n pI T
edl o n o r tidi o 6 pe n oc.
ojs l wu ono pi i on l
l hd e
LI cP sM a sCGSb a us us e u oj LI cSf n cuir I
t e c ed c eu cl e
Jv U
D b
g
))
)
)
)
)
l el e l ell lld
))
)
l y
f m n ab c d e
f ahbs ahba aen ab c
a nr N
I ei
((
(
(
(
(
Ctau Ct av Cfa
((
(
C aoir O
C "C
3 4
1 2
N HB 0
0 0
0 I
Il 9
l A
RU 1
1 1
1 R
TN 3
T T
3 3
3 3
A N
/
l II ui
7 N
2 E
M fc UC W
3 O
EA 1
D IE VR e
W EA g
E R
a I
P VE R
t1 ft I
0U CN MD E E E T T T YC A A A RU D
1 0~
1 1A
-tN M
A-FU Fi H
l I
C)
TS 6E A0 JY TV N
TE 0
R 1)
T E, O (T Cl EB S
SA I.
C NI I
K OL C
IP E
TP l
A. A lC IF I
I W
C. I E
l(
A I
V C
E R
t y
s e s
t r
i f
s r
d h d
e u ol u
i n'r N
- eo ont on n n f a dh O
c i.
t cf hg -
hg o r
n nt e e nn ti gd ti g
- c. T
- p. so on pnr erd esna csnn I
1A R nf ce nn s? u da e meI n
= ei o l
s ot ii t
ies.
dti s dt L E R A
PU W E V
eic en r ttc fus e a p e ag i
t e hilne oaa ye p
h1 ud m hlun AC E K O
f ar t
awt nhf lrsa t1l ea tlli SL I
C R E i
ri snoi IA V l
P U
E P T tu.
r/dr eanl ead l
td s e oh r s C E i A
B n
aeat s pvi c s pv a s R C a e-eugsc eeas ecos emeb emeop u ni slo osmn l rl sI mt sI l a T
I R
R q
et u ah s n du o cu e u noi u n r O
T pl vt ag fi oep eecu e ed t P
T n
u n
r i n pot nsli nhh d nhh e s P
A o t m ol oss o s.
a o bp ot wf n ot wn e
il i n ne i rnd U
ea i
oo i ie i
t ua.
t oeod tton thwe t na c S
t n a 'm i ap nd t
al ei a si e atol aiis aii l
nsr l
rtl l/t m l
l o l
rtn l
rop T
u oao n ph cl u pa m uelh uneco unec I
O c c p
eirt ee cml o cca-cet e cet e
i ep l n r p l aoc li e
l viI g l *iel W
ndso aifi m ali e aff n aitf n a1 rh o O
C eus C e odI Ccvr Cioo C ge ei C gc th C
"C E
TR 5
1 2
3 UE 4
5 H
- l l
l 0
1 1
1 1
1 Il I
l 1
1 A
RU 1
1 1
1 R
TN 3
3 3
3 3
3 T
TA N
II p
/R HC m
ES a
l TE ID C
7 T
2 NE f
M
__ c U
C W
__ 4 O
EA 1
D IE VR
)
W EA g
E R
a I
_ F VE R
l j
l I
M
/
80 T
/
fR 7
EE 0
iB ftt ttOU O
Cf l
.v T
e R
M E E E 4
b T T T YC 3
A A A RT 1
M D D D O
5 lh N
M" l S
/
FU C
- i C
bf
-P Ti A
N)0 AL l
St f
TE V
3f0 R
1)
T E.
(
Cl T
EB S
SA l.
C f
1, I
f K
OI C
t W
C. (I E
f I
A V
C E
i e
r R
mt i
aas td l
d l
oe N
rui e
i o e r a
ggs O
u i t hs em dsa o
oy f n dti r
ne c, T I
rll i
aod ee e
c ie) gA R L
pnn d s.
o l' u uh rn E R A n
n eu l
te t
ego.
L pU W E V o rf a sc fie s
h el gC E K O eo uo eogr en tdtd I
C R E
nt e
i d
i nh pi ae 3L l
E P T
euel s t yot y
f,ri gA V l
P U
l pl t me.
tl te os f
C E l
R C A B
l mb avn ei l s
eti eoag rao rcdl tu T
indcc I
t R
rcpn gh i eana n
ooee t
o T
ai o
t d pa er inpp p
T necm rna ia n.
mo t
os I'
A nt r
poc s c eI s ef af n U
iaeo ii n s n l
o y
S ti rf rtf o gr s o ed i l
nrar eai cr eti e trmt i
T i p e tlr tvrt rt eeoc n ob p ue lysoc ec rbde i
l t
ere pcv ernpe pe cmer it l pl y ml d r a pr ol ouer D
N a [;bl oaA oarui re inro O
Cawe CcQ Mctnd Ps D(fc C
"C E
1 2
1 1
2 3
a 1
t I
1 t
A RU 1
I 2
2 2
R TN T
I 4
4 4
4 4
N sn i
i t
Eo t
Ul a
ST gr l
i S l' re a
td II r
/R li tC c
es t
ES n
dn TE e
loo ID C
fC T
7 N
2 E
f l
t U
e E
W O
EA s
5 D
IE c/t s F
1 2
W EA m s sd 2
V!!
i i E
R stl i 1
0 t
g sat i
I c
P V
eene A
E SDAl R
f R
I I
lltll ll ll t
]
l!lil l
1 f.
8
/
8U T
/
ltR 7
EE 0
ftB
\\
i1 tt
.oU O
.CN
.v T
e R
M E E E 4
L T T T YC 3
31 A A A RH 1
D D D 0[i 5
M 1A CT S
A
/
M FD C
S )0
_ SN -
C
. T';:
A I
P 6E T.
JY 1
TV N
E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA 1
C NI I
K OL C
IP E
TP l
AA l
L C
IF I
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
t t
R y
n e
f e
e b
o.
r i rln e
r id r
t rao l
et e
e N
h a
ed t e o s oni l
hn h
h O
t re it c,g cit a
t e t
t
- c. I e
s at dn dc my T
IA R ry e
n ne e gn eun n
i hl n
n l
se os hti htu ei
'n c e A
ab oc.
E lt L
lJ i
t n ns ce tir tiJ r
at a
l PU W E V E K O sd ad oe r
da g
ad sta nd ad A C.
I C R E
ee ere ir yp sne sne e.
nti oe ie S1 i t uer tp re reh r oh st E P T
IA V I
P U
ta dl e ie ar ebs elt eas I
p tu eu oar is rs E
C R
IC A
B il od dr d
d d
sln tto c
t cu sti n
ny i
,d idf suo i rr ee ae T
I R
R i m e s oy ul sin sno emi dop sr mr O
T ri inn c1 oe nna na nit npp a
a t s t oo 1
bt oi o s f sc o pa t
t P
T t
A n
iic dn.
n cx, cee f
e cu cs cn P
e) ct nel er ol es ivr se.
i ee.
ee.
S c1 icy eie r, u s a srs tii y/ r ris ris ct rul td nc itn.
i ee std rtcd rti r t 's T
ec.
t rr rso rc sI os svu.
c al e ors or I
el nte e1m oa y oi e y sf s pee datl cey cey l
dre esp b1 h
ldss l nI e mre ndne pl pl i
iD nrd cno mne ce anrs n al x arr unid eoa eon
- o. c m oo cor leeh nr nooe nrto l oh oooo hrn hrn N
Ecp rt Aa Actn A t sb C ct Bcpm T pa T pn O
1 f
C "C
E I: I UE 0
I 2
3 t
BB 4
5 6
8 9
i 7
1 1
1 1
1 l
1 F
A RU 2
2 2
2 2
2 7
2 2
7 R
TN T
T 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 A
/R lC lES TE ID T
7 2
N E
f ll e
U C
W O
EA D
IE F
l VR 7
2 W
EA 1
g E
R 0
I c
P V
A E
R E
t I
I l!
lll l
1
CN T
/
N E E E RW G
T T T Y
A A A D D D 0
M
- 7. lA fl A
A I
TS AE
)
0 JY WE V
N0 R
1) k (T
T E.
Cl EB S
SA l.
C NI I
K OL C
IP lE TP l
AA C
LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
tr r
s N
e o
a l
l e
a a
i s
O r
e p
l
. c c
r n
I a
h p
u l
- c. T t
i i
s d
u tt u IA R s
nei b
e ge t
t n
n f
uy yd e
t nntr tr ta.
u t.
l L E R A r
du tl l o h
r ofre re rrt o
. id PU W E V e
nt e t
t m t
olf ov ov ote bd dt AC E K O t
a ch nc c
p op p
p s e nn SL I
C R E e
at oe ee s: po po po pof m n oi IA V i P U a
eef r
ru et s ns
.s
.s o
tf e
E P T
m d
nr rc rs u td u t ut utf ei cf C E l
A B r
tho do od dc eo et et e
s e yd R C T
I a
tt nc ce i e n ul n u ef u ef ud yd r
R R
p o n a
r sf id id s od s od a s ay
'O T
l so e
s nf i
f f
o y dl PI T
t e pet cr ao oe n snnsfgsf gsl dl nt A
l t
.t ia wt c
o rnoronronr n r uc l
U ua scn r
g eii e i e i ee n e t
S ai atr t s.
yd sn sbd sbddbdlbs p
- o. re f r wau.
end re ii r murmanma a mr s o
r u
1 T
ep m gm moe t y sw o et oeoeeoeee m r mo l
d o l
i e mil eo.
yo TmiTmlHmlBmv e p ec l
l r
etft yte ml e ll I'
l p dons scd m pz al
)
)
)
)
n e se t
t N
l p O
A a iol oy reo ymi no a b
c d
yr yr pcs Usm Ses Af
(
(
(
(
S a Sa t
C "C
5 6
7 8
N 1 :
1 1
9 0
I lt 1
1 1
l 1
2 i
l A
RU 2
2 2
2 2
R TN 2
7 T
T 4
4 4
4 4
A 4
4 f
f EO UI 3T Sr Ii
7 2
N E
f M
o UC W
7 O
EA 1
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P V
E R
(
Ct i
E E E T T T YC b
A A A RII D D D 0 M
'II 1A Cll A
N F0 ii ft
~
I
- 1s
)
6l i
jY 0
V N
,I' O
P I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA t.
C NI lr OL C
IP E
TP t.
't lL F u
lCI E
L(
A iv C
E R
nr t
t N
s oem n
n O
e l
l nt :
ct e ge dd e
c, T ss c2 ol a ad i ym tdj t
a j
eic mne c
n I
s eI nc ne eI n n hl a ear a
gA R l
at nnU or o
a n e, e rd sdp d
L E R A mns e i aG smt sm fb t f aa yem a
pU W E V ee r d-p c
p s u s og szor gC E K O dmt u grS ome omy mes y ef b yc o sf gL I
C R E
eea t
no/
l ep l er er s nro ul i e o
E P T
pl m c i cC etS et o t eab o sarvld gA V
l P
U mei u
l c vs vst ih u i sn noaeu n.
C E l
A B
u x r eat e ye eys t n s t nos l aihdl os h C T
I l so t
d s
dss dsl g
e aoim a veocim t
l R
sr s
oni.
n l
nne t
cit e u s ab m n t e U
T f ep mil 0 neo ne iew n
it ct dih i
ct I
I' T
onpl k
nt p ot e wht e
f pas il' A
a a m d c4 i eee as l
ns.
t am.
owe c imry vlbhhh ry i
gl u eee t
ies tii s S
niyt t
mh n aaRi H b a t uen i e tt c es t
l ue a yo i uoay larTi d
j sstb dds i
I tl c srco l p s p s oend usnu not ofis tb T
nu uoay f ro a J ai s I
I mIt owis e s sfht cr l
cr l
ei U
ddo e brt c pra pra edtd
)
)
l D
l N
ieel'i ueie apon apon hic n a b
ncl S pwS CafA CafA Tsa a
(
(
t O
C "C
I'R 1
2 3
4 5
N iE l
2 2
ti 2
2 2
I H1 2
2 2
2 2
A 1t t
RU i
TN 4
4 4
4 4
T TA N
I 7
t 2
i t
E f
t l
o UC W
8 O
EA 1
D IE vR 2
W rA g
E R
c I
P VE R
uU C1 1
T M
E E E T T T YC G
A A A R11 4
D D D 0 ~~ 1A M
CIT A~
FG H
l'Sll C
i.!
Ft
)
A 0
J_ Y WE V
N O
R I)
(
TE CL T
El t
S SA 1
C I
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP II A. A C
iF l
l W
CL E
L(
I A
V C _
E R
tc r
r e
t pd e-e N
r n,m n t e k
rl et O
r e
.n er a
an oa n hn s
t
- c. I c n r E o
cd l.
I e
o i e t t o
t e go T
p yi nu cn I
r nl IA P.
lA i
etS yl.
el t uli ne t eng it.
e L E R e t pnS l
am es a t atI m ase s sn5 PU W E V
h c
e tt e h nd c cvl a
rnhs e uc.
AC E K O
SL I
C R
E ce.
t e
7 cnt t oeI a
e nd n eowi d
i1 p
rh ees pif m m one l p i rf E
P T
IA V l
P U
s s set y rmy ssli su siue e sd y v oi n C E l
A 1
s e s re od s ri p.
st a
crsn r
ph e
ep l
ras e e pl er atfb ceec ofl a R C I
T I
u s u4 o v cne u tm5 ucyces A ue p nmt R
R n
fi uh. el a.
ebiha r u.
oa O
T n o nd t
nft nhu 1
np fth doe 1 ni s
P T
o p.
onnc o ot me osdi e
oore7 l
lP A
o t es i r) i aee i ef i df i
elf ye il cr:
1 i
ad e i
t ed t
ep tho tfmoo t ei pI ct rf f
t col S
a re t
al s at aoum aslm na e a 3
aim l
n l i ae l
y l
rr l n pa5 el P e r m3 lf - r T
n u ri uivr usc ueti o uoi
.uu ht e uiio l
c of p
c,aE c e. n cuctt cpte1 qc ot ct n c ttt ll l
i oe l
1 t e ll el c l sld el r
- sa l sl c l
r i
a l r aon1 aiu a a pu a ae uof ra ef pyh a uua N
C f(
CdI0 Cmq C v s mf Cr mmof c Zosst Cjmf O
C "C
E Tt t
l E i
2 3
l 4
6 it f l 1
5 7
l t ti l
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 A
RU R
TN 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
T TA N
t E0 n
U1 e
s S1 SP l
i nc s II vi y
/R l
itl lC u aa ES qt n TE ESA ID 7
T 2
N E
f l
l e
l lC W
9 O
EA 1
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P VE R
l
Mt OU CN E E E T T T YC A A A Rll 1
D D 0 1
1A Cl Al N
FTt O
S I
TS
)
6E 0
JY V
N E
O R
I)
T E.
(
Cl T
EB S
SA Il.
C NI K
OL C
IP E
TP ll A. A C
tiF l
W CL E
L(
A I
V C _
E R
t s
s c
e N
e l o e
t u l
i
,I nu r t r
nl
- O i
d r
ea am n oe o
cvE
,T t
l e mcn ca r i gA t
R A L E sfi ng r
e gd ro c sai i c i e et pn pU W E V e
n eds gC E K O i
i dr e nre t e 7 pi 3L I
C R E i e u i od p
mt gA V l
P U
nb q bc ss sa E P T
C E lC A
B R
nm e mce e
edd T
ou r oat se s n I
R R
cn[ c a.
us
- uta, i
ni s n
n y O
T t
ef nirt no neEl P
T.
etf o pn op.
o cS e P
i U
l n o i noe i s) i rSv ti teri t ed t e i r
F ar t
aspe nre a pe t T
l pu l n pr i n l
hc uo c uoai nri u4t e l
ll tr cp u eo[ c p
l t
pit l
)
seq l oe ldrs i
apn aelie alr anoe tu Ca a Crtr Cf( C aI r C
"C E
2 3
4 N
l 1 t
ii I
lt t
A RU A.
4 4
4 i
TN 4
4 4
4 T
TA N
EO UI n
my
/R al l C na l
T 2
N E
l f
l c
U C
W 0
O EA E
2 l
I VR 2
W EA g
E R
H 1
c P
V E
fM 0U CN E E E RY Y
T T T A A A 1
D D O
1 IA_
Cl AFh_
Sf_
b i
I TS
)
AE 0
J_ Y V
N E
O R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA l.
C N l.
I K
Ol C
L C
l F l
W CI E
L. (
)
8 f
V C
?
E d
in R
n w n
t f
r e
o e:
e a
t e
h N
ti is e
l a
h t
s e n O
n t vm d,
fb u
i t?
e e
s h o I
e p ee et o
P.
c r nos hf t e w
ti c, T rt dn e"
l a
t g
t o ch o
s t r gA R
L n u i / er n sl asv l ni e t L E R A
i s n s
ee) snw ck uil sn s
sio v h ;n fi pU W E V
n s eg n ctl eoo s
ct n s w eo f
s e gC E K O
n a e n o xaa n pl efen o eda ti yo y n r
gL I
C R E o
bi i el c esl pIh ei rer at l
E P T c g w
t (o
l eo a(cm t sd ca rt reih gA V
l P U n s o css l
b rf h
o a su ic ac avt c
ll o C E lC A B si tl enny a
ssmmi i r di ee eea a
R T
I tl ll l oet nl e eu r sno nf lj ll c e
R R
l e uo firil oah d pl d a ye ii cb c i O
T ud sf ettla srt earn v lhs s.
u.
nd n
P T
so e d a si n nu thba awn t sn tsn toni P
A ere re m bo at n csi s n o eao e/o elI U
r h
e rd ai rci e
l e s aei eli eei ea e
S e
et g ol t s u
l ei c e lt hct hlt hin n
eh T
i h
rfesr erd idur r eba s a st a sva o
l l t t r aei:o ht e:
eoqo t h al yl il e d.
s l
t o LdY1t t sk s DPEFS t eu rtu r t.i rrs l
i h
ef ca D
ct.
v
)
))
seee
))),)
cc eec e c e eke N
ri ad a bc ahhr ab cd,)
eel vfl veI vev rv e rra oaa oha ohi oe O
Aw He
(
((
Ht ca
(((((
Atc Csc ct c Ctgwl C
C t"
1 li 1
2 3
4 3
t 1
2 1
t N
A RU 5
5 5
5 R
TN 1
1 1
T T
4 4
4 4
5 5
5 A
n.
ttan t
1I
/R i
l e MC u
um ES n
cu TE e
l c ID R
ao 7
T CD 2
NE f
t f
e UC W
1 O
EA 2
D IE l
VR o
W EA no gr g
E R
1 it P
V sn E
eo t
I DC il
tloU Cf l
T N
E E E T T T YC
\\
C A A A RT I
0 D
I D
1A M
M" T FU H
SR I
C T ::
6E S )0 JY WR V
N E
O I)
TE k (T CL EB S
SA t.
C NI lK OL C
IP E
TP l
AA l
L C
I F I
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E a
R l
d ee 1
s y
l t
t e-rh. u nl r
r.
a a
a t a atd m
hor N
s ee s nn s c
l l
al e
c e O
I nl I
I w i i
u u
ru hf t h
usp e, I r ai t
rh t. a l
. e nt o
t c
c ec c of cr sd o
,TA R l
ni i i ie ai l
e mt e es ed n
ad cd a
en htt hi,op L E R A
pU W E V
e e k ee e ce ne t
c.
gc.
wl n wt sl gC E K O
h ae. h e cl hr h t
ai d
ue o n s I
C R E s
ht shee se t
ea tf ed eee ssd n o" i L
E P
T n t e thv b
a ht pi he rhi nei ooit
,A V
l P
U ni e n ce nm m t s ec ti atf or i t tn, C E l
A B
o hh oy l ou ce f
i i e t
ais R C id t s ibd i n s f y cp fi hft t ar ad zre T
I l
R t ci t
nn t
i ol as ot con a a mei pt t
ai wr adao ay r
n i e l s rt nt a o
I r
T l r e
l e i l1 n
ea es se htd uan ot nol tP A
uf t v utrs u1 c
se ti nd wlJ c o ft go ct no caoi cn nl e
ei u
ldt ni rF e
i n
l ec ldtv li t.
pc ia i
sse aet i s o" d t S
a yt a/ae at at r rt t e ger ct a n
e n T
cl se cdnr cn l c us pr ar nra al na ned e tl.h ei e ue pl oe t a i rru gr gh d m l
hn st hn i hu cr rt i
li i
wat eec itit e u i
D ce :
cgs e cq l r en pl mn a o h nl s
s b c l
ai on airn ae ao h o pr io r si t ea ee esm o l
Ec co Esoe Es Cc Ti Ac Li Dat O gc Dhdaed o
C "C
I I
l l 5
6 7
l l 8
3 1
2 3
1 2
I i i t
A RU 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
3 3
3 R
TN T
T 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 A
l f
E0 U1 s
ST t
SP e
n I I s
ne
/R o
gm llc p
iu ES r
sc TE u
eo D
P DD I
7 T
2 N
E l
f l
e UC W
2 O
EA 2
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
c I
P VL R
CN E E E T T T YC A A A RN D U D O~
lArT ATO SN I'
TS JY
)
E 0
V N
E O
R I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I
C L
NI K
OL C
IF E
l TP l
AA C
LUF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E i
R u
t d
d s
d p e i
l e r n m
oe.
mil w
au e a e
N n
O e,
r tds ci t n
e e
cl t
l dn o
ue ert i-r t
r l
nd h
c, T yi s' e ncn gc dc e
hd i
I o
f tl c t
u a
n o
ee e
I I
gA R l
l s on ane nlim el n a
t a
t rl t
L E R A c
a V
ti ci vir ica sae t
s.
t y n a pa i
pU W l
gC E K O nv l
e e z r
uce a. ia a.
nl i r mi 3L I
C R E ee l p l sf i eg b
dd si ds i r r t. o r
E P T iR ai eie l vo sf e nr t
a i d
c e 7A V l
P U
c i c r r ii r moe C E l
A B
tfi oe tn de u ee t
rs n
t gp a v R C i
ct ue el qrs ei T
I ee ei eof u rna.
pi i pm sc e ao r r
R R
rl td cio s,
gohd nt sr nu u r
l a c O
f nt a/
nt st e.
oi e in ic ic e
nc P
T i
my eat nut rt ai e
o sr s o s n P
A nT r
dl s ooar pntf fd an fd ha ni y n g
U e
et s nui i td e rai oi t E o n
o t1.
ei S
cye csd ocl t n r ed r af d in i al i s
a i,b nbt nur pl m en e sy ds se t o t ma t
e T
e a eda sae rru t env el e
ei pl pru pd l
l rdD rnd ech u pe n u go.
cr td cf mt mit m
i ee ein r t
c b l
p i ra u ri ua uf n uh D
f ud f
a re l
rmd meta ue pe ur sl s ne s t
1 el n eot ohn aeun oha.
ol nh oe s u.
s ov si fU Rf a Rts Cti Ctna CtlQ Sc It Sv Ai A ce A w
C "C
2 3
4 5
2 2
3 N
TI3 1
3 1
IM I
A RU 4
4 4
4 4
5 5
5 6
6 f:
R TN T
T 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
A N
s EO s
a n
LI t
o I
ec ST a
i n
D t
SP e
II r
p
/R t
m HC e
u u
f ES p
s e
TE n
s R
ID I
A 7
T 2
NE f
M o
UC W
3 O
EA 2
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
a I
P VE t
I
A A A D D D O
lh
~
Cll AFU 7.l i
IT'B
)
4i 5_. U 0
V N
E O
R I)
T E.
(
Cl T
EB S
SA I.
C l
NI K
OL C
IP E
TP I
lC. (I E
I A
V C
s i
E R
n
- w s
g o
d do i n gn i.
n
- i e
lh e i i g n
cd s
l N
f t e n
l n nt p
fl e
y ne t
r O
oii i
u es i
i n n r.
m.
e c, I u
l tt e
. ex
- dt iy ynp.
eoe it r
r ei l
T i
l t,
l sd he e
l so t
yA R I
t too d
dr c ier i cd dr n nn on e l
tl L E n A
c o
e t
d oi c
o ct na irtro tte dp s l
ee n cf lw i
pU W gC E l
V n
y ac deaop eni ep h c
rd oni i
i K
O
,ti l
i nl tb p k et t u t
u cat i
C R E 3L I
sl e
nc itn u ss as g.
e t y l n s 3A V lE P
T ntd u
o o el s /en c
nd r
cl
,l e ed C E l
A B
P U
o ue i
a q
i s, y ml sri oe ee a ut s ed ti R C l t i
tig lf uat gp lli l n rc eci ag T
I R
R a.
t n
a n rormi ned t
nf e
sr ii e i r i s t e cs ci a sr u
vni a tsu ire s e i
O T
e aon eow css d w
s n rn ae z r
l mr d P
T po s li a it nrn a yu o ao pd i oo p a nr t
I' A
r erl i etr cisI oo rl i
r s
t c sr Ii U
cot ad i
e i
gms,c des t
sy y
es S
d t ca t
t c tn a
tl tl t
ts thg gt o aol r roe nliage naol il ir i. ii itn ni T
m rl u o olh i c nh gri u ua l
e c p p
t w aleit iut c dn tue un u u oi i u l
p dw dt d
t w
i ll el p
pg at cb sca n
D no io no nn ndt a
l ora u unn ituuo eci a
oi or oh oe oni r o l
N A t ac S SI o Dantt Dan c Cn Cp Cs Cm C af D c OC "C
E TR a
UE l
1l 2
3 4
1 1
1 l 1
2 3
4 5
6 l
1-l A
RUl 7
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
R TN 5
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
T TA ne g
N n
a EO i
UI l
s C
t SP i
l ST t
Ii i
i g
u i.
/R t
i B
l C d
s l
n ES e
s o
TE D
A ID C
7 T
2 N
E l
f l
c U
C W
s 4
O lA g
2 D
iE nn vl t
gi 2
W EA w
i g
E R
sa c
I P
V ler D
E I
R
,lg
tl tlOU l
Ct T
N E E E C
T T T YC A A A Rl M
l D D D O~
TA Cl Q
l AFU C
Sl i
I A)
TS 6E 0
S_ Y WE V
N 0
h (R 1)
T E.
Cl T
EB S
SA 1
C NI l
K OL C
IP lE TP l
AA C
L
.UF W
CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
N e
,n O
e p
ew t
r n
y y
- c. T w
t y
dl eh
,e I
o n
t a
n IA R o
l el r s eme l
L E R A
s
. z y
h y
r da dc zdh td i
l s
b e
dn eens i et PU W E V
AC E K O
n e s
. e p
eo s d oi sb SL I
C R E e n e
d t
e d
o bi odc
,mn IA V l
P T
n o r r
ee a r
e.
r ms l e s E
eo P
U oi e a.
rl u
C E lC A B a.
lh p
en cbft e
R p s b d
ai q
it e
mor pd n T
m n m.
se a e sg ag e
om se og ynw I
R R
o e ed t n st d en t n r
ti spn t ao
'e o e pi O
T c m me ni ee a li ee a
d
,h l
i if td ow dl d
s gt guw t
P T
i lf oe a e
s l
P A
lia se t e a dsa l n t
U a
ai pd y r.
l r
e1 en nr r ye r oos r y rc pl ad td rn t o ea.
ot rd bii S
ul ue gy t
e l
aa ai m d hi,e t
g T
t r t p nl t c sl oe l s hse c m sh e r ch n c e cs ir ee ei bh s,
pn cet nieth oeti l
i u p u ka sr ce t
de ee ata axt ot h jgw tD r o re re sr at l
l z sm t ac oa cona N
t r t r ol uo re l n ei ai tl o nrl rn nrer O
S p Sa Wc Gc Bd Ao Ws Bd A pl A ppo o A pld C
"C E
3 4
5 6
2 1
BU 1
1 3
4 f
i l
It 3
5 5
A RU 3
3 3
3 3
4 5
5 R
TN 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
T TA i
N 1
l EO 1
a UI n
e r
ST t
g us SP e
as tl II D
rl ti
/R oi I
ua d
ha F. C I
rt S
l ct TE e
ne t e SD ID W
AD 7
T 2
N E
f ll c
UC W
5 O
EA 2
D IE VR 2
W EA g
E R
I e
P VE R
.l i
l l;
t t 0U CN Y
N E E E T T T YC b
A A A RU D D D 0F H
'A 1
Cl A
N FO Sll C
I TS b )O 6E JY UE V
N O
R I)
T E.
(
CI T
EB S
SA I
L N I.
I K
OI C
IP lE TP l
AA C
L U1 N
C1 E
L(
I A
V C
E e
R l
i t
NO n.
e, t
s t
I mi r
s e
i
- c. T e en:
el o
d s
u 1A R L
th e
t f
t t f
I e
n d
a t ct n
r o
sc o
n L E R A
r en o. o yn s n d
p o
PU W E V
of pi s h y
su d
o n
s c
AC E K O
poS r st s t
j o i a
e SL I
C R E r
p dr
. i d
r t
r r f
n IA V l
P U
E P
T o sl o ao f s c ng a
n o
o w
C E l
A B
ctl r op ot a an n u o.
s e t
o R C nl ep l p r
p i
o q
. ik t
d c
g d
T I
i u pp u yo a sd e s t c i o a r n k
s R
R s ma l s t p c.
pu s
p ce u m f
o i i
e O
T neI a
i p s ml d
n m nh d t
S nl P
T nr s nr 1 u l p nc n o a rc n d e c S u e lP A
i i/ ga ie 1 s am l n o
il e
o i d a R n
ts n dv t
t a ci l
t c t e c g o f
S t
a S
a gI s ue ce nl c
nc i m l
p l n we tl uz oc rs.
t n r in h r -
g e. i e
T ui oi ii de z i el s c r e a c i n l s u r
I U
cdld gt p i n gee a e g et n S t
i bd b c
l nl u nn da ra nd x p
t n ns a S
D y u a -
s i
N ai ot oa
'r r loe ioo m ni oi r
R C
fb F mb I
II Cd B S
lu r o o si CffS Lc Rt O
P Dl Ad f
"C E
lTR i
tE 0
1 2
3 1
2 3
4 5
6 8
t nn 7
9 1
1 1
1 l
ll l
A il 1
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
t U
R Tf T
T 7
7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
A l
l EU UI n
/ P.
T 2
N E
f l
t c
UC W
6 O
EA l s 2
D IE ae VR 2
W EA ii g
E R
cd eu c
I pt P
VE SS R
t
,i
I 1
l it.
a M.
/
80 T
l
/
lR 7
EE 0
MB MM OU O
.v T
e R
bE E E 4
T T T YC 3
A A A RN 1
M D D D 0-5 1A Ci S
l N
A
/
F0 C
F11 N)0 I -
P T ;:
A 6E D
T.
JY TE V
NO R
I)
(
TE CL T
EB S
SA I.
C N I.
lK OI C
IP E
TP l
A. A iC
! F l
W CI E
L(
I A
V C
E R
NO c, T I
n tA R L
t t
cn L E R A u i r
ii l
,U W E V r
t o str g C.
E K O t
l p
l e
3l I
C R E
s u p lft gA V E P T
i m u i oi C E l
A B
U f
lsc P
U n
s f
r l
R C o.
f ut T
I R
R n
s o fnn O
T o sd eg P
T na t
nmi lP A
r oo ots i
l a
il g ii e iS e
t i tmd h
at e am T
s ni w l ol
- iu ucl l
e bd f c e li d
mn l
ll p DN
- i. oo e al m O
S Cc S C ai C
"C E
TR HE 4 5 6
i 1
l 1 il 1
1 1
1 t
1 l t
A RU L
1 1
1 t
TN iT T
7 7 7 8 A
SP liar I !
/R t e tC et t
GC I
7 T
2 NE l
f l
o UC W
7 O
EA 2
D IE y
F Vtl r
2 2
W EA a
l g
E R
m U
c I
m P
V u
A E
S I:
H E
I' l
1
m
(
k TTAcsaarm 7
CbMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM
^
DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE ADDENDUM Procedure: DAP-4 Revision:
4 Addendum:
1
Title:
COMPLETION OF TYPE "C" CHECKLIST SUPPLEMENTS PURPOSE This addendum allows Type "C"
checklist supplements to include
.only those pages of a Type "C"
checklist containing attributes affected during the supplement process.
SCOPE Add to Section 5.4, paragraph 1,
after sentence 4 (p. 8), the following:
Alternatively, the supplement may consist of only those pages which contain attributes whose status is affected by the supplement preparation process.
In such cases, attributes on the affected checklist pages that are not changed by the supplement shall be marked "NC."
The checklist supplement shall be clearly identified on the checklist cover sheet including a listing of the affected pages.
INSTRUCTION This addendum is retroactive to September 12, 1986, and shall remain in effect until approval of the next revision of DAP-4.
This addendum shall be securely attached to each controlled copy of DAP-4.
Prepared By:
L J
Date:
- 2.
i
~v s
j Reviewed By:
.k Date:
f/77
%~
/ t
,f ( 7 Approved By:
Date:
1
,~ v f
TN-85-6262/14/DAPA CONTROLLED CJPY No. _
(,/
=,
h*TT A c.H MENT 7.-.
2 o e en TITLE PREPARATION OF CWCKLISTS NUMBER DAP-4 Revision P_repared Date Reviewed
. Dot e 4
Date
&pprovedtoMer hkd4 Mr %4 1%
o p.e a,
l 4N h/7)lg
- !#Y Gypa we 4 %<BG w<
G4 44 46 ShqQ %
3 gr/u
)
esk wk 2% u @
w
\\
4 CC FROLLED CDPi fK _ le L._ _.
TN-85-6262/4
\\
hTTACMM6AJ-f D
.3 o ff ' M TABLE OF CONTENTS
~ Section Pm C ov e r S h e e t......................................................
I T ab le o f C o n t e n t s.................................................
11 1.0 P URP O S E...................................................
I 2.0 SCOPE.....................................................
1 3.0 - DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.........................
I 4.0 I NS T R U CT I O N..............................................
2 S.O D O CU ME NT AT I ON..........................................
6 ATTACHMENTS A
DESIGN CRITERIA REVIEW CHECKLIST A-l B
DESIGN REVIEW
SUMMARY
CHECKLIST B-1 C
DESIGN REVIEW EV ALUATION...............................
C-1 D
A DDITION AL CHECKLIST CONSIDERATIONS..................
D-1 E
QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST CONSIDERATIONS.........
E-1 F
DIS CIP L INE /SUB JE CT CODE S................................
F-1 G
C HE C KL IS T L O G............................................
G-1 H
DESIGN REVIEW EVALUATION REVISI ON COVER SHEET....................................
H-l 4
TN-85-6262/4 li l
l
b WAC H M 6tV7 L
h o#
L1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROCEDURE
{
l Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure specifies the requirements for preparation of design document review checklists to be used in the performance of the CPSES Design Adequacy Progrom (DAP).
2.0 SCOPE This procedure opplies whenever o design document review checklist is required by a Discipline Specific Action Plon, o DAP procedure, or through a Discipline Instruction issued by the Review Team Leader, Design Adequacy Program Monoger, or Discipline Coordinator.
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Criterion A criterion is any statement of a performance, design feature, or design requirement which a system, structure, or component must meet in order to be copoble of performing its design function or to be in compliance with a project requirement or commitment.
3.1.2 Commitment A commitment is any statement mode by the project as part of the public record which identifies a system performance requirement, design feature, or design requirement which will be met by the project.
TN-85-6262/4 Page 1 of 8
$TT ACHM6 AM L
5 e r: 2n COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 l
3.1.3 Implementing Document implementing documents are design documents (such as calculations, evoluotions, and analyses) that translate design criteria into design output documents.
3.1.4 Output Document Output documents are design documents (such as drawings and specifications) that define technical requirements of systems, structures, and components.
3.2 Responsibilities
-3.2.1 Checklist Developer Checklists shall be developed by personnel assigned by the Discipline Coordino-for. The Discipline Coordinator may otso be o checklist developer.
3.2.2 Discipline Coordinator The Discipline Coordinator shall assign personnel to develop checklists. He sho!!
define the purpose and scope of each checklist. This definition may be in the 1
form of verbal direction to checklist developers.
i 4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 Evoluotion Desion Criterio and Review Topics Checklists will be prepared to ensure o consistent and complete review of design criterio for the various review topic areas. Design Criterio Review Checklists lk shall be prepared using the format of Attochment A for each design discipline TN-85-6262/4 Page 2 of B i
n
h T T A cu M E u-r 1
Goctz COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE I
Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 review topic arco to verify that the review topic criterio are complete, i
consistent, and adequately defined. Design Review Summary Checklists shall lh also be prepared using the format of Attochment B to summarize the verifico-tion of the implementation of the review topic criteria. Where appropriate, the Discipline Coordinator may allow more than one review arco to be evolvated on a single checklist (Attachment A or B).
The Discipline Coordinator may authorize offernatives to the format of Attachments A and B; however, the alternative format shall contain comparable information. The Discipline Coordi-notor shall molntain a log of checklists used in the format of Attachment G to this procedure. This log meets the requirements of DAP 11 and shall be filed in occordance with DAP 14.
4.2 Preparation of Checklists Unless otherwise directed by the Discipline Coordinator, Design Criterio and Design Review Summary Checklists shall be prepored in occordance with the lh format of Attachments A and B for the various review topics. The Discipline Coordinator shall assign one or more individuals to the preparation and comple-tion of the checklists. The Discipline Coordinator may develop ch. eklists.
Design Review Evoluotion Checklist forms are prepared as appropriate using the format of Attachments C-1 and C-2.
Attochment C-2 is the format for continuation pages. As used herein, Attachment C refers to both C-1 and C-2.
Alternate formats may be used provided they contain comparable information.
The criterio/ commitments (from the list developed in occordance with DAP-1) opplicable to the scope of the checklist form are reviewed and selected for g
-inclusion on the checklist. The checklist preparer may select fewer than 100 percent of the opplicable criteria for inclusion in the Design Review Evoluotion form (s) provided that the bases for such selection are documented in the Design Review Summary Checklist (Attochment B) form or in another appropriately referenced document.
Where o criterion / commitment listed in the criterio/ commitments list is itself a source of detailed criteria that is not TN-85-6262/4 Page 3 of 8
A t T~A cu M G. NJ-7 'L
~~7 oG *L]
COMANCHE PE AK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 expanded upon in the Criterio List (DAP-1), the checklist should use the detailed criterio extracted from that source. The selected criterio/ commitments (includ-ing more detailed criterio obtained from the source document) are entered in the
" Attributes Reviewed" column of Attachment C.
The " Description of Verification" column of Attochment C shall be completed to describe the method by which implementation of the criterion will be verified (e.g., line-by-line check of a calculation, comparison of selected calculation poges against selected drawings, etc.). If necessary, this column may be cross-referenced to on ottochment that contains more information on the verification
~
methodolgy. If the criterion entered in the " Attributes Reviewed" column does not represent odequate acceptance criterio for the review then the " Description of Verification" column should also be used to provide necessary acceptance critero detail.
Specific documents to be reviewed are selected in occordance with DAP-21.
Where appropriate, development of the Design Review Evoluotion form and the selection of specific documents may proceed in parallel if necessary to ensure the odequocy of the checklist form. In addition, the person preparing the Design Review Evoluotion form should also give consideration to the following factors:
Whether similar document types exist such that a combi-o notion of document types is needed to reach a conclusion about the odequacy of o portion of the design process (e.g., there may be eight types of mechonical calculations and selecting one of each type, os required above, may provide on odecuote test of the calculation process such that no significant benefit is gained from testing multiple examples within each type)
Wheiher the criterio that could be verified by odditional o
exemples of the document type con also be verified by other document types or through o*ber means (e.g., by comparison with pre-operational test results).
TN-85-6262/4 Page 4 of 8
O OF 23 COMANCHE PE AK RESPONSE TE AM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 4.3 Additional Checklist items in oddition to the specific checklist attributes extracted from the criterio/
lk commitments list, the checklist developer shall consider the items in Attach-
)
ments D and E and shall incorporate them into the checklist as determined to be appropriate by the checklist developer and the Discipline Coordinator.
In considering these items (which are defined in ANSI N45.2.11-1974, Section 6.3.1),
the developer and Discipline Coordinator shall take into consideration that not o!! items are opplicable to each document type, that other aspects of the review may odequately address these topics, and that the wording of the item may need to be clorified for use in the checklist.
l 4.4 Approval of Checklists Formats Eoch Discipline Coordinator shall opprove all checklist forms developed for his discipline. This opproval requirement applies to Design Review Evoluotion forms ld (whether in the format of Attochment C or in on alternative format), to checklist forms that are used as alternatives to Attachments A and B (Discipline Coordinator opproval of Attachments A and B is not required), and to any other checklists developed for his discipline. The opproval of the Discipline Coordino-tor to use o checklist form shall be in the form of a memo to appropriate personnel authorizing them to use the forms noted in the memo. Supplemental attributes added to o checklist form in occordance with Section 4.5 below shall not require Discipline Coordinator opproval prior to completion of the checklist.
4.5 Use of Checklist Other DAP procedures and discipline instructions govern the use of checklist forms developed in accordonce with this procedure. Prior to using any checklist form to conduct a review in occordonce with a procedure governing its use, the person intending to use the checklist form shall assure himself or herself that the TN-85-6262/4 Page 5 of 8 k
oF 71 COMANCHE PE AK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 checklist form is adequate for its intended purpose. In particular, the user shall consider whether any item on Attachments D and E should be odded to the checklist form. Furthermore, the reviewer may odd any additional attributes that he or she feels is necessary to ensure the odequacy of a design review evoluotion form (Attachment C or equivalent). Such odditional attributes or other checklist form supplements may be odded without prior Discipline Coordinator opproval. Discipline Coordinator opproval is ochieved when the completed checklist is approved.
5.0 DOCUMENTATION 5.1 Identification Of Checklist Forms Design review evoluotion checklist forms (i.e., checklist forms similar to the format of Attachment C that contain the review attributes, but which have not been used for o review) shall be given a checklist form number, revision number, and date. The checklist form number shall be placed in the lower right hand corner of each page of the form if Attachment C is used; otherwise the checklist form number may be placed where it is deemed appropriate by the Discipline Coordinator. The initial version of each form is designoted "Rev. 0".
The format of the checklist identification shall be:
DAP Form No. XX-YYY, Rev. N, ZZ/ZZ/ZZ o
o o
o Date Revision Number Sequent 101 Number Discipline / Subject Code (See Attachment F)
TN-85-6262/4 Page 6 of 8
\\O o t=
'L~1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE t
Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 This numbering requirement for checklist forms is retroactive and shall be applied to oil checklist forms. The Discipline Coordinator shall maintain o log of checklist forms (See Attochment G).
S.2 R_evision of Checklist Forms lh The Discipline Coordinator may direct that checklist forms be revised at anytime. Unless specifically directed by the Discipline Coordinator, the revision of a checklist form shall not invalidate any checklist completed using a previous revision of a checklist form. The appropriate revision number and date shall be entered onto the forms. The sections of the form offected by the revision shall be marked with a vertical line and revision number in either the left or right hand margin of the form. Supplemental attributes entered into o checklist by a reviewer in accordance with Section 4.S of this procedure shall not be considered revisions to the checklist form.
5.3 Checklist identification After opproval of a completed checklist has been obtained in occordance with the DAP governing its use, the checklist shall be assigned a control identification number by the Discipline Coordinator. The identification number shall be of the following format:
DAP-CLZ-M YYY (Supplement No.
), Rev.
3 o o a
See Section 5.4 Sequential Number Discipline / Subject Code (See Attochment F) g Checklist Type Code A = Design Criterio Review Checklist (Attochment A)
B = Design Review Summary Checklist (Attochment B)
C = Design Review Evoluotion (Attachment C) 1 TN-85-6262/4 Pe 7 of A
hTTACHMGWT 2.-
\\\\
of 1.3 COMANCHE PE AK RESPONSE TE AM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-4
Title:
PREPARATION OF CHECKLISTS Revision: 4 The Discipline Coordinator shall enter all checklists used in the discipline for which he is responsible in o Checklist Log (Attechment G).
5.4 Revisions and Supplements to Completed Checklists Supplements to completed checklists shall be used to document any changes in findings based on the review of odditional information including the review of later revisions to the documents being evoluoted. Supplements shall use the some checklist forms originally used. They shall be completed in the some manner os the original checklists. However, only those attributes required to ochieve the objectives of the supplementary review shall be completed and oil others will be marked "NC".
Upon opprovo!, the checklist number assigned will be the some os the original checklist number with the additional indication of a supplement number. Supplement numbers will be assigned in sequential order beginning with I.
Supplements shall be entered in the Checklist Log as o separate line entry by the Discipline Coordinator.
Approved completed checklists ond/or supplements may be changed by means of a Revision to correct errors ossociated with DAP implementation of the checklists or to provide additiono! information required by DAP procedures.
Examples include the correction or oddition of criterio numbers, HDA numbers, DIR numbers, misspellings and/or omissions. Revisions shcIl not be used to change any findings of the original review or to modify the context of the original review to reflect the review of later revisions to the documents being evolvated. A revision package shall include all of the some material contained in the original checklist pockoge or supplement and shall be opproved using the Design Review Evoluotion Revision Cover Sheet (Attachment H). Revisions shall be initiated and checked by reviewers and opproved by the Discipline Coordinator. The Discipline Coordinator may also sign as either the initiator or the checker. For checklists completed prior to 9/15/86, cover sheets shall be applied to the checklists if a revision or supplement becomes applicable.
Previous "Rev. 0" checklists do not require a backfit. The original issue of completed checklists ond/or supplements shall be noted as Rev. O with sub-sequent revisions assigned in sequential order beginning with I.
TiL95-6262/4 Pooe 8 of 8
bTTACMM6W 7
\\t oc zn ATTACHMENT A COMANCFE PEAK DESIGt4 CRITERIA REVIEW CIECKLIST DSAP CHECKLIST NUMBER CRITERIA LIST NUMBER /REV Review Topic Number (s)/ Title (s)
List the Design Criterio Sources:
General Design Criterio FS AR Section(s)
Regulatory Guide (s)
List Criterio Which Are being Reviewed:
Criterio No.
TN-85-6262/4 A-1 Attochment A l
l l
$ "TT A c H M NT
'7 I3 o 7
'2 ~1 Are the Design Criteria for this Design Topic Complete?
If "no," deserlLe the missing design inputs.
Are the Identified Design Criterio for this Design Topic Consistent? _
If "no," describe the inconsistencies.
l Are the Design Criterio Adequately Defined to the Level of Detail Necessory to:
1.
Allow the design activity to be corried out in o correct manner? Yes No I
2.
Provide a basis for making design decisions and evoluoting design changes?
Yes,_
No 3.
Provide o basis for accomplishing design verificotton? Yes No if any of the above are onswered "no" describe the lock of detail g
l l
1 i
TN-85-6262/4 A-2 Attochment A i
I
$ WR C% H GM"Y L
\\ 4-o f zn Summarize Results of the Review.
Reviewer Date l
l Discipline Coordinator Date TN-85-6262/4 A-3 Attochment A
F, l
A *T T A c uMG. Art ' 1 15 or 2-7 ATTACHMENT B COMANCE PEAK l
I DESIGN REVIEW
SUMMARY
CECKLIST CHECKLIST NUMBER DSAP Review Topic Number (s)/ Title (s) 1 Documents Reviewed:
Document Nome Number Rev Date Sofety-Related i
Yes No Description of Review Scope and Purpose, i
TN-85-6262/4 B-1 Attachment B
S T T A C. M M G M~T L
I (o o F 2.1 List Design Criteria for this Review Assumptions Listed for Eoch Document?
Yes No Are the Assumptions Reasonable and Valid?
Yes No Are the Assumptions Consistent with Design Criterio/ implementing Documents?
Yes No Have oil Assumptions which Require Verificotton Been Verified?
Yes No Comments on Assumptions (Discuss Eoch "No" Answer Above)
TN-85-6262/4 B-2 l
Attochment B
h T T(A CH MGAM b M
or L'7 Are the References including Dato Sources (for the Documents Reviewed) Listed?
Yes No' Are References Sufficiently identified with Revision or Date?
Yes No Comments on
References:
(Discuss Eoch "No" Answer Above)
Were Changes from Specified Design Criterio identified, os well as the Reasons for the Change?
Was on Appropriate Design Method Used?
Explain:
TN-85-6262/4 B-3 Attochment B
Arwcucm t
\\ 6 or r1 List Computer Programs Used.
Verified Progtom Reference Yes/No Are the Computer Outputs Reasonable Compared to inputs?
Explain t
4 TN-85-6262/4 B-4 Attochment B
___--__m.__m_. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ ___
hWSC H M E rv T 7
\\R of t1 Summarize Results of the Review.
{
I b
Discrepancies identified (if applicable) (Reference DAPTS DlR Number)
List Attachments:
Reviewer Date l
Discipline Coordinator Date TN-85-6262/4 B-5 Attachment B
lliji D
Dn17 g
'Db 03 pJ.
s tne m
m
/
oC
.v l
e e
taA R
ta sN D
nU/
/C tN o
S
.veR
)
fon ne o 't l
o a
o i
N v
t o
pic t
r i
f i
n p
i N
e p
xre O
m A
no eV D
I e
i T
l t
lA p
p p
ir
- U.
u c
S s
4, e
(
D L
f f
r o
o.
MW l
I 2
HE
)
C t
e I
e m
C V g
e G
a AE h
e TR S
cP m
T n,
A N et r
rn o
G ee F
ee I
m f
S t t P
E aa e u D
DD Rc A
o D
D
(
R EB NUN TS ILKC E
I J
C
-e ive Rse s
t e
u s
c b
r n
i e
e r
t b
w 1
m 4
f A
/
u e
2 N
R 6
r 2
er o
y 6
we i
r ek r
a 5
ic e
m 8
ve t
i i
eh r
r N
RC C
P E!lj T
l D 4 OCIB
' f A
en
'l s
tne mn r
/
oC
/
v f
e aA s
R nN U/
/C tN a
S
.ve R
)
fono ni o;
o i
s N
pi t
i t
f i i n
N e
xre O
m cV I
e D
T l
A p
2U pu CL S
(
fo WW 2-HE
)e C
I C V t
g AE e
a e
e TR h
cP m
T S
n AN rn o
et r
G ee F
m I
f S
e u P
E Rc A
D o
D D
(
R EB NU N
TS ILKC
~
E IC kyeRse tu b
ir t
tA 4
/
2626-58
-N I:ll T
A rrAc m ost
'L L2 Of ATTACHMENT D ADDITIONAL CECKLIST CONSIDERATIONS 1.
Were-the inputs correctly selected and incorporated into design?
l 2.
Are assumptions necessary to perform the design activity odequately described and reasonoble? Where necessary, are the assumptions identified for subsequent re-verifications when the detailed design activities are completed?
~
3.
Are the appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements specified?
4.
Are the opplicable codes, stondords, and regulatory requirements, including issue and oddendo, properly identified and are their requirements for design met?
5.
Have opplicable construction and operating experience been considered?
- 6..
Have the design interface requirements been satisfied?
7.
Was on appropriate design method used?
8.
Is the output reasonable compared to inputs?
9.
Are the specified parts, equipment, and processes suitable for the required application?
10.
Are the specified materials compatible with eoch other and the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed?
I 1.
Have odequate maintenance features and requirements been specified?
12.
Are accessibility and other design provisions odequate for performance of needed maintenance and repair?
13.
Hos odequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be required during the plant life?
14.
Hos the design properly considered rodiation exposure to the public and plant personnel?
15.
Are the occeptance criterio incorporated in the design documents sufficient to allow verificotton that design requirements have been satisfactorily accomplished.
16.
Have odequate pre-operational and subsequent periodic test requirements been appropriately specified?
.TN-85-6262/4 D-l Attachment D l
hWAC.HM 6NT 1.
2. 3 o re 17 ATTACHMENT D (continued) 17.
Are odequote handling, storage, cleaning, and shipping requirements specified?
18.
Are odequate identification requirements specified?
19.
Are requirements for record preparation review, opprovel, retention, etc.,
odequately specified?
i l
TN-85-6262/4 D-2 Attochment D
S TTACHMGIVT E o.
2 +- oa 11 l
ATTACHMENT E QUALITY ASSURANCE CECKLIST CONSIDERATIONS Are design onelyses sufficiently detailed as to purpose method, o
assumptions, design input, references and units such that a person technically qualified in the subject con review and understond the analyses and verify the odequocy of the results without recourse to the originator?
o Was a design review performed and documented?
Was the extent of design verification or review commensurate with o
the importance of the design to safety, its complexity, degree of standardization, relation to the state-of-the-art, and similarity with the previously proven designs?
o Do appropriate design documents have review and approval signatures?
Were changes in designs (including field changes) Justified? Were o
they subjected to design control measures (such as review and opproval) commensurate with these opplied to the original design?
o Are the Design Criterio defined to the level of detail necessory:
1.
To allow the design activity to be corried out in o correct manner?
2.
To provide o busis for making design decisions and evoluoting design changes?
3.
To provide a basis for accomplishing design verification?
o Are assumptions listed?
o Are assumptions reasonable and valid?
o Are there assumptions which conflict with Design Criteria implementing Documents?
o Hove assumptions which require verification been verified?
TN-85-6262/4 E-l Attochment E i-l
$ ~TT AC.H H CN'T L 16OFN ATTACHMENT F COMANCrE PEAK DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM DISCIPLitE/SUBECT CODES Code Discipline C/S Civil / Structural P
Piping and Supports
"'M Mechanical EIC Electrical / Instrumentation PGl Programmatic / Generic Implications E
Electricol*
I Instrumentation *
- NOTE: Use of T" and "1" codes are optional alternatives to the TIC" code.
ElC may be used for both Electrical and I&C.
"E" may be used when the document is relevant only to the electrical discipline.
"1" may be used when the document is relevant only to Instrumentation and Control.
I TN-85-6262/4 F-1 Attochment F
ll D A1p EIn N
Q 6' o
e*
6 4
S
-PAD E
4 TA D
N 3
O I
S IVE 2
R MA I
RGOR O
P YCAU O
G G
E O
D L
T A
N T
E N
S I
M K
L H
S K
E C
E C
LT A
D E
I T
T K
G TA AEP E
ONAMMO D
.O N
.D I
LOR TNO C
4fy00D 9_
ll
b TTACVAMfm E 7 7 oF 17 l
i ATTACHMENT H i
DESIGN REVIEW EVALUATION REVISION COVER SHEET Checklist Number Supplement No.
. Rev.
Description of Revision:
b Initiated by:
Date:
Checked by:
Approved by:
TN-85-6262/4
P4
( @F 9 TITLE REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, EVALUATIONS Ato OTWR IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS NUMBER DAP-5 Revision Prepared Date Reviewed Date Approved Date 0
W f
} (
w pm
@/y /4 % $4
%/g
/
,/u/c d
i y%x sju Q4 % @}4 %
y u &
w sw v /n
\\
- .OI? ibLlbObIsfY idt hI TN-85-6262/5 i
h"TT'AC M M CA.rT 3
(d 2 Of TABLE OF CONTENTS Seetion Pooe Co ve r S he e t......................................................
I T ob le o f Con t e n t s.................................................
11 1.0 P URP OS E...................................................
I 2.0 SCOPE.....................................................
I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.........................
I 4.0 I NS TR U CT I O N..............................................
3 b
5.0 DO CU ME NT A TI ON..........................................
7 TN-85-6262/5 11
pp gg 3
P4 3 of 9 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure defines the methods for the review of calculations, evoluotions, and other implementing documents.
2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to Review of implementing Design Documents such as calculations and evoluotions used in the design of the systems oddressed by the Design Adequocy Program Implementing documents will be reviewed against the appropriate design criteria. Calculations and evoluotions will be reviewed for the odequocy of the applied methodology as well as occuracy of the implementation of the methodology.
This procedure does not address the review of output documents (drawings and specifications). The review of output documents is addressed in DAP-6.
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Implementing Documents The documents which provide for implementation of the design criterio such as
- Flow Diagrams and Instrument Control Diagrams.
1 3.1.2 Criterion A criterion is any statement of a performance, design feature, or design j
requirement which a system, structure, or component must meet in order to be TN-85-6262/5 Page I of 7 i
[
___-___________i
MN Q
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE c
Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS capable of performing its design function or to be in compliance with a project requirement or commitment.
3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Discipline Coordinator The Discipline Coordinator is responsible for selecting the type and number of Implementing documents, calculations, and evoluotions in each area to be reviewed. The Discipline Coordinator is responsible for assigning Reviewers.
3.2.2 Reviewer The Reviewer is responsible for completing reviews of assigned review topics in occordance with this procedure, using appropriate checklists, ensuring that the check is occurate, and and checking that work done under his (or her) direction is Correct.
3.2.3 Assigned Personnel Assigned personnel perform verification activities under the direction of the Reviewer.
3.2.4 Checker Checkers are responsible for verifying the occuracy of the Reviewers or Assigned Personnel's work.
TN-85-6262/5 Page 2 of 7
A T rser u u dLa n 3
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE cg q Number:
DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS 4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 Identification of Reviewer i
For each review topic listed in the description of the DAP self-initiated i
evoluotion contained in the CPRT Program Plon, the appropriate Discipline Coordinator shall select on individual who shall function as the Reviewer for that topic and shall be responsible for the completion of the checklists ossociated with that topic (i.e., the Design Review Summary and Design Review Evoluition described in.DAP 4 as Attachments B ond C respectively or alternative checklists developed in occordance with DAP 4). The identified Reviewer shall meet the qualification requirements of DAP-IS. The Discipline Coordinator may oct os the Reviewer, provided that he meets the qualification requirements of DAP-15. Assigned personnel working under the direction of a Reviewer shall have been trained in this procedure and shall have received any technical trotning deemed appropriate by the Reviewer, but need not meet the qualifico-tion requirements opplicable to the Reviewer. If the Reviewer determines that such technical training is necessary, the requirement of the trotning, its scope, and its completion shall be documented.
4.2 Customization of Checklist Forms and Identification of Specific Documents For Review The Reviewer shall review the Design Review Evoluotion checklist forms applicable to the review topic that have been released for use by the Discipline Coordinator. The Reviewer shall determine whether the forms require supple-mentation or other modification as provided for in DAP-4 (including the supplementary review items contained in Attachments D and E of DAP-4). He may make whatever changes he deems appropriate to customize the checklist form for o particular review topic.
TN-85-6262/5 Page 3 of 7
SMG4M6 aft )
COfdANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEGUACY PROCEDURE gy Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 i
EVALUATIONS AND OTHER
)
IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS I
For self-initiated review areas, documents shall be selected for review in occordance with DAP 21. Those specific items identified to be reviewed, shall be the latest revision of the opplicable documents. If the opplicable document revision has on opproval date prior to April I,1985, it shall be used for review.
Otherwise, the latest revision with on opproval dote prior to April I,1985 and oil b
the following revisions shall be used os described in Section 4.4.
For overview of corrective action programs, the documents shall be the latest revision of the opplicable document selected in occordonce with DAP-20.
The Reviewer or Assigned Personnel under the direction of the Reviewer, shall enter the appropriate references for the selected documents in the " Reference" 4
column of the checklist. The reference shall be sufficiently complete to allow another person to identify the specific portion of the document being reviewed.
For example, the identification number and renewol pages of the calculation, os well as the co!culation page revision number and date, should be used. The reference information may be entered into the checklist form in the course of the review.
I 4.3 Completion of Checklist l
Each review of implementing documents shall be conducted by using the checklists developed in occordance with DAP-4 as customized in occordonce with Section 4.2.
The purpose of the review shall be to determine whether.
Indivldual design documents appropriately comply with the opplicable design ld criterio. The Reviewer or Assigned Personnel shall examine all items on the checklist and indicate whether each item was found to be satisfactory, unsatis-factory, not checked, or not applicable. "Not Checked" or "NC" may be used when a standard checklist form is used to perform o limited review of a given subject such that on applicable area was excluded from the review scope. "Not TN-85-6262/5 Page 4 of 7
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEGUACY PROCEDURE Q] gg Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS Applicable" or "NA" may be used when on item on a standard checklist form is not opplicable to the subject being reviewed. Where the appropriate use of "NA" or "NC" would not be apparent to o qualified reviewer, the use of "NA" or "NC" on the checklist should be accompanied by on explanation in the " Comments" d
column or os on ottochment to the checklist which provides the basis for use of "N A" or "NC".
Although not required, it is recommended that a reference be provided to the checklist (s) where the items marked "NC" are reviewed. The Reviewer or Assigned Personnel shall also indicate the basis for determining the verification conclusion (e.g., visual inspection of document, field wolkdown, calculation review, and independent calculation) and the acceptance criterio (e.g., agreement with alternate calculations within X%, ogreement between documents X ond Y, etc.) if not otherwise included in the checklist form.
For self-initiated review arcos, completed checklists shall indicate the homo-geneous design activity (HDA) number associated with each checklist item (ottribute). This con be accomplished by indicating the HDA number in the
" Comments" column or on on of tochment that clearly estabilshes the correlation.
This is not required for checklists used for overview of corrective action d
programs.
The " Comments" column may also be used for any other comments about on attribute, its implementation, or its verification.
l 4.4 Current Document Revisions After March 31,1985 This section only applies to self-initiated review scopes.
ld As noted above, special review considerations are opplicable to documents for which the current revision of the document is dated later than March 31,1985.
TN-85-6262/5 Page 5 of 7
h TTAC HM6 AJT h
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE f
Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS In such cases the following steps shall be completed by the Reviewer or Assigned Personnel:
The lost revision prior to April I,1985, shall be obtained.
o All revisions between the revision obtained in the previous o
step and the current revision shall be identified and obtained.
The Reviewer or Assigned Personnel shall determine the o
differences among the revisions and the causes for those revisions.
A review shall be conducted using the current revision of o
the document and the appropriate design review evoluo-tion checklist completed, Appropriate design review evoluotion checklists shall be o
completed to document the review ogainst the review attributes of those aspects of the revision of the docu-ments that were changed in the latest revision.
The
~
" Sot /Unsot/NA/NC" column shall be marked as appro-priate, items that are "Unsot" in the previous revisions shall be processed in accordance with 4.5 (below) in spite of any correction that may have been mode in the current revision.
4.S Processing Unsatisfactory items items found to be unsatisfactory shall be noted on the checklist and shall also be separately compiled and processed in occordance with the procedures outlined in DAP-2. The DIR number assigned to each unsatisfactory item shall be listed in the " Comments" column, or os on ottochment to the completed checklist with suitable traceability to each unsatisfactory item.
4.6
_ Approval If the et.eklist is completed by Assigned Personnel, the " Comments" column TN-85-6262/5 Page 6 of 7
g 3
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE pg C,gq Number: DAP-5
Title:
REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, Revision: 3 EVALUATIONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS shall be annotated with the nome or initials of the person who performed the verification.
The Reviewer shall ossure himself of the adequocy of the completed checklist and sign the " Reviewer" space.
After a checklist is completed and signed by the Reviewer, the Discipline Coordinator shall designate o Checker.
The Checker shall verify the occuracy of the checklist by reviewing at least 10 percent of the checklist items or a minimum of 5 Items. After all comments or questions are resolved with the Reviewer, the Checker shall sign the checklist in the " Checker" space and return it to the Discipline Coordinator. The checklist shall be approved by the Discipline Coordinator, who shall sign the " Approved By" line of the checklist sheet.
If the Discipline Coordinator is also the Reviewer he shall sign both spaces.
5.0 DOCUMENTATION Upon approval, checklist identification numbers are assigned in accordance with Section 5.3 of DAP-4. Eoch completed checklist shall be forwarded to the DAP Monoger for filing in accordonce with DAP-14.
TN-85-6262/5 Page 7 of 7
r e
u 00CKETED UStlHC DEC 8 P1 '35 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f0 hfygg[* -
NG BRANCH before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-445-OL
)
50-446-OL TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING
)
COMPANY et al.
)
~
)
(Application for an (Comanche Peak Steam Electric
)
Operating License)
Station, Units 1.and 2)
)
)
i CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Peter B.
Bloch, Esq.
Assistant Director for f
Chairman Inspection Programs 1
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comanche Peak Project Division Commission U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Washington,-D.C.
20555 Commission H
P.O. Box 1029 Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq.
Granbury, Texas 76048 Chairman j
Atomic Safety and Licensing Juanita Ellis Appeal Panel President, Case U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory 1426 South Polk Street Commission Dallas, Texas 75224
. Washington, D.C.
20555 William H.
Burchette, Esq.
B.
Paul Cotter, Jr., Esq.
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert,.&
Chairman Rothwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Suite 700 Board Panel 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W.
U. S '. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20007 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Joseph Gallo, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln & Beale Mr. William L.
Clements 1150 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Docketing & Service Branch Suite 1100 J
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20036 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 e
_ ~ - - _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
,o Billie Pirner Garde Janier E. Moore, Esq.
Government Accountability Office of the General Project Counsel Midwest Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 104 E. Wisconsin Avenue - B Commission l
Appleton, Wisconsin 54911-4897 Washington, D.C.
20555 Renea Hicks, Esq.
Anthony Roisman, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General 1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
Environmental Project Division Suite 600'
[
Capitol Station Washington, D.C.
20005 l
P.O.
Box 12548 l
Sinkin L.
Christic Institute Robert A.
Jablon, Esq.
1324 North Capitol Street Spiegel & McDiarmid Washington, D.C.
20002 1350 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20005-4798 Nancy Williams CYGNA Energy Services, Inc.
Elizabeth B. Johnson 2121 N. California Boulevard Oak Ridge National Suite 390 Laboratory Walnut Creek, California 94596 P.O.
Box X, Building 3500 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 David R.
Pigott, Esq.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Dr. Walter H. Jordan 600 Montgomery Street c/o Carib Terrace Motel San Francisco, California 94111 522 N.
Ocean Boulevard Pompano Beach, Florida 33062 Robert A. Wooldridge, Esq.
Worsham, Forsythe, Sampels &
Robert D.
Martin Wooldridge Regional Administrator, 2001 Bryan Tower l
Region IV Suite 3200 U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Dallas, Texas 75201 Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive W.
G.
Counsil Suite 1000 Executive Vice President Arlington, Texas 76011 Texas Utilities Electric -
Generating Division Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom 400 N. Olive, L.B.
81 Administrative Judge Dallas, Texas 75201 1107 West Knapp Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 g) f
./
/
F
/h' f.
Thomas A.
Sch'mutz
/
f Dated:
December 28, 1987 i
i
- - - -