ML20238B652

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-SC-85,consisting of Undated Modified Attachment B to Lilco Training Testimony to Reflect Actual Rac Review & Comments to Revs 7 & 8 of Lilco Plan Re Contention Ex 50.A
ML20238B652
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/07/1987
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-5-I-SC-085, OL-5-I-SC-85, NUDOCS 8709010330
Download: ML20238B652 (168)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ %^* }ODIFIED ATT)CIMENT B 'IO LIID N39AL RAC REVIIM AND CXMIEN CONTENV LERO FAILED TO TRAf EFFECT1vELY TO UNANTICIPA1 DATA ANA!Z (Df!wrICM CI11lD AIO le 1 O IFICATIG E IN 1ERO 1-C NING Ftpl% (Deeft Sipats AS ENTORF FOR EX 50.A ppnrmagS & TRAINING AS SM

  1. EX 3H: Public Information As.EdC delayed in opening:

Factually baseless. ENC no information.untii ftrst atttvation was timely. See nous conference at 0840 FEMA Report at 52. LILCO is- ~ sued press releases at 0625 I and 0639. I +- ' Sfa E:ol m: [ .S t. "oS ~ u E*N Os First news release de-Factually baseless: irrelevant Essential emergency infor-layed and inaccurate to training. Information was motion summarized and D (ENC-D-1: Insufficient timely provided. Equipment transmitted via computer I copying capabl1Itles re-problem, not training. caused from the EOC to ENC and all I suited 41 delays in distri-delays in distributing updated rumor control locations st-I bution of loformation) information. New procedures thultaneously. Additional ( and better copying capability copying equipment (total of should obviate problem, 5 machines) ensures suff1-cient capability in event C of unanticipated machine 1 fatluce. I 4 C: Second news release de-Ld. t,d. leyed (EHC D-1: Insuff4-cient copytng cag.abilitiss 1 i resulted in delays in dis-1 tribution ut laformatlon) { t I Da insufficient copying irrelevant to training. Id. ctpsbility at ENC delayed Equipment problem caused de-distelbution of information lays in distributing updated (ENC-D-1 Insufficient information. New procedures copying capabilities re-and better copying capability suited in delays in distrl-should obylste problem, button of Information) 870903o330 870507 $DR ADDCK 05000322 PDft 1 -1 Mao are the verbatim headings and " analyses" contained in Attachmnt B to T Tim's training testimony. Although generally inac trcining axilfications and tM IVC's review of those nniifications.

TRA M ING TEST N % REF 2 CT ,y 5 mis 7 & 8 w imm'S PIAN p J zg-O(- 5 57 27 % hi Ti ' [- Y-f$ )RSONNEL TO RESPOND '87 AUG 25 A7 *'51 SHD UNREHEARSED $17UAT10H5 ,.F i 00U J[ v f $ RAC IN REVIDI & LIIID m, !& B PEUIFICATIO6, RAC REVIDi & M 1. VERBATDt RAC ANALYSIS C6ATIM IN RAC IEVIDI M]DIFICATICas Otr IENS 7 & 8 MEIFICATICPS 1 .1-

c

t: r;s p: t:1 N{a .o. n HA E.o u.o.n.f ..ee,unse y Mg 5 ,,,,,e,,,,c,,,, Reserved decialon based on The plan hee bet e modilled to 1 1 M machines an 8/1/86 fact that LERO had not yet create en additiosal posittee, ' ENC erg being decided to upgrade copying LElto Spokesperson. and addia for upg reJe capabl1lties. pied stenal stof f have been essigned

re plscanesta se l

to escure bet te r coordiastion )sary. of information in the Elec. The Srdsr to eepedite 6/19/84 Lato spokesperson la respons-eg eggoe og ge. thle for coordinet lag - the re-

tion, procedurce lesse of reformation working la g,,,

,,,g,,4, coejunctium wlth sta County tracutive or kie designes, if Sttst coergency ication will be 10. he chooses to participate. The

g, g,,,

LERO epokespersea will teprea 1 sent IJho et prese conferences, eleuttaneously press rolesees are to be die-titled ele

coe, g,,c es, t enuted t..tiitt y, gover-at
rueer control and media personnet et the Elec.

j II#*** i s prowlJed in Opip,3.0.1 scc. f A ~Id.

$.2.4. ! changes in importent

{ emergency informattoa vill be [ 'electroalcelly tressaltted to l Rumor Control District offices f 'and call boerde wie TSO print- ] i out (etsu see opip 3.3.1, sec. ; p 5.3.4)., { k $ "... r{ -{ LILCO le etii1 evoluetlag the I teck' of hard i ced capability - for distr (buttoa of. Ee5 ' p3g messageel to the ; prese i n. t he j EstC. ii Unt il LlL40 completoe.the ' j evaluetton of thle equipment l for providing hard copies of Altwa Asallalde On E s.eeeeges to the.edi,, ; the. 3er(uge b yd response to thle esercise leeve la rated inadequate. i s ) y or misleading, tley am retained in this exhibit because they cbcumnt for LIIID misiepmsents po[t-February 5 13, 1986 is a l' S ! $ b j ^ }- a i

i l 49,*" BOCLEAR REOULATORY 00Mul15105 l 1 g .s Bootet Na *-W-o/- f Offlela! Exh No-la me matter edud A+ LL lenhddue % l*i l Staff 10fMTintD / Applicant RECEIVID i latervener SEJECTED Cent's Off't --- Centreeter DATE ?YD 4teer witneu u ~., s-i ,en., i l l l ) 1 ) l 1 I 1 i l \\ l I i 1. l l i l t

DATA ( 0%3NTIO*4 C11U) AND PODIFICATKNS IN UJO STNEJS AS SUPFORY FOR EX 50. A Immunes 61PAINDG g gggg g ggg 0 I5 1 sE= i .3 U 50h O 85$ Es Insuf f ic ient / l:$adequa t e Irrelevant to training. Facts The suggested displays and AuCA mdpb and Olkpimyb bebud on equipment defSciency. status boards have besn (ENC-ANCA-2: Irisuf f ic lent provided to the ENC. mapa dnd displeyb) mO I" EU{ m m \\ N0h .*t C &af Fs EDS mebsmoe contained Minor and corrected by revi-Press Release procedures ARCA catroneous information sluns in LERO procedures and have been modified. EDS (ENC ARCA-J EDS messages followup training. mensages will no longer be contained entraneous inf or - released. The Coordinator matlon) of Public Information pre-pares press releases using an estabilphed format. The Olrector of Local Responsa approves it. The LERO Spokesperson directs dis-tribution to the media. LERO Public Information Group Personnel receive training in the new proce-dures in the LERO Public Information labletop Drill (Rev. Nov. 1986). G: Press eeleases Duplicative of Contention (see EX 38.B above) iate/inaccurmte (ENC-D-l: EX 38,C. Irrelevant to Insufficient copying capa-training. Information was blIitles aebutted in delays timely provided. E qu i prne n t in distribution of informa-problem caused delays in tion) distributing updated t r.f orma-tion. New procedures and bet-ter copying capability should obv'-* aroblem. %.W W

Svzm av HAc In mytm w I.zun mMi 7 s e MaoirtCATICD6 pac gyyy y gao . VtseATIM RAC MLysts amo visewrIM Di suc mvIm MoorrIcnTIcas or sevs 7 s 8 mDIFICATICHS g _- Q ,g .5" gg-.' .3 = 1*: 11 4:3 gga

?!

q tl

=

Ltna nerpuase (ACTIOut rEna Evolueti. uf t.Eno se.g. nee 3: { s; .j .o" The suggssted addt-9/4/86 Adequately address the en-The suggested displays and A 1 ercise issue, statue boerde are to be posted tisaal displaye and sistus boarde ulti be in the brieftog room. No plan prsvidsd to the ENC. revletone ' are necessary to i eddreas this eseretse issue. l l l The use and effectiveness of the additional Ep1 map to track i pate and plume path and the use l ond effectiveness of the ECI. Statue Board should.be evalu-sted et a future eseretec. 1 ) l { n w. o ~ c <w OU" t%8 21E 3:1 21 25: ="5 LEA 3 Barpunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evoluet ios of.LEAO Seepense If ..k E j Ths toersency press 9/1/86 The plan modifications ade- .The plan hee been modified. A 1 rettesse, uhtch do not quotely address the Opip 3.8.1, Sec. 3.4.4, to conteen dateted mete-exercise thsue, require the LERO Spokesperson i rist, util be pos:ed to have e staff member dio-l to t h ENC

  • tribute lord copies of correct press releases (Ess messages) which have been received wie j the TSO synee.

We plen ac,di f icet tune se quotely address the anatclee teaue. Training of plo staf f et the ENC should be asaluated at a future eseretse to ensure that e st r ane ous lettraatton f ree ESS message draf t s le not inad ve r t e nt ly given to the .edia. 3 l TI APERTURE CARD (see EX 38,B) Also Available On Aperture Card dI 8709010330 'r _h

5 DATA ANAINSED BY UN!nfrICDI CI'11D Alc IGIFICATWS IN IRO M7'8 mg m m STN!W AS stMORr FOR Ex 50.A PpntmegS & 'IHAINING AS S'IMTD VID4]l i i 1 l Evacuation decision Id. (see EX 38.8 above) j l van to' media too' late LNC-D-la insufficient gylng capabiii t les re-Si t ed in delays in distrl-atton at information) Media eequested not to Factually baseless. In accor-3fosei pubilt of LERO dance with 1.ERO procedures ]rkes s' ingebtlon of K1 media were never briefed about LERO workers' KI ingestion, ENC personnel unable to Factually baseless. Facts do i ovide information to not demonstrated a failure to ) dias unable to contact provide the media information. 3rketing Evaluations Not admitted. i 3 ENC log falsely indl-Esercise events do not impil-Sted gravel truck impedl-cate deficiency in training. ]nt was belfig removed The inaccurate information was not released to the public or 1 the media. 1 l la ENC personnel could not Factually baseless. LERO ciswer questions about im-spokesperson reported essen-colment tial detalls including loca-tion of road blockage and rerouting of traffic, la ENC mlbbiated facts insignificant. Isolated errors bout (1) whute Emergency during a whole day's worth of as fluclas ud (0873, correct public information do not es-tme was 0819), (2) EP2 tablish a training problem. inter vb. summer popula-lon ): teslayets delivery of Onsite function: 'I r r e l e ve n t to (see EX 30.0 above) te ebb seleases 4 and 5 to training. Media Monitoring bala Monitoring (ENC-D-la receives information through oisuf f ic ient copying capa-EDS messages, does not have illities eesulted in delays immediate need for news re-a distribution of informa-leases. Equipment problem loni caused delays in distributing updateo information. New pro-j cedures and better copying ca-pability should obviata prob-j lem. ): Rumus Control operation Dupilcative of Contention coef f ect ive as described in EX 39, i

ontcntion Ex 39

): LERO modifications Irrelevant to training. 1 euld be inadequate to rem-Conclusory allegation not Gy "dsfittencies" based on Emercise events. M 39: Humus Lontrol 1 in Edll Duas d Oper a tors Onsite function. Irrelevant (see EX 38.8 above) 3ad ind L (,,el a l H / Outdated to LERO trainings factually infuimations answeeed in-baseless. The few instances )utrles tou blowly or in-of superseded information re-

orret t l y lENL-D-la inbut-suited from an equipment prob-

'icient copying capabili-lem. New procedures and bete Lles at ENC resulted in de-ter copying Capability should lays in distributing intcr-obviate problem. Istton t o r umor control De r s onrie l )

    • %ed

[f ! C IN IEVInw & LIIIp VUWATIM M.C. ANALYSIS n. EDU'ICATIM & ISO r!M IN E b m orr a rt = = mw : omc l. l (see EX 38.8) .l ) i .1 J d 0 i s I I l I .1 (see Ex 38.0) l i I J T1 APERTURE CARD (see EX 38.8) 'Also Available On Aperture Card e i 8709 0103 30 4 P - .t _= J

DATA ANAL,YED CDf!DrflGi CI1tD AIO 10DIFICATIGIS IN 1250 IENS 1 C014EISKN)ING FDIA CEMENT RDmlS AS SUPPORF FOR EX 50.A Pf00IMES 61HAINING As ymTIg). h Late eebponses to Onsite function. Irrelevant ilmuleted rumor messages to trainings conclusory and fac*ually baseless. Responses to messages were as espedi-tious as accuracy would allow. Personnel acted according to precedures. Rumor Control personnel Onsite function. Irrslovant (see EX 38.8 above) )rovidad inaccu-to training. Information pro- 'Ote/ superseded information viced was generally timely and GNP-D-Is Insufficient correct. Isolated Instances $pying capabilities at ENC of inaccurate information werw 'Osulted in delays in based primarily on an equip- )lst t lbut istu inf ormat ion to ment problem. New procedures 'umo r conte'ol personnel) and better copying' capability shoulC obviate problem. !X 44: _ilbt sentence con-Irrelevant to training. Fac-with EX 38 and tually baseless. Enercise $olidated T 39): Failure tu provide events do not support allega-5ccurate, c lear information tion of substantial evacuation ]ould create a substantial shadow. )v8custion " shadow" QL_22F1 False assumption le relevant to training. Df no ps emu t us e evacuation C or.c l us o r y allegation not based on Exercise events. (X 41: Teaffic impediments 1 Slow mobillastlun of Irrelevent: not a training Good Crews problem. Factually baseless. Sufficient Road Crews were mo-biltrad in accordonce with pro c esca r e s. n8Ia t5h .f"' ';; ;g "t 3$#1 1 ):, Fallue e to respond ade-Duplicativa of Contentions T affic Engineer added to D 1 pately to two road impedt-EX 42.8 and EX 45.A. Facts do EOC. LERO Traffic Control ents: (1) Communications not demonstrate a pervasive Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May. ' allures at EOC (EOC-D-la training flaw. Isolated in-1986) and PAR / Accident M r.n - )eleys in responding to two stances of communciations agement Tabletop Drill III )vecuation impediments) -problems readily correctable (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasize by revisions in LERO proca-responding to evacuation dures and training, impediments including com-nonication of information. equipment r equi rement s.. r e-sponse priorities, and al-- ternate traffic routing. LER9 Classroom Training Program materleAs for Ses-sion 8 "Traf f ic Cont r ol" (Rev. July. 1986) empha-stres communication of in-formation and timely re-sponse to evacuation imned-iments. ww

p/ RAC IN IEV1W & t.114D G #0 DIP'ICATICNS, IWC MVIDI & 1250 VE3EATIM RAC WLYSIS FATIM IN IWC IEVIBf KDIFICATICDE & IEVE 7 & 8 MDIFICATIQ4S (see Ex 38.8) lii .5" 0C0 og E.: 4"= 1%1 5% 12" "I I a

    • S

. $. l. -=ae .1 U FDtA Evaluat ion of LEA 0 Sesponse II f 3]O Buspense ( ACTioet) Ocidarts have been S/26/86 Atlequa t e l y address the is-The ples hee been revloed go a g sues raised in the emer-add a traf fic engineer to the citued sad revloed else. etaff et the EOC to evaluate > tuare.teforsettoe say poselbte tapedimente to ) trpediments to avecusttoe and to make reco 'weetly p: aced to all sendettone ce necessary changes )lseest perconnet and to evacuation routes is ceerdiacetd respones rpy AL response to potentist lopedt-

p timatt ed.

la addt. Tl ments. procedures for field g T. {v a? U kDe. e Traffte

  • G
workers, i.e.,

bue drivere, Utnter hee been traffic guides, etc., have been {AgIg-o D4 to the lino EOC

    • dified to include lastruc-Laff to esetzt in tiene to make prompt mottit-7eluiting and cations through their esmount-aveloping alternate cation netwurk of eer poteettel rting.
  • mish e On t.pedt.e.t.

p,.eletone nave bene made to teoue se ass r Trsific Culdence 5/26/46 dpertart Cnrr) message la the event that

hts Top TT4 hee changes te evacustsee rostee Da modified to a re e * **... e r y.

serporate the Xngas to the pro-1 sternal ceamue t cet tone witble gqooo103c)O,Q3 A rcs. Attachment o the u.0.= re..rdt., seeses. -et of ou res,o.ee to evacue. t i-i.si-nte se,e iees W"_--,_. _ _ _ _ _ - _. _ _

I %."% CATA ANAI.Y3H O N!13frICN CI1tD M c M]DIFICATIGE IN 1E10 M COIGESPOODC FM COP 9 eft FDdUS AS SLPPORr FC2 IDC 50.A PgrrmasS & 'DtAINDG AS SumE i I i l l l I l 1 t I l S I "d wt l E%$ .C 1 2 0 $.> j 8o41 i ARCA (2) Delay in field Minor and readily corrected by LERO Traffic Control proco-l verification of fuel truck revisions in LERO procedures dures have been revised to impsdim3nt (EOC-ARCA-9: and training. empedite dispatch of per-Oslay in fiele verification sonnel responding to inci-of fowl truck impediment) dents identified by the EOC. LERO field personnel j i now receive training with increased' emphasis on re-sponses to evacuation im-pediments, Modifications have been made ins (1) LERO Evacuation Route Spotter Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May. 1986): (2) LERO St ag tng Area Manageinent Tabletop Drtil III (Rev. May, 1986)I (3) LERO Traf-fic Control Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May, 1986): (4) LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Con-trol" (Rev. July. 1986). .r =

IsY HAC IN HEVIW OF' l.IIID ? & 8 80Dir1CATIOS. RAC P1VIDI T IDO VERDATIM RAC ANALYSIS VERHATIM IN RAC EVIW KIMICATICNi OF IEVS 7 & 8 DIFICATICNS adequately addressed through modificattoe to the procedures (esp. Ofir 1.6.3 Tref fic Coa-trol). The Evacuattoa toute Coordinator le responalble for obtaining periodie updates f ree the Evacuation Beute Spotters, and immediately reperttag road impediments or other problems to the Traffic Coattet Co-ordinator end Road legiatice Coordinator (see Ortr 1.6.1, Sec. 5.6.7). lead Traffic Cutdes (at the staging arose) are to report any facident that has the potentist for stoutng the evacuation beoed oe reporte free Traffic Culdee in the field. to the Traffic Control potat Coordinator in the Lato EDC (Orir 3.6.3, sec. 5.3.6). 11pon notification of a road tapedtaeat from the Evacuation toute Coordinator, the Road legiatics Coordinator la re-sponsible for ensuring that se adequate numbe r of suitable road cree vehicles are die-patched to respond to the t apedlesent (see Or:P 1.6.1, sec. 5.5 10). N plan mod t i t e et ion ade-quately addresses the tsouse raised in tLe esercles. Effec-tive use of these plan modtil-catione steuuld be evatusted at -e 4etwee eseretsea I h n: 0;a Uj

g

Me ff FEM 4 Evaluation of LOO Response IE khh ! 1.fR3 Rvsponse ( ACTION) The plan has been moJtiled (see A I Frucsixrse and train-9/l/86 Adequately address the en-0 Fir 3 6.3 Sections 3.1, 5.2.4 . ing util be revised to arcise issue. and 5.4.2), to assure that att 'sttou flastbtitty in impediments to evacuation utt!

per;cenet assignment.

be proeptly

reported, that

. This L;li t ensure that

  • ddittoaal pereoanet are die-peresinet are immedt-patched la en ma odited manner, r
a.t el y dirpatched for and that there is coordination i ecediment verifica-

'h between the Traf fic Control Co-t ordinator, the Evacuation Coor, itics er ather evacua. APERTURE dinater and the iv-usu-

tion selgucy:

Soute Coordinator. The Evacua- {Jy@ tion Soute Coordinator le responetble for obtaining peri-l odic upJetes from Evacuation Route Spotters (See orir 3.6.3, Also Available On 5"" ** 5 ' 0 - ad e qu.a. i, "ad d r e s. ""d'- fic.tions l Aperture Card the aercies soeve. m l effectiveness of tralalag of the Evaluation toute Coor-dinator and coanunications with Route Spottare via staging l Arese should be waMted at a I future esercles. 8'?090103 d N 1

g DATA ANA (DintfrIGl CITED APO NDITICATIQui IN IDO - J (DWWSPCIOING FEMA Gnefr STAWS AS SATORr 702 ElX $0.A Plu3DUIES & TilAINING AS 5 1 l Sfa j j. U.:- . a:h, x (J) Appeopttale Factually baseless. Personnel LERO Traffic Control Tab-ANCA persunnel not dispatched to and equipment required to letop Drill V (Rev. May. remove multiple vehicle ac-clear blocked road were sent 1986) emphastres communica-c idstit road Impediment to accident. Facts do not tion directly between the (PSA ANCA Us Appf upr iate demonstrate a training flaw. EOC and Road Crews to en-personnel not dispatched Any problems were minor and sure appropriate response. tu cleas multiple vehicle eeadily correctable by eevi-scc idwest #ved l ueped i men t ) Stons in LFRO procedures and LERO Classroom Training t r ainleig. Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Control" trains traffic control per-sonnel. including Road Crews, to communicate by radio with the Road Logis-tics Coordinator at the l EOC. l C Not admitted. Di Not admitted. Es Addittun of Traffic En-Irrelevant to training, ' gineer to EOC would not Conclusory allegation not 011minste flans in dealing based on Esercise events. eith road impediments EX 223: Idealt with under Id, ER'41f~Trroneous assump-tien that LERO neads to be Gble tu deal with only two road impediments EX_42_1 Bases incorporated In Ex 38 & EX 39) An untimely / Ineffective Duplicative of Contentions (see EX 41.0 above) response to road impedt-EX 41.0 and EX 45.A. i mer)t s ( EUC-D-l : Delays in responding effectively to read Impediments) ww

IED BY RAC IN IEVijed & LIIID D 7 6 8 EDIFICAT106, RAC IEVIEW & M VERBATD4 RAC ANALYSIS FED VERATIM IN Rhc IEVIEW IEX)IFICATICMg & M 7 6 0 IEDIFICATIM l ,* aO ..'Qd .-u-g L. X. -e [":A ((3 St S =* 22% o t n: o p hER) terpense ( ACTION) PEMA Evaluetion of.LERO Respunee Ij uj U lftsr rutd creue are N/A Adequately address the en-MRO's response is adequate to A 3 )lipetched to their orcise issue.

  • ddress the teous of inappro-J1314 positione ti.e y priate equipment being sent to sosaunicate via radio re, pond to the lopediment pith tha EOC.

The problem introduced in the ener-bed Traf fic Guides at clee. Plan revisions made in )he Strgirg Aree do ' respomos to deficiency 12A0 EOC t dicide which a should be sufficient to en-tech 3 sre to be die-sure timely resposee to evacua-sched to a particu-tien impediments. Procedure er 1:pedleemt. Ortr 3.6.3 Sec. S.5.10 hae l been added and now makes eleer I that once dispatched from their l prestaged locettoe to respond to en impediment problem, road creve are to be in radio con-tact with the 50C. The Road Creu procedure (Attack. 2 of Opt r 3.6.3, sec. 6 Page 2 of

2) opecifies that Road Creue are to contact the Road legiotics Coordinator et tW EOC if probicos erlee.

The effectiveness and LERO worker knculedge of these procedures should be evaluated at a future ensreise. l l l TI APERTURE CARD I (see EX 41.0) Also Available On i \\' Aperture Card i 8709 010 3 30 -of l 2

~ % %. DATA AIM (Ipfturr!GI CI11lD AIO KUITICATIOG IN IDD { 00RisSPOMIG tw1A (Ipeeff SUdUS AS RPPORr PGt EK $0. A PlunGDUIES 611EINING AS G 8Ia DEI* bh a E a,. 8: Untimely / inadequate re-Duplicative of Contention LERO procedures modified to ARCA sponse to Ridge School EX 45.8. Factually baseless, ensure additional staff are evocnettua messaue Dispatch of bus 33 minutes used to assist the Special (PSA-ARCA-lla Forty minute after receipt of request at Populations Bus Dispatcher. dalay in dinpatthing Bus P$A was timely under circum-LERO Classroom Training ma-Driver to evacuate school

stances, terials for Session 9 cfilldren)

" Transportation Coordinator" and " Pro-tective Actions for Special Populations" emphasize need for assistance in empediting special popula-tion buses. Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletops also emphastze this. l l S I;- Go d l av$ r l EI-

t, g C: Inability to handle un-Duplicative of Contention gu, ggy-espected eumura EX 39.

D Inability ut tr af f ic Readily correctable by revi-LERO Classroom Training anca Guldas to respond to stons in the LERO procedures Program materials for evacuee gamstions and tralning. 5est. ton 8 " Traffic Control" (PSA-ARCA-7: Teaffic (Rev. July 1986) now Goldss lacked complete in-trains Traffic Guides to formation un the approprl* Instruct evacuees to listen ato dastinalton for to the EBS radio station avstumes for evacuation information ~ including evacuation desti-nations. LERO identifica-tion Badge for Traffic Guldes, listing job-related duties on the back, in-structs them to advise evacuees to listen to the EBS station. l I L 22__-____

_ _ _ _ _ = pe BY HAC IN IW.V1]W W 1.IIID ) 7 5, 8 MODIFICATIGE, RAc psynw w IJgo VENIATIM RAC ANA!XSIS j 3 wasmTIM IN RAC lt. DM KO1FIchTIOS T IEW 16 8 MODIFICATIONS 1 V 1 i l l 1 .30' I:G3 4 .I. 2.

  1. ~3 3

3:3 1:1 t"8

  • 22
  • q*

3 ?. i. gi [oy renA c ul uiI of. tao a ep ne. 32 o g g,,,,,,,gac,, m casso. a vill be 9/1/s6 Adequately address the en-The plan hos been mod e r sed in A 1 l arcise issue. OPly 3.6.S. Sec. S.S.2. to in- )eload to indicate en struct the Special Populettone .i 1]itlesel II,no eteri tue Diepeccher to eseign e )rzon artti geolet the Treaefer reist Coordinator to rela! ropulettone oeslot le briefing drivere to D Dirpitcher. esaure a note fleely dispatch. These plee modifications which odequately address the esercise j seca should be eninted et a fvtore eseresse. q l 1 b d k i 1 l 1 l O 5 a ,g .5- ':GO 25 X*. 'I 12" 1%* 35 .21 .t. I .1

  • ggl9y (D0 arepunse ( ACTloes)

FtMA tweluet ion of 1. tao seep no. 3 E, .c ED Traf t te cuide Pre-9/1/66 Adequately address the en-The plan hee been modified. A 1 Cd tre will be modi-ercise issue. Ortr 3.6.3 Attachment 8 Sec. e 'ste is Ber. S. 10 to instruct 'the traffic guides to infore evacuees to listen to the ESS redte stetten i for the latest emergency le-forestion. T{ The ples modificettoa ede- ...t.i, ou, s.. t .sercise 2iPERTURE is ~ 6 - ied.e of traffic guides to teatruct C>ARD <' <- 5 ' ' ' ' ' h * *5 8tettee for informatten should be evaluated at a future . urcise. Also Available On Aperture Card l r 8709 010 3 30 -D s / l ) w__u___________

r; %e f 4 L LATA 4 l- '+- MDJMCATIQas IN Uys0 QNTWirKW CITED AND NMDDING FEMA CC!M2fr STARS AS SWPORr FC3 EX $0. A - PNX2DullES & TIEINING [9 r 6 h m l 'e Of \\ t iU' l E" t ~ e L .%O s w s i i I e, Traffic Guides now' wear Aach D. (cont.) Inability of Facts do'60% demonstrate a (Traffic Guides to know en-pervastre flaw in AERO LERO Identification Badges cose dose authorization training program. Minor, iso-enumerating radiological procedure (PSA-ARCA-16s lated incidents readily cor-, procedures on the back for Tr af f ic Guides did not on-rectable by revisions in LERO quick reference in the darstand encess dose autho-equipment and training. field. The Badge clearly states that they will re-rization procedures) ceive authorization for en-t cess esposure from the Lead Traffic Guide. Escess dose authorization procedures are now emphasized in re-vised LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dostmatry and Exposure Con-trol" (Rev. July. 1986). I 3.g l UU Et t:"f AIJ E Some bus driverw failed LERO procedures and traleMng Bus Drivers are now as-o to carry out their assigned have been modified to ensure signed routes randomly in dulles (PSA-D-6: Bus driv-that every Bus Driver la capa-order to familiarize them ers dslaywd, went to wrong 'ble of driving any randonly with a variety of routes t r ansf er po tret, or missed assignwd route. they might be called on to segmsnt of assigned route) drive. Transfer Point Coordinators now check bus dispatch forms upon Driver's arrival to confirm that the Driver is at the correct transfer point. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for SWaston 9 " Transportation Coordination" (Rev. July, 1986), the Transportation Tabletop (Rev. May. 1986) and the Staging Area Man-agement Tabletop (Rev. May, 198G1 emphastro that Bus 4 Drivers report to the Transfer Point Coordinator for verification of the Bus Dispatch Form to ensure that the Driver is at cor-rect location. Dus Driver Driving Instruc-tion Training (Rev. May, 1986) emphasizes the new verification procedures. The session includes a Road Rally in which each Driver runs a route to designated check locations.

,? _. _ y [ ') ND BY. ItAC IN IWVIEW & !.IIID -. ) ) 'I vepobtfM~ARCANALYSIS l ~ e. M 7 & 8 48)1PICATIGS, anC payggi y gdggy. & R4VE 7 & S IgI)I M IOG fff") EleWTIM Di DAC IEVIWW ICDITICkrIOS 2 !} .j% f n ) ll ^ _ h' ~~ ' "j J. .j n.. ~,g. s .- T 4 3 y- "r- ;::cep eL x 3..;l

  • ~:.

in, $ 1 M' 141 + t' 8 3 3.? i. ' .gt' y)

i
e. ]

L: u n. - ee <.C = s ,c,s. v.i u.t 4...I u .es-se

q x

e CDs P2tchogue Stegl'ng II/A MMe response to 'adequat e. A-1 titsce the teous relates-to j 4., 4 Crea itse 13. 3 I j,ttpintag of seergency workere 1 + 'f . g v rege6.11ag esposure control. '^/ ' Lguyo rowltment to emphaelse J J. thle espect in its training le responsive. Tho effectiveme*e c y of IA80's emergency worker 4 radiological espeente costrel tretning abould be evaluated at ' s ?., a future esercise. r ,\\ l t I p .) > f j .s i 4 \\', .. i r qy -u- ,3 .-e: 3: i. g ~.,: g ~. - . g 1, l 2 4'g I 2I ait l 1.E80 Siepunov ( ACTiced) puta go,8..gnon og,Lgno ges, 4j .uI t.ERO's investigetton 8/8/86 Adequately edriress the to-The plan hee been revloed. 0FIF - A I J si aht prubles re-sues raised iri the ener* 3.6.4, sec. S.5.13, to require eestrd that during cles. the bus drivers to show their p3st dettle bus dri-Dispeech Form to the Treaefer este havs re peat edl y Point Coordinator to seeure eeluntssted to go to that the drivere beve reached g l.e gene trenefer the correct locettoa. This potata cnd bus yards. vertfleetion of arrivet et the

Thus, tl.e y had not desired trenefer point to.elso become familiar with i covered in the Treaefer rotat J

the ether pesetble Coordinator's Procedure l*catione. lit.0D will (Attachment <8, Sec. 7 ef OrlF run "rsed telltes* to 3.6.4 ). liies sie bue drivere feettleties themselves These ' plan. endt ficettone ode-with.sther bue yarde quotely. address' t.he esercise ies. e a. m id e evoimete. ,a tt..sf-,oi.t.. hg et a future esercise. A In the future, ees r-11 gm, .,re,. red-ee CARD tralning will force - the ses af difforest treneftr. points and Also Available On 6=* -r*'da-Tressier Putat Coor-Aperttire Card dinitst Frucedure will indleste that bus dio-pitch forme are to be (twched epva delver's ar r ival, les Rev. 7. 8709010330 - o 7


.---a_.,--a-

.-n_

m l%QL '.h. DATA (IrmWPKW CPIM) ADE)' ICDIFICATIO45 IN IDO CD GGDING 1W% QMHfr FIKIUS A5 5tPPORY FOR EK 50.A PPmmES & TRAINDG Q ~~.E,F: f. 3 jk 0; 4 l

  • e rc 4

5 c E E 3: L l Traffic -Traffic Guides are no" D j Fs Trattic Guides-arrived Factually baseless.

  • late at cunt s o n poirit a Guides critical to a con-prestaged for i nmied t a t e (RSA-D-2:

Trafttc Guide trolled evacuation manned dispatch within the 0-2 dalayed in arriving at con-their posts in a timely mile EPZ apon emergency trol points) fashion. Irrelevant to declaration. LERO Traffic training lasue. Any problem Control Tabletop Drill V was procedural. Procedures (Rev. May. 1986) and l l have been modified. Stagirig As ea Management. Tabletop ( R e v.. May. 1906) emphasize prestaging and rapid deployment of Traffic Guldes in 0-2 mile EPZ. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-ston 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July-1986) empha-stres pre-equipping and pe e-assigning of Traffic

Guides, nOf m

Io it 03. 1 3:j .F. ( s.un. t ) Hus de lvers tiot le s elevant to training issue. LERO Classroom Training ARCA dispatched in timely Drivers were dispatched ac-Program materials for fashion (PSA ARCA-1 Bus cording to procedures. Prob-Session 9 " Transportal tori drivers not dispatched lem related to quantity of Coordination" (Rev. July, until 2 hous s af ter trained personnel avellable to 1986) non emphasizes that smarDency declaration) assist Dispatcher in distribu-Transfer Point Coordinator tion of'dostmetry. FEMA rec-assist Bus Dispatchers with ommended additional personnel distribution of materials be provided to assist in bus and dosimetry in order to dispatching. Bus dispatch espedlte dispatch of Bus procedures have been modified Drivers. to provide additional help. The Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletop Drills (Rev. May. 1986) emphastre need for assistance in rapid dis-patch of buses. -Dosimetry Tabletop Drill VI (Rev. Nov. 1986) emphasizes need for rapid distribution of dostmetry io large groups such as Bus Drivers. =c

S,Y112) BY IW IN HLVUW CF 1.!!ID BEVS 7 6 8 Pt DIFICATIGE, gggg y g Vt:RBATIM HAC ANALYSIS rN110 VI:MtATDt IN RAC IEVl!W EDITICATICIS CF HENS 7 6 B KDIFICATIOS 1 1 l ? qu C .1 l te-20. g: 13

2. ; ?.

oaa 21 att "el k0E Lt:63 Response ( ACT1000) i IIMA E'83 ellen of _LERO Response 4m Traf fic Culdes will be $/26/86 Adequately address the ts-b4tf acet tom of procedures Of tr A I pre-sg st yped for imme-sues relsed in the ener-3.6.3 and Opip 4.S.1 to recruit

cise, et least tL ee (3) non.seeg5aed digte dt peech for the 2 cite t.rZ.

An addt-traffic guides to seeist le the tisa=1 person will be distribution of field kite le essigned to oestet adequate to address thle emer-with squiswat distri-case leeue, bution. 1 1 i e .3* OGO .i ". gut 5: "3% 0%A .a; e

=

ggo =a 4.E 0 Brepunse ( ACTl0 ell FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Response 4,'. .o u There le no require-N/A Reserved decision peruling FEMA and the RAC have reviewed g g sett to dispatch bus completion of further modt-edditionel information supplied drtvsre within two ficetson of LERO procedares by LILCO regarding this toeve heure cf a Site Area to assure timely briefings and have changed the originet rm3rgtacy. The dio- .and distribution of reting in the report from a ptch of bus drivere dostmetry to Bus Drivers, Def f etency to en Ares kequiring Corrective Action. As dio-c:es gri t hin the sines cuesed in the esercise report, ditettr5 la the lea 0 the deleye in dispatching bee plea. Srs enelyele of drivers were due to teoutng dirgsst r h, Attachment doelmetry and to deleye la 2. briefing the number of per-TI

sonnel, bue drivere end trenefer point coordinator, L,prpp DAL A v J

prior to dispatching. FEMA recognises that there le no RD requirement within the ples to A dispatch bue drivere from the Staging Aree within two (2) hours of a Site Aree Emergency. 4h Nel rEMA eleo recognises that step 5.3.4 of Orir 3.6.4 requires Apw. Gi r) the Bue Coordinator (et the LERG EoC), se directed by the Transpottetton Support Coor-dinator, to begin laplement e-tion of bus operatione et the Site Aree Imrgency; and it et the first buses are to be dio-patched from the Trenefer 3 30 -~ r i te ao e er then oe g't 00 010 ,-, e u e r ud

T w W. W Q3fftNr1CN CITED APO >'.1)IFICATIOCi IN IDO CG m ESPC W W EU M Cottt2rr STA2W AS RA10RT FOR EX 50.A 170C2DUM:S & TMINDG AS w .a

ZED BY IW' Di HISVllM (F 1.IllD 7 & S M &FICATI(.Ni, RAC RLVIIM C7 IDO N VI:HIATIM DI BAC itV. IDI D IFICATI M 7 8 MD CRTICNS f f a . c. to: ~ oOe WO 2;? 3:* M{ FEMA Evatuetion of 8.E80 Besponse I[ j te rommendat ion to evacuate the public. However, the Bus Die-patcher (s) et the Staging Areas ese responalble - with the sesistence of uncoenitted Transfer point Coordinator not already dispatched from the stegfag Arad (see OPIP 1.6.4

  • ection 5.5.8) for briefing bus drivere and serif yin's that they are property equipped with a bue driver packet and dos.

laetry. The buses evaluated on t he day of t he esercise were able to complete their routes within the time frames set forth in the plan. However, it is FEMA's j udge. ant that the dispeech of bue drivers from the Staging Areas must be sapedited so that buses w!!! be evallable for dispatch from the transfer pointe to complete their evacuation routes within the prescribed time frames in all scenarios. The Bus Dis-pat cher(s) opparently did not 4 adequately use uncommitted Transfer ruint Loordinatore in dispatching Bue Drivers free ti e, Magin1Aa (88 Jruulted by Section S.S.8 of Or r 3.6.4). Based on further analyels of information made evaliable by LILQ). FT.HA d e t e r-mined that the Evacuation Co-ordinator did not 8sene ins t ructions to prestege buses to tiw Transfer rotate untti om hour and t uent y minutes after the Site Area Emergency was known to personnel at the LERO EOC (see page 86 of t.1LCO's First Eaquest for Adolecions and Third Set of laterrogetories Directed to suffolk County, New York State, and the Town of Southeepton, dated December 1. 986). This le contrary to Section 5.1.1 of OPIP 3.6.4 which requires the Manager of local Response to 3 -{ dicect the Rvecuation Coor-r J dinator to begin sna prestaging g of buses to some or all of the A M Transfer pointa upon declara-t ion 4,f a Si t e Area Emergency. Hence, LERO did not foliov the AI6o Availalile On resources and/or make use of Aperture Card trainins) and this esercise leave will remain unresolved Nt17r-y tsur-!ir-Teviset~ yg 8709010830 -0 9

'IATA UNnNTICN C1'ISD A10 KOIFICATICNS IN IMO ggg ptsats AS RMOftr FOR EK 50. A - P10027JIES 6 TRAINDC AS i j ) f G k NC pel mutine l failed to DuptlCative of Contention respond oppropelata1y to EX 38, media questlona y y,$ j OTHER FEMA COMMENT ClifD j DUQ ':: a g O t 3 #j EOC-ARCA-2 Confusion re-Irrelevant to training conten-LERO will implement the new l D gard irig the method of nott-tion. Procedures were fol-recommendation thet it con. fying the Federal Aviation lowed durIng the SNerCine, tact FAA directly. A let-Admleils t r d t iuti ( *AA") FEMA subsequently recommended ter of agreement with FAA a new notification procedure will be obtained and EOC (RAC Heview. Dec. 15 1986). personnel designated and i trained t o c ommun i c.a t e with I FAA. I l l i i l i i I w up -D

,/ ],YIfD BY RAC IN IRVI1W OF IJ1H) MNS 7 6 8 moIrICATI(NS, pac aggIgg op gag) VERBATIM HAC ANALYSIS RTID VD6 ATIM IN ISC it. ID4 MX)IFICATIOg; & IENE 7 & 8 3CDIFICATICNS V Q" .. O J

~.

S~ l e: at: %%e rr.nA E.esui s.n of t.sa0 supunee 3,{ [jj esaura timely briefings and distributloa of dr,elmetry under ett scenerlos to the large number of bue drivere required j to be dispatched free the l patchogue staging Area. The effectiveness of and tragalag la these plea modificetlose should be evaluated et a future eseretee. 9 LW = .5-OGC 2.5 F. e it: SI . f.r E. =ag $%5 .hy

  • g

( rEMA Ewelust ion of LE40 Besponse II u 4.fa3 Artpunne (ACTION) RAC made new recommende-The plan hee been revloed to a g procedures have t.ee n 5/26/86 tions which LERO to imple-add a traf fic engtaaer to the reviewed and revised menting. etaff et the EOC to evaluate tu ensure informattoa say poselble impediments to en trpedimente le evacuation sad to make recoer-promptly poseed to all mandatione se necessary changee relaunt personnel and to evacuattoo routes in la coordinated response response to potential tapedi. lltptrmaxttd. In addl. mente. preceduree for flegd

ltiza, e

traffic

workere, lee.,

bus drivere, i Englant hee been traf fic guidae. etc., have been I eddxd to the 4.1R0 EDC

  • adified to include lastruc-sagtf to oes t att in tions to make prompt nottft.

evslutting and cattoes through their commuot-1 ] cattoe network of eay poteettel diestoping alternate i tretang. g lepediment. provietoes have r been

    • de to leeue en Ess The Traffic Cuidance 5/26/86 a
          • se in the event that

{*gg T: bis Top YT-6 hoe changes to evacuattoo routes bo ss modlited to l are necessary. licarportts the changis to the pro-laternal teamunications withia csdrcos. Attachment Aleo Ava lable 0:1 th. Lan0 m rege,.ing asse,s. i i.

  • "' a' ad raeaae ta saca-Aperture Card ttoa lopedimente beve been adequately eJdressed through I

audilleetton t o t he proceduree I (esp. Opip 1.6.1. Traf fic Con-trol). The Evacuation Route Coordinator se responalble for obtaining per to.ite upJetes f ru. l j i 87 09 010 3 30 -t o

g DATA Alt %LY g2mNr1CN CIDD MO KUIFICATICNS IM D3O O OJRFt:SIO O U G ID E LD M 78 pgms AS SUPl@tr DDR I:X 50.A P N 6MNmG AS l I 3._ "1 $ utn 0:" ;g; 5:# EOC-ARCA 'J; The Long In-Irrelevant to training conten-LERO procedures have been ARCA land Rutleueti ("LIRR") was tion. Procedures were foi-modified. The Evacuation mot notitteil lowed during the esercise. Coordinator notifies LIRR of emergency status. LERO Accident Management Tab-letop Drill III (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasizets new re-sponsibility of Evacuation Coordinator to notify LIRR. w

3 [ BY RAC IN REVIDI & IJigD 7 & 8 MUIFICATICNS, RAC FtVIDI & IIND VERBATDI RAC ANALYSIS VpfnATIM IN RAC NNIDd MIIIFICATICNs & SENS T & 8 MILIFICATICNS I i 1 Q ',*, .. O

~,

tt!" i 53% .3 ^1? at; 4%g FEMA Evaluat insi of.Ll'80 te opusse I[ fX ) the Evacuation Route spotters, i and immediately report tag road tapediments or other problems to abe Traffic Control t.e-ordinator sad toed legistica Coordtaator (see OFIP 3.6.3, Sec. S.6.7). tead Traffic Guides (at the staging arsae) are to toport any nackdent that has the poteattat for slowlag the evacuatten based on reporte ] from Traffic Culdes in the field to the Traffic Control rotat Coordinator in the LERO EOC (Otir 3.6.3, sec. 5.3.6). l upon notification ef. a road .] impedteemt from the gvecuat toa toute Coord! aster, the Road tagletice Coordinator la re-sposalble for ensuring that as adequate number of suitable road creu eehicles are dia-patched to respond to the tapediment (see Orlf 3.6.3, sec. S.S.l0). The plan modification ede-quately eJdresses the teouse ratead in the esercies. Effec-1 teve use of t hese pies modtil-catione should be evaluated at . -e f et wee eue ret ee n -- r .d* UCU .3 E~3 R :: 1

gg
    • 2

==g ..$ h M. FEMA Evaluat ion of.LESO Response 3I a The plan has been modified to g g T.* tactude mattitcattee of the 3% Long Island t,stiread (LIRS). iM Frecedure Ortr 3.3.2, rege 4 of U$ attachment 4 lastructs the t.tt) Beep nee (acTips) Support Services twardinator to coatect the Llut at t he Ale r t, I the proccdtre will be 9/i/46 Planning provtsions are ad-or higher emergency closelfica-modifttd la Rev. $ to equate. LERO should obtain stoa, and to request closure of include a phaea call a letter of understanding parts of the estaline if evac-

s the 8.lat.

LERO from LIRR. I are called for la t rsintag will be modt- ! untions certain sectore. fled acestdingly. fN Figure 3.3.4 specif ten that the i trag Island Battroad will be APERTURE -ttited.. t w site area w r-gamey and/or General Emergency hhh RC14. The List should also be added to Fig. 3 3.3 and to the notificetton disgree shown in Fig. 3.3.S. These planalog M 80 A.vailalile On era'tataaa ar*

  • das aca 6<

point of coatect and tatophone g gAperture Card .u er io, e tifscation of the appropriate Lits c'^ '(a) should be documente u..e a letter of understandtag between LERO sad the long taland tail-30 -l\\ road. Traletag of LERO per-i e'*ia''- 00010 of c.t _i-im sweid 6e ~-

9w. N, DATA ANA!.Y (12mNTIO4 CI*ITD MO KUIFICATIWS IN IDO (DRESFOODO P1:MA OfftNr STAR 15 AS SUPK*r POR EX 50.A P3rrmSE:S 6 TFAINING AS i -0I 7 m 'i E%1 at, "oS w5 o j, E ,P5A-AHLA Si (Jobesured door Irra4 event to training conten-PSA Guard Post I now as-at fire ehcope on east side tion. Facts do nut implicate signed responsibility for AucA Th of buildiriu a training flaw. LERO securing the entrance. procedure modified. de un te i - 8Ia si: 0 vv$

g
"t LE ggy 25A-ARCA-9; I ns t r uc t ioris Minor, isolated instance not LERO Staging Area Manage-Ay A Th to a Dus Driver to proceed indicative of pervasive flaw ment Tabletop Dr,ill III and !

Co to the Reception Center in training program. Training Transportation Tabletop u sere not properly trans-has been modified. Drill (Rev. May, 1986) em-gg mitted at DNL tranfers phasize t r a lr.ing of Trans-molnt for Point Coordinators to g, follow staging area direc-g tions in insti uc t ing Dus Drivers. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Sessica 9, " Transportation Coor dina t ion" and " Pro-tactive Actions for Special Populations" (Rev. July, 198G) now emphasize the proper destinations for Bus Drivers. 3. ~ 3 e_ U": $E* stg we u g

  • g o <M 6

l-w rs A - p H t A lu Hesidences of Irrelevant to training conten-LERO is evaluating maps for aucg g b ome perhuns were difficult tion. FEMA recommended Driv-clarity and if warranted 3, 'or Dr iver b to find era be provided more detailed will include utility pole maps and descriptions of pick numbers f or mar k t rig pick up c up points.

points, w

u.*

BY llAC IN REVIW OP LIIID f 6 8 M UIFICATIQG. PAC it.VIIM & ID O VDOATIM RAC ANA1.YSIS lvuotATIM IN sw: sevIm a_mncAfroe w sevs 7 6 e amIrzcATIcts g -~ l O~ OS"

=*

13 E: 1:3 l 2P" jdi. 4%F mo geo $Resevnoe (ACTION) u ggg4 g,,,,,gg,,,g gg,gg g,,,,,,, ], ,gy f eres of building 9/1/86 Adequately address the es-proceseres for security and A 1 s is being re-ercise issue, energenc/ utilization of the ud. A guard will Lit.C0 Fetc6 ue District Office 3 posted at etw as t he LERO ratchogue 5tesing (3ne t ed locatton Area have been modified in Ortr i the facility 4.7.8 to adequately address ow le completed. this esercles tesue. The effectiveness of these plan modification should be evalu-sted et a future esercise. ,..,O a** c wo-y~. = [53 53 .5 0 % %b EE" e$ u D Respunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evalualion el,LERO Response EC .M l The LERO response that Transfer Trenefer Point 9/1/86 Adequately address the es-A 1 rdinature' training ercise lasue. ' Point Coordinator training arlal will be modi-wili be modified is adequate. ) to ensure they The

  • 8f,rtivenees of thio

)y instructions training eSould be evaluated at 3 the SAC's to t i.e a future esercise. drivers. TI APERTURE CARD w g Also Available O~n 5 T. e ". ~0 = Aperttire Card

s 2'

11 2 '" =yg u 0 Response (ACTION) pggg g,dg,,gg,,,g gggg ge, pun,, j mape used to find 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-i.ERO's response is adequate. A 1 to in the EFZ will orcise lasue. The maps seed to identify non-reviewed for institutionettaed mobility- 'Ity, impaired should be provided to FEMA for esamf .as sad their ettectiveness m ouse be evalu- .ted.t. futufe e.orci... 87090)0330 4

CONTENilON E x.. ' %gg. LERO FAILED TO TRAIN PERS ANO IMPLE%ENT ITS PLAN 1 DATA ANAIMj TINTIN CITID AIO 70DIFICATIQG IN 1130 g SESIGODM TDIA (IMtNT STA2tl5 AS SUPPOl@ FOR EK 50.B PFCOEUIES & 'IPAINING g pg _33 Not admitted 35 Not admitted y 3b Insporopriate pro-Factually baseless. LERO fol-ggtlwn actton recommenda-lowed applicable procedures. ine (wind shift) FEMA Report at 33. i J7: P utsettve Action pt.wnind s tions THot sepa- )t e l y Cdmitted but incor- ) rated. list o subpart 1 of 3 15) Failure to eatend PARS Irrelevant to training conten- ] yond 10 mile EP2 tions. Factually baseless. LERO followed applicable pro-cedures. FEMA Report at 33. )try animals ~~Id. No PARS for o t heir than l No PA9h conterning M. Ster and food i Fallus e to cumplete inconsequential. Actual data Found depobition worksheet were available su completion of an estimation worksheet was unnecessary. 3 38: Public Information gg,_ a ENC delayed in opening: Factually baseless, ENC pf I 3 loformation until first activation was timely. See g*w 3=s conference at 0840 FEMA Report at 52 LILCO is-

gg u w sued press releases at 0625 jgyJ snd 0639.

g First newb seledse de-Factually baseless: trrelevant Essential emergency infor-p i Oyed sud indtourate to training. Inf orma t t osi was mation summarized and }NC-D-l: Insufficient timely provided. Equipment transmitted via computer Spying capabilities re-problem, not training, caused frem the EOC to ENC and all utted in delays in distri-delays in distributing updated rumor control locations st-stion of information) information. New procedures r.iu t t aneous l y. Additional and better copying capability copying equipment (total of should obviate problem. 5 machines) ensures sufft-cient capability in event of unanticipated machine failure.

EfL To pOLLOW 3 PMCEDtCES D BY HAC IN HEVISd & l.!!1D 9 6 0 KUD'1CATIGE, PE HLVIDd & IEPO VL14BATIM PAC Analysis > Vr.MtATIM IN RAC MNIW K EIFICATIO S & IENS 7 & 8 KDIFICATICNS o 1 *. i . :~. US~ 8 "I 01 0%3

s
st ER3 Arspente ( ACTioul

,.EMA Evaluation ul.LERO Desponse II E u bpying machines in 8/8/86 Reserved dec.istosi bdsud ott The plan has been modiflad to 1 I

CD ENC are being fact that LERO had not ywt create en addittoaal position.

)vslutttd for upgraJe decided to upgrade copyin9 LEmo spokesperson, and addt-d replacement se capabilities, tional staff have been sesigned Dcessary. to secure better coordination of information in the Esec. The lo seder to ' espedite 6/19/86 LERO spokesperson is respone- )lesest act ice of In" tble for coordtaating the re-

breatisa, procedures lease of information working la res besa revloed.

conjunction with the~ County lessat ist emergency Esecutava or his designes, if Ja.f arr;ct ion will be he choosee to participate. The Zt in gammary fore LERO opokesperson wi!! repte-sleu t t aneously sent 1180 et prese conferences. i 3rcseelsted wis com-prese rolesses are to be die-Zter to the Etsc and t otWted to utility, government

t t rumor control l

end media pereonne; et the ENC. )gc:eion2. f{ As provided in oply 3.8.1, Sec. 3 2.4, changes la important ) g', emergency information will be I electronically transmitted to {# g Rumor Control District offices and call boarde via TSO print-out (also see oply 3.8.1, sec. S.3.4). Also AvriHeMe Op Li'co la attil

    • e t==< tas t h-lack of hard copy capablitty b IO b,d for distribution of Ess messages to the press in the ENC.

Until LILCO coepletes the r,.luation of thle equipment ter providing hard copies of ERS messages to the media, the respones to thle eserclee leeue le rated inadeguate. 8709010330 -

(% 1ATA ANW QDf!1Nfl(Di CT!1D AND EDIFICATICDS IN IDO C coseassoonc mm Cueext srA2US AS SUPKar 70ft EK 50.3 pmE 6 'linINDG ' AS S'S

Second news rulease de-

~~Id. ~~Id. }cysd (ENC-D-ts Insuffl* Bient copying capabilities Patuited in delays in dis- )ribution of Information) D' losutticient copying Irrelevant to training. Id. $apstal l i t y at ENC delayed Equ i pa.=n t problem caused de-Dist ribut ion of information lays-in distributing updated } ENC-D-la 'usufficient information. New procedures $opying ca allities re-and better copying capability )ulted in sys in distri-should obviate problem. Dut t on of formation) -0 IS EV y

  • t

..30 ~. Eo A8CA 3: Insufficient / inadequate Irrolevant to training. Facts The suggested displays and Deps and displays based on equipment deficiency. status boards have been (ENC-ARCA-2: Insufficient provided to the ENC. maps and displays) .! ? t;h 5 a:)

EB5 message contained Minor and corrected b) evi-Press Release procedures

^#CO ostraneous information stons in LERO procedures and have been modified. CBS l@ ENC-ANCA-3: EDS messages followup training. messages will no longer be dontained entraneous infor-released. The Coordinator .mstion)- of Public Information pre-pares press releases using an established format. The Director of Local Response approves it. The LERO Spokespesson directs dis-tributlutt to t his media. LERO Pubtic Information Group Personnel receive training in the new proce-dures in the LERO Public Information Tabletop Dritt (Rev. N o v., 1986). ma* w.o

D BY RAC IN IeV!W T 1.11ID 7 & 8 EITICATICNS, IUC fe/IW & IIlO VERBATIM RAC App M SIS } VEleMIM IN DAC IEVIW KVIFICATIC3s & IENS 7 6 8 KDIFICATICNS ) is. 1 i

e. O.-

^l o ^ ,5~ '000 "E 3~= g;g 13; g: oa LER3 Keepunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of LERO Seppunse II kuI m The suggested displays and A 1 i .The suggested s< tdt-9/l/86 Adequately address the en. ercise lasue, statue boarde are to be posted ltlanal displays and in the briefing race. geo plan l status basede utl4 be revletone are necessary to i providsd to the ENC. address thle esercles teous. The use sad effectiveness of the additional Er1 nap to track i FARs and plume path and the use end effectiveness of the Ect. Statue Board should be evalv-sted at a future esercles. I 1

    • ,, -~s; o

1 'O U U l c ~. g, Y..: co- . h. g g-IIE g ..I lea 3 Brspunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of.LEAO Seepunse If I Thi emergency press 9/l/86 The plan modifications ade- .The plan hee been modifled. A 1 releasse, uhtch do not quately address the emer-OrlF 3.8.1 Sec. S.4.4 to esatsta deleted mate-Cise lasua. require the LERO Spokesperoom rial, will be posted to have e staff member dia-ts.the ENC. tribute hard copies of correct press rolessee (E45 eeenages) uhtch have been received wie TI ti.e Tm.,et e.. The plan modification ade-p g quotely address the esercise U-tesue. 'Treintag of FIO etaff et the EseC should be evaluated at a f uture eserclee to ensure that entreaeous taformation b0 b# f ree Ets message draf te le not Aperture Cerd ined "taattF s* van ta iha media. 8709 010 3 30 - /y

IATA ANAL . 03fn2frKN CInD AND EDIFICATICNS IN IDO CD503IOODG EDIA CUPMNr STA2US AS SUPIORF ICR EX 50.8 wmsrHES 6 'IRAINING As Gs Press releases Dupilcative of Contention (see EX 38.B above) lata / inaccurate (ENC-D-l EX 38.C. Irrelevant to insufficient copying caps-training. Information was bilities resulted in delays timely provided. Equipment in distribution of informa-problem caused delays in tion) distributing updated informa-tion. New procedures and bet-ter copying capability should obviate problem. t (H Evacuation ductston re-Id. (see EX 38.8 above) ' por t ed 40 media too late I (ENC-D-la Insufficient copying capabilities re-sulted in delays in distri-bution of information) Is Medte equested not to Factually baseless. In accor-Inf or m putil ic of LERO dance with LERO procedures workerm' ingestion of KI media were never briefed about LCRO workers' KI ingestion. J ENC personnel unable to Factually baseless. Facts do provide information to not demonstrated a failure to medias unable to contact provide the media information. Marketino Evaluations K Not admitted. L: ENC log falsely todl-Enercise events do not impil-cated gravel truck impedt-cate deficiency in training. ment waa balng removed The inaccurate inf or mat ton was not released to the public or the media. Ms LNL peemonnel could not Factually baseless. LERO answer quentluns about im-spokesperson reported essen-pediment tlal details including loca-tion of road blockage and rerouting of traffic. Na ENC mlbstated facts Insignificant, isolated errors about (l) when Emergency during a whole day's worth of was declarud (0823 correct public information do not es-time was 0019). (2) EPZ tablish a training problem, winter v t.. hummer popula-tion 0: Delayed delivery of Onsite functions irrelevant to (see EX 38.B above) press releases 4 and 5 to training. Media Moni t oe-ing Media Monitoring (LNC-D-13 receives information through Insufficient copying capa-EDS messages, does not have bilities resulted in delays immediate need for news re-1.i distribution of informa-leasas. Equipment problem tion) caused delays in distributing updated information. New pro-cedures and better copying ca-pability should obviate prob-lem. pi Rumor Control operation Duplicative of Contention ineffective as described in EX 39. Contentlon EX 39 Q: t ERO modif icat ions irrelevant to training, would be inodequate t o rem-Conclusory allegation not edy " deficiencies" based on Exercise events. vsa

.. - -.. _ =. -. - - _ _ -. -. _. - _. _ _.. _. _. -. -. _, _ - _ - - - - _ ./ / BY RAC IN EV13W Or t.,In L1tD VENWPIM IN NAC MhIgW . NTIM RAC.ANM.YSIS NE.7 & O MUIFICAT10NS gy - = = >.. 1,IC m. l. (see EX 38. 8 ). (see EX 38.8) (see EX 38.8) ( TI. APERTURE CARD i - Also Available On Aperture Card 8709010330-/7 1

%w 1ATA arf CUf!UITICH CI'llD AND KDIFICATIOG IN LDO C0f4ESPOODC FU4A 01t42ff STAnlS AS SUProie Km CC 50.B Plot 27xM:S 6 TRAINING AS F G 39: so m.u s Control

Csil Suar d Operat or s Onsite function.

Irrelevant (see Ex 38.0 above) Od instcurate/ outdated to LERO trainings factually afurmattuns answered in-baseless. The few instances eiries too slowly or in-of s upe r s etf e d information re-Crr ect ly (ENC-D-li insuf-suited from an equipment prob-icicnt copying capabili-lem. New procedures and bet-IGS et ENC resulted in de-ter copylng Capability should Oy3 in distributing infor-obviate problem. Dtlun to Rumur Control Orconnst) ): Late tesponses to simu-Onsite function. Irrelevant Oted aumus messages to training conclusory and factually baseless. Rasponses to messages were as empedt-tious as accuracy would allow. Personnel acted according to procedures. Humor Lun t i u l purbonnel Onsite function. Irrelevant (see Ex 38.B ebove) Dr ov idad inatru-to training. Information pro-cts / super buded informat10n vided was generally timely and ! ENC-D-1: Insufficient correct. Isolated instances

cpy ing capabilities at ENC of inaccurate information were "Ocultcd in delays in based primarily on an

)totributIng information to equipment problem. New proco-umu t <cnte01 perkunnel) dures and better copying caps-bility should obviate problem. ix 44: (1st sentence con-Irrelevant to training. Fac-iolldnted with Ex 30 and tually baseless. Emercise !x 39): failure to provide events do not support allega-3ccurota, clear information tion of substantial evacuation Jould create a substantial shadow. ]vecustton " shadow" @ 22F; Fothe assumption irrelevant to training. Df no peemature evacuation Conclusory allegation not based on Esercise events. }M 41: le of f it Impediments 1: Slow mobilization of irrelevant not a training So%d Crews problem. Factually baseless. Sufficient Road Crews were mo-bilized in accordance with proceduras. O! d' 2: D Da Failure to respond ade-Duplicative of Contentions Traffic Engineer added to Lustely to two road impedt-Ex 42,8 and Ex 45.A. Facta do EOC. LERO Traffic Control ments: (l) Communications not demonstrate a pervasiva Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May. Gallures at EOC (EOC-D-1: training flaw. Isolated in-1986) and PAR / Accident M a r. - Delsys in responding to two stances of communciallons agement Tabletop Drill 111 Dvccustion impediments) problems readily corr ect able (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasize by revisions in LERO proce-responding to evacuation dures and training. Impediments includinD com-munication of information, equipment requirements. re-sponse priorities. and al-ternate traffic routing. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-sion 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July. 1986) empha-sizes communication of in-formation and timely re-sponse to evacuation Imped-w e %=w iments.

J.YEED BY RAC IN IEVIDd & IJIID ENS 7 & 8 MDIFICATIOS. DAC Rt. IDd & I D O V13EETIM RAC MELYSIS V TmD VE34WTIM IN RAC itV. IfW - KDIFICATIOS & IENS 7 & 8 KDITICATICNS (see EX 38.8) s (beu EX 38,0) ~ a* w Q** 30 n 6 .i 2." 03-4.3 a 1:1 .e : 3

13. A"

-=- .~ M A$ EE* 'el 1 .t'a3 teepunge (Actical) l'EMA Evaluat ion of 1.Eko Scapunse IE .k O I 6 P as hee been revised to A 1 Precedures have been S/26/86 Adequately address the is-The l revisued and reviend sues telsed in the emer-add a traf fic engineer to the to sneure.taformation

cise, staff et the EOC to evaluate en tapedimente to any possible 8mpediments to promptly passed to all

(( evacuation and to aske recue-i , sis.so,oso ~i sa astion. o..u. seer,ch.n.se l APERTURE 1 t-e..,ain.ta,ee,onee to otenttei.. di-i it,ir.o .d. i addi-res,ones mente. Procedures for field {

tiss, a

Traffic g' Enginest has been

workere, i.e.,

bene drivere. 1 sodid to the LEta F.DC traffic guides, etc., have been sagit to oestet in modified to include lastrec-( Also AvaUabic 0# evalurttag and cations through tvett commual-d nsicptag alternate resting. Aperhtre Card catio. aeteori of ear e teatian The Traffic Guidance S/26/86 Impedime nt. Provietone have TIbl= Top YT-6 hee been made to teaue en Ett .aif ia to .ees.ge i. th. e.e.t th.t changte to the pro-Q, changes to evacuation reintes StetrPorate the are necessary. MM

Q-4 DATA ANA MIJIFICATIOG IN IJ30 3 ' 03r;'.2tr1W CJM AfD GNR:SIGOING FEMA CCttt2Tf ST.A2US AS SUPIORT FOR EX 50.B PKX2:DUa0S & UAINDG AS S' O( us c- .2 E{ (2) Deldy in field Minor and readily currected by LERO Traffic Control proce-gr' varititattun of fuel truck revisions in LERO procedures dures have been revised to lopediment (LOC ARCA-9; and training. empedite dispatch of Daley in field verification personnel responding to in-of fusi truck impediment) cldents identified by the EOC. LERO field personnel now receive training with increased emphasis on re-sponses to evacuation im-pediments. Modifications have been made in: (1) LERO l Evacuation Route Spotter Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May, 1986); (2) LERO Staging Area Management l Tabletop Drill III (Rev. l May, 1986): (3) LERO Traf-fic Control Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May, 1986): (4) LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986). w %r

./ uYrim EY HAC IN EVIAM & IJIID EVB 7 6 8 90DIFICATIOC. PAC REVID4 & 1450 Or 7 8 CATICNS mD W35tATIM Di IWC EVIDd M IFICATIO S I laterset communteetione withis the LERO NOC regarding essese-esas of and response to evacue-ties impediments beve been edequately eJdressed through eadtiteetten to the procedures (esp. Ortr 3.6.3. Traf fic Con-trol). The tvecuation Beute coordinetur le re e Ponsible for .bt eleing per tu.ile updates f rom the Evocession Route Spotters, and immediately reportseg road impediments or other probleme to the Traffic Control Co. ordinator and Reed logistice Coordiastor (see Orir 3.6.3, Sec. S.6.7). 8 mod Traffic Cuideo (at the staglag erase) are to report any tecident that hee the potentist for elouing the evacuation based on reports from Traffic Caldee la the fleid to the Traffic Control rotat Coordinator le the 8.580 Eoc (OrlP 3.6.3, Sec. $.3.6). Upon notification of a road tapediment from the Evacuation toute Coordinator, the Road 84gtetics Coordinator le re-spessible for esauring that en adequate number of outtable road crew vehicles are dio-patched to respond to the lepediment (see OrtF 3.6.3, Sec. 5.5 10). The plan modiftestton ede-gestely eJdresses the

1. sues a

coloed in the esercles. Effec-tive use of theos plan modif t-catione shuuld be evaluated at n -f et wew-*se ret een qu 2C .d U"* l1 a3-

2. :. a.

%C3 - - ~ 1I " ?, 3 'r I I a o 1.En3 Respunse ( ACTiDN) ITMA Evaluetium uf LERO Seepunne 4 c, &o$ u ig .= - o rruesdures and trela-9/1/46 Adequately address tias en-The ples hee been modified ($ee A g ing will be revised to ercise issue. OrtP 3.6.3 Sections 3.1, 5.2.4 entow flealbtitty in and 5.4.2), to eseure that ett pero 6tnet somignacnt. lopediaants to evacuation will ] be promptly

reported, that This will ensure t hat

. addittomet pereoanet are die-peru nnel are immedt-APERTURE ! esteha se e e, edited enner. stsly dispatched for 1: pediment vertitee-i and that there le coordinettoa MRD i ' i sea ih vreisse c tr i c - a tsa or other erscus-tion saigency; ordinator, the Evacuation Coor-dinator and the Evacuation Bo6te Coordiastor. The Evacue-1}gg fggg g tion Soute Coordiastor is resposalble for obtaining peri. fAperture Cud ate vedeies fro-i.eeustion Route Spotters ($ee Oeir 3.6.3, Section S.6.7). The plan modi-I ficatione edequately addreae ' the esercles teaue. The effectiveness of treintag of 8709010 0- d 's"i** di stor sad co-uairatione tik Soute Spottere via Stagtag Arese should be evaluated ut a future esercles. m.

j J DAq G NIDfr1(N CI*ltD M O ' IODIFICATICIEi IN N QMESKt0DG FDR (IPet2ff STKIU3 AS SLPPORT POIt EK 50.5 N '4IS &'19AINING i D t w. ' U. 8 Z' 2 (3) appropriate Factually baseless. Personnel LERO Traffic Centrol Tab-At C/stsuunst not dispatched to and equipment required to letop Drtli V (Rev. Nay, remove multiple vehicle ac-clear blocked road woro sent 1986) emphaslaes communica-cidsnt road impediment to accident. Facts do not tion directly between the (PSA-AHCA-62 Appr opr i a t e demonstrate a training flaw. EOC and Road Crews to en~ psrsonnel not dispatched-Any problems were minor and sure appropriate response, I tu clear multiple vehicle readily correctable by revi-accident eoad impediment) stons in LERO procedures and LERO Classroom Training training. Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Control" trains traffic control pere sonnel, including Road Crews, to communicate by radio with the Road Logis-tics Coordinator at the EOC. t I I I i l l 1 Cg' Not admitted. ] Da Hot admitted.

Es Aths i t ion ut Traffic En-Irrelevant to training.

lgineer to LOL would not Conclusory allegation not !allminate tnews in dealing based on Enercise events. lwith road impediments ) QX 22il_,jdvalt with under Id. Ox 41) Erroneous assump-tlon that LERO needs to be able to deal with only two j road impediments ] GX 42 (Seben Incorporated

tn EX 30 & Ex 39) iO Untimely / ineffective Duplicative of Contentions (see EX 48.8 above) response to road impedl*

EX 41.B and EX 45.A. ( l cants (EOC-O-It Delays in _j l responding effectively to ! road inmediments) f l ) I Ww

s /' S AlW.Y3fD BY HAC IN leVIDi & LIIID. ItNS 7 6 d 90DIFICATICD6, pac Hgyrad & lao VDtBATIM RAC ANALYSIS C9 S'1901!D VisetATIM IN 84AC IOf1Di KDIFICATIOg & M 7 & S E WICATIQ6 ~ a 8 . J,.,E. i = t'? = l 7"$a ati %%g bl LERO t.asponse ( ACTION) FE8tA Evalualion of. LEA 0 Seepense II f h y, u .m 2 After sued crews are N/A Adequately address the es-LERO's response to adequate to A 1 dispitched to their arcise issue, address the issue of inappro-Palase equipacnt being sent to fleid positions they 8espond to the tapediment communicate via radio problem introduced in the euer-with the EOC. The clee. plan revisions made in Isad Traf fic Cuides at reePonee to deficiency 1.ERO EOC the Staging Aree de 1 I abould be sufficient to en-stut decide which sure timely resposee to evaces-trucks are to be dio-tion impediments. procedure pstched to a partico. OrtF 3.6.3, Sec. S.S.10 has tar freed'sment. been added and now ashes clear that once dispatched from their prestaged location to respond l to en impediment probles. road crews are to be la radio con-tact with the EOC. The Road Crew procedure (Attach. 2 of Ortr 3.6.3, Sec. 6, page 2 of , 2) specifies ' that Road Crews are to contact the Road legistics Coordinator et the EOC ti problems arise. The effectiveness and 8.ERO worker knowledge of these procedures eheuld be evaluated at a f uture ..erc... i l l TI l APERTURE CARD Also Avahble On Aperture Carel (see Ex 41.B) (8709010330 -[% w

\\ l DA (DfnNTICH CInD NO OIFICATICa6 IN D:HD l c20er.100DG lutA cMcfr STARE AS SUPK*T la EX 50.B PPittES & TPAINING c= i ~ 0k I i Ob l z1 G: Untimely / inadequate re-Duplicative of Contention LERO procedures modified to gg eponse to Ridue School Ex 45.0, Factually baseless. ensure additional staff are evccussion message Dispatch of bus 33 minutes used to assist the Special (PSA-ARCA-Ils Forty minute after receipt of request at Populations Bus Dispatcher, daley in dimpetthing Bus PSA was timely under circum-LERO Classroom Training ma-Driver to evecuate school

stances, terials for Session 9

" Transportation (childeen) Coordinator" and " Pro-I l tactive Actions for Special Populations" emphaslZe need l for assistence in expediting special popula-tion buses. Transportation i Tabletop and Staging Area i Management Tabletops also emphasize this. 2 n 5al [d lC: Inabiltty to handle un-Duplicative of Contention

espected eumusa EX 39.

g; Da inebtt6ty ot fratfic Readily correctable by revi-LERO Classroom Training 43 Guides tu respond to slons in the LERO procedures Program materials for

evacuee questtons and training.

Session 8 " Traffic Control"

(PSA-ARLA-7 Traffic (Rev. July, 1986) now
Guldes let ked tumplete in-tratna Traffic Guides to

' f o r reie t t on on the approprl-instruct evacuees to listen eta destinattun for to the EBS radio station for evacuation information

ovocuses including evacuation desti-nations.

LERO Identifica-tion Badge for Traffic Guides, listing job-related duties on the back, instructs them to advise evacuees to listen to the EBS station. l Ww

[ 4NAINErD BY RAC Di IEVLled & !.IIAD m s 7 s 8 w oIricATIons, RAc sev. ra# w too ViseATm aAc ANAL.vsts 3 smTio veleaTIM In anc wvane notricATIcss & Juvs 7 & 8' wmIrIcATIONS 3 =- .5" OUO i .2 l s.: x. t:s x:3 .s i. :. 31 1 =gg LES) Brspunse ( ACTICII) FEMA Evelvet ion of 1.E30 tesponse Ij uI The plan hee been modified in A I Rvvielee 8 will be 9/l/86 Adequately addrehm the e.- restead to indicate en orcise issue. Ortr 3.6.S. Sec. S.S.2. to in-additlecal 11.20 staff struct the Special Popsistione percon will oestet the Sus ptopeccher to assign a Special populettone Tronefer Point Coordinator to seatst in briefing drivers to sus $ttpetcher. eseure a more timely dispatch. These plan modifications which odequately address the eneretse teoue should be evaluated at a future esercise. - ~_- qc O

  • E

~. S~ c.- g.-

t. u. s,

[g att M[ hg LESS Besponse ( Actions) FEMA Evolust ion of.LE30 Seepenee 3I The Traf fic Culde Fro-9/l/86 Adequately address the en-The plan hee been modified. A I cedure will be modt. ercise issue. Ortr 3.6.3 Attac hent 1.

see, itse in Sev. 8.

10 to instruct the tretite guides to infore evacuees to listen to the EBS redte station for the latest emergency in-formation. The plan modtiteetten ede-J quotely address the esercise tesse. The knouledge of traffic guides to lastruct evacuees to listen to the ESS Stetton for inforestion should rr1 w eveiusted at a future APERTURE CARD Also Available On A erture Card i P i 8709010330 -I9 4 i

O ONMNTICW C11TD Af0 M]Dir!CATIO45 IN I430 CDtleSIODING FIDE GMeff STARE AS SLPIMF KWt EX 50.D PpnrmagS 6 NNDeG I s _2 D. (cont.) Inability of facts do not demonstrate a Traffic Guides now wear C Traffic Guldes to know en- . pervasive flaw in LERO LERO Identification Badges cess dose authorization training program. Minor. Iso-enumerating radiological procedure (PSA-ARCA-16: lated incidents readily cor-procedures on the back for Traffic Guldes did not un-rectable by revisions in LERO quick reference in the darstand emcess dose autho-equipment and training, field. The Dadge clearly states that they will re-rization procedures) calve authorization for en-cess esposure from the Lead Traffic Guide. Escess dose authorization procedures are now emphasized in re-vised LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dostmetry and Esposure Con-trol" (Rev. July. 1986). l l l ~7 l I I __b Et Some bus drivers failed LERO procedures and training Bus Drivers are now as-l to chrry out their assigned have been modif ied to ensure signed routes randomly in ' duties (PSA-D-6: Bus driv-that every Bus Driver is capa-order to familiarize them ! ers delayed, went to wrong ble of driving any randomly with a variety of routes transfer point. or missed assigned route. they might be called on to segment of assigned route) drive. Transfer Point Coordinators now check bus dispatch forms upon Driver's arrival to confirm that the Driver is at the correct transfer point. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 9 " Transportation Coordination" (Rev. July. 1986), the Transportation Tabletop (Rev. May. 1906) and the Staging Area Man-agement Tabletop (Rev. May. 1980) emphasize that Bus-Drivers report to the Transfer Point Coordinator for verification of the Bus Dispatch Form to ensure that the Driver is at cor-rect location. Bus Driver Driving Instruc-tion Training (Rev. May. 1986) emphasizes the new verification procedures. The session includes a Road Rally in which each Driver runs a route to designated check locations, hl

/ 5 = vim.y c =

n. or 1.rtm -

sac novrant w meem sac mamsts asw 7 6 s wmIrIcelos. ><=xcwxa. smo

== 2 * * -a

-io t-m.,mc =vt. .3: ice ' ~l l-x- lt i um tig It . KE p};t g u.0.ee,.uns. (.CT. ) v.i.ti of u .ee - se a3 a se, ,.tc we .t.,in, w. u.0. r.. - e.

i. e ques..

i Aree itse 13. Stace the isse-a relates to training of emergency workers regarding esposere

control, LERO'a comet teent. to empheeise this espect in its training to reopenelve.

The effectiveness of LE.0's emergency werber redlelegical espeoure concret trainlag should be oveleeted at a future eseretee. "O O 2$' es-n t*y t.1 1 - ~ 2" et g I xt i g ** LER3 Besponse ( ACTION) FEMA Evolues lee of l.280 Response i.l. s Eoj LER 'a investigetton 8/1/96 Adequately address the is-The plan hee been revir.ed, Ortr i suas raised in the emer-3.6.4, Sec. S.S.4 3, to require af the problem re. veelse that during cise. the bue drivers to show their psst drille bue drl-Diepesch Form to the Transfer vers have repeatedly Point Coordinator se, assure valuateered to su to that the drtvere have reached the same trenefer the correct locetten. This palats and bue yards. verification of arrival at the Ws, they had not desired trenefer point to else beccee festlier with covered in the Transfer reint the other pose 8ble Coordinator's Precedure lacstions. LIL(B will (Attachment I, sec. 7 of Ortr run " road rallies

  • to 3.6.4).

hsee the ' bus drivene feattlerire theneelves These plan modificettene ade-with other bus yarde quotely address the esercise i.su.e and. wid me eveiusted ..d t,.nete,,ointe. TI et a future eserci. In the future, emer-APERTURE ,re,. red.eee t relatg ' will force CARD tha esse of different transfer pointe end bus-yards. 'The Transfer Point Coor-dinstur Procedure 'ull! Also AvaMaMe On Indicate that bue die- 'Anerture Card pstch forme ese to be r checked upuo driver's .errival, in Rev.-7. ] 87 09 01 n 3 3 0

2. 0 m

_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -

  • k N DM M 1

C (INnWrl(M CI'MD APO DCIMFICATICMS IN IJ20 l' CINUESPOODC FFMA (17952Q STA2tC AS SLFf0RF FWL IDC 50.5 PRX3l[UES 6 '!1tAINING AS IPHI SIa U :- hf a: o F traf t lt Guides arrived F ac t ua l l y "ca s e l e s s. Traffic Traffic Guides are now D ( l late at Luntson points Guides critical to a con-prestaged for inm ed i a t e C '(RSA-D-2: Traffic Gufde trolled evacuation manned dispatch within the 0-2 ( dstoyed in ar riving at con-their posts in a timely mile EPZ upon emergency [ ts ul points) fashion. Irrelevant to declaration. LERO Traffic 0 issue. Any problem Control Tabletop Drtli V c (tralning as procedural. Procedures (Rev. May, 1986) and c have been modified. Staging Area Management ( Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) emphasize prestaging and rapid deployment of Traffic Guides in 0-2 mile EP2. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for 5es-slon B " Traffic Control" (Rev. July, 1986) empha-i sizes pre-equipping and pre-assigning of Traffic Guides. ~ 8 I^h i mU iMS e. .i a:s t F. (Lun.tl Dom tir t ver s not irrelevant to t ra in t rag issue. LERO Classroom Traininu ARCA 9 idispatched in timely Drivers were dispatched ac-Program materials for ( fashtun (PSA-ARCA-1: Bus cording'to procedures. Prob-Session 9 " Transportation ( Idriverm not dispatched lem rotated to quantity af Coordination" (Rev. July. ( until 2 housb after emer-Acelned oersonnel available to 1986) non emphasizes that ( 'Dsney declaration) u t es i s t Dispatcher in distribu-Transfer Point Coordinator tion of dostmetry. FEMA < rec-assist Bus Dispatchers with i ommended additional personnel distribution of materials be provided to assist in bus and dosimetry in order to dispatching. Bus dispatch enpedito dispatch of Bus procedures have been modified Drivers. to provide additional help. The Transportation Tabletop and Staying Area Management Tabletop Drills (Rev. May. 1986) emphaalJe need for assistance in rapid dis-patch of buses. Dostmetcy I Tabletop Drill VI (Rev. Nov. 1986) emphasizes need for rapid distribution of dostmetry to large groups such as Bus Drivers, i I l ww

BY IW' IN EVIIM CF IJIIn f 7 & 8 MODIFICATIONS. RAC pfVI}M & W O VEREATDi BAC ANALYSIS VEHilATDI IN RM EVIBd MJDIFICATIO6 T EVS 7 & B KDIFICATI(NS .c .E*O -u-o x-in" 141 oa3 2:1 -u i 82 sesponse (ACTION) rEr.A E.atu. io..I.t.zmo mese. nee lll j .a: af fic Culdee wMi be S/26/86 Adequately address the Is-n>dification of proceduree Ortr A i e-equipped for imme-sues reised in the emer-3.6.3 sad Orly 4.5.1 to tieruit die dispatch for the cise. et least three (3) non-essigned elle Er2. An addi-traffic guides to seeist is the snal person will be distribution of field kite is algued to seslot adequate to address thle eser-th equipeet:,t distri-cies leave. tion. ? i ) ... m ~'

5. ~

,~ c -u-oo r x-in: %%1 "3 3 %

e. F a

.C a. l. E

==a o CAO Bespunse (ACTION) FEMA Evaluet isa of.LE30 8esponse I$ '!hh u JY.-,,,,,,. wre is no require-N/A Reserved decision pendin9 FEMA and the RAC have reviewed g g at to dispatch bus completion of further modt-additional inforsetton supplied rivere within two flcetion of LERO procedures by LitIO regarding thle toeve ute >f a Site Asse t o es,*s ur e timely briefings and hows c harg,ed the originot ergency. The dio-and distribution of yeting la t.4 report from e atch of bus drivers dossavstry tq 9us Or4 vers. Dettelency to na Area taqwf ring no within the times Corte.rttee Action. An die-vtalled in the LERO a ceased in the esserise tueert, Iss. See snelysis of 4 the deleye in dispecching bue

lapstrh, Attachment drivere were due to "16 e-sing

,f doelmetry and to del 4ge fa !I briefing the o amlar el,yet- / l rp g

sonnel, bus drivere' iand 11 t rene for ' peint, coordinators, 4

e r prior to dispetthlay. FEMA a% recogaises that there le.no requirement within the pies to l CARD di.,.t. bus' dri.ere fro. the i 4 Staging use within two (2) 1 huure of a Site Area Emergency. Ft:."JL 6100 recognises that step dlBO /.Tadalile 011 S.3.4 of Deir 3.6.4 requires the Bus coord t utor (et the Jg eygggg {ggg j j p LEto EOC), as directed by the r. Trenspottatton Suppott Coor-i I dinator, to begin implemente-tion of bue ope rat ione et the 1 $tte Area Emergencyl and that the first buses are to be dis-A\\ patched f rw the Trs^efer / reinte r, <mr then owe ll)' j / hout affer71w ~~ s i ~ vt 87 09 010 3 3 0 _ g,( r as ? J t _{._

l b [ATA ANAI.YZID BY /3 l cunutrial cinD APO KEMFICATIOS IN Um itNS 7 6 6 l capa:sfoonc run asterr STARE AS StPPORr Im n 50.8 Pynnnt:S 6 TRAINDc AS S*mHD VDh i l \\ i 1 I l ) i J v me ' vmo n M----

2T IN iMfilW & LIIID PEI)1FICATICBS. IIAC IW, VIEW & 1230 MTDI IIAC ANAIXSIS &DI IN ItfC IEVIN MIFDTICDg; & IE!lVS 7 & 8 MI)1FICATICN" recommendation to evacuate the public. flowever, the Bue pie-patcher (e) et the Staging Areas are responalble with the asetetence of uncommitted Trenefer Point Coordinator not I already dispatched from ti.e Staging Area (see OFIP 1.6.4, section S.S.8) - for briefing bue drivere and verifyin~g that they are properly equipped with a bene driver packet and dos-leetry. The buses evaluated on the day of the esercise were able to complete their routes within the dine fremse set forth in the plan. Slowever, it 'j is FEMA's judgnent thet the dispatch of bene drivere-from the Staging Areas must be espedited so that buses will be ovellable for dispatch free the transfer pointe to complete their evacuation routes within the pruecribed me freese in all scenerlos. The sue O!a - patcher (s) apparently did not adequately use uncemettted Transfer relat Coordinator in dispatching Sue Drivers free the Staging Arg_(ga _; 33udgC by Section S.S.8 t,f 0 Fir 1.6.4). Based en further analyste of information made svellable by (18,00, PEMA deter-egned that the Evecuation Co-ordinator did not teone instruction to prestage buses to ties Transfer rotete until one hour and twenty minutes after the $tte Asea Emergency wee known to personnel at the 11 80 EOC (see page 86 of 1,lLCO's First Bequest for Adolesione sad Third Set of Interrogatories Directed to Suffolk County, Itew York State, and the Town of Southampton, deced December 1. 1984). This is contrary to section S.I.I of OPIP 5.6.4 which requires the Manager of Local Beepense to direct the Evacuation Coor-dinator to begin the prestoging of buses to sees er all of the Transfer Pointe upos declara-l tion of a $tte Area toergency. Hence. IIRO did not follow the plan (i.e., utilise avellable

  1. [{

I re oureee and/or make use of training) and thle esercise {h N rt1 7 W, remain lesue wilt unresolved aan s. .v, net TV-hh esaure-timely briefinge and l distribution of doelectry under ) all scenarios to the large number of bue drivers required Also AvaHalile On to h-dispatch d tra-the Patchogue Staging Area. The Aperture Card e,,ectiveness of and t,sinin, in these plan modifications should be evaluated at a future esercise. 8709 010 3 30 - W I li

s DATA ANALYi 03f!1NTI(N CITED AND KOIFICATIOS IN IHO ye, CORRESP0t0DC FtNA Ctttoft f;IAns AS SUPIORT PCR c( 50.8 Pyrmas s IPAINDC g sg $2 EHC pas sonne l fmiled to DuplicatIvo of Contentlon eccpond appropriately to Ex 38. .mudio quastions Qx45: (consolidated with x 50) e %: C umsman i c a t i ons failures Duplicative of Contentions (see Ex 41.0 above) 'In response to traffic im-Ex 41.8 and Ex 42.A. Wedimint mebsages (EDC-D-1: D folcys in responding to two kJvecusttun impediments: QOC-ARCA-9: Delay in field sesIficdtlun of fuel truck ilopsdiment) Gi C omim an i t.m t l uns failures Dupilcative of Contention (see EX 42.0 above) lin response to school evac-Ex 42.0. Factually baseless. sa9tlon message Dispatch of bus 33 minutes

( P S *. - A R C A iis Forty minute after receipt of request at i&Je l cy in dispatch of Bus PSA was timely under circum-

'@rlver to evacuate school stances.

3hiIdrsn) 3e m

~23 0::::4 ';* # g ! C"t: & 2 y! 'C: Fellure to notify FAA 8, irrelevant to trrining conten-LERO will implement the new ARCA LIRR (EOC-ARCA-2: Confu-tion. Procedures were fol-recommendation that it con-Sion regar d ing the method lowed during the esercise. tact FAA directly. A let-of notifying FAA FEMA subsequently recommended ter of agreement with FAA a new notification procedure will be obtained and EOC (RAC Review. Dec. 15 1986). personnel designated and trained to communicate with FAA. W-s i W_____--______

/ ) SY HAC IN 14!v1W & LIILL 7 6 8 41DIFICAT106, IUC REVIW & ID O VERBATD4 IUC ANALYSIS D VERtATIM IN RAC IE/IW ICDIFICATIGE & IENE 7 & S NEIFICATICNS i ] ) t (see EX 41.0) (see EX 42.0) 6" s Q** .S A .8 =~. "S"

  • .2 I '::.

igt -e oeu 3% =$- ^!A y LERO Bispunse (ACTION) FEMA Evelveties of.LERO Response If X The FAA trill be con-3/26/86 Reserved decision. RAC A tegger of agreeeest with the 1 1 tectsd es part of the made new recommendations FAA hoe bees withdrawa by which LERO is implementing 9 LILCO, elece respoestbtlity for FEMA Fagar resposee, The plan med treteleg mottiteettee of the FAA hoe will be modtlled been shifted to the I!. S. .secardlagly as part of Departeest of Treesportettoe Riv. 7. (DOT) vie FEMA sa rosesseeded is the review of Bew. $ of the plee. Bowever. beoed ee resulte of the Feb. 13, 1986 esercise med the SAC soview of subeegeset plee revistoes it to recommended that 1240.sotify FAA directly (see commente for eteneet F.I.e le she plee review of Revistee 8). le f] order to secure the meet timely settfteettom of FAA. LERO APERTURE

  • id=="

i" agreeeest with F&A.- I Treintog of 1180 perseasel responsible for motificettue of rAA shoeid 6. wereft.d et. Also Avagable on ""*"'*i"- Aperture Card j 330-23 8'709010 y q

s.'% IATA CDfNNTICN CI11D AND KDIFI"ATICNS IN LDO t CQ5UUEPOODC DYFA Q1942fr STA%E AS SUPEORP F2t EX 50.8 Pf03DURES 61BAINIPC AS l O I ^l c:: ce I .t, w 5$ a: lC:

t. un t. I LOL AR C f. - 3 ;

Irrelevant to training conten* LERO pr ocedures have been ARCA LIRR was not notifled) tton. Procedures were fol-moditied. The Evacuatton lowed during the esercise. Coordinator notifies LIRR of emergency status. LERO Accident Management Tabletop Dritt emphasizes new responsibility of Evac-uation Coordinator to noti-fy LIRR. Ew m

  • 16 0t::5

':: a g 5: ): Failure to distin-Irrelevant to training conten-Dose Assessment status ARCA Duish between DOE RAP and tion. Facts involve equip-board has been revised to .ILCO field monitoring on ment. sepaesto data from DOE RAP sose assessment status and LILCO field monitoring soard (EOC-ARCA-4r Not teams. A meeting was held enough columns on dose as-with DOE representatives on sessment status board to Jan. 6, 1987 to review the teep 00E RAP and LILCO data use of new status board. Separatudl e s ' -s

3 $72fD BY RAC IN REVIDI T 1.IIID EVS 7 & 8 K D11'ICATIO6 RAC REVIDd T IMO VERBATDI BAC ANALYSIS A f UTD VEMMTIM IN BAC PEVID( IGIFIfAT106 T DEVS 7 & 8 KDIFICATIOS a c Q[ ^.* l .5 tS" 4 = l e53 gg* 35 Mea

  • "1

,, a.., se mo geo LE'A3 Response (ACT'0W) FEMA Evaluat ion of. lea 0 Respunse u 4m .0c The procsdure ut!! be 9/l/86 Plenning prow lb lons as u ed* The plan hee been modified to g g modified la sev, e to ectua t e. LERO should obtain tactude sottiteettom of the licludi e phone call a letter of understanding lang leland Railroad (LIRR). to the L1RA. 1.Ea0 frora LIRR. procedure Orte 3 3.2, Page 4 of j trainits will be modt-toetructs the fitd cccordlagly. Support Services Coordinator to contact the L1RR at the Alert, or higher emergency closellica-tion, and to request clueure of parts of the metaliae if evac-estione are cetted for ' la certate sectors. Figure 3.3.4 specifies that the long taland Railroad ulli be notified at the Site Area Emer-gency and/or General Emergency ECLa. The List eheeld ateo be added to Fig. 3.3.3 and to the actificattoe diagree chose la Fig. 3.3 3. These planning j prev &olone are adequate but potat of coatect and telephone ouaber for motificet tom of the appropriate Litt official (p) ehould be documented with a letter of understeading between LEto sad the tong Island 8411-road. Tratalag of L2mo per-sonaal reopensible for eatift-catles of List should be _ u.sitt.d a n..w. we j a.,. i .o ,o tS-3 ':'. E. ". 13 E:1 1 EF" .O E. I. att I -o LERO Rvspunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Responsa I$ I. O.I. l eo i q .ma Tto dose seessement 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-L120's modificat too of the dose A I board ult! be sodlited orcise issue, assessment statue board to to cecommodate data acc W ate data free both i from both DOE-RAF 005/8AP tease and LILCO tease tsame cad LII.C0 tease. le adequate. Tralatag of the LE10 dose assesseest staff to make effective use of the PERTURE .odi,ied at.tue i,oa,4 si,oua i.e. evaluated at a future esercles. CARD h Xvailable On Aperture Card 330 b 8709010

DATA t I gg);pgg g g g ' 03mNT!(N Cl*!1D NO COMPESNPODO FYM C090ff STA2tB AS SUPPORP IOR EK 50.B PanminES & 'rRAIN g i i .e: i: 1 '; a I gu 2 Downwind distance of Isolated instance of human All downwind distances no" ARCA errone-error caused by a decimal reported directly in miles posemeasurement gusly reported as 7000 me-point misplaced during conver-without.need to convert to Dors instead of 700 meters. ston of distance units. Po-meters. -This was reviewed yEOC-ARCA-5: Downwind dis-tontial for error reduced by during the LILCO/00E meet-pance of a thyrold dose changa in procedures. ing on Jan. 6, 1987. bemple incorrectly reported be 7000 meters instead'of 900 meters) l l "I De it

  • gu da.-

En tr apolated doses Minor and readily correctable Procedure now calls for Aa0L prronsously reported as ac-by revisions in LERO proca-identification of data upon ltual doses on status board. dures and training. receipt at EOC as actual or l(EOC-ARCA-b Extrapolated extrapolated. DOE RAP per-sonnel were notified of @ose data were reported as Octual medburements on sta-change in reporting proco-dure at the LILCO/00E meet-tus board) ing on Jan. 6,

1987, t

I r ha Sauetary did not de-Insignificant. Noted but not piver telephone message cited in FEMA Assessment as to LERO Director deficiency or ARCA. Secre-promptly tary's actions dld not cuntra-vene any LERO procedure. Mes-sages designated by the caller as urgent would be immediately conveyed to the. Director. l7 Communications fallures Duplicative of Contentions KO f ENC, Public Information, EX 3E and EX 39. Ond Rumur Control personnel %*w

MLYZH) BY RAC Di REVUM T LIILD IO S 7 6 8 KUIFICATIOE. R E REVH W & II!O VERDAT M RAC ANALYSIS FDdH) VEJGLATM Di E REVny KDIFICATIOE T REVS 7 6 8 KDIFICATIQG 6-o 0 ,,O 3uw ^ i e '3 , =. 4~. 1:1 0%a

a; "3%

"I: j et 21 f, .0 LERO Respumos ( ACTION) lFEMAEvaluationof.LEROSeepense W All material for 9/1/86 Adequately address the en-Procedure Ortr 3.5 2,'section A 1 trouselselve of field arcise lasue. 1.5 has been rewteed to specif y data will be reviewed that eli distances reported by 4 to ensure 1.ERO and im l DOE-RAF tease are to be practices are con-recorded la alles. statent. To be ta-cluded to Sev. 4. The plea modtiteations ade-quately address the esercise

isome, taptementattom of this change should be avslueted at a future eseretee.

g ..... -,o a e 'O C O gw E*: 0%3 Osa

  • 1 21 27

=t1 LEA 0 Respunne (ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Seepense EI $I u 15.20 procedures will 9/l/86 Adequately address *he en-The pies has been modified. A 1 be reviewed and a note arcise issue. Orlp 3.5.2 Section 3.6, to re-added to ensure better quire that when field data is coordtaattoa sad received, the data le identi-accurate use of field fled as sa actual measurement data. To be tacor-or en est rapolated data. Att parated la Sev. 4. estrapo' sated data are now to be posted sander " projected data" on the stati,a board. The plea modtitcations ade-quately addrede the emeretse tesue. Repleasacatloa of thte

charge should be verif tad at a j future eseretee.

TI APERTURE CARD Also Available On NAperture Card 8't 09 010 3 30 M

g t J tm q ' QN!ttfrI(N CI'1115 APE) i(1DIFICATIG4S IN IEHO As C010 ESP 010ING 319% CDMNr ST> cts AS.RFPORf IOR EK 50.B W N & M NING nat- .t$ h u-52.{ Os Fallute ut RSA Fia t l ur e to post time of update LERO Staging Area ARCA petbunnel tu properly was minor and readily cor-Management Tabletop Drill record owent information on rectable by modifications in !!! (Rev. May, 1986) now status board (RSA-ARCA-1: training. emphcsizes posting time of Tire was nut always includ-updated information on sta-ad whsn nem information was tus board. j posted on status board) Rediu s ucept ion at Factually baseless. Irrete-Purt Jeffeesun Staging Area vant to training contention. l was poor and disrupted "es-Based on sporadic radio recep-

senttal" c onunun i c a t i on s '

tton problem. Noted but not cited in FEMA Assessment as derlctancy or ARCA. I ne i m l

  • 3d Ut g'l

~ ':: " ;g 2 #1 Bus Dispatcher at Olspatcher's last minute re-LERO Staging Area Manage-agca PSA mada inaccurate an-minders to Bus Drivers were ment Tabletop Drill !!! nouncamsnts to bus drivers not complete but contained no (Rev. May. 1986) now empha-sbout dostmetry inaccuracies of important in-sizes need for complete. (PSA-ARCA-12: Bus Dis-formation. Minor, isolated precise instructions at all patcher d iel not give instance not indicative of times. dualmetsy units nur mention pervastve training flaw. 0 200 stJ4 E M DRO 1 l

W %

$Y2m BY IW! IN HEVID4 0F LIIID VEREMT N HAC ANALYSIS NNS 7 & 8 PCDIFICATIO6, FAC RENIDI & 1ZH0 OF M Mi 7 & S K DIFICATIO4S m YERinTIM IN RAC EVI1M MODIFICATIONS 8 o ~ .3 .5* 'O uO

0.

a.: X".- 12 " .L 41

  • 4

.E s E

  • 1 5

=gg! o., u LER) llssponse ( ACTION) FEMA Evalualion of.t.ERO Response I[ .an Tratatng satorial will 9/1/86 Adequately address the 1220's response is adequat e. A 1 he modified to ensure esercise issue. The effectiveaeas of tral' tog n S.A. personnel put and use of the statue board by times sa latest infor-personnel at the Riverhead satIsa. Staging Area should be evalu-ated at e future eserclea. a.- so

  • n

'O u U c 'S y~.

  • u d

II .331 I'! -t: k tJAS Response ( ACTior) FEMA Evelvat ion of.LDO Response I3 .0a ~ ,All personnel goinc 9/1/86 Adeo / ely addry n the en-Lil40's commitment that trein-A 1 t l late the field receive erce tasua. lag of imad Traf fic Culdes and ls dasteetry briefing See Diepetchere will emphaelse lwhen thsy are leeued the need for giving practee i 'thstr deateetry. The esposure control briefings to tsad Traffic Culdes' field workers is adequate. The and see Di s pat c he r s' ef f ectiveness of this training t raining will be mod t-should be evaluated et a future .isd to sophasise t he esercies. nesd to be more pre-j clos with tlw i r f Isistaatton. TI APERTliRE l r CARD 1 Also Available On A erture Card P l 8709 0108 30 N .-___m_____.

DG2 02f!DfrION CITED Ato KDIFICATICNS IN 150 OMESPOO.ING HMA OCHfN!' STARE AS St.PPGtr FOR EK 50,3 P300EUES 6 '11tAINING l SI x1 E-I 3 w II Bus Dalver misdt-Minor, isolated instance'not LERO Classroom Training A3 ~ected at the BNL transfer indicative of pervasive Program materials for 90lut; (PSA-ARCA-9: In-training flaw. Session 9 " Transportation 3ttuctions to-proceed to Coordination" and " Pro-Decept lun Center were not tactive Actions for Special pr ope r l y transmitted at SNL Populations" (Rev. July, 3rgnsfer point 1986) now emphasize the prooer destinations for Bus Drivers. LERO Requalification Training Session 9 (Rev, July, 1986) trains Drivers to proceed with evacuess to-Reception Centers, LERO Staging Area Manage-ment Tabletop Drill.III and Transportation Tabletop Drill (Rev. Ma e, 1986) em-phaslae training of Trane-for Point Coordinators to follow staging area direc-tions in instructing Bus

Drivers, h

inability t. transmit Factually baseless. Problem gorrect information about originated with conflicting Buffolk County Police Oe-FEMA input into Esercise sco-partment assistance narlo. Se wt U S X 49: Inebility to regis-3 .r end monitor evacuees j Radlulogical monitoring Factually baseless: monitoring LERO Classroom Training ma-gy' 7requently took too long. only occasionally took longer terials for Session 7 " Mon- ]RC-ARCA-1: Radiological than 90 seconds. LERO person-itoring and lontturlug occantonally nel demonstrated ability to Decontamination" have been look longes than 90 seconds monitor eva:uees in 90 sec-revised to emphasize taking 3pscittwo in LERO proce-onds. no longer than 90 seconds Oures) to monitor evacuees at Re-ception Center, Ex ai Idwelt with under irrelevant to training. Con- [x 49 A): Insufficient tention alleges deficiency in Staff et Hetwption Center quantity of personnel, not their training. Aw m._

1 CZlD BY ISC DJ REVIIM & LIIID m g g g yggg EVE 7 6 8 KUlFICATICHi, FK REVIDI C71k30 T REVS 7 & 8 ICDIFICATICNS GTD VDetATIM IN RAC IEVIIW DEDIFICATICNS ~ ~,, 6 5 a.4 a 4 U3"

  1. w wo:t.

2.5 e i 13 1:3

  • U i

. a..i ~ a%g . ta i ..k X o } 1.ER3 Rreponse ( ACTION) , FEMA Evoluetion of LERO 8esponse EE j a Th* Trtnefer Fatat 9/1/56 Adequistely address tir us-The 1280 response that Treaef er A 1 l Coorditeters' training ercise issue. point Coordinators tretning seteelst trit t be modi-will be modified is adeguete. I fitd to ensure they The effectiveness of thte training should be evolmated at relay lastructione from the SAC's to alie I e future esercise. bui drivsrs. 1 -I q,: a0 .5

o US*

20. gs: i 1*: me= 4:3 2g I$5 4%g liR3 Risponse ( ACTlotl) , FEMA Evoluet ion el LERO Response Ej hj V Trataing meterial will 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-tygo e comeitmeet to revise A I s ercise issue-training to be provided to be modilled to emphettas the need to Recepilon Center monitoring (ccompitth noattorias pe rsonne l is edaquete. The lwithia 90 reconde, capability to monitor indt- ] viduele within approstaately m eiy o03.acows..d.

t. se APERTUIE

"' a d a ' a =" * ""' a - CARD Also Available On Aperture Card 8709 010 3 30 - M

f l HS (IjtIWrICH CI'ITD AFD KDIFICATICNS IN IETO CORRESIOOING F1MA (XMOff S'rARJS AS SUPKRT FOR EX 50.B PROCE1JMS & MNING c 6: Ability to obtain addl-Irrelevant to training. Con-tional monitoring personnel tention is not based on Emer-and other features of pur-clse events. Factually base- ' ported alternate monitoring less. Ability to secure addi-plan not demonstrated tional monitoring personnel from INPO and elsewhere was demonstrated. C; f.lu r e pu s s ons than ad-Factually baseless. ~~~ vloed would seek re-Conclusory allegation not dioloutcal monitoring based on Esercise events or j occurrences. 2 I OTHER FEMA COMMENTS CITED 3 _2 EOC-ARCA-7s Health Ser-Minor, isolated instance of Health Services Coordinator 5 vices Coordinator misstated human error. Health Services has been provided with re-an EPA Protective Action Coordinator later stated the view material on use and Guldeline PAG correctly, meaning of EFA PAGs. ~~5 6 .6 _2 PJSA-AHCA-It One Bus Driv-Minor, Isolated instance. Emphasis on personal ( er neglected to read readily corrected by increased dosimetry procedures in-dustmetty at anytime whils emphasis in revised LERO creased. Importance of wusking in EP2

training, reading dostmatry every 15 minutes stressed in (1)

LERO Classroom Training ma-l terlats for Session 3 "Per-i sonnel Dostmetry and Espo sure Control" (Rev. July, 1986), (2) Session 9 " Transportation" and (3) Requalification Training Session 3 (Rev. Sept. 1986). All Bus Drivers now weer LERO identtftcation Badges with dostmetry in-formation on the back in-structing them to read dosimeter every 15 minutes, i L Y M

, At4ALYZm kJ IW' IN REVIEN CF LIIID IEVS 7 & 8 MODIFICATIG6 IUC IEVIEW C? LEIO VERhATIM PM M4ALYSIS S FTAHD VERHATIM IN RAC E%IN ICDIFICATICIE OF REVS 7 & 8 f(DIFICATIOG n s. M

  • d M g

,g

S i

".* i St.

"I,

.33 i ~ 13j 2: , *8 4' 3y LE80 Seepunne ( ACT10ed) FEMA Evaluat iun of,LERO tesponse

  • f.

,uI U B The Health Services 6/19/86 Adequately address the en-LiLCO's commitment to prov f.de A 1 Coordtuator has been orcise issue, the Health Services Coordinator provided with review with review material on the use material on the use and messing of the EPA PAC's le and meaning of the Era es adequate response. While PAC's. thle le not an teous requiring i revistos of the

plan, the effectiveness of the mealth services Coordinator's training i

should be evaluated at a future ) eseretee. ?^ Q .S a C .O og 3 -u-k ~3: 5!

b. i

'8 1a .u --m =ag e 3y lea 3 seepunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of. lea 0 8esponse E3 h D The emergency press 9/l/86 Aduquately address the en- .The plan has been modified, A 1 releases, which do not ercise lasue. Orly 3.8.1, Sec. 5.4.6, to contain deleted mate-require the 1.ZRO Spokesperson rist, will be posted to have a staff membe r die-in ths ENC. tribute hard copies of correct press rolesees (ESS messages) which have been received via the 780 systes. The plan nodtiteations ade-f{ quotely address the esercise issue. Training of FIO staff IAPERTURE .t al,e u.c ei,omid 6e ev.iu.ted i et a future esercise to ensure l {N h that e st raneous talormation free EBS message drafte to not inadvertently given to the j I' medle. Also Available On Aperture Card e 330 M 8't 09 010 - - _. _ ~ -. _ - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - -, _ - - -

DNlk l (IFnNrtCH CMYD AND K0IFICATICNS IN 1130 CDRFEIOOING ITMA QMOTT STATUS AS SUPIORF FOR EX 50.8 P10C21ue:S & NNING L3 n 0I7 DI!I 3-tag tut 8;y PSA-ARCA-3 Personnel en-Minor ard inconsequential. Procedures revised to allow ARCA tered the betond floor to FEMA recommended a change in access to second floor use tuluphones contrary to procedures to reflect actual telephones, procedures practice of using second floor telephones. -0I^ ut 0 uo ta z u ;g &5$ PSA-ARCA-4: The south door Minor and readily corrected by New procedure calling for Ai g4 g was not locked as specified modifications in LERO proce-PSA Guard Post 3 to ensure in procedures dures und training. security of south door is stressed at LERO Staging Area Management Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May, 1986). 0I7 tiiY EE*

g "t

E5$ PSA-ARCA-13: Two Bus Driv-Facts do not demonstrate per-All Bus Drivers now wear Auch ers did not read dosimetry vastve flaw in LERO training LERO Identification Badges on time program. Minor and isolated w i t h dos irne t ry information instances readily correctable on the back instructing by modifications in LERO them to read dostmeters training. every 15 minutes. Emphasis on reading dostmetry every 15 mir.u t es has been in-creased in LERO training. The importance of checking DRDs on schedule is stressed particularly in (1) LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dosimetry and Exposure Control" (Rev. July, l986). (2) Session 9 " Transportation" (3) Requalification Training Session 3 (Rev. Sept. 1986). <ws

l lYEED BY HAC IN ITNIDI & LIIID VWHATDi RAC ANALY$15 j WWE 7 & 8 RIFICATICNB, RAC IUNIDi OF M 501D VEleWrIM IN NC IEVIDd MDIFICATICas {IE!lVS 7 & 8 MJDIFICATICNS qu 3; j " *: .2 3". 23. 13.o;

e. t..?

.43 "g 8 25 =*: ..k u I .ER3 Rupunse ( ACTION) FEMA Eweluesion of lea 0 Seepense I J u !Dir 4.7.1, tev. 4 9/1/86 Adequately address the en-Procedures for security and A 1

ill be revised to ercise lasue.

emergency utilisattoo of the )ndicats thIt upstaire LILCO Fetchogue District Of fice phones. may be se the LERO Fetchogue Staging 04111:14. Area have been modified in OFir 4.7.1 to adequately address thle esercise issue. The offacttveness of these plan modification should be evaluated at a future esercise. ~ w 3 u ;w e "3 3. 2*. att "%a

a;
  • 3%

at =: "it kERS ucopup e- ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of lea 0 Response Ie .ka X u .= - br i f icat lea that 9/1/86 Adequately address the ex-Procedures for secutity and A i hors should be arcise issue, emergency utilization of the ? Cocked by the SAC LILCO Petchogue District Of fice pill be indicated in as the LERO retchogue Staging be.8. Area have been modified in Ofir 4.7.1 to adequately address this exercise issue. The effectiveness of these plan modifiestione shout; he evele stud at a f uture esercise. 16 e a .d* Tu; c Y, 3 X*. uu 13 % %%3 ono . - - = II "l { I =$5 u LEA 3 Response ( ACTIOW) FEMA Evaluat ion of LEmo aeopunse <c .ua batting saterial will 9/1/86 Adequately address the on-12RO's commitment to emphaelse A I D modifisd' to empha-ercise issue, radiological esposure control Cas the trportance of procedures in emergency worker oeding the DRD and training is an adequate ree-Cher espects of Ki ponse. The effectiveness of xId dssimetrY' this t raining should be evale r/b eted at a future esercise. APERTURE CARD fE erture Card Ava&We on P 870901-0330 1 --mm-2._-.._--_-.mm.

DATA CCNitNr!Of C21TD #D PCDIFICATICNS IN IMO CORIElSIOCING MMA COMNr $*tA2VS AS SUPPORF FOR EX 50.8 PIOC30UIES & 11tAINING C 3~.g UU t 23 PSA"ARCA-14: Tun Traffic Facts do not demonstrate a All LERO field personnel AMCA Goldss did not know dose pervasive flaw in training. now near LERO Identifica-authortzution limits Minor and Isolated instances tion Badges enumerating readily correctable by modift-personal radiological pro-cations in LERO equipment and cedures on the back for training. Quick reference in the field. Procedures gov-erning dose limits and on-cess authorization are now stressed particularly in (1) LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dosimetry and Emposure Control" (Rev. July, 1986). and (2) Session 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July. 1986). .I CU EE bh 2:: PSA-ARCA-45: A Route Minor and isolated instance All LERO field personnel ANCA' , Alerting Driver does not demonstrate a perva-now wear LERO Identifica-lmisunderbtuud K1 authoriza-sive flaw in LERO training tion Badges enumerating t ion procedur e program. personal radiological pro-Cedures on the back for quick reference in the field. Increased emphasis on ingesting KI when Gener-al Emergency is announced over EBS Station has been included in modifications j to the LERO Route Alert l Dr,1ver Tabletop Drill (Rev. May. 1986). ~ ST c:: E%

  • t

.." a 88 RSA-ARCA-4: Onu RSA Bus Minor, isolated instance read-All Bus Drivers now wear AncA Dr ives did not eead his ily correctable by increased LERO identification Badges dosimetry every 16 minutes emphasis in revised LERO with dosimetry information training. on the back instructing them to read dosimeters every 15 minutes. Emphasis on personnel dosimetry pro-cedures increased. Impor-tance of reading dosimetry every 15 minutes stressed in (1) LERO Training Pro-gram Modulo 9 " Personnel Dosimetry and Esposure Con-trol (Rev. July. 1986), and (2) Requalification Training Session 3 (Rev. Sept. 1986) 5,,,,,

3NZED BY RAC IN HIVIDd T LIliD IWYS 7 & 8 ICDIFICATICNi, ppc HiynN & tag) VEIWATIM RAC ANPLYSIS '!WITD VE31aTIM IN RAC 3e/15d IGIFICATIGE & IWYS 7 & 8 MI)IFICATIO6 ,g .30 $G3 u-co- < = 1*" 1;I O% .s ? : .31 ma gI LERS Amsponse ( ACT10N) FEMA Evalualion of.LERO Seepunee A u u l l Sea F:tchogue Staging 9/l/86 Arle qua t e l y address the ,a-IERO's commitment to emphasise A 1 Atta 1880 l). ercise issue. radiological esposure control procedures in emergency worker training is an adequate ree-ponse. The effectiveness of nals training should be evalm-sted et a future esercise. I f O o a .3-

c:

It. 2.5

  1. ~~

1*: 11 5% . $. l .3m =no .1

==e LERS assponse (ACTION) FEMA Evaluet ion el,LEAO Response II u Ses ratchugue Staging N/A Adequately address the en-12R0e response is adequat e. A I Area Iten 41. Route occise lasue. The current and previous ver- . Alert Drivere consume elone of the plan, back to tev. 'thstr El tablet when 5 (in OPIP 1.1.4, Attachment 1, they heer a General Step 9) indicate that the toute Energsucy declared on Alert Drivers are to self-the radio. See Ortr edelnister El if they bear over ' ).1.4, At t ach. 1, Step ER$ radio that a General Emer-9. gency has been declared. Since the leave relates to training of emergency workers regarding esposure . control, LERO's commitment to emphasise this aspect la its training is I resposelve. The effectiveness of LER0's emergency worker radiological espesure control f training should be evaluated at 1 a future esercise. j o -

  • 2

.5* '000 3.* %~-

1. "1.1
3. %

2:3 e e ~~ agg g l u LERO R sponse ( ACTION) I FEMA Evolust son of LE30 Response

  • ' S

. u.c .ma Orelairg etterial will 9/8/26 Adequately address the en-LERO's comettaent to emphasise A 1 CD modiffsd to empha. ercise lasue. Ciss the isportance of radiological esposure control procedures in emergency worker cesding t he DRD and train bg la en adequate ether aspecte of K1 Cnd 4selectry. D '"P'""' ""**"I'***"* 'I thle training should be gr g evaluated at a future esercise. CARD 1 Also AvaHable On 8'7 09 010 3 30 - 3 D ] Aperture Card

IATA U Nt9Nr!CN C1H D AND RIFIGTIM IN UPD ODRJCSFOODG FUiA 0}iHDff s M AS SUPPQXP fut2:X 50.B pimnn4ES 6 UWNDG g nSf-D: - 5$$ l m. a Eo$ $5A-ARLA-5: Two of 8 Traf-Minor and readily correctable Traffic Guides now wear gyc4 /lc Guides did not fully by modifications in LERO LERO Identification Badges bnderstand difference be-equipment and traintrg. enumerating personal ra- ) ween low dnd ml.Prange diological procedures on @RDs the back for quick refer-ence in the field. The badges provide brief, in~ structions on the use of the two dosimeters. Dosimetry now receives in-creased emphasis in (1) LERO Classroom Training ma-terials for Session 3 "Per-sonnel Dosimetry and Expo-sure Control" (Rev. July, 1986), and (2) Session 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. Joly, 1986). 0"h 5a:hs

SS-ARCS-6:

One Bus Driver Minor, isolated instance read-All LERO field personnel ARCA ,inolated lnyebtion of KI fly correctable by modifica-now wear LERO Identifica- )rematurely tions in LERO. tion Badges enumerating personal radiological pro-cedures on the back for quick reference in the field. LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dostmetry and Esposure Con-trol" (Rev. July. 1986) now stresses internal dose con-trol by KI Ingestion at ap-propriate time. .s g

G BY RN: IN REV1fM & LIIID 7 & 8 N UIFICATIOS, RAC l@NIIM & IDO M TM E N SIS a vi:14WTIM IN PAC PENIEW KDIFICATICHS W HE:VS 7 & 8 KDIFICATIC.ti _g g ,g .5-4GO E.3 a.- 1*" 1" .t r a "I . ?. :. o rs bO Response ( ACTicall u gggg g,,,,,,g,,,g gg,3 g,,p,,,, qg D Riverhead 8.A. II/A Adequately address the en-1.4.RO's consitment to emphastae A I De 4. ercise issue. radiological esposure control procedures la emergency worker training to se adequate response. The effectiveness of thle ga atning should be ovate-sted at a future esercise. 630 .e 2_ 0 ~ $3 EOU

  • U 272
a 0%*

18 4%E 20 Response (ACT1018) FEMA Evaluation of.l.ERO Response IE k .X .m a Riverhead 5.4. II/A Adequately address the en. LERO's sesponse is ade quat e. A I 9e 4. ercise issue. Since the issue relates to training of emergency workers regarding esposure

control, LERD's come t taent to emphaatse this es pe ct in its training to responsive, The effectiveness of LER0's emergency worker radiological esposure control training should be evaluated at a future eseretes.

TI APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture Card 8709010330 ~tI

b CONTENIlON LERO F AILED TO TT.A{ COMZONICATE NECESSA2Y @ l t DATA ANA! GNIHfrIOl CI'ItD AND KDIFICATIGIS IN IDO C 030ElSPOODIG FD4A COMNP STA3US AS SUPPORP POR EX 50.C PIO3DUIWS & TRAINING AS E lEM l 34: Ruute Alert Drivers irrelevant to tralning conten-LERO has undertaken a re-tech too long to notify tion. Route Alert Drivers view of notification proce-public complied with procedures, dures and personnel will be FEMA did not cite the length trained as newer procedures of time as a deflciency or are developed. ARCA. FEMA recommenda<l that the procedure for backup route alerting be revised to reduce the time needed for route alerting. perhaps br using multiple drivers. EM 36: Inappropriate pro-Factually baseless. LERO tactive j nion recommenda-followed applicable proce-tions (wind shift} dures. FEMA Report at 33. 1 I EM_38: _ Put,l ic Information ,As ENC delayed in openings Factually baseless. ENC lno information until first activation was timely. See tnews conference st 0840 FEMA Report at 52. LILCO issued press releases at l 0625 and 0639. i l Sie i 05h w Osg' l "t l E54 l S: First news release de-Factually baseless: treele-Essential emergency infor-p layed and inaccurate vant to training. Informa-mation summartred and I (ENC-D-1: Insufficient tion was timely provided, transmitted via computer

copylng capabilities re-Equipment problem, not from the EOC to ENC and all

' suited in delays in distri-training. caused delays in rumor control locations st-bution of loformation) distributing updated intor-multaneously. Additional mation. New procedures and copylng equipment (total of better copying capability 5 machines) ensures suff1-should obviate problem. cient capability in event of unanticipated machine t I failure. I I l l - husW'8 kmP

50.C X250NNEL TO LAND INFOR!ATION 3D PY RAC IN RENUM & LIIID 7 6 8 P0DIFICATICNS, IUC REVHW T IDO VERBATDI RAC ANALYSIS D VERIATIM IN IUC ItVDH KDIFICATICE, & IEVS 7 & 0 MXHFICATICNS j I i l l l 1 i j 5 e 'd^" e <w =o US* = 1*" 1%I q$5 gaa .- g =a .5 00 Ryspuns,e ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of J.EA0 Response I$ fj U The plan has been modified to 1 g pyleg machinee in 8/8/86 Reserved decision based on D ENC sre being fact that LERO had not yet create en additional poettion, Cluttsd isr upgraJe decided to upgrace copying LERO Spoke s pe r son, and addt-

D reptscament es capabilities.

tional staf f have been assigned to assure better coordination xssssary. [ of inf ormation in the EMC. The ) srder to 'espedite 6/19/86 spokesperson la respons-APERTURE LERO 6:e for co,dinso ng th. re- !ssemination of la-

Drection, procedures lease of information working in CARD coniunciiun iih the County

)ve bean revised. )centist eme rgenc y Esecutive or his designes, if

formation will be he chooses to participate. The
t la summary fore i LERO epokesperson will repre-20 clau t taneously

'h Avauable ()ii

eeat izao et reses coafereaces.

! Press releasie are to be dio-ren2citttd via coe~ rAperture Card is 6 ted to otioty, goee,n.ent

ter to the ENC and

)L rumor control and media personnel at the ENC. As provided in OrlP 3.f ' 3.2.4, changes in =,est.nt emergency information will be electronically trenialtted to 8709-330- -- c tr i aiet l== liices and cell boerde ele TSO print-out (also see Ortr 3.4.1, Sec. S.3.4).

[' 6 i l IATA ANA rhittNTIOi CInD AM) KDIFICATIOG IN LDO .i DeumssocDg; FM CCP99fr SUmE AS SLPPORF FOR EX $0.C PpamR 6 'IPAINING AS E i. l $a Second news release de-M. d' )oyed (EHC-D-I Insufft- )ignt copying capabilities Osulted in delays in dis-ributton ut information) Insufficient copying Irrelevant to training. B. %psbility at ENC delayed Equipment problem caused vo- [stribution of Information lays in distributing updated /NC-D-la insufficient information. New procedures lpying capabilities re-and better copying capability 'tted les sielays in distri-should obviate problem, p ist lors of information) l l l I i f i b I ^5 ' s E % $ '. .5 t l a 13e1 A%#4 1 {psanddisplays -Insutticient/ inadequate Irrelevant to training. Facts The suggested displays and ARCA based on equipment defIclency status boards have been j kHC-ARCA 2: Insufficient provided to the ENC. l kps and displays) ) f W* i

a In, emu a uun d MUIFICATIOE, VLTunTIM RAC AfMLYSIS fnTIM IN HAC RNIIH & RENS 7 & B KDIFICATICNS Lit,CO is attil evaluating the lack of hard copy capability for dist e(but tom of 18$ sessages to the press in the ENC. Until LlLCO completes the evaluation of thte equipment for providtnt, hard copies of Es3 messages to the media, the response to thle esercise issue j is rated inadequate. l l li! - 15! - Y4 m i: QO 30 33 3*. UU~ 3 8*: "e3 tta 2*? 1* 21 af 4%E opunse ( ACTION) u pgg4 g,,g,,gg,,,g gggg g,,puo,, jg eggested addt-9/l/86 Adequately address the en-The suggested displays and A 1 displays and arcise issue, status boards are to be posted boerde ullt be in the briefing roce. peo plan 0 t o t he Esc. revisiona are necessary to address thte exercise leeue. The use end effectiveness of ] the additional Ep2 esp to track p ARs and plume path and the use M)ERTURE nd erecis n.- or the eCt lStatua Board should be evalu- {,Qh steJ st a future esercise. Also Avidlable On ' Aperture Cani 8709010830 5'5 m mm

\\ DATA ANA!X (DmWrIN CIM M KOIFICATIWS IN IEO g]s CORRESPOOING IDIA (D9eff STMUS AS SUPPORP FM EX 50.C pSrnunES & TPAINING gg ^ .! _5 UU$ =:-

a g "t

5I# F: EBS message contained Minor and corrected by revi-Press Release procedures AltCA estraneous information slons in LERO procedures and have been modified. E85 (ENC-ARCA-3: EDS messages followup training. messages will no longer be contained entraneous infor-released. The Coordinator matlon) of Public Information pre-pares press releases using an established format. The Olrector of Local Response approves it. The LERO Spokesperson directs dis-tribution to the media. LERO Pubitc Information Group Personnel receive training in the new proce-dures in the LERO Public Information Tabletop Drill (Rev. Nov. 1986). n OI7 c::Ei?, .5 t,, NO3 ) g y LG G: Press r eleases Duplicative of Contention (see EX 38.B above) i o @3 late / inaccurate (ENC-D-1: EX 38.C. Irrelevant to i sq Insufficient copying capa-training. Information was co bilities resulted in delays timely provided. Equipment f .g in distributtun of In f o r ma-problem caused delays in g tion) distributing updated informa-tion. New procedures and bet-gg ter copying capability should d6 obviate problem, gg l< EC Ik N a< ed N.a Ed -- w

RAC IN IE. IDI T LIIID V 8 K UIFICATIONS, HAC REVIDi T LDO VERDMIM RAC ANA1.YSIS IM IN RAC 3Cf1Di MX)IFICATICHS T IGNS 7 & 8 MDIFICATICNS 4 l 3 O ,g .5~

  • GO

=t. 2."

  1. ~~

12 141 .331 .&T oao .g .e was ..f h.h beepunse (ACTION) gEMA Evalualion of.LE80 Beepanse AE u smergency press 9/l/86 The plan modifications ade- .The plan has been modified. A I )e s, which do not quately address the eaur-Opip 3.8.1, Sec. S.4.4 to la deleted mate-cise issue. require the LERO Spokesperson will be posted to have a staff member die- ) ENC. tribute hard coptee of correct press releases (E85 oceaages) which have been received via the TSO eystem. The plan modifications ade-quately addrese the esercise issue. Training of pN staff at the ENC should b evaluatej at a future e52acies to ensure that e st r aneous information from ESS message drafte le not inadvertently given to the media. .$ n C es-

  • .5 c--

12 11 ~;2 [g 3h5 4%g nonse (ACTIOW) FEMA Evaluat ion of LE80 Response If ..k X u P an haa ken W tiled to g g l sechinee in 8/8/46 (s e EX 38.8) 3 are being create en additional poettion, <3 for upgraJe LERO Spokesperson, and addi- ) placement es tional staf f have been assigned p. to assure t,e t t e r coordination of inf ormation in the ENC. The e to es ped i t e 6/19/46 LEA 0 s poke s pe r son is respons- 'Q ible for coordinating the re-Otton of in-e, procedures lease of information working in APERTURE e niuncti a with ih-c atr een reeised. 'B emergency Esecutive or his designes, if QJ@ he chooses to participate. The Don will be summary fore 8.ERO e poke e pe r son will repre-eleuttaneously sent 1.ERO at press conferences. 8ed via com-press releases are to be die-MBO Availalile Oli 6"'*d**"'"'8*""*** 9 the ENC and comor control and media personnel et the ENC. Aperture Card o. 8709 010 3 30 -K _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _.__ _____ ____.._.m

DATA ANALY374 OtWnNrIGi Cl*1TD MD MUIFICATIGIS IN IEJO M CWWESIOODG F1DiA Copeewt STA3US AS SUPPORP FOR EX 50.C PIOCEDUME & 1 PAINING - AS S'!MTE a Hs Evacuellon duciblon Id. (see EX 38.B above) glvsn to media too late (ENC-D-1: Insufficioni copying capabilities re-tutted in delayb in distribution of informa-l tion) l I: Mwald requested not.to Factually baseless. In accor-Inform public of LERO dance with.LERO procedures j wJrkers' ingestion of K1 media were-bevor briefed about LERO udrhers' KI ingestion. l J: ENC personnel unable to Factually baseless. Facts do ! provida information to not demonstrated a failure to l medias unable to contact provide the media information. Carketing Evaluations K Not admitted. L: ENC 1u0 falsely indi-Esercise events do not impll-l cated gr avel truck impedi-cate deficiency in training. nsnt was being removed The i na c c u r a'h information was not released to tha public or the media. Ms ENC. personnel could not Factually bakeless. LERO 1 answer questions about im-spokesperson reported assen-l padiment tial details including loca-j tion of road blockage and i rerouting of traffic. H: ENC misstated facts Insignificant. 1solated errors sbout (1) when Emergency .during a whole day's worth of was dsclared (0:23, correct public information do not es-tice eas 8:19). (2) EPZ tablish a training problem. l winter vs. summer popula-l tion 0: Delayed delivery.of Onsite functions irrelevant to (see Ex 38.8 above) l press relemmes 4 and 5 to training. Media Monitoring L Media Monitoring (ENC-D-la receives information through Insufficient copying capa-EB5 messages. does not have unlities eusulted in delays irmnddlate need for news re-In distribution ut informa-leases. Equipment f.roblem tion) caused delays in d8stributing-updated information. New pro-cedures and better copying ca-E pebility should obviate prob-lem. operation Duplicative of Lontention P: Rumor Control ineffective as deberibed in Ex 39. Contention Ex J9 w== 6

J ' /., y +i ,_l 4-E IN RI.VIfM & 4.IIID '/ 'e a 8 K UITIC4flCNS, RAC REVIDI & IDO gy g g gg pV&IM IN RAC RLVDM G IFIO TIOS y7 7 g gggg i s 'k " y As provided in Ortr,3.4.1, Seq y U,- J 3.2.4 changee le,importset ,/; ,e Y emergency talormation will be., s, electronicstly tresemitted to ,t ausar Control District officesi end cet t boerde vie TSO psint-l' l out (elee see OFIP 3.4.1. Sh.' f $.3.4). ls i i LILco A.e still evolusting the I lg i lack of hard copy capablitty i l f , EDS f f. ' ,f for distribution of sessages to the prese in the p r", ENC. Until L1840 completes the evaluettoe 'of this, equipment y '.or. provid)ng hard toples of s / . ! 'It$ 'enseeg r.e no the media, the / ,/ 'Wthepwee to' t' Ate esetCle9 lesse Is resed leadequate. / ? l 1 s ~ (see EX 38.8) e u + / f 5.s v i / i f d i * ./ l T I t I / 4c J k s s } e 1 f \\ A"EItTURE use ex 38.m CARD Aleo Ave.%ble on 'h erture Card P [) 87 00 010 3 30 - %ennen i c ) r j 1-7

, l' 5 DATA ANA C3mWTIGl CI'ITD AND KDIFICATIGES D11D0 ( (DigeslocDG FDIA C@#eff STATUS AS SLPPORY FOR EK 50.C _ PPn m ass & TRAINING As G 's LERO modit Icat ions irrelevant to training. sold be inadequate to rem-Conclusory allegation not dy " deficiencies" based on Esercise events. L39: Rumor Cuntrol ,a Call Doord Operators Onsite function. Irrelevant (see EX 38.8 above) ed ingccurate/ outdated in-to LERO trainings factually @r ma t i o*;): answered inqui-baseless. The few instances 'les t oo: t, lowly or incor-of superseded information re-

Insuffi, suited from an equipment prob-tctly (ENC-O-1:1 ilent cop /ing capabilities lem.

New procedures and bet- >8 ENC)resulted in delays ter copying capability should a distributing information obviate problem, e rumcr control personnel) ): Late responses to simo-Onsite function. Irrelevant Oted rumor messages to trainings conclusory and factually basaless. Responses to messages were as expedt-tious as accuracy would allow. Personnel acted according to procedures. l4 Rumor Control personnel Onsite function. Irrelevant (see EX 38.0 above) Drovided inaccu-to training. Information pro-Ste/ superseded information vided was generally timely and (ENC-D-1: Insufficient correct. Isolated instances

opying capabilities at ENC of inaccurate information were resultsd in delays in based primarily on an equip-Olstributing information tu ment problem.

New procedures umor control personnel) and better copying capability should obviate problem. ~44: (1st sentence con-Irrelevant to training. Fac-F[MlIdato G th Ex 38 and tuelly baseless. Emercise (( 39): Failure to provide events do not support allega-Jccurate. cleas information tion of substantial evacuattoei Jould create a substantial shadow. Dvacumtlun " shadow" lx 22F: Fathe assumption Irrelevant to training. 5f no pe eena ture evacuation Conclusory allegation not based on Esercise events. [x 41 Te at t ic impediments bF^ b-.5 low mobilization of Irrelevant not a training mt Onsd Crews problem. Factually baseless. . Eg, Sufficient Road Crews were mo- ,8*; bilized in accordance with procedures. 33,j o M 1 S*Md D I F4 61ur u to rebpond ade-Duplicative of Contentions Traffic Engineer added to Justely to two eoad impedl-EX 42.0 and EX 45.A. Facts do EOC. LERO Traffic Control l entsi (Il Communications not demonstrate a pervasive Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May. ellusas ut LOC (EOC-D-1: training flaw. Isolated in-1986) and PAR / Accident Man-1 clays in responding to two stances of communciations agement Tabletop Drill Ill >vatuation lehped ienent s ) problems readily correctable (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasize ] by revisions in LERO proce-responding to evacuatton dures arid training. impediments including com-munication of information, equipment requirements, re-sponse priorttles, and al-ternate traffic routing. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-sion 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July, 1986) empha-sizes communication of in-formation and timely re-sponse to evacuation imped-ma==* i tnen t s. i

BY RAC Dd IEVIDI & L.IIID 7 & 8 KI)1FICATICNS, PAC FONTDd & IIFO VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS Vt36Wr1H IN RAC IEVInd HX)IFICATICHS CF ICV 5 7 6 8 KLIFICATIO4S i l (see Ex 38.8) (see EX 38.8) 'c 6 o a I 4- '000 c 7*

~.

g, 2": NA5 SS

    • 2 21 273
  • tt

[80 paspunge ( ACTIOes) FEMA Evefustion of.LERO tesponse I[ k0e .as ecedures have been 5/26/86 Adequately addeess the is-The plan hee been revised to A i eleued and revised sues raised in the eser-add a traf fic engineer t o t he ensure 11formetloa

ctse, staff et the EOC to evetusta impediments le any possible impediments to sepaly passed to sii rp{

A evacusttoe and to make recoe-Devant personnai sad r1 mondations on necessary changes coordinated re s ponse J to evacuation routes la (plement ed. In addt-4 yy l response to potentfel taped!- artALI]> en, a Trotiic mente. precedures for itend (3 t nes t hee been

workers, i.e.,
drivers, e

ded to the LEED EOC graf fic guides, etc., have been off to eselet in modP.fted to inciude lastruc-Also Ava.dable On oiusting and tio.s to.ke pro.pt. infi. osiuping alternate 'd BTlDTD Card ution t hragli their memunt-P esins. ,etto, natuo,h of an,,ote.tisi o Traffic Cuidsace 5/26/86 t ape dime nt. provietone have se to, Tr-. h.e won de to issue.. us 8709 010 3 30 -Y ce .odified so -- s - ia - ~~< ' ' > < eorporate the cheegee to evacusttoa routee ongse to the pro * ~ ~ ere neceemory. duges. Attachment

' =g % DNrA ANAINE woIrtcATICMi IN IDO IEN a3ppeft FrARJS AS SUPPORT FOR EX 50.C P3002MES & TRAINING As sm i t i I L i l i l l i I 1 m O I ^l c:: X X -, .2 t ." a $, j me b 5 N J, (2) Delay in field Minor and readily corrected by LERO Traffic Control proce-ARCA berificattun of fuel truck revisions in LEPO procedures dures have been revised to Crepsdiment (EOC-ARCA-9: and training. espedite dispatch of per-Delay in field verification sonnel responding to incl-- Sf fuel truck impediment) dents identified by the l EOC. LERO field personnel now receive training with increased emphasis on re-sponses to evacuation im-pediments. Modifications have been made ins (l) LERO Evacuation Route Spotter - Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May. 1986): (2) LERO Staging Area Management Tabletop Drill !!I (Rev. May, 1906);.(3) LERO Traf-fic Control Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May, 1986): (4) LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 0 " Traffic Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986). .~ w E ..:n

> BY 14AC IN IEVIJDi & I.Il4D 9 6 8 W UIFICATIGE, RAC EVIEW T 1250 VDIBATDI 14AC ANALYSIS VDeWrIM IN 1%C IRMIEW KDIFICATIOg Cr i&NS 7 6 810DIFICATICNS laternal coeuvanicat ions withis the 1.580 50C reg 6telag esesse-ment of and respease to evacue-tion lepedimente have-been edequately addressed through modificettoa to the procedures (esp. Ortr 3.6.3. Traf fic Con-trol). The Evacuation Route Coord e nster le roepumelbie - f or obtaintag perio.ile updates free the Beacuation Soute Spottete, sad immedletely reporttag road tapedlemate or other problems te-the Traffic Centrol Co-ordinator and Road lagtatics Coordinator (see OrlP 3.6.3, Sec. S.6.7). taad Tretiic Guideo (at the staglag areas) are to report say incident that has the poteattet for slowtag the avecuation beoed en reports from Traffic Guides la the field to the Traffic contre! Point Coordinator la the LE80 SOC (Otir 3.6.1, Sec. S.3.6). pria notificettee of a read tapedteent free the Evacustten Soute Coordinator, the Road lagtetice Coordlestor le re-aposelble for eseurtag that se adequate number ' of suitable read crew vehicles are die-patched. to respond to the lopedteent (see OrtP 3.6 3, Sec. S.S.10). The pha modification ade-quotely eJdressee the leeues reised in the esercise. Effec-tive use of t hese plea modifi-catione shoute be evaluated at --e -f et wee-easreise. o a OGO c E X.:: --*1-2*1 '18 gg 253

  • ag a are nee (action) u rr m Evaluatson us 1.Emo neerunse 33 yj

'rocedares and trata-9/1/86 Adequately edtfress the en-The plan has been modified (See A 1 mg artil be revloed to ercise issue. Ortr 3.6.3 Sectione 3.1 S.2.6 lite flestbtitty in and 5.4.2), to esaure that all ressmen aselgament. Sapedteente to evacuation utit sneure that be promptly

reported, that gisertti T

ro-a.i ere. eu-ouinea.i ,.ro ana -e die-c;tely dispatched for patched in an sapedited menaer, APER- .a thei-the.e se cooainen - sesdimext vertisca-between the Traf fle Control Co-ten se scher avecue-ton enigsucy! CARD ete n.c , ti.e ivo ueu on Co.r-dinator and the Beacuatten Soute Coordinator. The Evacue-tten Route Coordtaater to Also Available On t.. pone nt. f o6t.latag,.n-te 3,'ot,,e (ges g,'1, 3,. 3, Aperture Grd Sectica S.6.7). The plea modi-ficatione adequately addreas 1he .,toeus. the eseresse tre ain, of eff-av.ne.e 87 09- 010 3 30 '"$ 7 sw soi "- =~i - c -- uno eu ca uaceu-o ath Deute Spotters wie Stastag Arese should be svolueted at a future esercise.. e'

am COMWrICN CITED Ato PODIFICATICNS IN LEFO coRIEsioonc nNA ansr grA2US AS SUPPORr FOR I:K 50.C Pf032XJMS & '!BAINDG "E .s U" $e Z28 (J) Appropriate Factually baseless. Personnel LERO Tr af f ic Cont rol Tab-arc persunnel not dispatched to and equlpment required to letop Drill V (Rev. May, remove multiple vehicle ac-clear blocked road were sent 1986) emphastres communlCa-cldent sund linped i men t to accident. Facts do riot tion directly between the (PSA-ARCA-U: Appropriate demonstrate a training flaw. EOC and Road Crews to en-personnel nut dispatched Any problems were minor and sure appropriate response. to clear multiple vehicle readily correctable by revi-a c c i desn t :uad impudlment) sions in LERO procedures and LERO Classroom Training training. Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Control" trains traffic control per-sonnel. 'ncluding Road Crews, to communicate by radio with the Road Logis-tics Coordinator at the EOC. C: Not admitted. Da Not admitted. E Addition of Traffic En-Irrelevant to training. gineer to EOC would not Conclusory allegation not eliminate flaws in dealing based on Enercise events, wIth road l ehped i men t s Ex 221: ( tluo l t with under !d. Ex 41] Erroneous assump-tion that LEkO fieeds to be able tu deal with only two road lenpediments j}l t; 5o* EX 42 (Babes incorporated -u3l In EX 38 & Ex 39T-Eo$l a \\ 9 As unt iere l y / inef f ec t ive DupilCative of Contentions (see EX 41.8 above) D response to road impedt-EX 41.8 and EX 45.A. ments (EDC-D-1: Delays in re ponding effectively to eoad Impetiistien t a ) v,s 1 I

LYZFD BY RAC IN REV. ID( CF I.IIID EVS 7 6 8 KUIFICATIQ6, p;c pgyrgy y g VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS & REVS 7 6 8 KDIFICATICNS ATID VDenATI'4 IN PAC PEVIIM M]DIFICATICNS 3 2 e

  • U u U

...c g:: a.: 1 ? *- "o.** i E.0 : =}i' ig" ( FEMA Evoluellen of.LE80 Respaces I$ ..k u.a. LER3 kraponse (ACTION) After rutJ creus are M/A Adequately address thu es-LEN0's responeia le adequate to A .g i orclee issue. address the issue of inappro- ' diepstched to their priate egulpeent being sent to fistd positione ti.e y respond to the tapediment connunicate vie radio problee introduced in the eser- ,with the EOC. The cise. Plan revisione made in l into Traf fic Guides et response to deficiency LERO EOC !ths Strging Area do I should be sufficleat to en-I s,st decide which sure timely response to evacue-trucks are to be dio. tion impediment s. procedure pttrhed to e particu. OFir 3.6 3, Sec. 5.5.30 hee let i: pediment. I been added and now makes clear that once dispatched from their prestaged location to respond to en impedleent problem, road creve are to be le radio con-tact with the ECC. The Boed Crew procedure (Attach. 2 of 0FIF 3.6.3. sec. 6, page 2 of

2) opecifies that Road Crews j

ere to contact the Road Isgletice Coordinator et the f EOC if probleme artee. The l vffectivenese and LERO worker ksewledge of these procedures shoold be evaluated at a future .se,cise. TI APERTURE CARD b Also Available Om

5-H:

3I5 N%peristre Card

i. !. 5
E E

.g jg3 41g JO artpunee (AcTioW) l FE84A Evolust ion of LERO Seepense I.E IIu u euc etdures hve been 5/26/s6 (see EX 41.0) The plan hee been revloed to a g >0swed and revloed add a traf fic engineer to the ensure tzfornetton staff et the EOC to evaluate a:pedimente le say possible impedteente to gely p12:ed to att evacuation and to eeke recom-desnt petroanel and sendettone on necessary changes Suorditettd reepsees to evacu.n on routes 1. 8709010330 33 une tt ed, i., e m. response to,oiennai se,edi. C. e Traffic mente. Procedures for field

0aart has been
workere, i.e.,

bee drawere, bd to the LARO anC traffic guides, etc., h ve been _________m_

( [ATA AIE mm Cm AfD MDIFICATIWS IN LEIO ( amRESK3OING ME 039fNr STARE AS SUPPORP FOR EX 50.C PRDHAWS & MNDC AS gi i i i 1 l l f ? l I t n S I ^ I$ af* a:fx Da tin t ine l y/ inetter.aua t e Duplicative of-Contention LERO procedures modified to ARCA respunse to H i ttge School Ex 45.0. Factually baseless. ensure additional staff are I evacuation message Dispatch of bus 33 minutws used to assist the Special (PSA-ARCA II: Forty minute after receipt of request at Populations Bus Dispatcher. delay in dispatching Bus PSA was timely under circum-LERO Classroom Training ma-Drives to wvacuate school stances. terials for Ser.ston 9, chlIdsvn) " Transportation Coordinator" and " pro-tective Actions for Special Populations" emphasize need for assistance in empediting special popula-tion buses. Transportation Tablatop and Staging Area Management Tabletops also emphasize this. g <w# L_______-_-________.___-__.__-.

BY HAC IN l@NIIW & LIIID VEMMTIM RAC ANA!JSIS 7 6 8 T o n'ICATIO E, P/C REVID4 & IEHO @ VE:RlWTIM IN PAC REVID4 K UIFICATIO S & IGNS 7 & 8 MDIFICATIOG t I modified to include lastruc-pelf to asettt in tions to make prompt mottft-haluating and cations through their communt-pvoleping alternate cetion natuork of any pcteettet pating. t aped tnent. Provisione have l been made to lesus sa RSS eessage in the event that b Traffic Guidance S/26/86 foble Top TT-6 hea changes to evacuattoa routes Den modified to are accessary. % corporate th Internet comenaicatione within Danges to the pro-the 1,ERO EOC regardlag seasse-A""** emat of sad response to evacue-tion tapedleente have been ad quately addressed through modtitcation to the procedures (esp. Ortr 1.6.1. Traf fic Con-trol). The svacustion Route Coordinetur le sospensible for obtstatast perto.tle updates from I the Evacuation Route Spotters. and lamediately taporttog road impedteente or other probless to the Traffic Coetrol Co-ordinator and Saad logistica 4 Coordleator (ses Ortr 3.6 3, Sec. 3.6.7). 8.a ad TraifIe Outdes (at the stagtag areaa) are to report say facadent that has the poteattet for stoutag j the evacuattoe based on reporte free Traffic Guidee la the field to the Traffic Control Point Coordtaator le the LERO BOC (OFIF 3.6.3 sec. S.3.6). Upon notification of a road tapedlesas f ree the Evacuation toute Coordtaator, the Road legiatice Coordtaator is re-sposelble for ensuring that an adequate number of outtable road cree vehicles are die-8 I patched to respond to the tapediment (see Ortr 3 6.3, Sec. 5.5.10). The plea modification ode-quately eJdresses the leeuse raised in the esercise. Effec-aiva use of abase plas noJtiI-cation. shuute be evaluated et --e 4 .re ese cei e,. .i o a .5-500 e "3 go: Pe a:1 Ma

a:

.**1 1 28 "4; je! OX LERO Response (ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of LERO Seepunse 4 f, U Oevision 8 unit be 9/1/86 Adequately address the The plan has been modified in A 1 aevloed to indicate en e.orcise tsbue. Ortr 3.6.$. Sec. S.4.2. to in-odditional LF.ro stoft struct the Special Populations preon will sealet the Sue Dispatcher to eselge a gpecial .ropulettone Transfer Point Coordinator to Oue Dispatcher. sostet in briefing drivers to assure e more timely dispatch. Ti These plan modifications uhtch APERTURE d" i i r dd"" '* "".t 'a tsaue amid 6e avaiu.t.d a CARD 8709 010 3 3 0 - % cr i Also lydWile on " Aperture Cars

D 1 i DATA ANA (INIYNTIO4 CITtD AND KDIFICATIO4S Ia IEFO I COFG4:SKPODC FDIA 0090fr STMUS AS SUPKRP FOR D 50.C P4NJIES & THAINING AS 6 Cs Inablitty 'o handle un-Ouplicative of Contention i dapec t ed r umor a EX 39. ~ \\ S I^h C5:- 'O a g 3:a Di ' Inability of Traffic Readily correctable by revi-LERO Classroom Training ARCA ! Guides to respond to stons in the LERO procedures Program materials for evacuee questiens and training. Session 8 " Traffic Control" (PSA-ARLA*7: Traffic (Rav. July, 1986) now Guldes lacked complete in-trains Traffic Guides to formation on the approprl-instruct evacuees to listen ate destination for to the EBS radio station for evacuation information evacuees including evacuation desti-nations. LERO Identifica-j l tton Badge for Traffic Guides, listing job-related duties on thF back.-In-structs them ta advise evacuees to listen to the j l EBS station, A

  • g ~6 l i

a l O tl g! s : 8-si D. (cont,) InabtIity of Facts do not demonstrate a Traffic Guides now wear ARCA Traffic Guldus to know en-pervasive flaw in LERO LERO Identification Badges ! cess close authorization tralning program. Minor, iso-enurne r a t i ng radiological ' pr ocailus s (PSA ARCA-16: lated incidents readily cor-procedures on the back for l Tr af f ic Juldes dirj not un-rectable by revisions is. LERO quick reference in the i dersten) encehn doba autho-equipment and training. field. The Bedge clearly rizati'>n pincedules) states that they will re-ceive authorization for en-l cess esiposur e f rom the Lead l Traffic Guide. Encess dose authorization procedures are now emphasized in re-vised 4.ERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3 " Personnel Dosimetry and Esposure Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986). I ~

/ 32ED BY RAC IN ft. IfW OF LIIID V EVS 7 & 8 70DIFICATIQ3 BAC REVIM G IEFO VERBATIM RAC ANAIYSIS NITD VERHATIM IN BAC REVIEM MX)IFICATICNS OF REVS 7 & 8 F3 dFICATICNb 1 3 5 l .5-500 2.* 3 4". 33 1:1 5%

  • 3'

^%3

?;

.gf t.Esa suspun.e (AcTeou FEMA Evalvetloa uf I.E80 Rescua n d5 .,1 o X u The Traf ttc Culde pr a-9/1/86 Adequately address the es. The plan has been modified, A 1 1 ercise issue. OPIP 3.6.3 Attachment 8, Sec. csdste set t! be mod!- 40 to instruct the traffic fisd la sev. 8. guides to infore evacuees to i lietea to the Ess radio station for t he latest emergency in-formation. The plan modtiteetton ede-quately addresa the esercise leeue. The knowledge of traffic guides to instruct evacuees to iteten to the ESS Station f or reformation should be evaluated at a future esercise. l v5 20 20 It.

~.

US* 13"j it; 8

2. ;. ?

0* - - e. a.. I e u LEA 3 arepunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of LERO Respunee 3 5 kuE Ses pstchogue Staging M/A ! 1240s response to adequate. A 1 j. Aree Ites 11. ,I Stace the leeue relates to e training et emergency workers regarding esposure

control, "a

1.ERO's coesitment to emphaelse thle aspect in its training to responsive. The effectiveness of t.ERO's emergsney worker radiological esposure control tr. inia, of.ov u he avaiu.t.d at a futu,e e.orcies. e TI APERTURE CARD b 1vailable on '%perture Card 8709010330 - 4 0 -~

I gT UJmNPICN CITED AND K0It'!CATICNS IN ILTO CDRRESFCNDING IDIA CIMfMP STAniS AS SUPIORT 10R EX 50.C PIOGWRES & TPAINING 7 m 1 a4 j

  • 5 t'!:

Z ti Some bus drivers failed LERO procedures and training Bus Drivers are now as-g tu c a r r y-out thair assigned have been modified to ensure signed routes randomly in l dulles (PSA-D-61 Bus driv-that every Bus Driver is capa-Order to familiarize them ers delayed, went to wrong ble of driving any randomly with a variety of routes j transfer point, or missed ass i'jned rout e. they might be called on to segment of assigned route) drive. Transfer Point Coordinators now check bus dispatch forms upon Driver's arrival to confirm that the Driver is at the correct transfer l

point, LERO Classroom Tralp!ng l

Program materials for Session 9 " Transportation Coordination" (Rev. July, 1986), the Transportation Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) and the Staging Area Man-a g en.en t Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) emphasize that Bus Drivers report to the fransfer Point Coordinator for verification of the Bus Dispatch Form to ensure that the Driver is at cor-rect location. l Bus Driver Driving Instruc-tion Training (Rev

May, 1906) emphasizes the new verification procedures.

The session includes a Road Rally in which each Driver runs a route to designated check locations.

  • b

.a N"

B

-e .5. k 5b F: is at t et holdes orrived factually baseless, isattic Traffic Guides are now D late at contrul putnts Gulues critical to a con-prestaDed for immediate (RSA-D-/: Trattic Guide trolled evacuation manned dispatch within the 0-2 delayud in airiving at their posts in a timely mile EPZ upon emergency control putoth) fashion. Irrelevant to declaration. LERO Traffic training issue. Any problem Control Tablutop Drill V was procedural. Procedures (Rev. May, 1986) and have been modified. Staging free Management Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) emphastae prestaging and rapid deployment of Traffic Guides in 0-2 mile EPZ. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-sion 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July, 1986) empha-l alzes pre-equipping and l pre-assigning of Traffic Guides. i I %, - v L___________________

.i..,,,..u SY2fD BY PAC IN EVIfM OF I.IllD IEvS 7 & 8 MrOIFICATICNS, RAC EVIEW OP IHO VERBATIM IMC ANALYSIS 51TED VEI4WTIM IN IMC RF#IEW K DIFICATIGE & REVS 7 & 8 KDIFICATIOlS .$ n.. ~ ~ ** wE

  • O~

43*; E=* 13 % E1 12" gaa

?T
g =5

.1 =*: y ) C, . u.I., u LEA 3 Grspense (ACTION) pgg4 g,,g,,gg,,,g g,ggg g,,p a llR0's investigetton g/1/86 Adequately address the is-The plan has been revised. Or1F A I of t he probten re-sues raised in tne amer-3.6.4, Sec. S.5.11, to require .vsalad that derlas

cise, the bua drivers to show their past drille bue drt-Dispatch Form to the Transfer vers hue re peat edl y Point Coordinator to assure vslutt ss ted to go to that the drivers have reached the game transfer the correct location.

This points tnd bus yarde. vert flcation of artf ul at the

Thus, tley had not desired transfer point is also become familiar with covered in the Tressfer Fotut the s.ther possible Coordinator's Procedure
Itcstions.

LILCO will (Attachment I, Sec. 7 of Ortr

run "re4d rallies" to 3.6.4).

lhtee the bue drivers ,fastilartre themselves These plan modifiestione ade-

uith oth2r bus yarde quately address the esercles land transfer points.

tesues and should be evaluated st a future eseretee. l In - the future, emer-(gsacy preparedness 'tralaing will force tio sce af different trcacier points and bus ystos. The Transfer Point Coor-dinstur Frucedure util indicate that bue dio-pstch force are to be therbed upon artver's arr ival. le ster. 7.

  • ^

q :,: .i ~. gs: .3 13

; ?.

%:3 aan --a 25

=

.1 LEAD Response (ACTION) FEMA EweluM hr,a uf.LEliG Response l I c, "k 0 $ U a Trsf fic Guides utlt be $/26/86 Adequately address the ts-Edifiestior. si procedures Ortr A pre-squipped for imme-sues raised in the eaus-3.6.3 and Ortr 4.5.1 to recruit dists dirpstch for the cise. at leset three (3) non sesigned 2 cite Er2. An addi-traffic guides to sostat in the tisaal person wit! be diet st but ton of field kits is sesignsd to assist adequate to address this euer-uith squipment distri-g clee tesue. bution. 11 APERTURE CARD Also AvaHable On Aperture Card 8709010330 - 4l .m.m_____m__ ._______m-_m.m___.__m_--._.m.m____.m

f %,u DATA A CDmNTICH CITED MO PODIFICATICNS IN 1EHD CDRRESIOOI!C IDIA (DMNr STA2VS AS SUPPORF ICR EK 50.C PIO OIX.;RES & TRAINING QB =Sfa 4 Nh i Nh . a:s F. (con.t) Dus drivers not irrelevant to training issue. LERO Classroom Training ! ARCA dispatched in ilmuly Drivers were dispatched ac-Program materials for l fashion (P*A-ARCA-1: Bus c o.-d i ng to procedures. Prob-Session 9 " Transportation drivers not dispatched lem related to quantity of Coordination" (Rev. July. until 2 hours after emer-trained personnel available to 1986) now emphasizes that guncy declaration) assist Dispatcher in distribu-Transfer Point Coordinator tion of dosimetry. FEMA rec-assist Bus Dispatchers with onunended addi t ional personnel distribution of materials be provided to assist in bus and dostmetry in order to dispatching. Bus dispatch empedite dispatch of Sus procedures have been modified Drivers. to provide additional help. The Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletop Drilla (Rev. May. 1986) emphasize need far assistance in rapid dis- ] patch of buses. Dosimetry 1 Tabletop Drill VI (Rev. Nov. 1986) emphastres need for rapid distribution of l dosimetry to large groups such as Bus Drivers. l i 1 l [ \\ 1 I i I t I i l l b =%

EYZED DY RAC IN REVUM & I.UID Revs 7 a 8 worrICATIGE, RAC REVDM & IERO VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS I lTATED VEP5ATIM IN HAC REVnu MEIFICATIGE & REVS 7 6 8 KEIFTCATTCNS { w.__ ~ m s: q :.: .!% O

~ e 7,

1 53 j e- ^%a '1? 33* 21 2:3 =ag LEA 3 tespunse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluet ion of LEmo Seaponse I[ fX u .n ~ 1 jThere le no require-M/A Reserved decision pending FgMA and the RAC have rewlewed g g isent to dispatch bue completlun of further mudi-additional information supplied s ldrtvers within two fIcrtton of LERO procedures by 1.lLCO regarding this toeve l Ihours of a Site Area to assure timely briefings and have changed the ortginal lEastgency.' The die-and distribution of rating in the report from a pttch of bue drivers dostmatry to Bus Drivers. Deficiency to en Ares Requiring w2e wli ttin the times Corrective Action. As dia-datelled in the LERO cuased in the esercise report, plan. See analysis of the deleys in dispatching bue . diopstch, Attachment drivere were due to tesving 2. doeteetry and to delays le briefing the number of pes-i

ooenei, hue drivers and l

trenefer point coordinator, j prior to dispatching. FSMA l recogalees that there le no requirement within the plan to a dispatch bue drivers from the 1 Staging Area nithin two (2) hours of a Site Area Emergency. pgMA also recognises that step $.3.4 of Optp 3.6.4 requires the tus Coordinator (at the Lago EOC), se directed by the Transportation Support Coor-dinator, to begin Septemente-tion of bus operations at the Site Area Emergency; and that the first buses are to be die-patched from s tia Transfer pointe no suuner Llien one (4) hour after the recommendation to swacuate the public. Itowever, the Bus Dis-patcher (s) et the Staging Areas are responalble - with the esetatence of uncommitted Transfer point Coordinator not alreaJy dispatched fion the Staging Area (see Opip 1 6.4, section S.S.8) for briefing bue drivere sad verif yin'g that they are properly equipped with a bue driver packet and doe-seetry..The buseo evaluated on the day of the eseretse were able to complete their routes within the slee -frames set forth in the plan. llowever, it is FEMA's judgeent that the dispatch of bus drivers from the Staging Areas must be espedited so that bu.ses v811 be avallable for dispatch from the APERTURE . their evacuation routes within Q{ the proscribed time frames in all scenerlos. The Bus Die-pat che r( s ) apparently did not adequately use uncemettted kf b Dzt dispatching Bus Drivers from Transfer pulnt Coordinators in A e.P due Card "* 5"8 ' "d ' (" """'"d 87 09 010 3 3 0 - <.[ L za

QATA 03 m Nfl01 CI M M KOTFICATIOG It! UJO CDRRESPOODG FD4A OMMfr STARS AS SUPPORP FOR DC 50.C Pf0aumES & TI%INDG AS G ENC pusbunnul felled to Duplicative of Contention respond appe opria tely to Ex 38. medta quubtiuns a -%

- - ~ _ _ NZFS DY RN' DJ'IEVIfW OF LI!4D . ti:RBATIM RAC ANALYSIS HEVS 7 a d WUIFICATIGE. E IUMIM U IEIO ' T IENS 7 6 8 KDIFICATIONS m VE}6ATIM Dl BAC REV11M E IFICATI N by Section $.S.8 of Ortr ).6.4). Based on further analyste of information made l. evellable by LILCO, FEMA deter-eined that the Evacuation Co-l ordinator did not leeue l Instructions to prestage buses l to tie Transfer rotate until j one hour and twenty sinutes i efter the Site Area Emergency was known to pe s.. 1 at the 12 30 EoC (see-page 46 of 3.lLCO's First Bequest for Adolestone sad Third set of Interrogatortee Directed to suffolk County, llev York State, and the Youn of southampton, dated December I, 1946). This la contrety to Section S.I.I of OrlF 3.6.6 which requirsa the Menager of Local Response to direct the Evecuation Coor. dinator to besta the prestaging of buses to some or a!! of the Transfer Points upon declara-tion of a $lte Area Emergency. { 16ence, BARO did not follow the i plan (i.e., ettlise available resources and/or make use of training) and thle esercise leave will reseln unresolved Nti si = y tavr--157tV1B f8~TU~ l assure timely briefings and { distribution of doelmetry under all scenerlos to the large number of bus drivere required l to be dispatched from the l Fetchogue Staging Area. The I effectiveness of and training in these plea modifications should be evaluated at a future i esercles. l I l l l l l l l TI APERTUItE CARD r lso AvailaMe on A VAperture Card 6709 010 3 30 df 5

~ .1 DATA N4AIXZlI m m STAns AS SUPPORT POR EX 50.C I l ) i EX 45: ( c onsu l lile t ed with EX 50) ~ As Communications failures Duplicative of contentions (see EX 41.8 above) in response *o t r' a f f i c im-EX 41.8 and EX 42.A. pedimant mensages (fiOC-D-4 : Dalays in responding to two evacustluu impediments 3 ~ EOC-ARCA-9: Delay in field i verification of fues truck l Impadimsnt) Sa Communications failures Duplicative of Contention EX (see EX 42.B abova) in response to sca.vol 42.B. Factually baseless. evaucatton message Dispatch of ous 33 minutes (PSA-ARCA-II: Forty minute after receipt of request at delay in dispatch of Bus PSA was timely under circum-Driver to evecuate school

stances, children) i l

i l Se m "1$ Iu 3:$ Itj 7 C: Fallus e to notify FAA & Irrelevant to training conten-LERO will implement the new ARCA G LIRR (EOC-ARCA-2: Confu-tion. Procedures were fol-recommendation that it con

  • EC alun r ega r d t rig the method lowed dur ing the esercise.

tact FAA directly. A let* F[ of notifying FAA FEMA subsequently recommended ter of agreement with FAA (iC e new notification procedure will be obtained and EOC' e( (RAC Review. Dec. 15 1986). personnel designated and a( trained to communicate with q FAA. I om -~

/ W HAC IN RE,11W CF 1.HG V TIM RAC ANALYSIS & 8 K OIFICATICNS, W MVID4 CF M CF 3GVS 7 6 8 KDIFICATICNS piATIM Di RAC RVID4 KVIFICATICNS l (see EX 41.P) t I (see Ex 42,0)

  • h*

U.aC ^" =E tS*

  • 0.

c+a 4 E*% EUI

1..% "a

=** oao 2[ 2lI

  • Se i@ Bespunse ( ACTiow)

FEMA Evaluet iun we 4.E30 Besponse Is FAA will be con-5/26/86 Reserved decision. RAC A letter of agreement with the i I God as part of the made new recommendations FAA hee been withdrawn by G Futir response. which LERO is implementing. LILM, etace responsibility for plan and treintag nottiteettoe of the FAA hee 8 be modified been shifted to the U.S. ordlagly se part of Depa r t me nt of Transportettoe 7. (DOT) vie FFJtA se recommended o in the review of Rev. 5 of the plan. Iloweve r, based on resulte of the Fe b. 13 1986 esercise and the RAC review of subsequent plea revisione it is l recommended that 12 10 notify FAA directly (see commente for element F.I.c in the plan review of Revistoe 4). In order to esaure the most timely rpI notificettoo of FAA. IAto 1 A. should egeta obtain a letter of APERTURE =" - * '** *- Treintas of 1280 personnet b c.- responsible for mottitcotton of FAA shoald be vertited at a future ers.ctee. Also Available On Aperture Card 8709 010 3 30 -Vy

DATA f OEINr!CN CITED NO 10DIFICATIOG IN LEJO CORRES100DC HNA COMNr STA2uS Ki SUPPORP FOR IX 50.C WT1mES & ITnIlmc f5 -0I m:: - X Xc IU . aI j w E52 (C cont.) EOC-ARCA-3: Irrelevant to training conton-LERO procedures have been ARCA LIRR was not notified) tlon. Procedures were f01-modtfied. The-Evacuation lowed during the exercise. Coordinator notifies LIRR of emergency status. LERO Accident Management Tab-letop Drili emphasizes new responsibility of.Evacus-tion Coordinator to notify LIRR. l l D::

!h a:e D

Failuiu to distinguish Irrelevant to training conten-Dose Assessenent status ARCA Detween DOE RAP and LILCO tton. Facts involve equip-board has been revised to field moniturtny on dose ment. separate data from DOE RAP essessment status board and LILCO field monitoring (EOC-ARCA-4+. Nut enough teams. A meeting was held columns on dose shsessment with DOE representatives on status boerd to keep DOE Jan. 6, 1981 to review the RAP and LILCO data sepa-use of new status board. rated) 1 A--

LYZID BY RAC IN REVIfM & I.IIID ENS 7 & 8 mt)IFICATICNS, RAC RFXIIW & IER) VERBATIM RAC ANPLYSIS m vgRnATIn In Ru: sLvIew intrIcATIcm & HEvs 7 & a n IF a m q ~.: LO =S

~,

US* d It. gs 13j 2:a 13 i It

st LtR3 seepun.e ( AcTlow) rena ca.euatio. uf ga0 ne.punse 3J jjy u

The procsdure u!!! be 9/1/86l Planning provisions are ad-The plea bee been modified to g I modllied la tev. 4 to equate. LERO should obtain include actificattee of the Seclude a phone call a letter of understanding lAng taland Rattroad (LIRE). tu the Litt. LERO from L1RR. Procedure Ofir 3.3.2, Page 4 of Attachment 4, teatructs the trelaing erill be modi. fled accordingly. Support Services Coordinator to coatact the Llut at t he Ale r t, or higher eastgency claestfica-tion, and to request closure of parts of the mainlice if evac-untiene are called for' la cettete sectore. Figure 3 3 4 spectiles that the tsag Island Battroad will be motified at the Site Area seer-gency sad /or General Emergency l '.CLa. The Llat should steo be i added to Fig. 3.3.3 and to the 4 mottiteettoe disgree shoue in Fig. 3.3.3. These planetas provietone are edequate but point of contact and telephone number for mottiteet too of the appropriate LISA official (s) should be documented uith a letter of understanding betueen lea 0 and the long leland tail-road. Tralning of tau 0 pag. -j ooneel responsible for sot tis-cation of 1.lka should be asil144-48-a-tu tese_.4e e n i Q" 2~0 13

  • ~.

%S~ 8*: =3 tsa 2:a 1%i p LERO Ee sponse ( ACTioel) FEMA Emelvet ion uf, LEA 0 Besponse I$ uI Ths dose essessment 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-Lago's modificet toe of the dose A 1 board will be modified ercise issue. assessment statue board to to cecommodate data accommodate data free both free both DOC-RAF 905/RAF teams and L t LCO t eams tocas end LII.C0 toast. to adequate. Tratalag of the 4.sRO dose assessment staff to make effective use of the modified statue board should be e ei.eted.t a f.t.re.e.rcise. TI APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture Cuni P/dO90103W M - __=

b DATA 4 UN!WrIO4 CITED AND KDIt'!CATICNS IN IHO SMUS AS SUPIORP FOR EX 50.C PIOCEDUHES 8 TRAINING _] QEHESFGE)ING MNA CIMeff I3* e. DU SE OTHER FEMA COMMCHI ClTED

u 5I Downwind distence of Isolated instance of human All downwind distances no" ARCA dose measurement errone-error caused by a decimal reported directly in miles ously reported as 7000 me-point misplaced during conver-without need to convert to ters instuud of 700 meters.

stun of distance units. Po-meters. This was reviewed (EOC-ARCA-5: Downwind die-tantial for error reduced by during the LILCO/ DOE meet-tance of a thyrold dose change in procedures. ing on Jan. 6, 1987. sample incorrectly reported 46 7000 meters instead of 700 metwrs)

  • I.

IU S: r: "f 5$j l Entropolated doses Minor and readily correctable Procedure now calls for ARCA errunwously reportad as ac-by revisions in LERO proce-identification of data upon tual doses un status board, dures and training, receipt at EOC as actual or (EOC-ARCA-b: Extrapolated . extrapolated. DOE RAP per-dose data were reported as sonnel were notified of actual measurements on sta-change in reporting proco-tus boord) dure at the LILCO/ DOE meet-ing on Jan. 6, 1987. l l I La $mcretary did not de-Insignificant. Noted but not liver telwphone message cited in FEMA Assessment as promptly to LERO Director deficiency or ARCA. Secre-tary's actions did not contra-vene any LERO procedure. Mus-sages designated by the caller us urgent would be inuned i a t e l y conveyed to the Director. F Communications failures Duplicative of Contentions of EHC, Public Information. Ex 38 and Ex 39. and Humor Control personnel ww

lNZFD BY RN' DJ REVIfW & LIIID ENS 7 6 8 ffUIFICATICNS. E REVIN & IEJO T[7 8 ICATIO6 RnD VE:P51ATIM IN RAC REVIW M DIFICATIGE QO .aO US" 3:3 8*: 2%3 2*? 4:3 25 2l: 0%g u Lt:R3 Response ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of. LEA 0 Response .I E .X. Alt entertal for 9/1/46 Adequately address the es-Procedure Ottr 3.5.2 'section A 1 treusstentoa of field orcise lasue. 3.5 has been reef aed to spectfy , d&ts will be revleued that att dietences reported by to ensure LERO and IM DOE-BAP tease are to be pesctices are coa-recorded la altas. cistent. To be in-ciudtd la see. 4. The plea endtlications ade-quotely address the esercise leave. teptementattoe of thle change should be evaluated at a future esercios. c 20 aC 08" 53: .3 2%3 2*a T" %S 27: 4%g lea 0 mespwse ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluatlon of,LERO Seepense II ky ltano precedures utl1 9/i/36 Adequately address the ea-The plaa. has been modified. A 1 be revievad and a note eretse issue. Ortt 3.5.2. Secties 3.6. to re-addsd to soeure better quire that uken field data to sad received, the data to identi-fcoordteattaa eccurate see of field fled as se actual measurement dste. Ta be tecor-or as estrepolated data. All ,porsted la Bev. S. estrepolared data are nou to be posted under " projected data" on the statue board. The plee modtiteetions ade ' quately address the esercles teene. leptementattom of thte change abound be veritted at a j future saaretee. r I i TI APERTURE CARD l Also XvaDahle On A erture Card P 8709 010 3 30_ pk l t

r DATA ANA M]DIFICATIGIS IN !MO "$$ "mn FrARIS AS SUPPORF ftR EX 50.C - PlWWW & TRAINDG As 5 ~ Sth O3 ~ i-I $2 'U g l lOutl Atti G: Failure of RSA person-Feiture to post time of upddle LERO Stagl'ng Area Manage-AaCA l nst to properly record was minor and readily cor-ment Tabletop Drill III event information on status rectable by modifications in (Rev. May, 1986) now empha- , bosrd. (RSA-ARCA-la Time training. sizes posting time of up-dated information on status I was not always included l board. when new information was posted on statub board) Radio reception at Factually baseless. Irrele-Port Jeffethun Staging Ared vant to training Contentlon. was poor and disrupted "es-Dased on alleged equipment senttel" L oimi un l o a t ions problem. Noted but not cited in FEMA Assessment as defl-c l es.c y or ARCA. ~ SI^h O'$ a:f4 Bus utspotther et Dispatcher's last minute LERO Staging Area ARCA PSA mode indLLurate an-reminders to Bus Drivers were Management Tabletop Drill nouncementh' to bus drivers not complete but contained no III (Rev. May. 1986) now about dosimetry inaccuracies of important in-emphasl20s naed for Com-l (PSA-ARCA-12: Bus Dis-formation. Minor, Isolated plate, precise instructions patcher did not give instance not indicative of at all times. l dosimetry units nor mention pervasive training flaw. l 0-200 MREM DRD 6. ~ 3 _d i 0:3 52-

a g "t

354 Bus Driver misdi-Minor, isolated instance not LERO Classroom Trainin9 MCA rected at the BNL transfer indicative of pervasive Program esterials for point. (PSA-ARCA-9: In-training flaw. Session 9 " Transportation structions to proceed to Coordination" and " Pro-Reception Center were not tective Actions for Special properly t r otihmi t t ed at BNL Populettuna- (Rev.-July, transter pulnt 1986) now emphasize the proper destinations for Bus Drivers. LERO Requalification Training Session 9 (Rev. July, 1986) trains Drivers to. proceed with evacuees to Receptton Ca,nters. LERO Staging Area Manage-ment Tabletop Drill III and Transportation Tabletop Drill (Rev. May. 1986) cm-phasize training of Trans-for Point Coordinators to follow staging area direc-V# tions in instructing Bus Driew s.

EM1 BY HAC IN ItV, itW & 1.114I) D 7 6 8 f4U1FICATIG E, RAC 50NID4 C7 IDO VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS rto voowr1M IN RAC EVID4 EDIFICATICtEl & IEVS 7 & 8 K DEIFICATIONS I g. ~, q .C .u au- ..t. 2.* %~. [3]

  • E.t.I.

155 --a =ag ,.f y U LER') RJapanse ( ACTION) FEWA Evaluation of.LE30 Seeponse II n 64 batalag material will 9/1/86 Adequately address the en-LERO's response le adequate. A g O modiftsd to ensure eccise issue. The effectiveness of tret' lag . j a le A. percannel put and use of the statue board by ( Ones on Ictest infor-personnel at the Riverhead 'j Ottoa. Staging Area should be ovate-sted at a future esercise. i l l i -c i Q** .30 l .8

  • ~.

US~ I j tif 21 242 g 417 2.;$ go u 1R3 pesponss (ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of LENO Response .. u a e .I pereenial going 9/l/s6 Adequately address the LILCO's cossettaent that train-A 1 Ce the field receive esercise issue. Ing of IJed Traf fle Culdes and dzsteetry briefing Sue Olepatchere will emphastae De they are issued the need for giving precise Ott destaetry. The esposure control briefings to c3 Traffic Culdes' field workers de adequate. The d Bue Dispatchers' ef f ectivesees of this training 'Gining will be modt-should be evaluated at a future cd to erphast as the esercise. cd to he more pre-1 Oc with their flercation. y Qu sac e 00~ 3.*. .5 t'a 21 1%* tt 2::

sg 1R3 Assponse (ACTION) r[pA Evoluc ion of.LERO Response II khg

. at e b3 Trsn2fer point 9/1/86 Adequately address the en-The I.ERO ra.eponse that Transf er A 1 prrdlaatura' training arcise issue. polns coora'inators training aterial vill be modt-will be mo4 tiled to adeguate. Jed to ensure they The effecatseness of this 3tay instructions training sho.ald be evaluated at Joe the SAC's to the s future esercles. w drivers. APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture Card 8709 010 3 30 - $7

b IATA ANAIN QJmNTIQ1 CITED AND KUIFICATIQ4S IN 1130 GMUEPOODU fD4A QM1FNT STATUS AS SUPf00 fDR EX 50.C PKXIDLUES & TRAINDG AS H lootsility tu t rettbml t FoctumiIy babeIess. P r o ta l e m correct t eit ur ma t t ori atjout originated with conflicting Suffolk County Pulice Oe-FEMA input into Enercise sco-pe r t ene n t obsistence nariu. EX 23: ( tso s i s considered Duplicative of Contention (see Ex 45.D above) under subpart Ex SOC) En-Ex 45.D. Minor and readily trapolated boses reported correctable by revisions in as actual doses. LERO procedures and t ra ir.i ng. TEdb ARCe-6 Extrapolated dose data nure reporied as actual meesuaements on sta-I tub buerd) -=. U .E E * }$'$ a OTHER FEMA COMMENT CITED u EE3 EOC-ARCA-7 Health Ser-Minor. isolated instance of Health Services Coordinator AKA T vices Coordinator misstated human error. Health Services has been provided raith re-E an EPA Pr otec t ive Action Coordinator later stated the view material on use and Recommendetton PAG correctly, meaning of EPA PAGs. P e t v., s

) BY HN! IN REN11M CP IJim ,7 6 t HUIFICATICNS. RAC REVHM & LDO VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS h VEMATIM IN RM Rt nM >0DIFICATICNS T IENS 7 6 8 MDIFICATICNS y (see Ex 45.0) r 1 1 ) -,.c qu j c I". UU~ ".2 83 .3 i 21? 1* O'I i 23: 4%g {1

== hpropense(ACT10el) l ,m " LILCD's commitment to provide A 1 Se rv ic es 6/19/86 Adequately address the un-f 66estth rdtaater has been arcise issue, the lieelth Services Coordinator with review materiet on the see hvidtd with review and ueening of the EPA FAC's to Lot t et o2 the use se adequate response. Wila ) metntrg af the EPA thle te not so lesme requiring

peg, revistee of the
plan, the effectiveness of the 16eenth j

5.tytees Coordinator's tratalag ( should be evaluated at a future es...ies. 4 i i TI APERTURE l ~ CARD bt?"$',.l" i d 330 - 4 I 3q09010 --a.._---a -.-x.-.w-

b b CONTEN9 6 LERO FAILED 9 er s / TO POLLOW DIRE @ DATA ANA! GJflutrIOJ CIn:D AND NNE N NE STARE AS SUPEORP FOR EX 50.D Igg g ER 41: lied ic Impedim_wy h As bluw mobilization of irrelevant; not a training Road Crews problem. Fectually baseless. 3 Sufficient Road Crews were mo-

  • f^

Dilized in accordance with ,pg procedures. $h an D 0: failure to respond ade-Duplicative of C'ontentions Traffic Engineer added to qustely to two road impedi-Ex 42.0 and EX 45.A. Facts do EOC. LERO Traffic Control mentes (3) Communications not demonstrate a pervasive Tablatop Drill V (Rev. Nay, tailurch at FOC (EOC-D-l: training flaw. Isolated in-1986) and PAR / Accident Man-Daisys in responding to two stances of communciations agement Tabletop Drill III evacuallon impediments) problems readily correctable (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasize by revisions in LERO proce-responding to evacuation impediments including com-dures and training.. munication of information, t' equipment requirements, re-sponse priorttles, and al- ) i tornate traffic routing. I LERO Classroom Training l program materials for Ses-sion 8 " Traffic Control" 5 (Re. July, 1986) an@ha-sizes communication of in-formation and timely re-sponse to evacuation imped-tments. 3 J t 6 i x 1 1 l 1

9..y U--______

A 'Y h. l e }EX*A.D 4 - 'I ICIAIN PERSONNEL s } CN5 OF SUPERIOR 5 ,, s fy ,o B BY RAC IN EVIDI & LIIID I l 7 & 6 WU1FICATICNS. RW'EVIDI & 1130 VE:RBATIM RAC ANALYSIS 3D VD6ATIM IN RAC IGNIDi KOIFICATICNS d & IENS 7 & 8 KUIFICATICNS .1 'j a-g._ u 5 . Jf 7" 3

r,.,

,g ,a r re p i S 3 :: ~~ ...e J

=

;; j

EIS Ik! 4%[ n. E.a u.o on.I m. eel nee ai ]!; a.,,,,un,e mu 0,,) ecsdurse have been S/26/86 Adequately address the is-The plan hee been revised to A I citued cad revloed eues raised in the emer-add a traffic engineer. te the ) Anzure 'information clae. etaff et the ROC to evaluate I say poselbis impedleente to ) 1;pediannte le 'oeptly passed to all evacustf ee. mad to es,he.reces- )lesent personnet a t.d .y esadettone ea necessary changes to eveeusttee routes le cuerdingtse response piteexted. In addi-response to ' potential taped t-KM, a Traffic mente. Croce4uese for field workera, l ides, etc., have 'seen 8.e., bue drivere, Dinent hee been traffic gu f)ed to the 1.E30 EOC modified te include teatruc-

Cif to assigt in Clutt t ag and tlone ~ ta make prompt notif1-Josiuplag alternate cettene through their comaust-Eting.

cation natuork o.f any potential D Trettic Cuidance S/26/86 tapediaset. provietees have Bis Trp TT-6 has been made to teams se 888 ca modified to message le the event that eerperste the chseges to evacuattee router. Dagss to the pre-era necessary. deres. Attachments 'interset seemuelcations within the 1150 50C regarding assese-neat of and resposee to evaces-t t ea. Sepedimente have been edegastely addreceed through modificettoa to the procedures (esp. Orly 3.6.3, Traf fic Coe-trol). The Evacuation Route Coordinator IJ responalble for obtelming perio.lle updates f ree the Evacusttee Route Spottere, and immediately reporties road lepedteente er other problems to the Traffic Coettet Co-erdinatos and Road legistica Coordteater (see Ortp 3.6.3, Sec. S.6.7). tand Troffic Outdee (et the staging erase) are to report any 1scident that hee the potentist f or slowing f{ the evacuation beoed en reports from Traffic Celdee la the APERTURE ""' *- '"- '"'"= c ".E80 point Coordlestor in the 1 "" * ' " " - '" 5 2 ')- CARD mottiicettom of a road l ilpos !apedteest f ree the 8vecuation Soute Coordleater, the Road db AM& oil ''** * * "'*' - **~ sponsible for ' enouring that me A erture Card ad**=*** ~ 6er at satt e6te P road ers> rehicles are die-patched to respoed-to the lepediment (see Ofir 3.6.3, see. 5.5.10). The plan modificettom ode-t quately oJdresses the toevee releed in the esercles. Effec-(f tive use of these plan modift-gt-g { catione should be evaluated at

== -o -f et uw ese ret een

DATA ANA! (INrtNr104 CITtD AND POD!r ICATIO4S IN 100 (DRREEPCt0DG FD% CFMnff STARE AS SUPEORT FDR I:X 50.D PIOlu.RS & THA!NING gg _a*-

  • 3d t;y Outg a

~ u 55y (2) Dwimy in field Minor and readily corrected by (ERO Traffic Control proce-Anc4 verificattun of fuel truck revisions in LERO procedures dures have been revised to Impediment (EOC-ARCA-9: and training. espedite dispatch of per-Delay in field verification sonnel responding to inci-of fuwt truch impudimenti dents identified by the EOC. LERO field personnel now receive training with increased emphasis on re-g I sponses to evacuation im-pediments. Modifications have been made ins (1) LERO Evacuation Route Spotter Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May, 1986): (2) LERO Staging Area Management Tabletop Drill III (Rev. May, 1986): (3) LERO Traf-fic Control Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May, 1986): (4) LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 8 " Traffic Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986). E.- !5 UU$ i I ;; g C*y I 5e$ (3) Appropriate Factually baseless. Personnel LERO Traffic Control Tab-l ANCA personnel not dispatched to and equipment required to letop Drill V (Rev. Nay, a remove multiple vehicle ac-clear blocked road were sent 1986) emphasizes communica-l cident road Impediment to accident. Facts do not tion directly between the g (PSA-ARCA-8: Appropriate demonstrate a tra ning flaw. EOC and Road Crews to en-personnel not dispatched Any problems were.ninor and sure appropriate response, to clear multiple vehicle rwadily correctaDie by revi-accident road impsdiment) sions in LERO procedures and LERO Classroom Training training. Program materials for Session a "Traf fic Cor t6 ol" trains traffic control per-sonnel, including Road Crews, tc communicate by radio with the Road Logis-tics Coordinator at the EOC. u* lies 13. Since the leeue relates to training of emergency workers regarding esposure

control, LEN0's commitment to emphasise thle espect in its training to i

responetve. De effeccivenees of $280's emergency worker radiological espeemre centrol trelates should be evaluated at a future esercise. i QO 30 =8

~.

03"

t.

.g s

  • S 12.3" s t, ?,

1, ; 3 --s e at

    • 3 joj!

J "g m n,epunse (AcTios) nnA cuiusilon of.i.cno seepu.se 3= u a @'s lavestigetton 8/8/46 Adequately addreba the is-The P an hee been revised. OrlF A I l the problee re-eues raised i n t rie emer-1.6.4, Sec. $.S.13, to require ,8ed that during cise. the bue drivere to show their 0 drills bus dri-Dispatch Form to the Trenefer J O have repeatedly Point Coordinates to escure c*teered to su to that the drivets have reached j eene trenefer the correct locettoa. Die i ete end bus yards. verification of arrival at the i O, they had not deelted trenef er point is also ene feallier with covered in the Trenefer Point j - ot he r possible Coordinates's Procedure { Ottons. Lit 00 will (Attachment 1 Sec. 7 of Ortr j "rsed tellies" to 3.6.4). s 0 the bus drivere Oileries theneelves Thsee plan modification ede-3 atkar bus yarde quotely edJtees the esercise trenefer points. leeues and should be evaluated at a future esercise. the future, seer-3y ptspereJeese Ontng will force 4 ese af different i Iefer puiste .end ystda. The rPT Isfer-Fulat Coor-A1

tur Precedure wlil i;

4 D D T 41TTD U /11 Li)t A U nD Oeste thst bue dio-sh f ores ared,i.e,.e l to b CARD 4.d urun e avai, in..v. f. Also Available On Aperture Card i 870901.0330 -6 2-

f.g % DATA ANAINE CCHIWr!O4 C112 APO M1)IFICATI(NS IN !JJO IEN CDRieEIODDG fwm OLMtNP STARS AS SUPlose lor DC 50.D PIOOnJIES & 11RINING As g O I ^h 05 uf att 1 F Itaffic Guides arrived Factually baseless. Trafttc Traffic Guides are no" D 5 late at cuntrol points Guides critical to a con-prestaged for immediate ( (RSA-0-2: Traffic Guide trolled evacuation manned dispatch within the 0-2 dalayed in arrivino at con-their posts in a timely mile EPZ upon emergency j trol points) fasnion. Irrelevant to-declaration. LERO Traffic j training issue. Any problem Control Tabletop Drill V I mas procedural. Procedures (Rav. May, 1986) and have been modified. Staging Area Management Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) 4 emphasize prestaging and rapid deployment of Traffic Guides in 0-2 mile EPZ. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-slon 8 " Traffic Control" (Rev. July, 1986) empha-sizes pre-equipping and pre-assigning of Traffic Guides. t l l l m 0I^h 05 ';; ua g. w M 8$ f F. (Lon.t) Bus drivers not irrelevant to training issue. LERO Classroom Training ARCA li dispatched in timely Drivers were dispatched ac-Program materials for c l fashion (PSA-ARCA-la Bus cording to procedurcs. Prob-Session 9 " Transportation d l drivers not dispatched lem related to quantity of Coordination" (Rev. July, Ix until 2 hours after smer-trait.ed personnel evaliable to 1986) now emphasizes that g gency declaration) assist Dispatcher in otstribu-Transfer Point Coordinator g tion of dostmetry. FiMA rec-assist Bus Dispatchers with g onnended addi t ional personnel distribution of materials d be provided to assiat in bus and dostmetry in order to dispatching. Bus despatch empedite dispatch of Bus procedures have boon modified

Drivers, O

to provide additiotsal help. The Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletop Drills (Rev-May, 1986) emphasize need for assistance in rapid dis-patch of buses. Dosimetry Tabletop Drill VI (Rev. l Nov. 1036) emphasizes need for rapid distribution of dosimetry to large groups such as Bus Ortvers. </ W

) BY WAC.D# HEVIDI & IJIID I e 9 6 d W EIFICATICh6, RAC REVIDd & 1DO VERBATDI RAC ANALYSIS VCH5ATIM IN RAC FWID# ICDIFICATICMi & IWS 7 & 8 prDIFICATIONS o - C 4* '$ h w

  • 2..

~ ~. y, C e-t8 g 1 ;- - o.- .2 :1 21 2::

  • ag XD Anspunse ( ACT10se)

IEMA Evoluet ion uf.LERO Response II kX U .m u Sf fic Guidae will be $/26/86 ' Adequately addrebs thu is-Hudificettom of proceduree orir A 1 Psquipped for lame-eues raised in the ener-3.6.3 and OP!F 4.5.8 to recruit Ste dispatch for the

cise, et loses three (3) non-essigned j

Dils EPZ. Ae addt-trsific guides to oeslot in the )sel person will be distributee of field kits le l )laned to esetet eJequate to address thle eser-lb squipment distri-case leave. ! sea. Eh

8..-

.3- '500 X** 1*: L1 .21 2 .i t o .. t. .me o D Responss ( ACTiott) FEMA Evoluet ion of.l.E30 Seepense IE k.. U .m Pe le no require-N/A Reserved decision pendin9 FEMA and the AAC have reviewed g g l' to diepstch bue completion of further modl* eddittomet leformattoe supplied l ficotton of LERO procedures Mrs within tuo by Lli40 regarding this issue ?e of a Site Area to ensure timely briefings and have changed the originet U tasacy. %e die. and distribution of 0 reting in the e - et frse a ih of bus drivere dosimetry to Bus Drivers. Deficiency to.en Area Requiring within the times Corrective Action. As dio-Siled in the 1.ERO cussed in the esercise report, ). Ses snelysis of the delays in dispatching bee pat c h. Attachment drivere.ere due to leasing j dosimetry and to delays le i briefing the number of per-l

eennel, bus drivers end transfer potet coordinator, prior to dispatchlag.. FEMA recognises that there le no requirement within the pies to dispatch bue drivere from the TI staging ares itu.

t.o m hours of e Site Area Emergency. APERTURE FEMA steo ruognises that step 5.3.4 of OrtP 3.6.4 requitee CARD i the ue Co-d inator <st the ! t.ERO EOC), se directed by the l Transportation Support Coor-dinator, to begin implemente- ' 80 AvaHable On staa *' 6"' *P*'**8*a*

    • th*

f ertfare Card Site Area Emergency; and that P t i,e f8,et su.ee are to 6e die. froe t iie Transfer l patched -- i.u r e ft e r the ' - - -one (1) rotute no sooner a.-s I 8709010330 453 q

\\ ~ ;,. LATA ANAIYZFA BY IMC ; i FfT)IFICATIQG IN U:HO REV. 3 7 6 d 981 iIrnwr!Of CITLD AE panrmm 6 TFAINUKl M mm \\W ATE .nuusluono nNA OtMNr STARS AS SUPIOIU FOR EX 50.D 9-

/ ! i NW D (*IN VE:RBATDI IVC #NALYSIS. )

ICATIOE, IVC M W U N CF IGNS 7 & 8 KDIFICAT!WS

) guc gygg W OIFICATIG E recommendation to evacuate the public. However, the See Die-patcher (s) at the Staging Areas are responesble with the seeistance of uncommitted Trenefer point Coordinator not a t ro oJ y dispatched free the Staging Area (see OPir 3.6.4, section 5.5.8) - for briefing bue drivers and verif yin's that they are property equipped with a bue driver packet and doe-l leetry. The buses evaluated on { the day of the esercise were [ able to complete their routes within the time frames set f e r tie in the plan. However, it le FEMA's judgment that the dispatch of bus drivere from the Staging Areas must be l espedited so that buses will be { avaliable for dispatch f ree the i transfer pointe to complete l their evacuation routes within the pruscribed time frames in all scenerlos. The sus Die-i patcher (s) epparently did not i adequately use uncommitted Transfer ruint Coordinator in dispatching Bus Drivere from the Staging Area (as requirgd.1 l by Section 5.5.8 of Ortr

1. 6.4 ).

Sesed on f ur tlie r analyste of information made i evallable by LILCO, FEMA deter-eined that the Evacuation Co- ) ordinatur did not leeue instructions to prestage buses to tie Transfer Pointe untti one hour-and twenty minutes after the Site Area Eme r genc y was known to personnel at the LERO EOC (see page 86 of I LILCO's First Sequest for f g Admiselone and Third Set of Interrogatories Directed to Suif olk County, New York State, y and the Town of Southampton, j dated December 1, 1986). Thie le contrary to section 5.1.1 of i 0FIP 3.6.4 which tr. qui res the Manager of locei geoponse to direct the Evecuation Coor-dinator to begin the prestaging of buses to some or all of the Transfer Pointe upon declara-tion of a Site Area Emergency. Hence, IIRO did not follow the plan (i.e., uttilse available resources and/or make use of [ f{ training) and thle esercise T issue will remain unresolved I APERTURE '"'"'~'""""'r escure timely briefinge and {'Q Q distribution of doelmetry under all scenettoa to the large number of bus drivere required to be dispatched from the Ab Available On effectiveness of and training Aperture Card in sheee etan modification should be evalurted at a future esercles. 870901-0330 %

( --\\ DATA ANAI.YE CJmNffGI CI'!H) APO MX)!PICATICNS IN 1J30 l (DRRESPOODIG mtA (NN!' STAWS AS SL'PIORT FOR Ex 50.D P1002XRES 6 '! PAIN 7NG AS SM l G: LHC pwskunnel felled to Duplicative of Contention respona dppeoprietely to-EX 38. media quebtionb EX 45: (consolidated with EE 50) As Connunications failures Duplicative of Contentions (see EX 41.0 above) in response to traffic im-Ex 41.0 and EX 42.A. padtmant messages (EOC-D-1: Dalays in responding to two evacuation impediments: l EOC-ARCA-V Delay in field l verification of fuel truck impediment) B ' Conwnun t c e t ions failures Duplicative of Contention (see EX 42.0 above) r in response to school evac-EX 42.8. Factually baseless. l untion mwbbage Dispatch of bus 33 minutes l (PSA-ARCA-11: Forty minute after receipt of request at l delay in dispatch of Bus PSA was timely under circum-l Oriver tu evacuate school stances. ! children) D e n ~3d! O t 'J. ~ ';; a g "t 8:#_R Cs Failus w to notify FAA & Irrelevant to training conten-LERO will implement the new ARCA 1 LIHH (EOC-ARCA-2: Confu-tion. Procedures were foi-recommendation that it con-i slon regard 6ng the method lowed during the exercise. tact FAA directly. A let- ] of nutifying FAA FEMA subsequently recommended ter of agreement with FAA ) t a new nottftcation procedure will be obtained and EOC (RAC Review, Dec. 15, 1986). personnel designated and i + rained to conwnunicat e wi th j FAA. I % e ~ms

W IN lCIID4 W IALLD tl Pt01FICATIG E, IUC REVIW & IEIO W M1ATIM RAC ANALYSIS K0 & IGNS 7 6 0 KDIFICATICNS _ 1FICATICIE 3,uwtIM IN RAC ItV, IDI (see EX 41.0) (see Ex 42.0) [ m QO .I a C s "~

~e E3 2%a

!!? t 21 2l: 4%e u pgg4 g'eluetIta uf.LEBo Seepense EE 3A3 Respuns: ( ACTION) A letter of agreement with the I I h3 FAA utit be con-5/26/u Reserved deciston, RAC FAA hee been withdrawn. by betsd sa part of the made new recommendations KMA FIEtf resposes. which LERO is implementing. Lilio, elece resposelbility for bo plea sad treinlag Setttteetion of time FAA has 311 he modified been eht ito<l to the 11. 3. 3cardingly es part of E*Perteent of Transportettoe av. 7. (D07) via FEMA as recommended in the review of Rev. 5 of the l ples. Iloweve r, beoed on i resulte of. the Feb. 13, 69 % esercise sad the RAC review of subsequent plan revistene it le i,,[ recommended ahet taso notafy FAA directly (see comments for APERT 3URE eie .t ,.i.c .. the ,ise review of Revision 8). In CARD erder to see re the -et n-iF motificettaa of

FAA, t,330 should egeln obtain a setter of agreeeemt with FAA.

Also Available On Tsetning of 1280 pe rsonee t Aperture Card r.epo.einia for notification,of FAA should be v$tified at a future esercles. 87 09 010 3 30 -65en" =

L \\ DATA ANA!: GIrlW r!Of CITED AND KDIt'ICATICNS IN 1130 C l CORESIGOING IVik M# ,; g supg)Rr POR EK 50.0 PRX12)UIES & WM M ~ S I ^5 0:::5 J:: a 8 "t 854 (Ct c on t. ') EOC-ARCA-3: Irrelevant to training conten-LERO procedures have been ARCA LIRR was not notifted) tion. Procedures were foi-modified. The Evacuation lowed during the esercise. Coordinator nottfles LIRR of emergency status. LERO Accident Management Tab-letop Drill emphasizes new responsibility of Evacua-tion Coordinator to notify LIRR. l l l l l I l n l S I ^h 65 i tag' \\ E54: i Ds Failure to distin-Irrelevant to training conten-Dose Assessment status AucA guish tee tween DOE R AP end ttun. Facts involve equip-board has been revised to LILCO fleid montturing ori ment. separate data from DOE RAP dose assebsment status and LILCO fteld monitoring board (f0C-ARCA-4 Not

teams, A meeting was held enough columns on dose as-with DOE representatives on sessment status board to Jan. 6 1987 to review the keep DOE HAP and LILCO data use of new status board.

heparated) w se.s i

9 ? fly RAC IN RINIEW OF IJIID i 7 6 tl MIFICATICNS. RAC REVIDI & IEIO VERBATDI RAC ANALYSIS h W:161ATIM IN HAC BEVIDI >0DIFICATIO6 & M 7 & 8 EMNN l I a .3-c d x;: E:1

3
  • ja

$$5 MI I FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Respuase I i u g procedure will be 9/8/86 Planning provisions are ad-I I I I"*I

  • * "III"**I'*
  • I I

tilsd la Rev. S to equate. LERO should obtain "8 I*I* I* I I'*N II'I"'I* I tuds a phone call e letter of understanding Procedure Ortr 3.3.2. Page 4 of the Llaa. Las0 from LIRR. taetructs the 1 pistag will be modt-Support Services Coordinator to hdcccardlagly. contact the LINE et t he A.le r t. or higher emergency cleestfica-tion, and to request closure of parte of the mateline if evac-usttone are called for la certete sectore. Figure 3.3.4 spectflee thag the lang Island Battroad will be mottfled at the Site Aree Emer-gency and/or General Eastgency BCta. The List should also be added to rig. 3.3.3 and to the sottiteettoe disgree shown la Fig. 3 3.5. These planatas provielone are adequata but potat of contact and telephone ( aumber f or motificat tee of the l appropriate Lisa official (s) l ehould be documented with a l letter of understandtag between 12a0 and the imag telend 34 1-road. - Trafalag of LERO per-sonnel responett:c for mottft-catloa of 1.I k t should be j -ussilled a* =f %es+-ea e n t ~6 3 .O"

  • U U
a

'{" EEe n a <~' -i f naa a - e 33 ]! ! !.........e c.cT% date assessment 9/t/86 Adequately uddress the en-1220's modificetton of the dose A 3 p had still be modified orcise issue, essessment statue board to secommodate date from both ) cecommodate data DOE /BAP tones and' LILC0 tease Joe both DOE-rap imme ord Lilio tease. la edequa t e. Tratalag of the LERO dose essessment staff to make effective use of the modifled etetus board should be evaluated et a future esercies. TI APERTURE CARD Aho AvaBaMe On Aperture Card 8709.010330 -57, 't

DATA ANAI.Y Com2#!Q4 CInD AfD M]DIFICATIO2S 1H U70 CXUESluDDG IDiA COMNT STARS AS SUPIUC FOR EX 50.D PIOGIUNES 6 TRAINDG AS OI^ C5h $E* ':: g

u 3%(l Downwind distance of Isolated instance of human All downwind distances now ARCA A

dose measurement errone-error caused by a decimal reported directly in miles ously reported as 7000 me-point misplaced during conver-without need to convert to ters instead of 700 meters, sion of distance units. Po-meters. This was reviewed I (E00-ARCA-5: Downwind dis-tential for error reduced by during the LILCO/ DOE meet-tance of a thyroid dose change in procedures, ing on Jan. 6, 1987. P sample t rncurr ec t l y reported e as 7000 meters instead of 700 meters) 3 e,, ".3 d 0::::4 g .u w 5$ b E n t r opu l a t ed doses Minor and readily correctable Procedure now calls for ARCA errunwously reported as ac-by revisions in LERO proce-Identification of data upon j tual dosen un status board. du r;e s and tralning. receipt at EOC as actual or a (EOC-ARCA-b: Extrapolated extrapolated. DOE RAP per-e cose udte were reported as sonnel were notified of a actuel medburenients on sta-change in reporting proce-a tus board) dure at the LILCO/00E meet-ing on Jan. 6, 1987. Er Secret or y did not de-Insignificant. Noted but not liver telephone message cited in FEMA Assessment as promptly to LERO Dl:ector deficiency or ARCA. Secre-tury's actions did not contra-vene any LERO procedure. Mas-sages designated by the caller as urgent would be immediately conveyed to the Director. F: C onwnun i t e t i ons fatlures Dupticattve of Contentions of ENC. Public Information, Ex 38 and Ex 39. and Rumur Cuntrol personnel an. ='

/) >BY w in% vim w uun @ 6 8 T Ulf1CATIOE, RAC REVIW CF IIlO VERBATIM RAc ANALYSIS n tricATiae & se.vs 7 6 e attrexnms mrm m w - _ _.g Q 0 ..O

  • u-3:3 834

=- l .-e

=

"2

$g 3h5 Mg

1) Bespunse ( ACTION)

FEMA Evalust ion of LERO Response II !M u i esterist for 9/l/84 Adequately address the en-Procedure Or!P 3.S.2,'$ection A 1 orcise tasue. hecteelen el field 3.5 hea been rewteed to specif y ) will be revie.sd that all distances soported by hasure lea 0 and (Mt DOE-RAP tease are to be )tices are con-recorded la alles. )est. Ta be la. >d la Rev. C. The plea modificettene ede-l qu.tei, eurese th. eseulee i leone. Impionsstattee of thle J l change should be evaluated at e ) future esercise. l l l ) 1 I - 'a 6 I .i QC ~C i l .: ~, "S* c., <,3 12 a" E%* 2 " *. . ig ETE . *g !) Reepunes ( ACTION) FEMA Evalustion of.LEmo Seepense II ..k X a ) precedures util 9/1/46 Adequately address the en. The ples hoe bees W illed, A [ foviewed end a note arcise issue. OPir 3.5.2, Section 3.6 to re-d to easure better quire that when field date is disation and I received, the data le identi-pate aces of field ' fled es se cetual measurement 3 Ta be secor-er se estrepolated date. All padisRaw.8. estrepolated dets are noes to be posted under

  • projected dets" on the statue board.

The plea modification ede-d quately address the esereise toeme. Impleaseteries of this T change should be verified et a p future eseretoe. l I N l Tl APERTURE CARD i i t j 'Also Available On l ' Aperture Card [ i n !I l 8700 010 8 30 - T7 [:: 1

(

  • y CATA G3mNrKN CIUD AND K01FICATIO15 IN LDO I

AS ONESIOODG FUiA attefr STARE AS SUPfCRT FOR EX 50.D 0 E *h' 05 ~0 t g eu _2 G Failure of RSA person-Falluse to post time uf update LERO Staging Area Manage-ARCA nel to properly record was minor and readily cor-ment Tabletop Drill III event information on status rectable by mod 8fications in (Rev. May, 1986) now empha-board. (RSA-ARCA-1: Time t r a i n i r.g. sizes posting time of up-was not always includeo dated information on statsis when new information was board. posted on blatus board) Radio raceptton at Factually baseless. Irrele-Port Jefterson Staging Area vant to training contention. was poor aeul disr upt ed "es-Based on sporadic radio recep-sunttal" c unwieun i c a t l on b tion problem. Noted but not cited in FEMA Assessment as deficiency or ARCA. nsea O'$ h ~0 t g "t 23# Don Dispatcher at Dispatcher's last minute LERO Staging Area ARCA PSA made inaccurate an-reminders to Bus Drivers were Management Tabletop Drill nouncementw to Bus Drivers not complete but contained no III (Rev. May, 1986) now about d o b i n.e t r y inaccur.ecies of important in-emphas1zes need for com-(PSA-ARCA-12: Sv4 Dis-forma *,un. Minor, isolated plate, precise instructions patcher dlJ r.o t give instance not indicative of at all times. dostmetry units nor mention pervasive training flaw. 0-200 MREM DRO vw

s IB BY HN' IN REVltM CF I.If4D 3 7 & d Mr01FICATIG6, W EVIIN T IIiO VERBATDI RAC ANALYSIS B) VEMtATIM IN RAC itV11H KDIFICATIO6 & IEVS 7 6 8 MDIFICATIOS 1 .! O -o-3.3

  1. ~=

13 ; 1%* l geo

g
    • 1 5

=as 30 Rsspun n (ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion of,LERO Response IE lfh ..i - )laing material will 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-12RO's response le adequate. A 1 orcise issue. The effectiveness of training modified to ensure 3. pe r sonne t put and use of the statue board by I m en latest lafor-personnet at the tiverhead lise. Staging Aree should be evalu-sted at a future esercies. i l vi Q** .30 US*

==-

  • .3 tij

$ 3 ~a %%3 kg E?5 A}g \\ u 20 Respones (ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of LERO Response II ($i ..a i ) personnel going 9/l/86 Adequately dddress the LILCn's coensit ee ns that trein-A 1 ,2

e the field recekwa esercise issue.

lag of Lead Traf fic Culdes and dosteetry briefing Sue Dispatchers will emphaelse j )a t hey are leeued the need for giving prectee )i r desteetry. The esposure control briefings to I') Traffic Cutdes' l field workers to adequate. The ) sus Dis pa t c he r s' ef f ectiveness of this training 3tnlug util be modl-should be evaluated at a future )d to esphaelse the eseretee. 3d to he more pre-Je with their

.r.etio..

TI APERTURE CARD Also Available o,i Aperture Card 8709010 3 30 - U ._____-__-._-_mm.__ _m_ -__.___.-____m_ -_____._.m.

DATA AW 03mNr1CN CITtI) No KVIPICATI(NS IN IMO l CORHisIDODG nMA GMENf FTARS AS SUP00RT FOR Ex 50.0 PN 6 mmo AS g 0 f *h \\ Oli: :- i !!!l a:xj Bus Driver misdl-Minor,. Isolated instance ret LERO Classroom Trainin9 ARCA rected at the BNL transfer Indicative of pervasive Program materials for l point. (PSA-ARCA-9: In-training flam. Session 9 " Transportation Coordination" and "Prc-structions to proceed to tactive Actions for Special , Reception Center were not properly transmitted at SNL Populations" (Rev. July. 1986) now emphasize the transfer putnt i l proper destinations for Sus Drivers. LERO Requalification Training Session 9 (Rev. July, 1986) trains Drivers to proceed with evacuees to i [ Reception Centers. t j LERO Staging Area Manage-ment Tabletop Drill III and Transportation.Tabletcp Drill (Rev. May. 1986) em-phasize training of Trans-for Point Coordinators to follom staging area direc-tions in instructing Bus Drivers. H Inabiltty to transmit Factually baseless. Problem cosrect inf or ma t ion about originated with conflicting Suffolk County Police De-FEMA input into Exercise sce-partment ehmistence narlo. Ies :s

I l l (BY IW' Ird REVuW W LIIID VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS

.. ti KUIFICATICNS, PAC WIW T N

) VDalATIM IN RAC EVIW OEION & HEVS 7 t, 8 MDIFICATICNS L_ ~ 'L6 g ) og .0- G O a.:

  1. ~.

1 1*: 1* 1 ga ..& g s =ag y Response ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion el.Lta0 Response IE .k h.E a ' Transfer Point 9/1/86 Adequately address the en-The IERO response that Transfer A I i dianters' traintog orcise issue

  • Fotnt Coordinator teatning 1

elst will

b. modl-will be modified la adequate.

. to ensure they The effectiveness of thte Hy instruction training should be evaluated at 5 ihe n:C e to tu. i e foto,. e..,cise. do..,.. i 1 1 l l t I l o TI 1 APERTURE CARD A180 Available On I Aperture Car:1 8709010330 - @ l _____ _ _._ _ - i

F.L i CONTENTION. l LERO FAILED TO TR EXERCISE INDEPENDENT JU5 1 DATA AM j ! CumNflW C11U) AND K1]It'ICATIWS IN UK l ! CORRESPONDING imA CCMf2fr STATUS AS SUPPORP FOR EX 50.E PECEDU3ES & TRAINIW AS S Ex 34: Route Alert Drivers Irrelevant to training conten-LERO has undertaken a re-took too long to not if y tion. Route Alert Drivers view of notification proco- . noblic. compiled with procedures. dures and personnel will be FEMA did not cite the length trained as newer procedures of time as a deficiency or_ are developed. ARCA. FEMA recommended that the procsdure for backup route alerting be revised to reduce the time needed for route alerting, perhaps by using multiple drivers, i l l' EX 36t Inappropriate pro-Factually baseless. LERO tective action recommenda-followed applicable proco-tions (wind shift) dures. FEMA Roport at 33. l EX 30: Publtc Information As ENC delayud in opening Factually baseless. ENC no information until first activation was timely. See ] news conference et 0840 FEMA Report at 52. LILC I 1 issued press releases at j 0625 and 0639. oD 0 I"h Nm

a g EE4\\

8: First news ruleese de-Factually baseless; irrels-Essential emergency infor-D layed and inaccurate vant to training. Informa-mation summarized and (CNC-D-l: Insufficient tion was timely provided, transmitted via computer copying capabilities re-Equipment problem, not from the EOC to ENC and all suited in delays in distrl-training, caused delays in rumor control' locations si-bution ut inf orneat ion) d4stributing updated infor-multaneously. Additional mation. New procedures and copying equipment (total of better copying capability 5 machines) ensures suffi-should obviate problem, cient capability in event of unanticipated machine fallure. I l ( l ~

4 50,E j i GRSONNEL TO M7 OR COMMON SENSE 1 m D BY iW IN I4WI1N & LIIID 7 & d MUlFICAT1(NS. HAc leyIEw w IElo M D VElatATIM IN RAC M.VIIM KDIFICATICNS 8 'NN i t 3 i i a u i es-o 13; 1%3 3 I oao =** .m A 11 EEE ..k E O

0 Gespones (ACTION)

FEMA Evalustion of,LERO Response IE ?ylag machines in 8/8/86 Rer.orved decision based on The plan has been modified to 1 1 j, ) ENC are being fact that LERO had not yet create se additional position, Bluited ist upgrade decided to upgrade copyin9 LEko $pok e s pe r son, and oddt-i ) rapiscenent se capabilities. tional staf f have been seeigned ),

esssty.

to secure better coordinetton p) of information in the ENC. The C erdsr to 'espedite 6/19/06 lea 0 spokesperson le respons- )sesination of in-ible for coordinating the re-roet t oa, procedures lease of information working in j 2e been revloed. conjunction with the County l Sential emergency Esecutive or his designee. if } creation will be ] he chooses to participate..The 1 is summary form LERO epokesperena wt11 repre. ). struttaneously gg% sent LERO at press conferences. 'I min.d .ie co.- ,,es. ..ie.ees are te die-let to ths ENC sad CARD '6"'*d 'a "'"r

    • a a*

) sueor control and media personnel at the EMC. eat isns. i As provided in Ofir 3.8.l. Sec. jl gg g,gg g 5.2.4, changes in important l energency information wiil be i, Aperture Card et****8 cants 'raa*=l"*d 'a h Rumor Control District officee ij and call ' boarde via TSO print- )J out (also see Orir 3.8.6, Sec. 5.3.4 ). i

3 8709010330 -40
l

b CATA ANALY QUlWI'IO4 CIM AND KUIFICATICNS IN U7O Wo OEH1:SPOOIPC HNA RM42fr STATUS AS EMORT ftR IX 50.E PRX22XJHES & TRAINING AS i C: Second news release de-Id. Id. layed (ENC 0-l: Insuffl-cient copying capabilities resulted in delays in distribution of informa-tlon) Da Insufficient copying irrelevant to training. I,d. capability at ENC delayed Equipment problem caused de-distribution of information lays in distributing updated (ENC-D-1: Insufficient information. New procedures copying capabl11 ties re-and better copying capability suited in celays in distri-should obvlate problem, button of information) 0:: hb$ z: E Insutticient/inadequete Irrelevant to training. Facts The suggested displays and ANCA maps and displays bebed on equipment deficiency. status boards have been (ENC-ARCA-2: Insufficient provided to the ENC. maps end displays) ,,,y

r y IW' IN REVIW C7 LILU) l0 d 4 01FICATIO6, IUC REVIDI CF 1EIO VEHinTDI ISC ANALYSIS EHlaTIM IN IEC Ierim KOIFICATIG6 CF REYS 7 6 8 KDIFICATIO6 l l l LILCO is attit evaluettag Sne lack of hard copy capability for distributtom of ES$ sessages to the press in the l EleC. Until LILCO complates the evaluation of thle equipmeet for providing hard copies of EtS messeges to the medLa, the response to thte esercise leave le rated inadeguate. Lg. ? l I 15!' l I l 1 j l

24 21 2l:

%%g LEBO Respunse ( ACT40es) Ft'MA Evaluet iun of LERO 8esponse I h u The suggested addt-9/l/86 Adequately address the en-The suggested displays and g t ie nst displays and arcise lasue, ' status boards are to be posted statue boerde will be in the briefing room. peo plan provided to the t.NC. revletone are necessary to addresa this esercise leave. The see and effectiveness of the additional Ep1 esp to track PARS and plume path and the uv, and effectiveness of the ECL l Status Board should be evale-l gTW.E eted et a future e.orcio.. CARD 1 Also Available on Aperture Card 8709010330 - 6/ e E______.__

DATA ANA! (I3 fluff!O4 CITED AfD K1)!PICATIQ4S IN IM O (DRRESIOUING MiA (IMOff srARE AS SUPFORP FOR EX 50.E PN 6NM As n OI7 iL EUS .I U a EO$ ~ u Eo$ F EBS messaue contained Minor and corrected by revi-Press Release procedures ARCA entraneous information sions in LERO procedures and have been modified. E85 (ENC-ARCA-Ja EBS messages followup training. messages will no longer be contained entraneous infor-released. The Coordinator mation) of Public Information pre-pares press releases using an established format. The Director of Local Response approves it. The LERO Spokesperson directs dis-tribution to the media. LERO Public Information Group Personnel receive training in the new proco-dures in the LERO Public Information Tabletop Ortli (Rev. Nov. 1986). G: Press releases Duplicative of Contention (see EX 38.8 above) late / inaccurate (ENC-D-1. EX 38.C. Irrelevant to insufficient copying capa-training. Information was bilities resulted in delays timely provided. Equipment in distribution of informa-proulem caused delays in tion) distributing updated informa-tion. New procedures and bot-ter copying capability should obviate problem. H Evocuattun decision 10. (see EX 38.8 above) given to mudte too late (ENC-D-1: Insufficient copying capabilities re-sulted in delays in distri-bution of information) la Medid sequested not to Factually baseless. In accor-inform public of LERO donce with LERO procedures workers' ingestion of K! media were never briefed about LERO workers' K! Ingestion. J ENC personnel unable to Factually baseless. Facts do provide information to not demonstrated a failure to medlas unable to contact provide the media information. Marketing Evaluations Ks Not admitted. La ENC lug talbely indi-Esercise events do not impft-cated gsevel truck impedt-cate deficiency in training, ment uds being remuved The inaccurate information was not released to the public or the media. r.,* -V

/ / BY W! IN EVLIN & LIIII) 7 6 8 Pt01FICATIOE. PM IWIEW & 1210 VERDATDI RAC AtMLYSIS VEI4 AT1H IN RAC EVID4 KDIFICATIOS CF EVS 7 6 8 MIFICATICNS t N I o a e dw OCO ~~ l

3. *.
  1. ~.

~ co-E*% EUI %." 'm oao =5 = $5 EEI . e$ K0 Eaepunas (ACTIOW) FEMA Evaluation of Lta0 Beepunse IE O% ) emergency press 9/l/86 The plan modifications ade- .The plan has been modified, A 1 , Gases, which do nut quately address the ener-OPip 3.8.l. Sec. S.4.4, to )t ain deleted mate. clso issue. require the 1.ERO Spokes pe rson 11, will be posted to have a staff member die-the EWC. t ribute hard copies of correct press releases (ESS messages) uhtch have been received via the TSO system. The plan modifications ade-quately address the esercise issue. Training of plo staf f at the ENC should be evaluated at a future esercise to ensure that estraneous reformation from ESS message draf te le not inadvertently given to the media. l (see Ex 38.8) (see EX 38.8) TI APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture Card e-8709010330 -4 L

r ( (MA AM8!,Y t G2mNTI(2.' CITW AND K0IFICATIO1S IN IMO CORHILICODE MNA Offsr STARS AS SUPlORP KAl EA $0.E PTOCEDURES 6 TRAINE _ _ '.AS & 4 i l Ma ENC personnel could not Factually basoleas. LERO cnswer questlonb about im-spokespersaa reported essen-pediment ttal detatIs* incl Wing 'I o c a - tion of road blockage and rerouting of traffic. N ENC misstated facts Insignificant, laolated errors i about (1) when Emergency during a whole day's worth of was declared (6:23, correct public information do not es-time was 8 19), (?) EPZ tablish a training problem. winter vs. bummer popula-tion Os Deleyed uulevery of Onsite functions irrolevant to (see Ex 38 B above) press reledses I and 5 to t aining. Media Monttoring i Media blos i i t or i ng (cNC-D-1: receives information through Insufficient (. o p f ing capd-EBS messaJos. does not have bllItios eusulted in delmys i mme d i a t e noted for news re-les dis t r t tiut ium at tnforma-leases. Equipment probleni tion) causesu om lays in rii s t r ibu t ing i updated information. New pro-cedures and better copyireg ca-( pebility should obviate prob-lem. P Rumor Control operatton DuplicatIve of Contenfnon ineffective n described in Ex 39. Contantton EX 39 Q: LEHO modifications Irrelevant to training, would be inadequate to rem-Conclusory allegation not edy " deficiencies" based on Emercise eventa. Ex 39: Rumor Control A Call So.r d Operators tusite function. Irrelevant (see Ex 38.0 above) had indccordte/ outdated to I.ERO trainings factually i n f uoia t t ori; answered in-tsa n e l e s s. The few inrtences quirier, too slowly or in-of superseded information re-correctly (ENC-O-12 Insuf-su.ted from an equipment prob ~ ficient copying capabill-tem. New procedures and bet-tiab at ENC resulted in de-ter copying capability should Idys in distributing infor-obviate problem, matton tu rumor control personnel) f B:

1. A t e sesponses to simu-Onsite function.

Irrelevant lated r e,wo r messages to training conclusory and factually baseless. Responses t o.nassages were as expeut-ttous as accuracy woulo 411ow. Personnel acted a c c 44. d t ng to procedures. \\ ? C: Huros Control personnel Onsite function. Irrelevant (see EX 38.B above) pr ov iduc i n.s c c u - to training. Inf orraa t ion pro-rete / superseded inf orma t t orn vided was generally timely and (ENC-D-1; Insufficient Correct. Isolated instances copying capabilities at ENC 'of inaccurate information were resulted in delays 1si babed primarily on an equip-distributing in f o#wra t ion to ment problem. New procedures rumnr contiof per sonne 1) and better copying c a.pa b i l i t y should obviate problem. Ex 44: (1st boutsoce c ori-Irrelevant to training. Fac-solidated with LX 30 and tually baseless. Exercise Ex 39F railure to provide t.. ants do not support allega-accuras,, iluar' inform.etlon tton of a substantial evacum-5 would c r e.s t e a sutar.t an t t a l tion shadow. evacumtlun " shadow" En2N: false absumption Irrelevant to training. of no premature uvacuation Conclusory allegation not

  • ~""#

based on Exercise events.

y ? LY W IN RtWIN C7 LILLD 2 & 2 PTUlFICATI(NS, RAC IGNIDI C7 IDO VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS VEpwrIM IN RAC RLVIm KDIFICATIONS T HENS 7 & 8 MX)IFICATIONS W i I j l j (see EX 38.8) i l 1 I i i j (s.e ex 38.8) l r TI APERTUllE (see EX 38.8) CARD Al.ao Available On Aperture Card i 1 l 8709010330 -4 3 I ___.______-___M

b, DATA ANJ (.UUutt!(N CITtI) AND K101FICATIO4S IN IA70 C0fuesP00DG FDM (Irt1LNr STA'IUS AS SUPKET FOR DC 50.E PICOM,EE 6 NNDU 33 g Ex 40:_ Plan talls to irrelevant to training issue, provide for timely evacuee Cord ent ion EX 40 concerns ade- .Ssistance quacy of Plan and Procedures and presents no factual sup-port on issue of esercise of Indeponoent judgment by LERO personnel. A: Fersuant to Plan and ~Id. Procedures Trafftc Guides were nat mobilized until after ceclar tton of Site Area Lmergency Bs Pursuesst to Procedurem -Id. Trafttc Guides were not de-ployed ontiI atter evacua-t t on reconut endat t on C: EBS message issued pur-Id. suant to the Plan falsely told public Traffic Guides would be in place Di Not admitted. Et LERO " fin" would not irrelevant to training in.ue, currect problems with Traf-Conclusory allegation not fic Guide mobilization and based on Esercise events. deployment. Ex 4t: Tsoffic I mpe d i anen t s As Slom mobilization of I r r e l e v.3n t s no t a t ra i n i;ig Road Crews problem. Factually baseless. Sufficient Road Crews were mo-bilized in accordance with procedures. j^ Oth "h zu Ba Pat tur e to respond ade-Duplicative of Contentions Traffic Engineer added to o quately to two ruud impedt-1:X 42.0 and EX 45.A. Facts do EOC. LERO Traffic Control ments: (1) C unwi.un i c a t i on s not demonstrate a pervasive Tabletop orill V (Rev. May, fattures at EOC (EOC-D-l: training flaw. Isolated in-1986) and PAR / Accident Man-Detays in responding to two stances of communciations agement Tabletop Drill !!! evacuattun l enpe d i nie n t s ) problems readliy correctable (Rev. Aug. 1986) emphasize by revisions in LERO proce-responding to evacuatinn dures and training. impediments including com-munication of information, equipment requirements, re-sponse priorities, and al-l I tornate traffic routing. LEHO Clas. room Training l Program materials for Ses-slon B. "1raffic Contiol" (Rev. July, 1986) empha-sizes corrununicat ion of in-formation and timely re-sponse to evacuation imped-iments. escg

@ BY RAC IN le/IIW & LIIID } 7 6 8 HUIFICATICNS, RAc mygfu a tz;O VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS 3 VDOWTIM IN BAC EVIIW E IFICATIGE & IEVS 7 6 8 DIFICATICNS i l l 1 ) i Q*j .30 .o a ; / j U,o .t 7 o LERO Murpun.e ( ACTION) f'EMA Evaluesion of.4180 Seepunse I$ us cocsdures have t.e en $/26/86 Adequately address the ts-The plan has been revised to A i 1 oviews4 and revised sues re,lsed in the ener-add a traf fic engineer to the i e ensure information cise. etaff at the EOC to evaluate I C trpediments to any poselble t aped t eent e to 1 I nurptly pissed to att evacuation and to make recoe-clavant personnel and sendettone on necessary changes > coordinated re s ponse to evacuation routes in Cp t smeated, in addt-resp 9 nee to potentist tapedt- .lsa, a Treffte

mente, precedures for ftold rIaI e,in,s, h.e 6ee.

.o,te,e, i.e., hue d,teers, g traffic guides, etc., have been XDdsd to the tIno EOC ri natt to assigt in A modified to include teatruc-yesluiting and p p ttone to make prompt not8i1-1systoping alternate Ur AL cations through their commual-ma ing. cation network of any potential ts pediment. Provisions have k) Trafff; Cuidance $/26/86 been made to taeue an Esa Also AvaIlable On mess.,e in the eve.t that tble Try TT4 has dpCflHTC (3rd chngo to necuat t u toutu 3a modified to locarporate the are necessary. ) Ocogre to the pro-communications withia ( Oduras. Attachment Internet l ). the LERO KOC regarding leesse-maat of and response to evacua-f atoe tapedimente have been edequa t el y addressed through i 8709 010 3 30 -(py j

. DATA A14Al (Df!M(r104 CIM AIO TDIt'ICATICNS IN U30 3 CORRESPOIODIG FDiA (1 MENT STA1tJS AS SUPIORP FOR EX 50.E Pirni 18:S & TRAINING As g.g ) j l i n e s-l l .J:: l EE l .: t $ .a l a j l (2) Delay in field Minor and readily corrected by LERO Traffic Control proce-ARCA 1 i verification of fuel truck revisions in LERO procedures dures have been revised to j impediment (LOC-ARCA-9: and training. expedite dispatch of per-Delay in field verification sonnel responding to inct-l of fumi truck impediment) donts identified by.the EOC. LERO field personnel now receive training with increased enophasis on re-sponses to evacuation im-pediments. Modifications-have been made ins (1) LERO Evacuation Route Spotter Tabletop Orill.111 (Rev. May, 1986): (2) LERO Staging Area Management Tabletop Dr.ll III (Rev. May.'1986): (3) LERO Traf-fic Control Tabletop Drill V (Rev. May, 1986): .l - (4) LERO Classroom Training Program materials f or 1 Session 8 " Traffic Con-trol" (Rev. July. 1986). l 't .rg ._._____m_._______..______:__; ______________1__________

/ I DY RAC IN REVUM 0F LIlut P 6 8 Mf01FICATIGiS. RAC F1VIIM T IIIO VLMMTDi RAC ANALYSIS VEHt ATI#1 IN BAC HLynM MX)IFICATIOG T RENS 7 6 8 KDIFICATIQ6 modification to the proceeures (esp. Of!F 3.6.3, Traf fic Con-trol). The Evacuation Route Coordinator la responsible for obtaining periodic updates f ree +- the Evecuatloa toute Spottere, and lamediately reporties road impediments or other problems to the Traffic Control Co-ordinator and Road legistice Coordtaator (see Or!F 3.6.3, Sec. S.6.7). Saad Traffic Culdee (et the etsging areas) are to report any incident that has the potential for slowing the evacuation based os reporte o free Tral!!c Guides in the fleid to the Traffic Control Point Coordinator la the LERO EOC (Ortr 3.6.3, "s. S.3 6). 1,,w actification of a road tapediment from the Evocussion Route Coordinator, the Road Lagistics Coordinator le re-eponsible for ensuring that en adequate number of suitable road crew vehicles are die-patched te respond to the lopedimens (see Ortr 3.6.3, Sec. S.S.ic). The plan modification ade-querely addresses the leaves taleed in the esercles. Effec-tive see of these plan modif t-cations shuui.1 be evaluated at -e d etwee vuorelev.- - e.-. ,, g .3' $Ub 3.3 P.* n; 1:1 ona

    • 1

\\ .g

=

.k h @ Re sponse ( ACTION) iTMA Evalualinn of LERO Respuose IE u 4

n sr. s and train-9/1/66 Adequately anddr e s s the en-The plan has been modified (see A

g win s au revloed to ercise issue. Or!P 3.6.3 Sectione 3.1, S.2.6 ew fiesibility in and 5.4.2), to assure that ett ponnai essignment. lapedimente to evacuation will 1 ) will ensure that be promptly

reported, that

\\ Juanet are immedi-additional personnel are dio-ly dispatched for Patched la ar* expedited manner, sdiment verifica-and that there le coordinatloa m or other avecum-between the Traffic Control Co-o enigency; ),[ ordinator, the Evacuation Coor-dinator and the Evacuation APElleFURE aoute Coordiretor. The E.acu.- tion Route Coordiastor la (,,.k k h responsiste for obtaining pert-e.d l e updates true Evacustlom Route Spotters (dee OPIP 3.6.3, Section S.6.7). The plea modt-Also Available On "c"'*" d " a**8r ddr*** the amorcise issue. The g PCfilt ria, Ord effectiveness of training of the Evaluation Baute Coor-dinator and communications with Route Spottare vie Steglag Areas should be evaluated at a future esercise.

8709 0103 30 y y

\\ 1 DATAAlh GImNrlO4 CITED AND an)IFICATICNS IN U3O i CORRE:SIO{ DING R NA 0-SMRS AS SUPIORP FDR EX 50.E PHX11UES & TRAINING AS 9 M 8 I ^n aE35 .3U .ta u 5*N. ( :.l ) Appr opr id t e Fdctually baseless. Personnel LERO Traffic Control Tab-ANCA l personnel out dispatched to and equipment required to tetop Drill V (Rev. May. ] r eehu v e multiple wehicle oc-

t. l ear talocked road were sent 1986) emphas lees convuunica-cident road impediment to accident. Facts do not tion directly between the (PSA-ANCA-B; Appropriate demonstrate e training flaw.

EOC and Road Crews to en-personnel not dispatched Any problems were minor and sure appropriate response. t o c iudr inui t tpl e vehicle remdlly correctable by revi-accident road impediment) sions in LERO procedures and LERO Classroom Training training. Progreim matarlais for Session 8 " Traffic Coatrol" trains traffic control personnel, including Road Crews, to communicate by radio with the Road Logis-tics Coordinator at the EOC. l ) l i i I Cs Not admitted, l Da Hot admitted. l E Addition of Traffic En-Irrelevant to training. glover to EOC would not Conclusory allegation not eliminate flaws in dealing based on Emercise events. with rodd impediments Ex 221; (dealt with under Ex 41) Erroneous assump- ~10. j l i tton that tERO needs to be able tu deel with only two road impediments EX 42 (Det.p _ incor por agg h Ex 38 & Ex 39) At untimely / ineffective Duplicative of Contentions (see EX 41.0 above) response to road impedi-Ex 41.0 and Ex 45.A. ments (EOC-D-Is Delays in responding affectively to road i mped i ms.)t s ) i sp*v

I h BY IW: IN l@VI W C:P LIIID 3 7 & 41 MU!FICATICNS, F/C IGVIW OF LEIO VERBATIM PJC ANALYSIS 3 VD6tATIM IN RAC IGNID4 MX)IFICATIO S & HEVS 7 & 8 M EIFICATl M l I x-e q :.: .h O .5 OS* 30. g s :; 13 2;g %3 l $V a?S A}t U FEMA Evalualion of lea 0 sespunee IE 3j )R3 asspunse ( ACTION) i l ter reed crews are N/A Adequately d tid r # b s t imes wa* LER0's response le adequate to A 1 epitched to their' ercise issue. address the laeue of inappro-end pusistons (i.e y priate equipment being sent to hamualcate vle redte respond to the impediment )th the EOC. The pro 5tes introduced in the ener- )rd Traf fic Culdes et else. Plan revletone made in Area do response to deftetency t. ERG EOC p St,tstag t decids which I should be sufficient to en-e to be die-sure timely response to evacue- {steheare tion tape diment e. Procedure it c hsd to a particu-r irrediment. OrtP 3.6.1, Sec. 5.5.40 has been added and now makes clear i that once dispatched free their l prestaged locatten so respond j to en impedleent probles, road crews are to be in radio con-tact with t t>e EOC. The paad Crew Procedure (assach. 2 of OPir 3.6.3, Sec. 6, page 2 of

2) opecifies that Boed Crews are to contact the Road togletice Coordinator at the EOC if problems arise.

The effectiveness and LERO worker knouledge of these procedures should be erstamted at a future esercise. i l t 1 l l TI APERTURE CARD (6ee E.X 41.B) ) &lth))g (jg I % au 8709010330 -46

DATA W CCNMff!ON CIMD A#O 90DIFICATICNS IN 1430 1 coRpsStag)ING IDIA CD9 eft UIAnlS AS SUPKne 50.E PimmyES & 'IPAINING AS 6 Ew f m ~.0 1 00 .E-Nj 8 e $, B: Untinsty/inedequate re-Duplicative of Contention LERO pr ocedures modif ied to ARCA-I bponsw to Ridge School EX 45.8. Factually baseless, ensure additional staff-are j evacuation message Dispatch of bus 33 minutes used to assist the Spectat j (PSA-ARCA-ll Forty min. after receipt of request at Populations Eus Dispatcher. doldy in dis-patching Bus PSA was timely under circum-LERO Classroom Tralning ma-j Driver.to evacuate schoot

stances, terials for Session 9 J

children) " Transportation t Coordinator" and " Pro-tactive Actions for Special Populations" emphasize need for assistance in sapediting special popula-tion buses. Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletops also emphasize this. C Anabillty to handle Duplicative of Contention une.pected aumorb EX 39. mos o "lf Ou itt 1 am D4 Inability of Traffic Readily correctable by revi* LERO Classroom Training Guides to respond to sions in the LERO procedures Program matorisia for ^"C" ovacuse questions and training. Session 8 " Traffic Control" (PSA-ARCA-7: Traffic (Rev. July, 1986) now Guides lacked complete in-trains Traffic Guides to formatnon on the appropri-instruct evacuees to i1 sten sto destination for to the EBS radio station evacuees for evacuation information including evacuation desti-

nations, LERO Identifica-tion Badge for Traffic Guides, listing job-related duties on the back, in-structs them to advise evacuees to listen to the EBS station l

l r %ses8" SM

_y 1 l BY MAC IN EVIW W 1.IIG L6 6 K1DIFICATIO6.' RAC EVIW & IIiO VEREATIM FUC INALYSIS j m aTix IN nAc mvIm . MODIFICATIG6

  1. "7'O O**

..O .5 S"- gq .5' j 12" 2; 8 o .- ~ 6 e kugo )Brspunes(ACTical) itMA Evolust ion el LOO teopense 4" plos e util be 9/1/86 Aduquately address thu va-The plan hee been modified 'in A I ped to. indicate en orcism issue. OPir 3.6.5. Sec. 5.8.2. to in-Olonel LF.ao staff struct the fetciel Populet tore 20 util esetet the sue Diepetener to se6tgn. e Det , Populations Transfer rotat Coordinator to Ditettcher. eastet in briefing drivers to eseurs a more timely dispatch. ' These plan modifications which odequetely addrene the esercise teoue should be evaluated et a future esercies. 1 i l l l k i o ~ c .5" 0C0 l .5 X". i g; 2%8

gg 33%

tt p 3raponse ( ACT10eO l FEMA Evolust ion of LOO Response I$ "{1

=

u us l Traffic Guide Pro-9/1/86 Adequately address the en-Tm plan has been modified. A I tre util be modt-arcise issue. Ortr 1.6.3 Attachment 8 Sec. 1 3 in see. 8. i 10 to instruct the traffic guides to inform evacuees. to listen to the EBS radio station l for the latest emergency to-j formation, j The plan modificotton ode-l quotely address the esencise issue. The knowledge of l traffic. guides to instruct I evacuese to listen to the EBS Station for information should be evaluated at' a future . ena s.. TI APERTURE CARD Also AvaHable on Aperterre Card sq09 0103 8U ~4 7 -__-------___m___,--,_-__----a._._------------------_-----_----a,m---_---------2 -_---_--~~----a--_-,m-----:._.___u---- -x--,,-____r-


,-.--1__

  • r. *%.

(ATA ANA mmNrlO4 CI'n:D AND WOIFICAT104S IN LEfD l 00Rastoonc m4A Cu+1Nr STARS AS SUPFOfG' TOR EX 50.E PIW MS & TRAINING AS 6 ^ 00h 1u3g a M S MJ D. (cont.) Inability of Facts do not demonstrate a Traffic Guides now wear ARCA Treffic Guides to know en-pervasive flaw in LERO LERO Identification Badges cows dube authoriza*lon tralnlog program. Minor. Iso-enumerating radiological procedure (PSA-ARCA-16: lated incidents reddlly cor-procedures on the back for Traffic Guides did not un-rectable by revisions in LERO quick reference in the derstond uncebb dose autho-equipment and training. field. The Dodge clearly rigettun procedures) states that they will re-ceive authorization for en-cess esposure from the Lead Traffic Guide. Escess dose authorization procedures are now emphasized in re-vised LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3, " Personnel Dosimetry and Exposure Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986). OI^h 03 bh a:a En Some Dum Drivers failed LERO procedures and training Ous Drivers are now as-p to carry out their assigned have been modified to ensure signed routes randomly in duties (PSA-D-63 Bus Driv-that every Dus Driver is capd-order to familiarize them ers duleyed, went to wrong Die of driving any raridoml y with a variety of routes tr ansf er point, or missed assigned route. they might be called on to segment of d u b luried route) drive. Transfer Point Coordinators now check bus dispatch forms upon Driver's arrival to confirm that the Driver is at the correct transfer point. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Session 9, " Transportation Coordination" (Rev. July. 1986), the Transportation Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) and the Staging Area Man-agement Tabletop (Rov. May, 1986) emphasize that Bus Drivers report to the Transfer Point Coordinator for verIttcation of the aus l Dispatch Farm to ensure I that the Driver is at cor-l rect l oc a t t or. l Bus Driver Driving Instruc-l tion Traiaang (Rev. May. l 1986) emphasizes the new l vertftcation procedures. t The session includes a Field Practical in which each Driver runs a route to designated check locations, wo

1 W'1N EVI1W CF IJIID ' > 8 MfUIFICATICNS, W RWI1W Cr LDO N TIM W ANALYSIS PATIM D RAC EVIEW KEITICATICNS - T IEVS 7 6 8 MVIFICATICNS 1:( z 30

1 C:

g:a: HI qt s e e sa W Tim ) FEh4 Evaluat ien of LERO Seepense I$ u$ 12 Roe response le adequate. A 1 Dschogue St.iging N/A Since the lesse relates to les I). l training of smergency workers regarding e s posure control. LElt0's commitment to emphaatse thle aspect 'in its training to troponstve. The ef festiveness of LERO's emergency worker radiological esposure control treintog should be evaluated at a future esercise. lb.' 8 .e

P
3.

4.- 13" 1:1 E 2*% . ?. ?. .i t m gg ku Despunss (ACT10el) FEMA Evalualion of 1230 Ret punse I[ .ma w ) investigetton 3/1/86 Adequately address the ts-The plan has been revloed. OPir A I CD probles re-sues raised in the eser-1.6.4 Sec. S.S.41, to require ) thst during Cise. the bue drivere to show their drills bus del-Dispatch Form to t he Transfer 1 have repeatedly Point Coordinator to assure testsd to go to that the drivere have reached esse transfer the correct location. Thie ) and bus yarde. verification of arrival et the tiny had not desired trenefer potat la also a festilar with covered in the Transfer point ) ather poselble Coordinator's Procedure j lons. LILCO will (Attachment 1 Sec. 7 of Orl? cosd rallice" to 3.6.4). the bus drivers I lariss thsteelves These plan modification ede-stlar bus yarde quately address the esercise rensfer potate. leaves sad should be evaluated at a future esercles. to futura. emer-j ptsparednese )ng will force ces of different 1st potats and yards. The ler Fulat Coor- ] cr Frucedure will APERTURE

e ihu 6u, die-eur.s

.,e to se ad upon driver *m {QQ ,l. sn u.. i. 4 Also Available On 'hporture Card 8709 010 3 30. _G g o

b DATA ANAL UJm2RIGl CI'!TD APD PODIFICATICNS IN IIRD . C Q)f50EIGODC EDIA OMBE STAns AS SUPIORT FOR IX 50.E PPD 3DUME 6 TRAINDG AS E {= l 0Ia dh ' g4 5b*h NjJ_ f: Trettic Guides arrived Factually baselebs. Traffic Traffic Guides are now D late at control points Guides critical to a con-prestaged for immediate (RSA-D-2: l#effic Guide trolled evacuation mantied dispatch within the 0-2 dslayed in arriving at con-their posts in a timely mile EPZ upon emergency trol pointh) fdshion. Irrelevant to declaration. LERO Traffic training issue. Any problem Control Tabletop Drill V was procedural. ProceGures (Rev. May. 1986) and have been modified. Staging Area Management Tabletop (Rev. May, 1986) emphasize prestaging and rapid deployment of Traffic Guldes in 0-2 mile EPZ. LERO Classroom Training Program materials for Ses-sion B " Traffic Control" (Rev. July, 1986) ampha-sizes pre-equipping and pre-assigning of Traffic Guides. i 8 I ^6 W:; $ uo=:- ';; a g .u s ~ wu l ! 5o$j r .ssroom Training AHCA F. (con.4) Dub Drtvers not irrelevant to training issue. L = dibpatched in timely Drivers were dibpatched f.% em meterials for j i fashion (PSA-ARCA-Is Bus according to procedures. Session 9 " Transportation drivers not dispatched Problem related to quantity of Coordination" (Rev. July. <en t i l 2 houe6 after emer-trained personnel available to 1986) now emphasizes that l iency declaration) assist Dispatcher in distribu-Transfer Point Coordinator tion of dostmetry. FEMA rec-assist Bus Dispatchers with i ommended additional personnel distribution of materials be provided to assist.in bus and dosimetry in order to dispatching. Bus dispatch expedite dispatch of Bus procedures have been modt!.ed Drivers. to provide additional help. The Transportation Tabletop and Staging Area Management Tabletop Drilla (Rev. May. i 1986) emphasize need for assistance in rapid dis-li. patch of buses. Dosimetry Tabletop Drill VI (Rev. Nov. 1986) emphastres need for rapid distribution of dosimetry to large groups such as Bus Drivers, vv.

Y iW: IN REVIIM & LII1D 6 8 N OIFICATIG E, RY IONID4 & IDO VEM.lATIM RAC ANALYSIS ATIM IN RAC RENIIM KDIFICATIGE CF IGNS 7 6 9 P0DI.FICATIWS p o ^ OCU c o E*" 5" .$55 555

  • 1%
  • 28 i l 2:*

hsponse ( ACT1000) l FEMA Evaluat lea of.LDO Response E$ /j E. c Guidas will be $/26/86 Adequately address the 6.- Edification of proceduree OPIP A I julpped for imme-suas raised in the essr-1.6.) and OPIP 4.$.1 to recruit . dispatch for the CI68-at least three (3) non-assigned ~ 3 h.P Z. An addl= traffic guides to sealet in the j 1 person wLit be distributt<m of field kite is bed to asetet adequate to address thle eser-9quipment distri-clee fesue. b. .r:- i. r a ., o .o.- ,8 guw g, c-- E3% EUI ig*

a. t

? ?.

sp E o a6.

eo Ov epense ( ACTION) FEMA Evalvet ion el LDO geopense I[ f$7 .= w is no require-M/A Reserved dectaton pendin9 j Ff.MA and the RAC have reviewed g g i to d i s pat c h bus completton of further aiditional information supp!!ed ice within two modificistion of LEko procu-by LItio regarding this leave i of a Site Area dures to assure timely and hase changed the original pacy. The dis-tar le f ings and di s t r itsut t on rating in the report from a ) of bus drivers of dostmetry to Bus Driv-Delictency to en Area Bequiring within the times ers. Corrective Actior.. As die- , led in the LERO cussed in the esercise report, see analyste of the delays in dispatching bus )tch, Attn heent drivera were d ue to issuing doelmetsy and to delaye 8 st briefing the number of per-

sonnel, bue delvers and transfer potat coordinators, prior 44 dispatching.

FEMA

recognises that there is no r equi reme nt within the plea to dispatch bue drivers free ***

Staging Area within two (, hours of a site Aree Emergey. FEMA also recognises that step S.3.4 of OrlP 1.6.4 req:st r es [ the sus Coordinator (et the LERO 1%C), se directed by the APERTURE tr -e Pon s i i-Surra - r-dinator, to begin septemente. CARD oon o< 6e oeer=tio o et the Site Area tm tgency; and that the first buses are t o be die 4 pa t c hed tros the Trenefer ~ Also Avnllablo On "Tiuur aW the ~'o"e (85 a v'" < P0 flute Card reco,nasttoe to e,easte th, l public. h over, the Bus Dis-patcher (s) at the Steglag Arese are responsible with the seslotence of uncoentsted + Transfer Potnt Coordinator not streeJy dispeiched froe t he 8709016330 -67 _ _ _ _ m._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _.. _ _ _. _ _ _

i%. % DATA ANAINZI KOIPICATIONS IN U30 IEV OJm2TI'lO4 CIMD Ato (DimESPOODC fD4A (DMm STATUS AS SUPIOle KR EX 50.E PRXIIX.MS & TRAINI'C gg l l G; ENC putzunnel fdited to Dupilcative of Contention rubpond appropeiste1y to Ex 38. th2d ie queh t i ons ww up -._J

/ RAC IN REVI!M OF IJIID 1 MUIFICATIO6, RAC IGVIIM *CF IEFO VEN. TIM PAC ANALYSIS /WTIM IN RAC It. IIM KDIFICATICNS (F REVS 7 4, 8 KDIFICATIO4S V Staging Area (see OPir 1.6.4, section S.S.8) - for briefing bue drivers sad verif yin's that they are properly equipped with a bue driver packet and dos-lettry. The buses evaluated on the day of the esercise were able to complete their routes l uithin the time tramec set l forth in the plan. However, it l is FEMA's judgment that the dispatch of bus drivere from the Staging Areas must be espedited so that buses will be avstlabte for dispatch from the transfer pointe to complete their evacuation routes within the pruscr ibed time frames in all scenarios. The Sue Dis-patcher (s) apparently did not adequately use uncommitted Trapater ruint Coordinature in die 3atching Bua Drivere from alw Staging Arca (se requircJ by Rection S.S.8 of OPir i 1.6.4). Based on further analysis of information made available by LtLCO, FEMA deter-eined that the Evacuation Co-ordinator did not issue instructions to prestage buses to the Transler rotate until one hout and twenty alputea siter the Site Ares Eme r ge nc y wee known to personnel at the LERO EOC (see page 86 of LILCo's First Baquest for Adelssions and Third Set of f Interrogatories Directed to Suffolk County, liew York Store and the Town of Southampte,, dated December I, 1986). T.s e le contrgry to Section 5.1, of f Ofir J.6.4 which require the Manager of Local Respotse to direct the Evacuation Coor-dinator to begin the pressaging of busse to some or all of the Transfer Pointe upon declara-tion of a Site Area the r ge nc y. Ilence. LERO did not follaw :ha plan (i.e., utilles available resources and/or make use of training) and thle esercise leeue ulti remain unresolved NitNOtaMr 7titure assure timely briefings and l r distriburton of doelmatry under all scenarios to the large h number of bus drivers required 3 2 to be dispatched free the QQ ratchogue Staging Ar e si. The effectiveness of and tralatng in these plan modification should be evaluated et a future Also Available On aerc 8 a - ' Aperture Card 8709 0103 30 -7D =

DATA ANA!A G2ITNTICN CI'I1D AP0 Pr0!FICATICNS.tN LEFO C] (Di4HEEKRODC fDtA CEt9Cff STA'UE AS SUPPORT Pm DC 50.E PHOORMS & TRAINIlO - AS STA Ex 45: (cnnmolidated with Ex 50) At Cornmun l # attons failures Duplicative oF Contentions (see EX 41.8 above) in response. to traffic im-EX 41.0 and EX 42.A. pediment messages (EOC-D-1: Delays in responding to two evacuatton impedimenta EOC-ARCA-9 Delay in fJuld verification of fuel truck impediment) Di Conununico t t una tallures Duplicative o* Contention (see EX 42.0 above) in response to bchool evac-Ex 42.0. Factually beseless. uation methbege Dispatch of. bus 33 minutes (PSA-AHCA-II: Forty minute after recolpt of request at delay in dispatch of B 4s PSA was timely under circum-Driver tu vvscuate school stances. chiIdren) ~oe m 0:::3 l b z:hs C Fa l lui e to nutify FAA L 1rrelevant to training conten-LERO will implement the new ARCA LIRH (EOC AHCA-2: tion. Procedures were a recommendation that it. Confumlun ewyerding the followed during the esercise. contact FAA directly. A method of nottfying FAA FEMA subsequently recommended letter of agreement with a new notification procedure FAA will be obtained and (RAC Review. Dec. 15, 1986). EOC personnel designated and trained to communicate with FAA. !2._;_ ~16\\ to

gi!

!f 2: C (C: cont.) EOC-ARCA-3: Irrelevant to training conten- 'LERO procedures have been Anc4. LIRH was not.notifled) tion. Procedures were fol-modified. 'lhe Evacuatton s lowed during the esercise. Coordinator notifies LIRR 1 of emergency status. LERO l l Accident Management Tab-letop Drill emphasizes new responsibility of Ev.cus-tion Coordinator to notify LIRR. -- y m _._ _ ____ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _. _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _

.s t W RAc rw avtm cr utan !6 d M OIPICATIOE, RAC REVIDI & IEO VLWlATIM RAC ANALYSIS /EMATIM IN BAC MNIW . K O FICATIO S CF HEVS 7 6 8 Mr1FICAT106 l j I 1 (see EX 41.0) l (sue Ex 42.0) l t w-mSnC I . "5

  • uuw l

.e uw I l

  • t.

gt; .3 e%S E3% g j ?. oaa .a it l 28 % Brspunsa ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluatits el LEB0 Etapunse I 0$ u FAA wt!! be con- ' $/26/86 Reserved decision. RAC A letter of agressent O' h the 1 1 i sd se part of t he made new recommendations .AA has been withdrawn by j FRYRP response. mhtch LERO is implementing. LILCO, etace responetbility for i plea tad training mottiteetion of the FAA hae l ,1 be modified been shifted to the U.S. urdirgly es part uf Department of Transportation . 7. (007) via FEMA se recommended in the review of Rev. S of the plan. 16ove ve r, based on results of the Feb. 43, 1986 i l smeretse and the SAC review of subsequent plea revistoms it 4e recommended that 1.180 motify l FAA directly (see commente for element F.I.c in the ples review.of Revistoe 8), la order to assure the moet steely nottftcettoo of

FAA, LE80 ebuuld egeta obtain a letter of agreement with FAA.

Tretning of LERO pe rsonee t responsible for notiftestine of FAA should be veritted at a l future esercise. d-c g heRaMe '2 = ff %,E Q uo*t. Dl!Te On't ES o E*" 1:1

gg
  • 3%

ono .5

  • gg k0E lC l'eepunes ( ACTION)

FEMA' Evelvat ion of.LERO Respuese I $___.d M f proc *durs will 1,e 9/1/86 Planning provisions are ed-The.plas has been modified to g g )0f tsd in Sev. 8 to equate. LERO should obtain include sottitcattom of the 'Budi e phone call a letter of understanding 9 tong' la2end Rattroad (LIRE). the L!st. LEcto from LIRR. Proc 64ure OFIF ).3.2, Page 4 of !! sing trt!! be mod!" At%echment 4, instructs t he j %eccordingl* Support serviced Coordinator to F i I contact the LINE st the Ale r t, or higher emergency cleestitc6-8709 010 3 30 ~~I/ tion, and to request closure m;! ,.rt. of th. tan o if ..ar-

l usttoes are called for 1r l

i. [ certein secture. = L____________________________._

b DATA ST unturrl(N CITED Ato KOIFICATICNS IN LDO CORRESTUDIE miA GI+E2fr STAnIS AS SUPIORP 10R EX 50.E PHOCkILUES & THAINING AS g 0.I. ^5 0:: g 'O %" :g: 8 2.y D: Fa t los e to distinguish Irrelevant to training conten-Dose Assessment st&tus ARCA betnoen DOE RAP dnd LILCO tton. Facts involve equip-board has been revised to field muriitortny on dose

ment, separate data from DOE RAP assessment status board and LILCO field monitoring (EOC-ARCA-4; Not anough teams.

A meeting was held columna un dose assessment with DOE representatives on status board to keep 00E Jan. 6 1987 to review the RAP and LILCO data sepa-use of new status board. rated) 2._ "1$ 0: S E *5 '; a g u w 5 $ {6e Dunnaind dibtance of Isolated instance of hur <an AlI downwind distances now APCA dose measurement errone-error caused by a decimal teported directly in miles ously reported as 7000 me-point misplaced during conver- =lthout need to convert to ters instead of 700 rne t e r s. ston of distance units. Po-mete"$. This was reviewed (EOC-ARCA-La Downwind dis-tentla? for error reouced by d.sring the LILC0/ DOE meet-tance of a thyroid dose thange in procedures, ing on Jan. 6 1987. b anip l e tucursectly reported as 7000 meters instead of 700 meters) i W '* J

BY RAC IN REVIW T LIIID 7 & d PEUIFICATIGE. R/C IGNIW T 1220 VERDATIM RAC ANALYSIS VEPhATIM IN RAC RLVIW MX)IFICATIOG T ICVS 7 & 8 MJDIFICATIWS l Figure ? 3.4 spectites that the l tang letand Battroad will be [ nottfled at the site Aree Emer-gency and/or General Emergency ECLs. The Litt should also be added to Fig. 3.3.3 and to the nottiteetion diagres shown in Fig. 3.1.5. Thces planning prov&olona are adequate but point of contact ered telephone sunber for actificat tom of the appropriate LitA offletal(s) should be documented with a letter of understanding between LERO and the tong letand tail-road. Training of LERO per-sonnen responsible for nottit-cetlue of 1.l t t should be _us14144_at#4a.s._mu.te.,_; = 2C ~ -< og 30! OS~ gt: .5 13 2:a P 4%e mo geo u l@ Respuuse (ACTION) FEMA Evalualion of.LDO Respunee 4C 0E dose assessment 9/4/86 Adequately address the en-1220's moutf tcation of the dose A I k ad witt be mcdi f ied ercise issue, assessment s t at ue board to accum odete d"a accommodate date from both o both 00E-f tp 00E/RAF tomme end LILCO teaua cm and Lit.Co seese, to adequate, Tretning of the LEED dose se6esoment staff to aske effective was of the modified status board should be evaluated at a futura ev itcies. a o

  • n-

.i .5* 33" 30. Ee* 13 E%*

3 2"

s$

?!
p aoe U

eo D 8espons (ACTION) FEnt Evaluat ion of LERO Respones 4f OE satsrlet for 9/l/06 Adequately address the en-Proced.e OPIP 1.5.2, 'Section A 1 useisstun of fleid trcise issue. 3.5 has been revised to specify a u!!! be reviewed that all distances reported by oneure LERO and Dog DOE-RAF teams are to be etices are con-recorded in alles. Gest. To t,e in-fed in Rev. 4. APERTURE ~ The plan modifications ade- ,ustei, su ress the,seulee leeue. Ieples*etation of thte UtRD che se shouid 6e e.atuated.t a future esercise. Also Arnthble Ou ' Aperture Oced 8709010330 -72.- - ~. _. -

6 DATA C$ CEl m NTION CI'IYD AND PfDIF? CAT 106 IN LDO Cn'UESKtOING nMA CDt4NP STA1US AS SUPfoRr FOR Er 50.E PAH4!S 6 '!HAINING AS: n OI^. >. O

  • uv$

3:- h-i $ $ #'l Extrapolated doses Minor and readily correctable Procedure now calls for ARCA errunsously reported as ac-by revisions in LERO proco-Identification of-data upon 1 tual doses on status board. dures and training, receipt at EOC as ar' al or (EOC-ARCA-bi Extrapolated extrapolated. DOE 4 / per < dose data were reported as sonnel were notified of actuel s 6esebut emesnt s on s t a-change in reporting proce-tus boaro) dure at the LILCO/ DOE meet-ing on Jan. 6 1987. E: 5ets u t ar y did not de-Ir.s i gn i f icant. Noted but not i liver telwpnone message cited in FEMA Assessment as prumptly to LLHO Director deficiency or ARCA. Secretary's actions did not contravene any LERO procedure. Massages designated by the caller as urgent would be im-mediately conveyed to the Ol-rector. F Connuni ca t ions f a i lur es Duplicative of Contentions of ENC, Putal tc Irif orma t i on. Ex 38 and Ex 39. and Rumor Control personnel o i 0 I6 N 'O $" I &5 I! G: Falture of RSA person-Failure to post time of update LERO Staging Area Manage-ARCA l nst to properly record was minor and readily cor-ment Tabletop Drill III I event inf ormation on status rectable by modifications in (Rev. May. 1986) now empha-l board. tRSA-ARCA-1: Time training. slaes posting time of'up - was not elweys included dated information on status unen new information was

board, poste t' e status board)

H ed i.o reception at Factually baseless. Irrele-Pus t Jetterson Staging Area vant to training contentton, was poot end disrupted "es-Based on sporadic radio recep-sentnel" c onmiun i c a t i on 6 tion problem. Noted but not cited in FEMA Assorsment &b deficiency or AHCA, ww 1

) BY W IN REVilM T !.IllD 7 & t.' $9 01FICATI(.tE. E r le V11M & ID O VERDATIM RAC ANALYSIS 9 VEF11ATIM IN PAC REVIIM KDIFICATIGE T REVS 7 & 8 KEIFICATIOG r ,o ~ n.. .,, 5

  • OUU c

=o vw

  • t.

gg; in" ", t, tt oao --a A$ "$3 j e$ Retpun,ar ( ACTIDss) FEMA Evaluat ion of.LERO Response 4c 0X i preceduree util 9/8/86 Adequately address the wa~ The ples het been modified. A 1 Dvtawed and e note arctae issue. Ortr 3.5 2. Section 3.6. to re- ) to escure better quire that uben field date to Dinition end received, the date la identi-l 7&te use et field fled as sa actual measurenset a Ta be lacor-or se car repolated date. All )cd la Rev. 8. estrepolated date are now to be posted.under " projected dete" on the status board. The plan modi'8aarlose ede-qisately address the esercise leeue. leptementation of this change should be vertfted at a future eserette.

~

c ..e .EU ^ -u- "t. 3.5 3~. 13 ~

  • "E 1:1

. $. 5 33'1 .1 =ag }RDResputist ( Actions) FEMA Eweluesson of.LERO Response IE hy etning meteriet ut!! 9/t/86 Adequately address the en-l LERO's response le adequate. A 3 modiftsd to ensure arcise issue, I The. effectiveness of trotning i iA. personnel put and use of the status board by I fees on latest infor* Personnel at the Riverhead { ): ton. Staging Aree should be evalu- ] l sted at a f uture esercise. l APERTURE CARD Also Anllalite Oh ' Aperture del 8709010830 -7) i

DATA ANA - GIfnN1104 CIMD Af0 KI)fFICATICNS IN IMO ( CORRESIOOING f1NA CD90ff STARIS AS SUPKRP FOR EX 50.E PIOCEDU3ES & T! WIN As g S I ^h 1 U5 t a:f( u Bus Dispatcher at Dispatcher's last minute re-LERO Staging Area Manage-ARCA j PSA made insccurate an-minders to Bus Drivers were ment Tabletop Drill III nouncements to Bus Drivers not complete but contained no (Rev. Way, 1986) now empna-about dosimetry inaccuracies of important in-sizes need for complete. (PSA-ARCA-123. Bus Dis-formation. Minor, isolated precise instructions at all patcher did not give instance not indicative of

times, j

des ima t ry uni t s nor snent ion pervasive training flaw. 0-200 MREM DRD ~ae n "3d l D5 l ':: : g i 0"t &2 Bus Driver misdl-Minor, isolated instance not LERO C lassroo.n T ra lning AucA rected at the BNL transfer indicative of pervasive Program materials for point. (P5A-ARCA-9: In-training flaw. Session 9 "Transportattun structions to proceed to Coordination" and " Pro-' [ Receptlun Center were not tactive Actions for Special i properly trenamitted at BNL Populations" (Rev. July, transfer putnt 1986) now emphasize the proper destinations for Bus Drivers. LERO Requalification Training Session 9 (Rev. July, 1986) trains Drivers j to proceed with evacuees tt Reception Centers. f LERO Staging Area Manage-ment Tabletop Drill III and Transportation Tabletop Drill (Rev. May, 1986) em-phasize training of Trans-for Point Coordinators to follow staging area direc-tions in instructing Bus Drivers. l. H In blitty to t r ansmi t Factually baseless. Problem currect information about originated with confilcting Suttolk Cuonty Police De-FEMA input into Emercise sce-pe r t wen t emmlatence net 10. h N* \\

' IN 14VllW T 1.1 LID 'T !)IV1 CAT 100 RAC fuYIIM T IEJO VEREMTIM RAC ANALYSIS IM IN RAC REVID4 KK)1FICATIO6 & HEVS 7 & 9 KDIFICATICNS Q** O n ~* c p uw wo

3.

g: 13%

0. ;. ?

qqt oao 21 ea pense ( ACTlON) Ff.MA Evalvetion uf LERO Respunse 4 c, goc U 'onnel going 9/l/86 Adequately adoress the en-Lll,CO's comeltment that train-A 1 c l field receive arcise issue. Ing of Lead Traf fic Culdes and )t ry briefing Rua Di s pat che r e will emphaelse y era leeued the need for giving prectee pieet r y. The e s posure control orsetings to Dffic Culdes' field workere le adequate. The Dis pee c he r s' effectiveness of thle training util be modi-should be evaluated at a future emphaelse the esercise. he more pre-eith their lun. 4.. o o ~ n c I OCO ".3 E~e X". "3 E*% SIo i IIE .3 3 % tt 2%* g5 punse fact 40N) gg.MA 1Evaluat ion of ERO Response I[ . k 0.E. u

enefer roint 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-The LERO response that Trenefer A

1 Cure' training orcise issue.

reint Coordinator training ut il t>e mod t-vill be modified to adequate.

> ensure they

The effectivenase of thle instructions l training should be evaluated at P SAC's to als I a future esercles.

are. TI APERT M CARD Also Available On Aperture Card 8709 010 3 30 - 7Y

w DAM ANAINITD WTIO4 C1'IED AND KUIFICATlas IN IMO ' 6~ . TSIOODO nMA OJM2f? FTARS AS SUPPORT 70R EX 50.E PK)CEDUES & TRAINING AS STM1D f l I d 1 l OIa c: 0

-Q uu
3

Inabillty to regis- 'O o $ end monitor evacuees LERO Redlulugical monitoring Factually baselessi monitoring LERO Classroom Training ma-ARCA TrainC ,uantly took too long, only occasionally took longer terials for Session 7 " Mon-w

ARCA-1:

Radiological than 90 seconds. LERO person-itoring and Decontamina- ,,pyc ltoring occasionally nel demonstrated ability to tion" have been revised to ,,,,,"pi longes than 90 seconds monitor evacuees in 90 sec-emphastae taking no longer ,gggy !. i t t ed in LERO proco-

onds, than 90 seconds to monitor

] ls) evacuees at Reception Con-

ter,

!l (domit with'under Irrelevant to training. Con-

9.A)

Insufflctent tention alleges deficiency in If at Reception Center quantity of perbonnel not their training.

Ability to obtain addt-3rrelevant to tralning.

Con-al monitoring personnet tantion is not based on Emer-other features of pur-cine eventh. Factually base-ed alternate monitoring less. Ability to secure addi-i not demonstrated tional monitoring personnel from INPO and essewhere was demonstrated. More per sons than ad-Factually baseless. ~d would seek re-Conclusory allegation not ugical monitortny babed on Enercise events or occurrences. O f *t a B FEMA COMMENTS CITED .I I' a u o, o t { g y R.ERO 114 ARCA-5: Unsecured door Irrelevant to training conten-LERO procedure modified. AltCA This a tre escape on east side tion. Facts do not implicate New procedura calling for entry utiding a training flew. PSA Guard Post I to ensure

eleved, security for-fire escape be pq dcor is stressed at LERO deat ni h

Staging Area Managenient untet j Tabletop Drill III (Rev. ge,ges May, 1986) 1 2RCA-10: Residences of irrelevant to training conten-LERO is evaluating maps for persons were difficult tion. FEMA recommended Driv-clarity and if warranted 3 rivers to find era be provided more detailed will include utility pole maps and descriptions of pick numbers for markers of pick up points. up points, w"<e

M & L.1tLD TIG'E. RAC IGNIIM & IIiO VERBATD1 RAC Analysts ( [RAC IdVIIM KOIFICATIO4S & REVS 7 & 8 K DIFICATIQ S ( t g- .3-ce Ei! .il.i. 351 e -g n VINI FEMA Evaluat ion of LERO Response I[ .k h y 8 ( will 9/l/86 Adequately address the en-gygge, co.,gg g g, ,,,g a g p to arcise issue. training to be provided to d sd to Reception Center ernitoring 0 !*'I"8 personnel le adequate. The capsbtlity to monitor indi-viduate within approstaately ninety (90) seconde needs to be evaluated at a future esercles. i I i ~_ d .3-

ce x.

1 .Ei.! ill 3,. 5.5 e FLMA Evalust inn of.LERO Seepunse I[ k IIN I Bding 9/l/66 Adequately address the en-Procedures for security and A 1 re-ercise issue. emergency utilization of the will Lit.CO Petchogue District Of fice the as the LERO Pat c hogue Staging allon Area have been modified in OPir Lity 4.7.1 to adequately adJreae C. thle esercise teaue. The effectiveness of t he se plan modification should be evalu-sted at a future esercise. TI )ERTURE Adequately address tne ra-t CARD Availabb On anm eani 8709 010 3 30 -7 5~ 1 t .- ~

ww' u CONTENTION E LERO F AILED TO Thal ( EFFECTIVELY INFORM THE PU8 DATA ANAIR OR!)NTICN CI'!TD AND KY)lFICAT!WS IN !EIO E 00RRESP0lOING fMA CIMENT STMUS AS SUPPORP FOR EX 50.p PRUNNES 6 TRAINING AS STA EA 37; Pe u t wi. t i v e action R e c o::unendgi on s (Not sepe-rctoly admitted but incor-prrated into subpart i of EM l5) As Failur e to watend PARS irrelevant to

t. raining contsn-b3 yond to mile EPZ tions.

Factually baseless. LERO followed applicable pro-cedures. FEMA Report at 33. Os Hu PAHa for other than M. Cairy entmals C: No PARb concerning M. w3ter and food D Failure to complete inconsequential. ActLal data l Crcund duposition worksheet were available so completion of an estimatton worksheet was unnecessary. EM 3ti s Public Informetton As ENC doldyed in openings Factually baseless. ENC n2 information until first activation was timely. Sy n:ss conference et 0810 FEMA Report at 52. LILCO is-sued press retwases at 0625 and 0639. T aa.n t:: d ll:~q 7g "C i &5 8: First news release de-Factually baseless trrelevant E s t,an t ia l emergency infor-p l laygd and inaccurate to training. Information was mation summarized and 1 (ENC-D-la insufficient timely provided. Equipment transmitted via computer ccpying capabilities re-problem, not training, caused from the EOC to ENC and all culted in deleys in distri-delays in distributing updated rumor control locations si-bution of inf or mat ion) Information, New procedures multaneously. Additional and better copying capability enovnno equipment (total of thould obviate problem. $ ma t.. ^ *== = ) ensures, suffl-cient capab.'ity 4n event of ununtncipate. *achine fallure. ..a= w

/ 1 h50HNEL10 [HROUGH THE MfDIA t L l > NAr IN MVI!W T LIIM > c: 'TUIPICATlWS, pg myrm y u3o VERBATIM RAC ANALYSIS $wrIM IN PAC RVilM KOIFIC m O45 T RLYS 7 & 8 MJOII'1 CAT 106 .$ e C 5~ tS* E.3 d.: 13; E:* gaa

a!
zt st

s

.ea Response ( ACTION) , FEMA Evoluesion el 1.ERO Reeponse I[ $$E ..a leg enchinee in O's/86 Reser ved dec 16 t ori (Jabed on The plan hea been modified to 1 1 ENC are being fact that LERO had not yet create en additional position, need for upgreJe decided to upgrade copying LEko Spokesperson, and adds-repiecement se capabilities, stonal etsff have been assigned )sery. to esaure better coordinetten of information in the t'NC. The >rder to eeredite 6/d9/86 IIRO spoke s pe r son to respons-einstlun of in-ible for coordinating the re. )tica, procedures lease of information working in tecen revloed. conjunction with the County [f St len emer&ency Exec ut ive or his designes, if cotton will be he chooses to participate. The APERTURE mo e, ekes,orson ni re,re-in o _.e., for. alsultaneousiy sent liko et prese conferences. CARD citted wie cm-rreos reiesses are to 6e die-to the ENC and t albuted to utilit y, government rueur control and media personnel et the ENC.

fons.

Also Availal>le OI3 ' de Provided in Ort? 3.f.t. fee. g erlitre Card 3.2.4, changes in important p e ergency informad on will be electronicotty trenesitted to Rumor Control District offices and cell et 'te TSO print-out (alou see Ortr 3.8.1, Sec.

5. 3.4 ).

DATA GJnn#HN Cin2) Ato K0IFICATICIS IN IDO 00fuciua>ING IViA CrMON STA%tS AS SUPIORT FOR EX 50.F PRX121.5ES & TRAINING AS i Cs Secono newb release de- ~Id. Id. layed (ENC-D-la insufft-cient copying capabilities I resulled in delays in dis-tributlun ut information) Da Isabuf t lo tesit

c. up y i ng irrelevant to training.

M. capability at ENC delayed Equipment problem caused de-distribution of information lays in distributing updated (ENC-D-l; Insufficient information. New procedures copying capabilities re-and better copying capability suited in deleys in distri-should obviate problem. button of information) 2.

  1. 5 _6 t;%

'; a g u u so E'3 E. Insufttctent/ inadequate Irr e levant to training. Facts The suggested displays and ACA mmph and displays baseJ on equipment deficiency. status boards have been (ENC-ARCA-2: Insufficient provided to the ENC. maps and displays) 2. ~ 5 _3 UU B * ~Q '; a g "t Et# fa E ts5 me b bdue contained Minor and corrected by revi-Press Release procedures ? AltCA mattaneous inf or eha t t on slons in LERO procedures and have been modified. EB5 s (ENC-ARCA 3: EDS mesbaues follomup training. messages allt no longer be contained wateenwuub infor-relembed. The Coordinator motion) of Pubitc Information pre-pares press releases using an established format. The Director of Local Response approves it. The LERO Spokesperson directs dis-tributlon to t he n.ed a e; LERO Public Informettu.e Group Personnel receive training in the new proce-dures in the LERO Pubtic Information Tabletop Drill (Rev. Now. 1986). v < e*"

II) DY HNi IN 1HVIW & LIIII) 7 6 d *t01FICATIO45, NN' HLvim T IER) MRIMTIN FX #ALysis % VDetATIM IN RAC I4VIlld K LIFICATIG E & RINS 7 6 8 KUIFICATIQ4S l LILCo le ottil evaluating the l ' lack of hard copy capability for dis t r i but ton of Ess messages to the press in the ENC. Uniti LILCO completes the evaluation of thle equipment for providing hard copies of ERS messages to the media, the response to this esercise leave is rated inadequate. w... 1Y-1 13 - -o a '00 c w o. 4 e e. i se - o: gg1 5%E 11 5"" ."PR 20 Neopunse ( ACTION) Ft.nA Evalues ion el LE80 Beepunse EE O: u i suggested addt-9/l/86 Adequatuly address the on-The suggested displays and A I anal displays and etcthe issue, status boards are t o be pos t ed ): ue boards util be la the briefing roce. No plan o svided to the iMC. revisions are necessary to address thle esercise teaue. e The use and effectiveness of h the additionel EpZ map to track PARS and plume path and the use APERTURE .nd effectivene.e on t6e ECt Status Board should be evolu-(dNO ated at a future esercies. _a s Also Available On .5- ': C U ~* Aperture Card gra 2:a 1:* it 2:3 4%E @ Respunne (ACTION) FEMA Evaluation el.LE20 Besponse IE h emergency press 9/l/86 The plan modtficutlons ace- .The plan has bee n modified, A 1 Gases, which do act queteIy addre6a the eaer-OrIP 3.8.1, Sec. S.4.4, to gain deleted mate-clse issue, reguire the LERO Spokesperson B, util be posted l to have e staff member dio-Ghe ENC. t ribute hard copies of correct l press releases (ESS meses6se) which have been received via the TSO systee. Th*

'an modification ade-gu....f address the esercise issue.

Training of p10 etsff et the ENC should be evaluated 09010330 77 that e s t rane ous information free EDS message draf ts le not inadvertently given to etw 'w

I.ATA ANAI.YZi URTINTICN Cf'nD AfD KO!!'ICATICNS IN U30 N 02RHESIUOllC FDiA (IMitNP STAnJS AS SUI'IORT }DR I:X 50.F l'NOC12XJNES & TRAINING ASSTAny G2 Prehm s ee 80.mm buplicative of Contention (see ex 38.8 staove) idte/incu utdie (ENC-D-1: EX 38.C. Irrelevant to Inhuf f icissit tupying coud-timining. Information won bilitteb s ubui ted in delays timely provided. Equipment in distribution ut i n f o r ma - pr oblem ceubed de lays tsi tion) distributing updated informm-tton. New procedurch and bet-ter copying capability should E obviate problem. Hs Evacustlun decision y. (see Ex 38.8 above) l given to media too late i (ENC-D-l: Insufficient copying capdbilfties re-suited in delays in distri-bution of information) la Media requested not to factually baseless. In accor-g inform public of LERO dance with LERO procedures g workers' ingestion of K1 media were never briefed about LERO workers' MI ingestton. Ja ENC pasbonnel unable to Factually b.a s e l e s s. Facts do provide information to not demonstrated a failure to medim; unable to contact provide the media information. Marketing Evaluations Ks Not admitted. La ENC log falsely indi-E sercise event s do not impit-cated gravel truck impedt-cate deficiency in training. ment was being removed The inaccurate information was not released to the public or the media. Ms ENC perbonnel could not Factually baseless. LERO answer questions about im-spokesperson reported essen-pediment tie l details including loca-tion of road blockage and rerouting of traffic. Na ENC mths.teted facts Insignificant, isolated errors about (1) when Emergency during a whole day'b worth of was declos ed (b823, correct public information do not es-time man 0619), (2) EPZ tablish a training problem. winter vm. nummer popula-tion 0: Delayed delivery of Onsite function; trrelevant to (see Ex 38.8 above) press reledues 4 and 5 to training. Medt.a Monitoring Medle blon t t or ing (ENC-D-1: receives information through Insuftictent copying caci-EBS messages, does not nave bilit ies r esul ted in 6 ays immediate need for news re-in distributlun ut informe-leases. Equipment problem tion) caused deleys in distributing updated information. New pro-cedures and better copying co-pability should obviate prob-lem. ps Rumor Control operation Duplicative of Contention toutfecttwo ob described in EX 39. Contentlun t.X 39 Q: LEHO modtttcutluns Irrelevant to training. would be inddequate to rem-Conclusory allegation not soy "deftctencies" based on Enercise evants. Ex 40,0i EDS messaje Irrelevant to training issue. falsely told putite 7 effic Contention Ex 40.C presents no fau l d e s would be in pl :e factual support on issue of ~ esercise of independent judo-ment by LERO personnel. ,,.e % s

HAl' IN EV11M T 1.IIID d 40!PICATIOE. pg m yt m y tr,o WWMTIM RAC ANA1.YSIS yATIM IN HAC RLVIW KDITICAT10s T REVS ' & 8 i(DITICATICNS I (hwu EM 38.8) (see EX 38.D) (bee Ex 38.8) TI APERTURE CARD Aleo Available 0,4 "A erture Card P 8700 0108 30 _7 f

b '%g M ENTIO LERO HAS FAILED T IN DOSIMETRY, EXPOSUR GNNNTICN CITED AND WIFICATIOS IN 1170 CDRRC5100DG 11NA GPf0ff STATUS AS SUPPORT FOR EX 50.H PTO @ DUHES & TRAltO C AS OI W:: E.2 t go@ uo EX 27: School Bus Drivers j lack training in gg (1) dostmetry Facts do not implicate deft-f40 changes in LERO training ARCA (EOC-ARCA-ll: 00simetry ciency in the training of-program required. LERO is and training have not been fered. currently developing a provided to bchool evacua-mechanism to facilitate tion Dus Drtvers) participation of non-LERO school Bus Drivers in LERO training program. ~ 0E^ .2 t .2 3 $ = 8I(u (2) K1 procedures 19 19-ARCA (EOC-ARLA '3: $chool evac-uation Bus Drivers have not t> e e n trained in use of KI) 3.

  • 2,.f UCQ

':: a g E5 (3) encebs enpost.re autho-Id. Id. nCA risation (LOC-ARCA 15: School evrcuatton fJus Drtv-ers have not been trained regarding o n c e b e, oose au-thorizattun)

/ ,50,H IN PERSONNEL ( DiHOL, AND K! USL I i JT) DY HAl' IN RfV11M T LIILD 5 7 6 t! M VITICATIOE, HAP REVIDd & !.230 VI:RDATIM RAC ANALYSIS @ VE3d ATIM IN RAC IGVIIM K VIFICATIO G CF RLYS 7 & 8 HDIFICATIO4S / n a - .5-OGO e 'e o y uw "t. g:: 1*:

2. ;. ?
0. ~: 3 oao 25 j y!

. O.%. 00 Response ( ACTION) l FEMA Ewelust ion of.Lf.XO Response 4s u LCO le ready to N/A Reserved decision pending LitI0's commitment to provide I 1 3de by its commit. development of mechanism to t r ela t ag and Equipment for facilitate training of esposure control to school bus et to provide trata. 3 in basic pria-non-LERO personnel, drivers le understood. leow-pies of redtetion ever it is not evident in the e 3 dealestry use and plan how these non-LERO workere provide personal are to be teformed that they ]Imetere and 51 need to lettlete the requeet. biete to all school s delvere opea Quest. .. = =. QO .S a C .g guw "t. 2.3 4.5 12o E45 o -e- .. - m e il 2""

  • y5 30 Resp mee (ACTION) l FIJth Evolust ion of IIRO Response I3 k 0.%

u i LE20 ECC lese Ii. N/A y. Lil40's comettaent to pravide 1 I tratalag and equipment for es-gA posure control to school bue dstvere to understeed. How-ever, it le not evasent in the plea bow these non-1280 workere are to be teformed that tMy need to tattlete the requeet. 2.' 's c =n w "w u w .o

  • w
  • 3

^;A 21 ?. %%3 --a .e (y{ mo ae o D Response (ACTION) FEMA Ewelu1L ion of.LERO Re sponse 4! u LEko EOC S t em 11. N/A ~Id. LILCO's commitment to provide i I training and equipment for es-posure control to school bus drivers la understood. How-ever, it le not evideet in the plan how these non-8280 workere .AP3TGR, ere to 6e : for ed t*st ther need to i.itiate ll.e r. est. (', Mt D 8709 010 3 30 -7 y Alm AuMe o,, A erture Curd D

DATA ANA QJmWl'!W CITtD NO KUIFICATICNS IN IJJO f CORREEPCDOING EDIA CD90fr STAniS AS SUPPORT IVR EX S0.H P)OPR]UIES & TRAINING As g;j i n.g n -5 M $ E "5 1 ' 333 u i EE4A 1 j ARCA EX'2Br Ambulette_ Drivers Facts do not implicate a duft-LERO training for Ambu-j were not all trained in en-ciency in the training of-lance /Ambulette Drivers is I cessive esposure authoriza* fored. Problem noted web conducted monthly now to tion and procedureb caused by high attrition among ensure that new drivers are (EOC-ARCA-14: Anbulette Ambulance /Ambulette Drivers trained quickly. LERO Drivers were not all who had been trained. Re-Classroom Training Program trained regarding eacess placements liad not yet re-materials have been revised dose authorization) celved training at time of the. to emphasize radiological Esercise. Procedures have procedures including oncess been revised to rectify prou-esposure authorization pro-

lem, cedures Ex 42 (Banes incorporated in Ex 38 & Ex 39)

As unt in e ly / lnbf f ect ive Irrelevant to training of per-response to road impedi-sonnel in radiological proca-ments (EOC-D*ls Delays in

dures, responding ettectively to s'oad imp ed i enen t s )

Bt untimely / inadequate re-M. sponse to Ridge School evacuatton message (PSA-ARCA-II: Forty minute delay in d6spatching Bus Ortver to evacuate school citi Idi en) C Inabl86ty to handle un-M. unpected r umor s Da InubtIity of Traffic g. Guides to suspond to evacuse questioning or know encess cose authorization procedure (PSA-ARCA-7 Traffic Guides lacked com-plate information) ~ 9uu. I EUl.3 sc:: .S t i.Maji 1 w u I E$$ (PSA-ARCA los Tratfic Facts do not demonstrate a Traffic Guides wear LERO ARCA Guides did not understand pervasiva flaw in LERO Identification Badges eacess duke authorization training pregram. Minor, lau-enumerating radiological procedures) lated incidents readily cor-procedures on the back for rectable by revisions in LERO quick reference in the equipment and training. field. The Badge clearly states that they will re-ceive authorization for en-Cess exposure from the Lead Traffic Guide. Excess dose authorization procedures are now emphasized in re-vised LERO Classroom Training materials for Session 3, " Personnel Dostmetry and Esposure Con-trol" (Rev. July, 1986), ww

OY W' IN IO/IW OF LILLD ' & tl MIPICATIOS, IVf IGNIW & Lao W:REMTIM PAC ANALYSIS %iATIM IN PAC l@NIW 60DITICATIO6 & RENS 7 6 8 Elf 1CATIO4S r I QU .30 "U* -.3 c

.s
3 3Il.

. a..l 2%$ g us FEMA Evaluation vi LEko Respunse I$ u: stespunse ( ACTioet) There are no plan modification.a A 1 Adequately address the en-hEO EOC item 82. N/& ercise lasue. necessary to address thle eser-caos leave. The L1LCO response indicetes that the training program has been modified to place additional emphaele of emergency worket protectivo actions and that traintag of ambulance /ambetette drivers has been scheduled. _ C' 8 .5" 000 e 1.3 .3 %~=

3 1"

SEE I*I it "4 je5 FDtA Evaluat ion of LCR0 Response 4m .0X u Desponse ( ACTite) _,a Pa t c hogue Staging M/A Adequately address the ya-LEROe toeponse is adequate. A 1 arcise issue. Stace the issue relates to g g,, g), training of emergency workere regarding esposure

control, LEkO's commi t me n t to emphaelse 705 11 thle as pe c t in its training to res,onei.e.

n,e enfeu.en.se APD.M @. g' at 'rao's e oriener orker radiological espcsure control (,3 e d y b retning should be evaluated at g t a future esercise. Also Avaitalile On Apertnre Cned 8709 0 t o s so - Fo

l DATA ANA).Y8 'ICATIONS IN IEJt) IG l c2famim crTm AND cxuTSKro1NG lutA QM42ft STAnJS AS SUPPOIC NR DC 50.H PKXEURES & 'IHAINING AS STAS l l E S ues.e Dum Drivert felled Irrelevant to training of per-to carry out their assigned sonnel in radiological proce-dutlem (PSA-D-b Dub Driv *

dures, era deldyed, went tu wrong t r ansf er pu lut, ur mlbhed segment ut dbstunud route)

F: Irmit to Gulden arrived ~Id. late at cuntiul point 6 (RSA-D-2: Traffic Guide deleyed in asetving at con-trol potuth) @us Driveta not dispatched M. In timely fashlon ( PSA - ARC A-- I : Bus Drtverb not dispatched until 2 hours after emergency dec-laratton) G: ENC put hunne l falled to IQ. respond appropriately to media questtons l EX 45: (annended to end of Cx 50) A Communications failures Irrelevant to training of per-in response to traffic im-sunnel in radioicgical proce-1 pedtmsnt mobbmuss (TOC-D-l: dures. Delays in responding to two l l ovacuattun impediments; l EOC-ARCA-9: Delay in field l varifIcatlun of fuel truck j Impoulment) l l Os Communications failures Id, i in response to school evaucatiun message (P5A-ARCA-ll: Forty minute delay in dimpatch of Dus Driver tu evecuate school l ctilldren) C f allur u to notify FAA & M. LIHR ( E OC - AH(' A-2 : Confu-siosi r eud e d ieig the trie t h ud of nutifying FAA 1 l EOC-ARCA-Ji LikH was not M. 3, notifled) ~>3 l UUN 0g C"O &54 Ds failure to distinguish Irrelevant to training conten-Dose Assessment statu" ARCA between DOE RAP and LILCO tion. Facts involve equipment board has been revised to fteId monituring on dose deftcluncy. separate data from DOE RAP assessment statuk board and LILCO field monitoring (EOC-ARCA-4: Not etiough teams. A me e t i rig was held columns un dube .a s h e b b me n t with DOE resprentatives on statum tsuar d to keep DOE Jan. 6, 1987 to rwvien use RAP and LinCO data sepa-of new status board, rated) l l . =,

' D! RLVitN & !.11LD MUD'ICATIO45, RAC RfVIDd & IBO VL'RBATIM RAC ANALYSIS flM Di RAC IEVID4 KVITICATIOE T FEN 5 7 & 8 KDIFICATIQG l I o Q 'j .: O puw c e. x:: 2%3 al

&t A1
  • 31 ea g05 3,,,,,,, ( gggg g )

iTMA Evaluat ion of LERO Response 48 u dose assessment 9/4/86 Adequately address ttie en-LERO's modification of the does I ercise issue. seassement status board to will be modified accommodate data from bot h x,og, g, a.g. ME/W teams and Li p teams both 00E-RAF is adequate. Tratains of the and Lit.CO teams, LERO does aseosoment stell to T[ make effective use of the modified.t.t e us,d.ho.id se APERTURE .e o i.. e d.. f.t-e. -a s.. CATID "ll$"f$ $" 8700 0103 30 p/ ,e --..-.ii i

b b DATA ANAL,Y 03 m NrlOJ CITED AND piFICATI(24S IN IJM QXUUT>PONDDG IUiA Gyt1DC STARS AS SLMOPT FOR 1:X 50.H PRXIDURES & 7 PAINING AS 2.m .E 6 Un% ';; a g .u w = M- -(,{ e. Downwind distance of isolated instance of human All downwind distances no" ARCA Al dose measurement errone-error caused by a decimal reported directly in miles tr ously repotted as 7000 me-point misplaced during conver-without need to convert to de ters instemd of 700 meters, alon of distance units. Po-meters. Reviewed during g (EOC-AHCA-5: Ouwnwind dis-tantial for error obviated by L.ILCO/OOE meeting cin E' tance of m tteyroid dose change in procedures. Jan. 6, 1987. 'I sample incurrect4y reported "I as 7000 metess instead of 700 meters) 0:: {( 1: g "t 2# Entropolated doses Minor and correctable by revi-Procedure r'on calls for ARCA LE erroneously reported as ac-slons in LERO procedures and identification of data upon t,e tual doses on status board, training. recalpt at EOC as actual or ed (FOC-ARCA-62 Eatropolated extrapolated. DOE RAP per-co dose data were reported as sonnel notified of change .c actual measurements on sta-in reporting procedure at da tus boerd) LILCO/ DOE meeting on Jan. 6, 1987. Es Secretary did not de-Irrelevant to training of per-liver telephone message sonnel in radiological proce-promptly to LERO Director dures. F Communications failures ~Id. of LNC, Public Information. and Rumor Controi personneI G: Fellus e of HSA person-y. nel to properly record event informatlun on status taca r d. (RSA-ARCA-1: Time was not always included when new information was posted on hiatus thoard) Puur radiu receptlon y. at Port Jetterson Staging Arca.

  • s

s EW IN RENIW W L.ILLD 8 '40lFICAT1GE, py pyygg,g a m W2WATIM RAC ANN YSIS

  • WTIM IN IMC HLVIW K DIFICATIO E CF REVS 7 6 8 MDIFICATIO4S I
  • e. AH

.i US~ O f.. g3: 1*j 2:a 13 Ei a ' *. 317 eo y$g so ispunes ( ACTION) FEMA Evaluat ion el LESO Re sponse 4s u m a . material for 9/l/86 Acequately address the on-proceJure Opip 3.S.2, Section A g leetun of field arcise issue. 3.5 has t>een revloed to spe_tfy 1888 be re v iewed that all distances reportee by pre 4.ERO sud nog DOE-rap tease are to N recorded la alles.

oe are con-To be in-In Rev. 4.

The plan modifications ode-quately address the esercise teaua. Impleme et ssion of this change should be evaluated at a future esercise. Q" O *~ C .8 OS"

  • O.

g3: E3 . Y.

  • oao 55

"[ E 5 0.%. _. repuner (ACTION) FEMA Evaluation of LERO teopense 4,v, .m socedures will 9/l/84 Adequately address the en. T.w plan has been endtfied. A 1 owed and a note orcise issue. Ot'IP 3.S.2, Section 3.6, to re-e ensure better quire that when field dets is ottoa and received, the data to identi-a use of field fled es se actual measuressat To be incor-i or se extrapolated data. All in rev. 8. entsapolated data are now to be posted under " projected data" on tle status board. lThe plan modi!8catione ade-quately Moraes the esercise

tasse, laptementation of this change should be ver!!!ad at a future esercise.

TI APERTURE CARD Also Archble On Aperture Card 6799 01 os so - g >

b he IATA ANAL GJminKN CinD AND KI)1f'ICATIO6 IN U30 F CORHESKPDING IDIA CLet1DR STARS AS SUPPORr fut 12 50.H P;rmMNES & THAINUG As s'-g = 0 I ^h O'S l 5$$ t "53 u E t$ u m D i mpe t ther at Dispetcher's last minute re-LERO Staging Area Monage-ARCA PSA mode inata ura t e en-minders to Dus Ortvers were ment Tabletop Drill III l nount enevn t t, to bus Dr ives a not complete. but contained nu (Rev. May, 1966) now about dos tene t ry inaccuracies of important in-empnasizes need for com-(PSA-ARCA-12; Dus Dis-formation. Minor, isolated plate, precise instructions patcher diti nut give instance not indicative of a at all times. dosimetry units nor mention pervasive training flaw. 0-200 mkEM DRD, tiu b Driver misdi-Irrelevant to training of per-rected at the BHL transfer sonnel in radiological proce-point. (PSA-ARCA-93 In-

dures, structions to proceed to Receptlun Center were not properly tranemttted at BNL transfer pulut Ha loability to t ratismi t M.

correct lief urma t ion about Suttolk County Police De-partment abbistance = 0I^ C'5. h JTHER FEMA LOFMENTS CITED ..t, 20S ~ u E5$ LOL-ARCA-12; Sonie facts do not implicate a deft-LERO training for Ambu-ARCA Ambulette Detvers were not tiency in the training of-lance /Ambulette Drivers is aware of when to take their fered. Problem noted was conducted monthly now to kl caused by high ettrition among ensure that new drivers are Ambulance /Ambulette Drivers trained quickly. LERO who had been trained. Re-Classroom Training Program placements had not yet re-materials have been revised ceived training at the time of to emphablas radiological the Esercise. procedures including use of KI. s' w

IN M VTfW & LIIID pirICAT104S, FW IOVUM & II30 VERBATIM PAC ANALYSIS b3 IN RAC HLV11M KOITICATIO4S & leas 7 b H KUIFICATIO4S l ~~: w l c Q*d SC 08~ l 53 S*: t'a 2? 0* ti pa ( ACTlued ) rEMA Evalust ion of.LD0 Beepense II .k h u pel going 9/l/86 Adequately dddrums thw wa-g.lLCO's coeniteent that train-A I aid receive arcise issue. Ing of lead Traf fi<. Jutdee and y briefing Bus Dispatchers will emphaelse ore leeued the need for giving precise stry. The esposure control briefings to Bc Culdes' field workere le adeguate. The $epeschers' i effectiveness of shts training }t be modl-should be evelnated at a future phae l s e t he esercles. more pre-Ce their c_. Q 'j .3 C I3 2.* P' U " s c ow at 2%a

a!
  • 3%

1 }{I u ee tu Tion rEn Euluat ion i,s.Luo seapon.e <c u ambulance / 9/1/86 Adequately addruss exercisu There are no plan modtitcatione A I drivers la

issue, necessary to address this eser-aduled and clos tenue. The LILCO response cavised to indicates that the treintag creased es-progree has been modified to doetsetry place addittanal aaphaste on rgical pro-emergency worker protective stione for actions and that training of srkere.

ambulance /aebelette drivere has u.. ec, dul.d. TI APERTURE C AllD Also Available On Aperture Car <i 8709 0103 30 - f 3 = - -. _ _..........}}