ML20238A744
| ML20238A744 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, Braidwood, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1987 |
| From: | Hunsader S COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3469K, NUDOCS 8708310191 | |
| Download: ML20238A744 (3) | |
Text
. _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _
/
N Commonwealth Edison 4'
).
One First Nitiord Plaz2, Chicago, Illinois l.
~[
7._ Address Riply to: Post Offica Dox 767 p
(
L'
- (,/.
Chicago, ll!inois 60690 - 0767 August 24, 1987
.Mr. Thomas'E. Murley,. Director'
)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~ Washington, DC. 20555
Subject:
' Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Emergency Response Facilities NRC Docket Nos. 50-454, 455, 456, and 457 Reference (a):
4 June ~1,.1987 S.C. Hunsader letter j o T.E. Murley t
Dear Mr. Murley:
Reference (a)-provided the " Final Summary Report of the Human Factors review for the Byron /Braidwood Stations Emergency Response Facilities".
Inadvertently., Page 6-3 of that report was not included in the j
submittal. Attached please find that page to be included in your review.
Please address any questions concerning this matter to this office.
Very truly yours,
{. fh= =:!%
S.C. Hunsader Nuclear Licensing Administrator cc:
L. Olshan S. Sands Resident - Byron Resident - Braidwood 3469K I
- ,Ib 0'h i
g.2; g E W,h i
-F o..
l o
a Human Engineering Finding o
a correct comment but not warranting a Pinding o
an incorrect comment; this was based on inconsistencies with other comments and with additional information available to the review team from various sources o
a general comment or opinion 6.4 Evaluation of Meed for Rec. Guide 1.97 Information Reg. Guide 1.97 variables are available in the TSC, EOF, control room or elsewhere on-site.
Readings of the unavailable variables can be obtained by SRF personnel with a phone call to J
the appropriate location.
A review of the time-critical need of information was conducted to determine if the instruments-l tion also should be made available on the ERP CRTs.
l Several task analytic techniques were used to determine the need I
for this information in the context of ERP staff members' duties and responsibilities.
Observations from the GSEP exercises were reviewed for any information deficiencies.
Second, the responses to the open-ended questions in the ERP Personnel Survey were reviewed for references to the unavailable Reg.
Guide 1.97 information.
6.5 Reference to the DCRDR Task Analysis / Validation Data The task analysis and validation data collected during the DCRDR were reviewed to determine if they had any implication for the information needs of the TSC and EOP.
There were no references to the TSC or EOF found in these data.
This is not surprising because, while guidance from personnel in the TSC and EOF can be a valuable input to the control room operating crew, the assumption made in designing the procedures and training programs for control room personnel is that they should be able to function without being dependent on such input.
6-3 a