ML20238B387
| ML20238B387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1987 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-5-A-016GG, OL-5-A-16GG, NUDOCS 8709010198 | |
| Download: ML20238B387 (21) | |
Text
_
i' LELCDb<Ed%:t(Q 30 - 3 2 Of -5
- g.,
$l/flf]
'87 AUS 21 TJO :02
. av RADIOLOGICAL EERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS EERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (E0C) MODULE EVACUATION OPERATIONS OBSERVER DATA Facility:
IM Date:
/ 7/e/ fit $
r i
Specific Assignment:
%FFsc CoaTitoLLE#
Team Leader:
Name:
hoc 47E S Organization:
i Tit 1ei EP Ea0:4EtL Business Address:
Business Phone:
8709010198 870518 PDR ADOCK 050 2
0
(
wun emum ammissa
$ D-32 z 0 6 -5 Aid (A k IbC4 i.
.<bA,th.A tatwn%,
de,i i coew se.
l icanna sue
-- ntermo_
wc= _
gurgiro,
lawuner __
r tt*g Offr 5-i M 7 e
mg mm
=
"~
~ ~ "'
gepage, _
LAyy
- TMp, i
f f
I t
i t
pSTRUCTIONS, Introduction
)
This fom is intended as a tool 'for the observer to use in observing and evaluating an exen:isey There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should have the "EOC Module",,an obse'ever assigned to. the Emergency News Center $%uld have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on. The module you ha've should correspond to your assignment.
i
\\
1 l
You should bring the fonn along w1th you when you go to observe. The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to look for.
l You may wish to fill out some or all of the questions while en location, s
NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is h
I rated under another part of the response organization.
4
+
Directly below is a short explanation of what is in the form and how to fill it cut; please read this explanation as soon as possible.
Concept of Form and. instructions for Use (1) Structure and Format.
Each module is coracosed of several
( - sections. Eacn section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example,: " equipment,"
t
" communications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two parts. The first part is a series of questions for you to rate the perfonnance. The second part is a sununary section, with space to write a narrative essay sumarizing your overall
(
impressions.
1
)
(2) Rating Questions. You have four options when answering these questions: Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, #A, and N/0.
o
" Satisfactory" means that personnel ard equipment perfonned at an acceptable level.
Errors noted were not severe and the task was completed in an. acceptable manner. For.
example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks 1
/
his dosineter only 7 of the 8 times he seuld in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, his performance is satisfactory. However, your narrative summry should explain the rating.
o "Un satisf actorja" means that personnel and equipment generally performed below an acceptable level.
There were deficiencies of a significant nature. The area's.. ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.
\\
h
^
[
c
~
~
d 484 4 _. g.
'l i s
'is.
I
.. s r a
o "N/A" stands for "not applicable." For example, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced or ch:ckad?
should be "not applicable".
In some cases, a whole section may be not applicable.
For example, if you will be observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your EOC module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media relations are concucted at another facility.
o "N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whet.her the activity was done properly.
If something should have been done (or should have been there) tut wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory".
(3)
Short answer questions.
These are generally self-explanatory.
Host are informational, asking you to list the participants at your location, or to describe a certain procedure esserved, e tc.
Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived. Be alert for these events.
(4) Summatt. On the summary page, you should write a brief ecsay (one paragraph to one page) to describs and evaluate the activities and resources covered by that section.
Descrice the resources available and what occurred, in your own words.
You should cover the main points raised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations.you consider relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or " Unsatisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are encouraged.
Miscellaneous Notes (1) The front cover of t'he critique form has blank lines for you to write your name, assignment, etc.
(2)
Please do not use blue ink - it does not photo-copy.
Pletse note: The observations and judgements recorded on this form will be the basis for future reports and decisions. Be thorough and clear; this will avoid tne necessity of contacting you later for clarification.
1
EERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE l
I.
Emergency Operations Management Sat Ur. sat N/A N/0 1.
Was an individual effecitvely in
/
charge?
(2(ryse 2.
If so name this individual, c>,,u_croc of t=<At 3.
Was the person in charge the person so designated in the plan?
4.
Were periodic briefings held, to update staff on the situation?
/
5.
Were staff (as appropriate) involved
/
in decisionmaking?
6.
Was a copy of the plan available 7
for reference?
7.
Did staff have written procedures 7
or checklists for reference?
l
/
8.
Were message logs kept?
9.
Were messages reproduced and dis-tributed, if appropriate?
10.
If so, was message handling
/
effictent?
- 11. Was access to the EOC contro11ed's N/A
- 12. When was the EOC notified on the following events (as applicable)?
- P1 ant at " Alert" status N/A
- Plant at " Site Area Emergency" status N/A
- Plant at " General Emergincy" status N/A
- 13. When were the following protective action orders issued (or received)?
- Take shelter N/A
- Evacuate N/A Sat Unsat N/A N/0 14.
If appropriate, were actions taken to coordinate emergency activiites, scch as (indicate time, or write 'No,'
"N/A," or "N/0"):
- Call placed to activate radiological menitoring teams?
N/A
- Call placed to activate relocation center?
N/A
- 15. Was Federal assistance requested?
N/A 16.
If so, indicate who requested it and what they asked for:
j i
1 i
Sunmary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
goe pa eurerary Jo sr.erse in sma Grau f
a rt., re W"3 JM E.!fa r et nssirie arm) an &
a AAL A
xyrra < wwraw,
.rr
~a.rr-as e y~so n r*<*r mL assmts 4.n2 M =
2r.
Tw.o., tew musq g.w z,,m.,
up/w t
dC gi.:c45 of Ct.sss*7 psL Fq, 4
i.
--. -.-_- _ j
II.
Public Alerting and Instruction A.
Public Alerting
]
Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Did this ECC play a role in public y
alerting 2.
If so, please complete parts (a) through (c):
(a)
Indicate what started the process of public alerting, and when this "ini-t1ating event" occurrec.
If alerting was played more than once, record the time of the initiating event for each round of alerting.
Initiating Event Time (s)
Call from licensee a/o
~
Call tram an EOC (specify)
N/A Other (specify) ab (b)
Indicate how the public was alerted; what action was taken at his EOC to alert the public. Indicate when the action was taken.
If vehicles were dispatched, indicate how long it took to complete their routes.
? gain, i n-i l
dicate the times for each round of I
alerting played.
Action Taken Time (s) l Sirens activated N/A l
Tone alert radios activated
-~
N/A EBS activated N/A 7 Vehicles dispatched (if s/a so indicate route time)
/ Calls put to schools, fac-tories or other institutions 4/8 (specify) l personnel at another EOC instructed to do one of the i
above (specify)
Other (specify) l i
i ;
i
Sat Unsat N/A N/0 (c) Describe the process in between the
" initiating event" and the " action taken." Did the staff simply follow instructions, or was there discussion or consultation?
B.
Public Instruction Drafting of instructions:
1.
Were emergency public instructions drafted in this E0C7 N/A 2.
Were they generally clear and appropriate to the situation?
N/A l
3.
Were prescripted messages used?
N/A 4.
Were protective action areas described in terms of familiar boundaries and l andmarks?
N/A 5.
If an instruction to take shelter was formulated:
- Did it include guidance on shelter-ing methods (e.g., close windows, I
put cloth over mouth when outside, etc.)?
N/A
- Did it include instructions for transients without sheltu. (e.g.,
campers) ?
N/A 6
If an instruction to evacuate was fomulated, did it include irifor-mation/ instructions on the evacua-tion of school children?
N/A i
T Sat Un sat N/A N/0 Distribution of instructions:
7.
Did this EOC play a role in distri-buting instructions to the publict 8.
Indicate which of the following systems was useo to distribute instructions, and at what time the message went out.
If public instruction was played more i
than once, indicate the time messages went out for each round.
Message Distribution System Ti me( s_)
EBS N/A l
Tore alert radios N/A
-~
Vehicles with PA systems a/.
l
.' Calls to schools, factories, or other insti'tutions (specify)
L)/.
Personnel at another location
~
instructed to do one of the above (specify) l l
Other (specify) 9.
Was the timing of public instruction coordinated with the public alerting process, so that public alerting (e.g., sirens) was followed immedi-ately by an f astructional message?
N/A
- 10. Were instructional messages period-ically repeated?
w-l Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonaances.
_g.
III. Protective Action A.
Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was activation of traffic control points promptly ordered?
v
2.
Were estimates of expected traffic
/
volume discussed?
3.
According to EOC staff, are appro-priate resources available to keep I
evacuation routes clear:
- During bad weather?
- In event of stalled or wrecked cars?
/
4.
Were these resources activated for the exercise?
/
5.
Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the contaminated area:
- All roads blocked?
- VF traffic rerouted?
/
- Water traffic stopped?
- Rail traffic stopped?
6.
According to EOC staff, are local l
i resources adeqdate to cover all l
traffic and access control functions simultaneously:
- In terms of available personnel?
s-
'~~
1
- In terms of available vehicles?
l
' - - ~ ~ ~ ~
- If not, was help promptly requested?
1 7.
Were relocation centers ordered to be activated in a timely fashion:
N/A l
4 B.
Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was evacuation of onsite individuals demonstrated?
N/A 2.
If so was it:
- Promptly activated?
N/A
- Well organized?
T/X~
3.
Were the EOC staff aware of the location of mobility-impaired indi-viduals in the ares (whether insti-tutionalized or at homeM
/
4.
Was this infomation in written form?
/
5.
Were they aware of the particular special needs of mobility-impairs) residents?
6.
Was thf, infomation in written fom?
7.
Were arrangements made for transpor-tation of mobility-impaired persons?
i 8.
If school children are to be evacu-ated by bus:
- According to participants, are enough buses and drivers available to cover the schools in the plume EPZ?
N/A
- How are drivers contacted?
W
- Was contact of drivers demonstrated?
N/A
- Was an EBS menage prepared to infom parents as to where children were being taken?
N/A 9.
(Whether or not schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic jams (of parents) at the schools?
N/A I
I 1
1 (
L----------------------
T e
C.
Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Protective Actions Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was current infomation available on the location of:
- Daity fams?
N/A j
- Food processing plants?
T K-
- Water supply intake points?
N/A 2.
Were there detailed maps available showing crop information?
N/A 3.
What recommendations were made re-garding ingestion pathway protective actions, and what were they based on?
I 4.
According to EOC staff, is there a body of trained staff to work individually with f anners, food-workers,.ater utilities, and so on to implement protective actions?
N/A i
i ______ ______ _ _ __
i i
Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the f acts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
B aaru F.ne. I asaser. OE EC AM
- l
'*r 3 3e. 7"E fF t-
- F#d'^# 6" f
- 'T M
r.a s,t.ee es rr.e.
,r.,s4 07 'wt /*c Tw e.
- soe,
.asr e
two rnAMc (a s y neo ryC aEJA' 'o*^O "J AT Mad *t & As e #
3 4 "E, S 9 54 r+t C eaC.
wsW
.m a
f esoso
.s a ssa rs rue.
s,rs t.
Reore. Caeno
,o e4. '* s pa.nt.
sperrtr o.rv rc weet ea r-rret Gott.
t.c tra ru r so. van.rto
..o a
,,v t.< n as ca.2.a r.
- re
,s.o er-Aw-
$ST 589 E.
sc,quasg.
fo ts. ( c. ramar = a.4 oso de" Pari.
ae$
o p.4.,.
%,ug r,(
Ibirt sf=rrsa 9 Esp 'eso er es l
Osspennto su Fwn.
ras #M ' ns**une sisears to z y.r ro s.rns es n a T's t.
E sf. ** rtJ ( d'le sw Des m E
- Je re.
-reg.
QQ C, nao p.fe a s.sm seeis p f ca
- J E FE tr*
ro
@(L 5,
a re ^. c arr..a resy r.ao. m v r-rua e,
Pe tt. re-o wei.re^we.
9sy er ca.ao. n.ss twoaAct 4., arme,t.
b ec,
rna.. wwr:
n1n.3.(r**"~
rmao or ;ss. ~r s t oo. e.o c. qr usarser c.aes u ascA,.
Ean.-
<*=~4
- Y
- n. L ~
ca<-
'+ mu ""Y m
,m
.,-,a.m men rmury ww., x
" *r *my A km r:c
- c. era aa.
wa.se.4 d<4td E.
r e-cane. se-m..,
nafar. sers ; mis cty w.nco r.
re.L TM C r Can ' cans. g c,.no eso gg,,,_o,, y
.aer pu.~
s,.
em.,
o^oEA,. two.;n e<=.
ett gam.: sec.= y (s- ) a,na..g
,,r.
E p'. [ws easf rw.
u
<a u.~
y.
sp i,4 oA rees.r-ret E rst. certo. psxweps.sst.sgstit. op ( A m o naus Bes< Co.<suurep fa,7).
r"L "* ** Af T'-
'2*fa rnic ay s 2. A &
c rwar oe rwe s*ec.o o a ~ )T= 23 n.s e
n,ns, cea a para, m s2.,g),sp u e aa Ek arrst It.a f trz.
nc, c.f.c com o
,,,,,,,,,a 7,,,
,,,,7
,,,, c,,Q ea r.> rn.u.e r>., e wr o es <s p r. of " '* ** '' "" ~ " '"' ' ( * ' '
s erQ rr
., aars; c rse-am m ne er y vo~a rw rua ari,,
ec. r.
- e. z.s m t.<,
1r Hj I4ao rw.
D'"
mc"
- A*
aha clensso c g
,r me.4_.
ra.peo,6*T :
87 1384 8 P"- C**a.8
- '^5 R t <-
r n.-
r-c.
.,.,m a r-13o.5 E r.44o cq,
- 2 *'n crar-
.o t.c. r,svr E4 D y ^tre.u.rrves.
1244.r, r s o f,w s. rto as e e is a 7 p,,,
ggy,,g g, a
{
w e-a n m. -rtp c.-o wys
.,,.&n-s m fa t. LTcr nes.nc a sys l
stno,.(s.r-s~^.o
<<=r oe e<,a
,,.n m p ar-). y seno Y t-Gy 'rie Cc; 7er.,.
M s.
) A ~*.
3.*s l2enear.sa pevesapso eia 13
.=,m na Bj /3 3 a. ra ra t.
r,.,g g sara pts 9 eg,:
or. z.7, 4 d2. ss pee n reuc r.
r,j en,*. 4-U"~ t 7,.%.go
,f.
p 9 eo p r c.
,,,..arn $ Fo~a.r. ' co&s44 Disse ~..s pru4 Aan g 14 it nt *rP#
w " s) r*~
>ca M a ie~",ny
.m evwyu e
. a.u.a w.,
,,a. n, r w
<> j u s,.
n.o o~ m, n,..,
n.<,
w.
- r. rr1 o
,e
, w.
_.u u.,m,.,
or-,,,,~ 0.v 7 ~ ear
- - O. ~
e.,s v ~ z
~.
-c w
-n. a. r-fxo.~5sr-13 -
I
IV.
Recovery and Re-Entry Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
If evacuation was ordered:
- Were arrangemer.ts made to secure the evacuatco areas?
o
- Were policy / procedures developed i
I on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g.,
l to milk dairy cows)?
N/A 2.
Was relaxation of protective actions based on monitor data indicating safe levels of radioactivity?
N/A 1
3.
Were re-entry / recovery decisions communicated promptly to all res,onse w
organizations?
4.
Were arrangements made to pr( vide t.Se public with information on:
- Safety precautions during recovery?
N/A l
- Possible health effects of low-level exposure?
N/A
- - ~ ' ~ ~
- Availability of compensation for l
financial losses sustained?
N/A l
l l
1 l
1 l
2 l E-----------------------------
s Summary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
I 1
1 1
l l
l l
e IV.
Recovery and Re-Entry Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1
If evacuation was ordered:
- Pere arrangements made to secure the evacuated areas?
v#
- Were policy / procedures developed on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g.,
to milk dairy cows)?
N/A 2.
Was relaxation of protective cctions based on monitor data indicating safe levels of radioactivity?
N/A 3.
Were re-entry / recovery decisions communicated promptly to all response organizations?
4.
Were arrangements made to provide the public with information on:
- Safety precautions during recovery?
N/A
- Possible health effects of low-level exposure?
N/A
~~
- Availability of compensation for financial losses sustained?
N/A l
l l
l l l L_____..________.__
l
/ 3 o '7
-2**'
'**
- 0 B rt 'sa %PF E='o J T5 c E r sr c s),
Ja e.ca R e
a i
/3c3 -, Eu M.
(2o *t. frvtfA -
- 3o egg EArreou*3D rato60C M,
-w erse, ca n.xs,.
bessy ge tt<<r.cn wrA.
I 3 14 - G?LL seauco r o a r-
'2 2D C^^*S ro SeseL. af LJ$.
(#
t>wm3 s sa cc=*^O reg coo ^o y ra ce>e,o
~
rum e-oc roars
- art, w.
g rso R.e.Ro47..sc.,
MA g as1ts psM Ls vs e7 43s n.at s-A M.
rysMM s>. e. ars e we 5Hearto as conooja
/ 7 z.5 -
.sessut 46tec. cood /fr4 fo ^ fo'6C r.r
,a O*/cc reto e.x
/3 2 f-7 cg cwe^ -
Calks bo Lh via pM R8 Di
- T S * %
e
[A. (a8=TS : P o8 dissm,(, me 6aor y nopin =*4 AA
- h s%
M
= esc 6,
so %s w.
c,e 5A-g a y-a,e,.rt4 4LJ a regr Desper.aso qs
/s 4 Ra e,o,
Et s tA.r m e o, p[%
KA Cdb :
%q wg y ym C p F K &^
CA Sy D}Cro %rt~ TG s osnrr y e r-r.;s fort.g.
.2-Wo erALJ l
7 se, c
-s.=_.u e carot_
litAc4 FE rsE cf,,ur-rwf.<o rc r bo' a
M 6 E T-4T-g Z3 7th
/2.RO ro 2># j gg) 4W pT
~n aa-didE5 /drsodha M SS
[** 'L.9 O S.
j3 go
-f/' Aff,5;oo C N s,a a y 'r s RA04,, dos 7 C
c o-,w w %
3r m l
<e aJ.n.
av-s
- 7.:
~ow w ewie Tmme
/J 43 u.pa ert lpurs s soc. p p.i pe w g q u3 r
tyg,.
pp ew wo nr-A'r-esA c e4KLMP.
c1.0alRocw or cz mov W dAr pit c
,a,vr o sc),
s t3rr-EJALJk-C ye aCf $36-)
Co*c atme 5 A5 Yon 4ffk Gne f.
s 4.rrk Ro OcA 1400.
n a ce.
m ewuo
.: p u r re mera. anvy.
uo i 4as ; m e. w -. p w xc
> ^GsT1 RLc 'rtim Cg'r,s Q [syrj eJr %
- g-
,g s.4* W, GsV< Om*^f iR.oj (,
- W **
1~MW " f^ktr*9T RLo eeyrve-re n
sect 8J.stry X beat, N gF JCL c,
T c.
S,
'7*cfC.,
ite T&t96 5/1/W Cf 4
l'lIi 6.mc C.***
e jf0}
f'"C.lT W
'fNyre3 W $
N4ON*d% NN W $1 Q
f Y
s l
1 l
~
4 Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
l Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
{
i i
i l
f l
l l
l 1
l
\\
I i 1 1
J
a Cyam f Esor (Lottd,
%en ryen sv Fis se ss -
to.Tr -
C+*<-
ewan smus be. auvr bn x ar wo
,a u m p,, at +
M
!*OT"
$.ACIO 4
t'.wTaet osq,.s om s t,* J
- f4 4 5 *
"FAAM nsafG N HC CMECd#' J 9 G setsee
.gu E J* c- -ts e L GLIV $
E MLT o sa YO wk pea-3 (or n2<.p
'\\6
,z 49
,,,s a,, a V e.sa*
aesr
.c enwo "
!*, wo uw m.wo,
,, m e m kw "~.rv o,a.snettwA-.
f*'"4 Ar 2s *e, saur w a ar m.,,.,,
r e
r MC Cc.A re dCf" f EMC-dw'4S F NY #8
- 4L<
/
/
hf9 Gd&4 ' TMe e de/
71fM6.1ssa T* M E'#e *W a^ELKGA eJf W
I f
aa Est-ro INI EMM7C-hOM besc rec.
' Mi&* WA-
/
GLv Raw flya osr.
g c6+ s rr A > y,{<, S r&la FA ZytreW fdrs n giDetAwQ 6fj I03 cs v p u m TNit/A 4 **.J'/pt
/IE En;y q) 4.af J y-4 C L*: 641' *4 IN 0j,
Tst us, s
/
seu was c sonxusers
- vuests,
6 7
1 l
l t
V.
Scenario Sunnary Connent on the adequacy of the scenario. Did it provide enough activity? Was it realistic? Did it test areas of earlier deficiency?
-r a prmio reoso -
ra m m ikwee sm.ys.
m.m,9 Tu t.
Fear lle *d>
J f eo w T2, JHILE IM ALs 17t<.%
2Y 12
- <y. efin rod W
~y
~~ u a ~.~
n, oF w% %,e seAvrs3 rg c. # e8 *A l-f eelvA rteel 4.rg p,ggg g
,g l
l l
l i
W I L
a i
n 8 At -
3< wu us.y ce,,;ug gn,,,,4 g,
u asts.,
842.-
E' a c-c~'tb u*"oA
%>GF3 M FFos soy o,n f yk%
Hb'DELoA
- c p r,c.erf a
Tr+,e 'st-opours s.
J e.^ v dneo c
8ST - ca se a,,,o eas,,,,,,
/,g,,,e.' sa, peyJ,
9 es' -
e oi 1-
~A aosr brAFFS foc-
..e m
g,
(,,
E+s A,y, yam;w g.
s.en og 9 39 -
pa r
- F's sE ssoot o'04,8 ' ' '
8E' ' '
f# Go to t *Fa c-(~ ra -(.
Laoan MYan ('r u) for pakse.nre fafsl RLC, l EaAc
}?Q* Can 40.
)
c) 3G -
rce. m e e,,e sas w rt i*c c
- o. sus.nsam e.s Fac n sv*c eene y g_ -
g,aj uf ACD **J
[n, page, Airpiq 4 s s FO'd CusJG' To M F a t.
sA1 " cc Q st cy d - s4,e caso r r oc; y 7 cc soeur aan Fn
,n u s TMFFIL g su.*os A,-
%Al*
(J'C-Cm"O TG sts rotAFF14.
E.sG so rALL p ococ.4.
h0007-fs M t eof B.ecsa0
,(
- c. 4 7.
Epsc. <anAO eming rsLLS A,
rdy C**'" '7" pasue 3y, u AiseH Liv cod re co st*c.T-Q$
e-F/oM 97-j 3AB-E v*c-ceedO etx.s Ave.rr o s m e.-
Gong _ s,pottsA. our-ee:
p4 pes,.c,
9 s z,.
pu ss g mot.3 LiAis @
c=v5 Aca s*L-mM
,igesasic-F%
gamerne eo.srseu.s>L, et. so s vLuo e nts.o c.
rHe g ru pux7-M %
.S*Fo l
A gew.jeod uC_
Eva c. c w w u.s vr c-n dtr sc % g
.st.
eut-Sr4 poe. u.ra A /tAes.
f**=- ***
8^**// N grr< ss 937 p m a.
- f*r'***
- Y gyj- -
rer rcu.g.cstc.
je, es7 sons.*'t * *'T w.o L %z,o du s**a we at n< e< ry
,.ez-rw w ma W
3.r"r l
9 yr -
.fA A AM *"* c'd tdL L**M M-s y y =
fel**- Cona-Q 487
- 7Gl.Lt
~'~5' C M f Ad*ZMCd t$-I f a re fw StF%s Ju*40 1
r e
yrEg,. '
(*
- M 89e 3Y Bstaept a e r ll*1T' Tarr 2.s esstE
! * 'T - TMW 9e w rj npf post spy
- W8 4 W K. %'s
\\,ewy gg
,q n %
y q p, g,' qg p ge g g-(/ * *
-,.,. c.~ y _,, m
,,,a,
)"~ AS.
C AG NR 16f
?$-$
EA 8WA of
/
f @ A51/i$
it'nt,.
LO'*J dedTJ 70
_-_