ML20238B680

Intervenor Exhibit I-SC-88,consisting of 870304 Drill Rept for 861202 & 10 for Local Emergency Response Organization

ML20238B680
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	05/12/1987
From:	Markovich R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Crocker D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
OL-5-I-SC-088, OL-5-I-SC-88, NUDOCS 8709010346
Download: ML20238B680 (55)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:4 - g 3 N - d r.5 $ M d. 65/g7 March'4, 1987 1-SC-78 14pT D.M. Crocker '87 NIG 25 A7 :57 Drill Report for December 2 and December 10, 1985 fgLERO' wv 3 Backaround As part of the ' quarterly Emergency Preparedness drill program,' drills were conducted on Decen'ber 2 and December 10, 1986 to practice the response of the Local Energency Response Organization (LERO) to a simulated uergency at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (SNPS)..The purpose of the drills was to exercise LERO's ability to implement the Offsite Radiological Emergency Response. Plan Implementing Procedures (OPIP's) to, improve their ability to respond to an' emergency, make appropriate recommendations to the public and implement those recommendations. All sections of LERO participated in the drills with the exception of the LERO Relocation Center and the Evacuee Reception Centers. The facilities which did participate i.icluded the Local Emergency Operations Center (EOC), the Emergency Worker Decontamination l Facility (ENDF), Patchogue Staging Area (PSA), Port JeffersorvStaging l area (PJSA), Riverhead Staging Area (RSA), Family Tracking and the Emergency News Centar (ENC). Only 1/2 of the field personnel were exercised during each of the two drills. All field workers performed their normal emergency duties with the exception of a few bus drivers who l were involved in a make-up session to familiarize them with bus yards and transfer points. Emergency Preparedness Drill Scenario 8A Revisior. I was used for the December 2 drill r.nd Scenario 7A Revision 1 for '.he December 10 drill. Shift 1 participated in both drills. They were last drilled in the February 13, 1986 exercise. The purpose of drilling Shift 1 on two consecutive weeks was to allow the participants to use the first week as a learning process to become familiar with the 1 test procedures and the second week to reinforce their knowledge gained during the first drill. All LERO members were pre-staged, i.e. told to rep 9rt to their work l locations at preassigned time, rather than exerc Me the normal 1. notification and call-out procedures. This prov;ded the. opportunity to brief LERO personnel on procedure changes and rc'nforce earlier training on OPIP revisions. Revision 8'to the Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan and Procedures was in effect at the time of the drills. All persons were drilled to that revision. m .- a \\

• 1 9709010346 070512 n

PDR ADOCK 05000322 C PDR. f ( g

i Scenario Obiectives The followin objectives. g is a summary of how well LERO performed the scenario The LERO objectives were the same for both scenarios and are ~ listed in Attachment 1. EOC Obiective 1 l December 2 & December 10: Initial and follow-up communi::ations were accurately and timely received. RECS messages from the TSC and EOF were telecopied fo the EOC to prevent any misinformation. This objective was met for both drills. EOC Obiective 2 December 2: LERO EOC members were told to report at 0800. The EOC was fully staffed and operational at 0845. However, the facility was not declared activated until 0910 because the TSC/ EOF staff were not pre-staged and were thus, not available. The Manager informed the Lead Controller of this and it was deemed acceptable to him. Decembar 10: LERO EOC members were told to report at 0800 with the EOC being declared activated at 0848. EOC activation for both drills was adequate. This objective was met. During the February 13th exercise, LERO EOC members began arriving at 0707 with the EOC being declared activated at 0810. EOC Obiective 3 December 2: Rosters could not be found by the Lead Communicator. The Equipment Controller for the LOC claims the rosters were on the cart but must have been misplaced during set-up. This objective was not met. The critique emphasized the importance of these rosters. December 10: Rosters were available to the Lead Communicator and he verified the ability to maintain 24 hour staffing. This fulfilled the objective. EOC Obiective 4 December 2 & December 10: No shortage of space, equipment or supplies was observed _~ ; during these drills. This objective vas met. 159(q 3og movaes 88'ul!M 340 11ro-Qlf a,ge,p,3 JJiD 3,We3 ~ 0313ff 35 ^ 7 JouaAJapr j ~ 03 A1333 g-p,,ggg / f hJf1N3Ci ggg - 19r%; vv] u pc, tv3p 7 j,,q, ,,g g '*u v3 sepwo 3 g w_ y,, p,,,, 20ltsl o op Ag0171.1318 Nr313 fig

EOC Obiective 5 December 2 & December 10: As stated in the objective, the RECS communicationsbetween the state and county were simulated. In addition, communications with FEMA, EBS station, local schools, hospitals and ambulance companies were simulated. For December 10, communications with the radiological monitoring teams were also simulated (this was not practiced en December 2). All other communications were practiced and found satisfactory. On December 2, the EOC had minor difficulty receiving data from the EOF via the dedicated line due to background noise by personnel in the room. However, this did not hinder any response to the scenario and did not recur during the December 10 drill. This objective was adequately met. EOC Obiettive 6 December 2: Security was unable to locate their box of procedures for 20 minutes during the drill due to it being misplaced during set-up. However, Security was familiar enough with the procedures to do.without them. They also obtained pertinent procedures from the Manager and Director. Therefore, their inability to locate their own procedures for 10 minutes did not hinder their performance. Finally, Security did not maintain a log-in/ log-out policy during the course of the drill. This should be done per procedure to maintain accountability in the EOC. The need to maintain accountability with the log-in/ log-out procedure was stressed in the Critique and a form will be provided to Security in a later ~ revision of the OPIPs to assist them in this matter. This objective was partially met. December 10: No problems were observed during the drill. This objective was met. EOC Obieci: M December 2: Six staff meetings were held during the course of the drill which is adequate. All messages were properly loggad by the Lead Communicator; however, some persons (approximately 201, estimated by the EOC Lead Controller) wrote messages on a scrap sheet of paper rather than standard LERO message forms. Status boards were observed to be kept up-to-date and communications were l observed to be transmitted accurately. Proper use of message forms was discussed in the critique. _ _ _ _ -

Status updates from the EOC contained conflicting information. For exaniple, at 1215 an EOC message was sent to the Riverhead Staging Area instructing field personnel to don their protective clothing and injest KI. At 1307, a status update was sent to Riverhead indicating no change in status with no recommendation to don protective clothing or injest KI. This problem was l addressed and corrected for the December 10 drill. This objective was partially met. l December 10: Five staff meetings.were held during the course of the i drill which is fewer than December 2 but.is.still adequate. Two general status updates were made by the Lead Coordinators. All messages were properly logged by. the Lead Communicator. The information contained in the communicatices relative to the brush fire on the Long Island Expressway changed. l as-the message was transmitted through the LERO Organization. The message stated that a brush fire was-causing a complete blockage of the east and westbound lanes of the Long Island Expressway and also the north I and southbound lanes of Patchogue-Mt. Siani Road. 1 (Refer to LERO Message Nos. 14 and 14A). The Lead Controller at the EOC decided to initiate. the message at the ENC rather than at the EOC as the message dictates. In the transmittal of the information from LERO ENC personnel to the EOC, the information on which roads were blocked was left out. This information was given to the Traffic Group at 0934. The Traffic Group attempted to determine which roads.were blocked by-seeking information from the Patchogue Staging Area. The-Public Information Group was prompted by the Public Information Controller to re-contact the ENC for the road blockages. This complete information was given to l the Traffic Group at 0942. However, the Traffic Group I continued its efforts to verify the road blockages. Ultimately, at 1025, through information provided by the Patchogue Staging Area (Patchogue Traffic Controller simulating a Route Spotter per the scenario) the information was that only the westbcund lanes of the .l Long Island Expressway were blocked. 'However, the EOC began investigating re-routing, if. necessary, and the fire's effects on the evacuation time estimates at 1008. The importance of obtaining all information was discussed with the Public Information staff. In l addition, the necessity of verifying reliable information (i.e. radio broadcast) was discussed at the i critique. ! I

p. In an announcement to the EOC, the phrase "10-mile keyhole" was used to describe the area to pre-stage y buses which led to some confusion by the Transportation Group. However, this did not slow their response since these players are well versed in determining zones based i on wind direction. Still, the exact zone letters should I be used and was mentioned in the critique. The Emergency Planning. Group developed a new method to improve the speed and accuracy in which status upda'ces are transmitted to the Staging Areas. This new method was tested by LERO members in this drill. Instead of being given to the Encuation Support Communicators for transmission to the Staging Areas, the Lead Communicator, with help from the Administrative Support Staff, telephoned status updates directly. In addition, the Manager reviewed and approved all messages prior to their transmittal to ensure accuracy. This process worked well. This change will be reflected in a later revision to the procedures. This objective was partially met. EOC Obiective B December 2: The Director of Local Response was in control throughout the drill and decisions were handled in a proper and expeditious manner. Tnis, objective was met. i December 10: The Director of Local Response was in control throughout the drill; however, the PAR dNision took from 1220 to 1250. The Director was trying to obtain information from the EOF relative to the declaration of the Genefal Emergency and the rationale for their protective action recommendations. The EOF recommended evacuation of zones A-J at 1225. The RHC and the Nuclear Engineer tried to obtain data from the EOF to maKe their independent assessment of the potential for containment failure. Since the persons in the EOF were in a meeting at the time, the RHC and the Nuclear Engineer were l content to wait. At 1250, the Lead Controller prompted the Director to call for an evacuation of the affected zones so as not to impact the remainder of the scenario. This objective was not adequately fulfilled. In the critique, the RHC and the Nuclear Engineer were informed that they weren't forceful enough in trying to obtain the data and they should have informed the Director so that he might try to obtain the information from another source. l s-j

EOC Obiective 9 December 2: The Alert was declared at 0842. The Director decided to recommend early school dismissal at 0908. Sirens were activated at 0913 and an EBS message with early dismissal of schools was sent at 0914. The Public and Private School Coordinators obtained a copy of the EBS message and contacted simulated schools. December 10: The Alert was declared at 0808. The' Director decided on an early dismissal of schools and sent an EBS message at 0828. Sirens were activated at 0834 and EBS message with early dismissal of schools sent at 0833-0836. The Public'and Private School Coordinators obtained a copy of the EBS Message and contacted simulated. schools. Response at both drills' was adequate; this objective was met. IQC Obiective 10 l December 2: EBS Message 1 - Alert declared at 0842. Director decides on PARS at 0908. Sirens sounded at 0913 (simulated). EBS aired at 0914 (simulated). EBS Message 2 - Site Area Emergency declared at 1010. Director decides on PARS at 1027. Sirens sounded at 1030 (simulated). EBS aired at 1031 (simulated). I The section referring to placing animals on stored feed i was deleted'and a follow-up message had to be issued. This item was discussed at the December 9 critique with the Lead Controllers and the problem did not recur at the Dacember 10 drill. EBS Message 3 - General Emer'gency declared at 1132. 1 Director ducides on PARS at 1149. 1 Sirens sounded at 1154 (simulated). EBS aired at 1155 (simulated). EBS Message 4 - This is a Traffic Impediment message and doesn't fall into the 15 minute criteria. Refer to EOC Objective 11 for further information. EBS Message 5 - This is a Traffic Impediment message and doesn't fall into the 15 minute criteria. Refer to EOC Objective 11 for 4 further information..

December 10: EBS Message 1 - Alert declared a't 0808. Director decides on PARS at 0828. Sirens sounded-at 0834 (simulated). EBS aired at 0833-0836 (simulated). EBS Message 2 - Site Area Emergency declared at 0953. Director decides on PARS at approx. 0955. Sirens Sounded at 1002 (simulated). EBS aired at 1003-1006 (simulated). l EBS Message 3 - General Emergency declared at 1202. Director decides on PARS at 1205. i Sirens sounded at 1219 (simulated). I EBS aired at 1218 (simulated). EBS Message 4 - Director decides on PARS at 1248. l Siren sounded at 1255 (simulated). l EBS aired at 1257-1302 (simulated). i EBS Message 5 - This is a Traffic Impediment message and doesn't fall into the 15 minute l criteria. Refer to EOC Objective 11 for further informatica. EBS Message 6 - Director decides on PARS at 1355. Sirens sounded at 1407 (simulated). EBS aired at 1408-1415 (simulated). EBS Message 7 - This is a Traffic Impediment message and doesn't fall into the 15 minute criteria. Refer to EOC Objective 11 for further information. All EBS Messages with protective actions met the objectives for both drills. l EOC Obiective 11 December 2: The Traffic Group expeditiously handled two evacuation free play impediment messages that were introduced per the scenario in the field. Specifically, the first impediment, a gravel truck and three passenger cars was introduced at 1315 from a Road Crew on location. The message was recorded accurately and completely by the Evacuation Support Communicator and by 1320 the Evacuation Coordinator and the rest of the Traffic Group were informed of the impediment. Immediately the Traffic Engineer started evaluating the problem under direction of the Evacuation Coordinator and additional Road Crews were dispatched to the scene. By 1328 the i

Manager, Coordinator of Public Information and Transportation Support Coordinator were informed. At l 1334 the Road. Crew informed the EOC that removal of the l impediment would take more than two hours. Previously at 1328, the Traffic Group followed procedures and had obtained approvals on the proposed re-routing and had contacted TCP 10 by radio (as per procedures). A total t l of 13 minutes elapsed from notification of the- ' impediment and the implementation of re-routing. The Director decided to issue EBS Message No. 4 with traffic impediment information at 1330 and the EBS message was broadcast at 1341 (simulated). The sirens were sounded at 1340 (simulated). By 1337 the Manager briefed the l ECC on the impediment and stated that an EBS message was being broadcast to alert motorists of the situation. By 1349 an approved bus re-routing scheme was developed by the Traffic Engineer and the Transportation Support Coordinator. The Evacuation Support Communicator transmitted this information at 1402. Special Population Coordinators, whose functions may have been impeded by the accident, were informed at 1358. This exhibited very good control and coordination by the Evacuation Coordinator and all other functional groups. At 1404 Route Spotter 1005 called in a fuel truck impediment. i*he Evacuation Support Communicator quickly and accurately transcribed the message and gave it to the Traffic Control Coordinator immediately. By 1410 the entire Traffic Group was informed. By 1412 the i Traffic Engineer started working on re-routing because the Evacuation Coordinator realized it would be difficult to remove a leaking fuel truck. After following all procedures, at 1425 re-routing information was given to the Lead Traffic Guides at the Staging Areas. A total of 21 minutes elapsed from.the impediment notification to transmission of re-routing instructions. The Traffic Control Point Coordinator was informed by the Traffic Controller that response may have been faster if the Traffic Control Points were radioed from the EOC with re-routing instructions as was done in the first impediment.. Also, at 1425 the Mt. Siani Fire Department was called (simulated) and was asked to respond as was the owner of the fuel truck. Bus re-routing was completed by ~the Traffic Engineer by 1450 and was transmitted to the Bus Dispatcher by 1455. EBS Message No. 5 describing re-routing was approved by the Director at 1418, broadcast (simulated) at 1437 and sirens were sounded (simulated) at 1436.

f Response to the road impediments was organized and efficient due to good communication between and within the Traffic Group and other groups and upper EOC management. This objective was met.for both impediments. .The EBS Messages for these Traffic Impediments contained specific re-routing information. Contents of EBS Message issued for Traffic Impediments was discussed in the December 9 critique with the Lead Controllers. The Emergency Preparedness Group is in the. process of developing general guidelines of what should be' included. in these messages. There are no Federal requirements. In the December 10 drill, the EBS Messages for Traffic Impediments were improved over those for previous drills. December 10: Four impediments were introduced per the scenario. The first impediment, a brush fire, was designed to test only the EOC's response to an impediment that blocked a major artery (LIE) and might possibly affect the evacuation time estimates.. No field workers.were dispatched and.the fire was extinguished before the evacuation per the scenario. The second impediment was removable and its intent was to pre-occupy the EOC while an evacuation was in progress and when the third and fourth immovable impediment were introduced. The third and fourth impediments were designed to test LER0's re-routing abilities. Brush Fire Imoediment - LIE & CR 83 The,EOC was informed of the fire by the ENC at 0930. The Public Affairs group gave the message to the Traffic Group and the Evacuation Coordinator.was informed as of i 0942. By 0954 the Evacuation Coordinator instructed the I Evacuation Route Coordinator to get a Route Spotter out l to check out the fire. The Traffic Engineer started - working on potential re-routing, should it be necessary. At 0955 the Site Area Emergency was declared. The Route Spotter responded as of 1025 (Controller via radio at Patchogue, no personnel actually were dispatched to the fire per the scenario). The Traffic Engineer discussed the impact on the evacuation time estimates (roughly double) with the Radiation Health Coordinator and discussions took place on the possible effect on PARS. After questioned by the Traffic Controller, they indicated that this may sway a PAR toward sheltering if conditions degraded further. The objective of this impediment was adequately fulfilled by EOC members. Further details on problems with communications on the brush fire are included in EOC Objective 7. -g-1

Quck Truck Immediment -T, tis was introduced at the ENC at 1200. An EOC Public Information staff member gave the message to the Evacuation Coordinator at 1223. This delay was because' the ENC Controller had transmitted the message incorrectly indicating the EOC was already aware of the ir cident. The Public Information Controller corrected the response. At 1226 a Route Sp~ otter was dispatched to report on the accident.. Note that this was. prior to an evacuation order. Previously the Traffic Control Co)rdinator and the Evacuation Route Coordinator had de:ided to dispatch the Evacuation Route Spotters be.:ause sume were already at the Staging Areas. This wa:1 done without consulting with the Evacuation Coordinator. By 1249 the Route Spotter reported the extent of the accident (T = 23 min.). By 1252 the Evt.cuation Coordinator wanted a tow truck sent to the scene even though there was not an evacuation yet. =By l 13!:3 this Road Crew reported to the scene (T = 61 min. l (Ncte that evacuation order came at 1254). By 1400 the duck truck had been cleared. The reasons for the delay was discussed with the Traffic Group at the drill critique. CAgent Mixer Immediment This was introduced at the desk of the Evacuation Sup3 ort Communicator at 1303. By 1314 the Evacuation Coo.dinator ordered the Road Logistics Coordinator to send out two Road Crews while the Traffic Engineer developed alternatives. Re-routing was presented at 1317 and was approved. At 1327 the Traffic Control l Coordinator relayed modifications to the Riverhead Lead Trai'fic Guides because the Traffic Control Points were not yet manned. The appropriate Traffic Control' Points were contacted by the Staging Area at 1331. Very good response by the Traffic Engineer-(T = 14 min.). Bus i re-routing was developed in 13 minutes (1330). The l total time for the entire rssponse was 28 minutes. This I time was very good. EBS Message No. 5 with this traffic information was approved at 1330 and was broadcast between 1334-1339 (simulated). Sirens were sounded at' i 1333 (simulated). l 1 m l I l

i_._. g}p ool Truck Imoediment This was introduced at 1400 to an Evacuation Support Communicator. Information was correctly disseminated and by 1412 the Traffic Engineer developed a re-routing l scheme (T - 12 min., very good response). After approval was made, the Traffic Control Point Coordinator transmitted re-routing information directly to Traffic Control Points 63 and 64-via radio at 1417. Total response time was T - 17 min. (good response. time). Bus operations were not affected by this impediment. EBS Message No. 7 with this traffic information was approved at 1432 and broadcast at 1437 (simulated). Sirens were sounded at 1436 (simulated). This objective was partially met with the exception of the Duck Truck accident. As stated previously, the reasons for the delayed response was discussed at the drill critique. EQC General Comments December 2: The procedure for the periodic estimation of total population exposure was not demonstrated. However, the procedure allows for this estimation to be completed after the initial crisis is over and, due to the compact nature of the scenario, time would not permit this to occur. For the pre-staging of buses, the Manager and Evacuation Coordinator wanted to wait until all of the required Bus Drivers were at the Staging Areas. In fact by procedure, the order to pre-stage should be issued regardless of the number of drivers available and the Staging Area should assume the responsibility for dispatching the Bus Drivers at the proper time. This was discussed at a critique held on December 9,1986 with the Lead Coordinators. At the EHDF, two of the twelve RM-14s (#5253 and #5230) used during the drill were nearly discharged at the start of the drill. The Decontamination Leader directed the monitoring personnel to check battery levels every 15 minutes and change any that were below the acceptable level in anticipation of this problem. This was excellent guidance on the part of the Decontamination Leader. This equipment maintenance problem was brought to the attention of the Emergency Preparedness Group and has been resolved. The Record Keepers at the ENDF were confused on the correct serial numbers to use for the TLD's. LERIO is in the process of highlighting the serial numbers to avoid this confusion in the future..

[. ' December 10: Again, estimation of total population exposure was not performed; however, it was considered. The procedure was not demonstrated because the drill was terminated prior to its. implementation. The practice of this procedure will be emphasized.in future drills. At the ENDF, a field worker simulated to be contaminated walked approximately 20. feet in a clean area before being stopped by an ENDF person. This was discussed at the drill critique. One problem was encountered with Family Tracking which concerned the EOC at Brentwood. The people receiving the calls in Brentwood were not returning the: confirmations of delivery of.the message to Family Tracking, they.were returning them to the original I caller instead. Procedures call for them to call back to Family Tracking when the message has been delivered to the.LERO worker. Family Tracking would then call the original caller to confirm that the LERO worker had been i reached. This item will be stressed at future training i sessions and drills. The Special Facilities group and the Ambulance Coordinator did a very good job in performing their duties. The Home Coordinator however did not get a listing of the Reception Hospitals prior to calling the ' homebound when the evacuation of additional zones P and i S were called for. This was discussed at the' critique and will be stressed in future training sessions and drills. A message was received from the ' field that an individual had received 4 Rem and was requesting authorization for additional exposure. The location of this. individual was outside the radioactive plume and his reported exposure was never questioned. In addition the Director authorized exposure up to 10 Rem and the RHC was not consulted. This is a direct violation of the procedure and was discussed at the critique, i The RHC assumed that no release was in progress at 1245, yet the Assistant RHC had information which was obtained 10 minutes earlier that field readings indicated _25-30 mr/hr near the site boundary. This was due to contradictory data being given to the Assistant RHC by-the Lead Controller.. The. data supplied by the Controller was lower then the data supplied by the EOF. i This was a problem with the scenario hnd not a problem I with the players. i

Staaina Areas Obiective-1 l December-2 & December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchoaue and Riverhaad Emergency notifications were received in a timely manner. This objective was met. Stacina Areas Obiective 2 t December 2: Port Jefferson i LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at 0800. The Port Jefferson Staging Area was declared activated at 0845. The Staging Area was ready at 0830, but they i delayed stating that the Staging Area was activated until the EOC was ready to receive messages at 0845. Patchoaue LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at 0800. The Patchegue Staging Area was declared activated at 0830. Riverhead LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at 0800. l The Riverhead Staging Area was declared activated at 0815. These times were adequate; this objective was met for all Staging Areas. ] December 10: , Port Jeffer un LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at 0800. l The Patchogue Staging Area was declared activated at. l 0820. l 1 Patchocue LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at 0800. The Patchogue Staging Area was declared activated at 0822. Riverhead LERO Group 1 and 2 members were told to report at' 0800. The Riverhead Staging Area was declared activated at 0825. These times were adequate; this objective was met for all Staging Areas.. -. I.

e $1gina Areas Obiective 3 i December 2& December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchoaue and Riverhead Rosters were available to the Staging Area Coordinators to fulfill this objective. Staaina Areas Obiective 4 December 2: Port Jefferson Sufficient space, parking, equipment and supplies were availab,'e to activate and support the Staging Area activities. One minor problem with equipment was that not enNgh magnetic-type antennas were available. Three Traffic Guides had to use the clip-type antennas and attach these to.their windows since their cars did not have raingutters. This 'did not prevent the Traffic Guides from performing their duties, however, the Emergency Preparedness Group is' addressing the concern. Patchoaue and Riverhead Sufficient space, parking, equipment and supplies were available to activate and support the Staging Area activities. December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchocue and Riverhead Sufficient space, parking, equipment and supplies were available to activate and support the staging area activities. The concern about antennus for Port Jefferson was not resolved for this drill and is being addressed by the Emergency Preparedne:: Gioup. This objective was met for both drills. Staaina Areas Obiective 5 December 2: Riverhead The radio at River. head used to communicate to the field was inoperable at 1125. The Riverhead Staging Area called for a radio repair technician and the radio was back in service at 1215. Due to the problems with the-Riverhead radio the Eastport Substation Transfer Point Coordinator phoned in to the Bus Dispatcher at.Riverhead informed him that both he and the Brookhaven Substation and could not radio Riverhead. He stated he would call in every 1/2 hour. As stated previously this problem was resolved at 1215. This did not affect field operations and demonstrated a resourceful approach to problems..

[. Port Jefferson and Patchoaue l All communication links with these Staging Areas and the LERO EOC and field personnel were established and operated adequately. This objective was met. December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchocue and Riverhead All communication links.with these staging areas and the LERO EOC and field personnel were established and operated adequately. This objective was met. l Staaina Areas Obiective 6 December 2 & December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchocue and Riverhead Security was adequately maintained at these Staging Areas. It should be noted that only 1/2 of the field personnel were instructed to report per drill. This caused some problems with staffing security however security was maintained with available personnel. This objective was met. Staaine Areas Obiective 7 December 2: Port Jefferson All messages were accurately transmitted and put on the proper message forms. Updating of the status boards were not consistently kept up-to-date. Three updates from the EOC were received but on one, only some of the changes were reflected on the status board. Upon prompting, the status boards were corrected. The updating of status boards was stressed in the drill critique. The PA system was regularly used to brief staging area personnel. Patchoaue The entire communication staff was well trained in all aspects of their responsibilities, however, some messages were not formally documented on a message form (i.e., Bus Dispatcher to radio operator to inform Transfer Points to begin evacuation at 1250 was done verbally). Use of message forms was discussed at the drill critique. Status boards were adequately kept up-to-date and briefings were held frequently. However, the Bus Driver briefings held by the Bus Dispatchers were not well organized. Bus Drivers came out of the briefings not knowing of their assignments or status of the emergency. This item was-thoroughly discussed in the drill critique. There was no such problem in this group's subsequent drill of December 10. The Staging Area Coordinator did not fill-out OPIP 4.1.4, Attachment 4 per his procedures and the Lead Coordinators did not document their' critical actions / decisions. This was discussed in the drill critique and did not recur in the December 10 drill. Riverhead Messages were transmitted and recorded in an accurate and timely manner and were properly logged.

However, status boards were not consistently maintained (i.e., at 1055 and 1115 the Staging Area received a status update-but did not update board).

In addition, status update announcements were lacking information and infrequent. This was discussed at the drill critique.-- December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchocue and Riverhead All three Staging Areas performed well in fulfilling this objective. However, stating and writing "THIS IS A DRILL" was sometimes omitted from communications. The use of this phrase was emphasized in the drill critique. Staaina Area Obiective 8 December 2& December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchoaue and Riverhead The Staging Area Coordinators demonstrated that they were in charge and control of the overall response assigned to their Staging Areas. This objective was met-for both drills. Stacina Area Obiectives 9. 10 and 11 December 2: Egrt Jefferson Transportation - Bus Dispatcher received message from EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1110 for Miller Place Shopping Center to pre-stage and 1210 for Norwood Avenue for evacuation of all zones. 'The Bus Drivers were dispatched by 1130 for Miller Place and at 1210 for Norwood Avenue. (Note: Norwood Avenue Bus Drivers were assigned and ready to be dispatched at 1200. So, as soon as the order came in, they were dispatched.)- All were at the Transfer Points in-time to support the evacuation. Pre-staged Transfer Points were contacted.at 1211 by the Staging Area and directed to begin dispatching of buses on their routes at 1300. This fulfills the requirements of the procedures. Curbside Pick-up was simulated for this drill and the controllers provided names of individuals to the Transfer Point Coordinators at Miller Place and Norwood Avenue. They were instructed to radio in these names between 1330 and 1430 (Refer to LERO Messages Nos. 34-38). The radioing of the names was performed at 1411 for Norwood Avenue and.1416 for Miller Place. Communication between the curbside Bus Drivers and Staging areas was established for curbside pickup and was adequate. .The Bus Dispatcher received message from EOC at 1509 to re-route buses due to fuel truck accident for Routes K5-6 and X4-5. At 1510, the Bus Dispatcher contacted the Norwood Avenue Transfer Point to inform him of the re-routing. No was informed that these routes were complete. This shows good communications. I 1.

Transfer Point Coordinators were dispatched to their points earlier (at 1015) prior to the dispatching order to support the Bus Driver Road Rally. (Refer to Staging Areas Objectives 13 and 14). Staging Area objective: 9 &nd-10 were met for the Transportation Group. Route Alert Drivers - Lead Traffic Guides received message of siren failures (Sirens #50 and #33) at 1025. The route for siren 50 was divided among 2 drivers; those drivers were dispatched at 1045. =The route for siren 33 was divided among 3 drivers; those drivars were dispatched at 1046. These routes were completed by 1330. A slight delay in dispatching was a-result of it taking 8 minutes to make copies of the' zone inaps for dividing up the routes. Note that no time frame for completing a route is required. I In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route I Alert Drivers for deaf notification at l 1208. Dispatching began at_1215 and was completed by 1225..This time is adequate. All Route Alert-Drivers phoned in upon completion of their routes te receive i direction from the Lead Traffic l Guides. This fulfills the requirements l of the procedures. Road Crews - Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Road Crews at 1208. Road Crews.were dispatched at 1217. This i time is adequate. Road Crew 2011 was informed of the fuel truck accident at 1430. He was not asked to respond to accident; informed that fuel company would handle. These objectives were met for the Road Crews. j i i

Evacuation L Route Spotte'rs - Lead Traffic. Guides received message to i dispatch. Route Spotters at 1208..All Route Spotters were dispatched by 1225. This time is adequate. Route Spotter 1005 radioed in the fuel l truck accident at 1405 (Refer to LERO I Message No. 42). The EOC contacted Route Spotter 1005 at 1414 to obtain further information and received it at 1415. The EOC contacted the Route Spotter at 1430 to provide dosimetry protection to Fire Department and 011' Company personnsi responding (simulated) to accident. The EOC again contacted Route Spotter 1005 for update on accident at 1512. As evidenced above, communications were established with Route Spotters and the EOC was able to provide directives. These objectives were met for the Route Spotters. Traffic Guides - The General Emergency declared at 1132. PAR of Evacuation of Zones A-S decided at 1149. Traffic Guide posts to be manned sent to Port Jefferson at 1206 and received at 1208. Preassigned Traffic Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation (6) was dispatched at 1222. Remaining Traffic Guides were dispatched by 1247. The six preassigned Traffic Guides for a 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their posts as follows: (Note that although 6 Traffic Guides are needed only 5 TCPS are required to be preassigned. 2 Traffic Guides report to TCP #5). TCP #4 1244 1 Traffic Guide L TCP #86 1243 1 Traffic Guide i TCP #6 1258 1 Traffic Guide TCP #5 1257 2 Traffic Guides - TCP #38 1246 1 Traffic Guide i 1 e 1 f .1 - , j ;g W

e This'tiSe frame is less than adoquate because only 3 of. the 5 Traffic Control Points were manned within 1-hour of the time the EBS Message.was aired (1155). The inadequacy was not serious however, because the two remaining Traffic Control. Points were manned within 63 minutes. Objective 11 was partially met for Port Jefferson. Only 3 TCPs out of th? 38 activated for this drill were unable.to communicate with the Staging Area. These were TCPs 74, 113 and 50. Two of these radios t (2100 used by TCP 74.and 1056 used by. TCP 113) were used on December 10 and were operating well. Radio 2111 (used l by TCP 50) was brought'to the attention I of the Emergency Planning Group and the j problem will be. resolved by the next i drills. J During re-routing for the fuel truck impediment (at 1502-1510) TCP 56 could not'be reached.via-radio by either the EOC, Port Jefferson Staging-Area, or by TCP 55. These Traffic Guides were needed to implement the re-routing pi r.n. Initial communication between the Port' Jefferson' Staging Area and TCP 56 was established at 1255 and TCP 56 radioed in at 1313 upen arrival at TCP. After interviewing a Traffic Guide at'TCP 56, he informed me that he tried to reach the Staging Area to verify his re-routing responsibilities but the frequency was being used by others..He eventually did get through to the Staging Area'at approximately 1320. At this time, he; was told to report to the ENDF; During the time l that TCP 56 was' unteachable by his l radio. the Lead Traffic Guide used good initiative by employing TCP 55 as an available means to contact TCP 56 directly..TCP 56,wes aware of his responsibilities and would have assisted in the re-routing scheme (if. time permitted) to ensure adequate l l

71 evacuation flow. 'TCP 55 was' contacted and given the appropriate instructions l for re-routing.- The performance of j these-instructions by the. Traffic l Guides at TCP 55, however, were not l observed as time did not allow for.the. [ performance. Communications were established and maintained throughout the drill and the Staging Area and EOC were abin to issue directives for re-routing. 0bjectives 9 and 10 were met by the Traffic Guides. One of the 7 TCPs that the Port Jefferson Field Controller visited was c not manned. This was TCP #40 and was visited by the Controller at 1335. TCP

1. 40 did not arrive until 1351.

This-was because the Traffic Guide assigned to TCP #40 was last to receive, dosimetry and briefing.- The lateness of dispatch for this and four other TCPs were discussed during the critique to emphasize to the Lead Traffic Guide the importance of making-sure these posts are manned in a timely manner. These problems did not recur in the-December 10 drill. Ettchoaus-Transportation - Staging Area received message from EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1055 for pre-stage of zones A-J and at 1207 for evacuation of all zones. By 1145 the-required General Population Bus Drivers were dispatched'for pre-stage and by 1225 for the additional zones. Special Population Bus Drivers were dispatched by 1110 for pre-stage. No ad.ditional Special Population Bus Drivers were i dispatched for additional zones since no Bus Drivers were available because only 1/2'of the required field members were participating per.the scenario. All General Population Bus Drivers were at the Transfer Points in time to' support the evacuation,and'all Sper.ial Popu?ation Bus. Drivers returned to the Staging Area:in time'to receive.their assignments, to support the evacuation. Special Population Bus Drivers were dispatched on their assignments.at.1245. L' < o

Pre-staged Transfer Points were contacted at 1237 and directed"to begin dispatching of buses on their routes at 1250..This fulfills the requirements of the procedures. Curbside Pick-up was simulated for.this drill and the controllers provided names of individuals to the Transfer Point Coordinators at Brookhaven L National Laboratory and Coram Plaza-Shopping Center (Refer to LERO Message Nos. 34-38). This was performed at 1320 for Brookhaven National Laboratory and at 1355 for Coram Plaza. I Communications were established for j curbside purposes and were adequate. 1 In addition, Special Population Bus Drivers assigned to Health Facilities notified the Health Facilities Coordinator upon completing.their assignment. Transfer Point Coordinators were, dispatched to their points at 1120 and i were at their Transfer Points by 1145. ) i These objectives 9 and 10 were met for 1 the Transportation Group. I Route Alert Drivers - Lead Traffic Guides received message of siren failures (Sirens #19 and #45) at 1018. Both Route Alert Drivers were dispatched at 1025. l In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route Alert Drivers for Deaf Notification at i 1212. Dispatching was completed by 1219. These time frames were adequatt. The Route Alert Drivers phoned in upon completion of.their routes to receive directions from the Lead Traffic Guides. Deaf Notification was completed by 1414 and notification because of siren failure was completed by 1400. No' time frame for completirg l l 4 ...-_..-.mi.

) a route is required. Lead Traffic I Guides will be encouraged to dispatch { multiple Route Alert Drivers, when they are available, to expedite the Route Alerting Process. Road Crews - Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Road Crews at 1155. Road Crews were dispatched at 1200'. This time is adequate. Communications were established with the Road Crews by the EOC. Road Crews from Patchog::e were not needed for this drill's Traffic Impediments. These objectives were met for_ the Road Crews. Evacuation Route Spotters - Lead Traffic Guides received a message to dispatch Route Spotters at 1158. Route Spotters were dispatched at 1205. This time is excellent. Communications were established with the Evacuation Route Spotters by the EOC. Route Spotters from Patchogue were not needed for this drill's Traffic Impediments. These objectives were met for the Evacuation Route Spotters. Traffic Guides - The General Emergency was declared at 1132. PARS of evacuation of zones A-S decided at 1149. Traffic Guide posts to be manned sent to Fttchogue at 1200. Preassigned Traffic Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation (18 of the 21 required) were dispatched by 1218. 18 Traffic Guides were used since only 1/2.of the field personnel were invited per the scenario. This 1 did not adversely F.ffect the drill. Remaining Traffic Guides were dispatched by 1218 also. l l ee

The 18 preassigned Traffic Guides for 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their posts (13 posts; some posts required more than one TG) between 1230 and 1258. (Note that the Traffic Guide for TCP 75 - one of the TCPs required for a 0-2 mile evacuation - was sent home because of illness. He was not replaced since no other Traffic Guides were available at the Staging Area and it was not necessary to call someone out). This time frame is less than adequata because 'some Traffic Control Posts were not manned within 1-hour cf the tire the EBS Message was aired (1155). The inadequacy was not serious however, because the posts were manned within'63 minutes, objective 11 was partially met for Patchogue. No' controller was sent to observe the times of arrivals for the Traffic-Guides since no Patchogue Traffic Guides were needed for this drill's Traffic Impediments per the scenario. Communications were established and maintained for the Traffic Guides. All Traffic Guides reported in by' radio of their arrival at their TCPs by 1258. These objectives were met by the Traffic Gaides. Riverhead Transportation - Staging Area received. message from EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1115 for pre-stage of zones A-J and at 1200 for evacuation of all zones. By 1119 all required Bus Drivers for pre-staging were dispatched and by 1235 for evacuattori of remaining zones. All Bus Drivers were at the Transfer Points in time to support the evacuation.. 9 _.-.__._.___m___ i-l

The pre-staged Transfer Points were not contacted per procedures to begin i dispatching of buses on their routes 1 I hour after General Public notified. As { a result of this, the Brookhaven Substation Transfer Point began dispatching Bus Drivers at 1200. The { critique stressed the need to follow I the procedure and wait I hour before l dispatching buses. This waiting { requirement stated in the procedures 4 will be stressed in future training sessions and drills. Note that proper notification of Transfer Points occurred in the December 10 drill. Curbside pick-up was simulated for this drill and the controllers provided names of individuals to the Transfer Point Coordinators at Shirley Hall-(Refer to LER0 Message Nos. 34-38). The curbside pick-ups were radioed in to the Staging Area. -This was successfully completed at 1350. The Bus Dispatcher received message l from EOC at 1400 to re-route Buses on routes H-1, I-1, and J-1. This information was not relayed to the l Brookhaven Substation. The importance of transmitting this information will be stressed in future Training Sessions and drills. Re-routing information was properly transmitted at the December 10 drill. 1 1 Transfer Point Coordinators were dispatched to their points prior to the dispatching order (at 1100) to support the Bus Driver Road Rally (Refer to Staging Area Objectives 13 and 14). 4 e. ____._____ ______ _ w

Route Alert Drivers - Lead Traffic Guides received message of siren failure (Sirens #60 and #89) at 1024. Two Route Alert Drivers were dispatched at 1040. In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Routt Alert Drivers for Deaf NotifRatix 0 1204. Dispatching was completed i 1230. These dispatching times were adequate. The Route Alert Drivers phoned in upon completion of their routes to receive direction from the Lead Traffic Guides. Deaf Notification was l completed by 1330 and siren failure notification was completed by 1130 for siren #89 and by 1210 for siren #60. No time frame for completing a route is i required. Lead Traffic Guides will be encouraged to dispatch multiple Route Alert Drivers when they are available, to expedite the Route Alerting Process. Road Crews - Lead Traffic Guides received' messages to dispatch Road Crews at 1158. Road' Crews were dispatched at 1205. This is a good time frame. Road Crew #2004 vent to his location with a Traffic Guide Radio rather then sith a Road Crew radio. A Traffic Guide was dispatched to location #2004 j with the proper radio at 1.230. This i showed good response by the Staging l Area. ) l Road Crew #2002 radioed in at 1315 to i l inform of Gravel Truck Accident. At i i 1320. EOC contacts Road Crews 2002, 2003 and 2001 to respond to accident. 1 Road Crew 2002 asks for heavy duty wrecker and indicates clearing of accident will take greater then 2 hours. At 1342, EOC contacts Road Crew l 2002 for status of impediment, Road Crew 2002 indicates no change and EOC t l i

e contacts again at 1355. At 1356, Road Crew 2002 informs EOC that the 3 cars are cleared but road still blocked by gravel truck. At 1435. EOC contacts Road Crew 2002 to ask if heavy wrecker arrived. Road Crew 2002 indicated he will contact when it does. Road Crew 2002 contacts EOC at 1503 to inform accident has been cleared. Communications and response by the Road Crew were good. Objectives were met. Evacuation Route Spotters - Lead Traffic Guides received message to a dispatch Route Spotters at 1155. All Route Spotters were dispatched by 1205. This time is excellent.' 3 Route Spotter 1007 contacts EOC to inform them of Traffic build-up on Route 25. EOC contacts Route Spotter 1007 at 1326 to proceed to the accident scene. Route Spotter arrives at accident at 1329. The EOC contacted Route Spotter 1007 at 1400 to travel South on Grumman Boulevard to inform residents of new Bus Pick-up location. The Route Spotter observed (1007) made i frequent contact with the EOC (approximately every 15 minutes). This is good use of the Route Spotters and l demonstrated good communications. Objectives were met for the Route l Spotters. T.raffic Guides - The General Emergency was declared at 1 113%. PARS of Evacuation of Zones A-S decided 9 59. Traffic Guida Pcsts to be man..<w.ent to Riverhead at 1155. Pre-assigned Traffic Guides l required for a 0-2 mile evaccation (32 of the 35 required) were dispatched by l 1222. Note that TCPs 39, 34, 36 and 115 required for a 0-2 mile evacuation were going to be manned however, due to the requirements of the scenario, the Traffic Guides were reassigned to other + 1 e k._

TCPs. (Refer to LERO Message No. 26R). Remaining Traffic Guides were also dispatched by 1222. The 32 Pre-assigned Traffic Guides rt. quired for a 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their posts (26 posts, excluding the four TCPs mentioned above. Also more than one Traffic Guide required at some posts) by 1310. This time frame is less than adequate because some Traffic Control Posts were not manned within 1-hour of the time the EBS Message was aired (1155). Objective 11 was partially met for Riverhead. All Traffic Guides were able to establish communication with the Staging Area and radioed in upon their arrival at their TCP. TCP 10 radioed in the Gravel Truck Accident to the Riverhead Staging Area at 1307. He was given re-routing instructions from the EOC at 1328. Procedures for re-routing were verbally demonstrated to the Riverhead Field Controller and were adequate. The Traffic Guides at TCPs 13 and 14 were contacted at 1430 to determine traffic flow at their posts since they were near the Gravel Truck Accident. The response to the Gravel Truck traffic impediment was good. Two of the 11 TCPs observed had no Traffic Guides present. TCP 73 radioed in at 1240 that he was at the post but was not there at 1435 and TCP 15 radioed in at 1235 that he was at his post but was not there at 1440. After interviewing the Controller and the Traffic Guides at those posts, it was determined that the Traffic Guides were there parked at a location where the Field Contro11er'could not see them (i.e., Traffic Guide for TCP 73 was parked in a driveway). These objectives were met by the Traffic Guides. - - - _-_

It should be pointed out % hat later on in the drill, the EOC decided to extend the evacuation to include zones P and S. Since only 1/2 of the field personnel were invited to this drill per the scenario, no additional personnel were available to respond to this extension. The responses to this extension were therefore simulated. . December 10: Port Jefferson Transportation - Staging Area received a messa'ge from i. EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1025 for [ pre-staging of zones A-J, K, L. M, N, l 0, R and at 125B to evacuate the above l zones. By 1115 all required Bus Drivers for pre-staging were dispatched. No additional Ls Drivers were required to be dispatched for evacuation purposes. All Bus Drivers were at the Transfer Points in time to support the evacuation. 1 The Pre-staged Transfer Points were contacted at 1300 to inform when to begin the evacuation. This is adequate per procedures. Curbside pick-up was simulated for this drill and the controllers provided names of individuals to the Transfer Point Coordinators at Miller Place and Norwood Avenues (Refer to LERO Messages 42-46). Miller Place radioed in their curbside pick-ups at 1400 for Van F1, 1430 for Van F2 and 1450 for Van F3. This was imfnediately transmitted to the Bus Coordinator at the EOC at 1410, 1440 and 1450 respectively and given to the Home Coordinator. Norwood Avenue radioed in their Curbside pick-ups at 1315 for Van F4, Bus G and Vati Q were not radioed in. This information for Van F4 was immediately transmitted to the Bus Coordinator at the EOC at 1320 and given to the Home Coordinator. Although Norwood Avenue did not radio in for Bus G and Van Q, this portion of the drill was simulated. The purpose of this portion was to check the communication links which were adequate. Re-routing for buses was not necessary. _

Transfer Point Coordinators were dispatched to their points prior to the dispatching order (at 0940 and 0943) to support the Bus Driver Road Rally (Refer to Staging Area Objectives 13 and 14). Objectives 9 and 10 were met by the Port Jefferson Transportation Group. Route Alert Driver - Lead Traffic Guides received message of Siren Failures (Sirens #9 and #29) at 1 0938. Six Route Alert Drivers were dispatched on these two routes (routes divided among the Drivers) at 1003. In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received a message to dispatch Route Alert Drivers for Deaf Notification at 1305. Dispatching was completed by 1330. The Route Alert Drivers phoned in upon completion of their routes to receive directioi. from the Lead Traffic Guides. Deaf notification was completed at 1420 for zone K and 1500 for zone F. Siren failure notification was completed at 1210 for siren #9 and 1350 for siren #29. No time frame for completing a route is required. At 1245, the EOC notified the Staging Area to have the Route Alert Drivers re-notify the public for Siren Failures

1. 9 and #29.

This was not performed due to a lack of field personnel (only 1/2 of the required field workers were invited per the scenario). Hhat would be done was discussed with the controller. These objectives were met. Road Crews - Staging Area received message to dispatch Road Crews 1250 for Road Crews 2009, 2011, 2012 and all tankers and 1255 for Road Crew 2010. All Road Crews were dispatched by 1325. This time frame is adequate. ___

Road Crea 2010 eas initially dispatched by the Staging Area at 1255 to the Duck Truck Accident. He was contacted at 1300 by the EOC and told to report to accident. Road Crew 2010 arrived at the accident at 1352 and reported to the EOC at 1400 that the accident had been cleared. This time is less than adequate. It should be noted that the EOC did not dispatch a Road Crew when first notified of accident (at 1245) 5 because at that time evacuation was not I the PAR. The EOC assumed that prior to an evacuation recommendation, County Police would handle this situation as part of their normal duties. Once the evacuation PAR was made at 1248, LERO responded to the accident by dispatching Road Crews at 1255. Communications were established. Objectives were partially met by the Road Crews. Reporting to an accident quickly, will be stressed in future training and drills. Evacuation Route Spotters - Lead Traffic Guides' received message to dispatch Route Spotter 1001 at 1030 and remaining Route Spotters at 1315. Route Spotter 1001 was dispatched at 1045 and the others were dispatched by 1348. These tim'es are adequate. EOC contacts Route Spotters 1001 at approximately 1230 to have him respond to Duck Truck acci' dent. Route Spotter arrives at scene at approximately 1245 and relays status of accident and requests a Road Crew. Continuous communication occurred between the EOC and Route Spotter 1001 until 1400 (when accident was cleared). Communications were good. Objectives were met for Route Spotters..

i Traffic Guides - Tho General Emergency vas declared at 1202.- PARS of evacuation of zones A-J, K, L, M, N, 0, R made-at 1248. Traffic Guide Posts to be manned sent to Port Jefferson at 1258. Pre-assigned Traffic Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation (6) were dispatched by 1314. Remaining Traffic Guides were dispatched by 1345. The six preassigned Traffic Guides required for the 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their 5 posts (TCP 5 requires 2 Traffic Guides) by 1346. This time frame is adequate as it falls within 1-hour of the time the EBS Message was aired (1257). Objective 11 was met for Port Jefferron. All Traffic Guides established communications with the Staging Area. All TCPs observed by the Port Jefferson Field Controller had Traffic Guides at their posts when visited. No re-routing was required for Port Jefferson Traffic Guides. 1 i Patchocue l Transportation - Sta~ging Area received message from EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1029 for Pre-stage of zones A-0, R and at 1257 to evacuate above zones. All Bus 1 Drivers (Special and General Population) were dispatched by 1100 for pre-staging. No additional Bus Drivers were required to be dispatched for i evacuation purposes. All Bus Drivers were at their Transfer Points in time to support the evacuation. Pre-staged Special Population Bus Drivers returned to the Staging Area by i 1120. They were dispatched on their assignments by 1300.-

s The pre-staged Transfer Points were contacted at 1300 to inform when to begin evacuation. This is adequate per procedures. Curbside Pickup was simulated for the drill. and the controllers provided names of individuals to the Transfer Point Coordinators at 3rookhaven National Laboratory and Coram Plaza Shopping Center.(Refer to LERO Hessage Nos. 42-46). The Grookhaven National Laboratory radioed in their-curbside pick-ups at 1440 for Bus B, C, D and at 1445 for Van E. 'Coram Plaza radioed in their Curbside Pick-ups at 1455. Patchogue Bus Dispatcher simulated this information being sent to the EOC due i l to it being near end of drill. The following through with information to the proper positions will be stressed and observed in future drills. Re-routing of Buses was not necessary for Patchogue. Trans,'er Point Coordinator were dispatched to the points by 1030 and declared their Transfer Points operational by 1105. These object.ives were met by the Transportation Group. Route Alert Drivers - Lead Traffic Guides received message of siren failures (Sirens #19 and #40) at 0940. Two Route Alert Drivers were dispatched on these two routes at 0950. I In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route Alert Drivers for Deaf Notification at 1313. Dispatching was completed by 1315. These dispatching times are excellent. ( l.

Route Alert Driv'ers phoned in upon completion of their routes to receive direction from the Lead Traffic Guides. Deaf Notification was completed by 1422. Siren failure notification was completed at 1118 for Siren #19 and 1130 for Siren #40. No time frame for completing a route is required. Lead Traffic Guides will be encouraged to dispatch multiple Route Alert Drivers, when they are available, to expedite the Route Alerting Process. At 1254, the EOC requested that Routes for Sirens #19 and #40 be re-run. Two other Route Alert Drivers were immediately dispatched (dispatch form indicates 1254). These routes were not completed by drill termination. Objectives 9 and 10 were met by the Patchogue Route Alert Drivers. Road Crews - Staging Aren received message to dispatch Road Crews at 1310. All Road Crows were dispatched by 1312. This time frame is excellent. Road Crew 2005 was contacted by the EOC at 1410 to report to the Cesspool Truck accident. They arrived at the accident at 1440 and reported per the scenario that accident would take over 3 hours to clear. They were instructed by the EOC to remain at the location. Communications were established with all Road Crews. Objectives 9 and 10 were met by the Road Crews. Evacuation Route Spotters - Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route Spotters at 1020 and were dispatched by 1025. This time was adequate. The EOC requested at 1305 that routes 1019 and 1011 were also to be patrolled. This was simulated by the Staging Area since no personnel were available (only 1/2 of the field workers were invited for this drill per the scenario). -

.]} No Route Spotters were requested to respond to the traffic impediments. Communications with the EOC was-maintained by the-Route Spotters.. j These objectives were, met for the Route Spotters. ] Traffic Guides - The General Emergency was declared at 1 1202.- PARS of evacuation of zones A-0, R made at 1250. The Traffic Guide. Posts to be manned sent to Patchogue at 1311.. Pre-assigned Traffic. Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation (21) were dispatched by 1325. Remaining Traffic Guides were dispatched'by 1325 also. The 21 pre-assigned Traffic - Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their. posts (13 posts, more than one Traffic Guide required at some posts) between 1324 and 1401 (TCP 77 did-not arrive until 1447).. Other than TCP 77, this time. 1 was adequate as they fall within 1-hour of the time the EBS Message was aired (1257). Objective-11 was partially met .for Patchogue. The importance of arriving in a timely manner will be stressed.'to the Traffic Guide ht TCP 77 at future training sessions and drills. In addition, TCP 126 did not radio in their time of arrival. The '1 importance of transmitting arrival ) times will be stressed in future drills l and training' sessions. l The field controller did not observe l the times of arrival of Traffic Guides due to the lateness of the evacuation l order and his requirements per the scenario, he observed TCP 64 only. The Traffic Guiiie at TCP 64 radioed in l the Cesspool Truck Accident to the l Staging Area at 1353. This information was relayed to the EOC at 14C0 l Re-routing information was transmitted l to TCPs 63 and 64 from the EOC at 4 1417..This' response time is adequate. t l 4 + m _______1_______________.____

q Communications were established and -l maintained for-all Traffic Guides and ') all transmitted their arrival at their TCPs by 1447, except for TCP 126 mentioned earlier. (1 TCP out of 23 TCPs manned). l These objectives were met by the Traffic Guides. Riverhead Transportation - Bus Dispatcher received message from EOC to dispatch Bus Drivers at 1040 for pre-stage of zones A-0. R and at 1257 for evacuation of the above zones. By 1116 all required Bus Drivers for j pre-staging were dispatched. No additional Bus Drivers were required to be dispatched for evacuation purposes. All Bus Drivers were at the Transfer Points in time to support the evacuation. The pre-staged Transfer Points were contacted at 1257 to-inform when to begin evacuation. This is adequate per-procedures. l Curbside pick-up was simula'ed for this c drill and the controllers provided names of individuals to'the Transfer Point Coordinator at Shirley Hall (Refer to LEFJO Message Nos. 42-46). The names were radioed in to the Staging Area at 1400. This information was promptly relayed to the EOC at-1415. This time frame is adequate. The Brookhaven Substation Transfer Foint Coordinator received a message 'from EOC at 1345 to re-route Bus Route J-1 due to the Cement Truck traffic impediment. This information was adequately relayed to the Bus. Drivers. This.is good communications and respense. _-

Transfer Point Coordinators were l-dispatched to their points prior to the - dispatching order (at 1030) to support the Bus Driver _ Road Rally (Refer to Staging Area Objectives 13 and 14). All Transfer Points.were operational by 1103.. These objectives were met by the Transportation Group. Route Alert Drivers - Staging Area received siren failure l message at 0937. Lead Traffic Guides received message of siren failure (Sirens #99 and #107) at 1011. Two-Route Alert Drivers were dispatched at 1018. The time delay between'the f i timeliness the Staging Area received the message and the time given to the Lead Traffic Guide is not adequate. The importance of the timeliness of-i distributing information will be stressed in future training sessions and drills. In addition, the Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route l Alert Drivers for Deaf notification at 1315 for zones E J, N and at 1400 for zones P and S. Route Alert Drivers were dispatched at 1326 for zones E, J, N and at 1415 for zones P and S. This time frame is' adequate. The Route Alert Drivers phoned in upon completion of their routes to receive direction from the Lead Traffic Guides. Deaf Notification was completed at 1440 for zone E and 1418 for zone J. Time did not permit for zones N. P and S to be completed. l

Siren failure notification was completed at 1050 for Siren #99 and 1130 for siren #107. In addition, the EOC requested at approximately 1259 l that the routes be run again for sirens

1. 99 and #107.

These new Route Alert Drivers were dispatched at 1258 and phoned in upon, completion of their routes at 1405 for siren #99 and 1406 for siren #107. No time frame for completing a route is required. Lead Traffic Guides will be encouraged to dispatch multiple Route Alert Drivers, when they are available, to expedite the Route Alerting Process. j All Route Alert Driver information was relayed to the Special Facility Evacuation Coordinator. j These objectives were met by the Route Alert Drivers. Road Crews - Staging Area received message to l dispatch Road Crews at 1309. All Road j Crews were dispatched by 1315. This 1 time frame is adequate. The EOC contacted Road Crew 2004 at 1342 and Road Crew 2003 at 1328 to 1 proceed to Cement Truck accident. Road i Crew 2004 arrived at accident at 1345. At 1350, Road Crew 2004 radioed in to the EOC that removal of impediment would take over 2 hours. He also requested another Road Crew. At 1405, Road Crew 2003 calls in to EOC, he had problems with his radio and went to I Road Crew 2002 and radioed in from there. He is instructed to proceed to accident. Road Crew 2003 arrives at accident at 1423 and radios in to EOC. At.1.400, the EOC contacts Road Crew 2001 to proceed to accident. At 1450, EOC contacts Road Crew 2004 to contact Road Crew 2001. At 1455, Road Crew 2004 contacts EOC to taform that he could not reach Road Crew 2001. l l

At 1500, EOC contacts Road Crew 2004 for status. Road Crew 2004 indicates clearing of accident will take another hour. Communications with Road Crews were established and adequately maintained with the EOC with the exception of Road Crews 2001 and 2003. However, Road Crew 2001 responded at 1339 to injest KI. The non-communication of Road Crews 2001 and 2003 was brought to the attention of the Emergency Preparedness group and will be observed in future drills. Evacuation Route Spotters - Lead Traffic Guides received message to dispatch Route Spotters at 1021 and were dispatched at 1025. This time frame is excellent. Route Spotter 1009 called in Cement Truck accident at 1305 to the EOC. Route Spotter 1007 contacted the EOC at 1357 to report on his traffic conditions. At 1404, Route Spotter 1009 contacts the EOC to inform of Road Crew 2004 arrival. Communications was maintained by the Route Spotters and EOC on a regular basis. These objectives were met. Traffic Guides - The General Emergency was declared at 1202. PARS of evacuation of zones A-0, R made at 1250. The Traffic Guide Posts to be manned sent to Riverhead at 1309. Pre-assigned Traffic Guides required for 0-2 mile evacuation (26 of the 36 required) were dispatched by 1327. Note that TCPs 3, 7, 128, 115, 127, 73, 108, 39, 36 and 62 required for a 022 mile evacuation were going to be manned, however, due to the requirements of the scenario, were re-assigned to other TCPs, (Refer to LERO Message No. 30R). Remaining l Traffic Guides were also dispatched by 1327. The 26 preassigned Traffic I 4

Guides required for a 0-2 mile evacuation arrived at their posts (20 Posts, excluding the 10 TCPs mentioned above. Also, more than one Traffic Guide required at some posts) by 1415. This time frame is less than adequate because some Traffic Control Posts were not manned within 1-hour of the time the EBS Message was aired (1257). Objective 11 was partially met for Riverhead. All Traffic Guides were able to establish communications with the Staging Area and radioed in upon their arrival at the TCP, with the exception of TCP 87. His radio is being checked by the Emergency Preparedness Group and will be observed in future drills. The two TCPs observed by the Field Controller had Traffic Guides at their posts when visited. TCPs 16, 15, 29 and 19 were contacted by the Staging Area on re-routing at 1331 due to the Cement Truck accident. The implementation of the re-routing was simulated by the Traffic Guide at TCP 16 and proved adequate. Objectives 9 and 10 were met by the Traffic Guides. Stacina Area Obiettive 12 December 2 & December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchocue and Riverhead Field Controllers observing various locations (i.e., Transfer Points, TCPs) reported field workers reading their dosimeters every 15 minutes and aware of their usage and limits. New LERO Badges were distributed to field workers containing pertinent radiological information. Field workers were briefed on the use of these badges and field workers were urged to refer to these badges when necessary. 1 All field workers were. notified when to injest KI and don protective clothing. This objective was adequately met. i 4 i

f . December 2:' Port Jefferson. l l A controller initiated LERO Message No. 46 at I approximately 1430 stating that TCPs 4, 5, 6 and 86 were i reporting 4 Rem readings. The EOC responded quickly ) reporting at 1437 to have these Traffic Guides proceed ) to the EHDF. No replacements were dispatched because it l was late in the scenario nor were higher doses authorized. The response time was adequate. December 10: Port Jefferson j A controller initiated LERO Message No. 40 at 1405 to the Bus Dispatcher simulating that personnel at the M111er' Place Transfer. Point were reporting 4 Rem j readings. The EOC responded quickly and by 1430 reported that the Director of Local Response has authorized readings _to 10 Rem..This response time is adequate.and proper procedures were followed. (Refer to EOC General Comments for December 10 on the EOCs response to this message). Patchocue O'ne road crew member of the two man crew for Road Crew 2005 was not observed to read his dosimeters every 15 d minutes. The importance of reading his dosimeters was i stressed at the location. Stacina Area Obiectives 13 and 14 ) l December 2 & December 10: Port Jefferson. Patchouue and Riverhead Hake-up sessions for Phase II of the Bus Driver Driving Instruction Training were held at both drills. These make-up sessions were Phare II of LILCO's response to a deficiency cited in the FEMA Post Exercise Assessment for the February 13, 1986 Exercise regarding Bus Drivers i who were unable to find their assigned locations. The purpose of these sessions was to familiarize LERO Bus Drivers with their appropriate Transfer Points and the new Bus Company yard - Suburbia Bus Corp. in Bohemia. In addition, Bus Drivers from the Riverhead Staging Area l were required to travel to Baumann and Sons Buses,.Inc. in Hesthampton. I ' .l

. As you may recall, Phase I of the Bus Driver Driving ~ Instruction Training required the Bus Drivers to travel to seventeen (17) Bus Company yards. Upon the-conclusion of Phase II, our response will be completed since LERO Bus Drivers will have visited all LER0-contracted Bus Company yards and their appropriate Transfer Points by following driving instructions similar to those to be used in an actua1' emergency. Refer to Section 4.4 of both scenarios for further details. For both drills, thirty-eight (38) Bus Drivers participated out of the 66 Bus Drivers scheduled resulting in a 58% attendance rate. The sessions were incorporated as part of the LERO drills scheduled for these days. The Bus Drivers involved in the make-up Road Rallies, instead'of. performing their normal LERO functions, were di.spatched to travel to all Transfer Points coinciding with their Staging Areas and to the Suburbia Bus Corporation in Bohemia. As mentioned above, Riverhead Bus Drivers additionally had to travel to the'Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc. in Westhampton. Only Riverhead Bus Drivers were required to travel to this yard since only five (5) buses are contracted.at this yard and vill most often be assigned to the Riverhead Staging Area in an emergency. 1 Upon arrival at their Staging Areas, Bus Drivers - signed-in and received their dosimetry. At their drill briefings, Bus Dispatchers briefed the Bus Drivers on the specifics of their assignments and assigned a drill deadline time of 1500 whereby all Bus Drivers were instructed to proceed to the ENDF to hand in their equipment, driving instructions and verification cover sheets. Make-up Bus Drivers were dispatched by the Transportation Controllers (one per car) from their Staging Area. Before leaving, the Bus Drivers received the Session's Driving Instructions II, the Session's Verification Cover Sheet II (inserted into the Driving Instruction Book), and a box lunch. 1 Transfer Point Coordinators were assigned to their Transfer Points to perform as controllers for the session. The Transfer Point Coordinators were briefed by the Bus Dispatchers of their responsibilities. Two other controllers were assigned to the two Bus Company yards.

Transfer Point Coordinators / Controllers set up at their Transfer Points as normal and the Bus Company controllers set up outside'the Bus Company yard at an area void of any complications. All placed orange cones i near their location. Upon arrival of the Bus Drivers, { l the controllers hole-punched, initialed and wrote the j i time of the Bus Driver's arrival on each Bus Driver's j Session Verification Cover Sheet II. Note that each controller had either a heart, diamond, club or spada-shaped hole-punch to avoid unauthorized marking of the cover sheet. After traveling to all of their assigned locations, Bus Drivers then traveled to the EHDF for monitoring and possible decontamination. Also at the EHDF, Bus Drivers handed-in their driving instructions and verification cover sheets. For the December 10 drill, one (1) Bus Driver from the Patchogue Staging Area failed to locate the Suburbia Bus Corp. in Bohemia and arrived at the EWDF with Suburbia not verified. In. addition, the Bus Controller at Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc. in Westhampton was not permitted to remain at the location since the yard is located on Suffolk County property. All Riverhead Bus Drivers participating in the.. December 10 make-up session will be credited for this location as all indicated ther traveled to the f location, but no controller was there. Refer to memorandum from Bruce P.M. Kobel, dated 12/11/86, I "Baumann Situation" for further details. These sessions were the last to be held and concludes i LILCO's initial response to the Bus Driver deficiency sited by FEMA. A final report summarizing this entire effert will be issued at a later date. For the bus drivers who had already completed Road Rally training, the final response to this deficiency was initiated for these drills. All Bus Drivers who previously participated in the Bus Driver Driving Instruction Training Sessions were involved in the Bus Driver Maintenance System as described below. LERIO instituted a maintenance system to ensure that Bus Drivers are assigned to different Eus Company yards and Transfer Points during these and future drills and are not assigned to the same locations each time. This maintenance system consisted of the four steps outlined below: 1. During pre-drill preparation, LERIO arranged for buses to be available at only a few of the Bus Company yards per drill. For these drills, Suburbia Bus Corp. in Middle Island, Baumann & Sons in Bohemia and Westhampton, and United Bus Corp. in Coram. The yards will be rotated for each subsequent drill to ensure that Bus Drivers have the opportunity to visit all the yards and will not be driving to the same yard each drill. 2. Bus Dispatchers were told not to call for volunteers for assignment to a specific Bus Company yard or Transfer Point. This eliminated the problem of Bus Drivers familiar with a certain location volunteering for assignment to that location. 3. A computer program is being developed to track the progress and validity of the Maintenance System. After each drill, LERIO collected the Eus/ Van Dispatching Forms (Attachment 7 of OPIP 3.6.4) which were initiated and hole-punched by controllers at the above Bus Company yards. This data will be input into a spreadsheet p.ogram. 4. This computer report will be reviewed periodically to ensure the effectiveness of the system and to allow for immediate resolution of any problems, should they occur. i 1 1 i - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ l

ENC Obiective 1 (LERO Oniv) l December 2: LER0 ENC members were told'to report at 0800 with all required staff present by 0845. Clerical assistance i normally supplied by the EOC was not provided per the drill requirements. December 10: LERO ENC members were told to report at 0800 with all required staff present by 0830. Clerical assistance normally supplied by the EOC was not provided per the drill requirements. ENC Obiective 2 (LERO Oniv) December 2 & December 10: The ENC would contact the EOC and the EOC would maintain staffing of the ENC through rosters. This was performed at both drills. This objective was met. 3 1 ENC Obiective 3 (LERO Oniv) l December 2: Six simulated media briefings were held and were adequate and timely. Presentations were understandable and clear. Maps and other visual aids were available. It should be noted that the briefing of 1155 was not actually held because of non-LERO related problems with the briefitig room and was merely stated.as being held. This objective was l met. I December 10: Four of the five simulated media briefings were held and were adequate and timely. One exception is the first briefing which was not held until 1000 while the Alert was declared at 0808. This delay was a result of LILCO l personnel (onsite) not arriving until later since they were .not pre-staged. LERO, however, was ready sooner. This objective was met. 1 l ENC Obiecthe 4 (LERO Oniv) December 2 & December 10: This function was adequately simulated as no other agencies i participated in these drills per the scenario. This i objective was met. i l ENC Obiective 5 (LERO Oniv) I December 2 & December 10: Rumor control was established and performed adequately for both drills. The response to questions was performed in a timely manner (average of 15 minutes). I j i ! i

ENC Obiective 6 (LERO Oniv) December 2 & December 10: For both drills, only, a' portion of the ENC was activated due to outside commitments of the Poliday Inn.

However, space was adequate for the area activated.. Because of~

this, the telecopier.was located in the hallway making the telecopying of information inconvenient. However..this did not hinder ENC operations. LERO News Release Paper ran out during the drills. This was brought to the attention of the Emergency Preparedness Staff and an adequate supply of this paper will be. available. ENC Obiective 7 (LERO Oniv) 4 ' l December 2 & December 10: This objective was not observed by the ENC LERO Controller. This is not a LERO concern but an onsite concern and will be removed-as a LERO objective for further drills. ENC Obiective 8 (LERO Oniv) . December 2 & j December 10: The ENC copying capabilities were adequate for both drills. No problems were observed. This objective was met. ENC Obiective 9 (LERO Oniv) December 2 & December 10: Two LERO Spokespersons were used for both drills. The reason was that one was being trained by the other for this position as this was the first drill for this LER01 Spokesperson. In light of this, the new LERO Spokesperson performed his job adequately and effectively. 9 0 l i m

( l g L.- Areas Reauirina Corrective Action (ARCA) NH sc q The following is a summary of LERO's response to the.ARCAs cited hjITEMAN J.cj! for the February 13,.1986 Exercise. Refer.to Part I of Attachment 1 of.. SNRC-1276 for details on the ARCAs.

j,

EOC-2 ..y December 2: Notification of FEMA was performed to a simulated' shone number by the Director. Refer to LERO Message No. 4=for the simulated phone number. December 10: Notification of FEMA vas performed to a simul' ted phone i a number by the Director. Refer to LERO Message 1No. 5 for. R the simulated phone number.

}J l

IQC-1 December 2: Notification of the LIRR was performed to a simulated phone 1 number for.this drill by the-Evacuation Coordinator. Refer 1J to LERO Message No. 4 for the simulated phone number. 1.X Jy December 10: Notification of the LIRR was performed.to a simulated phone- ? '. number for this drill by.the Evacuation Coordit)ator.' Refer to LERO Message No. 5 for the simulated. phone number.. ggg-g .i December 2 & December 10: Modifications were completed and reviewed with DOE prior to 4 t these drills. The new status boards were used in both s drills. (Refer to memorandum to LERO File from D. l Dreikorn, dated 1/9/87, "Heeting with DO,E" for Status Board l discussions). EOC-5 I 6 .q y j December 2 & December 10: The reporting of this data was not observed for these drills as DOE was not participating. -o ? .4 ....f ,j f. y' ( ( x .a.

1 1 EQfeE \\ December 2 & i" a~ December 10: The DOE did not participate in thnse drills thus no field', 1 data was extrapolated. During a meeting with the DOE l (Refer to memorandum from D. Dreikorn, dated 1/9/87, '\\ 3 " Meeting with DOE") this matter was discussed and it was agreed that any extrapolated field data by DOE RAP will be i ir.dicated as such when reporteo' to the EOC. Simulated { field data (actual).was ;iressrted tc> the RdC by the i controller and doses were projected basedion this data. '1 These projected doses were placed in if,e.ipprcpriate Columns. A i EQCc-1 \\ m o December 2 & 'l l t* Decembcr 10: No observation was made atIeither dril), regarding the (, t 1 misstating of PAG.s by the He61th Servicis CmAdinRJrt ~We j corrective actions taken last spring was effe #1v<;,\\ s 1 4 s 3 EOC-8 i ( Not-Applicable i; 7 s t } t December 2 & December 10: The expedited dispatching of fidid personnel to resoces to i traffic impediments was 'rdt part of these sce6arios! It will be practiced in f utqe scenarios. 1 1 \\ j EOC-10 i (, ( i. } t Not-Applicable f ) EOC-11 Throuch 15 j Not-Applicab'le. Neither School Bus Drivers nor Ambulance /Ambulette l Drivers participated in these drills. 3-i ,'t 3,{g_g s. Cacember 2 & December 10: Both the EPZ Map u'd ECl. Itatus Board were available at the ENC and were utilial.in Both drills. \\ '3 \\ a ,. \\. \\ s l t 1 li 'y, N - N i

• s; \\ );

'\\ ?\\ p \\ { 'I x* ,: s 1 \\ y l i l t 4

t,

i 1 l '\\> 'N Q) \\

F 1 r a u e D.C=1 December 2: 1 News Releases #1 and #2 were posted with minor cross-outs -j indicated on the releases. This was due to thescomputer not being in operation at.the beginning of the dril.l. :The remaining press releases'were properly issued'using the computer. l December 10: All press releases were issued by the: computer and did not contain any marks which,could add to confusion, Port Jeffersond December 2 & s December 10: New LERO hadges.containing radiological and dosimetry 's information wera given to field personnel for both drills.- Field memt.ers were instructed on the use of these. badges. ,s s Field members cbierved by controllers were aware of thef t 1 s 4 T dosimetry'and radiological requirements. l fjitchoaue-2 Y.rpugh 5 l ,t l Ddtember 2 & ~ q

tyeember10:

The new security procedure was implemented for these. drills i. l i ,.I and secur*ty was observed to be adequate. .r 1 EAtch0.g!J1-l? q l 2 P Dedstsr 2 & [ December 10: The new LERO badges issued to field workers contain job' i specific information as well as the radiological and l L l-dosimetry information mentioned earlier. The Traffic Guide ] F7 badges. state that the Traffic Guide should inform evacuses to;11 sten to the EBS station for latest information on the l b + i Q emergency. sAll field personnel were adequately briefed on 1 7[n' the use of these badges. ) 5, s q ^

y >

a g m yg I l i ,1 s ' Decemier32 h, s Decembnr 10: Field personnel. responding to the road. impediments for both drills maintained adequate communication with the EOC i' - regarding the impediment. Any requests for additional l sup;4rt was transmitted to the EOC from the field. An-L '} ~ 4 eraL91e of this;is evidenced by, on December 2. Road Crew 2002 but of Riverhead radioing in to the EOC at 1335 t / ,reqwsting a heavy wrecker to assist in removal of the~ 4., -{ s gravel truck impediment. a i L N h l 1 i 1 s ou O M ,i x ] i 1 S .j

Patchocue-9 December 2 & December 10: The proper and accurate relaying of information from the Staging Area by the Transfer Point Coordinator to the Bus Drivers was observed during both drills. This was evidenced by the relaying to 3ur Drivers to don protective clothing, take KI and when to begin the evacuation routes. A specific example to illustrate this was the Brookhaven Substation Transfer Point Coordinator accurately explaining the rerouting of zone J-1 to the Bus Drivers during the December 10 drill. The re-routing instructions were given to the Transfer Point Coordinator by the EOC. Patchocue-10 December 2 & December 10: As of the date of this report, more detailed maps for the non-institutionalized mobility-impaired pick-ups have not s been developed. The same maps were used for these drills that were used for the exercise. More detailed maps will be developed in the near future. Patchocue-11 December 2 & December 10: Administrative Support personnel assisted in the dispatching of Special Population Bus Drivers for both drill s. For the December 10 drill, a request came in from the EOC to the Special Population Bus Dispatcher at 1034 to pre-stage an additional bus for the evacuation of the Hillcrest Adult Home. This Bus Driver was dispatched at 1120 to the home. The Bus Dispatcher waited for the return of pre-staged Special Population Bus Drivers who were dispatched at 1030. This is a good response for two reasons:

1) For the ARCA (resulting from February 13 Exercise), it took 40 mir.utes for a bus to be dispatched to a Bus Company, pick-up a bus, then proceed to the school.

For December 10, the Bus Driver proceeded directly to the M111 crest Adult Home because he already had the bus. Even though it took 46 minutes to dispatch the bus, it would arrive at the home well before the bus which wasn't pre-staged.

2) An evacuation wasn't declared until 1250, therefore this bus would alretJy be at the home to assist if an evacuation was called.

Patchocue-12 December 2 & December 10: The briefings held by the Bus Dispattners at Patchogue did l not contain any misleading information. As stated I previously, new LERO badges containing radiological and dosimetry information~were used for both drills. The Bus Dispatchers adequately and correctly briefed Bus Drivers on the use of these badges and the information on them. Patchocue-13-16 December 2.& i December 10: New LERO badges containing radiological and dosimetry information, including the use of KI and authorization of higher dose limits, were given to field personnel for both drills. Field members were adequately briefed on the use of these badges. Those field members questioned by controllers were aware of these requirements. Riverhead-1 December 2 & December 10: Times of the update were properly placed on the status-beards during both drills. (Refer to Staging Areas Objective 7 for further information). Riverhead-3 December 2 & December 10: The Brookhaven Substation Transfer Point was used at both drills. No problems were observed,~although weather was not inclement during the drills. Riverhead-4 Throuch 6 December 2 & December 10: New LERO badges containing radiological and dosimetry information, including the use of KI and authorization of higher dose limits, were given to field personnel for both drills. Field members were adequately briefed on the use of these badges. Those field members observed by controllers were aware of these requirements.

~ Recention Center-1 Not Applicable. The new Reception Centers we,'e not activated for these drills as they are still in the construction phase. -Canareante Care-1 Not Applicable. Congregate Care Facilities-did not participate in these drills per the scenario. ~ /- nal . Markovich Attachment cc: B. R. McCaffrey w/ Attachment C. A. Daverio w/ Attachment V. H. Palmiotto w/ Attachment LERO File w/ Attachment ATTACgNT1-LILCO Emergency Preparedness Drill Scenario Scenario No. 8A - Rev.1 1.2. LERO OBJECTIVES A. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) l j 1. Demonstrate the ability to receive initial and follow-up emergency notifications. 1 2. Demonstrate the ability to activate the Local Emergency Response Organization (LERO) EOC in a timely manner. 3. Demonstrate through rosters, the ability to maintain 1 staffing in the LERO EOC on a 24-hour basis. 4. Demonstrate that the LERO EOC has adequate space, equipment, and supplies to support emergency operations. 5. Demonstrate that the LERO can establish appropriate-commun.ication links, both primary and backup systems (communication with the State and county via RECS to be simulated).- 6. Demonstrate that the LERO EOC has adequate access control and that security can be maintained. 7. Demonstrate that messages are transmitted in an accurgte l and timely manner, messages are properly logged, that status boards are accurately maintained and updated, that frequent and appropriate briefings are held, and that incoming personnel are briefed. 8. Demonstrate that the appropriate official is in charge and in control of an overall coordinated response including 4 l decisions on protective action recommendations. l 9. Demonstrate.the orgar.izttional ability necessary to effect an early dismissal of schools within the 10-mile EPZ.

10. Demonstrate the ability to prepare and implement EBS in a timely manner (i.e., within 15 minutes after command and control decision for implementation of protective action recommendations).

l 11. Demonstrate the ability to assess the effect of road l impediments upon evacuation traffic and develop and l implement timely response actions. These actions may include rerouting and the broadcast of an associated EDS message, as necessary. l 1-6 j L-- -- -- ---

= _ _, ~ ATTACHMENT 1,- LILCO Emergency Preparedness. Drill-Scenario Scenario No. 8A - Rev. 1 i J B. Emergency News Center (ENC) l 1. Demonstrate the ability to activate LERO functions at the ENC in a timely manner. 2. Demonstrate through rosters: the ability to maintain q staffing of LERO functions at the ENC'on a 24-hour basis, q 3. Demonstrate the ability to brief the media in a clear accurate, and timely manner.-

4.. Demonstrate the ability to share information with other agencies at trie ENC prior to its release.

5. Demonstrate the ability to establish rad operate rumor l control in a coordinated manner. { 1 6. Demonstrate that the ENC has adequate space, equipment, and supplies to support emergency operations. 7. Demonstrate that the ENC has adequate access control and l that security can be maintained. 8. Demonstrate that the ENC has adequate reproduction capabilities to support rumor control and media briefing l activities. 9. Demonstrate the effective use of the LERO spokesperson to present timely and accuratt information to the nadia. C. Staging Areas 1. Demonstrate the ability to receive emergency notifications. 2. Demonstrate the ability'to activate the staging areas in a timely manner. l 3. Demonstration through rosters, the ability to maintain staffing at the staging areas on a 24-hour basis. 1-7

ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Emergency Preparedness Drill Scenario ~ Scenario No. 8A - Rev.1 4.- Demonstrate that the staging areat. have adequate space, parking area, equipment, and supplies to support emergency ) operations. 5. Demonstrate that the staging' areas can establish appropriate communication links with the LERO EOC and field personnel using both primary and backup systems. 6. Demonstrate that the staging areas have adequate access control and that security can be maintained. j 7. Demonstrate that messages are transmitted in 'en accurate I and timely manner, messages are properly _ logged, that i status boards are accurately maintained and updated, that appropriate briefings are held, and that incoming personnel 1 are briefed. ] i 8. Demonstrate that the appropriate official is in charge and d in control of an overall response assigned to the staging area. 9. Demonstrate the ability to dispatch to and direct emergency - workers in the field. 10. Demonstrate the ability to comunicate with all appropriate i locations, organizations, and fiel.d personnel. 11. Demonstrate the ability to assign Traffic Guides to Traffic Control posts within the two mile EPZ and to dispatch traffic guides to Traffic Control Posts in a timely manner at the appropriate. time. 4

12. Demonstrate knowledge on the part of emergency workers cf dosimetry and Potassium Iodide usage procedures and the procedures for authorization of radiation exposures above permissable Ifmits.

13. Continue bus driver training to ensure bus drivers are i

familiar with a11Tus yards and transfer points. 14. Institute the Bus Driver Maintenance System to ensure LERO Bus Drivers do not continually travel to the same Bus Company yards and Transfer Points. In addition, these l drills will serve as a make-up for Phase II of the Bus Drivers Driving Instruction Manuals. l \\ 1-8 i}}